What changed in this filing

/stocks — the workspaceLOADING

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis

2026-07-28 compared with 2026-05-06 · 378 added, 522 removed, 67 unchanged (93% of the section changed)

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this section to “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” “Core Scientific,”

or “Core” refer to Core Scientific, Inc.

Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this section to “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” “Core Scientific,” or “Core” refer to Core Scientific, Inc.

and its subsidiaries.

The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is

intended to promote understanding of the results of operations and financial condition of the Company.

This MD&A is provided as a

supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the

accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements (Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q) as well as the financial and other

information included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the Securities and

Exchange Commission on March 2, 2026.

This section generally discusses the results of operations for the three months ended

March 31, 2026 , compared to March 31, 2025 .

As discussed in the section titled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” the following discussion and

analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never

materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking

Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those identified below, and those

discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” under Part I, Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December

31, 2025, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2026.

The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to promote understanding of the results of operations and financial condition of the Company.

This MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q) as well as the financial and other information included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2026.

This section generally discusses the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to June 30, 2025.

As discussed in the section titled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those identified below, and those discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” under Part I, Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2026.

Core Scientific, Inc.

(“we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” “Core Scientific,” or “Core”) designs, builds and operates large-scale

purpose-built data centers that support high-density colocation services and digital asset mining for both our own account and to a

lesser extent, third-party customers.

Our data centers are optimized for power-intensive, mission-critical computing workloads, with a

focus on artificial intelligence (“AI”) and other high-performance computing (“HPC”) applications.

In 2024, we announced our first high-density colocation contract with CoreWeave, Inc.

(“CoreWeave), a provider of HPC

services, which was subsequently expanded to 590 megawatts (“MW”) of leased customer power capacity over the exercise of several

contractual options.

We believe leveraging our existing infrastructure for high-density colocation services will provide more stable and

predictable revenue streams and represents substantially less risk over time than our traditional hosted bitcoin mining or self-mining

We are constructing, refurbishing, reallocating or converting our 11 facilities in Alabama (1), Georgia (2), Kentucky (1), North

Carolina (1), North Dakota (1), Oklahoma (1), and Texas (4) to support artificial intelligence related workloads, in support of our

existing colocation customer, but also to support our commitment to meeting the growing demand for high-density colocation

solutions and diversifying our customer base.

This will be done as circumstances allow and, in a manner, designed to retain access to

electrical power under our control, maximize the value of our digital asset mining equipment to third parties, and fulfill existing

obligations to suppliers and customers .

In addition to converting our existing portfolio, we are actively pursuing the acquisition of

new sites, including land and power capacity, to expand our data center footprint beyond our current facilities.

We will continue to mine digital assets and manage our self-mining fleet with a focus on power expense coverage and cash

generation while we convert our data centers for alternative high-density colocation service business opportunities.

increase revenue derived from high-density colocation (“HDC”) services as capacity gets delivered to our current end customer as well

as when we sign and begin generating revenue from new colocation customers.

As of March 31, 2026, we operated a diversified portfolio of ten data centers across seven U.S.

states, representing

approximately 1.9 gigawatts (“GW”) of gross utility power capacity, or approximately 1.3 G W of total leasable customer power

We continue to be in active discussions with both our existing and future potential utility providers regarding additional

power allocations.

For the three months ended March 31, 2026 , total revenue increased to $115.2 million from $79.5 million for the prior period,

primarily due to higher colocation revenue from incremental billable customer power capacity, partially offset by lower digital asset

self-mining revenue driven by reduced bitcoin production and lower average bitcoin prices.

Operating loss was $310.4 million for the

three months ended March 31, 2026 , compared to $47.0 million in the prior period, primarily driven by $266.5 million of non-cash

impairment charges on mining-related property, plant and equipment.

Net loss was $347.2 million during the three months ended

March 31, 2026 , compared to net income of $576.3 million in the prior period, and included significant non-cash items, including

changes of $30.8 million in the fair value of warrants and contingent value rights.

Adjusted EBITDA increased to $4.4 million from

$(6.1) million in the prior period.

is a leader in designing, building and operating large-scale purpose-built data centers for HDC services.

We develop and operate facilities serving AI and HPC related workloads and are a provider of digital infrastructure to our third-party customers.

The majority of our revenue is derived from HDC service.

Our strategic objective is to maximize the value of our large-scale data center infrastructure portfolio by converting power capacity across our facilities into long-term contracted HDC revenue streams.

We believe this strategy enhances the predictability of future cash flows, reduces the relative contribution of bitcoin market volatility to our operating results, and increases the long-term value of our infrastructure platform relative to its historical use in digital asset mining operations.

In 2024, we announced our first HDC contract with CoreWeave, a provider of HPC services, which was subsequently expanded to approximately 590 MW of leased customer power capacity across five sites.

As of June 30, 2026, approximately 395 MW has commenced billing.

During the six months ended June 30, 2026, certain CoreWeave license agreements were assigned to a special purpose vehicle financing structure while CoreWeave remained a primary obligor under the agreements.

See “Strategic Transition to High-Density Colocation Services” below for a more detailed discussion of this arrangement and the associated risks.

While our current colocation revenue remains concentrated with a single customer, we believe our available unleased power capacity provides a meaningful opportunity to diversify our customer base over time.

As of June 30, 2026, we controlled approximately 2.1 GW of gross utility power capacity, or approximately 1.3 GW of total leasable customer power capacity across 11 data centers in seven U.S.

states including Alabama ( 1 ), Georgia ( 2) , Kentucky (1), North Carolina (1), North Dakota (1), Oklahoma (1), and Texas (4).

We continue to develop, convert and expand most of our facilities to support AI and HPC workloads while pursuing additional land and power opportunities to expand our data center footprint.

We expect colocation revenue to increase as additional contracted capacity is commissioned and delivered to our existing customer and as we add new customer relationships over time.

We continue to operate a self-mining fleet at two facilities and provide hosted mining services to one remaining customer.

Our hosted mining operations are expected to conclude by December 31, 2026, while we continue to wind down our self-mining operations.

2026 Highlights:

• On July 28, 2026, we announced a strategic commercial relationship with AMD with the potential to support up to 2.5 GW of leasable capacity, anchored by a 15-year agreement for approximately 530 MW across five sites.

• On May 6, 2026, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Core Scientific Finance completed a $3.3 billion offering of 7.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2031 (the "Senior Secured Notes”).

The net proceeds were used to fund a debt service reserve account and to repay in full and terminate our Term Loan Facility.

The Senior Secured Notes and related guarantees are secured by first-priority liens, among other things, on substantially all assets of Core Scientific Finance and its subsidiary guarantors, which own or operate our specified data center development projects.

For additional details, see Note 7 — Debt to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

• Billable customer power capacity of 395 MW as of June 30, 2026, against 590 MW of leased customer power capacity, with the remaining 195 MW in various stages of construction and commissioning.

• On May 5, 2026, we closed on the acquisition of land and related electrical power in Hunt County, Texas for approximately $233 million in cash, which is expected to support approximately 430 MW of gross power capacity, with an approved ERCOT interconnection ramp schedule.

For additional details, see Note 3 — Asset Acquisition to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

• In May 2026, we announced our entry into an agreement and plan of merger to acquire Polaris DS LLC, for approximately $421 million in cash, subject to certain adjustments.

The acquisition will add approximately 40 additional acres adjacent to our existing data center operating in Muskogee, Oklahoma, and will provide up to 440 MW of gross utility power capacity.

The transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2026.

For additional details, see Note 10 — Commitments and Contingencies to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

These operational milestones, together with the strategic financing and portfolio developments outlined above, drove the financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, which are summarized below.

Financial Results:

• Total revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 was $164.2 million and $279.4 million, respectively, compared to $78.6 million and $158.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025.

◦ Colocation revenue was $136.7 million and $214.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, compared to $10.6 million and $19.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively.

The increase in colocation revenue was driven by incremental billable customer power capacity delivered to our customer.

◦ Digital asset self-mining revenue was $21.5 million and $51.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, compared to $62.4 million and $129.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively.

The decrease reflected a reduction in bitcoin mined of 53% and 49% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, as well as a decline in the average bitcoin price of 27% and 23% for the same periods, respectively.

◦ The increase in colocation revenue and corresponding decline in self-mining revenue reflects the continued execution of our strategy to reallocate power capacity from digital asset mining to long-term contracted colocation services.

• Net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 was $1.2 billion and $1.5 billion, respectively, compared to $936.8 million and $360.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively.

Net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily driven by the change in fair value of warrants.

Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was also impacted by a $266.5 million impairment charge on mining-related property, plant and equipment recognized during the first quarter of 2026.

• Adjusted EBITDA was $41.1 million and $50.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, compared to $28.5 million and $26.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively.

Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure.

See “ Key Business Operating Metrics and

Non-GAAP Financial Measures ” below for our definition of, and additional information related to Adjusted EBITDA.

See “Key Business Operating Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for our definition and reconciliation to net loss.

• Capital expenditures were $954.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, of which $180.9 million was funded by CoreWeave pursuant to its existing colocation service agreement with the Company.

• Cash and cash equivalents and digital assets totaled $1.8 billion as of June 30, 2026.

Recent Developments

Term Loan Facility

On March 4, 2026, we entered into a loan facility Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”), by and among us, as borrower,

the lenders party thereto from time to time (the “Lenders”) and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc.

(“MSSF”), as administrative

agent and collateral agent.

The Credit Agreement provides for a senior secured loan facility (the “Term Loan Facility”) in an aggregate

principal amount of $500.0 million.

The Credit Agreement also provides for an accordion feature that allowed us to request an

increase in commitments under the Credit Agreement by up to an additional $500.0 million.

Subject to certain customary conditions,

we may borrow funds available under the Term Loan Facility, in up to ten separate advances, during the period commencing on May

4, 2026 and ending on the date that is one business day prior to the Maturity Date (as defined below).

We borrowed the full $500.0

million initially available under the Credit Agreement on March 5, 2026.

On March 18, 2026, we entered into an Amendment No.

1 to the Credit Agreement (the “Incremental Amendment”) with

MSSF and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

(“JPM”), as Amendment No.

1 Term Lender, which amends the Credit Agreement to increase

the term loan commitments thereunder by $500.0 million, to $1.0 billion total, pursuant to the accordion feature.

We borrowed the full

$500.0 million incremental commitment on March 18, 2026.

The Term Loan Facility will mature, and all obligations thereunder will become due and payable, on March 3, 2027 (the

“Maturity Date”).

Loans under the Term Loan Facility bear interest at a rate equal to term SOFR (subject to a 0% floor), plus an

applicable margin of 2.50% per annum.

Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain of our direct or indirect, wholly owned material domestic

subsidiaries and are secured by a first-priority lien on substantially all our and the guarantors assets.

In connection with the offering of $3.3 billion aggregate principal amount of 7.75% senior secured notes due 2031 by our

indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Core Scientific Finance I LLC, as described below, we used a portion of the proceeds from such

offering that was distributed to us to repay in full the outstanding borrowings under the Term Loan Facility, including accrued interest

thereon and fees and expenses in connection therewith, and upon such repayment, we terminated the Term Loan Facility.

Senior Secured Notes Offering

On April 22, 2026, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Core Scientific Finance I LLC ("Core Scientific Finance"), priced a

private offering of $3.30 billion aggregate principal amount of 7.75% senior secured notes due 2031 at an issue price of 99.25% of the

principal amount.

Core Scientific Finance used the net proceeds from the offering to fund a debt service reserve account, and the

remaining proceeds to make a distribution to us, a portion of which we used to repay in full the outstanding borrowings under the

Term Loan Facility, including accrued interest thereon and fees and expenses in connection therewith.

The Offering closed on May 6,

The Notes are guaranteed by each of Core Scientific Austin LLC, Core Scientific Denton LLC, Core Scientific Dalton LLC,

Core Scientific Marble LLC and Core Scientific Muskogee LLC, which collectively represent Core Scientific Finance's only

subsidiaries (the "Subsidiary Guarantors").

In connection with the Offering, we have commenced a series of restructuring transactions intended to transfer or grant all

assets and rights reasonably necessary for the development and operation of specified data center facilities to Core Scientific Finance

and the Subsidiary Guarantors.

The Notes and related guarantees are secured by first-priority liens on (i) substantially all assets of Core Scientific Finance and

the Subsidiary Guarantors, other than certain excluded property, (ii) all equity interests of Core Scientific Finance held by the direct

parent of Core Scientific Finance, Core Scientific Finance Holding LLC ("Holdco"), and (iii) certain of our assets and rights to be

transferred or granted, as applicable, to Core Scientific Finance and the Subsidiary Guarantors pursuant to the restructuring described

above that have not yet been transferred or granted as of the date hereof.

In addition, in connection with the issuance of the Secured Notes, we provide a customary, uncapped completion guarantee for

the benefit of the holders of the Notes with respect to the completion of the data center development projects.

The completion

guarantee will require that we provide Core Scientific Finance with funds necessary to ensure the completion of such projects in the

event that the proceeds of the offering of Secured Notes and other available funds are insufficient to do so.

CoreWeave Special Purpose Vehicle

The Company received notice from its counterparty, CoreWeave, Inc., of its intention to enter into assignment and assumption

agreements for our Dalton 1 and Denton North Colocation License Agreements and Orders, as amended, ("License Agreements") with

a special purpose vehicle that is an indirect subsidiary of CoreWeave, Inc.

We understand that CW SPV received certain

commitments from a customer sufficient for the debt issued by CW SPV to obtain an investment grade rating.

While CoreWeave

remains a primary obligor under the terms of the License Agreements, as a result of the assignment and assumption agreements, CW

SPV is now the Licensee under the License Agreements.

On July 27, 2026, the Company entered into Lease Agreements (collectively, the “AMD Leases”) with Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

(“AMD”) for an aggregate of 377 MW of critical IT capacity at the Company’s Pecos, TX;

Muskogee, OK;

and Hunt County, TX sites;

and Lease Agreements (the “Neocloud Leases,” and collectively with the AMD Leases, the “Leases”) with a Neocloud (“Neocloud”), for 152 MW of critical IT capacity at the Company’s Auburn, AL and Dalton Phase 3, GA sites.

Each of the Leases is for a fifteen year term with three five-year options.

The AMD Leases provide AMD a reservation of capacity right to lease from the Company at certain times and under certain circumstances an additional 1,925 MWs of critical IT capacity through December 28, 2028.

In connection with the Neocloud Leases, each of the Company, Neocloud and AMD has entered into a Credit Support Agreement with respect to each Neocloud Lease:

(i) establishing protections for AMD equipment held within the applicable Neocloud Lease premises, (ii) providing AMD the right, but not the obligation, to cure certain defaults of Neocloud under the applicable Neocloud Lease, and (iii) establishing AMD’s rights and obligations in the event of certain material defaults by a Neocloud with respect to the applicable Neocloud Lease.

Each Credit Support Agreement will terminate automatically upon earliest to occur of the expiration of the applicable Neocloud Lease, specified circumstances relating to the insolvency or default of Neocloud, and 15 years from the effective date of the applicable Neocloud Lease.

In addition, AMD may terminate the applicable Credit Support Agreement upon the Company’s breach of a material representation, subject to a specified cure period.

In addition, the Company issued to AMD a warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase up to 30 million shares (the “Warrant Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.00001 per share (“Common Stock”) at an exercise price of $23.47 per share, which represents the volume-weighted average price of the Company’s Common Stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market for the five trading days prior to execution of the Leases.

The Warrant is exercisable immediately, subject to satisfaction of the vesting conditions therein, and will terminate on July 27, 2031.

The Warrant Shares will vest at a rate of 12,222 shares per each one megawatt (“MW”) of critical IT load contemplated by the Leases.

As a result of the Leases executed on July 27, 2026, an aggregate of approximately 6.5 million Warrant Shares vested and became exercisable.

The Warrant was issued, and the Warrant Shares are expected to be issued, in reliance on the exemption from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).

Key Factors Affecting Our Financial Performance

Our results of operations, liquidity and cash flows are affected by a number of factors, including (i) our ability to execute our

strategic transition toward high‑density colocation services, (ii) bitcoin market conditions and network fundamentals that drive

self‑mining economics, (iii) broader macroeconomic and regulatory developments, (iv) power prices and curtailment activity, and (v)

the competitive landscape for our industry.

The factors below highlight key drivers that have affected, and may continue to affect, our

financial performance.

Our financial performance depends in part on our ability to operate our self‑mining fleet profitably and, as we transition our

business, to execute and expand our colocation operations and attract and retain colocation customers.

Increases in power costs,

inability to mine digital assets efficiently and to sell digital assets at favorable prices will reduce our operating margins and could have

a material near-term adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, sustained declines in

bitcoin prices or adverse changes in network conditions could reduce cash generated from self‑mining during periods where

self‑mining remains a significant contributor to our results.

Our results of operations, liquidity and cash flows are affected by a number of factors, including (i) our ability to execute and scale our HDC business, retain our existing colocation customer and attract new colocation customers, (ii) our ability to complete construction of contracted data center capacity on schedule and within budget, (iii) customer concentration and the financial health of our primary colocation customer, (iv) bitcoin market conditions and network fundamentals that continue to affect our Digital Asset Self‑Mining segment during our transition period, (v) power costs and availability across our portfolio, (vi) broader macroeconomic, regulatory and tariff developments, and (vii) our ability to service our debt obligations and fund our capital requirements.

The factors below highlight key drivers that have affected, and may continue to affect, our financial performance.

Strategic Transition to High-Density Colocation Services

As we grow our Colocation operations over the next several years by converting the remaining bitcoin mining sites and adding

new infrastructure and customers, we expect Colocation to represent a larger share of our results and gradually reduce our exposure to

bitcoin spot price volatility.

The Colocation segment is characterized by the implementation of long-term contracts with customers

spanning 10+ years with terms and conditions resulting in stable, predictable revenue and cash flows over each period.

The pace of this transition, and the timing of related revenue and cash flows, depends on (i) customer deployment schedules

under existing and future contracts and (ii) the timing and cost of converting and commissioning incremental billable customer power

Conversion capital expenditures and timelines are sensitive to equipment lead times and availability, labor constraints,

permitting and interconnection sequencing, and supply chain and logistical challenges.

Changes in these inputs can affect when

incremental capacity becomes billable and therefore may affect the timing of colocation revenue, cost of services and related cash

High-density colocation is now our primary business.

For the six months ended June 30, 2026, colocation revenue represented 77% of total revenue, compared to 12% for the six months ended June 30, 2025, reflecting the rapid scaling of billable customer power capacity under our agreement with CoreWeave.

We expect colocation to represent an increasingly dominant share of our results as additional capacity is commissioned and delivered, gradually reducing our exposure to bitcoin spot price volatility and the operational risks associated with digital asset mining.

During the transition period, our consolidated results reflect both the ramp up of colocation revenue and the planned decline of our mining operations, and we expect this dynamic to continue as additional contracted capacity is placed in service.

The Colocation segment is characterized by the implementation of long-term contracts spanning 10 or more years with payment structures that provide terms and conditions resulting in stable, predictable revenue and cash flows over each contract period.

As of June 30, 2026, we had contracted 590 MW of leased customer power capacity and were actively billing for 395 MW.

The gap between leased and billable capacity represents our primary near-term revenue growth opportunity.

The pace at which we convert leased capacity to billable capacity depends on a number of factors, including equipment lead times and availability, labor constraints, permitting and interconnection sequencing, supply chain and logistical challenges, and the pace of customer deployment under existing contracts.

Changes in these inputs can affect when incremental capacity becomes billable and therefore may affect the timing of colocation revenue, cost of services and related cash flows.

In addition to converting our existing facilities we are also developing new data center sites, including our recently acquired Hunt County, Texas campus.

Both conversion and new site development carry meaningful execution risks, including construction cost variability, equipment lead times, permitting uncertainty, and technical requirements associated with high-density colocation workloads.

Our colocation revenue is currently derived entirely from a single customer, CoreWeave, a provider of HPC services.

For the six months ended June 30, 2026, CoreWeave represented approximately 77% of our total revenue.

This concentration means that our financial results, liquidity and cash flows are highly dependent on CoreWeave’s continued performance of its obligations under our license agreements, its financial health, and its ongoing demand for our data center capacity.

During the period, CoreWeave entered into assignment and assumption agreements transferring certain license agreements to CW SPV, a special purpose vehicle that is an indirect subsidiary of CoreWeave.

CoreWeave remains a primary obligor under those

While we believe this structure supports the long-term stability of these arrangements, the assignment introduces an additional layer of counterparty structure, and our revenue and cash flows remain dependent on performance by entities within the CoreWeave corporate family.

Our practical ability to enforce recourse against CoreWeave would depend on its financial condition at the time of any default.

Any material adverse change in CoreWeave’s business, financial condition or ability to perform under our license agreements could have a disproportionate impact on our revenue, results of operations and liquidity.

Our deferred revenue balance as of June 30, 2026 includes significant customer prepayments for capacity not yet delivered.

To the extent we are unable to deliver contracted capacity on schedule, or if our customer relationship was disrupted, our revenue recognition, deferred revenue obligations and capital recovery could be materially affected.

A key strategic priority is diversifying our customer base by signing new colocation customers.

Our ability to do so depends on a number of factors, including the availability and timing of unleased capacity at our facilities, the competitive environment for high-power data center capacity, pricing dynamics in the colocation market, and our ability to demonstrate reliable execution on our existing contract.

Until we successfully diversify our customer base, our financial results will remain highly sensitive to the performance of our relationship with CoreWeave.

Electricity Costs

In our Colocation segment, power costs are passed through to our customer without markup and are recognized as revenue on a gross basis, with a corresponding charge to cost of colocation services.

As a result, changes in power prices affect colocation revenue and cost of services in equal measure, with no corresponding impact on colocation gross profit.

However, significant changes in power prices can cause large fluctuations in reported colocation revenue and cost of revenue that are not indicative of changes in underlying operating performance.

Nonetheless, this pass-through structure provides an important degree of insulation from power price volatility on our largest and fastest growing revenue stream.

In our Digital Asset Self‑Mining and Digital Asset Hosted Mining segments, electricity is the primary operating cost and is not passed through to customers.

In these segments, increases in power prices directly compress margins.

The cost and availability of electricity are affected by changes in seasonal demand, with peak demand during summer months driving higher costs and increased curtailments to support grid operators.

Severe weather events, geopolitical developments, and macroeconomic factors can also affect power costs and availability in ways outside our control.

As our colocation business grows and our mining operations wind down, the proportion of our cost base subject to direct power price exposure will decrease.

Beyond cost, the availability of sufficient electrical power is one of the most important constraints on our colocation growth.

The timing of utility approvals, interconnection studies, and power delivery agreements can affect when new capacity becomes available and therefore may affect the timing of our capital deployment and revenue ramp.

We continue to be in active discussions with both our existing and future potential utility providers regarding additional power allocations across our portfolio, and we believe our ability to secure and maintain these agreements is a key factor affecting our long-term growth and competitive positioning.

Bitcoin Market Conditions

Our Digital Asset Self-Mining segment is heavily dependent on the spot price of bitcoin.

The prices of digital assets,

specifically bitcoin, have experienced substantial volatility, meaning that high or low prices may have little or no relationship to

identifiable market forces, may be subject to rapidly changing investor sentiment, and may be influenced by factors such as

technology, regulatory developments and enforcement actions.

Bitcoin (as well as other digital assets) may have value based on

various factors, including their acceptance as a means of exchange by consumers and others, scarcity, and market demand.

the market price of bitcoin can materially affect (i) revenue recognized from self‑mining, (ii) the fair value of digital assets we hold

and related gains or losses recognized in our results of operations, and (iii) liquidity to the extent we sell bitcoin as part of our treasury

Bitcoin miners also receive a transaction fee in the form of a portion of bitcoin for validating transactions on the Bitcoin

The transaction fee can vary in value over time, with higher fees prioritizing certain transactions over those with lower fees.

An increase in Bitcoin network transaction fees increases mining proceeds.

Higher power costs, lower realized bitcoin prices, or reduced mining efficiency would reduce self-mining margins and cash

generation during periods when self-mining remains a significant contributor to our results.

As we transition, the timing of colocation

conversions and customer deployments, and our ability to execute and scale colocation operations and retain colocation customers,

will increasingly influence our revenue mix and profitability.

Our Digital Asset Self-Mining segment revenue is directly dependent on the spot price of bitcoin.

For the six months ended June 30, 2026, self-mining represented 18% of total revenue, down from 82% for the six months ended June 30, 2025, as we have strategically reallocated power capacity from mining to colocation operations.

Bitcoin prices continue to affect the performance of our Digital Asset Self-Mining segment, including mining revenue, the value of digital assets held on our balance sheet, and the recoverability of mining-related assets.

During the six months ended June 30, 2026, deteriorating mining economics contributed to a $266.5 million impairment charge on mining-related assets.

As our transition to colocation progresses, we expect bitcoin market conditions to have a diminishing effect on our overall financial results.

We continue to manage our self-mining fleet with a focus on generating cash flows and covering power expenses while we execute our colocation transition.

We will be opportunistic in monetizing our bitcoin holdings, subject to market conditions and our treasury strategy.

Bitcoin Network Fundamentals

Our business is not only impacted by the volatility in digital asset prices and transaction fees, but also by increases in the

competition for digital asset production.

For bitcoin, this increased competition is described as the network hash rate resulting from the

growth in the overall quantity and quality of miners working to solve blocks on the bitcoin blockchain, and the difficulty index

associated with the secure hashing algorithm employed in solving the blocks.

Increases in network hash rate generally increase

network difficulty over time, which can reduce the amount of bitcoin earned for a given level of deployed hash rate and power

Increased difficulty reduces the mining proceeds of the equipment proportionally and eventually requires bitcoin miners to

upgrade their mining equipment to remain profitable and compete effectively with other miners.

Difficulty and network conditions are

outside of our control and can materially affect our self‑mining revenue and margins.

Beginning on February 1, 2025, the United States government announced a series of additional tariffs on goods imported to the

United States, raising concerns about material price inflation and delivery delays with respect to equipment and materials needed for

our high-density colocation data center conversions and also with respect to parts, machinery and hardware used in our digital asset

mining business.

During the three months ended March 31, 2026, t ariffs contributed to higher costs for certain equipment and

materials procured directly by the Company for non-customer-funded projects.

Our agreement with our HDC customer is funded

almost entirely by the customer, and our financial contribution is capped at a fixed dollar amount, limiting our exposure to tariff-

related cost increases on customer-funded capital expenditures.

We could experience additional impacts from tariffs on our results of operations in future periods.

We continue to analyze the

additional impact of these tariffs on our business and actions we can take to minimize any current and future impact.

further increases in tariffs on key equipment and materials could affect conversion economics, timelines and/or operating costs, which

could affect the timing and profitability of our colocation expansion.

Electricity Costs

Electricity cost is the major operating cost for our mining fleet, as well as for the hosted mining services provided to customers.

The cost and availability of electricity are affected primarily by changes in seasonal demand, with peak demand during the summer

months driving higher costs and increased curtailments to support grid operators.

Severe winter weather can increase the cost of

electricity and the frequency of curtailments when it results in damage to power transmission infrastructure that reduces the grid’s

ability to deliver power.

Geopolitical and macroeconomic factors, such as overseas military or economic conflict between states, can

adversely affect electricity costs by raising the cost of power generation inputs such as natural gas.

Other events out of our control can

also impact electricity costs and availability.

In our self‑mining and hosted mining operations, increases in power prices and/or

increased curtailments can materially reduce margins and cash generation.

In our colocation operations, power costs are passed

through to customers and changes in power prices may increase revenue and cost of colocation services without a corresponding

change in gross profit.

Our Competition and Customers

In addition to factors underlying our mining business growth and profitability, the success of our Colocation business greatly

depends on our ability to retain and develop opportunities with our existing customers, secure additional infrastructure and attract new

Competition in digital asset mining is driven in part by access to low‑cost power, scale, fleet efficiency and capital availability,

and can contribute to increases in network hash rate and difficulty.

We face significant competition in every aspect of our business,

including, but not limited to, the acquisition of new miners, the ability to raise capital, obtaining low-cost electricity, obtaining access

to sites with reliable sources of high power, and evaluating new technology developments in the industry.

Based on available data, we believe that an increase in the scale and sophistication of competition in the digital asset mining

industry has continued to increase network hash rate, with new entrants and existing competitors increasing the number of miners

mining for bitcoin.

Despite this trend, our ability to compete in self‑mining will depend on managing fleet efficiency, power costs and capital

allocation as we shift resources toward colocation.

In our Colocation operations, we compete with other providers of high-power data center capacity, such as major data center

real estate investment trusts, developers of data centers, hyperscalers and bitcoin miners with capacity suitable for high-density

colocation services.

This competition focuses primarily on the identification and acquisition of new, high-power sites, but also

includes competition for the capital required to build or modify existing sites to support high-density colocation.

Competition in colocation may affect pricing, contract terms, and the pace at which we can secure additional power and sites

and therefore may affect revenue growth and required capital expenditures.

Our self-mining results are also affected by competitive dynamics of the Bitcoin network, including the network hash rate and difficulty in solving blocks.

Increases in network hash rate result in higher network difficulty over time, which reduces the amount of bitcoin earned for a given level of deployed hash rate and power consumption.

These dynamics are entirely outside of our control.

As we wind down our mining operations and reallocate capacity to colocation, network difficulty affects the rate at which we are able to generate value from our remaining mining fleet during the transition period.

We are not investing in new mining equipment to

maintain or expand our mining hash rate.

Rather, our focus is on maximizing the cash generation from our existing fleet while we convert facilities and, where appropriate, selling or otherwise monetizing mining equipment as we retire it from service.

To the extent network difficulty increases materially or bitcoin transaction fees decline, the revenue and cash generation from our remaining fleet during the transition period will be reduced.

Beginning on February 1, 2025, the United States government announced a series of additional tariffs on goods imported to the United States, raising concerns about price inflation and delivery delays with respect to equipment and materials used in our data center conversions and our digital asset mining business.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, tariffs contributed to higher costs for certain equipment and materials procured directly by the Company for non-customer-funded projects.

Our agreement with CoreWeave is funded almost entirely by the customer, and our financial contribution to those projects is capped at a fixed dollar amount, limiting our exposure to tariff-related cost increases on customer-funded capital expenditures.

However, capital expenditures associated with developing new data center sites, including our Hunt County, Texas campus and the Muskogee, Oklahoma site we have agreed to acquire, are not subject to the same customer-funding structure as our existing CoreWeave conversion projects.

To the extent these sites require significant equipment and material procurement funded directly by the Company, our exposure to tariff-related cost increases on those projects may be greater than on our existing customer-funded portfolio.

Sustained or further increases in tariffs on key equipment and materials could affect construction costs, timelines, and operating economics at these sites, which could affect the timing and profitability of our colocation expansion.

We continue to analyze the impact of tariffs on our business and the actions we can take to minimize current and future exposure.

Certain equipment and material used in our data center development have lead times in excess of 12 months.

To the extent we are able to place orders in advance of potential tariff increases, our exposure to future cost escalation on those items may be reduced.

Debt Service and Capital Requirements

Our capital structure has changed materially during 2026.

As of June 30, 2026, our consolidated indebtedness includes $460.0 million of 3.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2029 (the “2029 Convertible Notes”), $625.0 million of 0.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2031 (the “2031 Convertible Notes”), and $3.30 billion of 7.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2031 issued by our indirect subsidiary Core Scientific Finance.

The Senior Secured Notes require semi-annual interest payments on May 15 and November 15 of each year, beginning November 15, 2026, and semi-annual principal amortization at an initial annual rate of 11.50% of the original principal amount outstanding on the issue date until the notes are repaid, repurchased, redeemed or otherwise discharged, beginning on the First Installment Payment Date.

The First Installment Payment Date is defined as the first semi-annual payment date occurring at least 15 days after both rent commencement under the related data center leases and the abatement of all revenue credits provided to the tenant.

Revenue credits refer to fixed amounts credited against the tenant’s payment obligation during the initial ramp-up period under the license agreements.

As a result, the timing of principal amortization is directly linked to our operational delivery milestones under our colocation arrangements.

Our construction capital requirements are also substantial.

As of June 30, 2026, we were contractually committed to approximately $1.0 billion of future cash expenditures, of which approximately $264 million will be passed through to our customer as invoiced, with substantially all remaining expenditures expected to occur within the next 12 months.

The interaction between our debt service obligations, construction capital commitments, customer prepayment inflows, and operating cash flows is a key factor affecting our liquidity and capital allocation decisions.

See "Liquidity and Capital Resources" below for further discussion.

Our Competition

In our Colocation segment, we compete for customers and capacity with major data center real estate investment trusts, developers of purpose-built data centers and other operators with high-power capacity suitable for AI and HPC workloads.

Competition in this market focuses primarily on facility location, timing, power capacity availability and scale, reliability and uptime, reputation, technical specifications including power density and cooling capabilities, pricing and contract terms, speed of delivery, and track record of execution.

Our ability to attract new colocation customers and diversify beyond our current single-customer concentration depends on our ability to compete effectively across these dimensions.

The market for HDC capacity serving AI workloads has grown rapidly, and competition for both customers and new sites has intensified.

Competition for new power capacity and land sites is particularly acute, as utilities and grid operators have limited interconnection capacity in many markets and the lead times for securing new power agreements can be significant.

Our ability to secure attractive new sites and power agreements before competitors do is an important factor affecting our long-term growth.

In our Digital Asset Self-Mining segment, competition is driven by access to low-cost power, mining fleet efficiency, scale, and capital availability.

As we wind down our mining operations, our ability to compete effectively as a miner becomes a declining factor in our overall financial performance.

We will continue to manage our existing fleet with a focus on cash generation rather than competitive positioning, and we do not intend to make material new investments in mining capacity.

We operate in a dynamic regulatory environment.

For a discussion of federal, state, and international regulatory developments

affecting our digital asset mining and colocation activities, see “Government Regulation” in Part I, Item 1 “Business” section in our

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2,

We continue to evaluate whether any such developments present known trends or uncertainties that may materially impact our

operations, energy costs, or customer demand.

Regulatory developments affecting digital assets, data centers, energy markets and

environmental matters could affect compliance costs, power availability and pricing, and customer demand, which could impact our

results of operations and liquidity.

For a discussion of federal, state, and international regulatory developments affecting our digital asset mining and colocation activities, see “Government Regulation” in Part I, Item 1 “Business” section in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2026.

We continue to evaluate whether regulatory developments present known trends or uncertainties that may materially impact our operations, energy costs, or customer demand.

Regulatory developments affecting data centers, energy markets, AI infrastructure, and environmental matters could affect compliance costs, power availability and pricing, permitting timelines, and customer demand, each of which could impact our results of operations and liquidity.

In particular, regulatory requirements governing data center construction, environmental impact, and utility interconnection could affect the timeline and cost of developing our new sites, and our ability to complete our contracted data center development projects on schedule.

We continue to monitor these developments closely and incorporate regulatory considerations into our site selection, development planning, and capital allocation decisions.

Key Business Operating Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In addition to our financial results, we use the following business operating metrics and non-GAAP financial measures to

evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends affecting our business, and make strategic decisions.

These operating

metrics and non‑GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, our consolidated financial

statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”).

Management also uses the following data center capacity and power metrics (measured in megawatts) to evaluate the scale of

our utility power footprint and customer IT load capacity, monitor customer commitments and remaining available capacity, assess

commissioning progress and deployment pacing, and inform capital allocation and site planning decisions.

Unless otherwise indicated,

these metrics are presented as of period end and represent management estimates based on operational and engineering data and may

not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other operators.

How management uses it

In addition to our financial results, we use the following business operating metrics and non-GAAP financial measures to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends affecting our business, and make strategic decisions.

These operating metrics and non‑GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, our consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Management also uses the following data center capacity and power metrics (measured in megawatts) to evaluate the scale of our utility power footprint and customer IT load capacity, monitor customer commitments and remaining available capacity, assess commissioning progress and deployment pacing, and inform capital allocation and site planning decisions.

Unless otherwise indicated, these metrics are presented as of period end and represent management estimates based on operational and engineering data and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other operators.

Metric (MW) Definition How management uses it

Gross Utility Power Capacity

Total electric utility power capacity agreements

associated with our data center sites under our

control as of period end, including capacity that

is commissioned for future use.

Used for portfolio planning and utility power

allocation discussions.

Total Leasable Customer Power

Our estimate of the total non-redundant

customer IT load that our data center sites could

support in the aggregate as of period end,

regardless of whether such capacity has been

contracted with customers or remains available

This metric is representative of the

amount of power available for customer use in

servicing their workloads.

Used to assess total customer‑usable IT load

available for leasing, evaluate leased versus

unleased capacity, and plan conversion/

development sequencing and sales capacity.

Leased Customer Power

Power capacity that is committed to customers

under executed customer contracts, regardless of

whether service has commenced as of period

Used to monitor signed customer commitments

and contracted backlog and to plan future

deployment/commissioning requirements.

Unleased Customer Power

The portion of Total Leasable Customer Power

not committed under customer contracts as of

This metric is calculated as Total

Leasable Customer Power minus Leased

Customer Power Capacity.

Used to monitor remaining uncommitted

customer IT load and to prioritize incremental

contracting and conversion/commissioning

Billable Customer Power

Portion of Leased Customer Power Capacity for

which service has commenced and we are

actively billing as of period end.

Used to monitor in-service customer power that

is billing and to track deployment/

commissioning pace and near-term revenue

The following table presents the values for these metrics as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 (in megawatts).

March 31, 2026

December 31, 2025

Total electric utility power capacity agreements associated with our data center sites under our control as of period end, including capacity that is commissioned for future use.

Used for portfolio planning and utility power allocation discussions.

Total Leasable Customer Power Capacity

Our estimate of the total non-redundant customer IT load that our data center sites could support in the aggregate as of period end, regardless of whether such capacity has been contracted with customers or remains available for sale.

This metric is representative of the amount of power available for customer use in servicing their workloads.

Used to assess total customer‑usable IT load available for leasing, evaluate leased versus unleased capacity, and plan conversion/development sequencing and sales capacity.

Leased Customer Power Capacity

Power capacity that is committed to customers under executed customer contracts, regardless of whether service has commenced as of period end.

Used to monitor signed customer commitments and contracted backlog and to plan future deployment/commissioning requirements.

Unleased Customer Power Capacity

The portion of Total Leasable Customer Power Capacity not committed under customer contracts as of period end.

This metric is calculated as Total Leasable Customer Power Capacity minus Leased Customer Power Capacity.

Used to monitor remaining uncommitted customer IT load and to prioritize incremental contracting and conversion/commissioning plans.

Billable Customer Power Capacity

Portion of Leased Customer Power Capacity for which service has commenced and we are actively billing as of period end.

Used to monitor in-service customer power that is billing and to track deployment/commissioning pace and near-term revenue ramp.

Billable Customer Power Capacity is the primary driver of our Colocation segment revenue in each period, as revenue recognition commences when capacity is delivered and service begins.

The gap between Leased Customer Power Capacity and Billable Customer Power Capacity represents contracted capacity for which we are constructing and commissioning infrastructure, and reflects our near-term revenue growth opportunity as that capacity is placed into service.

Gross Utility Power Capacity and Total Leasable Customer Power Capacity are used primarily for portfolio planning and to evaluate our available capacity for future customer contracting.

The following table presents the values for these metrics as of the dates indicated (in megawatts):

June 30, 2026 March 31, 2026 December 31, 2025

Gross Utility Power Capacity

2,115 1,860 1,426

Total Leasable Customer Power Capacity

1,275 1,275 920

Leased Customer Power Capacity

3 unchanged sentences

We report our financial results in accordance with GAAP.

To supplement our consolidated financial statements, we provide

investors with Adjusted EBITDA, which is a non‑GAAP financial measure.

Adjusted EBITDA is defined as our net (loss) income,

adjusted to eliminate the effect of (i) interest income, interest expense, and other income (expense), net;

(ii) provision for income

To supplement our consolidated financial statements, we provide investors with Adjusted EBITDA, a non‑GAAP financial measure.

Adjusted EBITDA is defined as our net loss, adjusted to eliminate the effect of (i) interest expense (income), net;

(ii) provision for income taxes;

(iii) depreciation and amortization;

(iv) stock-based compensation expense;

(v) loss on disposal and impairment of property,

plant and equipment;

(vi) site demolition costs incurred in connection with the conversion of existing facilities to colocation data

center operations;

(vii) change in fair value of warrant and contingent value rights;

(viii) loss on legal settlements;

(ix) post-emergence

bankruptcy advisory costs incurred related to reorganization, and (x) certain additional non-cash items that do not reflect the

performance of our ongoing business operations.

(v) loss on disposal and impairment of property, plant and equipment;

(vi) loss on remeasurement of assets held for sale;

(vii) loss on contract termination;

(viii) colocation organizational startup costs primarily related to the initial ramp up of new colocation sits and the conversion of existing facilities to colocation data center operations;

(ix) loss on debt extinguishment;

(x) change in fair value of warrant and contingent value rights;

(xi) loss on legal settlements;

(xii) post-emergence bankruptcy advisory costs incurred related to reorganization and (xiii) certain additional non-cash items that do not reflect the performance of our ongoing business operations.

The most directly comparable GAAP measure to Adjusted EBITDA is net loss.

For additional information, including a reconciliation of net (loss) income to Adjusted EBITDA, please refer to the table

We believe Adjusted EBITDA is an important measure because it allows management, investors, and our Board of Directors to

evaluate and compare our operating results, including our return on capital and operating efficiencies, from period-to-period by

making the adjustments described above.

In addition, it provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and

evaluating our results of operations, as well as provides a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of our business, as it

removes the effect of net interest expense, taxes, certain non-cash items, variable charges and timing differences.

Moreover, we have

included Adjusted EBITDA in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q because it is a key measurement used by our management

internally to make operating decisions, including those related to operating expenses, evaluate performance, and perform strategic and

financial planning.

The above items are excluded from our Adjusted EBITDA measure because these items are non-cash in nature or because the

amount and timing of these items are not related to the current results of our core business operations which renders evaluation of our

current performance, comparisons of performance between periods and comparisons of our current performance with our competitors

less meaningful.

However, you should be aware that when evaluating Adjusted EBITDA, we may incur future expenses similar to

those excluded when calculating this measure.

Our presentation of this measure should not be construed as an inference that its future

results will be unaffected by unusual items.

Further, this non-GAAP financial measure should not be considered in isolation from, or

as a substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP.

We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily

on GAAP results and using Adjusted EBITDA on a supplemental basis.

Our computation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be

comparable to other similarly titled measures computed by other companies because not all companies calculate this measure in the

same fashion.

You should review the reconciliation of n et (loss) income to Adjusted EBITDA below and not rely on any single

financial measure to evaluate our business.

The following table presents a reconciliation of n et (loss) income to Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended March 31,

2026 and 2025 (in thousands):

Three Months Ended March 31,

Adjusted EBITDA

Net (loss) income

We believe Adjusted EBITDA is useful to management, investors, and our Board of Directors because it removes the effect of items that are either non-cash in nature, not reflective of our core operating performance, or subject to timing and variability that makes period-to-period comparisons less meaningful.

This includes impairment charges on mining-related assets, which are non-cash and reflect changes in bitcoin market conditions rather than the operating performance of our colocation business.

Adjusted EBITDA is used by management internally to make operating decisions, evaluate performance, and perform strategic and financial planning, including assessment of return on capital and operating efficiencies.

In addition, we believe it provides useful information to investors in understanding and evaluating our results of operations and making period-to-period comparisons of our business, as it removes the effect of interest, taxes, non-cash charges, and other items subject to timing variability.

You should be aware that when evaluating Adjusted EBITDA, we may incur future expenses similar to those when calculating this measure.

Our presentation of this measure should not be construed as an inference that its future results will be unaffected by unusual items.

This measure should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, our condensed consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP.

We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on GAAP results and using Adjusted EBITDA on a supplemental basis.

Our computation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies because not all companies calculate this measure in the same fashion.

You should review the reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA below and not rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business.

The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,

2026 2025 2026 2025

$ (1,155,310) $ (936,799) $ (1,502,498) $ (360,548)

Interest expense (income), net

23,833 (1,185) 28,690 (3,372)

Income tax expense

1,907 158 2,507 363

Depreciation and amortization

15,498 18,756 32,146 38,487

Stock-based compensation expense 13,938 19,533 27,475 32,765

Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment

1,273 4,166 14,911 4,172

Loss on remeasurement of assets held for sale 19,495 — 19,495 —

Impairment of property, plant and equipment

Site conversion demolition costs

— — 266,488 —

Colocation organizational and site startup costs (1)

27,039 11,655 35,704 23,322

Loss on contract termination 41,948 — 41,948 —

Loss on debt extinguishment

5,435 1,377 5,435 1,377

Change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights

1,045,515 909,958 1,076,314 288,494

Loss on legal settlements (2)

Post-emergence bankruptcy advisory costs (3)

397 695 714 1,298

135 207 162 364

Adjusted EBITDA

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 and 2025

The following table sets forth our selected condensed consolidated statements of operations for each of the periods indicated (in

Three Months Ended March 31,

Colocation revenue

Digital asset self-mining revenue

Digital asset hosted mining revenue from customers

Total revenue

Cost of revenue:

Cost of colocation services

Cost of digital asset self-mining

Cost of digital asset hosted mining services

Total cost of revenue

Decrease in fair value of digital assets

Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment

Impairment of property, plant and equipment

Colocation organizational and site startup costs

Selling, general and administrative

Operating loss

Non-operating expense (income), net:

Interest expense (income), net

Change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights

Loss on legal settlements

Other non-operating expense, net

Total non-operating expense (income), net

(Loss) income before income taxes

Income tax expense

Net (loss) income

The following table summarizes gross profit and gross margin by reportable segment for each of the periods indicated (in

Three Months Ended March 31,

Colocation Segment

Colocation gross profit

Colocation gross margin

Digital Asset Self-Mining Segment

Digital asset self-mining gross (loss) profit

Digital asset self-mining gross margin

Digital Asset Hosted Mining Segment

Digital asset hosted mining gross profit

Digital asset hosted mining gross margin

Gross profit represents segment revenue less segment cost of revenue.

Accordingly, the year over year changes in gross profit

and gross margin by segment are primarily driven by the changes in revenue and cost of revenue discussed in the “ Revenue” and

“ Cost of revenue” sections below.

Three Months Ended March 31,

$ 41,103 $ 28,521 $ 49,991 $ 26,722

(1) Included in Colocation organizational and site startup costs are costs associated to Stock-based compensation expense of $4.3 million and $8.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, and $4.6 million and $7.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively.

For the six months ended June 30, 2025, there was also $4.4 million in site conversion demolition costs.

(2) Included in Other non-operating expense, net on the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

(3) Included in Selling, general and administrative on the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025

The following table presents the components of revenue for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,

2026 2025 $ Change 2026 2025 $ Change

Colocation revenue $ 136,669 $ 10,560 $ 126,109 $ 214,208 $ 19,133 $ 195,075

7 unchanged sentences

Total revenue

100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %

Colocation revenue

Colocation revenue consists of fees charged to customers for licensed data center space, power and related services.

contracts, customers generally pay fixed monthly fees based on billable customer power capacity and variable usage‑based charges

and other billable services.

Power fees are passed through to customers without markup and are recognized as revenue on a gross

basis, with a corresponding charge to cost of colocation services.

As a result, changes in power prices can cause fluctuations in

colocation revenue that are not indicative of changes in our underlying colocation margins.

The year over year increase in colocation revenue was primarily attributable to incremental billable customer power capacity at

our Denton, Texas and Marble, North Carolina data centers during the three months ended March 31, 2026 .

Under our contract, the customer generally pays fixed monthly fees based on billable customer power capacity and variable usage‑based charges and other billable services.

Power fees are passed through to our customer without markup and are recognized as revenue on a gross basis, with a corresponding charge to cost of colocation services.

As a result, changes in power prices can cause fluctuations in colocation revenue that are not indicative of changes in our underlying colocation margins.

The increase in colocation revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, was primarily attributable to incremental billable customer power capacity.

Digital asset self-mining revenue

Digital asset self‑mining revenue consists primarily of bitcoin earned from operating our owned mining fleet.

We participate in

mining pools under which we receive consideration based on the hash rate we contribute to the pool.

The year over year decrease in self-mining revenue was driven primarily by lower bitcoin production and lower average

realized bitcoin prices during the three months ended March 31, 2026.

Cost of revenue

Three Months Ended March 31,

We participate in mining pools under which we receive consideration based on the hash rate we contribute to the pool.

The decrease in self-mining revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, was driven primarily by lower bitcoin production and lower average realized bitcoin prices.

Cost of revenue

The following table presents the components of cost of revenue for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,

2026 2025 $ Change 2026 2025 $ Change

Cost of colocation services $ 56,686 $ 9,430 $ 47,256 $ 90,304 $ 17,536 $ 72,768

2 unchanged sentences

Total cost of revenue $ 94,157 $ 73,603 $ 20,554 $ 179,295 $ 144,915 $ 34,380

Cost of revenue includes the costs to operate our colocation, digital asset self‑mining, and digital asset hosted mining

businesses, including power fees, depreciation, personnel and facility-related costs.

Colocation cost of revenue

The year over year increase in cost of colocation services was driven primarily by incremental billable capacity at our Denton,

Texas and Marble, North Carolina data centers during the three months ended March 31, 2026 .

Digital asset self-mining cost of revenue

The year over year decrease in cost of digital asset self-mining was driven primarily by reduced self-mining activity during the

three months ended March 31, 2026 , including lower power consumption resulting from the reallocation of power capacity to

colocation operations and lower depreciation expense as a larger portion of the mining fleet became fully depreciated.

Cost of revenue includes the costs to operate our colocation, digital asset self‑mining, and digital asset hosted mining businesses, including power fees, depreciation, personnel and facility-related costs.

Cost of colocation services

The increase in cost of colocation services for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, was driven primarily by incremental billable capacity, in line with increased colocation revenue.

Cost of digital asset self-mining

The decrease in cost of digital asset self-mining for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, was driven primarily by reduced self-mining activity, including lower power consumption resulting from the reallocation of power capacity to colocation operations and lower depreciation expense.

The following table summarizes gross profit (loss) and gross margin by reportable segment for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,

2026 2025 Change 2026 2025 Change

Colocation Segment

Colocation gross profit $ 79,983 $ 1,130 $ 78,853 $ 123,904 $ 1,597 $ 122,307

Colocation gross margin 59 % 11 % 48 % 58 % 8 % 50 %

Digital Asset Self-Mining Segment

Digital asset self-mining gross profit (loss) $ (12,165) $ 2,835 $ (15,000) $ (29,249) $ 8,844 $ (38,093)

Digital asset self-mining gross margin (56) % 5 % (61) % (57) % 7 % (64) %

Digital Asset Hosted Mining Segment

Digital asset hosted mining gross profit $ 2,226 $ 1,060 $ 1,166 $ 5,495 $ 2,797 $ 2,698

Digital asset hosted mining gross margin 37 % 19 % 18 % 40 % 30 % 10 %

Gross profit (loss) represents segment revenue less segment cost of revenue.

Accordingly, the changes in gross profit (loss) and gross margin by segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, are primarily driven by the changes in revenue and cost of revenue discussed in the “Revenue ” and “Cost of revenue ” sections above.

Operating Expenses

The following table summarizes the components of operating expenses for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,

2026 2025 $ Change 2026 2025 $ Change

Loss (gain) on fair value of digital assets $ 9,368 $ (29,797) $ 39,165 $ 15,926 $ (19,109) $ 35,035

Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment

1,273 4,166 (2,893) 14,911 4,172 10,739

Loss on remeasurement of assets held for sale 19,495 — 19,495 19,495 — 19,495

Impairment of property, plant and equipment

Three Months Ended March 31,

— — — 266,488 — 266,488

Loss on contract termination 41,948 — 41,948 41,948 — 41,948

Colocation organizational and site startup costs 27,039 11,655 15,384 35,704 23,322 12,382

Selling, general and administrative

49,389 45,285 4,104 94,568 78,175 16,393

Total operating expenses $ 148,512 $ 31,309 $ 117,203 $ 489,040 $ 86,560 $ 402,480

Loss (gain) on fair value of digital assets

The loss (gain) on fair value of digital assets reflects the movement in fair value of bitcoin held from our self-mining operations for each period presented.

The loss recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to a gain for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, reflects a decrease in the price of bitcoin during the respective periods.

Loss on remeasurement of assets held for sale

During the three months ended June 30, 2026, we classified certain mining equipment as held for sale and remeasured the assets to fair value less cost to sell, resulting in a $19.5 million loss.

See Note 4 — Property, Plant, and Equipment and Note 9 — Fair Value Measurements for further detail.

Impairment of property, plant and equipment

Percentage of total revenue

During the three months ended March 31, 2026, we recognized non-cash impairment charges of $266.5 million on our mining-

related property, plant and equipment.

The charges resulted from sustained deterioration in bitcoin mining economics during the

quarter, including declines in bitcoin prices, hashprice reaching historic lows, and significant decreases in secondary market values for

mining equipment.

Of the total charge, $151.6 million related to mining equipment whose carrying value exceeded current secondary

market values, and $114.9 million related to mining infrastructure at facilities used in our self-mining operations, whose carrying

values exceeded fair values determined using a discounted cash flow methodology.

No impairment charges were recognized during

the three months ended March 31, 2025 .

During the three months ended March 31, 2026, we recognized non-cash impairment charges of $266.5 million on our mining-related property, plant and equipment.

The charges resulted from sustained deterioration in bitcoin mining economics during the period, including declines in bitcoin prices, hashprice reaching historic lows, and significant decreases in secondary market values for mining equipment.

Of the total charge, $151.6 million related to mining equipment whose carrying value exceeded current secondary market values, and $114.9 million related to mining infrastructure at facilities used in our self-mining operations, whose carrying values exceeded fair values determined using a discounted cash flow methodology.

No impairment charges were recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2026, or during the three and six months ended June 30, 2025.

Loss on contract termination

During the three months ended June 30, 2026, we entered into a termination and settlement agreement with Block, Inc.

and Proto Global LLC to terminate our existing contract and all future delivery obligations of mining equipment thereunder, resulting in a loss of $41.9 million.

We terminated this agreement in connection with the wind-down of our remaining mining obligations as part of our ongoing strategic transition to high-density colocation operations.

Colocation organizational and site startup costs

Colocation organizational and site startup costs are expected to continue declining as a percentage of revenue as our initial CoreWeave facilities reach full operational maturity, though the Company may incur similar costs in future periods in connection with new customer relationships and new site development activities.

Non-Operating Expenses, Net

The following table summarizes the components of non-operating expenses (income), net for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,

2026 2025 $ Change 2026 2025 $ Change

Loss on debt extinguishment $ 5,435 $ 1,377 $ 4,058 $ 5,435 $ 1,377 $ 4,058

Interest expense (income), net 23,833 (1,185) 25,018 28,690 (3,372) 32,062

Change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights 1,045,515 909,958 135,557 1,076,314 288,494 787,820

Three Months Ended March 31,

Other non-operating expense, net 152 207 (55) 662 364 298

Total non-operating expenses, net $ 1,074,935 $ 910,357 $ 164,578 $ 1,111,101 $ 286,863 $ 824,238

Interest expense (income), net

The increase in interest expense (income), net for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, was driven primarily by interest incurred on the $3.30 billion aggregate principal amount of 7.75% Senior Secured Notes issued in May 2026 and on the $1.0 billion Term Loan Facility that was borrowed in March 2026 and repaid in May 2026.

Change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights

Percentage of total revenue

The year over year decrease in change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights shifted from a $621.5 million gain in

the prior year period to a $30.8 million loss in the current period, driven by changes in our stock price during the respective periods .

The increase in change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, was driven by changes in our stock price during the respective periods.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources and Uses of Cash

We finance our operating and capital requirements primarily through a combination of (i) cash and cash equivalents, (ii) cash

generated from operations, (iii) sales of digital assets (bitcoin), subject to market conditions and our treasury strategy, and (iv)

financing activities, including debt financing arrangements.

We also receive customer prepayments under our colocation

arrangements, which are associated with, and are expected to offset a significant portion of, the capital expenditures required to build

out a nd convert facilities for those arrangements.

In March 2026, we entered into the Term Loan Facility, pursuant to which we borrowed the full $500.0 million initially

available under the Credit Agreement.

Subsequently, in March 2026, we entered into the Incremental Amendment, pursuant to which

we borrowed the full $500.0 million incremental commitment.

In April 2026, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Core Scientific Finance priced the private offering of $3.30 billion

aggregate principal amount of 7.75% Secured Notes at an issue price of 99.250% of the principal amount.

In connection with the

offering of Secured Notes, Core Scientific Finance used a portion of the net proceeds to fund a debt service reserve account, and the

remaining proceeds to make a distribution to us.

We used a portion of the net proceeds we received from Core Scientific Finance to

repay in full the outstanding balance under the Term Loan Facility, including accrued interest thereon and fees and expenses in

connection therewith.

The offering of Secured Notes closed on May 6, 2026, and upon such repayment, we terminated the Term Loan

See “Senior Secured Notes Offering” under Recent Developments above for additional details.

During the three months ended March 31, 2026 , we sold 2,385 bitcoin for aggregate proceeds of $208.3 million to fund planned

capital expenditures and other cash requirements.

We will be opportunistic in liquidating the remainder of our bitcoin balance.

Our planned capital expenditures and other cash requirements may require additional external financing.

We may from time to

time seek additional financing to fund our operations and capital expenditures.

If we are unable to obtain financing on acceptable

terms, we may be required to reduce, delay or modify planned expenditures or pursue other alternatives.

We have assessed our current and expected operating and capital expenditure requirements and our current and expected

sources of liquidity, and have determined, based on our forecasted financial results and financial condition as of March 31, 2026 , that

our available liquidity, including cash and cash equivalents and expected operating cash flows and customer funding related to our

colocation arrangements, will be sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.

The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents and the fair value of our digital assets (in thousands):

March 31, 2026

We finance our operating and capital requirements primarily through a combination of cash and cash equivalents, cash generated from operations, customer prepayments received under our colocation arrangements, proceeds from sales of digital assets (bitcoin), and external financing activities, including debt financing arrangements.

Customer prepayments under our colocation arrangements are associated with, and expected to offset a significant portion of, the capital expenditures required to build out and convert facilities for those arrangements.

Based on our assessment of current and expected operating and capital expenditure requirements, we have determined that our available liquidity, including cash and cash equivalents, expected operating cash flows, and customer funding related to our colocation arrangements, will be sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements for at least the next twelve months from the date of this filing.

The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents and the fair value of our digital assets at the dates indicated (in thousands):

June 30, 2026 December 31, 2025

Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,769,735 $ 311,378

Digital assets 49,675 222,000

The following table presents our cash flows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended March 31,

$ 1,819,410 $ 533,378

Term Loan Facility

In March 2026, we entered into a loan facility credit agreement and fully drew a $1.0 billion senior secured loan facility (the “Term Loan Facility”).

On May 6, 2026, we repaid in full all outstanding borrowings under the Term Loan Facility, including accrued interest and fees, using proceeds from the Senior Secured Notes offering described below, and terminated the facility.

As of June 30, 2026, there were no remaining borrowings or obligations outstanding under the Term Loan Facility.

Senior Secured Notes

On May 6, 2026, Core Scientific Finance, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, completed a private offering of $3.30 billion aggregate principal amount of 7.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2031.

Core Scientific Finance used the net proceeds to fund a debt service reserve account and to make a distribution to the Company, a portion of which was used to repay and terminate the Term Loan Facility.

As of June 30, 2026, $345 million remained in the debt service reserve account and is included in Restricted cash, net of current portion on our condensed consolidated balance sheet.

In connection with the Senior Secured Notes offering, we provided an uncapped completion guarantee for the benefit of the noteholders with respect to the completion of specified data center development projects.

This guarantee reflects our commitment to complete the specified development projects and is consistent with our existing contractual construction obligation, which are discussed further below.

The Senior Secured Notes require semi-annual interest payments on May 15 and November 15, beginning November 15, 2026.

Semi-annual principal amortization on May 15 and November 15 will commence on the First Installment Payment Date at an initial annual rate of 11.50% of the $3.30 billion original principal amount.

We also have outstanding $460 million of 2029 Convertible Notes and $625 million of 2031 Convertible Notes.

For maturity dates, amortization schedules, and full terms of all outstanding debt, see Note 7 — Debt to our consolidated financial statements.

Deferred Revenue

Customer prepayments received under our colocation license agreements represent a significant source of operating cash inflows and are recorded as deferred revenue until the related capacity is delivered and revenue is recognized.

Colocation deferred revenue reflects advance payments received from our customer for contracted capacity, including prepaid base license fees received in connection with the customer-funded development of colocation facilities.

During the initial billing period, CoreWeave receives build credits that offset a portion of amounts otherwise due, which affects the timing of cash collection relative to revenue recognition.

Deferred revenue is recognized as revenue as capacity is placed into service over the course of several billing cycles as the prepaid fees are used up.

Hosted mining deferred revenue reflects deposits received from customers in advance of providing equipment deployment, monitoring, and infrastructure services under our hosted mining arrangements.

The following table presents a rollforward of deferred revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2026:

Deferred Revenue from Colocation Services

Deferred Revenue from Hosted Mining Services

Total Deferred Revenue

Balance at December 31, 2025 $ 553,878 $ 1,973 $ 555,851

Cash payments received 181,149 2,154 183,303

Revenue recognized - amounts billed and earned (58,710) (1,972) (60,682)

Non-cash straight line adjustment - base license fees earned but not yet billed (24,029) — (24,029)

Balance at June 30, 2026 $ 652,288 $ 2,155 $ 654,443

The non-cash straight-line adjustment reflects the base license fees that are earned ratably over the contract term under ASC 842 but are not yet due from customer under the contractual billing schedule.

This component reduces colocation deferred revenue and does not represent a cash receipt.

Hosted mining deferred revenue is immaterial to our consolidated balance sheet.

Digital Asset Sales

During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we mined approximately 695 bitcoin, sold 2,385 bitcoin for aggregate proceeds of $208.2 million to fund planned capital expenditures and other cash requirements, and recognized a $15.9 million decrease in fair value, resulting in a closing balance of 848 bitcoin with a fair value of $50 million, compared to 2,537 bitcoin with a fair value of $222 million at December 31, 2025.

We will be opportunistic in monetizing our remaining bitcoin holdings, subject to market conditions and our treasury strategy.

Cash flow Summary

The following table presents our cash flows for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Six Months Ended June 30,

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

$ 230,949 $ (11,041)

Net cash used in investing activities $ (1,182,891) $ (208,624)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities increased to $249.9 million from $(45.0) million in the prior year period,

primarily due to customer prepayments received under our colocation arrangements and proceeds from sales of digital assets.

Net cash used in investing activities increased to $386.7 million from $89.0 million in the prior year period, primarily reflecting

capital expenditures related to our colocation expansion, primarily related to long-lead equipment and other data center development

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities was $971.4 million compared to $(4.2) million in the prior year period,

primarily due to net proceeds from the Company's Term Loan Facility.

Material Cash Requirements

Our material cash requirements from known contractual and other obligations are discussed below on both a short-term and

long-term basis.

Short-Term Cash Requirements

Capital Expenditures and Other Commitments

During the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, we spent $389.2 million and $84.0 million respectively, on capital

expenditures, primarily related to the conversion and expansion of our data center portfolio for colocation operations.

As of March 31,

2026 , we were contractually committed to approximately $1.47 billion , of which $434.0 million w ill be passed through to the

Company’s customer as invoiced .

$ 3,191,955 $ (35,970)

Operating Activities

The improvement of approximately $242.0 million in cash provided by (used in) operating activities was primarily due to:

• Digital asset sales:

$208.2 million of proceeds from sales of digital assets generated by self-mining revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2026, as management elected to monetize the majority of our bitcoin holdings to fund capital requirements.

• Non-cash charges:

While net loss increased $1.1 billion year-over-year, this was substantially offset by a corresponding increase in non-cash charges, most notably the $787.8 million increase in fair value of warrant and contingent value rights liabilities and the $266.5 million impairment of property, plant and equipment recognized in the current period.

Continued growth and scaling of our colocation operations, including higher billable customer power capacity, increased customer prepayments received under our colocation arrangement, and the associated operating cash flows generated as our colocation business ramps towards full operational capacity also contributed to the overall improvement in operating cash flows.

Investing Activities

The increase in cash used in investing activities reflects higher capital expenditures of $954.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to $205.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, driven by our conversion and expansion of data center infrastructure for colocation operations.

Of the $954.2 million of capital expenditures, $180.9 million was funded by CoreWeave pursuant to its existing colocation service agreement.

In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2026, we paid $232.5 million in connection with the acquisition of land and development rights in Hunt County, Texas.

See Note 3 — Asset Acquisition for further detail.

Financing Activities

The improvement in cash provided by (used in) financing activities was primarily driven by $3.3 billion in gross proceeds from the issuance of the Senior Secured Notes in May 2026, partially offset by the repayment of $1.0 billion of outstanding borrowings under the Term Loan Facility.

As of June 30, 2026, we were contractually committed to approximately $1.0 billion of future cash expenditures under outstanding purchase and construction commitments, of which $264 million will be passed through to our customer as invoiced.

These commitments relate to the remaining build-out at existing customer conversion sites, our recently acquired Hunt County, Texas campus, and new development activities undertaken for prospective customers.

Substantially all of these expenditures are expected to occur within the next 12 months.

Operating Leases

For our operating lease payment obligations due within the next 12 months, see Note 5 — Leases to our consolidated financial

statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional details.

Long-Term Cash Requirements

Senior Secured Notes

In May 2026, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Core Scientific Finance, issued $3.3 billion aggregate principal amount of

7.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2031.

For the maturity date, principal amount and terms of these notes, see "Senior Secured Notes

Offering" under Recent Developments above and Note 6 — Debt to our consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Convertible Notes

We have outstanding 3.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2029 and 0.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2031.

maturity dates, principal amounts, and terms of these instruments, see Note 6 — Debt to our consolidated financial statements in Item

1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q .

Capital Expenditures

We expect to incur significant capital expenditures beyond the next 12 months as we continue to convert our remaining data

center portfolio to colocation infrastructure and pursue new site acquisitions to expand our footprint.

The pace and magnitude of these

expenditures will depend on customer deployment schedules, the timing of site conversions, and the availability and cost of financing.

Operating Leases

For our operating lease payment obligations due beyond the next 12 months, see Note 5 — Leases to our consolidated financial

statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional details.

We expect to incur significant capital expenditures beyond the next 12 months as we continue to develop our data center portfolio.

We also have ongoing operating lease obligations for our data center and office facilities;

for the amounts and timing of those obligations, see Note 6 — Leases to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

We may from time to time seek additional financing to fund our operations and capital expenditures.

If we are unable to obtain financing on acceptable terms, we may be required to reduce, delay, or modify planned expenditures or pursue other alternatives.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The critical accounting estimates, assumptions, judgments and the related policies that we believe have the most significant

impact on our consolidated financial statements are described below.

The critical accounting estimates, assumptions, judgments and the related policies that we believe have the most significant impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements are described below.

Property, Plant, and Equipment

Our mining-related property, plant, and equipment involves significant estimates, including the determination of useful lives

and the evaluation of recoverability and fair value.

These estimates require judgment about future bitcoin mining economics, including

technology improvements, bitcoin prices, hashprice, power prices, secondary market values for mining equipment, and the

assumptions underlying fair value measurements such as discount rates and projected cash flows.

During the three months ended

March 31, 2026 , we recognized significant impairment charges on our mining-related assets (see Note 3 — Property, Plant, and

Equipment and Note 8 — Fair Value Measurements t o our consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly

Report on Form 10-Q).

The fair value of mining infrastructure is particularly sensitive to the discount rate applied to projected cash

refer to Note 8 for the significant unobservable inputs used in the Level 3 measurement.

Our mining-related property, plant, and equipment involves significant estimates, including the determination of useful lives and the evaluation of recoverability and fair value.

These estimates require judgment about future bitcoin mining economics, including technology improvements, bitcoin prices, hashprice, power prices, secondary market values for mining equipment, and the assumptions underlying fair value measurements such as discount rates and projected cash flows.

During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we recognized significant impairment charges on our mining-related assets (see Note 4 — Property, Plant, and Equipment and Note 9 — Fair Value Measurements to our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q).

Stock-Based Compensation

We have outstanding equity awards that include performance conditions, the achievement of which must be assessed by

management at each reporting date.

Compensation expense for these awards is recognized based on the estimated number of awards

expected to vest, applying a cumulative catch-up adjustment when those estimates change.

The assessment of probable achievement

requires significant judgment, including assumptions about our infrastructure deployment progress, customer pipeline activity, and a

degree of Compensation Committee discretion.

Given the range of potential payout outcomes, changes in management's probability

assessments could result in material adjustments to stock-based compensation expense recognized in future periods.

We have outstanding equity awards that include performance conditions, the achievement of which must be assessed by management at each reporting date.

Compensation expense for these awards is recognized based on the estimated number of awards expected to vest, applying a cumulative catch-up adjustment when those estimates change.

The assessment of probable achievement requires significant judgment, including assumptions about our infrastructure deployment progress, customer pipeline activity, and a degree of Compensation Committee discretion.

Given the range of potential payout outcomes, changes in management's probability assessments could result in material adjustments to stock-based compensation expense recognized in future periods.

Management believes its current estimates are reasonable based on available information.

Actual results may differ, and any

such differences could materially impact our financial condition and results of operations.

Actual results may differ, and any such differences could materially impact our financial condition and results of operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion of new accounting standards relevant to our business, refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting

Policies to our consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q .

For a discussion of new accounting standards relevant to our business, refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.

What changed 10-Q

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis