Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion and
analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes appearing
elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. This discussion contains forward-looking statements reflecting our current expectations that involve risks
and uncertainties. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, available on the Security
and Exchange Commission's (“SEC”) EDGAR website at www.sec.gov, for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions
associated with these statements. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those discussed in our forward-looking
statements as a result of many factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We make forward-looking statements under the “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in other sections of this Form 10-Q. In some cases,
you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “might,” “should,” “would,”
“could,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,”
“estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue,” and the negative of these terms and
other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements, which are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions
about us, may include projections of our future financial performance based on our growth strategies and anticipated trends in our business.
These statements are only predictions based on our current expectations and projections about future events. There are important factors
that could cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from the results, level of activity,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In particular, you should consider the numerous risks
and uncertainties described under Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, our subsequent
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and in other filings made by us from time to time with the SEC.
While we believe we have identified material risks,
these risks and uncertainties are not exhaustive. Other sections of this Form 10-Q may describe additional factors that could adversely
impact our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks
and uncertainties emerge from time to time, and it is not possible to predict all risks and uncertainties, nor can we assess the impact
of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially
from those contained in any forward-looking statements.
Although we believe the expectations reflected
in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, level of activity, performance or achievements.
Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any of these forward-looking statements.
You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. We are under no duty to update any of these forward-looking
statements after the date of this Form 10-Q to conform our prior statements to actual results or revised expectations, and we do not intend
to do so.
Forward-looking statements include, but are not
limited to, statements about:
·
our ability to maintain our listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market;
·
our ability to obtain additional funding to develop our product candidates;
·
the need to obtain regulatory approval of our product candidates;
·
the success of our clinical trials through all phases of clinical development;
·
compliance with obligations under intellectual property licenses with third parties;
13
·
any delays in regulatory review and approval of product candidates in clinical development;
·
our ability to commercialize our product candidates;
·
market acceptance of our product candidates;
·
competition from existing products or new products that may emerge;
·
potential product liability claims;
·
our dependency on third-party manufacturers to supply or manufacture our products;
·
our ability to establish or maintain collaborations, licensing or other arrangements;
·
our ability and third parties’ abilities to protect intellectual property rights;
·
our ability to adequately support future growth; and
·
our ability to attract and retain key personnel to manage our business effectively.
We caution you not to place undue reliance on the
forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q or any other document, which speak only as of their respective dates.
You should not rely upon forward-looking statements
as predictions of future events. Our actual results and financial condition may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking
statements. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. Although we believe that the expectations
reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.
Therefore, you should not rely on any of the forward-looking statements. In addition, with respect to all of our forward-looking statements,
we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995.
Overview
We are a clinical pharmaceutical company organized
as a Nevada corporation in July 2017 to focus on the development of anti-cancer drug candidates for the treatment of brain and central
nervous system tumors, based on intellectual property that we license under license agreements with Cortice Biosciences, Inc. (“Cortice”)
and own pursuant to a collaboration and asset purchase agreement with Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Reata”).
We believe our drug candidates, TPI 287 and Berubicin,
may be significant developments in the treatment of Glioblastoma and other CNS malignancies, and if approved by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (“FDA”), could give Glioblastoma patients important new therapeutic alternatives to the current standard of
care. Glioblastomas are tumors that arise from astrocytes, which are star-shaped cells making up the supportive tissue of the brain. These
tumors are usually highly malignant (cancerous) because the cells reproduce quickly, and they are supported by a large network of blood
vessels. Berubicin is an anthracycline, which is a class of drugs that are among the most powerful and extensively used chemotherapy drugs
known. TPI 287 is an abeotaxane, and is related to the family of common chemotherapy drugs known as taxanes. Based on limited clinical
and preclinical data, we believe TPI 287 is the first taxane that appears to cross the blood brain barrier (“BBB”) in significant
concentrations targeting brain cancer cells. Based on clinical and preclinical data, Berubicin is the first anthracycline that appears
to cross the BBB in significant concentrations targeting brain cancer cells. While our focus is currently on the development of TPI 287
and Berubicin, we are also in the process of attempting to secure intellectual property rights to additional compounds that we plan to
develop into drugs to treat CNS and other cancers.
14
TPI 287 has been granted Orphan Drug Designation
(“ODD”) status by the FDA. ODD from the FDA is available for drugs targeting diseases with less than 200,000 cases per year.
ODD may enable market exclusivity of 7 years from the date of approval of a New Drug Application (“NDA”) in the United States.
During that period the FDA generally could not approve another product containing the same drug for the same designated indication. Orphan
drug exclusivity will not bar approval of another product under certain circumstances, including if a subsequent product with the same
active ingredient for the same indication is shown to be clinically superior to the approved product on the basis of greater efficacy
or safety, or providing a major contribution to patient care, or if the company with orphan drug exclusivity is not able to meet market
demand. The ODD strengthens our intellectual property protections although the Company is exploring if there are other patents that could
be filed related to TPI 287 to extend additional protections.
TPI 287 is an abeotaxane and is an investigational
chemotherapy agent classified as a third-generation taxane derivative. It was developed to address some of the limitations of earlier
taxanes like paclitaxel (Taxol) and docetaxel (Taxotere), particularly issues related to drug resistance and poor penetration of the BBB.
As a synthetic, lipophilic compound, TPI 287 is designed to be brain-penetrant, potentially allowing it to reach CNS tumors more effectively
than its predecessors. Like other taxanes, TPI 287’s mechanism of action is to stabilize microtubules, which disrupts cell division
and induces apoptosis. However, one of its notable advantages is its reduced susceptibility to drug efflux pumps such as P-glycoprotein
(P-gp), a common mechanism by which cancer cells develop resistance to chemotherapy. This feature gives TPI 287 potential utility in treating
drug-resistant cancers in the CNS.
TPI 287 has been studied in early-phase clinical
trials (Phase I and II) in over 300 patients for several indications, including Glioblastoma, metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases,
non-small cell lung cancer (“NSCLC”), castration-resistant prostate cancer, and neuroblastoma. TPI 287 represents a promising
candidate for treating cancers involving the CNS, as well as those that have become resistant to traditional taxane therapies. While it
has shown promise in limited clinical trials, further clinical development is necessary to determine its future in neuro-oncology.
Berubicin was discovered at The University of Texas
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center by Dr. Waldemar Priebe, the founder of the Company. Through a series of transactions, Berubicin was initially
licensed to Reata. Reata initiated several Phase I clinical trials with Berubicin for CNS malignancies, one of which was for malignant
gliomas, but subsequently allowed their Investigational New Drug (“IND”) with the FDA to lapse for strategic reasons. This
required us to obtain a new IND for Berubicin before beginning further clinical trials. On December 17, 2020, we announced that our IND
application with the FDA for Berubicin for the treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme was in effect. We initiated this trial for patient
enrollment during the second quarter of 2021 with the first patient dosed during the third quarter of 2021 to investigate the efficacy
of Berubicin in adults with Glioblastoma Multiforme who have failed first-line therapy. The first patient on the trial was treated during
the third quarter of 2021. Correspondence between the Company and the FDA resulted in a trial design with overall survival (OS) as the
primary endpoint of the study. OS is a rigorous endpoint that the FDA has recognized as a basis for approval of oncology drugs when a
statistically significant improvement can be shown relative to a randomized control arm.
On March 25, 2025, CNS released topline data from
a primary analysis of a clinical trial being conducted to evaluate the efficacy of Berubicin in patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme
who have failed primary treatment for their disease. The trial compared the efficacy of Berubicin to that of Lomustine, a current standard
of care in this setting, with a 2 to 1 randomization of the 252 patients to Berubicin or Lomustine. Patients receiving Berubicin were
administered a 2-hour IV infusion of 7.5 mg/m2 berubicin hydrochloride daily for three consecutive days followed by 18 days off (a 21-day
cycle). Lomustine is administered orally once every six weeks. The trial design included a pre-planned, non-binding interim futility analysis.
We reached the criteria required by the study protocol to conduct this interim futility analysis, which an independent Data Safety Monitoring
Board (“DSMB”) was responsible for conducting. The DSMB’s charter mandated that they review the primary endpoint, Overall
Survival, as well as secondary endpoints and safety data to determine whether the efficacy data for the risk-benefit profile warrants
modification or discontinuation of the study. On December 18, 2023, we released the DSMB’s recommendation which was to continue
the study without modification. On March 25, 2025, we released topline data showed that although Berubicin produced clinically relevant
outcomes that appear to be comparable (although the trial was not powered to determine non-inferiority) to Lomustine across multiple endpoints,
it did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in overall survival, the primary endpoint. Nevertheless, given the dearth
of alternative approved therapies for GBM, we believe Berubicin has demonstrated potential value as a possible treatment for Glioblastoma.
As such we are currently evaluating whether any potential paths forward exist for the program. Any such path will be planned and executed
in consultation with the FDA. Even if Berubicin is approved, there is no assurance that patients will choose an infusion treatment, as
compared to the current standard of care, which requires oral administration.
15
We do not have manufacturing facilities and all
manufacturing activities are contracted out to third parties. Additionally, we do not have a sales organization.
On November 21, 2017, we entered into a Collaboration
and Asset Purchase Agreement with Reata (the “Reata Agreement”). Pursuant to the Reata Agreement we purchased all of Reata’s
intellectual property and development data regarding Berubicin, including all trade secrets, knowhow, confidential information and other
intellectual property rights.
On December 28, 2017, we obtained the rights to
a worldwide, exclusive royalty-bearing, license to the chemical compound commonly known as Berubicin from Houston Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(“HPI”) in an agreement we refer to as the HPI License. HPI is affiliated with our founder, Dr. Priebe. Under the HPI License
we obtained the exclusive right to develop certain chemical compounds for use in the treatment of cancer anywhere in the world. In the
HPI License we agreed to pay HPI: (i) development fees of $750,000 over a three-year period beginning November 2019; (ii) a 2% royalty
on net sales; (iii) a $50,000 per year license fee; (iv) milestone payments of $100,000 upon the commencement of a Phase II trial and
$1.0 million upon the approval of a New Drug Application (“NDA”) for Berubicin; and (v) one share of our common stock. The
patents we licensed from HPI expired in March 2020. On March 23, 2025, the Company terminated the HPI License.
On June 10, 2020, the FDA granted Orphan Drug Designation
for Berubicin for the treatment of malignant gliomas. The ODD now constitutes our primary intellectual property protections related to
Berubicin although the Company is exploring other patents that could be filed related to Berubicin to extend additional protections. We
believe we have all rights and intellectual property necessary to develop Berubicin. As stated earlier, it is our plan to obtain additional
intellectual property covering other compounds which, subject to the receipt of additional financing, may be developed into drugs for
brain and other cancers.
On July 29, 2024, we entered into an Exclusive
License Agreement and Stock Purchase Agreement (collectively, the “Cortice Agreements”) with Cortice pursuant to which Cortice
granted us an exclusive license to the intellectual property rights related to certain patents around the compound TPI 287 in the United
States, Canada, Mexico and Japan. The term of the license will expire, other than due to a breach of the Cortice Agreements, at the end
of the royalty term with respect to any licensed product in any of the included territories, which begins upon the first commercial sale
in such territory and ends on the latest of (i) ten years after such sale, (ii) the expiration of regulatory or marketing exclusivity
for such licensed product in such country, or (c) the expiration of the last to expire valid patent claim in such country covering such
licensed product.
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2025 Compared
to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2024
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expense was approximately
$1,242,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to approximately $1,412,000 for the comparable period in 2024. The decrease
in general and administrative expense is attributable to decreases of approximately $36,000 in legal and professional expenses, $19,000
in travel expenses, $195,000 in stock-based compensation, which were offset by increases of approximately $51,000 in compensation expense
and $29,000 in insurance expense.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development expense was approximately $1,167,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to approximately $1,117,000 for the comparable period in 2024. The increase in research and
development expense during the period is primarily attributable to declining trial costs on the Berubicin trial offset by expenditures
preparing for a TPI 287 trial including drug manufacturing.
16
Net Loss
The net loss for the three months ended June 30,
2025 was approximately $2,375,000 compared to approximately $2,531,000 for the comparable period in 2024. The change in net loss is primarily
attributable to declining trial costs on the Berubicin trial.
Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 Compared
to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expense was approximately
$2,337,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to approximately $2,526,000 for the comparable period in 2024. The decrease
in general and administrative expense is attributable to decreases of approximately $316,000 in stock-based compensation, $106,000 in
marketing and advertising expenses, which were offset by increases of approximately $40,000 in legal and professional expenses, $62,000
in travel expenses, $105,000 in compensation expense and $26,000 in other expenses.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development expense was approximately
$4,410,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to approximately $3,547,000 for the comparable period in 2024. The increase
in research and development expense during the period is primarily attributable to timing of trial costs on the Berubicin trial.
Net Loss
The net loss for the six months ended June 30,
2025 was approximately $6,676,000 compared to approximately $6,076,000 for the comparable period in 2024. The change in net loss is primarily
attributable to timing of trial costs on the Berubicin trial partially offset by lower G&A expenses.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
On June 30, 2025, we had cash of approximately
$12,130,000 and we had a working capital of approximately $12,755,000. We fund our operations from proceeds from equity sales.
On July 26, 2024, we entered into a Sales Agreement
(the “AGP ATM Sales Agreement”) with A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners (“AGP”). During the six months ended June
30, 2025, we sold 127,582 shares of common stock pursuant to the AGP ATM Sales Agreement for net proceeds of approximately $9 million.
As of June 30, 2025, we had sold 210,230 shares of common stock pursuant to the AGP ATM Sales Agreement for net proceeds of approximately
$22.8 million.
On May 13, 2025, the Company entered into a placement
agency agreement with AGP for the public offering of (i) 27,084 shares) of common stock; (ii) pre-funded warrants to purchase 302,298
shares of common stock (the “Pre-Funded Warrants”); and (iii) Series F Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 329,381
shares of common stock (the “Common Warrants”). The net proceeds from the offering were approximately $4.5 million.
17
We estimate that we have sufficient working capital
to take us into the second half of 2026. At that point, we expect to have already initiated a trial of TPI 287, as well as completed the
Berubicin trial including its final analysis. In addition, we have working capital to fund our operations during the intervening period
(with such operations estimated at $4.5 to $5.0 million per annum). We do not currently have a firm trial design for TPI 287 so estimates
of development cost are not available, however, regardless of trial design, the cost of bringing TPI 287 to regulatory approval for marketing
will require significant additional financing. The timing and costs of clinical trials are difficult to predict and as such the foregoing
estimates may prove to be inaccurate. We have no commitments for such additional needed financing and will likely be required to raise
such financing through the sale of additional equity or debt securities.
We will need to raise significant
additional capital in the future in order to meet our future obligations and execute our business plan. If we are unable to raise sufficient
funds, we will be required to develop and implement an alternative plan to further extend payables, reduce overhead or scale back our
business plan until sufficient additional capital is raised to support further operations. There can be no assurance that such a plan
will be successful and if it is not successful we may need to cease operations entirely.
Summary of Cash Flows
Cash used in operating activities
Net cash used in operating activities was approximately
$8,585,000 and $4,842,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and mainly included payments made for clinical
trial costs, drug manufacturing and development, officer compensation, insurance, marketing and professional fees to our consultants,
attorneys and accountants.
Cash provided by financing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was approximately
$14,254,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, related to the sale of common stock, which were offset by the repayment of notes payable.
Net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $5,785,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2024, related to the sale of
common stock and exercise of warrants, which were offset by the repayment of notes payable.
Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2025, we did not have any relationships
with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities,
established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Purchase Commitments
We do not have any material commitments for capital
expenditures, although we are required to pay certain milestones fees to Reata and Cortice as described in the section “Overview”
above.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments
that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements, including the notes thereto. As a result, management is required to routinely
make judgments and estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. Actual results may differ from these estimates
under different conditions or assumptions. Management determined there were no critical accounting estimates.
18
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.