BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. 10-Q

BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc._June 30, 2026 Table of Contents ​ ​ UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (Mark One) ​ ☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 ​ For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2026 ​ OR ​ ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 ​ For the transition period from to ​ Commission File Number: 001-38410 BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) ​ ​ ​ ​ Delaware 82-1386754 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) ​ ​ 555 Long Wharf Drive ​ New Haven , CT 06511 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) ​ ( 475 ) 238-6837 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) ​ N/A (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: ​ Title of each class ​ Trading Symbol(s) ​ Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock , $0.001 par value per share ​ BTAI ​ Nasdaq Capital Market ​ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ⌧ No ◻ ​ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ⌧ No ◻ ​ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. ​ Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐ ​ ​ Non-accelerated filer ☒ Smaller reporting company ☒ ​ ​ ​ Emerging growth company ☐ ​ If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐ ​ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒ ​ ​ The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding at August 11, 2026 was 31,305,499 . ​ ​ ​ ​ Table of Contents Table of Contents ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Page PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION ​ ​ Forward Looking Statements 3 ​ Summary Risk Factors 4 Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited) 7 ​ Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 7 ​ Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 8 ​ Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 9 ​ Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 10 ​ Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 11 Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 36 Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 62 Item 4. Controls and Procedures 62 ​ ​ ​ PART II OTHER INFORMATION ​ Item 1. Legal Proceedings 63 Item 1A. Risk Factors 63 Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 131 Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 131 Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 131 Item 5. Other Information 131 Item 6. Exhibits 133 Signatures 136 ​ ​ ​ 2 Table of Contents FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Quarterly Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “designed,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, though not all forward-looking statements use these words or expressions. All statements contained in this Quarterly Report, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding: ● our ability to raise additional capital and continue as a going concern; ● our ability to properly service and/or re-negotiate the terms of our Credit Agreement with Oaktree; ● our ability to execute plans to explore strategic alternatives; ● our sales strategy for IGALMI ® ; ● our ability to stay listed on the Nasdaq Capital market; ● compliance with covenants under our financing arrangements; ● developments relating to our SERENITY and TRANQUILITY programs; ● the size of our total addressable markets and related underlying estimates; ● our plans relating to clinical trials and marketing applications for our product candidates; ● our plans to research, develop and commercialize our current and future product candidates; ● our plans to seek to enter into collaborations for the development and commercialization of certain product candidates; ● the potential benefits of any future collaboration; ● the timing of and our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approvals for our product candidates; ● the timing of and results of discussions we have with regulators; ● the rate and degree of market acceptance, clinical utility, number of prescribers and formulary wins of IGALMI ® and any product candidates for which we receive marketing approval; ● our commercialization, marketing and manufacturing capabilities and strategy, including the potential benefits from any advertising campaigns; ● our participation in, and any potential benefits from, events, conferences, presentations and conventions; ● our intellectual property position and strategy; ● our estimates regarding expenses, future revenue, capital requirements and need for additional financing; ● potential investments in, or other strategic options for, our subsidiary, OnkosXcel Therapeutics, LLC (“OnkosXcel”); ● developments relating to our competitors and our industry; ● the impact of government laws and regulations; ● developments related to legal proceedings and investigations; and ● our relationship with BioXcel LLC. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees, but involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, those listed under “Summary Risk Factors,” Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” and Part I, Item 2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. These and other important factors discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements made in this filing. Given these uncertainties, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. While we may elect to update forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we disclaim any obligation to do so, even if subsequent events cause our views to change. As used in this Quarterly Report, unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” the “Company” or “BTI” refer to BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. and “BioXcel LLC” refers to the Company’s former parent company, BioXcel LLC and its predecessor, BioXcel Corporation. All brand names or trademarks appearing in this Quarterly Report are the property of their respective owners, including IGALMI ® , which is a trademark of BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. 3 Table of Contents We may use our website as a distribution channel for material information about the Company. Financial and other important information regarding the Company is routinely posted on and accessible through the Investors & Media section of its website at www.bioxceltherapeutics.com . In addition, you may automatically receive email alerts and other information about the Company when you enroll your email address by visiting the “Email Alerts” option under the News / Events menu of the Investors & Media section of our website at www.bioxceltherapeutics.com . The information contained in, or accessible through, our website does not constitute part of this quarterly report and the inclusion of our website address in this quarterly report is an inactive textual reference only. ​ ​ SUMMARY RISK FACTORS Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those described in Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report. You should carefully consider these risks and uncertainties when investing in our common stock. The principal risks and uncertainties affecting our business include the following: ● If we do not complete a strategic transaction, or do not receive sufficient financing from other sources of equity or debt financings, we may be forced to file for bankruptcy, wind down our operations, or pursue a dissolution or liquidation. We will require substantial additional financing to service our debt facilities and achieve our goals, and a failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed could force us to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or commercialization efforts. ● We have identified conditions and events that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. ● We have a limited operating history and have not generated substantial product revenues to date, which may make it difficult to evaluate the success of our business to date and to assess our future viability. ● We have incurred significant operating losses since inception and anticipate that we will continue to incur substantial operating losses for the foreseeable future and may never achieve or maintain profitability. ● We will need substantial additional funding, and if we are unable to raise capital when needed, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or commercialization efforts or otherwise seek strategic alternatives. ● If we do not maintain compliance with the listing standards of the Nasdaq Capital Market, Nasdaq may delist our common stock from trading on its exchange, which could limit investors' ability to make transactions in our securities and subject us to additional trading restrictions. ● We have significant indebtedness and other contractual obligations that could impair our liquidity, restrict our ability to do business and thereby harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. We may not have sufficient cash flow from operations to satisfy our obligations under the Credit Agreement. ● Our strategic clinical reprioritization and other workforce reductions in force may not achieve our intended outcome. ● We have limited experience in drug discovery and drug development. ● Developments relating to our TRANQUILITY II Phase 3 trial may impact the timing of our development plans for, and prospects for seeking or obtaining regulatory approval of, BXCL501 for the acute treatment of agitation (non-daily) associated with dementia in patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease and may also subject us to additional risks and uncertainties, including regulatory, stockholder or other actions, loss of investor confidence and negative impacts on the trading price of our common stock. ● In the near term, we are dependent on the success of IGALMI ® , and our lead product candidate, BXCL501. If we are unable to complete the clinical development of or obtain marketing approval for our product candidates 4 Table of Contents or successfully commercialize IGALMI ® or our lead product candidate, either alone or with a collaborator, or if we experience significant delays in doing so, our business could be substantially harmed. ● Interim “top-line” and preliminary data from our clinical trials that we announce or publish from time to time may change as more patient data become available and are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final data. ● The regulatory approval processes of the United States (“U.S.”) Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), and comparable foreign authorities are lengthy, time consuming, expensive and inherently unpredictable, and if we are ultimately unable to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates, our business will be substantially harmed. ● Clinical trials are expensive, difficult to design, difficult to conduct and involve an uncertain outcome. ● We depend on enrollment of patients in our clinical trials to continue development of our product candidates. If we are unable to enroll patients in our clinical trials, our research and development efforts could be adversely affected. ● Our estimated number of episodes of agitation and our corresponding estimated total addressable market are subject to inherent challenges and uncertainties. If we have overestimated the number of episodes or the size of our total addressable market for our current and potential future products or product candidates, or if any approval that we obtain is based on a narrower definition of the patient population, our revenue and ability to achieve profitability may be harmed. ● The discovery and development of product candidates based on EvolverAI, BioXcel LLC’s proprietary pharmaceutical discovery and development engine, as well as and our own AI platform is novel and unproven, and we do not know whether we will be able to develop any products of commercial value. ● Regulators may limit our ability to develop or implement our proprietary AI algorithms and/or may eliminate or restrict the confidentiality of our proprietary technology, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. ● Although the FDA has approved IGALMI ® for the acute treatment of agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar I or II disorder, we will still face extensive and ongoing regulatory requirements and obligations for IGALMI ® and for any product candidates for which we obtain approval. ● Although we obtained FDA approval for IGALMI ® , our products and product candidates may not be accepted by physicians or the medical community in general, and there may be insufficient insurance coverage and reimbursement. ● If we are found in violation of federal, state or foreign health care “fraud and abuse” laws, we may be required to pay significant fines and penalties, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. ● We continue to depend on BioXcel LLC to provide us with certain services for our business. ● We are substantially dependent on third parties for the manufacture of our clinical supplies of our product candidates, and our commercial supplies of IGALMI ® , and we intend to rely on third parties to produce commercial supplies of any other approved product candidate. ● We rely on third parties to conduct our preclinical and clinical trials. If these third parties do not successfully perform their contractual legal and regulatory duties or meet expected deadlines, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our product candidates and our business could be substantially harmed. 5 Table of Contents ● Data breaches or cyber-attacks could disrupt our business operations, information technology systems, and financial results, or result in the loss or exposure of confidential or sensitive Company information. ● We are and may in the future be subject to legal proceedings, claims and investigations in or outside the ordinary course of business. Such proceedings, claims and investigations could be costly and time-consuming to defend and could result in unfavorable outcomes, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition, and negatively affect the price of our common stock. ● Unfavorable global political or economic events and conditions could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. ● We face risks associated with the increased scrutiny relating to environmental, social and governance matters. ● It is difficult and costly to protect our proprietary rights, and we may not be able to ensure their protection. TRADEMARKS, TRADE NAMES AND SERVICE MARKS This Quarterly Report includes our trademarks, trade names and service marks, including, without limitation, “IGALMI ® ” and our logo, which are our property and are protected under applicable intellectual property laws. Solely for convenience, trademarks, trade names and service marks may appear in this Quarterly Report without the ® , TM and SM symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we or the applicable owner forgo or will not assert, to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law, our rights or the rights of any applicable licensors to these trademarks, trade names and service marks. We do not intend our use or display of other parties’ trademarks, trade names or service marks to imply, and such use or display should not be construed to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by, these other parties. INDUSTRY AND OTHER DATA Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this Quarterly Report concerning our industry and the markets in which we operate, including our general expectations, market position and market opportunity, is based on our management’s estimates and research, as well as industry and general publications and research, surveys and studies conducted by third parties. While we believe the information from these third-party publications, research, surveys and studies included in this Quarterly Report is reliable, we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information, and we have not independently verified this information. Management’s estimates are derived from publicly available information, their knowledge of our industry and their assumptions based on such information and knowledge, which we believe to be reasonable. This data involves a number of assumptions and limitations which are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in this Quarterly Report under “Forward-Looking Statements” and Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors.” These and other factors could cause our future performance and market expectations to differ materially from our assumptions and estimates. ​ 6 Table of Contents PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements BIOXCEL THERAPEUTICS, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ June 30, ​ December 31, ​ ​ 2026 ​ 2025 ASSETS ​ ​ ​ ​ Current assets ​ ​ ​ ​ Cash and cash equivalents ​ $ 12,841 ​ $ 28,415 Restricted cash ​ ​ 960 ​ ​ 342 Accounts receivable, net ​ ​ 82 ​ 233 Inventory ​ 483 ​ 722 Prepaid expenses ​ 3,074 ​ 4,028 Other current assets ​ 11,260 ​ 10,945 Total current assets ​ ​ 28,700 ​ ​ 44,685 Property and equipment, net ​ 99 ​ 175 Operating lease right-of-use assets ​ ​ — ​ ​ 56 Total assets ​ $ 28,799 ​ $ 44,916 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT) EQUITY ​ ​ ​ ​ Current liabilities ​ ​ ​ ​ Accounts payable ​ $ 18,783 ​ $ 14,701 Accrued expenses ​ 3,921 ​ 4,341 Current portion of long-term debt ​ ​ 104,451 ​ ​ 24,931 Due to related parties ​ 157 ​ 138 Other current liabilities ​ ​ 9,837 ​ ​ 9,815 Total current liabilities ​ ​ 137,149 ​ ​ 53,926 Derivative liabilities ​ ​ 7,110 ​ ​ 1,790 Long-term debt ​ ​ — ​ ​ 84,663 Total liabilities ​ ​ 144,259 ​ ​ 140,379 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Commitments and contingencies (Note 16) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Stockholders' (deficit) equity ​ ​ ​ ​ Preferred stock, $ 0.001 par value, 10,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 ​ ​ — ​ ​ — Common stock, $ 0.001 par value, 200,000 shares authorized as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025; 31,305 and 22,328 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively ​ ​ 31 ​ ​ 76 Additional paid-in-capital ​ 632,007 ​ 624,555 Accumulated deficit ​ ( 747,498 ) ​ ( 720,094 ) Total stockholders' (deficit) equity ​ ​ ( 115,460 ) ​ ​ ( 95,463 ) Total liabilities and stockholders' (deficit) equity ​ $ 28,799 ​ $ 44,916 ​ The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. ​ 7 Table of Contents BIOXCEL THERAPEUTICS, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) (unaudited) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Three months ended June 30, ​ Six months ended June 30, ​ ​ ​ ​ 2026 ​ ​ ​ 2025 ​ ​ ​ 2026 ​ ​ ​ 2025 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Revenues ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Product revenue, net ​ $ 182 ​ $ 120 ​ $ 388 ​ $ 288 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Operating expenses ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Cost of goods sold ​ $ 22 ​ $ 107 ​ $ 305 ​ $ 121 Research and development ​ ​ 3,164 ​ ​ 10,256 ​ ​ 6,119 ​ ​ 14,810 Selling, general and administrative ​ 7,189 ​ 5,609 ​ 14,380 ​ 11,308 Total operating expenses ​ $ 10,375 ​ $ 15,972 ​ $ 20,804 ​ $ 26,239 Loss from operations ​ $ ( 10,193 ) ​ $ ( 15,852 ) ​ $ ( 20,416 ) ​ $ ( 25,951 ) Other (income) expense ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Interest expense ​ 4,257 ​ 4,222 ​ 8,455 ​ 8,215 Interest income ​ ​ ( 131 ) ​ ​ ( 230 ) ​ ​ ( 342 ) ​ ​ ( 509 ) Other (income) expense, net ​ ​ 394 ​ ​ ( 657 ) ​ ​ ( 1,125 ) ​ ​ ( 7,216 ) Net loss ​ $ ( 14,713 ) ​ $ ( 19,187 ) ​ $ ( 27,404 ) ​ $ ( 26,441 ) Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders ​ $ ( 0.49 ) ​ $ ( 2.45 ) ​ $ ( 1.02 ) ​ $ ( 4.17 ) Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted ​ 30,300 ​ 7,843 ​ 26,954 ​ 6,347 ​ The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. ​ 8 Table of Contents BIOXCEL THERAPEUTICS, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY (amounts in thousands) (unaudited) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Additional ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Common stock ​ paid-in- ​ Accumulated ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Shares ​ ​ ​ Amount ​ ​ ​ capital ​ ​ ​ deficit ​ ​ ​ Total Balance as of December 31, 2024 ​ 3,102 ​ $ 49 ​ $ 557,047 ​ $ ( 650,197 ) ​ $ ( 93,101 ) Issuance of common shares, net of offering costs ​ 2,358 ​ ​ 10 ​ ​ 471 ​ ​ — ​ ​ 481 Stock-based compensation ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ 180 ​ ​ — ​ ​ 180 Issuance of pre-funded stock purchase warrants ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ 9,523 ​ ​ — ​ ​ 9,523 Vesting of restricted stock units, net of employee tax obligations ​ 8 ​ ​ — ​ ​ ( 1 ) ​ ​ — ​ ​ ( 1 ) Net loss ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ ( 7,254 ) ​ ​ ( 7,254 ) Balance as of March 31, 2025 ​ 5,468 ​ $ 59 ​ $ 567,220 ​ $ ( 657,451 ) ​ $ ( 90,172 ) Issuance of common shares, net of offering costs ​ 1,146 ​ ​ 1 ​ ​ 135 ​ ​ — ​ ​ 136 Stock-based compensation ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ 1,556 ​ ​ — ​ ​ 1,556 Vesting of restricted stock units, net of employee tax obligations ​ 6 ​ ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ — Net loss ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ ( 19,187 ) ​ ​ ( 19,187 ) Balance as of June 30, 2025 ​ 6,620 ​ $ 60 ​ $ 568,911 ​ $ ( 676,638 ) ​ $ ( 107,667 ) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Additional ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Common stock ​ paid-in- ​ Accumulated ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Shares ​ ​ ​ Amount ​ ​ ​ capital ​ ​ ​ deficit ​ ​ ​ Total Balance as of December 31, 2025 ​ 22,328 ​ $ 76 ​ $ 624,555 ​ $ ( 720,094 ) ​ $ ( 95,463 ) Issuance of common shares, net of offering costs ​ 4,746 ​ ​ ( 49 ) ​ ​ 1,518 ​ ​ — ​ ​ 1,469 Stock-based compensation ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ 532 ​ ​ — ​ ​ 532 Issuance of pre-funded stock purchase warrants ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ 610 ​ ​ — ​ ​ 610 Vesting of restricted stock units, net of employee tax obligations ​ 1 ​ ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ — Net loss ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ ( 12,691 ) ​ ​ ( 12,691 ) Balance as of March 31, 2026 ​ 27,075 ​ $ 27 ​ $ 627,215 ​ $ ( 732,785 ) ​ $ ( 105,543 ) Issuance of common shares, net of offering costs ​ 4,047 ​ ​ 4 ​ ​ 4,458 ​ ​ — ​ ​ 4,462 Stock-based compensation ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ 358 ​ ​ — ​ ​ 358 Vesting of restricted stock units, net of employee tax obligations ​ 183 ​ ​ — ​ ​ ( 24 ) ​ ​ — ​ ​ ( 24 ) Net loss ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ ( 14,713 ) ​ ​ ( 14,713 ) Balance as of June 30, 2026 ​ 31,305 ​ $ 31 ​ $ 632,007 ​ $ ( 747,498 ) ​ $ ( 115,460 ) ​ The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. 9 Table of Contents BIOXCEL THERAPEUTICS, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (amounts in thousands) (unaudited) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Six months ended June 30, ​ ​ ​ ​ 2026 ​ ​ ​ 2025 OPERATING CASH FLOW ACTIVITIES: ​ ​ ​ ​ Net loss ​ $ ( 27,404 ) ​ $ ( 26,441 ) Reconciliation of net loss to net cash used in operating activities ​ ​ ​ ​ Depreciation ​ 76 ​ 151 Accretion of debt discount and amortization of financing costs ​ ​ 1,276 ​ ​ 743 Change in fair value of derivative liabilities ​ ​ ( 1,125 ) ​ ​ ( 7,222 ) Stock-based compensation expense ​ 793 ​ 1,736 Payable-in-kind interest on Credit Agreement ​ ​ 3,409 ​ ​ 5,433 Operating lease right-of-use assets ​ ​ 56 ​ ​ 160 Changes in operating assets and liabilities ​ ​ ​ ​ Accounts receivable ​ ​ 151 ​ 114 Inventory ​ 239 ​ 173 Prepaid expenses and other current assets ​ 639 ​ 673 Accounts payable, accrued expenses, due to related parties, and other current liabilities ​ 4,048 ​ 45 Operating lease liabilities ​ ​ ( 65 ) ​ ​ ( 183 ) Net cash used in operating activities ​ ​ ( 17,907 ) ​ ​ ( 24,618 ) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ INVESTING CASH FLOW ACTIVITIES: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Purchases of equipment and leasehold improvements ​ ​ — ​ ​ — Net cash from investing activities ​ ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ FINANCING CASH FLOW ACTIVITIES: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants ​ ​ 11,607 ​ ​ 14,146 Payment of principal of Long-term debt ​ ​ ( 8,412 ) ​ ​ — Offering costs for common stock and warrants issuance ​ ​ ( 220 ) ​ ​ ( 806 ) Payment of employee tax obligations related to vesting restricted stock units ​ ​ ( 24 ) ​ ​ ( 1 ) Net cash provided by financing activities ​ ​ 2,951 ​ ​ 13,339 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Net (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash ​ ​ ( 14,956 ) ​ ​ ( 11,279 ) Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of the period ​ 28,757 ​ 29,854 Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of the period ​ $ 13,801 ​ $ 18,575 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Balance sheet reconciliation: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Cash and cash equivalents ​ $ 12,841 ​ $ 17,435 Restricted cash ​ ​ 960 ​ ​ 1,140 Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash as presented above ​ $ 13,801 ​ $ 18,575 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Supplemental cash flow information: ​ ​ ​ ​ Issuance of stock purchase warrants ​ $ 7,587 ​ $ — Repricing of stock purchase warrants ​ $ 506 ​ $ — Interest paid ​ $ 3,651 ​ $ — ​ The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. ​ 10 Table of Contents BIOXCEL THERAPEUTICS, INC. NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts and where otherwise noted) (unaudited) Note 1. Nature of the Business BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. (“BTI” or the “Company”) is a biopharmaceutical company built on artificial intelligence (“AI”) approaches to develop transformative medicines in neuroscience and immuno-oncology. The Company is focused on utilizing cutting-edge technology and innovative research to develop high-value therapeutics aimed at transforming patients’ lives. BTI developed a proprietary AI platform to reduce therapeutic development costs and potentially accelerate development timelines. The Company’s approach leverages existing approved drugs and/or clinically evaluated product candidates together with big data and proprietary machine learning algorithms to identify new therapeutic indices. BTI management believes this differentiated approach has proven its potential to reduce the expense and time associated with drug development in diseases with substantial unmet medical needs. As used in these condensed consolidated financial statements, unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires, the terms “BioXcel LLC” refers to the Company’s former parent company, BioXcel LLC and, its predecessor, BioXcel Corporation. “OnkosXcel” refers to BTI’s wholly owned subsidiary for its advanced immuno-oncology assets, OnkosXcel Therapeutics, LLC. On April 6, 2022, BTI announced that the FDA approved IGALMI ® (dexmedetomidine or “Dex”) sublingual film for the acute treatment of agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar I or II disorder in adults. IGALMI ® is approved to be self-administrated by patients under the supervision of a health care provider. On July 6, 2022, BTI announced that IGALMI ® , was commercially available in doses of 120 and 180 micrograms. The Company’s most advanced neuroscience clinical development program is BXCL501. In indications other than those approved by the FDA as IGALMI ® , BXCL501 is an investigational proprietary, orally dissolving, film formulation of Dex for the treatment of agitation associated with psychiatric and neurological disorders. The Company’s advanced immuno-oncology asset, BXCL701, is an investigational, orally administered systemic innate immune activator for the treatment of a rare form of prostate cancer and advanced solid tumors that are refractory or treatment naïve to checkpoint inhibitors. BTI was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on March 29, 2017. The Company’s principal office is in New Haven, Connecticut. Note 2. Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all the information and notes required by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) in the U.S. The accompanying year-end balance sheet was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited annual financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair statement of the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2026, the results of its operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 and its cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025. The results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2026, any other interim periods or any future year or period. The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the 11 Table of Contents Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2026. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts for the Company and all entities where BTI has a controlling financial interest after elimination of all intercompany accounts and transactions and have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. As of June 30, 2026, the Company had cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of $ 13,801 and an accumulated deficit of $ 747,498 . The Company has incurred substantial net losses and negative cash flows from operating activities in nearly every fiscal period since inception and expects this trend to continue for the foreseeable future. The Company recognized net losses of $ 14,713 and $ 19,187 for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $ 27,404 and $ 26,441 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and had net cash used in operating activities of $ 17,907 and $ 24,618 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. Under ASC Topic 205-40, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern, management is required at each reporting period to evaluate whether there are conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. The Company’s history of significant losses, its negative cash flows from operations, its current debt obligations, potential near-term increased covenant-driven amortization payments under its Credit Agreement (as defined in Note 9, Debt and Credit Facilities ), its limited liquidity resources currently on hand, and its dependence on its ability to obtain additional financing to fund its operations after the current resources are exhausted, about which there can be no certainty, have resulted in management’s assessment that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least 12 months from the issuance date of the financial statements included in this Quarterly Report. This going concern evaluation takes into consideration the potential mitigating effect of management’s Clinical Reprioritization (as defined in Note 4, Restructuring ). When substantial doubt exists, management evaluates whether the mitigating effect of its plans sufficiently alleviates the substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The mitigating effect of management’s plans, however, is only considered if both (i) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued and (ii) it is probable that the plans, when implemented, will mitigate the relevant conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. Generally, to be considered probable of being effectively implemented, the plans need to be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. Although the Company has developed and implemented certain plans, they will not mitigate the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business and does not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The going concern analysis does not consider possible future amendments to or restructuring of the Credit Agreement (as defined in Note 9, Debt and Credit Facilities ) or other potential sources of debt or equity capital. Management and the Company’s board of directors, with the assistance of advisors, have been actively pursuing a sale, merger, or other strategic transaction and additional financing alternatives, but to date these efforts have not resulted in a signed definitive agreement or committed source of additional capital. To date, the Company has continued research and development activities while managing its cash position. However, the Company requires additional funding to continue as a going concern and has been unsuccessful to date in securing sufficient additional funding, notwithstanding an active process to identify and complete a sale, merger, financing or other strategic transaction. If the Company does not complete a strategic transaction, or does not receive sufficient financing from other sources of equity or debt financings, the Company expects it will likely file for protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Even if the Company is successful in raising additional capital, it will 12 Table of Contents require substantial additional financing to service its debt facilities and achieve its goals and a failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed could force the Company to delay, limit, reduce or terminate its product development or commercialization efforts. In connection with its efforts to pursue strategic alternatives, the Company has engaged restructuring and financial advisory professionals and, together with our Lenders, is engaged in contingency planning, including discussions regarding the potential availability of debtor-in-possession financing, in the event a strategic transaction acceptable to the Lenders is not completed on or prior to August 21, 2026, as required pursuant to the Twelfth Amendment to the Credit Agreement described below. The Company has not made any determination to commence a bankruptcy proceeding, and there can be no assurance as to which, if any, of these alternatives will be pursued or completed. Further, certain strategic alternatives will require the consent of our Lenders pursuant to the covenants in the Company’s Credit Agreement. Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. Estimates are used in the following areas, among others: revenue recognition, derivative liabilities, stock-based compensation expense, inventory, accrued expenses and income taxes. Although these estimates are based on the Company’s knowledge of current events and actions it may undertake in the future, actual results may ultimately materially differ from these estimates. Significant Accounting Policies There have been no material changes to the significant accounting policies previously disclosed in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Recently adopted accounting pronouncements In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets. The amendments provide a practical expedient and, if applicable, an accounting policy election to simplify the measurement of credit losses for certain receivables and contract assets. The amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2025, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Accounting pronouncements effective in future periods In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income statement-reporting comprehensive income-expense disaggregation disclosures, which requires public entities to disclose specified information about certain costs and expenses. ASU 2024-03 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect of adopting this guidance on its consolidated financial statements. ​ Note 4. Restructuring During both 2023 and 2024 the Company took multiple steps to reduce its headcount to curtail expenses and focus on its clinical development efforts, collectively referred to as its Clinical Reprioritization. As an on-going part of the Clinical Reprioritization, on April 8, 2025, the Board unanimously approved (i) the payment of a retention bonus to all non-executive employees in the total aggregate amount of $ 1,522 , to be paid in two equal installments and (ii) the issuance of 66 RSUs which fully vest on the one-year anniversary of the grant date. The 13 Table of Contents first installment of the retention bonus was paid on April 30, 2025 and the second installment was paid on September 30, 2025. Each such installment payment was subject to the applicable employee’s continued employment through December 31, 2025. On September 16, 2025, the Company dissolved its operations in the Czech Republic and paid $ 194 in closure related expenses during the third quarter of 2025. Note 5. Inventory Inventory consists of the following: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ June 30, ​ ​ ​ December 31, ​ ​ ​ ​ 2026 ​ ​ ​ 2025 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Raw materials ​ $ 408 ​ $ 317 Work-in-process ​ ​ — ​ ​ 368 Finished goods ​ ​ 75 ​ ​ 37 Total inventory ​ $ 483 ​ $ 722 ​ The Company recorded inventory write-downs totaling $ 0 and $ 265 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively. The Company recorded inventory write-downs of $ 95 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025. Note 6. Property and Equipment, Net Property and equipment, net consists of the following: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ June 30, ​ ​ ​ December 31, ​ ​ ​ ​ 2026 ​ ​ ​ 2025 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Computers and equipment ​ $ 202 ​ $ 202 Furniture ​ ​ 575 ​ ​ 575 Leasehold improvements ​ ​ 1,200 ​ ​ 1,200 Total property and equipment ​ $ 1,977 ​ $ 1,977 Accumulated depreciation ​ ​ ( 1,878 ) ​ ​ ( 1,802 ) Total property and equipment, net ​ $ 99 ​ $ 175 ​ Depreciation expense was $ 18 and $ 75 for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $ 76 and $ 151 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. ​ Note 7. Accrued Expenses Accrued expenses consist of the following: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ June 30, 2026 ​ ​ ​ December 31, 2025 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Accrued research and development expenses ​ $ 1,516 ​ $ 2,546 Accrued compensation and benefits ​ ​ 20 ​ ​ 34 Accrued professional fees ​ 1,783 ​ 1,107 Accrued taxes ​ ​ 40 ​ ​ 32 Other accrued expenses ​ ​ 562 ​ ​ 622 Total accrued expenses ​ $ 3,921 ​ $ 4,341 ​ ​ ​ 14 Table of Contents Note 8. Transactions with BioXcel LLC The Company entered into a Separation and Shared Services Agreement with BioXcel LLC that took effect on June 30, 2017, as amended and restated thereafter (the “Services Agreement”), pursuant to which BioXcel LLC has agreed to provide the Company with certain intellectual property prosecution and management and research and development activities. Under the Services Agreement, the Company had an option to enter into a separate collaborative services agreement with BioXcel LLC pursuant to which BioXcel LLC shall perform product identification and related services for us utilizing its EvolverAI. The Company agreed to pay BioXcel LLC $ 18 per month from March 13, 2023 to December 31, 2024 in exchange for this option. This option expired without being exercised. However, BioXcel LLC continues to perform certain administrative services under the terms of the original contract. We agreed to negotiate any such collaborative services agreement in good faith and to incorporate reasonable market-based terms, including consideration for BioXcel LLC reflecting a low, single-digit royalty on net sales and reasonable development and commercialization milestone payments, provided that (i) development milestone payments shall not exceed $ 10,000 in the aggregate and not be payable prior to proof of concept in humans and (ii) commercialization milestone payments shall be based on reaching annual net sales levels, be limited to 3 % of the applicable net sales level, and not exceed $ 30,000 in the aggregate. The Company did not exercise its option to renew the agreement for product identification and related services utilizing BioXcel LLC’s EvolverAI. Subsequent to December 31, 2024 no development activity has been carried out by BioXcel LLC and none is contemplated. Service charges recorded under the Services Agreement for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively were as follows: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Three months ended June 30, ​ Six months ended June 30, ​ ​ 2026 ​ 2025 ​ 2026 ​ 2025 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Research and development ​ ​ ​ $ 105 ​ $ 115 ​ $ 210 ​ $ 264 Selling, general and administrative ​ 5 ​ ​ 17 ​ 5 ​ ​ 85 Total ​ $ 110 ​ $ 132 ​ $ 215 ​ $ 349 ​ As of June 30, 2026, there were no outstanding service charges related to the Services Agreement included in Due to related parties in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Note 9. Debt and Credit Facilities Debt, net of unamortized discounts and financing costs, consists of the following: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ June 30, 2026 ​ ​ ​ December 31, 2025 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Credit Agreement and Guaranty ​ $ 93,906 ​ $ 102,319 Payable-in-kind ("PIK") interest ​ ​ 13,246 ​ ​ 9,837 Total debt liability ​ $ 107,152 ​ $ 112,156 Unamortized debt premiums, discounts and issuance costs ​ ​ ( 2,701 ) ​ ​ ( 2,562 ) Total debt ​ $ 104,451 ​ $ 109,594 Less current portion of debt ​ ​ ( 104,451 ) ​ ​ ( 24,931 ) Long-term debt ​ $ — ​ $ 84,663 ​ The Company maintains a senior secured credit facility (the “Credit Agreement”), as amended, with lenders (the “Lenders”) managed by Oaktree Fund Administration LLC (“OFA”), as administrative agent. The Lenders are 15 Table of Contents comprised of affiliates of Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. The facility provides for term loans that are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and its guarantor subsidiaries, subject to customary exceptions. As of June 30, 2026, borrowings under the Credit Agreement consisted of funded term loans, inclusive of previously capitalized interest and net of required principal repayments made to date. The loans are not revolving and no additional tranches remain available, as all undrawn commitments have expired. The term loans bear interest at a fixed annual rate of 13.0 %. Interest is payable quarterly in cash. The Company previously had the ability to elect payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest through June 30, 2025, which resulted in additional amounts being capitalized as principal. Pursuant to the Tenth Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the “Tenth Amendment”), the Company subsequently regained the ability to elect PIK interest only for the second quarter of 2026 and elected such treatment for interest accrued from April 1, 2026 through June 30, 2026, with the related interest amounts capitalized to principal. The blended effective interest rate as of June 30, 2026 was approximately 16.6 %. In addition to interest, the Credit Agreement includes customary fees, including prepayment premiums and amendment-related fees. There are no remaining commitment fees as all undrawn commitments have expired. An exit fee of 0.50 % of the principal amount repaid is payable upon maturity or prepayment of the loans. The loans under the Credit Agreement do not amortize and mature on April 19, 2027. The Company may, at its option, no earlier than September 21, 2026 and no later than October 21, 2026, request an extension of the maturity date to April 19, 2028, provided that the Company satisfies certain conditions including receipt of certain regulatory and financial milestones. The Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by BTI’s existing and subsequently acquired or organized subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions. BTI’s obligations under the Credit Agreement and the related guarantees thereunder are secured, subject to customary permitted liens and other agreed upon exceptions, by (i) a pledge of all of the equity interests of all of the Company’s existing and any future direct subsidiaries, and (ii) a perfected security interest in all of its and the guarantors’ tangible and intangible assets (except that the guarantees provided by the BXCL701 Subsidiaries are unsecured). The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including restrictions on additional indebtedness, liens, investments, asset sales, and distributions, and requires the Company to maintain a specified minimum level of cash and cash equivalents under a minimum liquidity covenant. As of June 30, 2026, the Company had satisfied the minimum liquidity requirement of $ 12,500 . The Credit Agreement includes customary events of default, including payment defaults, covenant breaches, cross-defaults, bankruptcy-related events, and certain regulatory-related events. Upon an event of default, the lenders may accelerate the obligations and exercise remedies against the collateral. Warrants In connection with prior period amendments to the Credit Agreement, the Company issued and modified several warrants as part of its financing arrangements. The “Closing Date Warrants”, originally issued in April 2022, were amended and restated in December 2023 to reduce the exercise price, and the Company concurrently issued additional “2023 Warrants”, with both sets of warrants exercisable at the same price, expiring on April 19, 2029, and subject to net exercise provisions. At the subsidiary level, “OnkosXcel Warrants” were issued to purchase limited liability company units, with a formula-based exercise price contingent on future equity financings or liquidity events and similarly expiring in 2029. Subsequently, in connection with a later amendment, the Company issued “2024 Warrants” with an exercise price based on a premium to recent market prices, which also expire on April 19, 2029 and may be net exercised. 2026 Credit Agreement Amendment On March 27, 2026, the Company entered into the Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement, and by and among the Company, as the borrower, the Lenders and OFA as administrative agent, which included among other things, (i) a 16 Table of Contents waiver of the “going concern” qualification for our audited annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025 and (ii) a reduction in the Credit Agreement’s minimum liquidity covenant of $ 2,500 (from $ 15,000 to $ 12,500 ). In connection with the Ninth Amendment the Company (i) made a one-time prepayment of the principal amount of $ 2,500 , together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon on March 31, 2026, (ii) granted warrants to the Lenders to purchase up to 1,354 shares of common stock of the Company, at an exercise price of $ 0.01 per share (the “April 2026 Warrants”) and (iii) following receipt of aggregated gross proceeds following the effective date of the Ninth Amendment from (a) the issuance of the Company’s common stock, warrants and/or pre-funded warrants, (b) non-refundable cash consideration from partnering transactions, (c) the issuance of the Company’s subordinated debt and/or (d) sales by the Company of its assets, in each case ((a) through (d)), in transactions permitted under the Credit Agreement (“Capital Raise Activities”), make a prepayment of the loans under the Credit Agreement in an aggregate principal amount equal to 50 % of such gross cash proceeds, together with accrued interest thereon and any fees or premia (including prepayment premium) payable in connection therewith; provided, that the foregoing requirement will not apply (A) with respect to the first $ 2,500 in the aggregate of proceeds raised from Capital Raise Activities (as defined in the Credit Agreement) and (B) once the aggregate principal amount of the Loans prepaid pursuant to one or more Capital Raise Prepayments equals $ 2,500 . On April 30, 2026 and May 2, 2026, the Company issued 671 and 671 shares of its common stock, respectively, in connection with the cashless exercise of the 1,354 warrants. As of June 30, 2026, the Company was in compliance with all financial and restrictive covenants under the Credit Agreement. Maturities of debt are expected to be as follows: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ June 30, 2026 ​ ​ ​ ​ 2026 ​ $ 20,233 2027 ​ $ 86,919 Thereafter ​ $ — ​ Interest expense was as follows: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Three months ended ​ Six months ended ​ June 30, ​ June 30, ​ 2026 ​ 2025 ​ 2026 ​ 2025 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Interest expense $ 3,483 ​ $ 3,829 ​ $ 7,179 ​ $ 7,472 Accretion of debt discount and amortization of financing costs ​ 774 ​ ​ 393 ​ 1,276 ​ ​ 743 Total interest expense $ 4,257 ​ $ 4,222 ​ $ 8,455 ​ $ 8,215 ​ ​ Note 10. Derivative Financial Instruments BTI identified certain freestanding financial instruments and/or embedded features that require separate accounting from the borrowings under the OFA Facilities. This includes the OnkosXcel Warrants held by the Lenders. The OnkosXcel Warrants do not meet certain scope exceptions under U.S. GAAP, primarily because the exercise price and number of shares of the Company’s common stock issuable under the instrument is variable, and the instrument meets the definition of a derivative instrument. Therefore, this instrument is recorded as Derivative liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Derivative liability was recorded at fair value on the date of issuance and is revalued on each balance sheet date until the instrument is settled or expire, with changes in the fair value between reporting periods recorded within Other (income) expense, net in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. ​ On March 25, 2024, with respect to the Purchase Agreement discussed in Note 11, Common Stock Financing Activities , BTI determined that the Accompanying Warrants fail the equity classification criteria and are therefore 17 Table of Contents classified as liabilities in accordance with ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity ("ASC 480") and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). The Accompanying Warrants failed to meet the requirements to be indexed to equity and equity classified, and meet the definition of a derivative instrument. Therefore, these instruments are recorded as Derivative liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2026. The respective derivative liabilities were recorded at fair value on the date of issuance and are revalued on each balance sheet date until such instruments are settled or expire, with changes in the fair value between reporting periods recorded within Other (income) expense, net in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. We value the Accompanying Warrants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model as discussed in Note 14, Fair value measurements . ​ On November 21, 2024, the exercise price of 534 of the total 539 Accompanying Warrants was reduced from $ 51.20 to $ 9.136 per share. On March 10, 2026, in connection with the March 2026 Offering discussed in Note 11, Common Stock Financing Activities , the exercise price of 534 of the Accompanying Warrants was further reduced from $ 9.136 to $ 1.614 per share, the exercise price of the remaining 5 Accompanying Warrants was reduced from $ 51.20 to $ 1.614 per share and the term of all 539 Accompanying Warrants was extended to five years following the closing date of the March 2026 Offering. As a result of the repricing, the Company recorded the increase in fair value of $ 224 as an increase to the carrying value of Derivative liabilities, and as a reduction to Additional paid-in-capital in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company recorded a net loss of $ 34 and a net gain of $ 96 , respectively, in Other (income) expense, net, in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of June 30, 2026, the fair value of the Accompanying Warrants was $ 630 . ​ On November 25, 2024, with respect to the Underwriter Agreement discussed in Note 11, Common Stock Financing Activities , the Company issued additional warrants (the “November 2024 Accompanying Warrants”). The November 2024 Accompanying Warrants failed to meet the requirements to be indexed to equity and equity classified, and meet the definition of a derivative instrument. Therefore, these instruments are recorded as Derivative liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2026. The respective derivative liabilities were recorded at fair value on the date of issuance and are revalued on each balance sheet date until such instruments are settled or expire, with changes in the fair value between reporting periods recorded within Other (income) expense, net in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. ​ On March 10, 2026, in connection with the March 2026 Offering discussed in Note 11, Common Stock Financing Activities , the exercise price of 846 of the total 913 November 2024 Accompanying Warrants was reduced from $ 7.68 to $ 1.614 per share and the term was extended to five years following the closing date of the March 2026 Offering. As a result of the repricing, the Company recorded the increase in fair value of $ 282 as an increase to the carrying value of Derivative liabilities, and as a reduction to Additional paid-in-capital in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company recorded a net loss of $ 56 and a net gain of $ 170 , respectively, in Other (income) expense, net, in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of June 30, 2026, the fair value of the November 2024 Accompanying Warrants was $ 1,046 . ​ On March 3, 2025, with respect to the March 2025 Offering discussed in Note 11, Common Stock Financing Activities , the Company issued additional warrants (the “March 2025 Accompanying Warrants”). The March 2025 Accompanying Warrants failed to meet the requirements to be indexed to equity and equity classified, and meet the definition of a derivative instrument. Therefore, these instruments are recorded as Derivative liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2026. The respective derivative liabilities were recorded at fair value on the date of issuance and are revalued on each balance sheet date until such instruments are settled or expire, with changes in the fair value between reporting periods recorded within Other (income) expense, net in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. In August 2025, 2,300 of the March 2025 Accompanying Warrants were exercised. In connection with the exercise, the Company remeasured the fair value of the warrant liability, resulting in a recognized net loss of $ 9,920 recorded in Other (income) expense, net in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of June 30, 2026, the fair value of the remaining 1,700 March 2025 Accompanying Warrants was $ 167 . For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company recorded a net loss of $ 16 and a net gain of $ 187 , for the remaining warrants in Other (income) expense, net, in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. ​ 18 Table of Contents In connection with the March 2025 Offering discussed in Note 11, Common Stock Financing Activities , the Company also issued option warrants (the “Option Warrants”). The Option Warrants failed to meet the requirements to be indexed to equity and equity classified, and meet the definition of a derivative instrument. Therefore, these instruments are initially recorded as Derivative liabilities. The respective derivative liabilities were recorded at fair value on the date of issuance in the amount of $ 369 . The Option Warrants expired on March 18, 2025 without being exercised, and the Company recorded a termination gain of $ 369 in Other (income) expense, net, in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of June 30, 2026, the fair value of the Option Warrants was $ 0 . ​ On March 10, 2026, with respect to the March 2026 Offering discussed in Note 11, Common Stock Financing Activities , the Company issued additional warrants (the “March 2026 Accompanying Warrants”). The March 2026 Accompanying Warrants failed to meet the requirements to be indexed to equity and equity classified, and met the definition of a derivative instrument. Therefore, these instruments are recorded as Derivative liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2026. The respective derivative liabilities were recorded at fair value on the date of issuance in the amount of $ 5,940 and are revalued on each balance sheet date until such instruments are settled or expire, with changes in the fair value between reporting periods recorded within Other (income) expense, net in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of June 30, 2026, the fair value of the March 2026 Accompanying Warrants was $ 5,267 . For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company recorded a net loss of $ 287 , and a net gain of $ 673 , respectively, in Other (income) expense, net, in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. ​ Note 11. Common Stock Financing Activities March 2024 Offering ​ On March 25, 2024, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with the purchasers named therein (collectively, the “Purchasers”). Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to issue and sell to the Purchasers in a registered direct offering (the “Offering”) under an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-275261) and a related prospectus supplement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2024 (the “Prospectus Supplement”) an aggregate of 191 shares (the “Shares”) of Common Stock, and accompanying warrants (the “Accompanying Warrants”) to purchase up to 191 shares of common stock at a combined offering price of $ 46.416 per Share and Accompanying Warrant and pre-funded warrants (the “Pre-Funded Warrants”) to purchase up to 348 shares of common stock and Accompanying Warrants to purchase up to 348 shares of common stock, at a combined offering price of $ 46.40 per share underlying each Pre-Funded Warrant and Accompanying Warrant, which equals the offering price per Share and Accompanying Warrant less the $ 0.016 exercise price per share of the Pre-Funded Warrants. The Pre-Funded Warrants and Accompanying Warrants are not listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market or any other securities exchange or trading system and the Company does not intend to list them. On March 27, 2024, the Company received $ 25,000 of gross proceeds from the Offering, incurred costs of $ 248 , and received net proceeds of $ 24,752 . ​ The Pre-Funded Warrants have an exercise price per share of common stock equal to $ 0.016 per share. The exercise price and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Pre-Funded Warrants are subject to appropriate adjustments in the event of certain stock dividends and distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar events affecting the common stock. The Pre-Funded Warrants are exercisable at any time after the date of issuance. The Pre-Funded Warrants meet the equity classification criteria and are therefore classified as equity. For the year ended December 31, 2024, all 348 Pre-Funded Warrants were exercised and the same number of shares of common stock were issued. ​ The Accompanying Warrants have an exercise price per share of common stock equal to $ 51.20 per share. The exercise price and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Accompanying Warrants are subject to appropriate adjustments in the event of certain stock dividends and distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar events affecting the common stock. The Accompanying Warrants will be exercisable at any time after the date of issuance and will expire on the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance. The Accompanying Warrants do not meet certain scope exceptions under U.S. GAAP, primarily because they did not meet the requirements to be indexed to equity and equity classified, and the instruments meet the definition of a derivative 19 Table of Contents instrument. Therefore, these instruments are recorded as Derivative liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2026. There were no warrant exercises during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026. ​ November 2024 Offering ​ On November 22, 2024, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with Canaccord Genuity LLC, as underwriter (the “Underwriter”), in connection with the issuance and sale by the Company in a public offering of (i) 350 shares of the Company’s common stock, and accompanying warrants (the “November 2024 Accompanying Warrants”) to purchase 350 shares of Common Stock, at a combined public offering price of $ 7.68 per share, and, in lieu thereof to certain investors, (ii) Pre-Funded Warrants to purchase 563 shares of Common Stock, and accompanying warrants to purchase 563 shares of Common Stock, at a combined public offering price of $ 7.664 per pre-funded warrant, which equals the public offering price per share of Common Stock and accompanying warrant less the $ 0.016 exercise price per share of the pre-funded warrants, less underwriting discounts and commissions, pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-275261) and a related prospectus supplement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company received net proceeds from the offering of approximately $ 6,128 , after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses of $ 871 . The Company used the net proceeds of the offering to fund the SERENITY At-Home trial, prepare for the initiation of the TRANQUILITY In-Care trial, working capital and general corporate purposes. The Pre-Funded Warrants have an exercise price per share of common stock equal to $ 0.016 per share. The exercise price and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Pre-Funded Warrants are subject to appropriate adjustments in the event of certain stock dividends and distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar events affecting the common stock. The Pre-Funded Warrants are exercisable at any time after the date of issuance. The Pre-Funded Warrants meet the equity classification criteria and are therefore classified as equity. For the year ended December 31, 2024, 80 Pre-Funded Warrants were exercised and the same number of shares of common stock were issued. The remaining 483 Pre-Funded Warrants were exercised and the same number of common stock were issued during the three months ended March 31, 2025 in exchange for $ 8 of proceeds received. ​ The November 2024 Accompanying Warrants originally had an exercise price per share of common stock equal to $ 7.68 per share. The exercise price and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the November 2024 Accompanying Warrants are subject to appropriate adjustments in the event of certain stock dividends and distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar events affecting the common stock. The November 2024 Accompanying Warrants are exercisable at any time after the date of issuance and will expire on the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance. The November 2024 Accompanying Warrants do not meet certain scope exceptions under U.S. GAAP, primarily because they did not meet the requirements to be indexed to equity and equity classified, and the instruments meet the definition of a derivative instrument. Therefore, these instruments are recorded as Derivative liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2026. There were no warrant exercises during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026. ​ March 2025 Offering On March 3, 2025, the Company entered into a purchase agreement (the “March 2025 Offering”) with a purchaser. Pursuant to the March 2025 Offering, the Company agreed to issue and sell to the purchaser and the purchaser agreed to buy in a registered direct offering (i) an aggregate of 188 shares (the “Shares”) of Common Stock at an offering price of $ 3.50 per share, (ii) Pre-Funded Warrants to purchase up to 3,812 shares of Common Stock, at an offering price of $ 3.499 per share underlying the Pre-Funded Warrants, which equals the offering price per share less the $ 0.001 exercise price per share of the Pre-Funded Warrants, and (iii) an aggregate of 4,000 accompanying warrants (the “March 2025 Accompanying Warrants”) to purchase up to 4,000 shares of Common Stock at an offering price of $ 4.20 per accompanying warrant, pursuant to an effective registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-275261), including the base prospectus included therein, and prospectus supplement filed with the SEC on March 4, 2025. The Company received net proceeds from the offering of approximately $ 12,957 , after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses of $ 1,039 . ​ 20 Table of Contents The Pre-Funded Warrants have an exercise price per share of common stock equal to $ 0.001 per share. The exercise price and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Pre-Funded Warrants are subject to appropriate adjustments in the event of certain stock dividends and distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar events affecting the common stock. The Pre-Funded Warrants are exercisable at any time after the date of issuance. The Pre-Funded Warrants meet the equity classification criteria and are therefore classified as equity. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, 1,688 Pre-Funded Warrants were exercised and the same number of common stock were issued in exchange for $ 2 of proceeds received. The remaining 2,124 Pre-Funded Warrants were exercised and the same number of common stock were issued during the second and third quarter of 2025. The March 2025 Accompanying Warrants have an exercise price per share of common stock equal to $ 4.20 per share. The exercise price and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the March 2025 Accompanying Warrants are subject to appropriate adjustments in the event of certain stock dividends and distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar events affecting the common stock. The March 2025 Accompanying Warrants will be exercisable at any time after the date of issuance and will expire on the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance. The March 2025 Accompanying Warrants do not meet certain scope exceptions under U.S. GAAP, primarily because they did not meet the requirements to be indexed to equity and equity classified, and the instruments meet the definition of a derivative instrument. Therefore, these instruments are recorded as Derivative liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2026. During the third quarter of 2025, 2,300 March 2025 Accompanying Warrants were exercised and the same number of common stock were issued in exchange for $ 9,660 of proceeds received. There were no warrant exercises during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026. ​ In the March 2025 Offering, the Company also issued to the purchaser option warrants, to purchase up to 4,000 shares of Common Stock (or pre-funded warrants in lieu thereof) and accompanying warrants to purchase up to 4,000 shares of Common Stock. The exercise price of the Option Warrant is $ 3.50 per underlying share of Common Stock or $ 3.499 per underlying pre-funded warrant to purchase one share of Common Stock and accompanying warrant. The option accompanying warrants have an exercise price per share of common stock equal to $ 4.20 per share. The Option Warrants expired on March 18, 2025 without being exercised. ​ Canaccord At-the-Market Program ​ On April 3, 2025, the Company entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement (the “Equity Distribution Agreement”) with Canaccord Genuity LLC (“Canaccord”) to sell shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $ 0.001 per share, with aggregate gross sales proceeds of up to $ 8,135 , from time to time, through an “at the market” equity offering program under which Canaccord will act as sales agent. ​ On August 6, 2025, the Company increased the maximum amount of shares that are eligible to be sold pursuant to the Equity Distribution Agreement to allow for the offer and sale of up to $ 3,500 of its common stock. Following the sale of common stock, the Company raised sufficient net proceeds to satisfy the Raise 3 requirement under a prior amendment to the Credit Agreement. ​ On August 18, 2025, the Company filed a prospectus supplement with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the offer and sale of up to $ 80,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the Equity Distribution Agreement. For the three months ended June 30, 2026, the Company sold 2,706 shares for gross proceeds of $ 3,109 and received proceeds of $ 3,047 , net of issuance costs of $ 62 . For the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company sold 2,951 shares for gross proceeds of $ 3,607 and received proceeds of $ 3,535 , net of issuance costs of $ 72 . ​ 21 Table of Contents March 2026 Offering ​ On March 10, 2026, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “March 2026 Offering”) with a purchaser. Pursuant to the March 2026 Offering, the Company agreed to issue and sell to the purchaser and the purchaser agreed to buy in a registered direct offering (i) an aggregate of 2,480 shares (the “Shares”) of Common Stock, at an offering price of $ 1.739 per share, (ii) Pre-Funded warrants to purchase up to 2,020 shares of Common Stock, at an offering price of $ 1.738 per share underlying the Pre-Funded Warrants, which equals the offering price per Share and accompanying warrant less the $ 0.001 exercise price per share of the Pre-Funded Warrants, and (iii) an aggregate of 4,500 accompanying warrants (the “March 2026 Accompanying Warrants”) to purchase up to 4,500 shares of Common Stock at an offering price of $ 1.614 per accompanying warrant. pursuant to an effective registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-275261), including the base prospectus included therein, and a prospectus supplement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2026. The March 2026 Offering closed on March 11, 2026. The Company received net proceeds from the offering of approximately $ 6,879 , after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses of $ 946 . ​ The Pre-Funded Warrants have an exercise price per share of common stock equal to $ 0.001 per share. The exercise price and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Pre-Funded Warrants are subject to appropriate adjustments in the event of certain stock dividends and distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar events affecting the common stock. The Pre-Funded Warrants are exercisable at any time after the date of issuance. The Pre-Funded Warrants meet the equity classification criteria and are therefore classified as equity. During the three months ended March 31, 2026, all 2,020 Pre-Funded Warrants were exercised and the same number of common stock were issued in exchange for $ 2 of proceeds received. The March 2026 Accompanying Warrants have an exercise price per share of common stock equal to $ 1.614 per share. The exercise price and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the March 2026 Accompanying Warrants are subject to appropriate adjustments in the event of certain stock dividends and distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar events affecting the common stock. The March 2026 Accompanying Warrants will be exercisable at any time after the date of issuance and will expire on the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance. The March 2026 Accompanying Warrants do not meet certain scope exceptions under U.S. GAAP, primarily because they did not meet the requirements to be indexed to equity and equity classified, and the instruments meet the definition of a derivative instrument. Therefore, these instruments are recorded as Derivative liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2026. There were no warrant exercises during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026. ​ Rodman & Renshaw LLC (the “Placement Agent”) acted as the Company’s exclusive placement agent in connection with the March 2026 Offering. As compensation in connection with the March 2026 Offering, the Company agreed to (i) pay the Placement Agent a cash fee equal to 6.0 % of the gross proceeds from the March 2026 Offering, (ii) reimburse certain expenses of $ 75 , (iii) pay $ 16 for clearing and closing expenses, and (iv) issue to the Placement Agent or its designees warrants to purchase a number of shares of Common Stock equal to 4.0 % of the aggregate number of shares placed in the Registered Direct Offering ( 180,031 shares), at an exercise price equal to 125 % of the offering price per share (or $ 2.0175 per share), with a term of five years from the commencement of the Registered Direct Offering (the “March 2026 Placement Agent Warrants”). The exercise price and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the March 2026 Placement Agent Warrants are subject to appropriate adjustments in the event of certain stock dividends and distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar events affecting the common stock. The March 2026 Placement Agent Warrants will be exercisable at any time after the date of issuance and will expire on the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance. The March 2026 Placement Agent Warrants met certain scope exceptions under ASC 718 for equity classification. Therefore, these instruments are recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity in Additional-paid-in-capital in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2026. There were no warrant exercises during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026. ​ In connection with the March 2026 Offering, pursuant to the terms of a Warrant Amendment Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2026 (the “Warrant Amendment Agreement”), the exercise price of all 539 Accompanying Warrants and 846 of the November 2024 Accompanying Warrants was reduced to $ 1.614 per share and the term was extended to five 22 Table of Contents years following the closing date of the March 2026 Offering. The investor paid $ 173 in exchange for the reduction in exercise price and the extension of the term of these warrants. The Company paid the Placement Agent a cash fee of 6.0 % of the gross proceeds paid for the warrant amendment. ​ Note 12. Stock-Based Compensation 2017 Equity Incentive Plan The Company’s 2017 Plan became effective in August 2017. Following the effective date of the Company's 2020 Plan, the Company ceased granting awards under the 2017 Plan, however, the terms and conditions of the 2017 Plan continue to govern any outstanding awards granted thereunder. 2020 Incentive Award Plan The Company’s 2020 Plan was approved and became effective at the Company’s 2020 annual meeting of stockholders on May 20, 2020, and unless earlier terminated by the Board of Directors, will remain in effect until March 26, 2030. The 2020 Plan originally authorized for issuance the sum of (i) 57 shares of the Company’s common stock and (ii) 15 shares of the Company’s common stock, which represents the number of shares that remained available for issuance under the 2017 Plan immediately prior to the approval of the 2020 Plan by the Company’s stockholders. Any shares of common stock which, immediately prior to the approval of the 2020 Plan by the Company’s stockholders, were subject to awards granted under the 2017 Plan that are forfeited or lapse unexercised and are not issued under the 2017 Plan will increase the number of shares of common stock available for grant under the 2020 Plan. In addition, the number of shares available for issuance under the 2020 Plan will increase on the first day of each calendar year, beginning January 1, 2021 and ending on and including January 1, 2030, by a number of shares equal to the lesser of (A) 4 % of the aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding on the final day of the immediately preceding calendar year and (B) such smaller number of shares of common stock as determined by the Board of Directors. The shares available for issuance under the 2020 Plan increased by 893 shares and 124 shares on January 1, 2026 and 2025, respectively. Stock options granted under the 2020 Plan have a term of ten years . The vesting schedule of all awards granted under the 2020 Plan is determined by the Board of Directors, which is generally four years . As of June 30, 2026, there were 435 shares available to be granted under the 2020 Plan. BTI Restricted stock units The table below summarizes activity relating to BTI RSUs. ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Number of ​ ​ shares ​ ​ ​ Outstanding as of January 1, 2026 107 Granted ​ 409 Cancelled ​ ( 3 ) Vested ​ ( 205 ) Outstanding as of June 30, 2026 ​ 308 ​ During the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company granted 409 time-based BTI RSUs. These BTI RSUs vest quarterly over two years , with vesting beginning on November 4, 2025. The weighted average grant date fair value per share for the BTI RSUs for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $ 1.86 . The outstanding BTI RSUs issued prior to 2026 generally vest over four years , with 25 % vesting at the one-year anniversary of the grant date and the balance vesting ratably over the remaining 12 quarters of the vesting period. The total fair value of BTI RSUs vested in the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $ 254 . Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to the BTI RSUs was approximately $ 380 and $ 445 as of June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. 23 Table of Contents OnkosXcel profit sharing units The table below summarizes activity relating to the PSUs associated with OnkosXcel as described below. ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Weighted average ​ ​ Number of ​ price per unit ​ ​ units ​ (in whole dollars) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Outstanding as of January 1, 2026 1,072 ​ $ 5,663 Granted ​ — ​ $ — Cancelled ​ — ​ $ — Forfeited ​ — ​ $ — Outstanding as of June 30, 2026 ​ 1,072 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Vested units as of June 30, 2026 ​ 1,061 ​ $ 5,611 ​ During 2024, OnkosXcel Employee Holdings, LLC, a management holding company used to facilitate the grant of equity interests to service providers of OnkosXcel granted 15 individual (not in thousands) time-based PSUs related to OnkosXcel to certain employees of the Company in consideration for services provided to OnkosXcel. The PSUs represent indirect equity interests in OnkosXcel. These PSUs vest ratably over 48 months . The fair values of PSUs granted in 2024 were estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model and assumptions below. ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 2024 grant profit share unit valuation inputs ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Expected volatility ​ 97.4 % ​ Risk-free rate of interest ​ 3.6 % ​ Expected dividend yield ​ — % ​ Expected term ​ 5.8 years ​ ​ Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to these awards was $ 44 and $ 40 as of June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. OnkosXcel restricted stock units The table below summarizes activity relating to the OnkosXcel RSUs. ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Number of ​ ​ units ​ ​ ​ Outstanding as of January 1, 2026 135 Granted ​ — Vested ​ ( 4 ) Cancelled ​ — Outstanding as of June 30, 2026 ​ 131 ​ ​ ​ ​ 24 Table of Contents As of June 30, 2026, the Company had 131 OnkosXcel Restricted Stock Units outstanding. Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to the awards expected to vest was approximately $ 9 and $ 40 as of June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. BTI Stock options A summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2026 is presented below. ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Number of ​ Weighted average ​ ​ ​ shares ​ price per share ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Outstanding as of January 1, 2026 352 ​ $ 202.81 ​ Granted ​ 119 ​ $ 2.01 ​ Forfeited ​ ( 1 ) ​ $ 143.42 ​ Cancelled ​ ( 3 ) ​ $ 387.85 ​ Exercised ​ — ​ $ — ​ Outstanding as of June 30, 2026 ​ 467 ​ $ 150.78 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Options vested and exercisable as of June 30, 2026 332 ​ $ 206.82 ​ ​ As of June 30, 2026, the intrinsic value of options outstanding was $ 0 . The intrinsic value for stock options is calculated based on the difference between the exercise prices of the underlying awards and the quoted stock price of the Company’s common stock as of the reporting date. No stock options were exercised for the six months ended June 30, 2026. As of June 30, 2026, the total intrinsic value of stock options exercisable was $ 0 . The weighted average grant date fair value per share of options granted as of June 30, 2026 was $ 1.73 . The weighted average grant date fair value per share of options vested as of June 30, 2026 was $ 152.85 . The weighted average remaining contractual life is 4.9 years for options exercisable as of June 30, 2026. The weighted average remaining contractual life was 6.2 years for options outstanding as of June 30, 2026. Unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock option awards as of June 30, 2026 was $ 232 and will be recognized over the remaining vesting periods of the underlying awards. The weighted-average period over which such compensation is expected to be recognized is 0.5 years. Stock-Based Compensation The fair value of stock options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 was estimated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Six months ended ​ Six months ended ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ June 30, 2026 ​ June 30, 2025 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Expected term ​ ​ ​ ​ 5.5 years ​ ​ ​ ​ 5.3 years ​ Expected stock price volatility ​ ​ ​ ​ 122.0 % ​ ​ ​ ​ 112.0 % ​ Risk-free rate of interest ​ ​ ​ ​ 3.8 % ​ ​ ​ ​ 4.5 % ​ Expected dividend yield ​ ​ ​ ​ 0.0 % ​ ​ ​ ​ 0.0 % ​ ​ In 2026, the Company continued using the historical volatility of its common stock to estimate volatility. Prior to 2023, volatility was estimated using a combination of the historical volatility of publicly traded peer companies and that of the Company’s common stock. The expected term of the awards is estimated based on the simplified method, which calculates the expected term based upon the midpoint of the life of the award and the vesting period. The Company uses 25 Table of Contents the simplified method because it does not have sufficient option exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected term. The expected dividend yield is zero percent as the Company has no history of paying dividends nor does management expect to pay dividends over the contractual terms of these options. The risk-free interest rates are determined by reference to the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant, with maturities approximating the expected term of the stock options. The fair value of the underlying common stock is generally determined as the closing price of the Company’s common stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market on the grant date, with consideration of whether there is material nonpublic information that could impact that estimated fair value when it is released. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense related to awards issued under the 2017 Plan and the 2020 Plan, as well as the OnkosXcel RSUs and PSUs, of $ 358 and $ 1,556 for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $ 793 and $ 1,736 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, which were comprised as follows: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Three months ended June 30, ​ Six months ended June 30, ​ ​ 2026 ​ 2025 ​ 2026 ​ 2025 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Research and development ​ ​ ​ $ 51 ​ $ 648 ​ $ 130 ​ $ 134 Selling, general and administrative ​ 307 ​ ​ 908 ​ 663 ​ ​ 1,602 Total ​ $ 358 ​ $ 1,556 ​ $ 793 ​ $ 1,736 ​ 2020 Employee Stock Purchase Plan The Company’s 2020 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) was also approved and became effective at the Company’s 2020 annual meeting of stockholders on May 20, 2020. The ESPP is designed to assist eligible employees of the Company with the opportunity to purchase the Company’s common stock at a discount through accumulated payroll deductions during successive offering periods. The aggregate number of shares that were initially available to be issued pursuant to rights granted under the ESPP was 6 shares of common stock. In addition, the number of shares available for issuance under the ESPP increases on the first day of each calendar year, beginning on January 1, 2021 and ending on and including January 1, 2030, by a number of shares of common stock equal to the lesser of (a) 1 % of the shares outstanding on the final day of the immediately preceding calendar year and (b) such smaller number of shares as determined by the Board of Directors. The number of shares that may be issued or transferred pursuant to rights granted under the component of the ESPP that is intended to qualify for favorable U.S. federal tax treatment under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Section 423 Component”) shall not exceed 31 shares. The purchase price will be determined by the administrator of the ESPP and, for purposes of the Section 423 Component, shall not be less than 85 % of the fair value of a share on the first trading day or on the last trading day of the applicable offering period, whichever is lower. The shares available for issuance under the ESPP increased by 224 shares and 31 shares on January 1, 2026 and 2025, respectively. To date, no shares have been sold under the ESPP. There were 330 shares available for issuance as of June 30, 2026. Note 13. Leases BTI leases office space for its corporate headquarters at 555 Long Wharf Drive, New Haven, Connecticut (the “HQ Lease”) under an operating lease that was set to expire in February 2026. The Company did not exercise the option to renew the HQ Lease for an additional five-year term. Prior to the expiration of the HQ Lease, on February 17, 2026, the Company agreed to amend the HQ lease agreement. The amendment extends the lease on a month-to-month basis with a continued monthly base rent payment of $ 33 . As the lease is now on a month-to-month basis, the Company has accounted for the arrangement as a short-term lease and no right-of-use asset or lease liability has been recorded. ​ Lease expense was $ 101 and $ 101 for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $ 204 and $ 202 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. 26 Table of Contents Note 14. Fair Value Measurements The Company groups its assets and liabilities measured at fair value in three levels based on the nature of the inputs and assumptions used to determine fair value. Refer to Note 3, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies , within the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 for additional information on the accounting policies related to fair value. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, net, and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. As of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the Company had $ 12,624 and $ 27,085 , respectively, primarily in money market funds that hold U.S. government cash equivalent instruments (included in cash and cash equivalents) which were valued based on Level 1 inputs. There were no transfers between levels within the hierarchy during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and the year ended December 31, 2025. Derivative liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below. ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ As of ​ ​ June 30, 2026 ​ ​ Level 1 ​ Level 2 ​ Level 3 ​ Total ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Derivative liability - BTI Warrants ​ $ — ​ $ 6,943 ​ $ 167 ​ $ 7,110 Derivative liability - OnkosXcel Warrants ​ ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ — Total derivative liabilities ​ $ — ​ $ 6,943 ​ $ 167 ​ $ 7,110 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ As of ​ ​ December 31, 2025 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Level 1 ​ Level 2 ​ Level 3 ​ Total ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Derivative liability - BTI Warrants ​ $ — ​ $ 1,436 ​ $ 354 ​ $ 1,790 Derivative liability - OnkosXcel Warrants ​ ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ — Total derivative liabilities ​ $ — ​ $ 1,436 ​ $ 354 ​ $ 1,790 ​ Derivative liabilities are comprised of the OnkosXcel Warrants, BTI Warrants, and Option Warrants. The fair value of the derivative liabilities was determined using Binomial Option Pricing and Distribution models for the OnkosXcel Warrants and Option Warrants, and the Black Scholes model was used for the BTI Warrants. The following table presents changes in Level 3 liabilities measured at fair value for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025. Both observable and unobservable inputs were used to determine the fair value of positions that the Company has classified within the Level 3 category. ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Six months ended ​ ​ June 30, ​ ​ 2026 ​ 2025 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Derivative liabilities, Balance - January 1 ​ $ 354 ​ $ 40 Addition of derivative liabilities - BTI Warrant (March 2025 Accompanying Warrants) ​ ​ — ​ ​ 2,831 Addition of derivative liabilities - Option Warrant ​ ​ — ​ ​ 369 Termination of derivative liabilities - Option Warrant ​ ​ — ​ ​ ( 369 ) Change in fair value ​ ​ ( 187 ) ​ ​ ( 1,856 ) Derivative liabilities, Balance - June 30 ​ $ 167 ​ $ 1,015 ​ 27 Table of Contents The derivative liabilities were reported at their fair values in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The change in fair value of the derivative liabilities was reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as Other (income) expense, net, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026. In estimating the fair value of the derivative liability related to the OnkosXcel Warrants, inputs included third-party fair value estimates of OnkosXcel limited liability company units along with the volatility of those units based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock, along with a peer group of comparable publicly traded companies), and the timing and probability of the relevant capital transactions occurring. As of June 30, 2026, the OnkosXcel Warrants had no fair value, as the Company does not anticipate a public offering of OnkosXcel at this time. In estimating the fair value of the derivative liability related to the Option Warrants, the valuation inputs used were a strike price of $ 3.50 , the Company’s stock price of $ 2.70 , volatility of 39.2 % (adjusted to set the value of securities in the March 2025 Offering equal to the consideration paid), a term of 0.04 years and a risk-free rate of 4.39 %. The Option Warrants expired on March 18, 2025 without being exercised, and the Company recorded a termination gain of $ 369 in Other (income) expense, net, in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. In estimating the fair value of the derivative liability related to the BTI Warrants – March 2025 Accompanying Warrants, the valuation inputs used were a strike price of $ 4.20 , the Company’s stock price of $ 2.70 , volatility of 39.2 % (adjusted to set the value of securities in the March 2025 Offering equal to the consideration paid), a term of 5 years and a risk-free rate of 4.01 %. As the fair value measurement of the derivative liability related to the BTI Warrants – March 2025 Accompanying Warrants is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and relies on a significant unobservable input (volatility), the resulting fair value is subject to inherent measurement uncertainty. Reasonably possible changes in the volatility assumption at the reporting date could have resulted in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement and increases in volatility would generally increase the fair value of the warrant liability while decreases in volatility would reduce it. The Company remeasured the fair value of the remaining warrants at June 30, 2026 of $ 167 , and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 recorded a net loss of $ 16 and a net gain of $ 187 , respectively, within Other (income) expense, net in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The valuation inputs used as of June 30, 2026 were a strike price of $ 4.20 , the Company’s stock price of $ 1.41 , volatility of 41.32 %, term of 3.7 years and risk-free rate of 4.17 %. ​ The estimated fair value of the Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 was $ 106,445 and $ 107,850 , respectively. Both observable and unobservable inputs were used to determine the fair value of long-term debt, which was classified within the Level 3 category. The following table presents the BTI warrants issued and outstanding by the Company and the corresponding balance sheet classification: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Warrant Recipient ​ Warrant Type ​ Issue Date ​ Exercise Price ​ Number of Warrants ​ Classification ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Lenders ​ Closing Date Warrants ​ 4/19/2022 ​ $ 7.68 ​ 18 ​ Equity Lenders ​ 2023 Warrants ​ 12/5/2023 ​ $ 7.68 ​ 4 ​ Equity Lenders ​ 2024 Warrants ​ 3/20/2024 ​ $ 7.68 ​ 6 ​ Equity Armistice Capital Master Fund Ltd. ​ Accompanying Warrants ​ 3/27/2024 ​ $ 1.614 ​ 539 ​ Derivative Liability Armistice Capital Master Fund Ltd. ​ November 2024 Accompanying Warrants ​ 11/25/2024 ​ $ 1.614 ​ 846 ​ Derivative Liability Heights Capital Management ​ November 2024 Accompanying Warrants ​ 11/25/2024 ​ $ 7.68 ​ 27 ​ Derivative Liability Hudson Bay Capital Management ​ November 2024 Accompanying Warrants ​ 11/25/2024 ​ $ 7.68 ​ 27 ​ Derivative Liability IntraCoastal Capital, LLC ​ November 2024 Accompanying Warrants ​ 11/25/2024 ​ $ 7.68 ​ 13 ​ Derivative Liability Murchison Capital Partners, LP and assignees ​ March 2025 Accompanying Warrants ​ 3/4/2025 ​ $ 4.20 ​ 1,700 ​ Derivative Liability Armistice Capital Master Fund Ltd. ​ March 2026 Accompanying Warrants ​ 3/11/2026 ​ $ 1.61 ​ 4,500 ​ Derivative Liability Augustus Trading LLC ​ March 2026 Placement Agent Warrants ​ 3/11/2026 ​ $ 2.0175 ​ 79 ​ Equity David Dinkin ​ March 2026 Placement Agent Warrants ​ 3/11/2026 ​ $ 2.0175 ​ 71 ​ Equity Wilson Drive Holdings LLC ​ March 2026 Placement Agent Warrants ​ 3/11/2026 ​ $ 2.0175 ​ 30 ​ Equity Total warrants issued ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 7,860 ​ ​ ​ 28 Table of Contents The fair value of the Closing Date Warrants, which was a non-recurring fair value, was determined as of the date of issuance using a Black-Scholes pricing model and the fair value of $ 3,245 was recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity in Additional-paid-in-capital in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, with the offset recorded as a discount on the amounts funded under the OFA Facilities. This non-recurring measurement is classified as Level 2. The inputs used were a strike price of $ 320.64 , the Company’s stock price of $ 238.88 , volatility of 95 %, term of 7 years and risk-free rate of 2.95 %. As discussed in Note 9, Debt and Credit Facilities, the Company amended and restated the Closing Date Warrants granted to the Lenders to have an exercise price of $ 58.3232 per share. ​ Using a Black-Scholes pricing model, the Company determined that the Closing Date Warrants’ fair values at the original strike price of $ 320.64 and the amended strike price of $ 58.3232 were $ 548 and $ 802 , respectively, as of the Amendment Effective Date. The Closing Date Warrants’ incremental increase in fair value for the repricing of $ 254 , was recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity in Additional-paid-in-capital in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, with the offset recorded as a discount on the amounts refinanced under the Credit Agreement. ​ In connection with a prior amendment to the Credit Agreement, the Company issued 4 “2023 Warrants” at a strike price of $ 58.3232 per share. The fair value of the 2023 Warrants, which is a non-recurring fair value, was determined as of the date of issuance using a Black-Scholes pricing model and the fair value of $ 200 was recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity in Additional-paid-in-capital in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, with the offset recorded as a discount on the amounts funded under the Credit Agreement. This non-recurring measurement is classified as Level 2. The inputs used were a strike price of $ 58.3232 , the Company’s stock price of $ 59.36 , volatility of 99 %, term of 5.4 years and risk-free rate of 4.14 %. ​ In connection with a prior amendment to the Credit Agreement, the Company issued 6 “2024 Warrants” at a strike price of $ 49.1568 per share. The fair value of the “2024 Warrants”, which was a non-recurring fair value, was determined as of the date of issuance using a Black-Scholes pricing model and the fair value of $ 224 was recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity in Additional-paid-in-capital in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, with the offset recorded as a discount on the amounts funded under the OFA Facilities. This non-recurring measurement is classified as Level 2. The inputs used were a strike price of $ 49.1568 , the Company’s stock price of $ 44.48 , volatility of 112.2 %, term of 5 years and risk-free rate of 4.25 %. ​ In addition, in connection with a prior amendment to the Credit Agreement, on the Amendment Effective Date of November 25, 2024, the Company amended and restated the Closing Date Warrants, 2023 Warrants, and 2024 Warrants granted to the Lenders to have an exercise price of $ 7.68 per share. ​ Using a Black-Scholes pricing model, the Company determined that the Closing Date Warrants, 2023 Warrants, and 2024 Warrants’ fair values at the previously amended strike price of $ 58.3232 and original strike price of $ 49.1568 the amended strike price of $ 7.68 were $ 105 and $ 164 , respectively, as of the Amendment Effective Date. The Closing Date Warrants, 2023 Warrants, and 2024 Warrants’ incremental increase in fair value for the repricing of $ 59 , was recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity in Additional-paid-in-capital in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, with the offset recorded as a discount on the amounts refinanced under the Credit Agreement. ​ The fair value of the Accompanying Warrants at issuance on March 25, 2024 was determined using a Black-Scholes pricing model and was recorded as a derivative liability with the offset recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity in Additional-paid-in-capital in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. This fair value measurement is classified as Level 2. On November 25, 2024, 534 of the 539 Accompanying Warrants’ strike price were amended to $ 9.136 . In connection with the March 2026 Offering discussed in Note 11, Common Stock Financing Activities , all 539 Accompanying Warrants’ strike price were amended to $ 1.614 and the term was extended to five years following the closing date of the March 2026 Offering, as part of the consideration provided to one of the investors in the offering. The increase in fair value due to the amended strike price of $ 224 was recorded as an increase in the carrying value of the Derivative liability, with the offset recorded a reduction to Additional paid-in-capital in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company remeasured the Accompanying Warrants’ fair value at June 30, 2026 of $ 630 , and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 recorded a net loss of $ 34 and a 29 Table of Contents net gain of $ 96 , respectively, within Other (income) expense, net in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The valuation inputs used as of June 30, 2026 were a strike price of $ 1.614 , the Company’s stock price of $ 1.41 , volatility of 125.0 %, term of 4.7 years and risk-free rate of 4.19 %. ​ The fair value of the November 2024 Accompanying Warrants at issuance on November 25, 2024 was determined using a Black-Scholes pricing model and was recorded as a derivative liability with the offset recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity in Additional-paid-in-capital in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. This fair value measurement is classified as Level 2. In connection with the March 2026 Offering discussed in Note 11, Common Stock Financing Activities , 846 of the 913 November 2024 Accompanying Warrants’ strike price were amended to $ 1.614 and the term was extended to five years following the closing date of the March 2026 Offering, as part of the consideration provided to one of the investors in the offering. The increase in fair value due to the amended strike price of $ 282 was recorded as an increase in the carrying value of the Derivative liability, with the offset recorded a reduction to Additional paid-in-capital in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company remeasured the November 2024 Accompanying Warrants’ fair value at June 30, 2026 of $ 1,046 , and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 recorded a net loss of $ 56 and a net gain of $ 170 , respectively, within Other (income) expense, net in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The valuation inputs used as of June 30, 2026 for the 846 amended November 2024 Accompanying Warrants were a strike price of $ 1.614 , the Company’s stock price of $ 1.41 , volatility of 125.0 %, term of 4.7 years and risk-free rate of 4.19 %. The valuation inputs used as of June 30, 2026 for the remaining 67 November 2024 Accompanying Warrants were a strike price of $ 7.680 , the Company’s stock price of $ 1.41 , volatility of 136.3 %, term of 3.4 years and risk-free rate of 4.16 %. ​ The fair value of the March 2026 Accompanying Warrants at issuance on March 11, 2026 was determined using a Black-Scholes pricing model and the fair value of $ 5,940 was recorded as a derivative liability with the offset recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity in Additional-paid-in-capital in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. This fair value measurement is classified as Level 2. The valuation inputs used were a strike price of $ 1.614 , the Company’s stock price of $ 1.57 , volatility of 121.8 %, a term of 5 years and a risk-free rate of 3.79 %. The Company remeasured the March 2026 Accompanying Warrants’ fair value at June 30, 2026 of $ 5,267 , and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 recorded a net loss of $ 287 and a net gain of $ 673 , respectively, within Other (income) expense, net in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The valuation inputs used as of June 30, 2026 were a strike price of $ 1.614 , the Company’s stock price of $ 1.41 , volatility of 125.0 %, term of 4.7 years and risk-free rate of 4.19 %. ​ The fair value of the March 2026 Placement Agent Warrants, which was a non-recurring fair value, was determined as of the date of issuance using a Black-Scholes pricing model and the fair value of $ 232 was recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity in Additional-paid-in-capital in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. This non-recurring fair value measurement is classified as Level 2. The valuation inputs used were a strike price of $ 2.0175 , the Company’s stock price of $ 1.57 , volatility of 121.8 %, a term of 5 years and a risk-free rate of 3.79 %. ​ Note 15. Net Loss Per Share Basic and diluted net loss per share are as follows : ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Three months ended ​ Six months ended ​ ​ ​ ​ June 30, ​ June 30, ​ ​ 2026 ​ ​ ​ 2025 ​ 2026 ​ ​ ​ 2025 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Net loss (numerator) ​ $ ( 14,713 ) ​ $ ( 19,187 ) ​ $ ( 27,404 ) ​ $ ( 26,441 ) Weighted average shares (denominator) ​ ​ 30,300 ​ ​ 7,843 ​ ​ 26,954 ​ ​ 6,347 Basic and diluted net loss per share ​ $ ( 0.49 ) ​ $ ( 2.45 ) ​ $ ( 1.02 ) ​ $ ( 4.17 ) ​ Potentially dilutive securities outstanding consists of stock options, RSUs and performance units, and BTI warrants. The Company had common stock equivalents outstanding are as follows: ​ 30 Table of Contents ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ As of ​ ​ June 30, ​ ​ 2026 ​ 2025 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Stock options ​ ​ 467 ​ ​ 351 Restricted stock units ​ ​ 308 ​ ​ 77 Performance stock units ​ ​ — ​ ​ 57 BTI Warrants ​ ​ 7,860 ​ ​ 5,479 Total common stock equivalents ​ ​ 8,635 ​ ​ 5,964 ​ ​ Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies From time to time, in the ordinary course of business, the Company may be subject to litigation and regulatory examinations as well as information gathering requests, inquiries and/or investigations. Other than the items below, the Company is not currently subject to any matters where it believes there is a reasonable possibility that a material loss may be incurred. On July 7, 2023, plaintiff Katelyn Martin filed a class action complaint against the Company and certain executives in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, captioned Martin v. BioXcel Therapeutics, et al. , 3:23-cv-00915 (D. Conn). The case has since been renamed to Hills et al v. BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. et al. On October 4, 2023, pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, the court appointed two co-Lead Plaintiffs. The co-Lead Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on December 5, 2023, alleging violations of Sections 10(b) and 20A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and SEC Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. On July 11, 2024, the Court dismissed the amended complaint without prejudice and, on August 1, 2024, co-Lead Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint. The second amended complaint alleges that defendants made false or misleading statements regarding the TRANQUILITY II trial and the development of BXCL501 for an expanded indication related to the treatment of certain Alzheimer’s-related agitation. The Company moved to dismiss the second amended complaint on September 6, 2024. On February 24, 2025, while the Company’s motion to dismiss remained pending, Plaintiffs moved for leave to further amend their complaint. On September 29, 2025, the Court issued an order granting Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend, denying Defendants’ motion to dismiss as moot, and allowing Plaintiffs to proceed on certain of their claims. The Company filed an answer to the third amended complaint on October 28, 2025. On January 27, 2026, the parties filed a joint motion to vacate deadlines pending settlement, and on February 27, 2026, the parties filed a stipulation regarding settlement. The settlement agreement includes a cash payment of $ 9,750 funded by the Company’s insurance carriers. On March 2, 2026, the Court granted preliminary approval of the settlement. Accordingly, the Company recorded an estimated $ 9,750 liability within Other current liabilities in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets with a corresponding insurance recovery for the 100 % portion to be paid directly by certain of the Company’s insurance carriers within Other current assets in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. In March 2026, the insurance carriers funded the settlement escrow for the $ 9,750 cash settlement. The settlement is subject to the hearing on the motion for final approval, scheduled for September 2, 2026, and no payments will be released from escrow until such approval is granted. Accordingly, the settlement liability and related insurance recovery will remain recorded on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets until final approval of the settlement is obtained. On November 28, 2023, Plaintiffs Pratheesan Panancherry and Jeffrey Bastress filed a stockholder derivative complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut purportedly on behalf of the Company and against Vimal Mehta, Richard I. Steinhart, Peter Mueller, June Bray, Sandeep Laumas, Michael Miller, Michal Votruba, and Krishnan Nandabalan as Defendants, and the Company as Nominal Defendant under the caption Panancherry et al v. Mehta et al , 3:23-cv-1554. Following the initial action, Plaintiffs Maria Vomvolakis (3:24-cv-3) and Kelly Fowler (3:24-cv-203) each filed separate stockholder derivative complaints in the District of Connecticut raising similar claims as Panancherry and Bastress, including business torts and violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The cases have been consolidated under the caption In re BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. Stockholder 31 Table of Contents Derivative Litigation , 3:23-cv-1554 (D. Conn.). On October 30, 2025, the Court entered the parties’ joint stipulation staying the consolidated action until the resolution of Hills v. BioXcel et al , 3:23-cv-00915 (D. Conn.). On January 11, 2024, Plaintiff Jeremy Smith filed a stockholder derivative complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware purportedly on behalf of the Company and against Vimal Mehta, Peter Mueller, June Bray, Sandeep Laumas, Michael Miller, Michal Votruba, Richard I. Steinhart, Robert Risinger, and Krishnan Nandabalan as Defendants, and the Company as Nominal Defendant under the caption Smith v. Mehta et al, 1:24-cv-00041. Following the initial action, Plaintiff Janice Korff filed a stockholder derivative complaint in the District of Delaware raising similar claims as Smith (1:24-cv-130), including business torts and violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The cases have been consolidated under the caption In re BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. Derivative Litigation , 1:24-cv-00041 (D. Del.). On October 30, 2025, the Court entered the parties’ joint stipulation staying the consolidated action until the resolution of Hills v. BioXcel et al , 3:23-cv-00915 (D. Conn.). On May 7, 2025, Plaintiff Yaakov Portnoy filed a stockholder derivative complaint in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware purportedly on behalf of the Company and against Vimal Mehta, Peter Mueller, June Bray, Sandeep “Steve” Laumas, Michael P. Miller, Michal Votruba, Richard I. Steinhart, Robert Risinger, and Krishnan Nandabalan, and the Company as Nominal Defendant under the caption Yaakov Portnoy, derivatively on behalf of BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. v. Vimal Mehta, et al , 2025-0508-BWD (Del. Ch.). The complaint alleges similar claims to those raised in In re BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. Derivative Litigation , 1:24-cv-00041 (D. Del.), including business torts. On January 27, 2026, the Court entered the parties’ joint stipulation staying the case until the resolution of Hills v. BioXcel et al , 3:23-cv-00915 (D. Conn.). On March 20, 2026, Plaintiff Travis Vrana filed a stockholder derivative complaint purportedly on behalf of the Company and against Peter Mueller, June Bray, Sandeep Laumas, David Mack, Vimal Mehta, Michael Miller, Rajiv Patni, Michal Votruba, Richard I. Steinhart, and Robert Risinger as Defendants, and the Company as Nominal Defendant under the caption Vrana v. Mueller et al , 3:26-cv-00423 (D. Conn.). The complaint alleges similar claims to those raised in In re BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation , 3:23-cv-1554 (D. Conn.), including business torts and violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 . On May 19, 2026, the Court in Vrana v. Mueller et al , 3:26-cv-00423 (D. Conn.), entered the parties’ joint stipulation staying that case for a period of 90 days . On May 15, 2026, Plaintiff Chirag Mody filed a stockholder derivative complaint purportedly on behalf of the Company and against Vimal Mehta, Peter Mueller, June Bray, Sandeep Laumas, Michael Miller, Michal Votruba, Richard I. Steinhart, Robert Risinger, and Krishnan Nandabalan as Defendants, and the Company as Nominal Defendant under the caption Mody v. Mehta et al , 3:25-cv-00762 (D. Conn.). The complaint alleges similar claims to those raised in In re BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation , 3:23-cv-1554 (D. Conn.), including business torts and violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On July 14, 2026, the Court in Mody v. Mehta et al , 3:25-cv-00762 (D. Conn.), entered the parties’ joint stipulation staying that case for a period of 90 days. At this time, the Company does not believe the claims in the above-captioned matters have merit, and intends to vigorously defend against them; however, the potential costs and liabilities associated with this litigation are uncertain. In April 2022, the Company signed a commercial supply agreement that requires minimum annual payments for the first three years of the agreement that in aggregate total $ 10,000 for the three-year period, of which $ 5,000 was originally due in year ended 2024. On July 11, 2024, the Company entered into an amendment to the commercial supply agreement (the “Product Supply Agreement Amendment”) that reduces the specified minimum annual payment over the next three years starting in the year ended 2024 and, thereafter, for a specified interval, provides for minimum annual payments to the extent that the Company receives approval of a supplemental new drug application (sNDA) or a new drug application (NDA) from the FDA for enumerated indications. The Company’s renegotiated agreement reduced the minimum commitment for 2024 to $ 1,000 and thereafter for the term of the agreement in annual amounts ranging from $ 2,000 to $ 5,000 subject, in certain instances, to the extent that the Company receives approval of an sNDA or NDA from the FDA for enumerated indications. In accordance with the Product Supply Agreement Amendment, the minimum commitments were reduced to $ 1,000 , $ 2,000 and $ 2,000 in the years 2024, 2025, and 2026. In addition, the Company agreed to make a reconciliation payment of $ 1,200 in the third quarter of 2024 for full settlement for amounts due prior to the July 11, 2024 amendment. 32 Table of Contents Note 17. Segment Information The Company views its operations and manages its business as one operating and reportable segment, utilizing artificial intelligence (“AI”) to develop transformative medicines in neuroscience and immuno-oncology. The Company is focused on utilizing cutting-edge technology and innovative research to develop high-value therapeutics aimed at transforming patients’ lives. The Company’s approach employs a unique AI platform to reduce therapeutic development costs and potentially accelerate development timelines. Consistent with the operational structure, the Chief Executive Officer, as the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), reviews weekly cash usage and allocates resources based on consolidated net loss that also is reported on the consolidated statements of operations. The measure of segment assets is reported on the balance sheet as total consolidated assets. The CODM utilizes consolidated net loss by comparing actual results against budgeted amounts on a quarterly basis. As part of this process, consolidated net loss is a critical performance measure used to evaluate the Company’s operating performance and guide strategic decisions and resource allocations, including additional investments in research and development and commercialization activities. ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Three months ended ​ Six months ended ​ ​ June 30, ​ June 30, ​ ​ ​ ​ 2026 ​ ​ ​ 2025 ​ ​ ​ 2026 ​ ​ ​ 2025 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Product revenue, net ​ $ 182 ​ $ 120 ​ $ 388 ​ $ 288 Less: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Cost of goods sold ​ $ 22 ​ $ 107 ​ $ 305 ​ $ 121 Research and development costs: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Personnel and related costs ​ $ 1,404 ​ $ 1,585 ​ $ 2,869 ​ $ 3,267 Non-cash stock-based compensation ​ ​ 51 ​ ​ 648 ​ ​ 130 ​ ​ 134 Professional fees ​ ​ 501 ​ ​ 1,007 ​ ​ 1,043 ​ ​ 1,786 Clinical trials expense ​ ​ 334 ​ ​ 6,119 ​ ​ 717 ​ ​ 8,137 Chemical, manufacturing and controls cost ​ ​ 632 ​ ​ 535 ​ ​ 823 ​ ​ 710 Other expenses ​ ​ 242 ​ ​ 362 ​ ​ 537 ​ ​ 776 Total research and development costs ​ $ 3,164 ​ $ 10,256 ​ $ 6,119 ​ $ 14,810 Commercial costs: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Personnel and related costs ​ ​ 78 ​ ​ 84 ​ ​ 156 ​ ​ 163 Non-cash stock-based compensation ​ ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ - Professional fees ​ ​ 74 ​ ​ 138 ​ ​ 92 ​ ​ 176 Commercial and marketing ​ ​ 52 ​ ​ 38 ​ ​ 146 ​ ​ 207 Travel related expenses ​ ​ 3 ​ ​ 12 ​ ​ 6 ​ ​ 21 Other expenses ​ ​ 10 ​ ​ ( 45 ) ​ ​ 24 ​ ​ ( 133 ) Total commercial costs ​ $ 217 ​ $ 227 ​ $ 424 ​ $ 434 Selling, general and administrative costs: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Personnel and related costs ​ ​ 1,104 ​ ​ 946 ​ $ 2,160 ​ $ 1,939 Non-cash stock-based compensation ​ ​ 307 ​ ​ 908 ​ 663 ​ ​ 1,602 Professional fees ​ ​ 4,794 ​ ​ 2,572 ​ 9,312 ​ ​ 5,406 Travel related expenses ​ ​ 38 ​ ​ 132 ​ ​ 110 ​ ​ 248 Other expenses ​ ​ 729 ​ ​ 824 ​ 1,711 ​ ​ 1,679 Total selling, general and administrative costs ​ $ 6,972 ​ $ 5,382 ​ $ 13,956 ​ $ 10,874 Total operating expenses ​ $ 10,375 ​ $ 15,972 ​ $ 20,804 ​ $ 26,239 Other (income) expense ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Interest expense ​ 4,257 ​ 4,222 ​ 8,455 ​ 8,215 Interest income ​ ​ ( 131 ) ​ ​ ( 230 ) ​ ​ ( 342 ) ​ ​ ( 509 ) Other (income) expense, net ​ ​ 394 ​ ​ ( 657 ) ​ ​ ( 1,125 ) ​ ​ ( 7,216 ) Segment net loss ​ $ ( 14,713 ) ​ $ ( 19,187 ) ​ $ ( 27,404 ) ​ $ ( 26,441 ) Adjustments and reconciling items ​ ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ — ​ ​ — Consolidated Net Loss ​ $ ( 14,713 ) ​ $ ( 19,187 ) ​ $ ( 27,404 ) ​ $ ( 26,441 ) 33 Table of Contents ​ ​ ​ Note 18. Subsequent Events Tenth Amendment to Credit Agreement On July 3, 2026, the Company entered into the Tenth Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the “Tenth Amendment”) by and among the Company, as the borrower, the Lenders and OFA as administrative agent, which included (i) payment in kind of accrued and unpaid interest through and including June 30, 2026, by capitalizing and adding such interest to the outstanding principal amount of the Loans as of such date, (ii) deferral of the payment of principal that was originally due on June 30, 2026 until July 31, 2026, at which point the Company will be obligated to make a payment of $ 9,017 (constituting the principal and interest that were due and payable on June 30, 2026), plus all accrued interest and fees on such amount through and including July 31, 2026 and (iii) reduction of the Credit Agreement’s minimum liquidity covenant to require minimum cash liquidity of $ 7,500 (instead of $ 12,500 ). In addition, pursuant to the Tenth Amendment: ● The Company is required to, on or prior to July 31, 2026, enter into definitive agreements with respect to one or more transactions acceptable to Lenders that (a) would result in the repayment of all loan and other obligations under the Credit Agreement or (b) is an alternative capital solutions transaction on terms and conditions acceptable to the Lenders. ● The Company agreed to permit any and all transfers or assignments of all or any portion of the loans, commitments, claims or other rights, interests or obligations of any Lender under or in respect of the Credit Agreement to any third party. In addition, the Company agreed to waive or otherwise release any and all restrictions contained in any contract between the Company and a third party on such third party’s ability to receive such assignments or transfers. ● The Company agreed to establish and maintain a strategic process committee of its board of directors, which committee shall be comprised solely of David Mack (and/or such other independent director acceptable to the Lenders and that is not a member of the Board as of the Tenth Amendment Effective Date), that will have the full and exclusive authority to evaluate, negotiate, oversee, coordinate and implement any sale, restructuring or other material transaction, including any equity raise, sale or business combination transaction, out-of-court restructuring, in-court restructuring, bankruptcy or insolvency filing or similar transaction and any other matters or actions as may be necessary or advisable to effectuate any of the foregoing. ● The Company agreed to certain additional reporting and information covenants, including a requirement to hold a weekly meeting with the Lenders and the Company’s financial advisors, and a requirement to deliver to the Lenders a 13-week cash flow budget and financial report on a bi-weekly basis. The Company will not be permitted to make disbursements for any two-week period in excess of 115 % of the aggregate budgeted amount of disbursements for the applicable period. ● The Company agreed to certain additional negative covenants applicable following the Tenth Amendment Effective Date, which, among other things, prohibit the Company from, subject to limited exceptions, (i) making any dividend, distribution or repurchase with respect to its equity interests, (ii) making any investments, (iii) disposing of or granting any license in the Company’s assets, (iv) incurring or suffering to exist any indebtedness or liens, and (v) becoming party to or bound by, or canceling, terminating, modifying or amending in any material respect, or waiving any material rights under any material contract. ● Through July 31, 2026, the Company is prohibited from entering into, terminating, or otherwise modifying any compensation arrangement with its directors, officers or employees, or making any non-ordinary course payments to, or materially increasing the compensation or benefits of, such persons. 34 Table of Contents ● The Company paid to the Lenders a fee equal to 100 basis points (or 1.00 % ) of the principal amount of the Loans outstanding as of the effective date of the Tenth Amendment, which was paid in kind by adding such amount to the outstanding principal amount of the Loans on the effective date of the Tenth Amendment. Eleventh Amendment to Credit Agreement On July 31, 2026, the Company entered into the Eleventh Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the “Eleventh Amendment”), which amended the Credit Agreement. Pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment, the Lenders agreed to (i) defer the payment of principal that was originally due on June 30, 2026, which was previously deferred to July 31, 2026 pursuant to the Tenth Amendment, until August 31, 2026 at which point the Company is obligated to make a payment of $ 9,017 (constituting the principal and interest that were due and payable on June 30, 2026) plus all accrued interest and fees through August 31, 2026 and (ii) reduce the Credit Agreement’s minimum liquidity covenant to require minimum cash liquidity of $ 6,250 (instead of $ 7,500 ). In addition, pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment: ● The Company is required to, on or prior to August 10, 2026, enter into definitive agreements with respect to one or more transactions acceptable to Lenders that (a) would result in the repayment of all loan and other obligations under the Credit Agreement or (b) is an alternative capital solutions transaction on terms and conditions acceptable to the Lenders. ● Through August 10, 2026 (extended from July 31, 2026, as was provided under the Tenth Amendment), the Company is prohibited from entering into, terminating, or otherwise modifying any compensation arrangement with its directors, officers or employees, or making any non-ordinary course payments to, or materially increasing the compensation or benefits of, such persons. Twelfth Amendment to Credit Agreement On August 10, 2026, the Company entered into the Twelfth Amendment to Credit Agreement (the “Twelfth Amendment”), which amended the Credit Agreement. Pursuant to the Twelfth Amendment, the Company is required to, on or prior to August 21, 2026 (extended from August 10, 2026, as was required under the Eleventh Amendment), enter into definitive agreements with respect to one or more transactions acceptable to Lenders that (A) would result in the repayment of all loan and other obligations under the Credit Agreement or (B) is an alternative capital solutions transaction on terms and conditions acceptable to the Lenders. Pursuant to the Twelfth Amendment, the Lenders also agreed to reduce the Credit Agreement’s minimum liquidity covenant to require minimum cash liquidity of $ 3,000 (instead of $ 6,250 , as under the Eleventh Amendment). 35 Table of Contents Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report and the audited financial statements and related notes contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. In addition to historical information, this discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those discussed below and in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include, without limitation, those discussed in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, those listed under “Summary Risk Factors,” and those discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” included in Part II, Item 1A. of this report. All dollar amounts in the below Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are presented in U.S. dollars, and all dollar and share amounts are presented in thousands, unless otherwise noted or the context otherwise provides. Overview BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: BTAI, “the Company”) is a biopharmaceutical company built on artificial intelligence (“AI”) to develop transformative medicines in neuroscience. Our wholly owned subsidiary, OnkosXcel Therapeutics, is focused on the development of medicines in immuno-oncology. We have utilized cutting-edge technology and innovative research to develop high-value therapeutics aimed at transforming patients’ lives. We developed a proprietary AI platform to reduce therapeutic development costs and potentially accelerate development timelines. Our approach leverages existing approved drugs and/or clinically evaluated product candidates together with big data and proprietary machine learning algorithms to identify new therapeutic indications. We believe this differentiated approach has proven its potential to reduce the expense and time associated with drug development in diseases with substantial unmet medical needs. ​ Due to the fact that we were unable to generate sufficient cash flows from operations or obtain sufficient funding to sustain operations and debt service obligations, management and our board of directors determined that it was in the best interests of the stockholders to seek strategic options. We hired advisors to explore strategic options, including, but not limited to, restructuring or refinancing our debt, seeking additional debt or equity capital investment, a sale or licensing transaction for of all or a portion of our assets, a combination of these, or other strategic options. We currently have no commitments to engage in any specific strategic transaction and there can be no assurance that we will be able to complete additional or alternative financings, business development transactions or other strategic alternatives. If we cannot continue as a viable entity, we may be required to seek relief under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. There can be no guarantees that if we file for bankruptcy we will emerge from bankruptcy as a going concern or that holders of our common stock will receive any recovery from any bankruptcy proceedings. Further, certain strategic alternatives will require the consent of our Lenders pursuant to the covenants in our Credit Agreement. Additionally, pursuant to the Twelfth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, we are required to, on or prior to August 21, 2026 (extended from August 10, 2026, as was required under the Eleventh Amendment), to enter into definitive agreements with respect to one or more transactions acceptable to Lenders that (A) would result in the repayment of all loan and other obligations under the Credit Agreement or (B) is an alternative capital solutions transaction on terms and conditions acceptable to the Lenders, and there is no assurance that we will be able to complete a strategic alternative before that date . ​ Our Business Our most advanced neuroscience candidate is BXCL501. In indications other than those approved by the FDA as IGALMI ® , BXCL501 is an investigational, proprietary, orally dissolving sublingual film formulation of dexmedetomidine in development for the treatment of agitation associated with psychiatric and neurological disorders. Our most advanced immuno-oncology asset, BXCL701, is an investigational oral innate immune activator from OnkosXcel Therapeutics as a potential therapy for the treatment of aggressive forms of prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, and other solid and liquid tumors. ​ On April 6, 2022, we announced that the FDA approved IGALMI ® (dexmedetomidine) sublingual film for the acute treatment of agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar I or II disorder in adults. IGALMI ® is approved to 36 Table of Contents be self-administrated by patients under the supervision of a health care provider. On July 6, 2022, we announced that IGALMI ® was commercially available in doses of 120 and 180 micrograms (“mcg”). ​ On August 27, 2025, we announced that the SERENITY At-Home Pivotal Phase 3 trial evaluating the safety of BXCL501, as an acute treatment for agitation associated with bipolar disorders or schizophrenia in the at-home setting, met its primary objective. This study was designed and implemented to remove the healthcare supervision requirement and to allow multiple doses after an initial single dose. The data from this study formed the basis of the sNDA submission for a label expansion of IGALMI ® into the at-home setting. The sNDA was filed with the FDA on January 14, 2026. On April 1, 2026, we announced that the FDA has accepted our sNDA for approval of IGALMI ® for at-home use in the acute treatment of agitation associated with bipolar disorders or schizophrenia. The FDA has assigned a Prescription Drug User Fee Act (“PDUFA”) target action date of November 14, 2026. ​ On September 10, 2025, we further announced positive topline exploratory efficacy data from the SERENITY At-Home Pivotal Phase 3 safety trial, which demonstrated BXCL501 had sustained effects on agitation and consistent benefit with repeat dosing. ​ On October 10, 2025, we announced positive results from the correlation study related to exploratory efficacy outcomes from the SERENITY At-Home trial. The results demonstrated a strong correlation between the clinician assessments and the patient or caregiver (informant) assessments. The results, along with the data from the SERENITY At-Home trial, have been included in the sNDA filed with the FDA on January 14, 2026. ​ Our TRANQUILITY program is designed to evaluate BXCL501 as a potential treatment option for agitation associated with Alzheimer’s dementia in the outpatient or at-home setting and in-care facilities. We have had several FDA meetings to discuss the development program, and the FDA has commented on the proposed protocol for our TRANQUILITY In-Care Phase 3 trial, which is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 60 mcg dose of BXCL501 for agitation associated with Alzheimer’s dementia. We have plans for initiation of the trial pending funding. ​ As described further below, we have deprioritized the development of BXCL501 for certain other proposed indications. ​ Our most advanced immuno-oncology candidate, BXCL701, is an investigational oral innate immune activator from OnkosXcel Therapeutics as a potential therapy for the treatment of aggressive forms of prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, and other solid and liquid tumors. As described further below, we have deprioritized the development of our BXCL701 programs, except as noted under “Immuno-Oncology” below. ​ IGALMI ® Commercialization Strategy ​ We are continuing to supply IGALMI ® through existing distribution channels. At the same time, while seeking potential commercial partners, we are maintaining IGALMI’s market presence with minimal commercial resources following our Clinical Reprioritization. Our commercialization efforts are designed to build the foundation to launch additional potential follow-on indications. If IGALMI ® would be approved outside the U.S., we would consider launching the product through collaborations with third parties. However, no foreign applications have been made at this time. On January 12, 2026, we announced the appointment of an Interim Chief Commercial Officer to support the potential launch of IGALMI ® in the at-home setting. In conjunction with the appointment of the Interim Chief Commercial Officer, on February 12, 2026, we announced the completion of an updated market opportunity assessment for IGALMI ® for acute agitation associated with bipolar disorders or schizophrenia in the at-home (outpatient) setting, informed by results from the SERENITY At-Home clinical study. The commercial opportunity assessment was based on recently completed market research leveraging an updated Target Product Profile based on results from the SERENITY At-Home clinical study. The assessment incorporated 37 Table of Contents interviews with 15 prescribers and 5 payers with leadership responsibility at large health plans as well as survey responses from 180 prescribers with extensive relevant experience. In addition, patient-level claims analyses were used to estimate the number of diagnosed and treated patients who may be candidates for IGALMI. Current agitation landscape insights: ● Prescribers reported a moderate to high unmet need, noting that current treatment options are not indicated for at-home use, may be sedating, are slow to take effect, and/or are controlled substances with the potential to cause dependence. ● Analyses of market research and claims data identified approximately 2.3 million treated bipolar disorder and schizophrenia patients experiencing frequent episodes of acute agitation in the at-home setting in the United States, of whom up to 1.8 million may be eligible for IGALMI treatment. This represents up to 86 million addressable annual episodes that may require treatment. This updated estimate is generally consistent with prior estimates of approximately 57-77 million addressable annual episodes, with further refinement based on the additional insights from market research. IGALMI opportunity in the at-home setting: ● Prescribers reported moderate to high interest in IGALMI for the treatment of acute agitation in the at-home setting, projecting use in approximately 70% of their schizophrenia and bipolar disorder patients, regardless of agitation severity. ● Prescribers anticipated that IGALMI would be used either alone or in combination with existing off-label treatments for acute agitation, and that IGALMI would most frequently replace benzodiazepines, which may cause dependence. ● Payers indicated expectations for broad formulary coverage with standard adjudication controls. ● Previously reported patient and caregiver research (N=80) indicated that patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder would expect to use IGALMI in approximately 80% of their acute agitation episodes. ​ 38 Table of Contents Our Neuroscience Clinical Programs and Investigator-Sponsored Trials ​ The following is a summary of the status of our major neuroscience clinical development programs and investigator-sponsored trials as of the date of this Quarterly Report. ​ ​ About BXCL501 BXCL501 is our most advanced neuroscience clinical candidate. In indications other than those approved by the FDA as IGALMI ® , BXCL501 is an investigational, proprietary, orally dissolving sublingual film formulation of dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha-2 receptor agonist, targeting symptoms from stress-related behaviors such as agitation. As a selective adrenergic agonist with a sublingual or buccal route of administration, BXCL501 is designed to be easy to administer and has shown a relatively rapid onset of action in multiple clinical trials, studying patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorders, and dementia associated with Alzheimer’s disease. We believe the results from these studies suggest that BXCL501 has the potential to generate a calming effect without producing excessive sedation. We also believe BXCL501 is highly differentiated from antipsychotics and benzodiazepines, which are currently used as first-line standard-of-care treatment for agitation despite often producing unwanted side effects such as excessive sedation or extra pyramidal motor effects. Managing patient agitation in neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders represents a significant challenge for physicians and caregivers. We believe BXCL501 has the potential to address these challenges and, if approved for the respective indications, has the potential to become the standard of care for the acute treatment of agitation associated with these disorders. In addition, based on its mechanism of action, we believe BXCL501 has the potential to address some behavioral symptoms of several additional diseases or conditions, including opioid use disorder (“OUD”), acute stress disorder (“ASD”) and post-traumatic stress disorder (“PTSD”). BXCL501 is currently being evaluated for treatment of patients with those conditions in clinical trials sponsored by leading academic research institutions. See Government-Supported Investigator-Sponsored Trials (“ISTs”) below. 39 Table of Contents BXCL501 Late-Stage Clinical Programs SERENITY Program: Acute Treatment of Agitation Associated with Bipolar I or II Disorder or Schizophrenia Under our SERENITY program, we are focused on the continued development of BXCL501 (currently marketed and commercialized as IGALMI ® ) as a potential treatment option for agitation associated with bipolar I or II disorder or schizophrenia in the outpatient or at-home setting. We completed the clinical study of BXCL501 in patients with agitation associated with bipolar disorders or schizophrenia in SERENITY III, which consisted of two parts. The first part was comparable to our pivotal SERENITY I and II studies. Using similar inclusion and exclusion criterion under a well-controlled in-patient setting, acutely agitated patients with bipolar disorders or schizophrenia were randomized to self-administer either 60 mcg of BXCL501 or placebo in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. The primary endpoint of Part I was efficacy, as measured by the change in PEC score change from baseline at two hours post-dose. The secondary objectives of Part I were safety and tolerability. On August 18, 2025 we announced that the Company had received positive pre-sNDA meeting responses from the FDA. ​ The primary purpose of the planned pre-sNDA meeting on August 20, 2025 with the FDA was to gain alignment with the FDA regarding the content and format of the Company’s planned sNDA submission for the at-home (outpatient) use of BXCL501, including the clinical, nonclinical, and chemistry and manufacturing and controls (CMC) requirements. The Company concluded that the objectives of the pre-sNDA meeting had been accomplished based on the FDA’s written responses and determined that the meeting, originally scheduled for August 20, 2025, was no longer required. The pre-sNDA preliminary meeting comments received from FDA on August 14, 2025, will serve as the official record. Acceptance of the sNDA will be subject to the FDA’s review of the complete filing. ​ On August 27, 2025 we announced that the SERENITY At-Home Pivotal Phase 3 trial evaluating the safety of BXCL501, the Company’s proprietary, sublingual film formulation of dexmedetomidine, as an acute treatment for agitation associated with bipolar disorders or schizophrenia in the at-home setting, met its primary objective. The data from this successful study formed the basis of the sNDA submission for label expansion of IGALMI ® in the at-home setting. ​ SERENITY At-Home Topline Summary ● Summary of agitation episodes: ● A total of 246 patients randomized ● Data collected 2,628 agitation episodes in 215 patients ● Treated 2,437 episodes in 208 patients ● 168 patients (81%) completed the full 12-week trial ● Average of 11.7 agitation episodes recorded per treated patient ● All patients were able to successfully self-administer the film ● Distribution of enrolled patients was 45% bipolar disorders and 55% schizophrenia ​ SERENITY AT-Home Primary Endpoint Data The 120 mcg dose of BXCL501 was safe and well-tolerated in patients with episodes of agitation in the outpatient setting and met the primary objective. ● No discontinuations due to tolerability in the BXCL501 arm ● Adverse event profile consistent with approved IGALMI ® label and multiple clinical trials in the institutional setting ● No drug-related serious adverse events (SAEs), syncopes or falls reported 40 Table of Contents ● No new or unexpected treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) ● No severe TEAEs associated with BXCL501 treatment and most TEAEs were mild ● No trend of more frequent AEs over time or with repeat dosing ● Tolerability remained consistent throughout the repeat dosing in the trial ​ On September 10, 2025, we announced positive topline exploratory efficacy data from the SERENITY At-Home Pivotal Phase 3 safety trial, which demonstrated that BXCL501 had continued effects and consistent benefit with repeat dosing. While this trial was not powered for efficacy assessments, these findings seen in the trial further support the potential of BXCL501 for use in the outpatient setting. ​ Effect Across Total Number of Agitation Episodes ​ Across 2,433 treated episodes in the trial, BXCL501 demonstrated a significant mean reduction in the modified Clinical Global Impression–Severity (mCGI-S) score from baseline compared to placebo at 2 hours (p<.05). ​ Effect Across Severity of Agitation Episodes ​ Patients experienced a complete resolution of agitation symptoms measured by mCGI-S at significantly higher rates with BXCL501 compared to placebo across severity of agitation episodes, with an overall resolution of 50% in the BXCL501 arm, compared to 33% on placebo (p <.0001). Severe agitation episodes fully resolved (no agitation) in 61% of episodes in the BXCL501 arm, compared to 18% on placebo (p <.0001). Moderate agitation episodes fully resolved in 43% of cases for patients in the BXCL501 arm, compared to 34% on placebo (p <.0005). Mild agitation episodes fully resolved in 60% of cases for patients in the BXCL501, compared to 40% on placebo (p <.0001). In sum, complete resolution of agitation was significantly higher with BXCL501 compared to placebo regardless of agitation episode severity. ​ Effect Across Number of Treated Agitation Episodes ​ The mean reduction in agitation symptoms experienced by patients following administration of BXCL501 was maintained throughout repeated dosing in the trial. There was a mean reduction in mCGI-S score of 1.2 following the first 12 doses and a mean reduction of 1.4 following 13 or more doses of BXCL501. This underscores the potential of BXCL501 to continue to provide benefit across repeated dosing. ​ Efficacy Across Duration of the Trial ​ The reduction in agitation symptoms experienced by patients following administration of BXCL501 was also maintained throughout the trial’s duration. Evaluating the 12-week trial period on a time-based scale, agitation episodes treated with BXCL501 during weeks 1-4, 5-8 and 9-12 all had a mean reduction in mCGI-S score of 1.3. This underscores the potential of BXCL501 to maintain a sustained benefit across longer treatment durations. ​ The standard method for measuring acute agitation associated with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder is the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale – Excited Component (PEC) administered by a trained clinician, which was used in the Serenity I & II Pivotal Trials. In order to evaluate BXCL501 for continued clinical effect with repeat dosing in the at-home setting using an exploratory efficacy measurement, the Company, in consultation with FDA, developed the modified CGI-S (mCGI-S) scale, which can be scored by patients and/or caregivers. The study assessed the correlation between PEC and mCGI-S in this prospective, open label, in-clinic trial in 33 patients. ​ On October 14, 2025, we announced that results from the 33 patient open label trial demonstrated a strong correlation between the clinician assessments and the patient or caregiver (informant) rated outcomes, providing support for using mCGI-S to assess efficacy in the outpatient setting. A statistically significant and strong correlation between the PEC and mCGI-S with a correlation of ρ=0.89; p<0.0001 for patients and ρ=0.88; p<0.0001 for informants was observed. ​ There were no serious adverse events reported and the safety profile remains consistent with the IGALMI ® label. 41 Table of Contents ​ An sNDA was submitted on January 14, 2026 for the acute treatment of agitation in schizophrenia and bipolar disorders in the unsupervised (at-home) setting. On April 1, 2026 we announced that the U.S. FDA has accepted the supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) for approval of IGALMI® for at-home use in the acute treatment of agitation in the home setting. The FDA has assigned a Prescription Drug User Fee Act (“PDUFA”) target action date of November 14, 2026. ​ TRANQUILITY Program: Acute Treatment of Agitation Associated with Dementia due to Probable Alzheimer’s Disease (“AAD”) Under our TRANQUILITY program, we are evaluating BXCL501 as a potential treatment option for the acute treatment of agitation associated with Alzheimer’s dementia (“AAD”). On June 29, 2023, we announced positive topline results from our TRANQUILITY II Phase 3 trial. The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of BXCL501 for the acute treatment of AAD in adults 65 years and older with mild to moderate dementia in assisted living facilities and residential care settings who required minimal assistance with activities of daily living. On June 29, 2023, we also announced that we had learned that an investigator in the TRANQUILITY II study engaged in misconduct. Since that time, we have taken steps to further investigate and evaluate the conduct of the trial at the investigator’s clinical site. On October 25, 2023, we announced that an independent third-party audit of data integrity at the trial site did not identify any findings that they believed impacted the data reliability or integrity, nor did they find any evidence of additional misconduct or fraud. On March 3, 2025, we announced that the FDA concluded that the inspection of the single site in the trial was closed under 21 C.F.R.20.64(d)(3) and released the Establishment Inspection Report, designating “Voluntary Action Indicated” for the site. Based on these steps to date, we believe that there have been no further instances of misconduct or fraud or other findings that adversely impact the data integrity or reliability of the eligibility, safety, and efficacy data obtained at the clinical trial site in question. Based on subsequent meetings with and feedback from the FDA, we plan to generate additional Phase 3 efficacy and safety data, in relevant care-facility settings and across severity of dementia, in our TRANQUILITY In-Care trial. On September 5, 2024, we submitted to the FDA the proposed protocol for the trial, a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 60 mcg dose of BXCL501 for acute treatment of AAD in the care setting. On November 12, 2024, we announced that we had received FDA feedback on the proposed protocol. The Company is advancing plans for initiation of the trial upon funding and has selected a CRO to prepare for trial initiation upon funding. At a future meeting with the FDA, we plan to further discuss our trial design and the details of the requirement for long-term safety data. Adjunctive treatment in Major Depressive Disorder (“MDD”) We were previously evaluating BXCL501 as an adjunctive treatment for MDD. The initial clinical study in this program was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending dose (“MAD”) trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of daily doses of BXCL501 in healthy volunteers. As part of the Clinical Reprioritization we paused our plan to develop a Phase 2 human proof-of-concept trial design to investigate BXCL501 as a potential adjunctive treatment and its potential accelerant effect in combination with first-line selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. Pediatric Study In June 2021, we initiated a global clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BXCL501 in the acute treatment of agitation associated with schizophrenia and bipolar disorders in the pediatric population, in part to fulfill pediatric study requirements agreed to with the FDA in connection with the approval of IGALMI ® . The trial protocol has been reviewed by the FDA, as well as by the European Medicines Agency, to fulfill potential commitments to study the effects of BXCL501 in pediatric patients ages 13 to 17 with schizophrenia and ages 10 to 17 with bipolar disorders. Enrollment of patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar I, and bipolar II disorder is ongoing in this multisite, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group trial. Approximately 63% of the 42 Table of Contents 150 total subjects have been enrolled in the U.S. and 93 of such subjects have completed the clinical trial. In July 2023, we stopped activities in the European region as enrollment and site recruitment was unproductive. Similar to our registration trials in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (SERENITY I and II), the primary endpoint is the change from baseline PEC total score at two hours. The U.S. portion of this program remains active following the Clinical Reprioritization. ​ In October 2024, we submitted a request to the FDA for an extension to complete the study; a three year extension was granted in December 2024. An updated trial protocol was submitted in March 2026 to complete enrollment requirements for pediatric patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. ​ To support pediatrics in the at-home setting, FDA has requested an at-home/ outpatient study in pediatric patients following the inpatient study. The design of this study will be discussed and agreed with FDA prior to initiating it. ​ IGALMI ® Post-Marketing Requirement Study On June 25, 2024, we announced positive topline results from our post-marketing requirement study evaluating whether tolerance, tachyphylaxis, or withdrawal occur following repeat dosing of the 180 mcg (highest approved dose) of IGALMI ® . This study was a single-arm, open-label study of 28 inpatient adults with frequent episodes of agitation associated with bipolar disorders or schizophrenia who self-administered 180 mcg dose of IGALMI ® as needed over seven days. A total of 83 episodes were treated. The study achieved its objective and demonstrated no evidence of tachyphylaxis, tolerance, or withdrawal, and IGALMI ® was generally well tolerated during the study. ​ Additional Neuroscience Opportunities BXCL501 Pipeline Opportunities for Franchise Expansion Based on its potential mechanism of action, we believe BXCL501 has the potential for broad applicability across several indications where agitation is a symptom of a condition or underlying disease. Research published in the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology showed that BXCL501 caused a significant reduction in behaviors induced by stress in translatable behavioral models related to psychiatric disorders, providing further support for the drug’s mechanism of action and potential suitability for broadly addressing stress-related disorders in addition to agitation. Government-Supported Investigator-Sponsored Trials (“ISTs”) ​ Our research partners have been awarded grants for the development of BXCL501 in alcohol use disorder (“AUD”) with comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder (“PTSD”), opioid use disorder (“OUD”), and acute stress disorder (“ASD”). The Company has provided, regulatory and operational support and investigational product for these development opportunities, which are being funded through Cooperative Agreements with the U.S. Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program and National Institute on Drug Abuse (“NIDA”). Clinical and regulatory responsibilities are led by clinical researchers and regulatory staff at the Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, Yale University Medical School, RTI International, Columbia University New York State Psychiatric Institute, and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. ​ Opioid Use Disorder (“OUD”) ​ As the Company previously announced, NIDA awarded a grant to Columbia University to fund clinical testing of BXCL501 as a potential treatment for mitigation of opioid withdrawal symptoms in patients diagnosed with OUD. The original 160-patient, three-site, four-arm study is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy inpatient study comparing BXCL501 (180 mcg and 240 mcg BID), lofexidine (as a positive control), and placebo. The study’s goal was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BXCL501 relative to lofexidine and placebo in subjects with OUD. A majority of OUD patients participating in the study were anticipated to be exposed to fentanyl adulterated or associated with xylazine. To date, four different sites have recruited, enrolled, and dosed patients diagnosed with OUD who are physically dependent on opioids, including prescription opioids. The Company supplied BXCL501 for the study, which was sponsored by Columbia University. The study was subsequently stopped at 80 patients, or approximately one-half the original total. 43 Table of Contents ​ On March 5, 2026, the Company announced positive topline results from the Columbia Phase 2 investigator-sponsored trial evaluating BXCL501 for the treatment of opioid withdrawal symptoms in adults with opioid use disorder undergoing a methadone taper. In the study, BXCL501 240 µg BID reduced opioid withdrawal symptoms compared to placebo during a seven-day methadone taper, as measured by the Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale-Gossop (SOWS-Gossop). After receiving BXCL501 240 µg, patients experienced a greater than 30% reduction in SOWS-Gossop scores, with peak symptom improvement observed on days 3 and 4. The reduction in withdrawal symptoms with BXCL501 numerically exceeded that observed with lofexidine 0.54 mg administered four times daily. BXCL501 demonstrated a favorable tolerability profile, with rates of key adverse events (including dizziness, orthostatic hypotension, bradycardia and insomnia) comparable to or lower than those reported for lofexidine in the Lucemyra ® (lofexidine) FDA label. This study was planned as a 4-arm trial: BXCL501 180 µg BID or 240 µg BID, placebo, and lofexidine 0.54 mg QID as a positive control. It enrolled participants who were predominantly exposed to fentanyl and included a high proportion of participants exposed to fentanyl adulterated or associated with xylazine (FAAX), which has been designated as an emerging threat by the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy. ​ Alcohol Use Disorder (“AUD”) with Comorbid Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (“PTSD”) ​ In December 2020, the Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System and Yale University Medical School were awarded a grant by the U.S. Department of Defense’s Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program with the overall objective to evaluate BXCL501 in patients who suffer from AUD with comorbid PTSD. The Company provided BXCL501 for the inpatient Alcohol Interaction Study, which has been completed. ​ Yale has received approval from the Institutional Review Board (“IRB”) and allowance from the FDA to proceed with a trial to evaluate the effects of up to 80 mcg BID of BXCL501 per day for 28 days on alcohol consumption, PTSD symptoms, cognitive function, memory, sleep, and mood in patients diagnosed with mild, moderate, or severe AUD and who meet Criterion A for comorbid PTSD. The outpatient study has received funding approval from the Pharmacotherapies for Alcohol and Substance Use Disorders Alliance (funded through a Cooperative Agreement between the U.S. Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program and RTI International). Patient screening and enrollment has begun, with the first patient expected to be dosed in the first half of 2026. Study results may be used to inform a Phase 3 study in patients diagnosed with PTSD intended to commence with support by the Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program. ​ Acute Stress Disorder (“ASD”) ​ On October 15, 2024, we announced a U.S. Department of War (DoW) grant to the University of North Carolina (“UNC”) to fund a study of BXCL501 for treating ASD. The award provides $2,800 to the UNC Institute for Trauma Recovery from September 15, 2024 through September 14, 2026 to evaluate the potential efficacy of BXCL501 to reduce acute stress reactions, also known as acute stress disorder (ASD), symptom severity and/or posttraumatic neuropsychiatric symptoms. The double-blind, placebo-controlled trial is expected to enroll 100 patients experiencing acute stress reactions resulting from motor vehicle collisions. On April 8, 2026, we announced the enrollment of the first patients in this DoW-funded Phase 2a clinical trial. The trial is being led by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Institute of Trauma Recovery and marks a significant milestone in the collaboration between BioXcel Therapeutics and UNC. As of July 28, 2026, the study enrolled 20 participants. The double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT06943404) is designed to enroll 100 patients experiencing ASRs following motor vehicle collisions and will evaluate the potential of BXCL501 to reduce ASR symptom severity, improve neurocognitive function, and prevent the progression to chronic posttraumatic neuropsychiatric symptoms. BioXcel Therapeutics is supplying BXCL501 for the trial. ASR symptoms occur in the days and weeks after trauma, and include anxiety, sleep disturbance, concentration difficulty, pain, and somatic symptoms such as dizziness and lightheadedness. Chronic adverse posttraumatic 44 Table of Contents neuropsychiatric symptoms occur when acute stress reactions do not resolve, and include persistent pain, posttraumatic stress, and depressive symptoms. ASRs are common among service men and women, police and other first responders, and survivors of shootings and natural disasters. ASRs affect more than 40 million Americans who seek emergency department care annually after traumatic stress exposure (e.g., motor vehicle collision) 1,2 BXCL502 Development We identified a second neuropsychiatric drug candidate, BXCL502 − Latrepirdine (Dimebon) − through our AI-based platform. We plan to evaluate BXCL502 initially as a monotherapy and possibly in combination with BXCL501 for the chronic treatment of agitation in patients with dementia and acute stress disorder. The active pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”) underlying BXCL502 affects serotonergic signaling in the brain. Our preclinical data suggests BXCL502 has the potential to treat stress-related neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia and other stress-related disorders. In previously published third-party clinical trial data, daily administration of the API of BXCL502 demonstrated improvement in behaviors using a well-established, clinically validated symptom scale. Formulation and further clinical development planning for BXCL502 was paused as part of the Clinical Reprioritization. Other Product Candidates Identified Leveraging our AI Platform Our AI platform is comprised of a series of customized and specific AI applications aimed at identifying, predicting efficacy and testing of late-stage assets with known mechanisms of action and associated pharmacology and safety data. We target neuropsychiatric and neurological rare disorders, where the compounds are either disease-modifying or symptom-mitigating. Compounds are tested in relevant models of disease and rank-ordered based on the potential to enter the clinic and ease of development. Disease areas of interest are stress related such as agitation, or neuropsychiatric symptoms associated with dementia and responsible for increased levels of healthcare burden. For example, our pipeline concepts BXCL503 and BXCL504 putatively have the potential to address apathy and aggression in dementia, respectively. These programs were also paused as part of the Clinical Reprioritization. Neuroscience Intellectual Property Our policy is to protect and enhance the proprietary technologies, inventions, and improvements that are commercially important to our business by filing patent applications in the U.S. and other jurisdictions related to our proprietary technology, inventions, improvements, and product candidates. We also rely on trademarks, trade secrets, and know-how relating to our proprietary technologies and product candidates, continuing innovation, and in-licensing technology and products. This reliance is expected to develop, maintain, and strengthen our proprietary position for novel therapeutics and novel formulations of existing therapeutics across multiple therapeutic areas. We also plan to rely on data exclusivity, market exclusivity, and patent term extensions when available. We have multiple patent families filed to protect our Neuroscience program, including BXCL501. As of August 3, 2026, our neuroscience patent portfolio included 13 U.S. utility applications, 17 issued U.S. utility patents, 41 pending non-U.S. utility applications, 29 allowed or granted non-U.S. patents (including five in Japan), one pending U.S. design patent application, and 2 registered design patents in Japan. Fourteen U.S. utility patents, directed to our proprietary sublingual film formulation of dexmedetomidine and methods of treating agitation, are listed in the FDA’s Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (commonly known as the “Orange Book”) for IGALMI ® with expiration dates between 2037 and 2043. In the formulation family, we have granted or allowed patents in China, Europe, Eurasia, Japan, Mexico, and the U.S., and pending applications in the U.S., China, and other major markets. We expect that patents issued in this family will expire no earlier than 2039. We have also filed applications in additional patent families that are relevant to BXCL501. We have one granted European patent and applications pending in the U.S. and Japan directed to methods of treating insomnia using sublingual dexmedetomidine. We expect that patents issued from these applications, will expire no earlier than 2035. We also have granted patents and pending applications filed in major markets, including the U.S., Europe, Japan, and China, directed to methods of treating agitation. We expect that patents issued from these applications, will expire between 2039 and 2043. In August 2024, the Company received a Notice of Allowance from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) for U.S. Patent Application No. 18/600,431 (the “’431 Application”). The ’431 Application claims methods of treating agitation using an oromucosal formulation of dexmedetomidine. The ‘431 Application issued as U.S. Patent 45 Table of Contents No. 12,138,247 (the ‘247 Patent) patent, issued on November 2024, and is expected to expire no earlier than January 12, 2043. The ’247 Patent is listed in the Orange Book for IGALMI ® . The term of individual patents depends upon the legal term for patents in the countries in which they are obtained. In most countries, including the U.S., the patent term is 20 years from the earliest filing date of a non-provisional patent application. Depending upon the timing, duration, and specifics of FDA approval of our product candidates, a U.S. patent that we own or license may be eligible for limited patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (a.k.a., the “Hatch-Waxman Act”). The act permits a patent restoration term of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during product development and the drug approval regulatory review process. However, patent term restoration cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the product’s approval date. The patent term restoration period is generally one-half the time between the effective date of an IND, and the submission date of a new drug application (“NDA”), plus the time between the submission date of an NDA and the approval of that application. Only one patent applicable to an approved drug is eligible for the extension, and the application for extension must be made prior to patent expiration. The USPTO, in consultation with the FDA, reviews and approves the application for any patent term extension or restoration. In the future, we intend to apply for restorations of patent term for some of our currently owned or licensed patents to add patent life beyond their current expiration date, depending on the expected length of clinical trials and other factors involved in the submission of the relevant NDA. ​ The term of a patent can also be extended by PTA established in 35 U.S.C. 154(b). The intention of the PTA is to accommodate for delays caused by the USPTO during the prosecution of a US utility or plant patent application. Under PTA, the USPTO delay is divided into three types: type A (delays after 14 months from the filing date of the application until the USPTO issues a first Office Action and delays after four months from the filing of certain actions by the applicant until the USPTO responds to such actions); type B (delays after three years from the earliest effective filing date until a patent is granted); and type C (delays due to interferences, secrecy orders, and successful appeals). The total amount of PTA is calculated by adding the types A, B, and C delays, and then subtracting any delay that is overlapped among three types or that is attributable to the applicant. ​ The term of a patent can also be shortened by a terminal disclaimer. A terminal disclaimer is a statement filed by a patent owner in which the owner disclaims or dedicates to the public the terminal part of the term of a patent. Often, the terminal disclaimer is filed in cases where at least one claim of a pending application would have been obvious in light of at least one claim in an earlier-filed patent, (or non-statutory obviousness-type double patenting rejection). The patent positions of companies such as ours are generally uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. No consistent policy regarding the scope of claims allowable in patents in the field of method of use patents or reformulation patents has emerged in the U.S. patent laws and their interpretation outside of the U.S. are also uncertain. Changes in either the patent laws or their interpretation in the U.S. and other countries may diminish our ability to protect our technology or product candidates and enforce the patent rights that we license, and also could affect the value of such intellectual property. In particular, our ability to stop third parties from making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing products that infringe our intellectual property will depend in part on our success in obtaining and enforcing patent claims that cover our technology, inventions, and improvements. With respect to both licensed and company owned intellectual property, we cannot guarantee that patents will be granted with respect to any of our pending patent applications or with respect to any patent applications we may file in the future, nor can we be sure that any patents that may be granted to us in the future will be commercially useful in protecting our products, the methods of use, or the manufacture of those products. In addition, if a pending patent application is granted, it is possible that only a subset of the claims that are currently contained in the pending patent application will be issued. Further, the coverage claimed in a patent application can be significantly reduced before the patent is issued, and its scope can be reinterpreted after issuance. Patent and other intellectual property rights in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space are evolving and involve many risks and uncertainties. For example, third parties may have blocking patents that could be used to prevent us from commercializing our product candidates and practicing our proprietary technology, and the issued patents that we in-license and those that may issue in the future may be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented, which could limit our ability to stop competitors from marketing related products or could limit the term of patent protection that otherwise may exist for our product candidates. In addition, the scope of the rights granted under any issued patents may not provide us with protection or competitive advantages 46 Table of Contents against competitors with similar technology. Furthermore, our competitors may independently develop similar technologies outside the scope of the rights granted under any issued patents that we own or exclusively in license. For these reasons, we may face competition with respect to our product candidates. Moreover, because of the extensive time required for development, testing, and regulatory review of a potential product, it is possible that, before any particular product candidate can be commercialized, any patent protection for such product may expire or remain in force for only a short period following commercialization, thereby reducing the commercial advantage the patent provides. For additional information regarding intellectual property regulations and risks, see below under “Immuno-Oncology Intellectual Property” and Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property” elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. ​ Immuno-Oncology On April 19, 2022, we announced the formation of a wholly owned subsidiary, OnkosXcel to develop potentially transformative medicines in oncology. OnkosXcel used proprietary AI capabilities to drive the capital-efficient development of innovative anti-cancer therapeutics. With the Company’s Clinical Reprioritization announcement on August 14, 2023, further work on the immuno-oncology programs was paused, except as noted below. BXCL701, an investigational, oral innate immune activator, demonstrated a 25% composite response rate in a Phase 2a clinical trial to treat patients with small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (“SCNC”) phenotype metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (“mCRPC”). On February 12, 2024, the Company received Fast Track development designation from the FDA for the investigation of BXCL701 in combination with a checkpoint inhibitor for the treatment of patients with metastatic SCNC with progression on chemotherapy and no evidence of microsatellite instability. A potential registrational trial design in mCRPC patients with SCNC phenotype was finalized, however in light of our Clinical Reprioritization, we have not met with the FDA to discuss this, nor plan to initiate this trial at the current time. Our Immuno-Oncology Programs Below is a summary of the status of our immuno-oncology clinical development programs as of the date of this Quarterly Report. We believe our product candidates, if successfully developed and approved, have the potential to become compelling treatment options for their respective indications. However, further work on our immuno-oncology programs has been paused, other than as noted below. ​ 47 Table of Contents BXCL701 as a Potential Treatment for Other Cancers In addition to its potential use in combination with CPIs to treat mCRPC, an immunologically cold tumor, we have been developing BXCL701 as a therapeutic for pancreatic cancer, and other solid tumors with greater, or “non-cold,” immunological activity that are nonetheless regarded as difficult-to-treat, and hematological malignancies. We believe the synergistic potential of BXCL701 and CPIs, when administered in combination, could increase cancer cell susceptibility to an enhanced immune response, potentially increasing the clinical benefit of CPIs, whose single-agent efficacy in treating these tumor types is generally viewed to be limited to between 13% and 30% of cancer patients and the duration of response to treatment is often short. As such, we envision the potential therapeutic benefit of BXCL701 increasing the sensitivity of cold tumors to CPI therapy, enabling the potential treatment of a range of cancers including pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and ovarian cancer, as well as enhancing the depth of response to CPIs in other cancers. In addition, based on the preclinical observation that BXCL701 showed direct cytotoxic activity against certain leukemic cells, we have initiated clinical development targeting relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (“AML”). Pancreatic Cancer Preclinical models demonstrated synergy between DPP inhibition with BXCL701 and anti-PD-1 antibody in the pancreatic cancer tumor microenvironment. Based on these preclinical observations, Georgetown Lombardi Cancer Center initiated a Phase 2 IST to assess the safety of BXCL701 when administered in combination with pembrolizumab (safety lead-in), as well as to estimate the 18-week progression-free survival rate (primary objective of the efficacy phase) in previously treated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The trial was expected to enroll approximately 39 patients in its efficacy phase in a Simon 2-stage single-arm, open-label design (19 patients in stage 1 and 20 patients in stage 2). Patients were monitored radiographically and by tumor markers for response assessment. Tumor biopsies and blood samples were collected over the course of treatment to better understand the potential mechanism of action for the combination. The human proof of concept portion of the trial started in the first half of 2024. Twenty-one patients were enrolled. Four out of 18 evaluable patients (22%) were alive and progression-free at 18 weeks. Three had partial responses (17%), and 4 had stable disease (22%), for a disease control rate of 39%. One responder had MSI-H PDAC (Microsatellite Instability High Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma), while the other 2 had MSS PDAC (Microsatellite Stable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma). Median PFS (Progression Free Survival) was 2.3 months (95% CI 1.58 – 5.29), and median overall survival was not reached (NR, 95% CI 4.54 - NR). No new safety signals were identified. BXCL701 plus pembrolizumab in second-line advanced PDAC did not reach the preliminary efficacy endpoint to trigger the second stage. However, there were encouraging signs: this combination induced objective responses in 2 MSS pts, and the PFS exceeded 6 months in 3 pts (14%). Ongoing correlative studies should help to examine the characteristics of responders vs. non-responders and elucidate predictive markers of efficacy and resistance to this novel immunotherapy combination. Relapsed or Refractory AML DPP8/9 inhibition has been shown to be cytotoxic to THP-1 cells, monocytic cancer cells cultured from a patient with AML, but not other cell lines, suggesting a specific vulnerability of AML to these inhibitors which we believe can be exploited for therapeutic benefit. Based on these preclinical observations, Dana-Farber initiated a Phase 1b trial to assess the safety of BXCL701 and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and RP2D of BXCL701 as a single agent administered on days 1-3, 8-10, 15-17 and 22-24 in a 4-week (28 days) cycle schedule. This trial started in the 48 Table of Contents first quarter of 2023. A total of 8 patients were treated on days 1-3, 8-10, 15-17 and 22-24 in a 4-week (28 days) cycle schedule across three cohorts as shown below: ● Cohort 1: 0.4 mg (BXCL701 0.2 mg BID); ● Cohort 2: 0.6 mg (BXCL701 0.3 mg BID); ● Final Cohort: 0.8 mg (BXCL701 0.4 mg BID) daily No DLTs were observed and the study was closed due to poor enrollment on 31 Aug 2025 with an incomplete final cohort. Pharmacokinetic analysis is underway to determine PK parameters associated with single agent dosing in AML patients using this novel dosing regimen. Immuno-Oncology Intellectual Property Intellectual property is of vital importance in our field and in biotechnology generally. We seek to protect and enhance proprietary technology, inventions, and improvements that are commercially important to the development of our business by seeking, maintaining, enforcing, and defending patent and other intellectual property rights, whether developed internally or licensed from third parties. We will also seek to rely on regulatory protection afforded through inclusion in expedited development and review, data exclusivity, market exclusivity, and patent term extensions where available. As of August 3, 2026, we have multiple patent families filed to protect our immuno-oncology program, including our core patent family directed to methods of using BXCL701 with immune checkpoint inhibitors, which is granted in the U.S., Japan, Australia, Canada, Russia, China, India, Taiwan, South Africa, and Mexico. Additional applications in this family are pending in major markets. Patents issued from this family are expected to expire no earlier than 2036. We have an additional patent issued in the U.S. directed to a method of selecting patients based on a biomarker and methods of treating certain cancers, with an expected expiration date no earlier than 2039. A corresponding European Patent case directed to selecting patients is issued and is expected to expire no earlier than 2038. Additional applications are directed to administering BXCL701 in certain dosing regimens. We expect that any patents issuing from these applications will expire no earlier than 2044. We expect to file additional patent applications in support of current and new immuno-oncology clinical candidates as well as new platform and core technologies. For additional information regarding intellectual property regulations and risks, see above under “Neuroscience Intellectual Property” and Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property” elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. ​ Basis of Presentation The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Components of Our Results of Operations Product Revenue, Net Revenue relates to sales of IGALMI ® and reflect limited market access since commercial launch in July 2022. The revenues are net of rebates, chargebacks, discounts, and other adjustments. During the fourth quarter of 2022, we began contracting directly with intermediaries such as GPOs. Operating Costs and Expenses Cost of Goods Sold Cost of goods sold primarily relates to the costs of producing, packaging, and delivering our product to customers, as well as costs related to excess or obsolete inventory. 49 Table of Contents Research and Development Our research and development expenses reflect costs associated with the identification of our preclinical and clinical product candidates. Expenditures primarily consist of salary, benefits and non-cash stock-based compensation for our research and development personnel, costs incurred under agreements with contract research organizations and sites that conduct our non-clinical studies and clinical trials, costs of outside consultants engaged in research and development activities, travel expenses, the cost of acquiring, developing and manufacturing preclinical and clinical trial materials and lab supplies, and depreciation and other expenses. Payments to BioXcel LLC are also included in research and development expenses. Costs associated with third parties that provide non-clinical services such as toxicology, pharmacology, research and discovery, biomarker studies and similar services are included in the professional fees category of research and development expenses. We expense research and development costs as incurred. Our research and development costs by program for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Three months ended ​ Six months ended ​ ​ June 30, ​ June 30, ​ ​ 2026 ​ 2025 ​ 2026 ​ 2025 Direct external costs ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ BXCL501 ​ $ 1,464 ​ $ 7,428 ​ $ 2,569 ​ $ 10,346 BXCL701 ​ ​ 12 ​ ​ 109 ​ 22 ​ ​ 61 Other research and development programs ​ ​ — ​ ​ 114 ​ 6 ​ ​ 232 Total direct external costs ​ $ 1,476 ​ $ 7,651 ​ $ 2,597 ​ $ 10,639 Internal personnel costs ​ ​ 1,455 ​ ​ 2,233 ​ ​ 2,999 ​ ​ 3,401 Sub-total direct costs ​ $ 2,931 ​ $ 9,884 ​ $ 5,596 ​ $ 14,040 Indirect costs and overhead ​ ​ 233 ​ ​ 372 ​ ​ 523 ​ ​ 770 Total research and development expenses ​ $ 3,164 ​ $ 10,256 ​ $ 6,119 ​ $ 14,810 ​ Selling, General and Administrative Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily consist of salaries, benefits and non-cash stock-based compensation for our sales, executive and administrative personnel. Selling, general and administrative expenses also include legal expenses to pursue patent protection of our intellectual property and other corporate matters, professional fees for audit and tax services and insurance charges. We may also incur increased costs to comply with corporate governance, internal controls, investor relations and disclosures and similar requirements applicable to public companies. As a result of our Clinical Reprioritization, we expect that our selling, general and administrative expenses will decline due to IGALMI ® ’s restructured commercialization plan and reduced personnel costs. However, we may also experience increased selling, general and administrative expenses due to higher fees for outside consultants, attorneys, and accountants. Restructuring Costs During both 2023 and 2024 the Company took multiple steps to reduce its headcount curtail expenses and focus on its clinical development efforts, collectively referred to as its Clinical Reprioritization. As an on-going part of the Clinical Reprioritization, on April 8, 2025, the Board unanimously approved (i) the payment of a retention bonus to all non-executive employees in the total aggregate amount of $1,522, to be paid in two equal installments and (ii) the issuance of 66 RSUs which fully vest on the one-year anniversary of the grant date. The first installment of the retention bonus was paid on April 30, 2025 and the second installment was paid on September 50 Table of Contents 30, 2025. Each such installment payment was subject to the applicable employee’s continued employment through December 31, 2025. On September 16, 2025, the Company dissolved its operations in the Czech Republic and paid $194 in closure related expenses during the third quarter of 2025. Other Expense (Income) Other (income) expense primarily consists of interest costs associated with the Credit Agreement the Company entered into in April 2022, changes in fair value of derivative financial instruments, and interest income earned on cash and cash equivalents that were comprised primarily of money market funds. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements A description of recently issued accounting pronouncements is set forth in Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. Results of Operations Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 Product Revenue, Net Commercial sales of IGALMI ® launched in July 2022. As part of the Company’s Clinical Reprioritization, the IGALMI ® commercial team shifted focus to a hospital/contracting strategy with a Corporate Account Director (“CAD”) team. The goal of the realigned CAD team is to work with large hospital/Integrated Delivery Network (“IDN”) and drive sales utilizing a top-down approach, allowing the Company to continue to make inroads into the institutional market in a more cost-efficient manner. IGALMI ® product revenue, net was $182 and $120 in the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The increase in sales was primarily the result of increased gross volume due to deeper GPO discounts that went into effect in the second quarter of 2025, as well as revenue generated from new contracts that commenced during the same period. Cost of Goods Sold Cost of goods sold for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, were $22 and $107, respectively. The decrease in Cost of goods sold for the three months ended June 30, 2026 is the result of lower charges for reserves for excess or obsolete inventory compared to the same period in 2025. Charges for reserves for excess or obsolete inventory were $0 and $95 in the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. Research and Development Expense Research and development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Three months ended ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ June 30, ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 2026 ​ ​ ​ 2025 ​ ​ ​ Change ​ % Change ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Personnel and related costs ​ $ 1,404 ​ $ 1,585 ​ $ (181) ​ ​ (11) % Non-cash stock-based compensation ​ 51 ​ 648 ​ (597) ​ ​ (92) % Professional fees ​ 501 ​ 1,007 ​ (506) ​ ​ (50) % Clinical trials expense ​ 334 ​ 6,119 ​ (5,785) ​ ​ (95) % Chemical, manufacturing and controls cost ​ 632 ​ 535 ​ 97 ​ ​ 18 % Other expenses ​ 242 ​ 362 ​ (120) ​ ​ (33) % Total research and development expenses ​ $ 3,164 ​ $ 10,256 ​ $ (7,092) ​ ​ (69) % 51 Table of Contents ​ The overall decrease of $7,092 for the three months ended June 30, 2026 relative to the same period in 2025 was primarily attributable to: ● Decreased clinical trials expense due to the completion of (i) the SERENITY At-Home pivotal Phase 3 safety trial in 2025 and (ii) the accompanying correlation study that compared caretaker agitation severity measurements to trained rater measurements in 2025. There were no studies initiated during the three months ended June 30, 2026. ● Decreased personnel and related costs as a result of lower headcount. ● Decreased non-cash stock compensation costs as a result of lower headcount. ● Decreased professional fees due to lower pharmacology costs, research and discovery costs, toxicology, and consulting costs. ● Increased chemistry, manufacturing and controls (“CMC”) costs primarily due to developmental activities to support the scale-up of the product for our outpatient indication. ● Decreased other expenses in conjunction with reduced clinical trial activity. Following IGALMI ® ’s approval by the FDA, we capitalize costs related to commercial production of IGALMI ® as inventory and expense those CMC costs related to clinical trials. Selling, General and Administrative Expense Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Three months ended ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ June 30, ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 2026 ​ ​ ​ 2025 ​ ​ ​ Change % Change ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Personnel and related costs ​ $ 1,182 ​ $ 1,031 ​ $ 151 ​ ​ 15 % Non-cash stock-based compensation ​ 307 ​ ​ 908 ​ (601) ​ ​ (66) % Professional fees ​ 4,868 ​ ​ 2,710 ​ 2,158 ​ ​ 80 % Commercial and marketing ​ ​ 52 ​ ​ 38 ​ ​ 14 ​ ​ 37 % Insurance ​ 299 ​ ​ 349 ​ (50) ​ ​ (14) % Other expenses ​ 481 ​ ​ 573 ​ (92) ​ ​ (16) % Total selling, general and administrative expenses ​ $ 7,189 ​ $ 5,609 ​ $ 1,580 ​ ​ 28 % ​ The overall increase of $1,580 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, relative to the same period in 2025 was primarily attributable to: ● Increased professional fees, primarily related to higher legal costs and consulting fees for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to 2025. ● Increased personnel and related costs as a result of three executive’s salaries being restored to 2024 amounts after their salaries had been reduced for 2025. ● Decreased non-cash stock compensation costs as a result of lower headcount and the Company’s lower stock price when awards were issued in 2025. 52 Table of Contents Other Expense (Income) Interest expense increased to $4,257 for the three months ended June 30, 2026 from $4,222 in the same period in 2025 primarily due to higher debt balances under the Credit Agreement. The expense was partially offset by lower interest income earned on lower levels of cash and cash equivalents that were held primarily in short-term money market funds. Interest income decreased to $131 for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to $230 for three months ended June 30, 2025, due to lower average cash balances during the year. Other (income) expense, net is primarily associated with changes in fair value of derivative financial instruments for the period, which relate to instruments associated with the Credit Agreement and the Company’s registered direct equity offerings. Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 Product Revenue, Net IGALMI ® product revenue, net was $388 and $288 in the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The increase in sales was primarily due to an increase in GPO discounts that went into effect in the second quarter of 2025, as well as revenue generated from new contracts that commenced during the same period. Cost of Goods Sold Cost of goods sold for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, were $305 and $121, respectively. Cost of goods sold is primarily related to the costs to produce, package and deliver IGALMI ® to customers, as well as costs related to excess or obsolete inventory. The increase in Cost of goods sold for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was primarily the result of the increase in inventory write-downs of $170 compared to the prior year. Research and Development Expense Research and development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Six months ended ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ June 30, ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 2026 ​ ​ ​ 2025 ​ ​ ​ Change % Change ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Personnel and related costs ​ $ 2,869 ​ $ 3,267 ​ $ (398) ​ ​ (12) % Non-cash stock-based compensation ​ 130 ​ 134 ​ (4) ​ ​ (3) % Professional fees ​ 1,043 ​ 1,786 ​ (743) ​ ​ (42) % Clinical trials expense ​ 717 ​ 8,137 ​ (7,420) ​ ​ (91) % Chemical, manufacturing and controls cost ​ 823 ​ 710 ​ 113 ​ ​ 16 % Other expenses ​ 537 ​ 776 ​ (239) ​ ​ (31) % Total research and development expenses ​ $ 6,119 ​ $ 14,810 ​ $ (8,691) ​ ​ (59) % ​ The overall decrease of $8,691 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 relative to the same period in 2025 was primarily attributable to: ● Decreased clinical trials expense due to the completion of (i) the SERENITY At-Home pivotal Phase 3 safety trial in 2025 and (ii) the accompanying correlation study that compared caretaker agitation severity measurements to trained rater measurements in 2025. There were no studies initiated during the six months ended June 30, 2026. ● Decreased personnel and related costs as a result of lower headcount in 2026 compared to 2025. ● Decreased professional fees due to lower pharmacology costs, research and discovery costs, toxicology, and consulting costs. ● Increased chemistry, manufacturing and controls (“CMC”) costs primarily due to developmental activities to support the scale-up of the product for our outpatient indication. 53 Table of Contents ● Decreased other expenses in conjunction with reduced clinical trial activity. Following IGALMI ® ’s approval by the FDA, we capitalize costs related to commercial production of IGALMI ® as inventory and expense those CMC costs related to clinical trials. Selling, General and Administrative Expense Selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Six months ended ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ June 30, ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 2026 ​ ​ ​ 2025 ​ ​ ​ Change % Change ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Personnel and related costs ​ $ 2,316 ​ $ 2,103 ​ $ 213 ​ ​ 10 % Non-cash stock-based compensation ​ 663 ​ ​ 1,602 ​ (939) ​ ​ (59) % Professional fees ​ 9,404 ​ ​ 5,582 ​ 3,822 ​ ​ 68 % Commercial and marketing ​ ​ 146 ​ ​ 207 ​ ​ (61) ​ ​ (29) % Insurance ​ ​ 834 ​ ​ 732 ​ ​ 102 ​ ​ 14 % Other expenses ​ 1,017 ​ ​ 1,082 ​ (65) ​ ​ (6) % Total selling, general and administrative expenses ​ $ 14,380 ​ $ 11,308 ​ $ 3,072 ​ ​ 27 % ​ The overall increase of $3,072 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, relative to the same period in 2025 was primarily attributable to: ● Increased professional fees, primarily related to higher legal costs and consulting fees for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to 2025. ● Increased personnel and related costs as a result of three executive’s salaries being restored to 2024 amounts after their salaries had been reduced for 2025. ● Decreased non-cash stock compensation costs as a result of lower headcount and the Company’s lower stock price when awards were issued in 2025. ● Decreased commercial and marketing expense. Other Expense (Income) Interest expense increased to $8,455 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $8,215 in the same period in 2025 primarily due to higher debt balances under the Credit Agreement. The expense was partially offset by lower interest income earned on lower levels of cash and cash equivalents that were held primarily in short-term money market funds. Interest income decreased to $342 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to $509 for six months ended June 30, 2025, due to lower average cash balances during the year. Other (income) expense, net is primarily associated with changes in fair value of derivative financial instruments for the period, which relate to instruments associated with the Credit Agreement and the Company’s registered direct equity offerings. Inflation Inflation generally affects us by increasing our cost of labor and clinical trial costs. We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our results of operations during the periods presented. For a discussion of inflationary risks to our future revenues under the Inflation Reduction Act, see “ Health care reform measures could hinder or prevent our product candidates’ commercial success. ” in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. Liquidity and Capital Resources As of June 30, 2026, we had cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of $13,801, negative working capital of $108,449 and stockholders’ deficit of $115,460. Net cash used in operating activities was $17,907 and $24,618 for the 54 Table of Contents six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. We incurred losses of approximately $27,404 and $26,441 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. We will need to generate significant product revenues to achieve profitability. Our history of significant losses, negative cash flows from operations, potential near-term increased covenant-driven amortization payments or full repayment obligations under our Credit Agreement, the regulatory event of default triggers under the Credit Agreement, other funding requirement covenants under the Credit Agreement, limited liquidity resources currently on hand, and dependence on our ability to obtain additional financing to fund our operations after the current resources are exhausted, about which there can be no certainty, have resulted in management’s assessment that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least 12 months from the issuance date of the financial statements included in this Quarterly Report. Management and the Company’s board of directors, with the assistance of advisors, have been actively pursuing a sale, merger, or other strategic transaction and additional financing alternatives, but to date these efforts have not resulted in a signed definitive agreement or committed source of additional capital. To date, we have continued research and development activities while managing our cash position. However, we require additional funding to continue as a going concern, and we have been unsuccessful to date in securing sufficient additional funding, notwithstanding an active process to identify and complete a sale, merger, financing or other strategic transaction. If we do not complete a strategic transaction, or do not receive sufficient financing from other sources of equity or debt financings, we may be required to file for protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Even if we are successful in raising additional capital, we will require substantial additional financing to service our debt facilities and achieve our goals and a failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed could force us to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or commercialization efforts. In connection with our efforts to pursue strategic alternatives, the Company is engaged in contingency planning in the event a strategic transaction acceptable to the Lenders is not completed on or prior to August 21, 2026, as required pursuant to the Twelfth Amendment to the Credit Agreement described below. The Company has not made any determination to commence a bankruptcy proceeding, and there can be no assurance as to which, if any, of these alternatives will be pursued or completed. Further, certain strategic alternatives will require the consent of our Lenders pursuant to the covenants in our Credit Agreement. See “Risks Related to Financial Position and Need for Additional Capital — We will need substantial additional funding, and if we are unable to raise capital when needed, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or commercialization efforts or otherwise seek strategic alternatives. ” in Part II. Item 1A., “Risk Factors” elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. Sources of Liquidity We have primarily focused our efforts on raising capital and building the products in our pipeline, and, although we generate revenue from sales of IGALMI ® , we do not expect to generate positive cash flows from operations in the near term. Since our inception, our operations have been financed primarily from proceeds from the sale of equity securities, including our initial public offering, private placements of our common stock, registered offerings of our common stock, an Equity Distribution Agreement with Canaccord Genuity LLC (“Canaccord”), and borrowings under our Credit Agreement (as described below). We have not yet established an ongoing source of revenue sufficient to cover our operating costs and will need to do so in future periods. Financing Agreements The Company maintains a senior secured credit facility (the “Credit Agreement”), as amended, with lenders (the “Lenders”) managed by Oaktree Fund Administration LLC (“OFA”), as administrative agent. The Lenders are comprised of affiliates of Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. The facility provides for term loans that are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and its guarantor subsidiaries, subject to customary exceptions. ​ As of June 30, 2026, borrowings under the Credit Agreement consisted of funded term loans, inclusive of previously capitalized interest and net of required principal repayments made to date. The loans are not revolving and no additional tranches remain available, as all undrawn commitments have expired. ​ The term loans bear interest at a fixed annual rate of 13.0%. Interest is payable quarterly in cash. The Company previously had the ability to elect PIK interest through June 30, 2025, which resulted in additional amounts being 55 Table of Contents capitalized as principal. Pursuant to the Tenth Amendment, the Company subsequently regained the ability to elect PIK interest only for the second quarter of 2026 and elected such treatment for interest accrued from April 1, 2026 through June 30, 2026, with the related amounts capitalized to principal. The blended effective interest rate as of June 30, 2026 was approximately 16.6%. ​ In addition to interest, the Credit Agreement includes customary fees, including prepayment premiums and amendment-related fees. There are no remaining commitment fees as all undrawn commitments have expired. An exit fee of 0.50% of the principal amount repaid is payable upon maturity or prepayment of the loans. The loans under the Credit Agreement do not amortize and mature on April 19, 2027. The Company may, at its option, no earlier than September 21, 2026 and no later than October 21, 2026, request an extension of the maturity date to April 19, 2028, provided that the Company satisfies certain conditions including receipt of certain regulatory and financial milestones. ​ The Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by BTI’s existing and subsequently acquired or organized subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions. BTI’s obligations under the Credit Agreement and the related guarantees thereunder are secured, subject to customary permitted liens and other agreed upon exceptions, by (i) a pledge of all of the equity interests of all of the Company’s existing and any future direct subsidiaries, and (ii) a perfected security interest in all of its and the guarantors’ tangible and intangible assets (except that the guarantees provided by the BXCL701 Subsidiaries are unsecured). ​ The Credit Agreement includes customary events of default, including payment defaults, covenant breaches, cross-defaults, bankruptcy-related events, and certain regulatory-related events. Upon an event of default, the lenders may accelerate the obligations and exercise remedies against the collateral. ​ The Credit Agreement contains, among other things, a covenant requiring that our audited annual financial statements included in our Annual Report be delivered without a “going concern” or like qualification or exception. ​ Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement On March 27, 2026, we entered into the Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement and Guaranty (the “Ninth Amendment”). Pursuant to the Ninth Amendment, the Lenders agreed to (i) waive the Credit Agreement’s covenant that the report and opinion the Company will receive from its independent registered public accounting firm with respect to the financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2025 will not contain a “going concern” or similar qualification, and (ii) reduce the Credit Agreement’s minimum liquidity covenant to require minimum cash liquidity of $12,500 from and after March 31, 2026 (instead of $15,000). ​ The Ninth Amendment’s effectiveness was subject to various customary conditions precedent, as well as conditions subsequent requiring the Company to: ​ ● on or before March 31, 2026, make a one-time prepayment of the principal amount of $2,500, together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon; ​ ● on April 15, 2026, grant new warrants to the Lenders to purchase 1,354 shares of common stock of the Company, at an exercise price of $0.01 per share (the “April 2026 Warrants”); and ​ ● in connection with the receipt by the Company of any gross cash proceeds from (i) the issuance of the Company’s common stock, warrants and/or pre-funded warrants, (ii) non-refundable cash consideration from partnering transactions entered into after the effective date of the fifth amendment to the Credit Agreement, (iii) the issuance of the Company’s subordinated debt and/or (iv) sales by the Company of its assets, in each case ((i) through (iv)), in transactions permitted under the Credit Agreement, make a prepayment of the loans under the Credit Agreement in an aggregate principal amount equal to 50% of such gross cash proceeds, together with accrued interest thereon and any fees or premia (including prepayment premium) payable in connection therewith; provided, that the foregoing requirement will not apply (A) with respect to the first $2,500 in the aggregate of proceeds raised from Capital Raise Activities (as defined in the Credit Agreement) and (B) once the aggregate principal amount of the Loans prepaid pursuant to one or more Capital Raise Prepayments equals $2,500. 56 Table of Contents ​ Tenth Amendment to Credit Agreement On July 3, 2026, the Company entered into the Tenth Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the “Tenth Amendment”) by and among the Company, as the borrower, the Lenders and OFA as administrative agent, which included (i) payment in kind of accrued and unpaid interest through and including June 30, 2026, by capitalizing and adding such interest to the outstanding principal amount of the Loans as of such date, (ii) defer the payment of principal that was originally due on June 30, 2026 until July 31, 2026, at which point the Company will be obligated to make a payment of $9,017 (constituting the principal and interest that were due and payable on June 30, 2026), plus all accrued interest and fees on such amount through and including July 31, 2026 and (iii) reduce the Credit Agreement’s minimum liquidity covenant to require minimum cash liquidity of $7,500 (instead of $12,500). In addition, pursuant to the Tenth Amendment: ● The Company is required to, on or prior to July 31, 2026, enter into definitive agreements with respect to one or more transactions acceptable to Lenders that (a) would result in the repayment of all loan and other obligations under the Credit Agreement or (b) is an alternative capital solutions transaction on terms and conditions acceptable to the Lenders. ● The Company agreed to permit any and all transfers or assignments of all or any portion of the loans, commitments, claims or other rights, interests or obligations of any Lender under or in respect of the Credit Agreement to any third party. In addition, the Company agreed to waive or otherwise release any and all restrictions contained in any contract between the Company and a third party on such third party’s ability to receive such assignments or transfers. ● The Company agreed to establish and maintain a strategic process committee of its board of directors, which committee shall be comprised solely of David Mack (and/or such other independent director acceptable to the Lenders and that is not a member of the Board as of the Tenth Amendment Effective Date), that will have the full and exclusive authority to evaluate, negotiate, oversee, coordinate and implement any sale, restructuring or other material transaction, including any equity raise, sale or business combination transaction, out-of-court restructuring, in-court restructuring, bankruptcy or insolvency filing or similar transaction and any other matters or actions as may be necessary or advisable to effectuate any of the foregoing. ● The Company agreed to certain additional reporting and information covenants, including a requirement to hold a weekly meeting with the Lenders and the Company’s financial advisors, and a requirement to deliver to the Lenders a 13-week cash flow budget and financial report on a bi-weekly basis. The Company will not be permitted to make disbursements for any two-week period in excess of 115% of the aggregate budgeted amount of disbursements for the applicable period. ● The Company agreed to certain additional negative covenants applicable following the Tenth Amendment Effective Date, which, among other things, prohibit the Company from, subject to limited exceptions, (i) making any dividend, distribution or repurchase with respect to its equity interests, (ii) making any investments, (iii) disposing of or granting any license in the Company’s assets, (iv) incurring or suffering to exist any indebtedness or liens, and (v) becoming party to or bound by, or canceling, terminating, modifying or amending in any material respect, or waiving any material rights under any material contract. ● Through July 31, 2026, the Company is prohibited from entering into, terminating, or otherwise modifying any compensation arrangement with its directors, officers or employees, or making any non-ordinary course payments to, or materially increasing the compensation or benefits of, such persons. ● The Company paid to the Lenders a fee equal to 100 basis points (or 1.00%) of the principal amount of the Loans outstanding as of the effective date of the Tenth Amendment, which was paid in kind by adding 57 Table of Contents such amount to the outstanding principal amount of the Loans on the effective date of the Tenth Amendment. Eleventh Amendment to Credit Agreement On July 31, 2026, the Company entered into the Eleventh Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the “Eleventh Amendment”), which amended the Credit Agreement. Pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment, the Lenders agreed to (i) defer the payment of principal that was originally due on June 30, 2026, which was previously deferred to July 31, 2026 pursuant to the Tenth Amendment, until August 31, 2026 at which point the Company is obligated to make a payment of $9,017 (constituting the principal and interest that were due and payable on June 30, 2026) plus all accrued interest and fees through August 31, 2026 and (ii) reduce the Credit Agreement’s minimum liquidity covenant to require minimum cash liquidity of $6,250 (instead of $7,500). In addition, pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment: ● The Company is required to, on or prior to August 10, 2026, enter into definitive agreements with respect to one or more transactions acceptable to Lenders that (a) would result in the repayment of all loan and other obligations under the Credit Agreement or (b) is an alternative capital solutions transaction on terms and conditions acceptable to the Lenders. ● Through August 10, 2026 (extended from July 31, 2026, as was provided under the Tenth Amendment), the Company is prohibited from entering into, terminating, or otherwise modifying any compensation arrangement with its directors, officers or employees, or making any non-ordinary course payments to, or materially increasing the compensation or benefits of, such persons. Twelfth Amendment to Credit Agreement On August 10, 2026, the Company entered into the Twelfth Amendment to Credit Agreement (the “Twelfth Amendment”), which amended the Credit Agreement. Pursuant to the Twelfth Amendment, the Company is required to, on or prior to August 21, 2026 (extended from August 10, 2026, as was required under the Eleventh Amendment), enter into definitive agreements with respect to one or more transactions acceptable to Lenders that (A) would result in the repayment of all loan and other obligations under the Credit Agreement or (B) is an alternative capital solutions transaction on terms and conditions acceptable to the Lenders. Pursuant to the Twelfth Amendment, the Lenders also agreed to reduce the Credit Agreement’s minimum liquidity covenant to require minimum cash liquidity of $3,000 (instead of $6,250, as under the Eleventh Amendment). ​ As of June 30, 2026, we had aggregate principal indebtedness of $107,152 outstanding under the Credit Agreement. ​ As of June 30, 2026, the Company was in compliance with all financial and restrictive covenants under the Credit Agreement. ​ March 2025 Registered Direct Offering ​ On March 3, 2025, we entered into a purchase agreement (the “March 2025 Offering”) pursuant to which we agreed to issue and sell an aggregate of (i) 188 shares of common stock at an offering price of $3.50 per Share, (ii) Pre-Funded Warrants to purchase up to 3,812 shares of common stock, at an offering price of $3.499 per share underlying the Pre-Funded Warrants, which equals the offering price per share less the $0.001 exercise price per share of the Pre-Funded Warrants, and (iii) an aggregate of 4,000 accompanying warrants (the “March 2025 Accompanying Warrants”) to purchase up to 4,000 shares of common stock at an offering price of $4.20 per accompanying warrant. The Pre-Funded Warrants have an exercise price per share of common stock equal to $0.001 per share. All 3,812 Pre-Funded Warrants were exercised and the same number of common stock were issued in exchange for $4 of proceeds during the year ended December 31, 2025. There were no warrant exercises for the three and six months ended March 31, 2026. For the year ended December 31, 2025, 2,300 of the March 2025 Accompanying Warrants were exercised and the same number of common stock were issued in exchange for $9,660 of proceeds. ​ 58 Table of Contents ATM Program - Canaccord In April 2025, we entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement with Canaccord to sell shares of our common stock, with aggregate gross sales proceeds of up to $8,135, from time to time, through an “at the market” equity offering program under which Canaccord will act as sales agent. In August 2025, we increased the maximum amount of shares that are eligible to be sold pursuant to the Equity Distribution Agreement to allow for the offer and sale of up to $3,500 of our common stock. In August 2025, we again increased the maximum amount of shares that are eligible to be sold pursuant to the Equity Distribution Agreement to allow for the offer and sale of up to $80,000 shares of common stock. For the three months ended June 30, 2026, we sold 2,706 shares for gross proceeds of $3,109 and received proceeds of $3,047, net of issuance costs of $62. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company sold 2,951 shares for gross proceeds of $3,607 and received proceeds of $3,535, net of issuance costs of $72. March 2026 Registered Direct Offering ​ On March 10, 2026, we entered into a purchase agreement (the “March 2026 Offering”) pursuant to which we agreed to issue and sell an aggregate of (i) 2,480 shares of common stock at an offering price of $1.739 per Share, (ii) Pre-Funded Warrants to purchase up to 2,020 shares of common stock, at an offering price of $1.738 per share underlying the Pre-Funded Warrants, which equals the offering price per share less the $0.001 exercise price per share of the Pre-Funded Warrants, and (iii) an aggregate of 4,500 accompanying warrants (the “March 2026 Accompanying Warrants”) to purchase up to 4,500 shares of common stock at an offering price of $1.614 per accompanying warrant. The Pre-Funded Warrants have an exercise price per share of common stock equal to $0.001 per share. During the three months ended March 31, 2026, all 2,020 Pre-Funded Warrants were exercised and the same number of common stock were issued in exchange for $2 of proceeds. There were no warrant exercises for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026. ​ Cash Flows ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Six months ended June 30, ​ ​ ​ ​ 2026 ​ ​ ​ 2025 Cash (used in) provided by: ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Operating activities ​ $ (17,907) ​ $ (24,618) Investing activities ​ $ — ​ $ — Financing activities ​ $ 2,951 ​ $ 13,339 ​ Operating Activities Net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $17,907 and was primarily attributable to our net loss of $27,404 and a $1,125 non-cash gain from the change in fair value of our derivative liabilities, offset by a $4,048 increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses, due to related parties, and other current liabilities, $3,409 in payable in kind interest on our credit agreement, $1,276 in accretion of debt discount and amortization of financing costs, and $793 in non-cash stock-based compensation, and a $639 decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets. Net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was $24,618 and was primarily attributable to our net loss of $26,441, a $7,222 increase in the change in the fair value of our derivative liability, in part offset by $5,433 in payable in kind interest on our credit agreement, $1,736 in non-cash stock-based compensation, $743 in accretion of debt discount and amortization of financing costs, and a $673 decrease in prepaid expenses, other current assets and other assets. Investing Activities Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 was $0 and $0, respectively. 59 Table of Contents Financing Activities Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2026, was $2,951 and was primarily attributable to net proceeds of $6,879 received from the March 2026 registered direct offering and net proceeds from the sale of common stock under the Equity Distribution Agreement with Canaccord of $3,535, offset by $8,412 in long-term debt principal repayments. Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2025, was $13,339 and was primarily attributable to net proceeds of $12,957 received from the March 2025 registered direct offering and net proceeds from the sale of common stock under the Equity Distribution Agreement with Canaccord of $135. Operating Capital and Capital Expenditure Requirements We expect to continue to incur significant and increasing operating losses at least for the next several years as we commercialize IGALMI ® and as we expand our clinical trials of and seek marketing approval focused on BXCL501 while pursuing development of additional product candidates for BXCL502, BXCL701 and BXCL702. We expect to continue to incur net losses in the near term. Our net losses may fluctuate significantly from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year, depending on the timing of our planned clinical trials and our expenditures on other research and development activities. We have based our projections of operating capital requirements on assumptions that may prove to be incorrect, and we may use all of our available capital resources sooner than we expect. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with research, development, and commercialization of pharmaceutical products, we are unable to estimate the exact amount of our operating capital requirements. We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially as we: ● initiate and continue our clinical development of our product candidates; ● conduct additional research and development with our product candidates; ● seek to identify, acquire, license, develop and commercialize product candidates; ● integrate acquired technologies into a comprehensive regulatory and product development strategy; ● maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio; ● hire scientific, clinical, quality control and administrative personnel and utilize professional services, including consultants, lawyers, and accountants; ● add operational, financial and management information systems and personnel, including personnel to support our drug development and commercial efforts; ● seek regulatory approvals for any product candidates that successfully complete clinical trials; ● fully develop a sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure and scale up external manufacturing capabilities to commercialize IGALMI ® and any product candidates for which we may obtain regulatory approval; and ● continue to operate as a public company. ​ We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash as of June 30, 2026 will not be sufficient to enable us to fund operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months from the date of the issuance of the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report, including funding our ongoing research and development and commercialization efforts. In particular, we believe that our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of $13,801 as of June 30, 2026 is not sufficient to fund our operations and meet our liquidity requirements through the end of August 2026. We expect that we will need to obtain substantial additional funding to fund our ongoing operations. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities, the ownership interests of our existing stockholders may be materially diluted, and the terms of these securities could include liquidation or other preferences that could adversely affect the rights of our existing stockholders. Under the terms of the Ninth Amendment, following receipt of aggregated gross proceeds from (a) the issuance of the Company’s common stock, warrants and/or pre-funded warrants, (b) non-refundable cash consideration from partnering transactions, (c) the issuance of the Company’s subordinated debt and/or (d) sales by the Company of its assets, in each case ((a) through (d)), in transactions permitted under the Credit Agreement (“Capital Raise Activities”), make a 60 Table of Contents prepayment of the loans under the Credit Agreement in an aggregate principal amount equal to 50% of such gross cash proceeds, together with accrued interest thereon and any fees or premia (including prepayment premium) payable in connection therewith; provided that such prepayment requirement shall not be applicable (A) with respect to the first $2,500 gross proceeds received from Capital Raise Activities and (B) once the aggregate principal amount of the prepaid pursuant to one or more of such prepayments equals $2,500. In addition, debt financing, if available, would result in increased fixed payment obligations and may involve agreements that include restrictive covenants that limit our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures, or declaring dividends, which could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business. Our failure to raise capital as and when needed would have a negative impact on our financial condition and our ability to pursue our business strategy. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we could be forced to significantly delay, scale back or discontinue the development or commercialization of our product candidates, seek collaborators at an earlier stage than otherwise would be desirable or on terms that are less favorable than might otherwise be available, and relinquish or license, potentially on unfavorable terms, our rights to our product candidates that we otherwise would seek to develop or commercialize ourselves. To date, we have continued research and development activities while managing our cash position. However, we can provide no assurance that will be successful in obtaining additional necessary resources and, if we are unable to fund our operations, including our clinical trials, we may need to focus on advancing fewer of our product candidates or otherwise consider strategic alternatives. ​ Due to the fact that we were unable to generate sufficient cash flows from operations or obtain sufficient funding to sustain operations and debt service obligations, management and our board of directors determined that it was in the best interests of the stockholders to seek strategic options. We hired advisors to explore strategic options, including, but not limited to, restructuring or refinancing our debt, seeking additional debt or equity capital investment, a sale or licensing transaction for of all or a portion of our assets, a combination of these, or other strategic transactions. We currently have no commitments to engage in any specific strategic transaction and there can be no assurance that we will be able to complete additional or alternative financings, business development transactions or other strategic alternatives. If we cannot continue as a viable entity, we may be required to seek relief under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. There can be no guarantees that if we file for bankruptcy we will emerge from bankruptcy as a going concern or that holders of our common stock will receive any recovery from any bankruptcy proceedings. ​ Contractual Obligations and Commitments In July 2024, the Company signed an amendment to its commercial supply agreement that requires minimum annual payments for the first five years of the agreement ending in 2026 that in aggregate total $10,000. The Company has met the minimum requirements for the first 4 years ending in 2025. The remaining minimum commitments for year 2026 is $2,000. In February 2022, we signed a distribution agreement with a third-party to distribute product related to BXCL501 in the U.S. The distributor will be paid defined fees for its services under the agreement, which can be terminated by either party for cause. The distribution agreement can also be terminated by us without cause, subject to payment of agreed upon termination fees. BTI leases office space for its corporate headquarters at 555 Long Wharf Drive, New Haven, Connecticut (the “HQ Lease”) under an operating lease that was set to expire in February 2026. The Company did not exercise the option to renew the HQ Lease for an additional five-year term. Prior to the expiration of the HQ Lease, on February 17, 2026, we agreed to amend the lease agreement to extend the lease on a month-to-month basis with a fixed monthly base rent payment of $33. For additional details, see Note 13, Leases in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report for additional information relating to the Company’s leases. In addition, we are obligated to make quarterly interest payments under our Credit Agreement. For additional details, see Note 9, Debt and Credit Facilities in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report for additional information relating to the Company’s debt payment obligations. 61 Table of Contents Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Our critical accounting policies and estimates are described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. We have reviewed and determined that those critical accounting policies and estimates remain our critical accounting policies and estimates as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2026. No material changes were made to our existing critical accounting policies and estimates during the period presented. Refer to Note 3, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk Not applicable. Item 4. Controls and Procedures Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively), evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2026. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2026, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended June 30, 2026 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. ​ 62 Table of Contents PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings From time to time, we may be subject to litigation and claims arising in the ordinary course of business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows or financial condition. Please refer to Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report for information regarding material legal proceedings. In addition, in February 2024, we became aware that the SEC had initiated a formal investigation involving the Company and certain of its directors and officers. This formal investigation relates to the Company’s public disclosures, including about product sales and the receipt of a Form 483 by an investigator at one of the Company’s clinical trial sites in the TRANQUILITY II study, and trading in the securities of the Company. We are cooperating fully with the investigation including producing documents, and current and former officers and employees of the Company have testified before the SEC. We cannot predict or determine whether any proceeding may be instituted by the SEC in connection with its investigation or the outcome of any proceeding that may be instituted, or the effects any such proceeding could have on the Company’s business or financing efforts. Item 1A. Risk Factors You should carefully consider the risks described below, as well as general economic and business risks and the other information in this Quarterly Report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. The occurrence of any of the events or circumstances described below or other adverse events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline. Additional risks or uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also harm our business. Risks Related to Financial Position and Need for Additional Capital We are substantially restricted in our corporate activities by our existing debt facilities and are considering all strategic alternatives. If we do not properly service and/or restructure our debt facilities or achieve an alternative strategic transaction, substantial doubt exists about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements are prepared using the generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. However, as shown in our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, and the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report, we have sustained substantial recurring losses from operations. In addition, we have used, rather than provided, cash in our continuing operations. As of June 30, 2026, we did not have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to fund operations and liquidity requirements through the end of August 2026. The above conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that our financial statements are issued. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue in existence. Uncertainty concerning our ability to continue as a going concern, among other factors, may hinder our ability to obtain future financing or execute a strategic transaction. Continued operations and our ability to continue as a going concern are dependent, among other factors, on our ability to develop and commercialize IGALMI ® and to obtain additional required funding in the near term and thereafter. Due to the fact that we were unable to generate sufficient cash flows from operations or obtain sufficient funding to sustain operations and debt service obligations, management and our board of directors determined that it was in the best interests of the stockholders to seek a strategic options. We hired advisors to explore strategic options, including, but not limited to, restructuring or refinancing our debt, seeking additional debt or equity capital investment, a sale or licensing transaction for of all or a portion of our assets, a combination of these, or other strategic transactions. We currently have no commitments to engage in any specific strategic transaction and there can be no assurance that we will be able to complete additional or alternative financings, business development transactions or other strategic 63 Table of Contents alternatives. If we cannot continue as a viable entity, we may be required to seek relief under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. There can be no guarantees that if we file for bankruptcy we will emerge from bankruptcy as a going concern or that holders of our common stock will receive any recovery from any bankruptcy proceedings. ​ If we do not complete a strategic transaction, or do not receive sufficient financing from other sources of equity or debt financings, we may be required to seek relief under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Even if we are successful in raising additional capital, we will require substantial additional financing to service our debt facilities and achieve our goals and a failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed could force us to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or commercialization efforts. If we do not complete a strategic transaction or receive sufficient financing from an equity or debt financing, we may be required to file for protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Even if we are successful in resolving our immediately liquidity needs, we believe that we will continue to expend substantial resources for the foreseeable future as we continue the development and commercialization of IGALMI ® , develop additional product candidates, if any, and launch clinical trials for such product candidates and pursue commercialization of product candidates, if approved. In addition, other unanticipated costs may arise. Because the outcome of our planned and anticipated clinical trials are highly uncertain, we cannot reasonably estimate the actual amounts necessary to successfully complete the development and commercialization of product candidates. Our costs will increase if we suffer any delays in our planned clinical trials for our current product candidates. We will need to raise additional funds to address our goals. Additional funds may not be available when we need them on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. We have identified conditions and events that raise substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. As of June 30, 2026, we had $13.8 million in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. Based on our existing cash, cash equivalents and lack of current availability under our funding facilities, we do not believe we have sufficient cash on hand to support current operations and service our debt obligations for at least one year from the date of issuance of the audited consolidated financial statements appearing in this in this Quarterly Report. This condition raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern for at least one year from the date that our financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 are issued. In order to mitigate liquidity issues, we have undertaken the Clinical Reprioritization and other restructuring actions, and may, among other things, seek to raise capital through the issuance of common stock, or by restructuring, refinancing, and/or amending the terms of the Credit Agreement (including with respect to regulatory related events of default that do not contain a cure period) or pursue other strategic alternatives. However, such transactions may not be successful and we may not be able to raise additional equity and/or financing necessary to meet our obligations. ​ The Twelfth Amendment to our Credit Agreement (as defined below) contains, among other things, a covenant requiring that , on or prior to August 21, 2026 (extended from August 10, 2026, as was required under the Eleventh Amendment), we enter into definitive agreements with respect to one or more transactions acceptable to Lenders that (A) would result in the repayment of all loan and other obligations under the Credit Agreement or (B) is an alternative capital solutions transaction on terms and conditions acceptable to the Lenders. We currently have no commitments to engage in any specific strategic transaction and there can be no assurance that we will be able to complete additional or alternative financings, business development transactions or other strategic alternatives to satisfy the requirements under the Twelfth Amendment’s covenant. ​ We have a limited operating history and have not generated substantial product revenues to date, which may make it difficult to evaluate the success of our business and to assess our future viability. We were incorporated in March 2017 and our operations to date have been largely focused on staffing our Company, raising capital, advancing the development of our product candidates, including conducting clinical and preclinical studies and establishing our commercial organization. We have only one product approved for commercial sale, and have limited experience in obtaining marketing approvals, manufacturing products on a commercial scale, and conducting sales and marketing activities necessary for successful commercialization. Consequently, predictions about 64 Table of Contents our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history or a history of successfully commercializing products. We expect our financial condition and operating results to continue to fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. We are focused primarily on research and development while continuing to support IGALMI ® commercial activities. We may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications and delays, and may not be successful in such a transition. We have incurred significant operating losses since inception and anticipate that we will continue to incur substantial operating losses for the foreseeable future and may never achieve or maintain profitability. Since our inception, we have incurred significant operating losses. Our net loss was $27.4 million and $26.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. As of June 30, 2026, we had a stockholders’ deficit of approximately $115.5 million. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and increasing operating losses for the foreseeable future. We have only one product candidate approved for marketing in the U.S., none in any other jurisdiction, and may never receive approval beyond the one product approved to date. It could be several years, if ever, before we have a commercialized product that generates significant revenues through sales of IGALMI ® or our product candidates, if approved. As a result, we are uncertain when or if we will achieve profitability and, if so, whether we will be able to sustain it. The net losses we incur may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year. We anticipate that our expenses may increase in the long term as we: ● evaluate the development of our product candidates; ● conduct preclinical studies and clinical trials for our current product candidates and any future product candidates that we may pursue; ● continue to develop, maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio; ● pursue regulatory approvals for our current and future product candidates that successfully complete clinical trials; ● develop an appropriate sales, marketing, and distribution infrastructure to commercialize IGALMI ® and any other product candidates for which we may obtain marketing approval; ● potentially hire additional clinical, commercial, regulatory, scientific and finance personnel; and ● incur additional legal, accounting and other expenses in operating as a public company. To become and remain profitable, we must develop and commercialize more products or product candidates with significant market potential. This will require us to be successful in a range of challenging activities, including completing clinical trials of our product candidates, developing commercial scale manufacturing processes, obtaining marketing approval, manufacturing, marketing, and selling IGALMI ® and any current and future product candidates for which we may obtain marketing approval, and satisfying any post-marketing requirements. We may never succeed in any or all of these activities and, even if we do, we may never generate sufficient revenue to achieve profitability. Although we have obtained U.S. FDA approval for IGALMI ® , because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with product development, we are unable to accurately predict the timing or amount of expenses or when, or if, we will obtain marketing approval to commercialize any additional product candidates. If we are required by the FDA, or other regulatory authorities such as the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) to perform studies and trials in addition to those currently expected, or if there are any delays in the development, or in the completion of any planned or future preclinical studies or clinical trials of our current or future product candidates, our expenses could increase and profitability could be further delayed. For example, developments with respect to our TRANQUILITY program evaluating BXCL501 in patients with dementia due to probable Alzheimer’s disease may increase the likelihood that we experience such costs or delays, as discussed in the risk factor below entitled: “ Developments relating to our TRANQUILITY II Phase 3 trial may impact the timing of our development plans for, and prospects for seeking or 65 Table of Contents obtaining regulatory approval of, BXCL501 for the acute treatment of agitation (non-daily) associated with dementia in patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease .” Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to become and remain profitable would decrease the value of our Company and could impair our ability to raise capital, maintain our research and development efforts, expand our business or continue our operations. A decline in the value of our Company also could cause you to lose all or part of your investment. We will need substantial additional funding, and if we are unable to raise capital when needed, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or commercialization efforts or otherwise seek strategic alternatives. We will require additional future funding to support current and anticipated future expenses. We currently anticipate continuing to develop and conduct clinical trials with respect to our current and any future product candidates; seek to identify and develop additional product candidates; acquire or in-license other product candidates or technologies; seek regulatory approvals for our product candidates that successfully complete clinical trials, if any; establish sales, marketing, distribution and other commercial infrastructure to support the commercialization of products for which we may obtain marketing approval; require the manufacture of larger quantities of product candidates for clinical development and, potentially, commercialization; maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio; hire and retain limited additional personnel, such as clinical, quality control and scientific personnel; add operational, financial and management information systems and personnel, including personnel to support our product development and help us comply with our obligations as a public company; and add equipment and physical infrastructure to support our research and development programs. We have been and may continue to be required to expend significant funds to continue to commercialize IGALMI ® in the U.S. and advance the development of BXCL501, BXCL701, BXCL502 and our other product candidates. In addition, while we may seek one or more collaborators for future development of our current product candidates or any future product candidates that we may develop for one or more indications, we may not be able to enter into a collaboration for any of our product candidates for such indications on suitable terms, on a timely basis or at all. In any event, our existing cash will not be sufficient to fund all of the efforts that we plan to undertake or to fund the completion of development of our product candidates or our other preclinical programs. Accordingly, we will be required to obtain further funding through public or private equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations and licensing arrangements or other sources. We may also seek third-party investments in or other strategic options for our subsidiary, OnkosXcel. Further financing may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, we are reliant on the financial institutions with which we hold our cash and cash equivalents. If such institutions were to close, we may not be able to recover all of our cash or cash equivalents held at such institutions. Moreover, market volatility, credit crises, adverse macroeconomic conditions, such as high interest or inflation rates, or other factors, as well as Company-specific factors such as the progress of our development pipeline, adverse clinical events or results, regulatory investigations, or ongoing or potential legal proceedings, could also adversely impact our ability to access capital as and when needed. Our failure to raise capital as and when needed would have a negative impact on our financial condition and our ability to pursue our business strategy. Management believes that the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of $13.8 million as of June 30, 2026, will allow the Company to fund its operations and meet its liquidity requirements through the end of August 2026. There can be no assurance that we will be able to extend our cash runway. Furthermore, our estimate as to how long we expect our existing cash to be able to continue to fund our operations is based on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could use our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Further, changing circumstances, some of which may be beyond our control, could cause us to 66 Table of Contents consume capital significantly faster than we currently anticipate, and we may need to seek additional funds sooner than planned. Our future funding requirements, both short-term and long-term, will depend on many factors, including: ● the scope, progress, timing, costs, and results of clinical trials of our product candidates, including any delays that have occurred or may occur due to the recent developments with the TRANQUILITY program; ● our ability to enter into and the terms and timing of any collaborations, licensing agreements or other arrangements; ● the costs, timing and outcome of seeking regulatory approvals; ● the costs of commercialization activities for IGALMI ® and for any of our product candidates that receive marketing approval, to the extent such costs are not the responsibility of any future collaborators, including the costs and timing of establishing product sales, marketing, distribution and manufacturing capabilities; ● revenue received from commercial sales of IGALMI ® and our current and future product candidates; ● the costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications, maintaining and protecting our intellectual property rights and defending against intellectual property related claims; ● the number of future product candidates that we pursue and their development requirements; ● changes in regulatory policies or laws that may affect our operations; ● changes in physician acceptance or medical society recommendations that may affect commercial efforts; ● the costs of acquiring potential new product candidates or technology; ● the costs of operating as a public company; ● the extent to which our operations continue; ● the costs of legal proceedings and investigations; and ● costs associated with any adverse market conditions or other macroeconomic factors. As we continue our research and development activities, we will require additional resources to continue as a going concern. We can provide no assurance that we will successfully obtain additional resources to improve our financial condition. If we are unable to obtain necessary additional capital, we could be compelled to pursue alternative options, including, without limitation, implementing further workforce reductions, reducing or ceasing product development programs and advancement of our clinical trials and product candidates, selling our assets or seeking other strategic alternatives. Our board of directors is evaluating a range of strategic options to maximize shareholder value and advance the commercial and development plans for IGALMI, which may include, but are not limited to, a sale of the Company, a merger or other business combination, a collaboration, joint venture, royalty or license agreement of all or a portion of our assets, a recapitalization or other financing transaction, or continued execution of our standalone operating plan. We have not made a decision to pursue any specific transaction or strategic option, no set timetable has been established for the completion of this process, and there can be no assurance that the process will result in any transaction or other particular outcome. The process itself may be costly and time-consuming, may divert the attention of our management and the board of directors, may create uncertainty for our employees, collaborators and counterparties, and may cause volatility in the trading price of our common stock. Further, if we seek relief under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, there can be no guarantees that we will emerge from bankruptcy as a going concern or that holders of our common stock will receive any recovery from any bankruptcy proceedings. ​ 67 Table of Contents We have significant indebtedness and other contractual obligations that could impair our liquidity, restrict our ability to do business and thereby harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. We may not have sufficient cash flow from operations to satisfy our obligations under the Credit Agreement. As of June 30, 2026, we had aggregate principal indebtedness of $107.2 million outstanding under our Credit Agreement and Guaranty (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”) by and among the Company, as the borrower, certain subsidiaries of the Company from time to time party thereto as subsidiary guarantors, the lenders party thereto (the “Lenders”), and Oaktree Fund Administration LLC (“OFA”) as administrative agent. Restrictive covenants in the Credit Agreement place limits on our ability to conduct our business. The Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties and customary affirmative and negative covenants, including, among other things, restrictions on indebtedness, liens, investments, mergers, dispositions, prepayment of other indebtedness, and dividends and other distributions, subject to certain exceptions, including specific exceptions with respect to product commercialization and development activities. In addition, certain events, including receipt of a warning letter from the FDA, may constitute an event of default. We must also comply with certain covenants under the Credit Agreement, including a financial covenant that requires we maintain certain minimum cash liquidity amounts. In addition, certain events, including certain regulatory events and any “going concern” or similar qualification in a report of the Company’s independent registered public accountants relating to the Company’s annual financial statements (except for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2024 and 2025, which have been waived by the Lenders), constitute an event of default under the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement also includes other covenants relating to certain change of control events can also trigger an event of default under the Credit Agreement, including control by any entity or group of entities, other than BioXcel LLC and its affiliates, that acquires 35% or more of our voting capital stock. The Credit Agreement also contains a minimum liquidity covenant that, as of September 30, 2025, requires us to maintain at all times at least $15.0 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, which was reduced to $12.5 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents in the Ninth Amendment. Additionally, pursuant to the Fifth Amendment to our Credit Agreement, we are required to make quarterly amortization payments equal to 5.0% of the principal amount outstanding under the Credit Agreement, together with applicable prepayment fees, beginning on March 31, 2026. These covenants may limit our flexibility in operating our business and our ability to take actions that might be advantageous to us and our shareholders. Our ability to make scheduled payments or payments to maintain compliance with covenants or to restructure or refinance these and other outstanding debt obligations depends on our financial and operating performance, including growth in revenue from IGALMI ® and BXCL501, which will be affected by prevailing economic, industry and competitive conditions and by financial, business and other factors beyond our control. A failure to pay our debt, fixed costs and other obligations or a breach of our contractual obligations or other event of default could result in a variety of adverse consequences, including the acceleration of our obligations or the exercise of remedies by our creditors and lessors or otherwise exercise the rights of a secured creditor. In such a situation, it is unlikely that we would be able to cure our breach, fulfill our obligations, make required payments or otherwise cover our fixed costs, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, historically we have relied on debt and equity financings as our primary sources of liquidity. If our future cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay expenditures, sell assets, seek additional capital or seek to restructure or refinance our indebtedness. Additionally, under the terms of the Ninth Amendment, following receipt of aggregated gross proceeds from Capital Raise Activities, we have agreed to make a prepayment of the loans under the Credit Agreement in an aggregate principal amount equal to 50% of such gross cash proceeds, together with accrued interest thereon and any fees or premia (including prepayment premium) payable in connection therewith; provided that such prepayment requirement shall not be applicable (A) with respect to the first $2.5 million gross proceeds received from Capital Raise Activities and (B) once the aggregate principal amount of the prepaid pursuant to one or more of such prepayments equals $2.5 million. As a result, only a portion of the gross proceeds of Capital Raise Activities will be available to fund our operations, which may force us to raise additional capital sooner and on less favorable terms and may make it more difficult to maintain compliance with our minimum liquidity covenant. Any refinancing or restructuring of our indebtedness could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants. These 68 Table of Contents alternative measures may not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled or any accelerated debt service obligations. In the absence of such cash flows and resources, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to sell material assets or pursue other strategic alternatives to attempt to meet our debt service obligations. ​ Our Clinical Reprioritization and other workforce reductions may not achieve our intended outcome. ​ In August 2023, we announced a broad-based strategic clinical reprioritization (the “Clinical Reprioritization”) and have taken further restructuring actions since then. As part of these efforts, we have taken actions to reduce certain operational and workforce expenses that are no longer deemed core to our ongoing operations in order to extend our cash runway and drive innovation and growth in high potential clinical development and value creating opportunities. These actions include a shift in commercial strategy for IGALMI ® in the institutional setting, a reduction of in-hospital commercialization expenses, a suspension of programs no longer determined to be core to ongoing operations, and a prioritization on at-home treatment setting opportunities for BXCL501. As part of this strategy, we reduced our workforce in 2023 by approximately 60%. ​ In May and September 2024, we initiated further workforce reductions, and we may undertake further similar cost-saving initiatives, which may include additional restructuring or workforce reductions. These types of cost-reduction activities can be complex and result in unintended consequences and costs, including decreased employee morale, loss of institutional knowledge and expertise and adversely impact our business. We completed these additional restructuring actions to further reduce the workforce by 50%, ending the year ended December 31, 2024 with 37 full-time employees. ​ The reduction in force may result in unintended consequences and costs, such as the loss of institutional knowledge and expertise, attrition beyond the intended number of employees, decreased morale among our remaining employees, and the risk that we may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the reduction in force. In addition, while positions have been eliminated, certain functions necessary to our operations remain, and we may be unsuccessful in distributing the duties and obligations of departed employees among our remaining employees. The reduction in workforce could also make it difficult for us to pursue, or prevent us from pursuing, new opportunities and initiatives due to insufficient personnel, or require us to incur additional and unanticipated costs to hire new personnel to pursue such opportunities or initiatives. The workforce reduction could also harm our reputation, making our ability to recruit skilled personnel difficult. If we are unable to realize the anticipated benefits from the reduction in force, or if we experience significant adverse consequences from the reduction in force, our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be materially adversely affected. ​ In addition, we may not realize the benefits of or there may be unanticipated costs associated with our Clinical Reprioritization. As a result of the Clinical Reprioritization, including our strategic refocus, we may not generate material revenues from IGALMI ® in the near term because our commercial force will be significantly reduced. If we are unable to commercialize IGALMI ® in a different setting or unable to develop, receive marketing approval for and successfully commercialize BXCL501, BXCL701 and any of our other product candidates on our own or with any future collaborator, or experience delays because of any of these factors or otherwise, our business could be materially and substantially harmed. ​ In addition, because we have limited financial and managerial resources, under our Clinical Reprioritization, we intend to focus on specific product candidates, indications and development programs. We may also conduct several clinical trials for our product candidates in parallel over the next several years, which may make our decision as to which product candidates to focus on more difficult. As a result, we may forgo or delay pursuit of opportunities with other product candidates or other indications that could have had greater commercial potential or likelihood of success. Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities. Our spending on current and future research and development programs and product candidates for specific indications may not yield any commercially viable products. If we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a particular product candidate, we may relinquish valuable rights to that product candidate through future collaborations, licenses and other similar arrangements in cases in which it would have been more advantageous for us to retain sole development and commercialization rights to such product candidate. If we are not successful in increasing our efficiency as a result of this Clinical Reprioritization, our efforts to develop and 69 Table of Contents commercialize our product candidates may be delayed or halted and our business could be materially adversely impacted. ​ Risks Related to the Discovery and Development of Product Candidates We have limited experience in drug discovery and drug development. Prior to the acquisition of our product and product candidates, we were not involved in and had no control over their preclinical and clinical development. In addition, we are relying upon the parties we acquired our product candidates from to have conducted research and development in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal, regulatory and scientific standards, accurately reported the results of all clinical trials conducted prior to our acquisition of the applicable product candidate, and correctly collected and interpreted the data from these studies and trials. To the extent any of these activities did not occur, our expected development time and costs could increase, which could adversely affect our prospects for marketing approval of, and receiving any future revenue from, these product candidates. Developments relating to our TRANQUILITY II Phase 3 trial may impact the timing of our development plans for, and prospects for seeking or obtaining regulatory approval of, BXCL501 for the acute treatment of agitation (non-daily) associated with dementia in patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease. Following our discovery of principal investigator misconduct at one of the clinical sites in our TRANQUILITY II Phase 3 clinical trial, we initiated an investigation into the issues associated with the trial. This principal investigator had previously been subject to a December 2022 FDA inspection of her clinical site in connection with the TRANQUILITY II clinical trial. At the conclusion of this inspection, the FDA issued an FDA Form-483 identifying three inspectional observations. These observations related to the principal investigator’s failure to adhere to the informed consent form approved by the Institutional Review Board for a limited number of subjects whose records the FDA reviewed, maintain adequate case histories for certain patients whose records the FDA reviewed, and adhere to the investigational plan in certain instances. For example, the FDA cited the principal investigator’s delay in informing the sponsor’s medical monitor or pharmacovigilance safety vendor of an SAE, for one of the subjects, which report was made to our vendor outside of the 24 hour time period prescribed by the clinical trial protocol. The principal investigator for this clinical site responded to the FDA observations within the time period requested. The FDA concluded that the inspection of a single site in its TRANQUILITY II Phase 3 trial is closed under 21 C.F.R.20.64(d)(3) and released the Establishment Inspection Report. The FDA has designated “Voluntary Action Indicated” for the site, which means objectionable conditions or practices were found without significant public health risks, but the agency is not prepared to take or recommend any administrative or regulatory action. In May 2023, it came to our attention that this same principal investigator in the TRANQUILITY II clinical trial may have fabricated email correspondence around the time of the FDA inspection, purporting to demonstrate that the investigator timely submitted to our pharmacovigilance safety vendor a report of an SAE from a different subject than the one cited in the FDA Form-483, and purporting to show that the vendor had confirmed receipt. Upon receipt of this information, we promptly initiated an investigation and received confirmation that the principal investigator fabricated the email correspondence related to the timing of the reporting of this SAE to our pharmacovigilance vendor to make it appear as though this SAE had been timely reported as required by the clinical trial protocol. This principal investigator has not participated in any other clinical trial sponsored or conducted by us. Both we and the principal investigator’s employer have reported this incident to the FDA. Since that time, we have taken steps to further investigate and evaluate the conduct of the TRANQUILITY II trial at this clinical site. Based on these steps to date, we believe that there have been no further instances of misconduct or fraud or other findings that adversely impact the data integrity or reliability of the eligibility, safety, and efficacy data obtained at the clinical trial site in question. The primary efficacy endpoint in TRANQUILITY II was the change in PEC score, which is a measurement of agitation severity captured by trained raters during an agitation episode. While change in PEC score has been used to support the approval of IGALMI ® for the acute treatment of agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar I or II disorder in adults, it has not been used as a primary endpoint to support the approval of a drug candidate for the 70 Table of Contents treatment of agitation associated with Alzheimer’s Disease. Prior to initiating our TRANQUILITY II trial, we believe we reached alignment with FDA regarding the use of PEC scores as a primary endpoint to assess individual agitation episodes in dementia patients. In the normal course, we have been in communication with the FDA regarding the data and information needed to further support the consistency of the measurement of PEC ratings, and we believe that we have generated sufficient data to demonstrate such consistency. Following submission of certain data on PEC score from a separate study of raters assessing video vignettes, the FDA expressed certain concerns with respect to the reliability of PEC scores in that study. The FDA has requested that we provide additional information to support the consistency of the measurement of PEC ratings to assess the treatment of agitation associated with Alzheimer’s Disease. While we believe that we have generated sufficient data to demonstrate such consistency, and we plan to submit these data and analyses to the FDA, if the FDA disagrees, it may require that we provide more information to demonstrate reliability in the measurement of PEC scores and/or may require that we generate additional data to support the reliability of PEC score measurements in our TRANQUILITY II trial. There can be no assurances that any information or data we provide to FDA will sufficiently demonstrate the consistency and reliability of the PEC-score data from our TRANQUILITY II trial, or that our PEC-score data will not represent a potential review issue in connection with any application we may submit to FDA. In addition, we are continuing to seek feedback from the FDA with respect to our TRANQUILITY program. For example, on February 20, 2024, we held a Type B/Breakthrough Therapy designation meeting with the FDA. The original purpose of this meeting was to obtain feedback on the design of a proposed at-home study that did not include caregiver-collected efficacy endpoints, based on our belief that obtaining caregiver assessments of efficacy would be challenging. We believe there are no validated caregiver endpoints for assessing efficacy in Alzheimer’s disease patients in the at-home setting. As a result, we focused on requesting feedback from the FDA regarding our proposal for an at-home clinical study with safety as the primary objective, and to better understand what additional data would be required to submit an sNDA to support labeling for BXCL501 to include the acute treatment of agitation associated with dementia in probable Alzheimer’s disease or, in the alternative, in this population in the care setting only. In its preliminary responses, the FDA reiterated its prior comments that we generate additional efficacy data, including repeat-dose efficacy data, to support an sNDA submission, as the FDA indicated that our proposed efficacy database, which currently includes the 70 patients who have been treated with 60 mcg of BXCL501 in TRANQUILITY I and TRANQUILITY II, would not contain substantial evidence of effectiveness absent additional data. The FDA advised that we generate the necessary efficacy data in care facilities prior to conducting any trials in the at-home setting. In addition, the FDA indicated the need to generate long-term safety data to support an sNDA submission, including from probable Alzheimer’s disease patients exposed to BXCL501, for up to one year. We have received the final meeting minutes from the FDA, which we believe are consistent with the FDA’s preliminary responses and the subsequent meeting discussion. Based on the FDA’s feedback, we are currently planning to generate additional Phase 3 efficacy and safety data, in a variety of relevant care-facility settings and across severity of dementia, including through, among other things, conducting our planned TRANQULITY In-Care Phase 3 trial. In addition, we plan to discuss the details of the requirement for long-term safety data at a future meeting with the FDA. Also, although we announced in November 2023 that we were planning to conduct a Phase 3 trial in the at-home setting, with safety as the primary objective (TRANQUILITY At Home), given the priority to expand the database to generate additional efficacy and safety data in care facilities, we are re-evaluating the timing for initiating TRANQUILITY At Home. Conducting any new clinical trial can take significant time, funding and resources, and there are no assurances we could raise sufficient capital or have the liquidity and resources to conduct further clinical trials in our TRANQUILITY program, including our planned TRANQUILITY In-Care Trial. Any new clinical trials conducted in our target patient populations may have different safety or efficacy results from the topline data the Company previously announced for the TRANQUILITY II clinical trial. Further, any government investigation, disqualification, or debarment of, or proceeding or action against the principal investigator, or any government investigation, proceeding or action against us, could further delay development and approval of BXCL501 for this indication, and otherwise have a material adverse effect on us, our financial condition (including triggering a potential event of default under our Credit Agreement), results of operations and prospects. 71 Table of Contents We have limited clinical data supporting potential safety or efficacy of BXCL501 for use in the at-home setting in the acute treatment of agitation in patients with dementia due to probable Alzheimer’s disease and patients with schizophrenia and bipolar patients. In August 2023, we announced our intention to pursue the Clinical Reprioritization, including among other things, a shift in focus to primarily develop BXCL501 for use in expanded settings, including the at-home setting and care facilities, for the acute treatment of agitation in patients with dementia due to probable Alzheimer’s disease and the acute treatment of agitation in schizophrenia and bipolar patients in the at-home setting. Although we have conducted several clinical trials that evaluated BXCL501 in the institutional setting, and we have conducted the SERENITY At-Home Phase 3 trial evaluating the safety of BXCL501 for the acute treatment of agitation associated with bipolar disorders or schizophrenia in the at-home setting, we have not conducted a clinical trial evaluating the at-home use of BXCL501 in the acute treatment of agitation in patients with dementia due to probable Alzheimer’s disease. Although we intend to seek additional feedback from the FDA regarding the potential of our ongoing or completed clinical trials to support submission of one or more sNDAs and to support a label for use in the home setting for in patients with dementia due to probable Alzheimer’s disease, it is possible that the FDA may not consider our available data adequate to support such submissions. On January 14, 2026, we submitted a supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) to the FDA for IGALMI ® for the acute treatment of agitation associated with schizophrenia and bipolar disorders in the at-home setting. This sNDA seeks to expand IGALMI ® ’s label to include the broader at-home patient population where there are no FDA-approved options currently available. Although we announced on August 18, 2025 that we had received positive pre-sNDA meeting responses from the FDA and believe that the planned sNDA regulatory package will be sufficient to support the sNDA submission, there are no assurance that the FDA will accept the submission and it is possible that the FDA may not consider our available data adequate to support the submission. Further, even if the FDA accepts the sNDA submission, there is no assurance that the FDA will approve our sNDA and authorize an expanded IGALMI ® ’s label to include the broader at-home patient population. For example, on October 11, 2023, we received feedback from the FDA that TRANQUILITY I and TRANQUILITY II alone are not sufficient to support an sNDA submission for the use of BXCL501 to treat acute agitation (non-daily) in patients with dementia due to probable Alzheimer’s disease in either the at-home setting or care facilities, and the FDA indicated that we should, among other things, conduct a further clinical trial to evaluate safety and collect efficacy data of BXCL501 before we are able to submit an sNDA seeking approval of BXCL501 for use in such populations. For a description of recent developments relating to our TRANQUILITY program, please see the prior risk factor, “ Developments relating to our TRANQUILITY II Phase 3 trial may impact the timing of our development plans for, and prospects for seeking or obtaining regulatory approval of, BXCL501 for the acute treatment of agitation (non-daily) associated with dementia in patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease. ” We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to seek or obtain approval of BXCL501 for treatment of agitation in patients with dementia due to probable Alzheimer’s disease in the at-home setting based on this updated development plan. Although we continue to seek feedback from the FDA with respect to our TRANQUILITY program, the FDA may not agree that any trial designs we propose are sufficient to establish both the safety and efficacy of BXCL501 for the acute treatment of agitation associated with dementia due to probable Alzheimer’s disease in either a care setting or an at-home setting. For example, to assess safety, the FDA has indicated that we need to expose more patients to BXCL501 for a longer period of time and that an efficacy trial of a shorter duration, combined with the patients in its previous trials, would not support submissions of an sNDA. Further, to assess efficacy in the home setting, the FDA may determine that we cannot rely on our previous studies of BXCL501 for this proposed indication since those studies were conducted in assisted living facilities and they are not comparable to the at-home setting. The FDA may also require us to seek approval for BXCL501 for use in care facilities prior to seeking any approval for at-home use in the targeted AD patient population. In particular, we are planning to generate additional Phase 3 safety and efficacy data in a variety of relevant care-facility settings, but even if our planned clinical efforts are successful and even if we are able to obtain approval of BXCL501 for use in patients with dementia due to probable Alzheimer's disease, we cannot provide assurance that we will be able to seek or obtain approval of BXCL501 for the treatment of agitation in patients with dementia due to probable Alzheimer’s disease in the at-home setting based on this data and we will be required to generate additional data to evaluate the at-home use of BXCL501 in our targeted Alzheimer's dementia population 72 Table of Contents before we are able to seek approval for such at-home use in this population, if ever. In addition, the FDA may determine that we cannot rely on the data from our prior TRANQUILITY II Phase 3 trial to support an sNDA as a result of potential data integrity issues at the trial site, as the FDA may not agree with our belief that data reliability and integrity remain intact. See Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Discovery and Development of Product Candidates— Developments relating to its TRANQUILITY II Phase 3 trial may impact the timing of its development plans for, and prospects for seeking or obtaining regulatory approval of, BXCL501 for the acute treatment of agitation (non-daily) associated with dementia in patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease ” for additional information. If the FDA does not accept the data from our prior TRANQUILITY II Phase 3 trial, we could be required to conduct additional clinical trials beyond those we currently contemplate, which would increase our costs and delay potential submission of an sNDA for BXCL501 which in turn would adversely affect our financial position and operations. Accordingly, if the FDA reaches these conclusions or otherwise finds that our proposed clinical studies would not adequately evaluate the safety and efficacy of BXCL501 for the acute treatment of agitation associated with dementia due to probable Alzheimer’s disease in an at-home setting and/or care setting, we may need to evaluate more patients for a longer period of time to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of BXCL501. With respect to our SERENITY program, we also held a Type C Meeting with the FDA on March 6, 2024 to obtain further feedback on our proposed changes to the design of SERENITY III Part 2, including with respect to the trial endpoints, and to discuss the content and format of a potential sNDA submission to expand the label of IGALMI ® 120 micrograms to the acute treatment of agitation associated with schizophrenia and bipolar disorders in the outpatient setting. IGALMI ® is already approved at the 120 mcg dose based on efficacy data that we previously generated in treating a single episode of agitation. Consistent with the data generated to date, the label for IGALMI ® currently includes a limitation on use (“LOU”), noting the lack of efficacy or safety data beyond 24 hours following the first dose. During our March 6, 2024 Type C meeting with the FDA, we discussed, among other things, whether evaluating the at-home use of BXCL501 120 mcg, with safety as the primary objective and efficacy measures as exploratory endpoints, if successful, could support the submission of an sNDA seeking expansion of the current label for IGALMI ® 120 mcg to allow at-home use and labeling without the current LOU. Based on current FDA feedback, we amended the Part 2 of the SERENITY III protocol to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the 120 mg dose in the at-home setting, and now refer to this revised trial as the SERENITY At-Home trial. On August 27, 2025, we announced that the SERENITY At-Home trial evaluating the safety of BXCL501, met its primary endpoint. Additionally, on October 14, 2025, we announced positive results from the correlation study related to exploratory efficacy outcomes from the SERENITY At-Home trial. The results from the correlation study along with that data from this successful study formed the basis of the supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) submission for label expansion of IGALMI ® in the at-home setting, which was submitted to the FDA on January 14, 2026. While we believe that the data from the SERENITY At-home trial supports our planned submission and that we have observed a sufficient number of agitation episodes during the study period to seek labeling without the current LOU and for approval in the at-home setting, there is no guarantee that the FDA will approve our submission and agree to expand of the current label for IGALMI ® 120 mcg to allow at-home use and labeling without the current LOU. Any modifications to our proposed trial designs, whether by us or by the FDA would delay our initiation of such proposed trials, increase the costs of any trial that we do conduct and delay any potential submission of an sNDAs for BXCL501. Requirements to conduct additional clinical trials evaluating BXCL501 in support of our sNDAs submission and any future sNDAs seeking approvals for BXCL501 for our targeted patient populations in at-home settings would increase our costs, and in either case, such modifications or requirements could have a material adverse effect on our prospects and results of operations. 73 Table of Contents In the near term, we are dependent on the success of IGALMI ® , and the development of four of our product candidates, BXCL501, BXCL502, BXCL701 and BXCL702. If we are unable to complete the clinical development of or obtain marketing approval for our product candidates or successfully commercialize IGALMI ® and our other product candidates, either alone or with a collaborator, or if we experience significant delays in doing so, our business could be substantially harmed. We currently have only one product that has received regulatory approval and may never be able to develop additional marketable product candidates. We are continuing to invest a significant portion of our efforts and financial resources in the commercialization of IGALMI ® and development of our four product candidates, BXCL501, BXCL502, BXCL701 and BXCL702, as well as other product candidates. In connection with the Clinical Reprioritization, we have significantly reduced the resources devoted to commercialization of IGALMI ® and it is possible that will have adverse consequences on the revenue that we are able to generate from IGALMI ® in the near term. As part of the Company’s Clinical Reprioritization, the IGALMI ® commercial team shifted focus to a hospital/Integrated Delivery Network (“IDN”) contracting strategy with a Corporate Account Director (CAD) team. The goal of the realigned CAD team is to work with large IDNs and drive sales utilizing a top-down approach. Over time, the revised commercial effort is expected to allow the Company to continue to make inroads into the institutional market in a more cost-efficient manner. In January 2026, Mark Pavao joined the Company as Interim Chief Commercial Officer to support the potential launch of IGALMI ® in the at-home setting, pending FDA approval of our sNDA submission. While this appointment strengthens our commercial readiness, we continue to have limited experience in marketing and selling drug products and may need to further expand our commercial team to successfully launch IGALMI for the at-home indication if approved. However, we have limited experience in drug development and commercialization, and our prospects are substantially dependent on our ability, or that of any future collaborator, to develop, obtain marketing approval for and successfully commercialize product candidates in one or more additional disease indications. The success of IGALMI ® , and of BXCL501, BXCL701, BXCL502 and our other product candidates will depend on several factors, including the following: ● acceptance of an investigational new drug application (“IND”) by the FDA or acceptance of comparable applications by foreign regulatory authorities allowing us to conduct clinical trials of our product candidates in the U.S. or in foreign jurisdictions; ● initiation, progress, timing, costs and results of clinical trials of our product candidates and potential product candidates, including any delays caused by the developments relating to the TRANQUILITY program, and any additional trials we may need to conduct prior to seeking approvals for BXCL501 in at-home and/or care facilities; ● demonstration of safety and efficacy of our product candidates to the satisfaction of the FDA, or any comparable foreign regulatory authority, and sufficient for marketing approval; ● the timing and performance of our current and future collaborators; ● the nature of any required post-marketing clinical trials or other commitments to applicable regulatory authorities; ● establishment of supply arrangements with third-party raw materials suppliers and manufacturers; ● establishment of arrangements with third-party manufacturers to obtain finished drug product that is appropriately packaged for sale; ● adequate ongoing availability of raw materials and drug product for clinical development and any commercial sales; 74 Table of Contents ● obtaining and maintaining patent, trade secret protection and regulatory exclusivity, both in the U.S. and internationally; ● protection of our rights in our intellectual property portfolio; ● successful launch of commercial sales following any marketing approval; ● a continued acceptable safety profile following any marketing approval; ● commercial acceptance by patients, the medical community and third-party payors; and ● our ability to compete with other therapies. Many of these factors are beyond our control, including the results of clinical trials, the time required for the FDA, or any comparable foreign regulatory authorities, to review any regulatory submissions we may make, potential threats to our intellectual property rights and the manufacturing, marketing and sales efforts of any future collaborator. If we are unable to commercialize IGALMI ® or develop, receive marketing approval for and successfully commercialize BXCL501, BXCL701 and our other product candidates, on our own or with any future collaborator, or experience delays because of any of these factors or otherwise, our business could be substantially harmed. Interim “top-line” and preliminary data from our clinical trials, that we announce or publish from time to time, may change as more patient data become available and are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final data. From time to time, we may publicly disclose top-line or preliminary data from our clinical trials, which is based on a preliminary analysis of then-available data. The results and related findings and conclusions based on such preliminary data are subject to change, and have in the past changed, following a more comprehensive review of the data related to the particular study or trial. We also make assumptions, estimations, calculations and conclusions as part of our analyses of data, and we may not have received or had the opportunity to fully and carefully evaluate all data. As a result, the top-line or preliminary results that we report may differ from future results of the same studies, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such results, once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Top-line or preliminary data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the top-line or preliminary data we previously published. As a result, top-line and preliminary data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. From time to time, we may also disclose interim data from our preclinical studies and clinical trials. Interim data from clinical trials that we may complete are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. Adverse differences between interim data and final data could significantly harm our business prospects. Further, disclosure of interim data by us or by our competitors could result in volatility in the price of our common stock. Further, others, including regulatory agencies, may not accept or agree with our assumptions, estimates, calculations, conclusions or analyses or may interpret or weigh the importance of data differently, which could impact the value of the particular program, the approvability or commercialization of the particular product candidate or product and our Company in general. In addition, the information we choose to publicly disclose regarding a particular study or clinical trial is based on what is typically extensive information, and you or others may not agree with what we determine is material or otherwise appropriate information to include in our disclosure. If the interim, top-line or preliminary data that we report differ from actual results, or if others, including regulatory authorities, disagree with the conclusions reached, our ability to obtain approval for, and commercialize, our product candidates may be harmed, which could harm our business, operating results, prospects or financial condition. 75 Table of Contents The regulatory approval processes of the FDA and comparable foreign authorities are lengthy, time-consuming, expensive and inherently unpredictable, and if we are ultimately unable to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates, our business will be substantially harmed. The time required to obtain approval by the FDA and comparable foreign authorities is unpredictable but typically takes many years following the commencement of clinical trials and depends upon numerous factors, including the substantial discretion of the regulatory authorities. The results of preclinical studies and early clinical trials of our product candidates may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials. Product candidates in later stages of clinical trials may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy traits despite having progressed through preclinical studies and initial clinical trials. It is not uncommon for companies in the biopharmaceutical industry to suffer significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials due to nonclinical findings made while clinical studies are underway and safety or efficacy observations made in clinical studies, including previously unreported adverse events. Our future clinical trial results may not be successful, and notwithstanding any potential promising results in earlier studies, we cannot be certain that we will not face similar setbacks. The historical failure rate for product candidates in our industry is high. In addition, approval policies, regulations, or the type and amount of clinical data necessary to gain approval may change during a product candidate’s clinical development and may vary among jurisdictions. We obtained regulatory approval for our first product candidate for the acute treatment of agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar I or II disorder, which is in the early stages of commercialization. It is possible that none of our other product candidates, or any product candidates we may seek to develop in the future, will ever obtain regulatory approval. Our current product candidates, or any that may be developed in the future, could fail to receive regulatory approval for many reasons, including the following: ● the FDA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, may disagree with the design or implementation of our clinical trials; ● we may be unable to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, that a product candidate is safe and effective for its proposed indication; ● the results of clinical trials may not meet the level of statistical significance required by the FDA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, for approval; ● the FDA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, may disagree with our interpretation of data from preclinical studies or clinical trials; ● the data collected from clinical trials of our product candidates may not be sufficient to support the submission of an NDA or other submission or to obtain regulatory approval in the U.S. or elsewhere; ● the FDA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, may disagree that our changes to branded reference drugs meet the criteria for the 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway or comparable foreign regulatory pathways; ● the FDA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, may fail to approve the manufacturing processes or facilities of third-party manufacturers with which we contract for clinical and commercial supplies; and ● the approval policies or regulations of the FDA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, may significantly change in a manner rendering our clinical data insufficient for approval. We have limited experience in completing clinical trials of product candidates. Consequently, we may not have the necessary capabilities, including adequate staffing, to successfully manage the execution and completion of clinical trials we initiate in a way that leads to our obtaining marketing approval for our product candidates in a timely manner, or at all. This lengthy approval process as well as the unpredictability of future clinical trial results may result in our failing to obtain regulatory approval to market our product candidates, which would significantly harm our business, results of operations and prospects. 76 Table of Contents In addition, even if we were to obtain approval, regulatory authorities may approve our product candidates for fewer or more limited indications than we request, may not approve the price we intend to charge for our products, may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials, may approve a product candidate with a label that does not include the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of that product candidate or may restrict its distribution. Any of the foregoing scenarios could materially harm the commercial prospects for our product candidates. We have only submitted one NDA to the FDA and have not submitted any similar marketing applications to comparable foreign authorities, for any product candidate. On January 14, 2026 we submitted a sNDA for label expansion of IGALMI ® in the at-home setting based on the data from the successful SERENITY At-Home trial, we cannot be certain that our submission will be approved, or that our other product candidates currently in development, or any than may be developed in the future, will be successful in clinical trials or receive regulatory approval. During the sNDA review cycle, the FDA requested we modify the child-resistant feature of the primary package of IGALMI ® for use in the at-home setting. We plan to submit a new proposed package design to the FDA in response to their feedback. We have no assurance that the FDA will accept our proposed package design in a timely manner or at all. Any delays in the FDA’s review, feedback or approval of our proposed package design could have a negative impact on the likelihood of receiving approval for our sNDA on the PDUFA target action date of November 14, 2026. Further, our product candidates currently in development, or any that may be developed in the future, may not receive regulatory approval even if we believe they are successful in clinical trials. If we do not receive regulatory approvals for additional product candidates, we may not be able to continue our operations. For any regulatory approvals to market one or more of our product candidates, our revenues will be dependent, in part, upon the size of the markets in the territories for which we gain regulatory approval and have commercial rights. If the markets for patients that we are targeting for IGALMI ® or our other product candidates are not as significant as we estimate, we may not generate significant revenues from sales of IGALMI ® or such other product candidates, if approved. We plan to seek regulatory approval to commercialize our product candidates in the U.S., the European Union (“EU”) and in additional foreign countries. While the scope of regulatory approval is similar in other countries, to obtain separate regulatory approval in many other countries we must comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of such countries regarding safety and efficacy and governing, among other things, clinical trials and commercial sales, pricing and distribution of our product candidates, and we cannot predict success in these jurisdictions. In addition, the FDA’s and other regulatory authorities’ policies with respect to clinical trials may change and additional government regulations may be enacted. For instance, the regulatory landscape related to clinical trials in the EU recently evolved. The EU Clinical Trials Regulation (“CTR”), which was adopted in April 2014 and repeals the EU Clinical Trials Directive, became applicable on January 31, 2022. While the Clinical Trials Directive required a separate clinical trial application (“CTA”), to be submitted in each member state in which the clinical trial takes place, to both the competent national health authority and an independent ethics committee, the CTR introduces a centralized process and only requires the submission of a single application for multi-center trials. The CTR allows sponsors to make a single submission to both the competent authority and an ethics committee in each member state, leading to a single decision per member state. The assessment procedure of the CTA has been harmonized as well, including a joint assessment by all member states concerned, and a separate assessment by each member state with respect to specific requirements related to its own territory, including ethics rules. Each member state’s decision is communicated to the sponsor via the centralized EU portal. Once the CTA is approved, clinical study development may proceed. The CTR foresees a three-year transition period. The extent to which ongoing and new clinical trials will be governed by the CTR varies. For clinical trials whose CTA was made under the Clinical Trials Directive before January 31, 2022, the Clinical Trials Directive will continue to apply on a transitional basis for three years. The CTR transition period ended on January 31, 2025, and all clinical trials (and related applications) are now fully subject to the provisions of the CTR. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies governing clinical trials, our development plans may be impacted. 77 Table of Contents Clinical trials are expensive, time-consuming, difficult to design, difficult to conduct, and involve an uncertain outcome. Before obtaining marketing approval from the FDA, or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities, for the sale of our product candidates, we must complete preclinical development and extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates, in accordance with applicable law and regulations. Failure can occur at any time during the clinical trial process. We have completed the SERENITY At-Home trial evaluating the safety of BXCL501 and, on January 14, 2026, submitted an sNDA for label expansion of IGALMI ® in the at-home setting based on the data from the successful SERENITY At-Home trial and are planning for certain clinical trials relating to BXCL501, BXCL701, BXCL502 and our other product candidates, there can be no assurance that the FDA, or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities, will accept our submission or proposed trial designs as sufficient to establish the safety and/or efficacy of our product candidates. We may experience delays in our clinical trials and we do not know whether planned clinical trials will begin on time, need to be redesigned, enroll patients on time or be completed on schedule, if at all. Clinical trials can be delayed for a variety of reasons, including delays related to: ● the FDA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, disagreeing as to the design or implementation of our clinical studies; ● obtaining regulatory allowances or authorizations to commence a trial or consensus with regulatory authorities on trial designs; ● reaching agreement on acceptable terms with prospective contract research organizations (“CROs”) and clinical trial sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites; ● obtaining institutional review board approval at each site, or independent ethics committee approval at any sites outside the U.S.; ● dependence on the needs and timing of third-party collaborators; ● changes to clinical trial protocols; ● recruiting suitable patients to participate in a trial in a timely manner and in sufficient numbers; ● clinical sites deviating from trial protocol or dropping out of a trial; ● addressing patient safety concerns that arise during the course of a trial; ● having patients complete a trial or return for post-treatment follow-up; ● imposition of a clinical hold by regulatory authorities, including as a result of unforeseen safety issues or side effects or failure of trial sites to adhere to regulatory requirements; ● the occurrence of SAEs in trials of the same class of agents conducted by other companies or institutions; ● subjects choosing an alternative treatment for the indications for which we are developing our product candidates, or participating in competing trials; ● adding a sufficient number of clinical trial sites; ● manufacturing sufficient quantities of a product candidate for use in clinical trials; ● lack of adequate funding to initiate or continue clinical trials; 78 Table of Contents ● selection of clinical end points that require prolonged periods of clinical observation or analysis of the resulting data; ● a facility manufacturing our product candidates or any of their components being ordered by the FDA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, to temporarily or permanently shut down due to violations of current good manufacturing practice (“cGMP”) regulations or other applicable requirements, or infections or cross-contaminations of product candidates in the manufacturing process; ● any changes to our manufacturing process that may be necessary or desired; ● third-party clinical investigators losing the licenses or permits necessary to perform our clinical trials, not performing our clinical trials on our anticipated schedule or consistent with the clinical trial protocol, GCPs or other regulatory requirements; or ● third-party contractors not performing data collection or analysis in a timely or accurate manner; third-party contractors not complying with training and trial protocol; or third-party contractors becoming debarred or suspended or otherwise penalized by the FDA, such as in the case of the recent events relating to the TRANQUILITY II clinical trial, or other government or regulatory authorities, for violations of regulatory requirements, in which case, we may need to find a substitute contractor, and we may not be able to use some or all of the data produced by such contractors in support of our marketing applications. We could encounter delays if a clinical trial is suspended or terminated by us, by the IRBs of the institutions in which such trials are being conducted, by the Data Safety Monitoring Board (“DSMB”) for such trial or by the FDA or other regulatory authorities. Such authorities may impose such a suspension or termination due to a number of factors, including failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or our clinical protocols, inspection of the clinical trial operations or trial site by the FDA or other regulatory authorities resulting in the imposition of a clinical hold, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a drug, changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions or lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial. Furthermore, we rely on CROs and clinical trial sites to ensure the proper and timely conduct of our clinical trials and, while we have agreements governing their committed activities, we have limited influence over their actual performance, which increases the risk that such CROs or trial sites may fail to perform in accordance with regulatory requirements, clinical trial protocols or with the agreements governing their services to us. For example, investigator misconduct affecting our TRANQUILITY II trial, which evaluated BXCL501 in patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease, may have a material adverse impact on our development program for BXCL501 in these patients, as described more fully in the risk factor above entitled: “ Developments relating to our TRANQUILITY II Phase 3 trial may impact the timing of our development plans for, and prospects for seeking or obtaining regulatory approval of, BXCL501 for the acute treatment of agitation (non-daily) associated with dementia in patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease .” Further, conducting clinical trials in foreign countries, as we may do for our current and future product candidates, presents additional risks that may delay completion of our clinical trials. These risks include the failure of enrolled patients in foreign countries to adhere to clinical protocol due to differences in health care services or cultural customs, managing additional administrative burdens associated with foreign regulatory schemes, as well as political and economic risks relevant to such foreign countries. For example, current geopolitical conflicts in Eastern Europe and the Middle East may adversely impact our ability to conduct trials in those regions and elsewhere. If we experience delays in the completion of, or termination of, any clinical trial of our product candidates, the commercial prospects of our product candidates will be harmed, and our ability to generate product revenues from any of these product candidates will be delayed. In addition, any delays in completing our clinical trials will increase our costs, slow down our product candidate development and approval process and jeopardize our ability to commence product sales and generate revenues. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, financial condition and prospects significantly. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates. 79 Table of Contents We depend on enrollment and evaluation of patients in our clinical trials to continue development of our product candidates. If we are unable to enroll patients in our clinical trials, our research and development efforts could be adversely affected. The timely completion of clinical trials in accordance with their protocols depends, among other things, on our ability to enroll and evaluate a sufficient number of patients who remain in the study until its conclusion. We may experience difficulties in patient enrollment or evaluation in our clinical trials for a variety of reasons. Patient enrollment and evaluation is affected by many factors including the size and nature of the patient population, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for the trial, the design of the clinical trial, the size of the patient population required for analysis of the trial’s primary endpoints, our ability to recruit clinical trial investigators with the appropriate competencies and experience, our ability to obtain and maintain patient consents, the risk that patients enrolled in clinical trials will drop out of the trials before evaluation or completion, the frequency of acute agitation symptoms in enrolled patients, the opportunity for evaluation of patients enrolled in our trials, and competing clinical trials and clinicians’ and patients’ perceptions as to the potential advantages of the drug being studied in relation to other available therapies, including any new drugs that may be approved for the indications we are investigating. Many pharmaceutical companies are conducting clinical trials in patients with the disease indications that our product candidates are designed to target. As a result, we must compete with them for clinical sites, physicians and the limited number of patients who fulfill the stringent requirements for participation in clinical trials. Also, due to the confidential nature of clinical trials, we do not know how many of the eligible patients may be enrolled in competing studies and who are consequently not available to us for our clinical trials. Our clinical trials may be delayed or terminated due to the inability to enroll enough patients. The delay or inability to meet planned patient enrollment may result in increased costs and delay or termination of our trials, which could have a harmful effect on our ability to develop products. Our product candidates may cause undesirable side effects or have other properties that could delay or prevent their regulatory approval, limit the commercial profile of an approved label, or result in significant negative consequences following marketing approval. Undesirable side effects caused by our product candidates could cause us or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other comparable foreign authorities. The clinical evaluation of BXCL501, BXCL502, BXCL701, BXCL702 and our other product candidates in patients, in many cases, is ongoing and it is possible that there may be side effects associated with their use. Results of our trials could reveal a high and unacceptable severity and prevalence of these or other side effects. For example, in our Phase 2 clinical trial of BXCL701 for the treatment of emergent neuroendocrine prostate cancer, one patient experienced acidosis with a fatal outcome. Although the clinical investigator could not determine that the fatality was related to treatment with BXCL701, it is possible that BXCL701 could be tied to unacceptable side effects in the future. If we observe drug-related AEs or other unacceptable safety concerns in clinical trials, we, the FDA, the IRBs at the institutions in which our studies are conducted, or the DSMB could suspend or terminate our clinical trials or the FDA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, could order us to cease clinical trials or deny approval of our product candidates for any or all targeted indications. For example, the FDA placed Point Therapeutics, Inc.’s IND for BXCL701 on clinical hold following an increase in observed mortality in patients receiving BXCL701 in a Phase 3 trial in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Though we believe that this result was caused by, among other things, an imbalance in the disease severity of patients enrolled in the active arm of the clinical trial, there is no guarantee that excess mortality will not be observed in future clinical studies. Treatment-related side effects could also affect patient recruitment or the ability of enrolled patients to complete the clinical trial or result in potential product liability claims. In addition, these side effects may not be appropriately recognized or managed by the treating medical staff. We expect to have to train medical personnel using our product candidates to understand the side effect profiles observed in our clinical trials and upon commercialization of any of our product candidates that may receive regulatory approval. Inadequate training in recognizing or managing the potential side effects of our product candidates could result in patient injury or death. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, financial condition and prospects significantly. 80 Table of Contents Additionally, if we or others later identify undesirable side effects caused by IGALMI ® or any other product candidate that receives marketing approval, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result, including: ● regulatory authorities may withdraw approvals of such products; ● we may be required to recall a product or change the way such a product is administered to patients; ● additional restrictions may be imposed on the marketing or distribution of the particular product or the manufacturing processes for the product or any component thereof; ● regulatory authorities may require additional warnings on the label, such as a “black box” warning or contraindication; ● we may be required to implement Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (“REMS”) or create a medication guide outlining the risks of such side effects for distribution to patients, or similar risk management measures; ● we could be sued and held liable for harm caused to patients; ● our product may become less competitive; and ● our reputation may suffer. Any of these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the particular product or product candidate, if approved, and could significantly harm our business, results of operations and prospects. The discovery and development of product candidates based on EvolverAI, BioXcel LLC’s proprietary pharmaceutical discovery and development engine, as well as our own AI platform is novel and unproven, and we do not know whether we will be able to develop any products of commercial value. Our drug discovery and development efforts depend on our own AI platform and BioXcel LLC’s EvolverAI, a proprietary pharmaceutical discovery and development engine, to create a pipeline of neuroscience and immuno-oncology product candidates for patients whose diseases have not been adequately addressed to date by other approaches and to design and conduct efficient clinical trials with a higher likelihood of success. While we believe that applying our AI platform and BioXcel LLC’s EvolverAI to create medicines for defined patient populations may potentially enable drug research and clinical development that is more efficient than conventional drug research and development, our approach is novel. Although we obtained FDA approval for IGALMI ® , because our approach is novel, the cost and time needed to develop our product candidates is difficult to predict, and our efforts may not result in the discovery and development of commercially viable medicines. We may also be incorrect about the effects of our product and product candidates on the diseases of our defined patient populations, which may limit the utility of our approach or the perception of the utility of our approach. Furthermore, our estimates of our defined patient populations available for study and treatment may be lower than expected, which could adversely affect our ability to conduct clinical trials and may also adversely affect the size of any market for medicines we may successfully commercialize. Our approach may not result in time savings, higher success rates or reduced costs as we expect it to, and if not, we may not attract collaborators or develop new drugs as quickly or cost effectively as expected and therefore we may not be able to commercialize our approach as originally expected. Artificial intelligence presents risks and challenges that can impact our business including by posing security risks to our confidential information, proprietary information, and personal data. Issues in the development and use of artificial intelligence, combined with an uncertain regulatory environment, may result in reputational harm, liability, or other adverse consequences to our business operations. As with many technological innovations, artificial intelligence presents risks and challenges that could impact our business. We may adopt and integrate generative artificial intelligence tools into our systems for specific use cases reviewed by legal and information security. Our vendors may incorporate generative artificial intelligence tools into their offerings without 81 Table of Contents disclosing this use to us, and the providers of these generative artificial intelligence tools may not meet existing or rapidly evolving regulatory or industry standards with respect to privacy and data protection and may inhibit our or our vendors’ ability to maintain an adequate level of service and experience. If we, our vendors, or our third-party partners experience an actual or perceived breach or privacy or security incident because of the use of generative artificial intelligence, we may lose valuable intellectual property and confidential information and our reputation and the public perception of the effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed. Further, bad actors around the world use increasingly sophisticated methods, including the use of artificial intelligence, to engage in illegal activities involving the theft and misuse of personal information, confidential information, and intellectual property. Any of these outcomes could damage our reputation, result in the loss of valuable property and information, and adversely impact our business. Additionally, our use of AI and machine learning may be subject to laws and evolving regulations regarding the use of AI or machine learning, controlling for data bias, and anti-discrimination, and we may not always be able to anticipate how to respond to these laws or regulations. Further, there is an increase in litigation in a number of jurisdictions, including the United States, relating to the use of AI, particularly generative AI. Implementation standards and enforcement practices are likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future, and we cannot yet determine the impact future laws, regulations, standards, or perception of their requirements may have on our business. This evolution may create uncertainty in our business, affect our ability to operate in certain jurisdictions or to collect, store, transfer use and share personal information, necessitate the acceptance of more onerous obligations in our contracts, result in liability or impose additional costs on us. The cost of compliance with these laws, regulations and standards is high and is likely to increase in the future. Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with federal, state or foreign laws or regulation, our internal policies and procedures or our contracts governing our processing of personal information could result in negative publicity, government investigations and enforcement actions, claims by third parties and damage to our reputation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial performance and business. The Company’s AI platform and BioXcel LLC’s EvolverAI may fail to help us discover and develop additional potential product candidates. Any drug discovery that we conduct using the Company’s AI platform and BioXcel LLC’s EvolverAI may not be successful in identifying compounds that have commercial value or therapeutic utility. The Company’s AI platform and BioXcel LLC’s EvolverAI may initially show promise in identifying potential product candidates, yet fail to yield viable additional product candidates for clinical development or potential commercialization for a number of reasons, including: ● research programs to identify new product candidates will require substantial technical, financial and human resources, and we may be unsuccessful in our efforts to identify new product candidates. If we are unable to identify suitable additional compounds for preclinical and clinical development, our ability to develop product candidates and obtain product revenues in future periods could be compromised, which could result in significant harm to our financial position and adversely impact our stock price; ● compounds found through the Company’s AI platform and BioXcel LLC’s EvolverAI may not demonstrate efficacy, safety or tolerability; ● potential product candidates may, on further study, be shown to have harmful side effects or other characteristics that indicate that they are unlikely to receive marketing approval and achieve market acceptance; ● competitors may develop alternative therapies that render our potential product candidates non-competitive or less attractive; or ● a potential product candidate may not be capable of being produced at an acceptable cost. 82 Table of Contents Regulators may limit our ability to develop or implement our proprietary AI algorithms and/or may eliminate or restrict the confidentiality of our proprietary technology, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Our future success in novel drug discovery and drug development projects depends on our ability to continue to develop and implement our proprietary AI algorithms and models, and to maintain the confidentiality of this technology. In addition to the current pause in further developing our AI platform, changes to existing regulations, their interpretation or implementation, or new regulations could impede our use of this technology or require that we disclose our proprietary technology to our competitors, which could impair our competitive position and result in an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We obtained Fast Track designation for certain of our product candidates, and we may seek Fast Track designation for other indications or for our other product candidates, but we might not receive such designations, and even if we do, such designations may not actually lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process. If a product candidate is intended for the treatment of a serious condition and nonclinical or clinical data demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical need for this condition, a product sponsor may apply for FDA Fast Track designation. The sponsor of a Fast Track product candidate has opportunities for more frequent interactions with the applicable FDA review team during product development and, once an NDA is submitted, the product candidate may be eligible for priority review if the relevant criteria are met. An NDA for a Fast Track product candidate may also be eligible for rolling review, where the FDA may consider for review sections of the NDA on a rolling basis before the complete application is submitted, if the sponsor provides a schedule for the submission of the sections of the NDA, the FDA agrees to accept sections of the NDA and determines that the schedule is acceptable, and the sponsor pays any required user fees upon submission of the first section of the NDA. We obtained Fast Track designation for BXCL501 for the acute treatment of mild-to-moderate agitation associated with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and dementia, and we further obtained Fast Track designation for BXCL701, in combination with a checkpoint inhibitor, for the treatment of patients with metastatic SCNC with progression on chemotherapy and no evidence of microsatellite instability, and we may seek additional Fast Track designation for BXCL501 or BXCL701 or for one or more of our other product candidates, but we might not receive such designations from the FDA. However, even if we receive Fast Track designation, Fast Track designation does not ensure that we will receive marketing approval or that approval will be granted within any particular timeframe. We may not experience a faster development or regulatory review or approval process with Fast Track designation compared to conventional FDA procedures. In addition, the FDA may withdraw Fast Track designation if it believes that the designation is no longer supported by data from our clinical development program. Fast Track designation alone does not guarantee qualification for the FDA’s priority review procedures. A Breakthrough Therapy designation by the FDA, even if granted for any of our product candidates, may not lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process and it does not increase the likelihood that our product candidates will receive marketing approval. We obtained Breakthrough Therapy Designation for BXCL501 for the acute treatment of agitation associated with dementia, and we may seek additional Breakthrough Therapy designations for our product candidates if the clinical data support such a designation for one or more product candidates. A Breakthrough Therapy is defined as a drug or biologic that is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs or biologics, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development. For product candidates that have been designated as Breakthrough Therapies, interaction and communication between the FDA and the sponsor of the trial can help to identify the most efficient path for clinical development while minimizing the number of patients placed in ineffective control regimens. Product candidates designated as Breakthrough Therapies by the FDA also receive the benefits associated with Fast Track designation, including the potential for rolling review of an NDA. Designation as a Breakthrough Therapy is within the discretion of the FDA. Accordingly, even if we believe one of our product candidates meets the criteria for designation as a Breakthrough Therapy, the FDA may disagree and instead determine not to make such designation. In any event, the receipt of a Breakthrough Therapy designation for a product candidate may not result in a faster development process, review or approval compared to drugs considered for 83 Table of Contents approval under non-expedited FDA review procedures and does not assure ultimate approval by the FDA. In addition, even if one or more of our product candidates qualify as breakthrough therapies, the FDA may later decide that the product no longer meets the conditions for qualification or decide that the period for FDA review or approval will not be shortened. If the FDA does not conclude that our product candidates satisfy the requirements for the 505(b)(2) regulatory approval pathway, or if the requirements for approval of any of our product candidates under Section 505(b)(2) are not as we expect, the approval pathway for our product candidates will likely take significantly longer, cost significantly more and encounter significantly greater complications and risks than anticipated, and in any case may not be successful. We intend to seek FDA approval through the 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway for certain of our product candidates. The Hatch-Waxman Act added Section 505(b)(2) to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”). Section 505(b)(2) permits the filing of an NDA where at least some of the information required for approval comes from studies that were not conducted by or for the applicant. If the FDA does not allow us to pursue the 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway for our product candidates as anticipated, we may need to conduct additional clinical trials, provide additional data and information and meet additional standards for regulatory approval. If this were to occur, the time and financial resources required to obtain FDA approval for our product candidates would likely substantially increase. Moreover, the inability to pursue the 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway could result in new competitive products reaching the market faster than our product candidates, which could materially adversely impact our competitive position and prospects. Even if we are allowed to pursue the 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway for a product candidate, we cannot assure you that we will receive the requisite or timely approvals for commercialization of such product candidate. In addition, we expect that our competitors will file citizens’ petitions with the FDA in an attempt to persuade the FDA that our product candidates, or the clinical studies that support their approval, contain deficiencies. Such actions by our competitors could delay or even prevent the FDA from approving any NDA that we submit under Section 505(b)(2). If we are required by the FDA, or similar regulatory authorities, to obtain approval (or clearance, or certification) of a companion diagnostic device in connection with approval of one of our product candidates, and we do not obtain, or face delays in obtaining approval (or clearance, or certification) of a companion diagnostic device, we will not be able to commercialize the product candidate, and our ability to generate revenue will be materially impaired . According to FDA guidance, if the FDA determines that a companion diagnostic device is essential to the safe and effective use of a novel therapeutic product or indication, the FDA generally will not approve the therapeutic product or new therapeutic product indication if the companion diagnostic is not also approved or cleared for that indication. If a satisfactory companion diagnostic is not commercially available, we may be required to create or obtain one that would be subject to regulatory approval requirements. For example, we may decide to collaborate with patient diagnostic companies during our clinical trial enrollment process for BXCL701 to help identify patients with tumor gene alterations that we believe may be most likely to respond to treatment with BXCL701. The process of obtaining or creating such diagnostic is time consuming and costly. Companion diagnostics are developed in conjunction with clinical programs for the associated product and are subject to regulation as medical devices by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities, and, to date, the FDA has generally required premarket approval of companion diagnostics for cancer therapies. Generally, when a companion diagnostic is essential to the safe and effective use of a therapeutic product, the FDA requires that the companion diagnostic be approved before or concurrent with approval of the therapeutic product and before a product can be commercialized. The approval of a companion diagnostic as part of the therapeutic product’s labeling limits the use of the therapeutic product to only those patients who express the specific genetic alteration that the companion diagnostic was developed to detect. In January 2024, the FDA announced that it intends to initiate the process to reclassify most in vitro diagnostic tests (“IVDs”) that are currently Class III into Class II, including companion diagnostic IVDs. If such reclassification efforts occur, any companion diagnostics that are the subject of the down-classification may no longer require premarket approval, but rather may be marketed pursuant to the generally less burdensome 510(k) clearance process. However, there is no assurance that any companion diagnostic required for our pharmaceutical development programs will benefit from the reclassification, or that the reclassification, even if it does occur, will result in a shorter timeline to development or marketing of the companion diagnostic. 84 Table of Contents If the FDA, or a comparable foreign regulatory authority, requires approval (or certification or clearance) of a companion diagnostic for any of our product candidates, whether before or after the product candidate obtains marketing approval, we and/or third-party collaborators may encounter difficulties in developing and obtaining approval (or clearance, or certification) for these companion diagnostics. Any delay or failure by us or third-party collaborators to develop or obtain regulatory approval (or clearance, or certification) of a companion diagnostic could delay or prevent approval or continued marketing of our related product candidates. We may also experience delays in developing a sustainable, reproducible and scalable manufacturing process for the companion diagnostic or in transferring that process to commercial partners or negotiating insurance reimbursement plans, all of which may prevent us from completing our clinical trials or commercializing our product candidates, if approved, on a timely or profitable basis, if at all. Approval, clearance or certification of companion diagnostics may be subject to further legislative or regulatory reforms notably in the EU. On May 25, 2017, the new In Vitro Medical Devices Regulation No. 2017/746 (“IVDR”) entered into force. The IVDR repeals and replaces the EU In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Directive. Unlike directives, which must be implemented into the national laws of the EU member states, regulations are directly applicable (i.e., without the need for adoption of EU member states laws implementing them) in all EU member states and are intended to eliminate current differences in the regulation of medical devices among EU member states. The IVDR, among other things, is intended to establish a uniform, transparent, predictable and sustainable regulatory framework across the EU for medical devices and ensure a high level of safety and health while supporting innovation. The IVDR became effective in May 2022. However, on October 14, 2021, the European Commission proposed a “progressive” roll-out of the IVDR to prevent disruption in the supply of in vitro diagnostic medical devices. The European Parliament and Council adopted the proposed regulation on December 15, 2021. The IVDR has applied since May 26, 2022, but there is a tiered system extending the grace period for many devices (depending on their risk classification) before they have to be fully compliant with the regulation. The regulation of companion diagnostics in the EU is subject to further requirements since the IVDR became applicable as it introduced a new classification system for companion diagnostics. Companion diagnostics will have to undergo a conformity assessment by a notified body. Before it can issue an EU certificate, the notified body must seek a scientific opinion from the EMA on the suitability of the companion diagnostic to the medicinal product concerned if the medicinal product falls exclusively within the scope of the centralized procedure for the authorization of medicines, or the medicinal product is already authorized through the centralized procedure, or a marketing authorization (“MA”) application for the medicinal product has been submitted through the centralized procedure. For other substances, the notified body can seek the opinion from a national competent authority or the EMA. These modifications may make it more difficult and costly for us to obtain regulatory clearances, approvals or certifications for our companion diagnostics or to manufacture, market or distribute our products after clearance, approval or certification is obtained. Although the FDA has approved IGALMI ® for the acute treatment of agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar I or II disorder, we will still face extensive and ongoing regulatory requirements and obligations for IGALMI ® and for any product candidates for which we obtain approval. Any regulatory approvals that we may receive for IGALMI ® or any of our product candidates will require the submission of reports to regulatory authorities and surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product, may contain significant limitations related to use restrictions for specified age groups, warnings, precautions or contraindications, and may include burdensome post-approval study or risk management requirements. For example, the FDA-approved label for IGALMI ® includes certain warnings and precautions regarding hypotension, orthostatic hypotension, bradycardia, somnolence, and QT interval prolongation. The FDA may also require a REMS to approve a product candidate, which could entail requirements for a medication guide, physician training and communication plans or additional elements to ensure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries and other risk minimization tools. In addition, the manufacturing processes, labeling, packaging, distribution, AE reporting, storage, advertising, promotion, import, export and recordkeeping for IGALMI ® are and will remain subject to extensive and ongoing regulatory requirements. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and 85 Table of Contents reports, registration, and on-going compliance with cGMPs, and GCPs for any clinical trials that we conduct post-approval. In addition, manufacturers of drug products and their facilities are subject to continual review and periodic, unannounced inspections by the FDA and other regulatory authorities for compliance with cGMP regulations and standards. If we or a regulatory authority discover previously unknown problems with a product, such as AEs of unanticipated severity or frequency, or problems with the facilities where the product is manufactured, a regulatory authority may impose restrictions on that product, the manufacturing facility or us, including requiring recall or withdrawal of the product from the market or suspension of manufacturing. In addition, discovery of previously unknown AEs or other problems with our products, manufacturers or manufacturing processes or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may yield various results, including: ● restrictions on manufacturing such products; ● restrictions on the labeling or marketing of products; ● restrictions on product manufacturing, distribution or use; ● requirements to conduct post-marketing studies or clinical trials; ● warning letters or untitled letters; ● withdrawal of the products from the market; ● refusal to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications that we submit; ● recall of products; ● fines, restitution or disgorgement of profits or revenues; ● suspension or withdrawal of marketing approvals; ● refusal to permit the import or export of our products; ● product seizure; or ● injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties. Further, the policies of the FDA and other regulatory authorities may change, and additional government regulations may be enacted that could impose extensive and ongoing regulatory requirements and obligations on any product candidate for which we obtain marketing approval. We also cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative or executive action, either in the U.S. or abroad. The FDA and other regulatory agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses. The FDA and other regulatory authorities strictly regulate marketing, labeling, advertising and promotion of prescription drugs. These regulations include standards and restrictions for direct-to-consumer advertising, industry-sponsored scientific and educational activities, promotional activities involving the internet and off-label promotion. Any regulatory approval that the FDA or any other regulatory authority may grant is limited to those specific diseases and indications for which a product is deemed to be safe and effective. For example, the FDA-approved label for IGALMI ® is currently limited to the acute treatment of agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar I or II disorder in adults to be self-administrated by patients under the supervision of a health care provider. While physicians in the U.S. may choose, and are generally permitted, to prescribe drugs for uses that are not described in the product’s labeling and for uses that differ from those tested in clinical trials and approved by the 86 Table of Contents regulatory authorities, our ability to promote the products is narrowly limited to those indications that are specifically approved by the FDA. These “off-label” uses are common across medical specialties and may constitute an appropriate treatment for some patients in varied circumstances. For example, other formulations of Dex, the active ingredient in IGALMI ® , have been approved for uses beyond those authorized in IGALMI ® approved labeling, such as for use in sedation of surgical patients, and we are continuing to develop BXCL501 for potential use in patients with dementia, MDD, Alzheimer’s disease and other indications. We do not market or promote IGALMI ® for these uses. Regulatory authorities in the U.S. generally do not regulate the behavior of physicians in their choice of treatments. Regulatory authorities do, however, restrict communications by pharmaceutical companies on off-label use. If we are found to have promoted our products for any off-label uses, the U.S. federal government (and other foreign governments) could levy civil, criminal and/or administrative penalties, and seek fines against us. The FDA, or other regulatory authorities, could also require that we enter into a consent decree or a corporate integrity agreement, or seek a permanent injunction against us under which specified promotional conduct is monitored, changed or curtailed. If we cannot successfully manage the promotion of IGALMI ® or our product candidates, if approved, we could become subject to significant liability, which would materially adversely affect our business and financial condition. Disruptions at the FDA and other government agencies caused by funding shortages or staffing reductions could prevent new or modified products from being developed, approved or commercialized in a timely manner or at all, which could negatively impact our business. The ability of the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, statutory, regulatory and policy changes, the FDA’s or foreign regulatory authorities’ ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and other events that may otherwise affect the FDA’s or foreign regulatory authorities’ ability to perform routine functions. Average review times at the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities have fluctuated in recent years as a result of some of these aforementioned issues. In April 2025, the Trump administration conducted unprecedented layoffs at several U.S. health agencies, including the FDA, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health, which is expected to impact the FDA’s ability to review and approve new medicines and conduct necessary inspections. In addition, government funding of the FDA, SEC, and other government agencies on which our operations may rely, including those that fund research and development activities is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable. For example, in the fourth quarter of 2025, the U.S. government was on shutdown for a meaningful period of time and has previously shut down several times, and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, had to furlough critical employees and stop critical activities. To the extent the FDA’s normal operations are disrupted or delayed for a prolonged period of time, for example due to government shutdowns, travel restrictions, public health or geopolitical issues, staffing shortages, layoffs or lack of funding, the FDA may not be able to complete the necessary inspections or provide feedback in a timely manner during our clinical development or review period. If any such delays or disruptions were to occur, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA or other regulatory authorities to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, future government shutdowns could impact our ability to access the public markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly capitalize and continue our operations. We may conduct certain of or portions of our clinical trials for our product candidates outside of the U.S. and the FDA may not accept data from such trials, in which case our development plans will be delayed, which could materially harm our business. We may choose to conduct one or more of our clinical trials or a portion of our clinical trials for our product candidates outside the U.S. The acceptance of study data from clinical trials conducted outside the U.S. or another jurisdiction by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority may be subject to certain conditions or may not be accepted at all. In cases where data from foreign clinical trials are intended to serve as the sole basis for marketing approval in the U.S., the FDA will generally not approve the application on the basis of foreign data alone unless (i) the data are applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice; (ii) the trials were performed by clinical 87 Table of Contents investigators of recognized competence and pursuant to GCP regulations; and (iii) the data may be considered valid without the need for an on-site inspection by the FDA, or if the FDA considers such inspection to be necessary, the FDA is able to validate the data through an on-site inspection or other appropriate means. In addition, even where the foreign study data are not intended to serve as the sole basis for approval, if the clinical trial was not otherwise subject to an IND, the FDA will not accept the data as support for an application for marketing approval unless the study was conducted in accordance with GCP requirements and the FDA is able to validate the data from the study through an on-site inspection if deemed necessary. Many foreign regulatory authorities have similar approval requirements. In addition, such foreign trials would be subject to the applicable local laws of the foreign jurisdictions where the trials are conducted. There can be no assurance that the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority will accept data from trials conducted outside of the U.S. or the applicable jurisdiction. If the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority does not accept such data, it would result in the need for additional trials, which could be costly and time-consuming, and could result in current or future product candidates that we may develop not receiving approval for commercialization in the applicable jurisdiction. Changes in U.S. trade policy and the impact of tariffs may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected by uncertainty and changes in U.S. trade policies, including tariffs, quotas, trade agreements or other trade restrictions imposed by the U.S. or other governments. For example, in April 2025, the U.S. government announced a 10% tariff on product imports from almost all countries and individualized higher tariffs on certain other countries. On October 10, 2025, the U.S. Government announced a 100% tariff on all product imports from China, bringing the total China tariff rate to 130% tariff effective November 1, 2025. While several tariff announcements have been followed by announcements of limited exemptions and temporary pauses, in February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling striking down certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). Following the Supreme Court’s decision, the U.S. presidential administration announced its intention to invoke other laws to collect tariffs and announced new tariffs on imports from all countries, in addition to any existing non-IEEPA tariffs. These actions have caused substantial uncertainty and volatility in financial markets and may result in retaliatory measures on U.S. goods. On April 2, 2026, the U.S. presidential administration issued a proclamation under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 imposing a 100% ad valorem duty on the import of patented pharmaceutical products listed in the FDA's Orange Book or Purple Book, as well as their associated active pharmaceutical ingredients. These tariffs are subject to specified exclusions for generic pharmaceuticals, biosimilars, and orphan drugs. A reduced 20% rate is available for companies with onshoring plans approved by the Secretary of Commerce, though this rate is scheduled to increase to 100% over a four-year period. The tariffs become effective on July 31, 2026, for certain large companies and on September 29, 2026, for all other companies. Because IGALMI® is listed in the Orange Book and is not currently a generic, biosimilar, or orphan drug, we may be subject to these duties to the extent any portion of IGALMI® or its active pharmaceutical ingredient is sourced from outside the United States. While the ultimate impact is uncertain, these tariffs could materially increase our manufacturing costs, which we may be unable to pass on to customers. Furthermore, because Section 232 tariffs were not within the scope of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Learning Resources Inc. v. Trump 610 U.S. (02/20/2026) decision striking down certain IEEPA-based duties, they may be more resilient to legal challenge. Our business requires access to materials to manufacture our products, some of which we source from suppliers located outside the United States. Any imposition of or increase in tariffs or other restrictions on imports of materials on which our products rely, as well as corresponding price increases for such materials available domestically, if any, could increase our costs. We would likely be unable to pass all or any such cost increases on to our customers and such cost increases could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition, including our gross margin. Tariffs or other trade restrictions may lead to continuing uncertainty and volatility in U.S. and global financial and economic conditions and commodity markets, declining consumer confidence, significant inflation and diminished expectations for the economy. Such conditions could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial position. Also, disruptions and volatility in the financial markets may lead to adverse changes 88 Table of Contents in the availability, terms and cost of capital. Such adverse changes could increase our costs of capital and limit our access to external financing sources . We may be subject to extensive regulations outside the U.S. and may not obtain marketing approvals for products in Europe and other jurisdictions. In addition to regulations in the U.S., should we or our collaborators pursue marketing approvals for IGALMI ® , and for BXCL501, BXCL502, BXCL701, BXCL702 and our other product candidates internationally, we and our collaborators will be subject to a variety of regulations in other jurisdictions governing, among other things, clinical trials and any commercial sales and distribution of our products. Whether or not we, or our collaborators, obtain FDA approval for a product, we must obtain the requisite approvals from regulatory authorities in foreign countries prior to the commencement of clinical trials or marketing of the product in those countries. The requirements and process governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary from country to country. We expect to pursue marketing approvals for IGALMI ® , and may pursue marketing approvals for BXCL501, BXCL502, BXCL701, BXCL702 and our other product candidates in Europe and other jurisdictions outside the U.S. with collaborative partners. The time and process required to obtain regulatory approvals and reimbursement in Europe and other jurisdictions may be different from those in the U.S. Also, regulatory approval in one jurisdiction does not ensure approvals in any other jurisdiction; however, negative regulatory decisions in any jurisdiction may have a negative impact on the regulatory process in other jurisdictions. Following a national referendum and enactment of legislation by the government of the United Kingdom (“UK”), the UK formally withdrew from the EU on January 31, 2020 and ratified a trade and cooperation agreement governing its future relationship (commonly referred to as “Brexit”). The agreement, which was applied provisionally from January 1, 2021 and entered into force on May 1, 2021, addresses trade, economic arrangements, law enforcement, judicial cooperation and a governance framework including procedures for dispute resolution, among other things. Because the agreement merely sets forth a framework in many respects and requires complex additional bilateral negotiations between the UK and the EU as both parties continue to work on the rules for implementation, significant political and economic uncertainty remains about how the precise terms of the relationship between the parties will differ from the terms before withdrawal. Since January 1, 2021, the UK operates under a distinct regulatory regime to the EU. EU pharmaceutical laws only apply in respect of the UK to Northern Ireland (as set out in the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland). EU laws which have been transposed into UK law through secondary legislation continue to be applicable as “retained EU law”. While the UK has indicated a general intention that new laws regarding the development, manufacture and commercialization of medicinal products in the UK will align closely with EU law, there are limited detailed proposals for future regulation of medicinal products. The trade and cooperation agreement includes specific provisions concerning medicinal products, which include the mutual recognition of cGMP, inspections of manufacturing facilities for medicinal products and cGMP documents issued (such mutual recognition can be rejected by either party in certain circumstances) but does not foresee wholesale mutual recognition of UK and EU pharmaceutical regulations. For example, it is not clear to what extent the UK will adopt legislation aligned with, or similar to, the EU CTR which became applicable on January 31, 2022 and which significantly reforms the assessment and supervision processes for clinical trials throughout the EU. On January 17, 2022, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (“MHRA”) launched an eight-week consultation on reframing the UK legislation for clinical trials which aimed to streamline clinical trials approvals, enable innovation, enhance clinical trials transparency, enable greater risk proportionality, and promote patient and public involvement in clinical trials. The MHRA responded to the consultation on March 21, 2023 and confirmed that it would bring forward changes to the legislation. The final legal texts introduced by the UK Government will ultimately determine the extent to which the UK clinical trials framework aligns with or diverges from the EU CTR. A decision by the UK not to closely align its regulations with the new approach that will be adopted in the EU may have an effect on the cost of conducting clinical trials in the UK as opposed to other countries. Therefore, there remains political and economic uncertainty regarding to what extent the regulation of medicinal products will differ between the UK and the EU in the future. Any divergences will increase the cost and complexity of running our business, including with respect to the conduct of clinical trials. Brexit also materially impacted the 89 Table of Contents regulatory regime with respect to the approval of our product candidates. Great Britain is no longer covered by the EU’s procedures for the grant of MAs (Northern Ireland is covered by the centralized authorization procedure and can be covered under the decentralized or mutual recognition procedures). As of January 1, 2021, all existing centralized MAs were automatically converted into UK MAs effective in Great Britain and issued with a UK MA number on January 1, 2021 (unless MA holders opted out of this scheme). A separate MA is now required to market drugs in Great Britain. It is currently unclear whether the regulator in the UK, the MHRA, is sufficiently prepared to handle the increased volume of MA applications that it is likely to receive. Any delay in obtaining, or an inability to obtain, any regulatory approvals, as a result of Brexit or otherwise, would prevent us from commercializing our product candidates in Great Britain and restrict our ability to generate revenue and achieve and sustain profitability. If any of these outcomes occur, we may be forced to restrict or delay efforts to seek regulatory approval in Great Britain for our product candidates, which could significantly and materially harm our business. Any of these factors could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. If we are found in violation of federal, state or foreign health care “fraud and abuse” laws, we may be required to pay significant fines and penalties, including, without limitation, debarment, suspension or exclusion from participation in federal, state or similar health care programs, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In the U.S., we are subject to various federal and state health care “fraud and abuse” laws, including anti- kickback laws, false claims laws and other laws intended to reduce fraud and abuse in federal and state health care programs, which could affect us, and our ability to successfully commercialize our products in the U.S. We may have to comply with similar laws and regulations outside the U.S. These laws include: ● the federal Anti-Kickback Statute makes it illegal for any person, including a prescription drug manufacturer (or a party acting on its behalf), to knowingly and willfully solicit, receive, offer or pay any remuneration that is intended to induce the referral of business, including the purchase, order or prescription of a particular drug for which payment may be made under a federal health care program, such as Medicare or Medicaid. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it to have committed a violation; ● false claims laws prohibit anyone from knowingly and willfully presenting or causing to be presented for payment to third-party payers, including government payers, claims for reimbursed drugs or services that are false or fraudulent, claims for items or services that were not provided as claimed, or claims for medically unnecessary items or services. Cases have been brought under false claims laws alleging that off-label promotion of pharmaceutical products or the provision of kickbacks has resulted in the submission of false claims to governmental health care programs. In addition, the government may assert that a claim, including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the false claims laws. Further, private individuals have the ability to bring actions on behalf of the government under the federal False Claims Act; ● the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) prohibits persons or entities from knowingly and willfully executing a scheme to defraud any health care benefit program, including private payers, or knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items or services. Similar to the federal Anti- Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of these statutes or specific intent to violate them to have committed a violation; ● federal civil monetary penalties laws, which impose civil fines for, among other things, the offering or transfer of remuneration to a Medicare or state health care program beneficiary if the person knows, or should know, it is likely to influence the beneficiary’s selection of a particular provider, practitioner, or supplier of services reimbursable by Medicare or a state health care program, unless an exception applies; ● federal consumer protection and unfair competition laws, which broadly regulate marketplace activities and activities that potentially harm consumers; 90 Table of Contents ● the federal physician sunshine requirements under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, (“ACA”), which requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics, and medical supplies to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors), certain non-physician practitioners (physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified registered nurse anesthetists, anesthesiologist assistants, and certified nurse midwives), and teaching hospitals, and ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members; ● state law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial insurers; state laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the applicable compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government, or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to health care providers and other potential referral sources; and state laws that require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other health care providers or marketing expenditures and pricing information; and ● European and other foreign law equivalents of each of the laws, including reporting requirements detailing interactions with and payments to health care providers. The risk of our being found in violation of these laws is increased by the fact that many of them have not been fully interpreted by the regulatory authorities or the courts, and their provisions are open to a variety of interpretations. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management’s attention from the operation of our business. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or any other governmental laws and regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, the exclusion from participation in federal and state or foreign health care programs, additional reporting obligations and oversight if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or other agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws, any of which could adversely affect our ability to market our products and adversely impact our financial results. We may be unable to maintain sufficient clinical trial liability insurance. Our inability to retain sufficient clinical trial liability insurance at an acceptable cost to protect against potential liability claims could prevent or inhibit our ability to conduct clinical trials for product candidates we develop. We may be unable to obtain appropriate levels of such insurance. Even if we do secure clinical trial liability insurance for our programs, we may not be able to achieve sufficient levels of such insurance. Any claim that may be brought against us could result in a court judgment or settlement in an amount that is not covered, in whole or in part, by our insurance or that exceeds the limits of our insurance coverage. We have supplemented our clinical trial coverage with product liability coverage in connection with the commercial launch of IGALMI ® and expect that we would similarly supplement our coverage for any of our other product candidates that may receive regulatory approval, but we may be unable to obtain such increased coverage on acceptable terms or at all. If we are found liable in a clinical trial lawsuit or a product liability lawsuit in the future, we will have to pay any amounts awarded by a court or negotiated in a settlement that exceed our coverage limitations or that are not covered by our insurance, and we may not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient capital to pay such amounts. Risks Related to Commercialization of Our Product Candidates If our products do not gain market acceptance or if we fail to accurately forecast demand or manage our inventories, our business will suffer because we might not be able to fund future operations. A number of factors may affect the market acceptance of our products or any other products or product candidates we develop or acquire, including, among others: ● the price of our products relative to other products for the same or similar treatments; 91 Table of Contents ● the perception by patients, physicians and other members of the health care community of the effectiveness, utility and safety of our products for their indicated applications and treatments; ● our ability to fund our sales and marketing efforts; and ● the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts, including our strategic refocus to hospital/IDNs as part of the Clinical Reprioritization. If our products do not gain market acceptance, we may not be able to fund future operations, including developing, testing and obtaining regulatory approval for new product candidates and expanding our sales and marketing efforts for our approved products, which would cause our business to suffer. We plan to continue to commercialize IGALMI ® sublingual film for the acute treatment of agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar I or II disorder, to be self-administered by patients under the supervision of a healthcare provider, which is our only approved product to date. However, in connection with the Clinical Reprioritization, we significantly reduced the resources devoted to commercialization of IGALMI ® and it is possible that will have adverse consequences on the revenue that we are able to generate from IGALMI ® . Revenues for IGALMI ® for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 were $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively. If our commercial products do not gain market acceptance, we may not be able to fund future operations, including developing, testing and obtaining regulatory approval for an sNDA for other BXCL501 indications, including in the at-home setting for the acute treatment of agitation (non-daily) associated with dementia due to probable Alzheimer’s disease, or for other product candidates that it may develop. Our results of operations could be materially harmed if we are unable to successfully commercialize IGALMI ® for any currently or additionally approved indications or any future product candidates that we may have approved. Our results of operations could be materially harmed if we are unable to accurately forecast customer demand for IGALMI ® and manage our inventory. To ensure adequate inventory supply, we must forecast inventory needs and place orders with our suppliers based on our estimates of future demand for IGALMI ® . Our ability to accurately forecast demand for IGALMI ® could be negatively affected by many factors, including our failure to accurately manage our expansion strategy, product introductions by competitors, an increase or decrease in customer demand for IGALMI ® or for products of our competitors, our failure to accurately forecast customer acceptance of new products, unanticipated changes in general market conditions or regulatory matters, and weakening of economic conditions or consumer confidence in future economic conditions. Inventory levels in excess of customer demand may result in inventory write-downs or write-offs, which would cause our gross margin to be adversely affected and could impair the strength of our brand. Conversely, if we underestimate customer demand for IGALMI ® , our third-party contract manufacturer may not be able to deliver products to meet our requirements, and this could result in damage to our reputation and customer relationships. In addition, if we experience a significant increase in demand, additional supplies of raw materials or additional manufacturing capacity may not be available when required on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all, or suppliers or our third-party manufacturers may not be able to allocate sufficient capacity in order to meet our increased requirements, which could have an adverse effect on our ability to meet customer demand for IGALMI ® and our results of operations. We seek to maintain sufficient levels of inventory to protect ourselves from supply interruptions. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a portion of our inventory will become obsolete or expire, which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and cash flows due to the resulting costs associated with the inventory impairment charges and costs required to replace such inventory. 92 Table of Contents Our estimated number of episodes of agitation and our corresponding estimated total addressable market are subject to inherent challenges and uncertainties. If we have overestimated the number of episodes or the size of our total addressable market for our current and potential future products or product candidates, or if any approval that we obtain is based on a narrower definition of the patient population, our revenue and ability to achieve profitability may be harmed. We have based our potential market opportunity on a number of internal and third-party estimates and resources, including, without limitation, management’s estimates and research, as well as industry and general publications and research, surveys and studies conducted by third parties, which may be incorrect. Our estimated potential market opportunity is based on estimates of episodes of agitation across our indications, and these estimated episodes of agitation are also based on internal and third-party estimates and market resources using data self-reported by patients. The conditions supporting our assumptions or estimates and the market data supporting these assumptions and estimates may change at any time or otherwise be inaccurate, thereby reducing the predictive accuracy of these underlying factors. Our total addressable market will ultimately depend upon, among other things, the number of actual treatable episodes, the diagnosis criteria included in the final label for each of our product candidates, if approved for sale for these indications, acceptance by the medical community and patient access, drug pricing and reimbursement. The number of patients and treatable episodes in the United States and other major markets and elsewhere may turn out to be materially lower than expected, the number of treatable episodes may be significantly fewer than total episodes experienced, patients may not be otherwise amenable to treatment with our product candidates or new patients may become increasingly difficult to identify or gain access to, all of which would harm our results of operations and our business. For example, our estimates of the monthly average episodes for patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder and patients diagnosed with schizophrenia and, therefore, our estimated total addressable market are based on third-party market surveys which differ from an observational study in the EU of inhaled loxapine for the treatment of agitation in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder conducted which found that only 40% of enrolled patients reported agitation episodes in the six-month study period. If third-party or internally generated data prove to be inaccurate or we make errors in our assumptions based on that data, our total addressable market may be meaningfully smaller than we have estimated, our future growth opportunities and sales growth may be impaired, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We obtained Orphan Drug Designation for BXCL701 for the treatment of pancreatic cancer, melanoma, acute myeloid leukemia and soft tissue sarcoma and we may seek Orphan Drug Designation for other indications or product candidates, and we may be unable to maintain the benefits associated with Orphan Drug Designation, including the potential for market exclusivity, and may not receive Orphan Drug Designation for other indications or for our other product candidates. Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions, including the U.S. and EU, may designate drugs intended for relatively small patient populations as orphan drugs. Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may designate a drug as an orphan drug if it is a drug intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally defined as a patient population of fewer than 200,000 individuals in the U.S., or a patient population greater than 200,000 individuals in the U.S. where there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing the drug will be recovered from sales in the U.S. In the EU, orphan drug designation is granted by the European Commission based on a scientific opinion of the EMA’s Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products. A medicinal product may be designated as orphan if its sponsor can establish that (i) the product is intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition; (ii) either (a) such condition affects no more than 5 in 10,000 persons in the EU when the application is made, or (b) the product, without the benefits derived from orphan status, would not generate sufficient return in the EU to justify investment; and (iii) there exists no satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of such condition authorized for marketing in the EU, or if such a method exists, the medicinal product will be of significant benefit to those affected by the condition. The application for orphan designation must be submitted before the application for MA. In the U.S., orphan drug designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant funding towards clinical trial costs, tax advantages and user-fee waivers. In addition, if a product that has orphan drug designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the disease or condition for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to orphan drug exclusivity. Orphan drug exclusivity in the U.S. provides that the FDA may not 93 Table of Contents approve any other applications, including a full NDA, to market the same drug for the same disease or condition for seven years. In limited circumstances, the applicable exclusivity period is 10 years in the EU. The EU exclusivity period can be reduced to six years if, at the end of the fifth year, it is established that a drug no longer meets the criteria for orphan drug designation or if the drug is sufficiently profitable so that market exclusivity is no longer justified. In January 2021, the FDA granted Orphan Drug Designation to BXCL701 for the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. In September 2019, the FDA granted Orphan Drug Designation to BXCL701 for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Prior to 2019, the FDA granted Orphan Drug Designation to BXCL701 for the treatment of pancreatic cancer and melanoma. We may seek Orphan Drug Designations for BXCL701 in other diseases or conditions or for other product candidates. There can be no assurances that we will be able to obtain such designations. Even if we, or any future collaborators, obtain orphan drug designation for a product candidate, we, or they, may not be able to obtain or maintain orphan drug exclusivity for that product candidate. We may not be the first to obtain marketing approval of any product candidate for which we have obtained orphan drug designation for the orphan- designated indication due to the uncertainties associated with developing pharmaceutical products, and it is possible that another company also holding orphan drug designation for the same product candidate will receive marketing approval for the same disease or condition before we do. If that were to happen, our applications for that disease or condition may not be approved until the competing company’s period of exclusivity expires. In addition, exclusive marketing rights in the U.S. and abroad may be limited if we seek approval for an indication broader than the orphan-designated disease or condition or may be lost if the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities later determines that the request for designation was materially defective or if we are unable to assure sufficient quantities of the product to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or condition. Further, even if we, or any future collaborators, obtain orphan drug exclusivity for a product, that exclusivity may not effectively protect the product from competition because different drugs with different active ingredients may be approved for the same disease or condition. Even after an orphan drug is approved, the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities can subsequently approve the same drug with the same active ingredient for the same condition if the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities conclude that the later drug is clinically superior in that it is shown to be safer, more effective or makes a major contribution to patient care or the manufacturer of the product with orphan exclusivity is unable to maintain sufficient product quantity. Orphan drug designation neither shortens the development or regulatory review time of a drug, nor gives the drug any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process and does not prevent competitors from obtaining approval of the same product candidate as ours for indications other than those in which we have been granted orphan drug designation. If we are unable to develop satisfactory sales and marketing capabilities, we may not succeed in commercializing IGALMI ® or any product candidate for which we may obtain regulatory approval. We have limited experience in marketing and selling drug products. We have not entered into arrangements for the sale and marketing of IGALMI ® , BXCL501, BXCL502, BXCL701, BXCL702 or any other product candidate. Typically, pharmaceutical companies would employ groups of sales representatives and associated sales and marketing staff numbering in the hundreds to thousands of individuals to call on the large number of physicians and hospitals. Following our Clinical Reprioritization, we may need to rebuild a commercial sales and marketing team if we seek to modify our commercial strategy for IGALMI ® or initiate commercial sales for any product candidate in the future, which will likely require significant cost. We may seek to collaborate with a third-party to market our drugs or may seek to market and sell our drugs by ourselves. If we seek to collaborate with a third-party, we cannot be sure that a collaborative agreement can be reached on terms acceptable to us. We may also need to hire additional personnel skilled in marketing and sales for our direct marketing and selling efforts. We cannot be sure that we will be able to acquire, or establish third-party relationships to provide, any or all of these marketing and sales capabilities. The maintenance and expansion of our direct sales force or establishment of a contract sales force, or a combination thereof, as applicable, to market our products is expensive and time-consuming and could delay any product launch. In addition, reputational harm from the Clinical Reprioritization may adversely impact our efforts to hire personnel skilled in marketing and sales. Further, we can give no assurances that we will be able to maintain a direct and/or contract sales force for any period of time or that our sales efforts will be sufficient to grow our revenues or that our sales efforts will ever lead to profits. A direct sales force has in the past subjected and may in the future subject us to higher fixed costs than those of companies that market competing products through independent third parties, due to t