24 unchanged sentences
the Patent & Technology Exclusive and Non-Exclusive License Agreement between Bitech Mining Corporation and SuperGreen dated January
−Removed: 15, 2021 as amended on January 15, 2021 and on March 26, 2022 (the “License Agreement”) and SuperGreen canceled 51,507,749
+Added: 15, 2021 as amended on January 15, 2021 and on March 26, 2022 (the “License Agreement”) and SuperGreen cancelled 51,507,749
shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share issued by the Company to SuperGreen pursuant to the License Agreement.
4 unchanged sentences
March 6, 2023, Michael Cao and Linh Dao filed, without an attorney, a pro se Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.
−Removed: April 17, 2023, the court dismissed the Cao Lawsuit without prejudice due to a lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
−Removed: 2023, we filed a complaint against Michael H.
−Removed: Dao, B & B Investment Holding, LLC (“B & B
−Removed: Investment”) and Cory Thomason in the Orange County California Superior Court containing substantially the same allegations
−Removed: included in the Cao Lawsuit filed in federal court (the “Cao State Court Lawsuit”).
+Added: On April 17, 2023, the court
+Added: dismissed the Cao Lawsuit without prejudice due to a lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
+Added: On April 18, 2023, we filed a complaint against
+Added: Dao, B & B Investment Holding, LLC (“B & B Investment”) and Cory Thomason in the Orange County
+Added: California Superior Court containing substantially the same allegations included in the Cao Lawsuit filed in federal court (the “Cao
+Added: State Court Lawsuit”).
We served Mr.
−Removed: & B Investment Holding, LLC on April 26, 2023 and are in the process of serving Mr.
+Added: Dao and B & B Investment Holding, LLC on April 26, 2023 and are continuing efforts
Defendants Michael H.
Dao, B & B Investment (pro se) filed a Motion to Quash Service of Summons;
−Removed: Motion to Dismiss or Stay Complaint.
−Removed: In response to this motion, the Company filed a Motion to Strike B & B Investment’s motion,
−Removed: Request for Sanctions in Amount of $2,400 and Request for Default as to B & B Investment because it is being impermissibly represented
−Removed: by Michael H.
−Removed: Cao who is engaging in the unauthorized practice of law as to a corporate entity.
−Removed: A hearing on the motions has been set
−Removed: for October 13, 2023.
−Removed: Cao has served responses to discovery.
−Removed: We are attempting to meet and confer as to Michael H.
−Removed: deficient discovery responses.
+Added: Motion to Dismiss or Stay Complaint (the “B & B Motions”).
+Added: In response to this motion, the Company filed a Motion to Strike
+Added: B & B Investment’s motion (the “Motion to Strike”), Request for Sanctions in Amount of $2,400 and Request for Default
+Added: as to B & B Investment because it is being impermissibly represented by Michael H.
+Added: Cao who is engaging in the unauthorized practice
+Added: of law as to a corporate entity.
+Added: On October 13, 2023, the Court granted in part the Company’s unopposed Motion to Strike, striking
+Added: the B & B Investment Motions and ordering B &B Investment to retain an attorney no later than October 27, 2023 or be subject to
+Added: default because corporate entities are not permitted to appear in court without an attorney.
+Added: The Court denied Mr.
+Added: Cao’s Motion to
+Added: Quash and took Linh Dao’s Motion to Quash off calendar, thus keeping all Defendants in the case.
+Added: The Court ruled that Michael Cao
+Added: already waived his rights to file such a motion by making a general appearance in the case and noted that Defendants failed to appear
+Added: at the hearing.
+Added: On or about October 27, 2023, the Company’s counsel received an initial communication from an attorney attaching
+Added: responses to the Company’s complaint on behalf of Mr.
+Added: Cao and B&B Investment.
+Added: The Company’s counsel has not been able
+Added: to verify if this response has been properly filed with the Court by the deadline.
+Added: Cao has served initial
+Added: responses to our discovery requests, but we believe these responses are evasive and assert unnecessary objections.
+Added: After attempting to
+Added: meet and confer with Mr.
+Added: Cao, we filed motions to compel further responses to our discovery requests which is set for a hearing on December
+Added: Cao has yet to serve any opposition to these Motions to Compel.
+Added: The Company intends to continue pressing forward with discovery
+Added: as to all Defendants.
Company intends to vigorously prosecute the Cao State Court Lawsuit.
14 unchanged sentences
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.