Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
A number of lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be asserted against the Company relating to the conduct of its currently or formerly owned businesses, including those pertaining to product liability, environmental, health and safety matters and occupational disease (including as each relates to alleged asbestos exposure), as well as patent infringement, commercial, government contracting, construction, employment, employee and retiree benefits, taxes, environmental, and stockholder and corporate governance matters. Certain of such lawsuits, claims and proceedings are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, and addressed in Note 16 to the unaudited interim financial statements included herein. While the outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and some of these lawsuits, claims or proceedings may be determined adversely to the Company, management does not believe that the disposition of any such pending matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or liquidity, although the resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations for that period.
ATI Titanium LLC (ATI Titanium), a subsidiary of ATI Inc., is party to a lawsuit captioned US Magnesium, LLC v. ATI Titanium LLC (Case No. 2:17-cv-00923-DB) and filed in federal district court in Salt Lake City, UT, pertaining to a Supply and Operating Agreement between US Magnesium LLC (USM) and ATI Titanium entered into in 2006 (the Supply Agreement). In 2016, ATI Titanium notified USM that it would suspend performance under the Supply Agreement in reliance on certain terms and conditions included in the Supply Agreement. USM subsequently filed a claim challenging ATI Titanium’s right to suspend performance under the Supply Agreement, claiming that such suspension was a material breach of the Supply Agreement and seeking monetary damages, and ATI Titanium filed a counterclaim for breach of contract against USM. In 2018, USM obtained leave of the court to add ATI Inc. as a separate party defendant, and ATI Titanium filed a motion to dismiss the claim against ATI Inc., which the court denied on April 19, 2019. After the conclusion of discovery, ATI Inc. filed a motion for summary judgment. On August 17, 2021, the court granted the motion, and entered summary judgment
40
in favor of ATI Inc. finding that it is not the alter ego of ATI Titanium and that it did not breach any obligations allegedly owed to USM. A trial date has been set for October 11, 2022. Following a failed mediation in March 2022, ATI Titanium recorded an $8.6 million litigation reserve on this matter in the first quarter of 2022. While ATI Titanium intends to vigorously defend against and pursue these claims, it cannot predict their outcomes at this time.
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.