Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1A. Risk Factors
An investment in our securities
involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully all of the risks described below, together with the other information contained
in this Form 10-K. If any of the following events occur, our business, financial condition and operating results may be materially adversely
affected. In that event, the trading price of our securities could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment .
Risks Relating to our Search for, Consummation of, or Inability
to Consummate, a Business Combination
Our shareholders may not be afforded an
opportunity to vote on our proposed initial Business Combination, and even if we hold a vote, holders of our Founder Shares will participate
in such vote, which means we may complete our initial Business Combination even though a majority of our Public Shareholders do not support
such a combination.
We may choose not to hold
a shareholder vote to approve our initial Business Combination if the Business Combination would not require shareholder approval under
applicable law or stock exchange listing requirement. Except for as required by applicable law or stock exchange requirement, the decision
as to whether we will seek shareholder approval of a proposed Business Combination or will allow shareholders to sell their shares to
us in a tender offer will be made by us, solely in our discretion, and will be based on a variety of factors, such as the timing of the
transaction and whether the terms of the transaction would otherwise require us to seek shareholder approval. Even if we seek shareholder
approval, the holders of our Founder Shares will participate in the vote on such approval. Accordingly, we may complete our initial Business
Combination even if a majority of our Public Shareholders do not approve of the Business Combination we complete. Please see the section
entitled “ Business - Shareholders May Not Have the Ability to Approve Our Initial Business Combination ”
for additional information.
13
If we seek shareholder approval of our initial
Business Combination, our initial shareholders and management team have agreed to vote in favor of such initial Business Combination,
regardless of how our Public Shareholders vote.
Our initial shareholders own
20% of our outstanding ordinary shares. Our initial shareholders and management team also may from time-to-time purchase Class A Ordinary
Shares prior to our initial Business Combination. Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provides that, if we
seek shareholder approval of an initial Business Combination, such initial Business Combination will be approved if we receive the affirmative
vote of at least a majority of the voted at such meeting of the company. As a result, in addition to our initial shareholders’ Founder
Shares, we would need 8,625,001 or 37.5% of the 28,750,000 Public Shares sold in our IPO to be voted in favor of an initial Business Combination
in order to have our initial Business Combination approved (assuming all outstanding shares are voted). Assuming that only the holders
of one-third of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares, representing a quorum under our amended and restated memorandum and articles
of association, vote their ordinary shares at a general meeting of the company, we will not need any Public Shares in addition to our
Founder Shares to be voted in favor of an initial Business Combination in order to approve an initial Business Combination. However, if
our initial Business Combination is structured as a statutory merger or consolidation with another company under Cayman Islands law, the
approval of our initial Business Combination requires a special resolution passed by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of our
ordinary shares which are represented in person or by proxy and are voted at a general meeting of the company. Accordingly, if we seek
shareholder approval of our initial Business Combination, the agreement by our initial shareholders and management team to vote in favor
of our initial Business Combination will increase the likelihood that we will receive the requisite shareholder approval for such initial
Business Combination.
Your only opportunity to effect your investment decision regarding
a potential Business Combination may be limited to the exercise of your right to redeem your shares from us for cash.
At the time of your investment
in us, you will not be provided with an opportunity to evaluate the specific merits or risks of our initial Business Combination. Since
our board of directors may complete a Business Combination without seeking shareholder approval, Public Shareholders may not have the
right or opportunity to vote on the Business Combination, unless we seek such shareholder vote. Accordingly, your only opportunity to
effect your investment decision regarding our initial Business Combination may be limited to exercising your redemption rights within
the period of time (which will be at least 20 business days) set forth in our tender offer documents mailed to our Public Shareholders
in which we describe our initial Business Combination. The amount of the deferred underwriting commissions payable to the underwriters
is not currently required to be adjusted for any shares that are redeemed in connection with an initial Business Combination. The per
share amount we will distribute to shareholders who properly exercise their redemption rights will not be reduced by the deferred underwriting
commission and after such redemptions, the per-share value of shares held by non-redeeming shareholders will reflect our obligation to
pay the deferred underwriting commission.
The ability of our Public Shareholders to
redeem their shares for cash may make our financial condition unattractive to potential Business Combination targets, which may make it
difficult for us to enter into a Business Combination with a target.
We may seek to enter into
a Business Combination transaction agreement with minimum cash requirement for (i) cash consideration to be paid to the target or its
owners, (ii) cash for working capital or other general corporate purposes or (iii) the retention of cash to satisfy other conditions.
If too many Public Shareholders exercise their redemption rights, we would not be able to meet such closing condition and, as a result,
would not be able to proceed with the Business Combination.
Consequently, if accepting
all properly submitted redemption requests would not allow us to satisfy a closing condition as described above, we would not proceed
with such redemption and the related Business Combination and may instead search for an alternate Business Combination. Prospective targets
will be aware of these risks and, thus, may be reluctant to enter into a Business Combination transaction with us.
14
The ability of our Public Shareholders to
exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares and the amount of deferred underwriting compensation may not allow
us to complete the most desirable Business Combination or optimize our capital structure, and may substantially dilute your investment
in us.
At the time we enter into
an agreement for our initial Business Combination, we will not know how many shareholders may exercise their redemption rights, and therefore
will need to structure the transaction based on our expectations as to the number of shares that will be submitted for redemption. If
our initial Business Combination agreement requires us to use a portion of the cash in the Trust Account to pay the purchase price, or
requires us to have a minimum amount of cash at closing, we will need to reserve a portion of the cash in the Trust Account to meet such
requirements, or arrange for third party financing. In addition, if a larger number of shares is submitted for redemption than we initially
expected, we may need to restructure the transaction to reserve a greater portion of the cash in the Trust Account or arrange for third
party financing. Raising additional third-party financing may involve dilutive equity issuances or the incurrence of indebtedness at higher
than desirable levels. Furthermore, this dilution would increase to the extent that the anti-dilution provision of the Class B ordinary
shares results in the issuance of Class A Ordinary Shares on a greater than one-to-one basis upon conversion of the Class B ordinary shares
at the time of our initial Business Combination. In addition, the amount of the deferred underwriting commissions payable to the underwriters
will not be adjusted for any shares that are redeemed in connection with an initial Business Combination. The per share amount we will
distribute to shareholders who properly exercise their redemption rights will not be reduced by the deferred underwriting commission and
after such redemptions, the amount held in trust will continue to reflect our obligation to pay the entire deferred underwriting commissions.
The above considerations may limit our ability to complete the most desirable Business Combination available to us or optimize our capital
structure. As a result, our obligations to redeem Public Shares for which redemption is requested and to pay the deferred underwriting
commissions may not allow us to complete the most desirable Business Combination or optimize our capital structure.
In addition, raising additional
third-party financing may involve dilutive equity issuances or the incurrence of indebtedness at higher than desirable levels. Furthermore,
this dilution would increase to the extent that the anti-dilution provisions of the Class B ordinary shares result in the issuance of
Class A Ordinary Shares on a greater than one-to-one basis upon conversion of the Class B ordinary shares at the time of our Business
Combination. The above considerations may limit our ability to complete the most desirable Business Combination available to us or optimize
our capital structure and may result in substantial dilution from your purchase of our Class A Ordinary Shares. The effect of this dilution
will be greater for shareholders who do not redeem. The amount of the deferred underwriting compensation payable to the underwriters will
not be adjusted for any shares that are redeemed in connection with an initial Business Combination, which may further dilute your investment.
The per-share amount we will distribute to shareholders who properly exercise their redemption rights will not be reduced by the deferred
underwriting compensation and after such redemptions, the per-share value of shares held by non-redeeming shareholders will reflect our
obligation to pay the deferred underwriting compensation. We may not be able to generate sufficient value from the completion of our initial
Business Combination in order to overcome the dilutive impact of these and other factors, and, accordingly, you may incur a net loss on
your investment. Please see “- Risks Relating to Our Securities - The nominal purchase price paid by our
Sponsor for the Founder Shares may result in significant dilution to the implied value of your Public Shares upon the consummation of
our initial Business Combination, and our Sponsor is likely to make a substantial profit on its investment in us in the event we consummate
an initial Business Combination even if the Business Combination causes the trading price of our ordinary shares to materially decline .”
The ability of our Public Shareholders to
exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares could increase the probability that our initial Business Combination
would be unsuccessful and that you would have to wait for liquidation in order to redeem your shares.
If our initial Business Combination
agreement requires us to use a portion of the cash in the Trust Account to pay the purchase price, or requires us to have a minimum amount
of cash at closing, the probability that our initial Business Combination would be unsuccessful is increased. If our initial Business
Combination is unsuccessful, you would not receive your pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account until we liquidate the
Trust Account. If you are in need of immediate liquidity, you could attempt to sell your shares in the open market; however, at such time
our shares may trade at a discount to the pro rata amount per share in the Trust Account. In either situation, you may suffer a
material loss on your investment or lose the benefit of funds expected in connection with your exercise of redemption rights until we
liquidate or you are able to sell your shares in the open market.
15
The requirement that we complete our initial
Business Combination within the Completion Window may give potential target businesses leverage over us in negotiating a Business Combination
and may limit the time we have in which to conduct due diligence on potential Business Combination targets, in particular as we approach
our dissolution deadline, which could undermine our ability to complete our initial Business Combination on terms that would produce value
for our shareholders.
Any potential target business
with which we enter into negotiations concerning a Business Combination will be aware that we must complete our initial Business Combination
within the Completion Window. Consequently, such target business may obtain leverage over us in negotiating a Business Combination, knowing
that if we do not complete our initial Business Combination with that particular target business, we may be unable to complete our initial
Business Combination with any target business. This risk will increase as we get closer to the timeframe described above. In addition,
we may have limited time to conduct due diligence and may enter into our initial Business Combination on terms that we would have rejected
upon a more comprehensive investigation. The length of time it may take us to complete our diligence and negotiate a Business Combination
may reduce the amount of time available for us to ultimately complete an initial Business Combination should such diligence or negotiations
not lead to a consummated initial Business Combination.
Our search for an initial business combination,
and any target business with which we may ultimately consummate an initial business combination, may be materially adversely affected
by current global geopolitical conditions resulting from the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict and the recent escalation of conflict in
the Middle East and Southwest Asia as well as volatility in the debt and equity markets.
United States and global markets
are experiencing volatility and disruption following the geopolitical instability resulting from the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict and
the recent escalation of conflict in the Middle East and Southwest Asia. In response to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization (“NATO”) deployed additional military forces to eastern Europe, and the United States, the United
Kingdom, the European Union and other countries have announced various sanctions and restrictive actions against Russia, Belarus and related
individuals and entities, including the removal of certain financial institutions from the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication
(SWIFT) payment system. Certain countries, including the United States, have also provided and may continue to provide military aid or
other assistance to Ukraine and to Israel, or have undertaken or will undertake military strikes in Southwest Asia, increasing geopolitical
tensions among a number of nations. The invasion of Ukraine by Russia and the escalation of conflict in the Middle East and Southwest
Asia and the resulting measures that have been taken, and could be taken in the future, by NATO, the United States, the United Kingdom,
the European Union, Israel and its neighboring states and other countries have created global security concerns that could have a lasting
impact on regional and global economies. Although the length and impact of the ongoing conflicts are highly unpredictable, they could
lead to market disruptions, including significant volatility in commodity prices, credit and capital markets, as well as supply chain
interruptions and increased cyber-attacks against U.S. companies. Additionally, any resulting sanctions could adversely affect the global
economy and financial markets and lead to instability and lack of liquidity in capital markets.
Any of the above mentioned
factors, or any other negative impact on the global economy, capital markets or other geopolitical conditions resulting from the Russian
invasion of Ukraine, the escalation of conflict in the Middle East and Southwest Asia and subsequent sanctions or related actions, may
lead to increased volume and price volatility for publicly traded securities or could adversely affect our search for an initial business
combination by adversely affecting the operations or financial condition of potential target companies, any of which could make it more
difficult for us to identify a business combination target and consummate an initial business combination on acceptable commercial terms,
or at all.
The extent and duration of
the ongoing conflicts, resulting sanctions and any related market disruptions are impossible to predict, but could be substantial, particularly
if current or new sanctions continue for an extended period of time or if geopolitical tensions result in expanded military operations
on a global scale. Any such disruptions may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this section. If
these disruptions or other matters of global concern continue for an extensive period of time, our ability to consummate an initial business
combination may be materially adversely affected.
16
In addition, our ability to
consummate a transaction may be dependent on the ability to raise equity and debt financing which may be impacted by certain events, including
as a result of increased market volatility, decreased market liquidity and third-party financing being unavailable on terms acceptable
to us or at all.
We may not be able to complete our initial
Business Combination within the Completion Window, in which case we would cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up and
we would redeem our Public Shares and liquidate.
We may not be able to find
a suitable target business and complete our initial Business Combination within the Completion Window. Our ability to complete our initial
Business Combination may be negatively impacted by general market conditions, volatility in the capital and debt markets and the other
risks described herein. If we have not completed our initial Business Combination within such time period, we will: as promptly as reasonably
possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem the Public Shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the
aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account (which interest
shall be net of taxes payable and up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then outstanding Public
Shares, which redemption will constitute full and complete payment and completely extinguish Public Shareholders’ rights as shareholders
(including the right to receive further liquidating distributions or other distributions, if any), subject to our obligations under Cayman
Islands law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law.
We may decide not to extend the term we
have to consummate our initial Business Combination, in which case we would redeem our Public Shares, and the warrants may be worthless.
We have until the end of the
Completion Window to consummate our initial Business Combination. If we anticipate that we may be unable to consummate our initial Business
Combination within such period, we may seek shareholder approval to amend our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association
to extend the date by which we must consummate our initial Business Combination. However, we may decide not to seek to extend the date
by which we must consummate our initial Business Combination. If we do not seek to extend the date by which we must consummate our initial
Business Combination, and we are unable to consummate our initial Business Combination within the applicable time period, we will, as
promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem the Public Shares for a pro rata portion of the
funds held in the Trust Account, subject to our obligations under Cayman Islands law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements
of other applicable law. In such event, the warrants may be worthless.
If we seek shareholder approval of our initial
Business Combination, our Sponsor, initial shareholders, directors, executive officers, advisors and their affiliates may elect to purchase
shares or Public Warrants from Public Shareholders, which may influence a vote on a proposed Business Combination and reduce the public
“float” of our securities.
If we seek shareholder approval
of our initial Business Combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our initial Business Combination pursuant to
the tender offer rules, our Sponsor, initial shareholders, directors, executive officers, advisors or their affiliates may purchase Public
Shares or warrants in privately negotiated transactions or in the open market either prior to or following the completion of our initial
Business Combination, although they are under no obligation to do so. Any such price per share may be different than the amount per share
a Public Shareholder would receive if it elected to redeem its shares in connection with our initial Business Combination. Such a purchase
may include a contractual acknowledgment that such shareholder, although still the record holder of our shares, is no longer the beneficial
owner thereof and therefore agrees not to exercise its redemption rights.
In the event that our Sponsor,
initial shareholders, directors, executive officers, advisors or their affiliates purchase shares in privately negotiated transactions
from Public Shareholders who have already elected to exercise their redemption rights, such selling shareholders would be required to
revoke their prior elections to redeem their shares. It is intended that, if Rule 10b-18 would apply to purchases by Sponsor, initial
shareholders, directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates, then such purchases will comply with Rule 10b-18 under the Exchange
Act, to the extent it applies, which provides a safe harbor for purchases made under certain conditions, including with respect to timing,
pricing and volume of purchases.
17
Additionally, at any time
at or prior to our initial Business Combination, subject to applicable securities laws (including with respect to material nonpublic information),
our Sponsor, initial shareholders, directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates may enter into transactions with investors and others
to provide them with incentives to acquire Public Shares, vote their Public Shares in favor of our initial Business Combination or not
redeem their Public Shares. However, they have no current commitments, plans or intentions to engage in such transactions and have not
formulated any terms or conditions for any such transactions. None of the funds in the Trust Account will be used to purchase Public Shares,
rights or warrants in such transactions.
The purpose of any such transactions
could be to (i) increase the likelihood of obtaining shareholder approval of the Business Combination, (ii) reduce the number of Public
Warrants outstanding and/or increase the likelihood of approval on any matters submitted to the Public Warrant holders for approval in
connection with our initial Business Combination or (iii) satisfy a closing condition in an agreement with a target that requires us to
have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash at the closing of our initial Business Combination, where it appears that such requirement
would otherwise not be met. Any such purchases of our securities may result in the completion of our Business Combination that may not
otherwise have been possible.
In addition, if such purchases
are made, the public “float” of our securities may be reduced and the number of beneficial holders of our securities may be
reduced, which may make it difficult to maintain or obtain the quotation, listing or trading of our securities on a national securities
exchange. Any such purchases will be reported pursuant to Section 13 and Section 16 of the Exchange Act to the extent such purchasers
are subject to such reporting requirements. Additionally, in the event our Sponsor, initial shareholders, directors, officers, advisors
and their affiliates were to purchase Public Shares or warrants from Public Shareholders, such purchases would be structured in compliance
with the requirements of Rule 14e-5 under the Exchange Act including, in pertinent part, through adherence to the following:
● our registration statement/proxy statement filed for our
Business Combination transaction would disclose the possibility that our Sponsor, initial shareholders, directors, officers, advisors
and their affiliates may purchase Public Shares or warrants from Public Shareholders outside the redemption process, along with the purpose
of such purchases;
● if our Sponsor, initial shareholders, directors, officers,
advisors and their affiliates were to purchase Public Shares or warrants from Public Shareholders, they would do so at a price no higher
than the price offered through our redemption process;
● our registration statement/proxy statement filed for our
Business Combination transaction would include a representation that any of our securities purchased by our Sponsor, initial shareholders,
directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates would not be voted in favor of approving the Business Combination transaction;
● our Sponsor, initial shareholders, directors, officers, advisors
and their affiliates would not possess any redemption rights with respect to our securities or, if they do acquire and possess redemption
rights, they would waive such rights; and
● we would disclose in a Form 8-K, before our security holder
meeting to approve the Business Combination transaction, the following material items:
● the amount of our securities purchased outside of the redemption
offer by our Sponsor, initial shareholders, directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates, along with the purchase price;
● the purpose of the purchases by our Sponsor, initial shareholders,
directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates;
● the impact, if any, of the purchases by our Sponsor, initial
shareholders, directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates on the likelihood that the Business Combination transaction will be
approved;
● the identities of our security holders who sold to our Sponsor,
initial shareholders, directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates (if not purchased on the open market) or the nature of our security
holders (e.g., 5% security holders) who sold to our Sponsor, initial shareholders, directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates;
and
● the number of our securities for which we have received redemption
requests pursuant to our redemption offer.
18
If a shareholder fails to receive notice
of our offer to redeem our Public Shares in connection with our initial Business Combination, or fails to comply with the procedures for
tendering its shares, such shares may not be redeemed.
We will comply with the proxy
rules or tender offer rules, as applicable, when conducting redemptions in connection with our initial Business Combination. Despite our
compliance with these rules, if a shareholder fails to receive our proxy materials or tender offer documents, as applicable, such shareholder
may not become aware of the opportunity to redeem its shares. In addition, proxy materials or tender offer documents, as applicable, that
we will furnish to holders of our Public Shares in connection with our initial Business Combination will describe the various procedures
that must be complied with in order to validly tender or submit Public Shares for redemption. For example, we intend to require our Public
Shareholders seeking to exercise their redemption rights, whether they are record holders or hold their shares in “street name,”
to, at the holder’s option, either deliver their share certificates to our transfer agent, or to deliver their shares to our transfer
agent electronically prior to the date set forth in the proxy materials or tender offer documents, as applicable. In the case of proxy
materials, this date may be up to two business days prior to the scheduled vote on the proposal to approve the initial Business Combination.
In addition, if we conduct redemptions in connection with a shareholder vote, we intend to require a Public Shareholder seeking redemption
of its Public Shares to also submit a written request for redemption to our transfer agent two business days prior to the scheduled vote
in which the name of the beneficial owner of such shares is included. In the event that a shareholder fails to comply with these or any
other procedures disclosed in the proxy or tender offer materials, as applicable, its shares may not be redeemed. See the section of this
Form 10-K entitled “ Business – Manner of Conducting Redemptions .”
You will not be entitled to protections
normally afforded to investors of other blank check companies subject to Rule 419 of the Securities Act.
Since the net proceeds of
the IPO and the sale of the Private Placement Warrants are intended to be used to complete one or more initial Business Combinations with
a target business or businesses that have not been selected, we may be deemed to be a “blank check” company under the United States
securities laws. However, we are exempt from rules promulgated by the SEC to protect investors in blank check companies, such as Rule 419.
Accordingly, investors will not be afforded the benefits or protections of those rules. Among other things, this means we will have a
longer period of time to complete our initial Business Combinations than do companies subject to Rule 419. Moreover, if the IPO had
been subject to Rule 419, that rule would prohibit the release of any interest earned on funds held in the Trust Account to us unless
and until the funds in the Trust Account were released to us or in connection with our completion of an initial Business Combination.
If we seek shareholder approval of our initial
Business Combination and we do not conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules, and if you or a “group” of shareholders
are deemed to hold in excess of 15% of our Class A Ordinary Shares, you may lose the ability to redeem all such shares in excess of 15%
of our Class A Ordinary Shares.
If we seek shareholder approval
of our initial Business Combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our initial Business Combination pursuant to
the tender offer rules, our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that a Public Shareholder, together with
any affiliate of such shareholder or any other person with whom such shareholder is acting in concert or as a “group” (as
defined under Section 13 of the Exchange Act), will be restricted from seeking redemption rights with respect to more than an aggregate
of 15% of the shares sold in the IPO without our prior consent, which we refer to as the “Excess Shares.” However, we would
not be restricting our shareholders’ ability to vote all of their shares (including Excess Shares) for or against our initial Business
Combination.
Your inability to redeem the
Excess Shares will reduce your influence over our ability to complete our initial Business Combination and you could suffer a material
loss on your investment in us if you sell Excess Shares in open market transactions. Additionally, you will not receive redemption distributions
with respect to the Excess Shares if we complete our initial Business Combination. And as a result, you will continue to hold that number
of shares exceeding 15% and, in order to dispose of such shares, would be required to sell your shares in open market transactions, potentially
at a loss.
19
Because of our limited resources and the
significant competition for Business Combination opportunities, it may be more difficult for us to complete our initial Business Combination.
If we are unable to complete our initial Business Combination, our Public Shareholders may receive only their pro rata portion of the
funds in the Trust Account that are available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
We expect to encounter competition
from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including private investors (which may be individuals or investment partnerships),
other blank check companies and other entities, domestic and international, competing for the types of businesses we intend to acquire.
Many of these individuals and entities are well-established and have extensive experience in identifying and effecting, directly or indirectly,
acquisitions of companies operating in or providing services to various industries. Many of these competitors possess similar or greater
technical, human and other resources to ours or more local industry knowledge than we do and our financial resources are relatively limited
when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. While we believe there are numerous target businesses we could potentially acquire
with the net proceeds of the IPO and the sale of the Private Placement Warrants, our ability to compete with respect to the acquisition
of certain target businesses that are sizable will be limited by our available financial resources. This inherent competitive limitation
gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of certain target businesses. Furthermore, we are obligated to offer holders of
our Public Shares the right to redeem their shares for cash at the time of our initial Business Combination in conjunction with a shareholder
vote or via a tender offer. Target companies will be aware that this may reduce the resources available to us for our initial Business
Combination. Any of these obligations may place us at a competitive disadvantage in successfully negotiating a Business Combination. If
we are unable to complete our initial Business Combination, our Public Shareholders may receive only their pro rata portion of
the funds in the Trust Account that are available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
As the number of special purpose acquisition
companies evaluating targets increases, attractive targets may become scarcer and there may be more competition for attractive targets.
This could increase the cost of our initial Business Combination and could even result in our inability to find a target or to consummate
an initial Business Combination.
In recent years, the number
of special purpose acquisition companies that have been formed has increased substantially. Many potential targets for special purpose
acquisition companies have already entered into an initial Business Combination, and there are still many special purpose acquisition
companies preparing for an IPO, as well as many such companies currently in registration. As a result, at times, fewer attractive targets
may be available to consummate an initial Business Combination.
In addition, because there
are more special purpose acquisition companies seeking to enter into an initial Business Combination with available targets, the competition
for available targets with attractive fundamentals or business models may increase, which could cause targets companies to demand improved
financial terms. Attractive deals could also become scarcer for other reasons, such as economic or industry sector downturns, geopolitical
tensions, or increases in the cost of additional capital needed to close Business Combinations or operate targets post-Business Combination.
This could increase the cost of, delay or otherwise complicate or frustrate our ability to find and consummate an initial Business Combination,
and may result in our inability to consummate an initial Business Combination on terms favorable to our investors altogether.
20
If the net proceeds of the IPO not being
held in the Trust Account are insufficient to allow us to operate for at least the duration of the Completion Window, it could limit the
amount available to fund our search for a target business or businesses and complete our initial Business Combination, and we will depend
on loans from our Sponsor or management team to fund our search and to complete our initial Business Combination.
As of December 31, 2024, $665,430
was available to us outside the Trust Account to fund our working capital requirements. We believe that the funds available to us outside
of the Trust Account will be sufficient to allow us to operate for at least the duration of the Completion Window; however, we cannot
assure you that our estimate is accurate. Of the funds available to us, we could use a portion of the funds available to us to pay fees
to consultants to assist us with our search for a target business. We could also use a portion of the funds as a down payment or to fund
a “no-shop” provision (a provision in letters of intent or merger agreements designed to keep target businesses from “shopping”
around for transactions with other companies or investors on terms more favorable to such target businesses) with respect to a particular
proposed Business Combination, although we do not have any current intention to do so. If we entered into a letter of intent or merger
agreement where we paid for the right to receive exclusivity from a target business and were subsequently required to forfeit such funds
(whether as a result of our breach or otherwise), we might not have sufficient funds to continue searching for, or conduct due diligence
with respect to, a target business.
If we are required to seek
additional capital, we would need to borrow funds from our Sponsor, management team or other third parties to operate or may be forced
to liquidate. Neither our Sponsor, members of our management team nor any of their affiliates is under any obligation to advance funds
to us in such circumstances. Any such advances would be repaid only from funds held outside the Trust Account or from funds released to
us upon completion of our initial Business Combination. Up to $1,500,000 of such loans may be convertible into Private Placement Warrants
at a price of $1.00 per warrant, at the option of the lender. The warrants would be identical to the Private Placement Warrants, including
as to exercisability and exercise price. Prior to the completion of our initial Business Combination, we do not expect to seek loans from
parties other than our Sponsor or an affiliate of our Sponsor, as we do not believe third parties will be willing to loan such funds and
provide a waiver against any and all rights to seek access to funds in our Trust Account. If we are unable to complete our initial Business
Combination because we do not have sufficient funds available to us, we will be forced to liquidate the Trust Account. Consequently, our
Public Shareholders may only receive an estimated $10.00 per share, or possibly less, on our redemption of our Public Shares, and our
warrants will expire worthless.
If third parties bring claims against us,
the proceeds held in the Trust Account could be reduced and the per- share redemption amount received by shareholders may be less than
$10.00 per share.
Our placing of funds in the
Trust Account may not protect those funds from third party claims against us. Although we will seek to have all vendors, service providers
(except for our independent registered public accounting firm), prospective target businesses and other entities with which we do business
execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the Trust Account for the
benefit of our Public Shareholders, such parties may not execute such agreements, or even if they execute such agreements they may not
be prevented from bringing claims against the Trust Account, including, but not limited to, fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary
responsibility or other similar claims, as well as claims challenging the enforceability of the waiver, in each case in order to gain
advantage with respect to a claim against our assets, including the funds held in the Trust Account. If any third party refuses to execute
an agreement waiving such claims to the monies held in the Trust Account, our management will consider whether competitive alternatives
are reasonably available to us and will only enter into an agreement with such third party if management believes that such third party’s
engagement would be in the best interests of the company under the circumstances. The underwriters of the initial public as well as our
registered independent public accounting firm will not execute agreements with us waiving such claims to the monies held in the Trust
Account.
Examples of possible instances
where we may engage a third party that refuses to execute a waiver include the engagement of a third party consultant whose particular
expertise or skills are believed by management to be significantly superior to those of other consultants that would agree to execute
a waiver or in cases where management is unable to find a service provider willing to execute a waiver. In addition, there is no guarantee
that such entities will agree to waive any claims they may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts
or agreements with us and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason. Upon redemption of our Public Shares, if we
are unable to complete our initial Business Combination within the prescribed timeframe, or upon the exercise of a redemption right in
connection with our initial Business Combination, we will be required to provide for payment of claims of creditors that were not waived
that may be brought against us within the 10 years following redemption.
21
Accordingly, the per-share
redemption amount received by Public Shareholders could be less than the $10.00 per Public Share initially held in the Trust Account,
due to claims of such creditors. Pursuant to the letter agreement, our Sponsor has agreed that it will be liable to us if and to the extent
any claims by a third party for services rendered or products sold to us (except for the company’s independent auditors), or a prospective
target business with which we have entered into a written letter of intent, confidentiality or other similar agreement or Business Combination
agreement, reduce the amount of funds in the Trust Account to below the lesser of (i) $10.00 per Public Share and (ii) the actual amount
per Public Share held in the Trust Account as of the date of the liquidation of the Trust Account, if less than $10.00 per Public Share
due to reductions in the value of the trust assets, less taxes payable, provided that such liability will not apply to any claims
by a third party or prospective target business who executed a waiver of any and all rights to the monies held in the Trust Account (whether
or not such waiver is enforceable) nor will it apply to any claims under our indemnity of the underwriters of the IPO against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. However, we have not asked our Sponsor to reserve for such indemnification
obligations, nor have we independently verified whether our Sponsor has sufficient funds to satisfy its indemnity obligations and we believe
that our Sponsor’s only assets are securities of our company. Therefore, we cannot assure you that our Sponsor would be able to
satisfy those obligations. As a result, if any such claims were successfully made against the Trust Account, the funds available for our
initial Business Combination and redemptions could be reduced to less than $10.00 per Public Share. In such event, we may not be able
to complete our initial Business Combination, and you would receive such lesser amount per share in connection with any redemption of
your Public Shares. None of our officers or directors will indemnify us for claims by third parties including, without limitation, claims
by vendors and prospective target businesses.
Our directors may decide not to enforce
the indemnification obligations of our Sponsor, resulting in a reduction in the amount of funds in the Trust Account available for distribution
to our Public Shareholders.
In the event that the proceeds
in the Trust Account are reduced below the lesser of (i) $10.00 per share and the actual amount per Public Share held in the Trust Account
as of the date of the liquidation of the Trust Account if less than $10.00 per Public Share due to reductions in the value of the trust
assets, in each case less taxes payable, and our Sponsor asserts that it is unable to satisfy its obligations or that it has no indemnification
obligations related to a particular claim, our independent directors would determine whether to take legal action against our Sponsor
to enforce its indemnification obligations. While we currently expect that our independent directors would take legal action on our behalf
against our Sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations to us, it is possible that our independent directors in exercising their
business judgment and subject to their fiduciary duties may choose not to do so in any particular instance. If our independent directors
choose not to enforce these indemnification obligations, the amount of funds in the Trust Account available for distribution to our Public
Shareholders may be reduced below $10.00 per share.
If, after we distribute the proceeds in
the Trust Account to our Public Shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or winding up petition
is filed against us that is not dismissed, a bankruptcy or insolvency court may seek to recover such proceeds, and the members of our
board of directors may be viewed as having breached their fiduciary duties to our creditors, thereby exposing the members of our board
of directors and us to claims of punitive damages.
If, after we distribute the
proceeds in the Trust Account to our Public Shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or
winding up petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, any distributions received by shareholders could be viewed under applicable
debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy or insolvency laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent conveyance.”
As a result, a bankruptcy or insolvency court could seek to recover some or all amounts received by our shareholders. In addition, our
board of directors may be viewed as having breached its fiduciary duty to our creditors and/or having acted in bad faith, by paying Public
Shareholders from the Trust Account prior to addressing the claims of creditors, thereby exposing itself and us to claims of punitive
damages.
If, before distributing the proceeds in
the Trust Account to our Public Shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or winding up petition
is filed against us that is not dismissed, the claims of creditors in such proceeding may have priority over the claims of our shareholders
and the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by our shareholders in connection with our liquidation may be reduced.
If, before distributing the
proceeds in the Trust Account to our Public Shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or
winding up petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the proceeds held in the Trust Account could be subject to applicable bankruptcy
or insolvency law, and may be included in our bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties with priority over the claims
of our shareholders. To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the Trust Account, the per-share amount that would otherwise be received
by our shareholders in connection with our liquidation may be reduced.
22
Changes in laws or regulations, or a failure
to comply with any laws and regulations, may adversely affect our business, including our ability to negotiate and complete our initial
business combination, and results of operations.
We are subject to laws and
regulations enacted by national, regional and local governments. In particular, we will be required to comply with certain SEC and other
legal requirements and numerous complex tax laws. Compliance with, and monitoring of, applicable laws and regulations may be difficult,
time consuming and costly. Those laws and regulations and their interpretation and application may also change from time to time and those
changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, investments and results of operations. In addition, a failure to comply
with applicable laws or regulations, as interpreted and applied, could have a material adverse effect on our business, including our ability
to negotiate and complete our initial business combination, and results of operations.
On January 24, 2024, the
SEC adopted a series of new rules relating to SPACs (the “SPAC Rules”) requiring, among other items, (i) additional disclosures
relating to SPAC business combination transactions; (ii) additional disclosures relating to dilution and to conflicts of interest
involving sponsors and their affiliates in both SPAC initial public offerings and de-SPAC transactions; (iii) the use of projections
by SPACs in SEC filings in connection with proposed business combination transactions; and (iv) both the SPAC and the target company’s
status as co-registrants on de-SPAC registration statements.
In addition, the SEC’s
adopting release provided guidance describing circumstances in which a SPAC could become subject to regulation under the Investment Company
Act, including its duration, asset composition, business purpose, and the activities of the SPAC and its management team in furtherance
of such goals.
Compliance with the SPAC Rules
and related guidance may increase the costs of and the time needed to negotiate and complete an initial business combination and may constrain
the circumstances under which we could complete an initial business combination.
If we are deemed to be an investment company
under the Investment Company Act, we may be required to institute burdensome compliance requirements and our activities may be restricted,
which may make it difficult for us to complete our initial business combination.
As described in the risk factor
above entitled “ Changes in laws or regulations, or a failure to comply with any laws and regulations, may adversely affect our
business, including our ability to negotiate and complete our initial business combination, and results of operations ,” the
SEC’s adopting release with respect to the SPAC Rules provided guidance describing the extent to which SPACs could become subject
to regulation under the Investment Company Act and the regulations thereunder. Whether a SPAC is an investment company will be a question
of facts and circumstances. If our facts and circumstances change over time, we will update our disclosure to reflect how those changes
impact the risk that we may be considered to be operating as an unregistered investment company. We can give no assurance that a claim
will not be made that we have been operating as an unregistered investment company.
If we are deemed to be an investment
company under the Investment Company Act, we may have to change our operations, wind down our operations, or register as an investment
company under the Investment Company Act. Our activities may be restricted, including:
● restrictions on the nature of our investments; and
● restrictions on the issuance of securities, each of which
may make it difficult for us to complete our initial Business Combination.
23
● In addition, we may have imposed upon us burdensome requirements,
including:
● registration as an investment company;
● adoption of a specific form of corporate structure; and
● reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy and disclosure requirements
and other rules and regulations.
In order not to be regulated
as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, unless we can qualify for an exclusion, we must ensure that we are engaged
primarily in a business other than investing, reinvesting or trading in securities and that our activities do not include investing, reinvesting,
owning, holding or trading “investment securities” constituting more than 40% of our total assets (exclusive of U.S. government
securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. Our business will be to identify and complete a Business Combination and thereafter
to operate the post-transaction business or assets for the long term. We do not intend to spend a considerable amount of time actively
managing the assets in the Trust Account for the primary purpose of achieving investment returns. We do not plan to buy businesses or
assets with a view to resale or profit from their resale. We do not plan to buy unrelated businesses or assets or to be a passive investor.
We do not believe that our
anticipated principal activities will subject us to the Investment Company Act. To this end, the proceeds held in the Trust Account may
only be held as cash, including in demand deposit accounts at a bank, or invested in U.S. “government securities” within
the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act having a maturity of 185 days or less or in money market
funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 promulgated under the Investment Company Act which invest only in direct U.S. government
treasury obligations; the holding of these assets in this form is intended to be temporary and for the sole purpose of facilitating the
intended Business Combination and may at any time be held as cash or cash items, including in demand deposit accounts at a bank. Pursuant
to the trust agreement, the trustee is not permitted to invest in other securities or assets. By restricting the investment of the proceeds
to these instruments, and by having a business plan targeted at acquiring and growing businesses for the long term (rather than on buying
and selling businesses in the manner of a merchant bank or private equity fund), we intend to avoid being deemed an “investment
company” within the meaning of the Investment Company Act. Investing in our securities is not intended for persons who are seeking
a return on investments in government securities or investment securities. The Trust Account is intended as a holding place for funds
pending the earliest to occur of: (i) the completion of our initial Business Combination; (ii) the redemption of any public
shares properly submitted in connection with an amendment of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association (A) to
modify the substance or timing of our obligation to provide for the redemption of our public shares in connection with an initial Business
Combination or to redeem 100% of our public shares if we have not consummated our initial Business Combination within the completion window
or (B) with respect to any other material provisions relating to shareholders’ rights or pre-initial Business Combination
activity; or (iii) absent an initial Business Combination within the completion window, our return of the funds held in the Trust
Account to our public shareholders as part of our redemption of the public shares. If we do not invest the proceeds as discussed above,
we may be deemed to be subject to the Investment Company Act.
Further, under the subjective
test of a “investment company” pursuant to Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act, even if the funds deposited
in the Trust Account were invested in the assets discussed above (U.S. government securities or money market funds registered under
the Investment Company Act), such assets, other than cash, are “securities” for purposes of the Investment Company Act and,
therefore, nevertheless, there is a risk that we could be deemed an unregistered investment company and subject to the Investment Company
Act at any time.
In the adopting release for
the SPAC Rules, the SEC provided guidance that a SPAC’s potential status as an “investment company” depends on a variety
of factors, such as a SPAC’s duration, asset composition, business purpose and activities and “is a question of facts and
circumstances” requiring individualized analysis. If we were deemed to be an unregistered investment company and subject to compliance
with and regulation under the Investment Company Act, we would be subject to additional regulatory burdens and expenses for which we have
not allotted funds. Unless we are able to modify our activities so that we would not be deemed an investment company, we would either
register as an investment company or wind-down and abandon our efforts to complete a Business Combination and instead liquidate the
Trust Account. As a result, our public shareholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account that are
available for distribution to public shareholders and would be unable to realize the potential benefits of an initial Business Combination,
including the possible appreciation of the combined company’s securities.
24
Our shareholders may be held liable for
claims by third parties against us to the extent of distributions received by them upon redemption of their shares.
If we are forced to enter into
an insolvent liquidation, any distributions received by shareholders could be viewed as an unlawful payment if it was proved that immediately
following the date on which the distribution was made, we were unable to pay our debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business.
As a result, a liquidator could seek to recover some or all amounts received by our shareholders. Furthermore, our directors may be viewed
as having breached their fiduciary duties to us or our creditors and/or may have acted in bad faith, thereby exposing themselves and our
company to claims, by paying Public Shareholders from the Trust Account prior to addressing the claims of creditors. We cannot assure
you that claims will not be brought against us for these reasons. We and our directors and officers who knowingly and willfully authorized
or permitted any distribution to be paid out of our share premium account while we were unable to pay our debts as they fall due in the
ordinary course of business would be guilty of an offence and may be liable to a fine of approximately $18,293 and to imprisonment for
five years in the Cayman Islands.
We may not hold an annual general meeting
until after the consummation of our initial Business Combination, which could delay the opportunity for our shareholders to appoint directors.
In accordance with the Nasdaq’s
corporate governance requirements, we are not required to hold an annual general meeting until no later than one year after our first
fiscal year end following our listing on the Nasdaq. There is no requirement under the Companies Act for us to hold annual or extraordinary
general meetings to appoint directors. Until we hold an annual general meeting, Public Shareholders may not be afforded the opportunity
to appoint directors and to discuss company affairs with management. Our board of directors is divided into three classes with only one
class of directors being elected in each year and each class (except for those directors appointed prior to our first annual general meeting)
serving a three-year term. In addition, as holders of our Class A Ordinary Shares, our Public Shareholders will not have the right to
vote on the election of directors until after the consummation of our initial Business Combination.
Because we are neither limited to evaluating
a target business in a particular industry sector nor have we selected any specific target businesses with which to pursue our initial
Business Combination, you will be unable to ascertain the merits or risks of any particular target business’s operations.
Our efforts to identify a prospective
initial Business Combination target will not be limited to a particular industry, sector or geographic region. Our amended and restated
memorandum and articles of association prohibit us from effectuating a Business Combination solely with another blank check company or
similar company with nominal operations. Because we have not yet selected any specific target business with respect to a Business Combination,
there is no basis to evaluate the possible merits or risks of any particular target business’s operations, results of operations,
cash flows, liquidity, financial condition or prospects.
To the extent we complete our
initial Business Combination, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in the business operations with which we combine. For example,
if we combine with a financially unstable business or an entity lacking an established record of sales or earnings, we may be affected
by the risks inherent in the business and operations of a financially unstable or a development stage entity. In recent years, a number
of target businesses have underperformed financially post-Business Combination, There are no assurances that the target business with
which we consummate our initial Business Combination will perform as anticipated. Although our officers and directors will endeavor to
evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all of the
significant risk factors or that we will have adequate time to complete due diligence. Furthermore, some of these risks may be outside
of our control and leave us with no ability to control or reduce the chances that those risks will adversely impact a target business.
We also cannot assure you that an investment in our Units will ultimately prove to be more favorable to investors than a direct investment,
if such opportunity were available, in a Business Combination target.
25
Accordingly, any shareholders
or warrant holders who choose to remain shareholders or warrant holders following the Business Combination could suffer a reduction in
the value of their securities. Such shareholders or warrant holders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value unless they
are able to successfully claim that the reduction was due to the breach by our officers or directors of a duty of care or other fiduciary
duty owed to them, or if they are able to successfully bring a private claim under securities laws that the proxy materials or tender
offer documents, as applicable, relating to the Business Combination contained an actionable material misstatement or material omission.
Although we have identified general criteria
and guidelines that we believe are important in evaluating prospective target businesses, we may enter into our initial Business Combination
with a target that does not meet such criteria and guidelines, and as a result, the target business with which we enter into our initial
Business Combination may not have attributes entirely consistent with our general criteria and guidelines.
Although we have identified
general criteria and guidelines for evaluating prospective target businesses, it is possible that a target business with which we enter
into our initial Business Combination will not have all of these positive attributes. If we complete our initial Business Combination
with a target that does not meet some or all of these guidelines, such combination may not be as successful as a combination with a business
that does meet all of our general criteria and guidelines. In addition, if we announce a prospective Business Combination with a target
that does not meet our general criteria and guidelines, a greater number of shareholders may exercise their redemption rights, which may
make it difficult for us to meet any closing condition with a target business that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain
amount of cash. In addition, if shareholder approval of the transaction is required by law, or we decide to obtain shareholder approval
for business or other legal reasons, it may be more difficult for us to attain shareholder approval of our initial Business Combination
if the target business does not meet our general criteria and guidelines. If we are unable to complete our initial Business Combination,
our Public Shareholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account that are available for distribution
to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
We may not be required to obtain an opinion
from an independent investment banking firm or from a valuation or appraisal firm, and consequently, you may have no assurance from an
independent source that the consideration we are paying for the business is fair to our company from a financial point of view.
Unless we complete our initial
Business Combination with an affiliated (as defined in our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association) entity or our
board of directors cannot independently determine the fair market value of the target business or businesses (including with the assistance
of financial advisors), we are not required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm which is a member of FINRA
or from another independent entity that commonly renders valuation opinions that the consideration we are paying is fair to our company
from a financial point of view. If no opinion is obtained, our shareholders will be relying on the judgment of our board of directors,
who will determine fair market value based on standards generally accepted by the financial community. Such standards used will be disclosed
in our proxy materials or tender offer documents, as applicable, related to our initial Business Combination.
We may issue notes or other debt securities,
or otherwise incur substantial debt, to complete a Business Combination, which may adversely affect our leverage and financial condition
and thus negatively impact the value of our shareholders’ investment in us.
Although we have no commitments
as of the date of this Form 10-K to issue any notes or other debt securities, or to otherwise incur outstanding debt, we may choose to
incur substantial debt to complete our initial Business Combination. We and our officers have agreed that we will not incur any indebtedness
unless we have obtained from the lender a waiver of any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to the monies held in the Trust
Account. As such, no issuance of debt will affect the per share amount available for redemption from the Trust Account. Nevertheless,
the incurrence of debt could have a variety of negative effects, including:
● default and foreclosure on our assets if our operating revenues after an initial Business Combination
are insufficient to repay our debt obligations;
26
● acceleration of our obligations to repay the indebtedness even if we make all principal and interest payments
when due if we breach certain covenants that require the maintenance of certain financial ratios or reserves without a waiver or renegotiation
of that covenant;
● our immediate payment of all principal and accrued interest, if any, if the debt is payable on demand;
● our inability to obtain necessary additional financing if the debt contains covenants restricting our
ability to obtain such financing while the debt is outstanding;
● our inability to pay dividends on our Class A Ordinary Shares;
● using a substantial portion of our cash flow to pay principal and interest on our debt, which will reduce
the funds available for dividends on our Class A Ordinary Shares if declared, expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general
corporate purposes;
● limitations on our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in our business and in the industry
in which we operate;
● increased vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions and
adverse changes in government regulation; and
● limitations on our ability to borrow additional amounts for expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions,
debt service requirements, execution of our strategy and other purposes and other disadvantages compared to our competitors who have less
debt.
We may only be able to complete one Business
Combination with the proceeds of the IPO and the sale of the Private Placement Warrants, which will cause us to be solely dependent on
a single business which may have a limited number of products or services. This lack of diversification may negatively impact our operations
and profitability.
We may effectuate our initial
Business Combination with a single target business or multiple target businesses simultaneously or within a short period of time. However,
we may not be able to effectuate our initial Business Combination with more than one target business because of various factors, including
the existence of complex accounting issues and the requirement that we prepare and file pro forma financial statements with the
SEC that present operating results and the financial condition of several target businesses as if they had been operated on a combined
basis. By completing our initial Business Combination with only a single entity, our lack of diversification may subject us to numerous
economic, competitive and regulatory developments. Further, we would not be able to diversify our operations or benefit from the possible
spreading of risks or offsetting of losses, unlike other entities which may have the resources to complete several Business Combinations
in different industries or different areas of a single industry. Accordingly, the prospects for our success may be:
● solely dependent upon the performance of a single business, property or asset, or
● dependent upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes
or services.
This lack of diversification
may subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory risks, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact upon
the particular industry in which we may operate subsequent to our initial Business Combination.
We may attempt to simultaneously complete
Business Combinations with multiple prospective targets, which may hinder our ability to complete our initial Business Combination and
give rise to increased costs and risks that could negatively impact our operations and profitability.
If we determine to simultaneously
acquire several businesses that are owned by different sellers, we will need for each of such sellers to agree that our purchase of its
business is contingent on the simultaneous closings of the other Business Combinations, which may make it more difficult for us, and delay
our ability, to complete our initial Business Combination. With multiple Business Combinations, we could also face additional risks, including
additional burdens and costs with respect to possible multiple negotiations and due diligence investigations (if there are multiple sellers)
and the additional risks associated with the subsequent assimilation of the operations and services or products of the acquired companies
in a single operating business. If we are unable to adequately address these risks, it could negatively impact our profitability and results
of operations.
27
We may attempt to complete our initial Business
Combination with a private company about which little information is available, which may result in a Business Combination with a company
that is not as profitable as we suspected, if at all.
In pursuing our Business Combination
strategy, we may seek to effectuate our initial Business Combination with a privately held company. Very little public information generally
exists about private companies, and we could be required to make our decision on whether to pursue a potential initial Business Combination
on the basis of limited information, which may result in a Business Combination with a company that is not as profitable as we suspected,
if at all.
We do not have a specified maximum redemption
threshold. The absence of such a redemption threshold may make it possible for us to complete our initial Business Combination with which
a substantial majority of our shareholders do not agree.
Our amended and restated memorandum
and articles of association do not provide a specified maximum redemption threshold. In addition, our proposed initial Business Combination
may impose a minimum cash requirement for: (i) cash consideration to be paid to the target or its owners, (ii) cash for working capital
or other general corporate purposes or (iii) the retention of cash to satisfy other conditions. As a result, we may be able to complete
our initial Business Combination even though a substantial majority of our Public Shareholders do not agree with the transaction and have
redeemed their shares or, if we seek shareholder approval of our initial Business Combination and do not conduct redemptions in connection
with our initial Business Combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, have entered into privately negotiated agreements to sell their
shares to our Sponsor, officers, directors, advisors or any of their affiliates. In the event the aggregate cash consideration we would
be required to pay for all Class A Ordinary Shares that are validly submitted for redemption plus any amount required to satisfy cash
conditions pursuant to the terms of the proposed Business Combination exceed the aggregate amount of cash available to us, we will not
complete the Business Combination or redeem any shares in connection with such initial Business Combination, all Class A Ordinary Shares
submitted for redemption will be returned to the holders thereof, and we instead may search for an alternate Business Combination.
In order to effectuate an initial Business
Combination, special purpose acquisition companies have, in the recent past, amended various provisions of their charters and other governing
instruments, including their warrant agreements. We cannot assure you that we will not seek to amend our amended and restated memorandum
and articles of association or governing instruments in a manner that will make it easier for us to complete our initial Business Combination
that our shareholders may not support.
In order to effectuate a Business
Combination, special purpose acquisition companies have, in the recent past, amended various provisions of their charters and governing
instruments, including their warrant agreements. For example, special purpose acquisition companies have amended the definition of Business
Combination, increased redemption thresholds and extended the time to consummate an initial Business Combination and, with respect to
their warrants, amended their warrant agreements to require the warrants to be exchanged for cash and/or other securities. Certain amendments
to our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association requires a special resolution under Cayman Islands law, which requires
the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of our ordinary shares which are represented in person or by proxy and are voted at a general
meeting of the company, and amending our warrant agreement requires a vote of holders of at least 50% of the Public Warrants and, solely
with respect to any amendment to the terms of the Private Placement Warrants or any provision of the warrant agreement with respect to
the Private Placement Warrants, 50% of the number of the then outstanding Private Placement Warrants (including the vote or written consent
of Cantor). In addition, our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association require us to provide our Public Shareholders
with the opportunity to redeem their Public Shares for cash if we propose an amendment to our amended and restated memorandum and articles
of association (A) to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our Public Shares if we do not complete an initial
Business Combination within the Completion Window or (B) with respect to any other material provisions relating to shareholders’
rights or pre-initial Business Combination activity. To the extent any of such amendments would be deemed to fundamentally change the
nature of the securities offered through the registration statement filed in connection with our IPO, we would register, or seek an exemption
from registration for, the affected securities. We cannot assure you that we will not seek to amend our charter or governing instruments
or extend the time to consummate an initial Business Combination in order to effectuate our initial Business Combination.
28
The provisions of our amended and restated
memorandum and articles of association that relate to our pre- Business Combination activity (and corresponding provisions of the agreement
governing the release of funds from our Trust Account) may be amended with the approval of holders of not less than two-thirds of our
ordinary shares which are represented in person or by proxy and are voted at a general meeting of the company, which is a lower amendment
threshold than that of some other special purpose acquisition companies. It may be easier for us, therefore, to amend our amended and
restated memorandum and articles of association to facilitate the completion of an initial Business Combination that some of our shareholders
may not support.
Our amended and restated memorandum
and articles of association provide that any of its provisions related to pre-Business Combination activity (including the requirement
to deposit proceeds of the IPO and the private placement of warrants into the Trust Account and not release such amounts except in specified
circumstances, and to provide redemption rights to Public Shareholders as described herein) and corresponding provisions of the trust
agreement governing the release of funds from our Trust Account may be amended if approved by special resolution, under Cayman Islands
law passed by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of our ordinary shares which are represented in person or represented by proxy
and are voted at a general meeting of the company. Our initial shareholders, who collectively beneficially own 20% of our ordinary shares,
will participate in any vote to amend our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association and/or trust agreement and will
have the discretion to vote in any manner they choose. As a result, we may be able to amend the provisions of our amended and restated
memorandum and articles of association which govern our pre-Business Combination behavior more easily than some other special purpose
acquisition companies, and this may increase our ability to complete a Business Combination with which you do not agree. Our shareholders
may pursue remedies against us for any breach of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association.
Our Sponsor, officers and directors
have agreed, pursuant to a written agreement with us, that they will not propose any amendment to our amended and restated memorandum
and articles of association (A) to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to allow redemption in connection with our initial
Business Combination or to redeem 100% of our Public Shares if we do not complete our initial Business Combination within the Completion
Window or (B) with respect to any other material provisions relating to shareholders’ rights or pre-initial Business Combination
activity, unless we provide our Public Shareholders with the opportunity to redeem their Class A Ordinary Shares upon approval of any
such amendment at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, including interest
earned on the funds held in the Trust Account (which interest shall be net of taxes payable), divided by the number of then outstanding
Public Shares. Our shareholders are not parties to, or third-party beneficiaries of, these agreements and, as a result, will not have
the ability to pursue remedies against our Sponsor, officers or directors for any breach of these agreements. As a result, in the event
of a breach, our shareholders would need to pursue a shareholder derivative action, subject to applicable law.
Certain agreements entered into at the time
of our IPO may be amended without shareholder approval.
Each of the agreements we entered
into at the time of our IPO, other than the warrant agreement and the investment management trust agreement, may be amended without shareholder
approval. Such agreements are: the underwriting agreement; the letter agreement among us and our initial shareholders, Sponsor, officers
and directors; the registration rights agreement among us and our initial shareholders; the Private Placement Warrants purchase agreement
between us and our Sponsor; and the administrative services agreement among us, our Sponsor and an affiliate of our Sponsor. These agreements
contain various provisions that our Public Shareholders might deem to be material. For example, our letter agreement and the underwriting
agreement contain certain lock-up provisions with respect to the Founder Shares, Private Placement Warrants and other securities held
by our initial shareholders, Sponsor, officers and directors. Amendments to such agreements would require the consent of the applicable
parties thereto and would need to be approved by our board of directors, which may do so for a variety of reasons, including to facilitate
our initial Business Combination. While we do not expect our board of directors to approve any amendment to any of these agreements prior
to our initial Business Combination, it may be possible that our board of directors, in exercising its business judgment and subject to
its fiduciary duties, chooses to approve one or more amendments to any such agreement. Any amendment entered into in connection with the
consummation of our initial Business Combination will be disclosed in our proxy materials or tender offer documents, as applicable, related
to such initial Business Combination, and any other material amendment to any of our material agreements will be disclosed in a filing
with the SEC. Any such amendments would not require approval from our shareholders, may result in the completion of our initial Business
Combination that may not otherwise have been possible, and may have an adverse effect on the value of an investment in our securities.
For example, amendments to the lock-up provision discussed above may result in our initial shareholders selling their securities earlier
than they would otherwise be permitted, which may have an adverse effect on the price of our securities.
29
We may be unable to obtain additional financing
to complete our initial Business Combination or to fund the operations and growth of a target business, which could compel us to restructure
or abandon a particular Business Combination.
We have not selected any specific
Business Combination target but intend to target businesses with enterprise values that are greater than we could acquire with the net
proceeds of the IPO and the sale of the Private Placement Warrants. As a result, if the cash portion of the purchase price exceeds the
amount available from the Trust Account, net of amounts needed to satisfy any redemption by Public Shareholders, we may be required to
seek additional financing to complete such proposed initial Business Combination. We cannot assure you that such financing will be available
on acceptable terms, if at all. To the extent that additional financing proves to be unavailable when needed to complete our initial Business
Combination, we would be compelled to either restructure the transaction or abandon that particular Business Combination and seek an alternative
target business candidate. Further, we may be required to obtain additional financing in connection with the closing of our initial Business
Combination for general corporate purposes, including for maintenance or expansion of operations of the post-transaction businesses, the
payment of principal or interest due on indebtedness incurred in completing our initial Business Combination, or to fund the purchase
of other companies. If we are unable to complete our initial Business Combination, our Public Shareholders may only receive their pro
rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account that are available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire
worthless. In addition, even if we do not need additional financing to complete our initial Business Combination, we may require such
financing to fund the operations or growth of the target business. The failure to secure additional financing could have a material adverse
effect on the continued development or growth of the target business. None of our officers, directors or shareholders is required to provide
any financing to us in connection with or after our initial Business Combination.
Our initial shareholders control a substantial
interest in us and thus may exert a substantial influence on actions requiring a shareholder vote, potentially in a manner that you do
not support.
Our initial shareholders own
20% of our issued and outstanding ordinary. Accordingly, they may exert a substantial influence on actions requiring a shareholder vote,
potentially in a manner that you do not support, including amendments to our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association.
In addition, prior to the closing of our initial Business Combination, only holders of our Founder Shares will have the right to vote
to continue the company in a jurisdiction outside the Cayman Islands. This provision of our amended and restated memorandum and articles
of association may only be amended by a special resolution passed by not less than 90% of our ordinary shares which are represented in
person or by proxy and are voted at our general meeting. As a result, you will not have any influence over our continuation in a jurisdiction
outside the Cayman Islands prior to our initial Business Combination.
If our initial shareholders
purchase any additional Class A Ordinary Shares in the aftermarket or in privately negotiated transactions, this would increase their
control. Neither our initial shareholders nor, to our knowledge, any of our officers or directors, have any current intention to purchase
additional securities, other than as disclosed in this Form 10-K.
Factors that would be considered
in making such additional purchases would include consideration of the current trading price of our Class A Ordinary Shares. In addition,
our board of directors, whose members were appointed by our Sponsor, is and will be divided into three classes, each of which will generally
serve for a term for three years with only one class of directors being appointed in each year. We may not hold an annual or extraordinary
general meeting to appoint new directors prior to the completion of our initial Business Combination, in which case all of the current
directors will continue in office until at least the completion of the Business Combination. If there is an annual general meeting, as
a consequence of our “staggered” board of directors, only a minority of the board of directors will be considered for appointment
and our initial shareholders, because of their ownership position, will have considerable influence regarding the outcome. Accordingly,
our initial shareholders will continue to exert control at least until the completion of our initial Business Combination.
30
We may not be able to complete an initial
Business Combination since such initial Business Combination may be subject to regulatory review and approval requirement, including foreign
investment regulations and review by government entities such as the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”),
or may be ultimately prohibited.
Our initial Business Combination
may be subject to regulatory review and approval requirements by governmental entities, or ultimately prohibited. For example, CFIUS has
authority to review direct or indirect foreign investments in U.S. companies. Among other things, CFIUS is empowered to require certain
foreign investors to make mandatory filings, to charge filing fees related to such filings, and to self-initiate national security reviews
of foreign direct and indirect investments in U.S. companies if the parties to that investment choose not to file voluntarily. In the
case that CFIUS determines an investment to be a threat to national security, CFIUS has the power to unwind or place restrictions on the
investment. Whether CFIUS has jurisdiction to review an acquisition or investment transaction depends on - among other factors - the
nature and structure of the transaction, including the level of beneficial ownership interest and the nature of any information or governance
rights involved. For example, investments that result in “control” of a U.S. business by a foreign person always are subject
to CFIUS jurisdiction. CFIUS’s expanded jurisdiction under the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 and implementing
regulations that became effective on February 13, 2020 further includes investments that do not result in control of a U.S. business by
a foreign person but afford certain foreign investors certain information or governance rights in a U.S. business that has a nexus to
“critical technologies,” “critical infrastructure” and/or “sensitive personal data.”
Our Sponsor owns approximately
19.8% of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares. Our sponsor is exclusively “controlled” for CFIUS purposes by Mr. Gomberg,
who is a U.S. citizen, and thus we do not believe that our sponsor is a “foreign person” as defined in the CFIUS regulations.
However, it is possible that non-U.S. persons could be involved in our initial Business Combination (e.g., as existing shareholders of
a target company or as PIPE investors), which may increase the risk that our initial Business Combination becomes subject to regulatory
review, including review by CFIUS. As such, an initial Business Combination with a U.S. business or foreign business with U.S. subsidiaries
that we may wish to pursue may be subject to CFIUS review. If a particular proposed initial Business Combination with a U.S. business
falls within CFIUS’s jurisdiction, we may determine that we are required to make a mandatory filing or that we will submit to CFIUS
review on a voluntary basis, or to proceed with the transaction without submitting to CFIUS and risk CFIUS intervention, before or after
closing the transaction. CFIUS may decide to block or delay our proposed initial Business Combination, impose conditions with respect
to such initial Business Combination or request the President of the United States to order us to divest all or a portion of the U.S.
target business of our initial Business Combination that we acquired without first obtaining CFIUS approval, which may limit the attractiveness
of, delay or prevent us from pursuing certain target companies that we believe would otherwise be beneficial to us and our shareholders.
As a result, the pool of potential targets with which we could complete an initial Business Combination may be limited and we may be adversely
affected in terms of competing with other special purpose acquisition companies which do not have any foreign ownership issues. In addition,
certain federally licensed businesses may be subject to rules or regulations that limit foreign ownership. The process of government review,
whether by CFIUS or otherwise, could be lengthy. Because we have only a limited time to complete our initial Business Combination, our
failure to obtain any required approvals within the requisite time period may require us to liquidate. If we are unable to consummate
our initial Business Combination within the applicable time period required under our amended and restated memorandum and articles of
association, including as a result of extended regulatory review of a potential initial Business Combination, we will, as promptly as
reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem the Public Shares for a pro rata portion of the funds held
in the Trust Account, subject to our obligations under Cayman Islands law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other
applicable law. In such event, our shareholders will miss the opportunity to benefit from an investment in a target company and the appreciation
in value of such investment. Additionally, our warrants may be worthless.
31
Because we must furnish our shareholders
with target business financial statements, we may lose the ability to complete an otherwise advantageous initial Business Combination
with some prospective target businesses.
The federal proxy rules require
that the proxy statement with respect to the vote on an initial Business Combination include historical and pro forma financial
statement disclosure. We will include the same financial statement disclosure in connection with our tender offer documents, whether or
not they are required under the tender offer rules. These financial statements may be required to be prepared in accordance with, or be
reconciled to, accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), or international financial
reporting standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS”), depending on the circumstances and
the historical financial statements may be required to be audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States) (“PCAOB”). These financial statement requirements may limit the pool of potential target businesses
we may acquire because some targets may be unable to provide such financial statements in time for us to disclose such statements in accordance
with federal proxy rules and complete our initial Business Combination within the prescribed time frame.
Compliance obligations under the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act may make it more difficult for us to effectuate our initial Business Combination, require substantial financial and management resources,
and increase the time and costs of completing an initial Business Combination.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act requires that we evaluate and report on our system of internal controls beginning with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ending December 31, 2025. Only in the event we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer or an accelerated filer, and no longer qualify
as an emerging growth company, will we be required to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm attestation requirement
on our internal control over financial reporting. Further, for as long as we remain an emerging growth company, we will not be required
to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm attestation requirement on our internal control over financial reporting.
The fact that we are a blank check company makes compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act particularly burdensome on
us as compared to other public companies because a target business with which we seek to complete our initial Business Combination may
not be in compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding adequacy of its internal controls. The development of the
internal control of any such entity to achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increase the time and costs necessary to complete
any such Business Combination.
We may seek Business Combination opportunities
with a high degree of complexity that require significant operational improvements, which could delay or prevent us from achieving our
desired results.
We may seek Business Combination
opportunities with large, highly complex companies that we believe would benefit from operational improvements. While we intend to implement
such improvements, to the extent that our efforts are delayed or we are unable to achieve the desired improvements, the Business Combination
may not be as successful as we anticipate.
To the extent we complete our
initial Business Combination with a large complex business or entity with a complex operating structure, we may also be affected by numerous
risks inherent in the operations of the business with which we combine, which could delay or prevent us from implementing our strategy.
Although our management team will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business and its operations, we may not
be able to properly ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors until we complete our Business Combination. If we are not
able to achieve our desired operational improvements, or the improvements take longer to implement than anticipated, we may not achieve
the gains that we anticipate. Furthermore, some of these risks and complexities may be outside of our control and leave us with no ability
to control or reduce the chances that those risks and complexities will adversely impact a target business. Such combination may not be
as successful as a combination with a smaller, less complex organization.
32
Our initial Business Combination and our
structure thereafter may not be tax-efficient to our shareholders and warrant holders. As a result of our Business Combination, our tax
obligations may be more complex, burdensome and uncertain.
Although we will attempt to
structure our initial Business Combination in a tax-efficient manner, tax structuring considerations are complex, the relevant facts and
law are uncertain and may change, and we may prioritize commercial and other considerations over tax considerations. For example, in connection
with our initial Business Combination and subject to any requisite shareholder approval, we may structure our Business Combination in
a manner that requires shareholders and/or warrant holders to recognize gain or income for tax purposes, effect a Business Combination
with a target company in another jurisdiction, or reincorporate in a different jurisdiction (including, but not limited to, the jurisdiction
in which the target company or business is located). We do not intend to make any cash distributions to shareholders or warrant holders
to pay taxes in connection with our Business Combination or thereafter. Accordingly, a shareholder or a warrant holder may need to satisfy
any liability resulting from our initial Business Combination with cash from its own funds or by selling all or a portion of the shares
or warrants received. In addition, shareholders and warrant holders may also be subject to additional income, withholding or other taxes
with respect to their ownership of us after our initial Business Combination.
In addition, we may effect
a Business Combination with a target company that has business operations outside of the United States, and possibly, business operations
in multiple jurisdictions. If we effect such a Business Combination, we could be subject to significant income, withholding and other
tax obligations in a number of jurisdictions with respect to income, operations and subsidiaries related to those jurisdictions.
Due to the complexity of tax
obligations and filings in other jurisdictions, we may have a heightened risk related to audits or examinations by U.S. federal, state,
local and non-U.S. taxing authorities. This additional complexity and risk could have an adverse effect on our after-tax profitability
and financial condition.
Risks Relating to the Post-Business Combination Company
Subsequent to our completion of our initial
Business Combination, we may be required to take write-downs or write-offs, restructuring and impairment or other charges that could have
a significant negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations and the price of our securities, which could cause you
to lose some or all of your investment.
Even if we conduct due diligence
on a target business with which we combine, we cannot assure you that this diligence will identify all material issues that may be present
with a particular target business, that it would be possible to uncover all material issues through a customary amount of due diligence,
or that factors outside of the target business and outside of our control will not later arise. As a result of these factors, we may be
forced to later write-down or write-off assets, restructure our operations, or incur impairment or other charges that could result in
our reporting losses. Even if our due diligence successfully identifies certain risks, unexpected risks may arise and previously known
risks may materialize in a manner not consistent with our preliminary risk analysis. Even though these charges may be non-cash items and
not have an immediate impact on our liquidity, the fact that we report charges of this nature could contribute to negative market perceptions
about us or our securities. In addition, charges of this nature may cause us to violate net worth or other covenants to which we may be
subject as a result of assuming pre-existing debt held by a target business or by virtue of our obtaining debt financing to partially
finance the initial Business Combination or thereafter. Accordingly, any shareholders or warrant holders who choose to remain shareholders
or warrant holders following the Business Combination could suffer a reduction in the value of our securities. Such shareholders or warrant
holders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value unless they are able to successfully claim that the reduction was due
to the breach by our officers or directors of a duty of care or other fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they are able to successfully
bring a private claim under securities laws that the proxy materials or tender offer documents, as applicable, relating to the Business
Combination contained an actionable material misstatement or material omission.
33
The nominal purchase price paid by our Sponsor
for the Founder Shares may result in significant dilution to the implied value of your Public Shares upon the consummation of our initial
Business Combination.
Prior to our IPO, our Sponsor
paid a nominal aggregate purchase price of $25,000 for the Founder Shares, or approximately $0.004 per share. As a result, the value of
your Public Shares may be significantly diluted upon the consummation of our initial Business Combination, when the Founder Shares are
converted into Class A Ordinary Shares. For example, the following table shows the dilutive effect of the Founder Shares on the implied
value of the Public Shares upon the consummation of our initial Business Combination assuming that our equity value at that time is $
238,750,000 (following payment of $11,250,000 of deferred underwriting commissions), which is the amount we would have for our initial
Business Combination in the Trust Account assuming no interest is earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and no Public Shares are
redeemed in connection with our initial Business Combination, and without taking into account any other potential impacts on our valuation
at such time, such as the trading price of our Public Shares, the Business Combination transaction costs, any equity issued or cash paid
to the target’s sellers or other third parties, or the target’s business itself, including its assets, liabilities, management
and prospects, as well as the value of our public and private warrants. At such valuation, each of our ordinary shares would have an implied
value of $7.64 per share upon consummation of our initial Business Combination, which is a 23.6% decrease as compared to the initial implied
value per Public Share (after taking into consideration the payment of the deferred underwriting commission) of $10.00.
Public Shares
25,000,000
Founder Shares
6,250,000
Total shares
31,250,000
Total funds in trust available for initial Business Combination
$ 238,750,000
Initial implied value per Public Share
$ 10.00
Implied value per share upon consummation of initial Business Combination
$ 7.64
The value of the Founder Shares following
completion of our initial Business Combination is likely to be substantially higher than the nominal price paid for them, even if the
trading price of our ordinary at such time is substantially less than $10.00 per share.
As a result of the IPO, our
Sponsor has invested in us an aggregate of $4,525,000, comprised of the $25,000 purchase price for the Founder Shares and the $4,000,000
purchase price for the Private Placement Warrants. Assuming a trading price of $10.00 per share upon consummation of our initial Business
Combination, the 6,250,000 Founder Shares would have an aggregate implied value of $62,500,000. Even if the trading price of our ordinary
shares were as low as $1.12 per share, and the Private Placement Warrants are worthless, the value of the Founder Shares would be equal
to the Sponsor’s initial investment in us. As a result, our Sponsor is likely to be able to make a substantial profit on its investment
in us at a time when our Public Shares have lost significant value. Accordingly, our management team, which owns interests in our Sponsor,
may be more willing to pursue a Business Combination with a riskier or less-established target business than would be the case if our
Sponsor had paid the same per share price for the Founder Shares as our Public Shareholders paid for their Public Shares.
34
Resources could be wasted in researching
Business Combinations that are not completed, which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate and acquire or merge
with another business. If we are unable to complete our initial Business Combination, our Public Shareholders may only receive their pro
rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account that are available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire
worthless.
We anticipate that the investigation
of each specific target business and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents and other instruments
will require substantial management time and attention and substantial costs for accountants, attorneys and others. If we decide not to
complete a specific initial Business Combination, the costs incurred up to that point for the proposed transaction likely would not be
recoverable. Furthermore, if we reach an agreement relating to a specific target business, we may fail to complete our initial Business
Combination for any number of reasons including those beyond our control. Any such event will result in a loss to us of the related costs
incurred which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate and acquire or merge with another business. If we are unable
to complete our initial Business Combination, our Public Shareholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the
Trust Account that are available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
Our ability to successfully effect our initial
Business Combination and to be successful thereafter will be dependent upon the efforts of our key personnel, some of whom may join us
following our initial Business Combination. The loss of key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our
post- combination business.
Our ability to successfully
effect our initial Business Combination is dependent upon the efforts of our key personnel. The role of our key personnel in the target
business, however, cannot presently be ascertained. Although some of our key personnel may remain with the target business in senior management
or advisory positions following our initial Business Combination, it is likely that some or all of the management of the target business
will remain in place. While we intend to closely scrutinize any individuals we engage after our initial Business Combination, we cannot
assure you that our assessment of these individuals will prove to be correct. These individuals may be unfamiliar with the requirements
of operating a company regulated by the SEC, which could cause us to have to expend time and resources helping them become familiar with
such requirements.
Our key personnel may negotiate employment
or consulting agreements with a target business in connection with a particular Business Combination, and a particular Business Combination
may be conditioned on the retention or resignation of such key personnel. These agreements may provide for them to receive compensation
following our initial Business Combination and as a result, may cause them to have conflicts of interest in determining whether a particular
Business Combination is the most advantageous.
Our key personnel may be able
to remain with our company after the completion of our initial Business Combination only if they are able to negotiate employment or consulting
agreements in connection with the Business Combination. Such negotiations would take place simultaneously with the negotiation of the
Business Combination and could provide for such individuals to receive compensation in the form of cash payments and/or our securities
for services they would render to us after the completion of the Business Combination. Such negotiations also could make such key personnel’s
retention or resignation a condition to any such agreement. The personal and financial interests of such individuals may influence their
motivation in identifying and selecting a target business, subject to their fiduciary duties under Cayman Islands law.
We may have a limited ability to assess
the management of a prospective target business and, as a result, may effect our initial Business Combination with a target business whose
management may not have the skills, qualifications or abilities to manage a public company.
When evaluating the desirability
of effecting our initial Business Combination with a prospective target business, our ability to assess the target business’s management
may be limited due to a lack of time, resources or information. Our assessment of the capabilities of the target business’s management,
therefore, may prove to be incorrect and such management may lack the skills, qualifications or abilities we suspected. Should the target
business’s management not possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to manage a public company, the operations and
profitability of the post-combination business may be negatively impacted. Accordingly, any shareholders or warrant holders who choose
to remain shareholders or warrant holders following the Business Combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their securities.
Such shareholders or warrant holders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value unless they are able to successfully claim
that the reduction was due to the breach by our officers or directors of a duty of care or other fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they
are able to successfully bring a private claim under securities laws that the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable,
relating to the Business Combination contained an actionable material misstatement or material omission.
35
The officers and directors of an acquisition
candidate may resign upon completion of our initial Business Combination. The loss of a Business Combination target’s key personnel
could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.
The role of an acquisition
candidate’s key personnel upon the completion of our initial Business Combination cannot be ascertained at this time. Although we
contemplate that certain members of an acquisition candidate’s management team will remain associated with the acquisition candidate
following our initial Business Combination, it is possible that members of the management of an acquisition candidate will not wish to
remain in place.
Our management may not be able to maintain
control of a target business after our initial Business Combination. We cannot provide assurance that, upon loss of control of a target
business, new management will possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to profitably operate such business.
We may structure our initial
Business Combination so that the post-transaction company in which our Public Shareholders own shares will own less than 100% of the equity
interests or assets of a target business, but we will only complete such Business Combination if the post-transaction company owns or
acquires 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the target or otherwise acquires a controlling interest in the target sufficient
for us not to be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. We will not consider any transaction
that does not meet such criteria. Even if the post- transaction company owns 50% or more of the voting securities of the target, our shareholders
prior to the Business Combination may collectively own a minority interest in the post Business Combination company, depending on valuations
ascribed to the target and us in the Business Combination. For example, we could pursue a transaction in which we issue a substantial
number of new Class A Ordinary Shares in exchange for all of the outstanding capital stock of a target. In this case, we would acquire
a 100% interest in the target.
However, as a result of the
issuance of a substantial number of new Class A Ordinary Shares, our shareholders immediately prior to such transaction could own less
than a majority of our outstanding Class A Ordinary Shares subsequent to such transaction. In addition, other minority shareholders may
subsequently combine their holdings resulting in a single person or group obtaining a larger share of the company’s shares than
we initially acquired. Accordingly, this may make it more likely that our management will not be able to maintain control of the target
business.
Risks Relating to Acquiring and Operating a Business in Foreign
Countries
If we effect our initial Business Combination
with a company located outside of the United States, we would be subject to a variety of additional risks that may adversely affect us.
If we pursue a target company
with operations or opportunities outside of the United States for our initial Business Combination, we may face additional burdens in
connection with investigating, agreeing to and completing such initial Business Combination, and if we effect such initial Business Combination,
we would be subject to a variety of additional risks that may negatively impact our operations.
If we pursue a target a company
with operations or opportunities outside of the United States for our initial Business Combination, we would be subject to risks associated
with cross-border Business Combinations, including in connection with investigating, agreeing to and completing our initial Business Combination,
conducting due diligence in a foreign jurisdiction, having such transaction approved by any local governments, regulators or agencies
and changes in the purchase price based on fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.
36
If we effect our initial Business
Combination with such a company, we would be subject to any special considerations or risks associated with companies operating in an
international setting, including any of the following:
● costs and difficulties inherent in managing cross-border
business operations;
● rules and regulations regarding currency redemption;
● complex corporate withholding taxes on individuals;
● laws governing the manner in which future Business Combinations may be effected;
● exchange listing and/or delisting requirements;
● tariffs and trade barriers;
● regulations related to customs and import/export matters;
● local or regional economic policies and market conditions;
● unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
● challenges in managing and staffing international operations;
● longer payment cycles;
● tax issues, such as tax law changes and variations in tax laws as compared to the United States;
● currency fluctuations and exchange controls;
● rates of inflation;
● challenges in collecting accounts receivable;
● cultural and language differences;
● employment regulations;
● underdeveloped or unpredictable legal or regulatory systems;
● corruption;
● protection of intellectual property;
● social unrest, crime, strikes, riots and civil disturbances;
● regime changes and political upheaval;
● terrorist attacks, natural disasters, widespread health emergencies and wars; and
● deterioration of political relations with the United States.
We may not be able to adequately
address these additional risks. If we were unable to do so, we may be unable to complete such initial Business Combination, or, if we
complete such initial Business Combination, our operations might suffer, either of which may adversely impact our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
37
If we effect our initial Business Combination with a company
located outside of the United States, we would be subject to a variety of additional risks that may adversely affect us.
Following our initial Business
Combination, our management may resign from their positions as officers or directors of the company and the management of the target business
at the time of the Business Combination may remain in place. Management of the target business may not be familiar with United States
securities laws. If new management is unfamiliar with United States securities laws, they may have to expend time and resources becoming
familiar with such laws. This could be expensive and time-consuming and could lead to various regulatory issues which may adversely affect
our operations.
After our initial Business Combination,
substantially all of our assets may be located in a foreign country and substantially all of our revenue will be derived from our operations
in such country. Accordingly, our results of operations and prospects will be subject, to a significant extent, to the economic, political
and legal policies, developments and conditions in the country in which we operate.
The economic, political and
social conditions, as well as government policies, of the country in which our operations are located could affect our business. Economic
growth could be uneven, both geographically and among various sectors of the economy and such growth may not be sustained in the future.
If in the future such country’s economy experiences a downturn or grows at a slower rate than expected, there may be less demand
for spending in certain industries. A decrease in demand for spending in certain industries could materially and adversely affect our
ability to find an attractive target business with which to consummate our initial Business Combination and if we effect our initial Business
Combination, the ability of that target business to become profitable.
Exchange rate fluctuations and currency
policies may cause a target business’ ability to succeed in the international markets to be diminished.
In the event we acquire a non-U.S.
target, all revenues and income would likely be received in a foreign currency, and the dollar equivalent of our net assets and distributions,
if any, could be adversely affected by reductions in the value of the local currency. The value of the currencies in our target regions
fluctuate and are affected by, among other things, changes in political and economic conditions. Any change in the relative value of such
currency against our reporting currency may affect the attractiveness of any target business or, following consummation of our initial
Business Combination, our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, if a currency appreciates in value against the
dollar prior to the consummation of our initial Business Combination, the cost of a target business as measured in dollars will increase,
which may make it less likely that we are able to consummate such transaction.
We are subject to changing law and regulations
regarding regulatory matters, corporate governance and public disclosure that have increased both our costs and the risk of non-compliance.
We are subject to rules and
regulations by various governing bodies, including, for example, the Securities and Exchange Commission, which are charged with the protection
of investors and the oversight of companies whose securities are publicly traded, and to new and evolving regulatory measures under applicable
law. Our efforts to comply with new and changing laws and regulations have resulted in and are likely to continue to result in, increased
general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue- generating activities to compliance
activities.
Moreover, because these laws,
regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance becomes
available. This evolution may result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and additional costs necessitated by ongoing
revisions to our disclosure and governance practices. If we fail to address and comply with these regulations and any subsequent changes,
we may be subject to penalty and our business may be harmed.
Risks Relating to our Management Team
We may not have sufficient funds to satisfy indemnification claims
of our directors and executive officers.
We have agreed to indemnify
our officers and directors to the fullest extent permitted by law. However, our officers and directors have agreed to waive any right,
title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies in the Trust Account and to not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any
reason whatsoever. Accordingly, any indemnification provided will be able to be satisfied by us only if (i) we have sufficient funds outside
of the Trust Account or (ii) we consummate an initial Business Combination. Our obligation to indemnify our officers and directors may
discourage shareholders from bringing a lawsuit against our officers or directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions
also may have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against our officers and directors, even though such an action,
if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our shareholders. Furthermore, a shareholder’s investment may be adversely affected
to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against our officers and directors pursuant to these indemnification provisions.
38
Members of our management team and board
of directors have significant experience as board members, officers or executives of other companies. As a result, certain of those persons
have been, may be, or may become, involved in proceedings, investigations and litigation relating to the business affairs of the companies
with which they were, are, or may in the future be, affiliated. This may have an adverse effect on us, which may impede our ability to
consummate an initial Business Combination.
During the course of their
careers, members of our management team and board of directors have had significant experience as board members, officers or executives
of other companies. As a result of their involvement and positions in these companies, certain persons were, are now, or may in the future
become, involved in litigation, investigations or other proceedings relating to the business affairs of such companies or transactions
entered into by such companies. Any such litigation, investigations or other proceedings may divert our management team’s and board’s
attention and resources away from identifying and selecting a target business or businesses for our initial Business Combination and may
negatively affect our reputation, which may impede our ability to complete an initial Business Combination.
Members of our management team and affiliated
companies may have been, and may in the future be, involved in civil disputes or governmental investigations unrelated to our business.
Members of our management team
have been (and intend to be) involved in a wide variety of businesses. Such involvement has, and may lead to, media coverage and public
awareness. As a result, members of our management team and affiliated companies may have been, and may in the future be, involved in civil
disputes or governmental investigations unrelated to our business. Any such claims or investigations may be detrimental to our reputation
and could negatively affect our ability to identify and complete an initial Business Combination and may have an adverse effect on the
price of our securities.
Past performance by our management team
and their affiliates may not be indicative of future performance of an investment in us.
Information regarding performance
by, or businesses associated with, our management team or businesses associated with them is presented for informational purposes only.
Past performance by our management team is not a guarantee either (i) of success with respect to any Business Combination we may consummate
or (ii) that we will be able to locate a suitable candidate for our initial Business Combination. You should not rely on the historical
record of the performance of our management team’s or businesses associated with them as indicative of our future performance of
an investment in us or the returns we will, or is likely to, generate going forward.
We may seek Business Combination opportunities
in industries or sectors that may be outside of our management’s areas of expertise.
We will consider a Business
Combination outside of our management’s areas of expertise if a Business Combination candidate is presented to us and we determine
that such candidate offers an attractive Business Combination opportunity for our company. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate
the risks inherent in any particular Business Combination candidate, we cannot assure you that we will adequately ascertain or assess
all of the significant risk factors. We also cannot assure you that an investment in our securities will not ultimately prove to be less
favorable to investors than a direct investment, if an opportunity were available, in a Business Combination candidate. In the event we
elect to pursue a Business Combination outside of the areas of our management’s expertise, our management’s expertise may
not be directly applicable to its evaluation or operation, and the information contained in this Form 10-K regarding the areas of our
management’s expertise would not be relevant to an understanding of the business that we elect to acquire. As a result, our management
may not be able to ascertain or assess adequately all of the relevant risk factors. Accordingly, any shareholders who choose to remain
shareholders following our initial Business Combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their shares. Such shareholders are unlikely
to have a remedy for such reduction in value.
39
We are dependent upon our executive officers
and directors and their loss, or a reduction in the amount of time they can dedicate to our initial Business Combination, could adversely
affect our ability to operate.
Our operations are dependent
upon a relatively small group of individuals and, in particular, our executive officers and directors and the members of our advisory
board. We believe that our success depends on the continued service of our officers, directors and members of our advisory board, at least
until we have completed our initial Business Combination. In addition, our executive officers and directors are not required to commit
any specified amount of time to our affairs and, accordingly, will have conflicts of interest in allocating their time among various business
activities, including identifying potential Business Combinations and monitoring the related due diligence. We do not have an employment
agreement with, or key-man insurance on the life of, any of our directors or executive officers. The unexpected loss of the services of
one or more of our directors or executive officers could have a detrimental effect on us.
Our executive officers and directors will
allocate their time to other businesses thereby causing conflicts of interest in their determination as to how much time to devote to
our affairs. This conflict of interest could have a negative impact on our ability to complete our initial Business Combination.
Our executive officers and
directors are not required to, and will not, commit their full time to our affairs, which may result in a conflict of interest in allocating
their time between our operations and our search for a Business Combination and their other businesses. We do not intend to have any full-time
employees prior to the completion of our initial Business Combination. If our executive officers’ and directors’ other business
affairs require them to devote substantial amounts of time to such affairs in excess of their current commitment levels, it could limit
their ability to devote time to our affairs which may have a negative impact on our ability to complete our initial Business Combination.
Any such companies, businesses or investments may present additional conflicts of interest in pursuing an initial Business Combination
target. However, we do not believe that any such potential conflicts would materially affect our ability to complete our initial Business
Combination. For a complete discussion of our executive officers’ and directors’ other business affairs, please see “ Management - Officers
and Directors .”
Our officers and directors presently have,
and any of them in the future may have additional, fiduciary or contractual obligations to other entities, including blank check companies,
and, accordingly, may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time and in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity
should be presented.
Until we consummate our initial
Business Combination, we intend to engage in the business of identifying and combining with one or more businesses. Our Sponsor and our
officers and directors are, and in the future may become, affiliated with such entities (such as operating companies or investment vehicles)
that are engaged in a similar business. We do not have employment contracts with our officers and directors that will limit their ability
to work at other businesses. Our officers and directors presently and any in the future may have, additional fiduciary or contractual
obligations to other entities pursuant to which such officer or director is or will be required to present a Business Combination opportunity
to such entities. Accordingly, they may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should
be presented. These conflicts may not be resolved in our favor and a potential target business may be presented to another entity prior
to its presentation to us.
Our officers and directors
presently and in the future may have additional, fiduciary or contractual obligations to other entities pursuant to which such officer
or director is or will be required to present a Business Combination opportunity. Accordingly, if any of our officers or directors becomes
aware of a Business Combination opportunity which is suitable for an entity to which he or she has then-current fiduciary or contractual
obligations, he or she will honor his or her fiduciary or contractual obligations to present such opportunity to such entity. In addition,
certain of our officers and directors are members of our Sponsor and own membership interests of our Sponsor. The remaining membership
interests are held by third party investors that are not affiliated with members of our management. We do not believe, however, that the
fiduciary duties or contractual obligations of our officers or directors will materially affect our ability to complete our Business Combination.
Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law: (i) no
individual serving as a director or an officer shall have any duty, except and to the extent expressly assumed by contract, to refrain
from engaging directly or indirectly in the same or similar business activities or lines of business as us, and (ii) we renounce any interest
or expectancy in, or in being offered an opportunity to participate in, any potential transaction or matter which may be a corporate opportunity
for any director or officer, on the one hand, and us, on the other. The purpose for the surrender of corporate opportunities is to allow
officers, directors or other representatives with multiple business affiliations to continue to serve as an officer of our company or
on our board of directors. Our officers and directors may from time to time be presented with opportunities that could benefit both another
business affiliation and us. In the absence of the “corporate opportunity” waiver in our charter, certain candidates would
not be able to serve as an officer or director. We believe we substantially benefit from having representatives who bring significant,
relevant and valuable experience to our management, and, as a result, the inclusion of the “corporate opportunity” waiver
in our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide us with greater flexibility to attract and retain the officers
and directors that we feel are the best candidates. We do not believe, however, that the fiduciary duties or contractual obligations of
our officers or directors will materially affect our ability to complete our initial business.
40
In addition, our Sponsor and
our officers and directors may Sponsor or form other special purpose acquisition companies with acquisition objectives that are similar
to ours or may pursue other business or investment ventures during the period in which we are seeking an initial Business Combination.
As a result, our Sponsor, officers and directors could have conflicts of interest in determining whether to present Business Combination
to us or to any other special purpose acquisition company with which they may become involved. Any such companies, businesses or investments
may present additional conflicts of interest in pursuing an initial Business Combination target. However, we do not believe any such potential
conflict would materially affect our ability to complete our initial Business Combination.
Our executive officers, directors, security
holders and their respective affiliates may have competitive pecuniary interests that conflict with our interests.
We have not adopted a policy
that expressly prohibits our directors, officers, security holders or affiliates from having a direct or indirect pecuniary or financial
interest in any investment to be acquired or disposed of by us or in any transaction to which we are a party or have an interest. In fact,
we may enter into a Business Combination with a target business that is affiliated with our Sponsor, our directors or officers, although
we do not intend to do so. Nor do we have a policy that expressly prohibits any such persons from engaging for their own account in business
activities of the types conducted by us. Accordingly, such persons or entities may have a conflict between their interests and ours. Any
such companies, businesses or investments may present additional conflicts of interest in pursuing an initial Business Combination target.
However, we do not believe that any such potential conflicts would materially affect our ability to complete our initial Business Combination.
The personal and financial
interests of our directors and officers may influence their motivation in timely identifying and selecting a target business and completing
a Business Combination. Consequently, our directors’ and officers’ discretion in identifying and selecting a suitable target
business may result in a conflict of interest when determining whether the terms, conditions and timing of a particular Business Combination
are appropriate and in our shareholders’ best interest. If this were the case, it would be a breach of their fiduciary duties to
us as a matter of Cayman Islands law and we or our shareholders might have a claim against such individuals for infringing on our shareholders’
rights. However, we might not ultimately be successful in any claim we may make against them for such reason.
We may engage in a Business Combination
with one or more target businesses that have relationships with entities that may be affiliated with our Sponsor, executive officers,
directors or existing holders which may raise potential conflicts of interest.
In light of the involvement
of our Sponsor, executive officers and directors with other entities, we may decide to acquire one or more businesses affiliated with
our Sponsor, executive officers, directors or existing holders. Our directors also serve as officers and board members for other entities,
including, without limitation, those described under “ Management - Conflicts of Interest .” Such entities
may compete with us for Business Combination opportunities. Our Sponsor, officers and directors are not currently aware of any specific
opportunities for us to complete our initial Business Combination with any entities with which they are affiliated, and there have been
no substantive discussions concerning a Business Combination with any such entity or entities. Although we will not be specifically focusing
on, or targeting, any transaction with any affiliated entities, we would pursue such a transaction if we determined that such affiliated
entity met our criteria for a Business Combination as set forth in “ Proposed Business - Business Combination Criteria ”
and such transaction was approved by a majority of our independent and disinterested directors. Despite our agreement to obtain an opinion
from an independent investment banking firm which is a member of FINRA or a valuation or appraisal firm regarding the fairness to our
company from a financial point of view of a Business Combination with one or more domestic or international businesses affiliated with
our Sponsor, executive officers, directors or existing holders, potential conflicts of interest still may exist and, as a result, the
terms of the Business Combination may not be as advantageous to our Public Shareholders as they would be absent any conflicts of interest.
41
We may engage one or more of our underwriters
or one of their respective affiliates to provide additional services to us, which may include acting as financial advisor in connection
with an initial Business Combination or as placement agent in connection with a related financing transaction. Our underwriters are entitled
to receive deferred commissions that will released from the trust only on a completion of an initial Business Combination. These financial
incentives may cause them to have potential conflicts of interest in rendering any such additional services to us after our IPO, including,
for example, in connection with the sourcing and consummation of an initial Business Combination.
We may engage one or more of
our underwriters or one of their respective affiliates to provide additional services to us after our IPO, including, for example, identifying
potential targets, providing financial advisory services, acting as a placement agent in a private offering or arranging debt financing.
We may pay such underwriter or its affiliate fair and reasonable fees or other compensation that would be determined at that time in an
arm’s length negotiation. The underwriters are also entitled to receive deferred commissions that are conditioned on the completion
of an initial Business Combination. The underwriters’ or their respective affiliates’ financial interests tied to the consummation
of a Business Combination transaction may give rise to potential conflicts of interest in providing any such additional services to us,
including potential conflicts of interest in connection with the sourcing and consummation of an initial Business Combination.
Since our Sponsor, executive officers and
directors will lose their entire investment in us if our initial Business Combination is not completed (other than with respect to Public
Shares they have acquired, or may in the future acquire, if any), a conflict of interest may arise in determining whether a particular
Business Combination target is appropriate for our initial Business Combination.
On January 23, 2024, our Sponsor
made a capital contribution of $25,000, or approximately $0.004 per share, to cover certain of our expenses, for which we issued 5,750,000
Founders Shares to our Sponsor. On April 29, 2024, we affected a share capitalization of 1,437,500 Founder Shares, resulting in our Sponsor
holding 7,187,500 Founder Shares. Prior to the initial investment in the Company of $25,000 by our Sponsor, we had no assets, tangible
or intangible. The purchase price of the Founder Shares was determined by dividing the amount of cash paid to the Company by the number
of Founder Shares issued. The number of Founder Shares outstanding was determined based on the expectation at the time that the total
size of the IPO would be a maximum of 28,750,000 units if the underwriters’ over-allotment option is exercised in full, and therefore
that such Founder Shares would represent 20% of the outstanding shares after the IPO.
In addition, our Sponsor, Cantor
and Odeon purchased an aggregate of 7,000,000 Private Placement Warrants for an aggregate purchase price of $7,000,000, or $1.00 per warrant.
Of those 7,000,000 Private Placement Warrants, our Sponsor purchased 4,500,000 Private Placement Warrants, Cantor purchased 1,750,000
Private Placement Warrants and Odeon purchased 750,000 Private Placement Warrants. The Private Placement Warrants will be worthless if
we do not complete our initial Business Combination.
The personal and financial
interests of our executive officers and directors may influence their motivation in identifying and selecting a target Business Combination,
completing an initial Business Combination and influencing the operation of the business following the initial Business Combination. This
risk may become more acute as the end of the Completion Window nears, which is the deadline for our completion of an initial Business
Combination.
The non-managing Sponsor investors
are not required to (i) hold any units, Class A Ordinary Shares or Public Warrants they purchased in the IPO or thereafter for any amount
of time, (ii) vote any Class A Ordinary Shares they may own at the applicable time in favor of our initial Business Combination or (iii)
refrain from exercising their right to redeem their Public Shares at the time of our initial Business Combination. The non-managing Sponsor
investors will have the same rights to the funds held in the Trust Account with respect to the Class A Ordinary Shares underlying the
units they may purchase in the initial offering as the rights afforded to our other Public Shareholders.
42
Risks Relating to our Securities
You will not have any rights or interests
in funds from the Trust Account, except under certain limited circumstances. Therefore, to liquidate your investment, you may be forced
to sell your Public Shares or warrants, potentially at a loss.
Our Public Shareholders will
be entitled to receive funds from the Trust Account only upon the earlier to occur of: (i) our completion of an initial Business Combination,
and then only in connection with those Class A Ordinary Shares that such shareholder properly elected to redeem, subject to the limitations
described herein, (ii) the redemption of any Public Shares properly submitted in connection with a shareholder vote to amend our amended
and restated memorandum and articles of association (A) to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our Public
Shares if we do not complete our initial Business Combination within the Completion Window or (B) with respect to any other material provisions
relating to shareholders’ rights or pre-initial Business Combination activity, and the redemption of our Public Shares if we are
unable to complete an initial Business Combination within the Completion Window, subject to applicable law and as further described herein.
In addition, if our plan to redeem our Public Shares if we are unable to complete an initial Business Combination within the Completion
Window for any reason, compliance with Cayman Islands law may require that we submit a plan of dissolution to our then-existing shareholders
for approval prior to the distribution of the proceeds held in our Trust Account. In that case, Public Shareholders may be forced to wait
beyond the Completion Window before they receive funds from our Trust Account. In no other circumstances will a Public Shareholder have
any right or interest of any kind in the Trust Account. Holders of warrants will not have any right to the proceeds held in the Trust
Account with respect to the warrants. Accordingly, to liquidate your investment, you may be forced to sell your Public Shares or warrants,
potentially at a loss.
Nasdaq American may delist our securities
from trading on its exchange, which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in our securities and subject us to additional
trading restrictions.
Our Units Class A Ordinary
Shares, and Public Warrants are listed on Nasdaq. We cannot assure you that our securities will continue to be listed on Nasdaq in the
future or prior to our initial Business Combination. In order to continue listing our securities on Nasdaq prior to our initial Business
Combination, we must maintain certain financial, distribution and share price levels. Additionally, in connection with our initial Business
Combination, we will be required to demonstrate compliance with Nasdaq’s initial listing requirements, which are more rigorous than
Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements, in order to continue to maintain the listing of our securities on Nasdaq. We cannot assure
you that we will be able to meet those initial listing requirements at that time.
If Nasdaq delists our securities
from trading on its exchange and we are not able to list our securities on another national securities exchange, we expect our securities
could be quoted on an over-the-counter market. If this were to occur, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including:
● a limited availability of market quotations for our securities;
● reduced liquidity for our securities;
● a determination that our Class A Ordinary Shares are a “penny stock” which will require brokers
trading in our Class A Ordinary Shares to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in
the secondary trading market for our securities;
● a limited amount of news and analyst coverage; and
● a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain
additional financing in the future.
The National Securities Markets
Improvement Act of 1996, which is a federal statute, prevents or preempts the states from regulating the sale of certain securities, which
are referred to as “covered securities.” Because our securities are listed on Nasdaq, our securities qualify as covered securities
under the statute. Although the states are preempted from regulating the sale of our securities, the federal statute does allow the states
to investigate companies if there is a suspicion of fraud, and, if there is a finding of fraudulent activity, then the states can regulate
or bar the sale of covered securities in a particular case. While we are not aware of a state having used these powers to prohibit or
restrict the sale of securities issued by blank check companies, other than the State of Idaho, certain state securities regulators view
blank check companies unfavorably and might use these powers, or threaten to use these powers, to hinder the sale of securities of blank
check companies in their states. Further, if we were no longer listed on Nasdaq, our securities would not qualify as covered securities
under the statute and we would be subject to regulation in each state in which we offer our securities.
43
You will not be permitted to exercise your
warrants unless we register and qualify the underlying Class A Ordinary Shares or certain exemptions are available.
If the issuance of the Class
A Ordinary Shares upon exercise of the warrants is not registered, qualified or exempt from registration or qualification under the Securities
Act and applicable state securities laws, holders of warrants will not be entitled to exercise such warrants and such warrants may have
no value and expire worthless. In such event, holders who acquired their warrants as part of a purchase of units will have paid the full
unit purchase price solely for the Class A Ordinary Shares included in the units.
We registered the Class A Ordinary
Shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants in the registration statement for our IPO because the warrants will become exercisable 30
days after the completion of our initial Business Combination, which may be within one year of the IPO. However, because the warrants
will be exercisable until their expiration date of up to five years after the completion of our initial Business Combination, in order
to comply with the requirements of Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act following the consummation of our initial Business Combination
under the terms of the warrant agreement, we have agreed that, as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 15 business days, after
the closing of our initial Business Combination, we will use our best efforts to file with the SEC a post- effective amendment to the
registration statement for our IPO, or a new registration statement covering the registration under the Securities Act of the Class A
Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants and thereafter will use our best efforts to cause the same to become effective
within 60 business days following our initial Business Combination and to maintain a current prospectus relating to the Class A Ordinary
Shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants until the expiration of the warrants in accordance with the provisions of the warrant agreement.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to do so if, for example, any facts or events arise which represent a fundamental change in
the information set forth in the registration statement or prospectus, the financial statements contained or incorporated by reference
therein are not current or correct or the SEC issues a stop order.
If the Class A Ordinary Shares
issuable upon exercise of the warrants are not registered under the Securities Act, under the terms of the warrant agreement, holders
of warrants who seek to exercise their warrants will not be permitted to do so for cash and, instead, will be required to do so on a cashless
basis in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act or another exemption.
In no event will warrants be
exercisable for cash or on a cashless basis, and we will not be obligated to issue any shares to holders seeking to exercise their warrants,
unless the issuance of the shares upon such exercise is registered or qualified under the securities laws of the state of the exercising
holder, or an exemption from registration or qualification is available.
If our Class A Ordinary Shares
are at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that they satisfy the definition of “covered
securities” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act, we may, at our option, not permit holders of warrants who seek to exercise
their warrants to do so for cash and, instead, require them to do so on a cashless basis in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities
Act; in the event we so elect, we will not be required to file or maintain in effect a registration statement or register or qualify the
shares underlying the warrants under applicable state securities laws, and in the event we do not so elect, we will use our commercially
reasonable efforts to register or qualify the shares underlying the warrants under applicable state securities laws to the extent an exemption
is not available.
In no event will we be required
to net cash settle any warrant, or issue securities (other than upon a cashless exercise as described above) or other compensation in
exchange for the warrants in the event that we are unable to register or qualify the shares underlying the warrants under the Securities
Act or applicable state securities laws.
44
You may only be able to exercise your Public
Warrants on a “cashless basis” under certain circumstances, and if you do so, you will receive fewer Class A Ordinary Shares
from such exercise than if you were to exercise such warrants for cash.
The warrant agreement provides
that in the following circumstances holders of warrants who seek to exercise their warrants will not be permitted to do for cash and will,
instead, be required to do so on a cashless basis in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act: (i) if the Class A Ordinary
Shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are not registered under the Securities Act in accordance with the terms of the warrant
agreement; if we have so elected and the Class A Ordinary Shares are at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national
securities exchange such that they satisfy the definition of “covered securities” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities
Act; and (iii) if we have so elected and we call the Public Warrants for redemption. If you exercise your Public Warrants on a cashless
basis, you would pay the warrant exercise price by surrendering the warrants for that number of Class A Ordinary Shares equal to the quotient
obtained by dividing (x) the product of the number Class A Ordinary Shares underlying the warrants, multiplied by the excess of the “Fair
Market Value” of our Class A Ordinary Shares (as defined in the next sentence) over the exercise price of the warrants by (y) the
Fair Market Value. The “Fair Market Value” is the average reported closing price of the Class A Ordinary Shares for the 10
trading days ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which the notice of exercise is received by the warrant agent or on
which the notice of redemption is sent to the holders of warrants, as applicable. As a result, you would receive fewer Class A Ordinary
Shares from such exercise than if you were to exercise such warrants for cash.
The grant of registration rights to our initial shareholders
and holders of our Private Placement Warrants may make it more difficult to complete our initial Business Combination, and the future
exercise of such rights may adversely affect the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares.
Pursuant to an agreement entered
into concurrently with the issuance and sale of the securities in the IPO, our initial shareholders and their permitted transferees can
demand that we register the Class A Ordinary Shares into which Founder Shares are convertible, holders of our Private Placement Warrants
and their permitted transferees can demand that we register the Private Placement Warrants and the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon
exercise of the Private Placement Warrants and holders of warrants that may be issued upon conversion of working capital loans (as defined
below in the “Related Party Loans” section) may demand that we register such warrants or the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable
upon conversion of such warrants. The registration rights will be exercisable with respect to the Founder Shares, the Private Placement
Warrants and the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of such Private Placement Warrants. We will bear the cost of registering
these securities. The registration and availability of such a significant number of securities for trading in the public market may have
an adverse effect on the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares. In addition, the existence of the registration rights may make our
initial Business Combination more costly or difficult to conclude. This is because the shareholders of the target business may increase
the equity stake they seek in the combined entity or ask for more cash consideration to offset the negative impact on the market price
of our Class A Ordinary Shares that is expected when the ordinary shares owned by our initial shareholders, holders of our Private Placement
Warrants or holders of our working capital loans (as defined below in the “Related Party Loans” section) or their respective
permitted transferees are registered.
45
We may issue additional Class A Ordinary
Shares or preference shares to complete our initial Business Combination or under an employee incentive plan after completion of our initial
Business Combination. We may also issue Class A Ordinary Shares upon the conversion of the Founder Shares at a ratio greater than one-to-
one at the time of our initial Business Combination as a result of the anti-dilution provisions contained in our amended and restated
memorandum and articles of association. Any such issuances would dilute the interest of our shareholders and likely present other risks.
Our amended and restated memorandum
and articles of association authorize the issuance of up to 200,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares, par value $0.0001 per share, 20,000,000
Class B ordinary shares, par value $0.0001 per share, and 1,000,000 preference shares, par value $0.0001 per share. As of the date of
this Form 10-K, there are 28,750,000 Class A Ordinary Shares, 7,187,500 Class B ordinary shares, and 21,375,000 warrants outstanding.
The Class B ordinary shares are automatically convertible into Class A Ordinary Shares concurrently with or immediately following the
consummation of our initial Business Combination, or earlier at the option of the holders thereof, initially at a one-for-one ratio but
subject to adjustment as set forth herein and in our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association. The warrants will become
exercisable for Class A Ordinary Shares at an initial exercise price of $11.50 per share beginning 30 days after the completion of our
initial Business Combination. There are no preference shares issued and outstanding.
We may issue a substantial
number of additional Class A Ordinary Shares or preference shares to complete our initial Business Combination or under an employee incentive
plan after completion of our initial Business Combination. We may also issue Class A Ordinary Shares upon conversion of the Class B ordinary
shares at a ratio greater than one-to-one at the time of our initial Business Combination as a result of the anti-dilution provisions
as set forth therein. However, our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide, among other things, that prior
to our initial Business Combination, we may not issue additional shares that would entitle the holders thereof to (i) receive funds from
the Trust Account or (ii) vote as a class with our Public Shares on any initial Business Combination. These provisions of our amended
and restated memorandum and articles of association, like all provisions of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association,
may be amended with a shareholder vote. The issuance of additional ordinary shares or preference shares:
● may significantly dilute the equity interest of investors in the IPO, which dilution would increase if
the anti-dilution provisions in the Class B ordinary shares resulted in the issuance of Class A Ordinary Shares on a greater than one-to-one
basis upon conversion of the Class B ordinary shares;
● may subordinate the rights of holders of Class A Ordinary Shares if preference shares are issued with
rights senior to those afforded our Class A Ordinary Shares;
● may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of us by diluting the share ownership
or voting rights of a person seeking to obtain control of us;
● could cause a change in control if a substantial number of Class A Ordinary Shares are issued, which may
affect, among other things, our ability to use our net operating loss carry forwards, if any, and could result in the resignation or removal
of our present officers and directors;
● may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our Units, Class A Ordinary Shares and/or warrants;
and may not result in adjustment to the exercise price of our warrants.
We may amend the terms of the warrants in
a manner that may be adverse to holders of Public Warrants with the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding Public
Warrants. As a result, the exercise price of your warrants could be increased, the exercise period could be shortened and the number of
Class A Ordinary Shares purchasable upon exercise of a warrant could be decreased, all without your approval.
Our warrants were issued in
registered form under a warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent, and us. The warrant
agreement provides that the terms of the warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder to cure any ambiguity or correct any
defective provision, but requires the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding Public Warrants to make any change
that adversely affects the interests of the registered holders of Public Warrants. Accordingly, we may amend the terms of the Public Warrants
in a manner adverse to a holder if holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding Public Warrants approve of such amendment. Although
our ability to amend the terms of the Public Warrants with the consent of at least 50% of the then outstanding Public Warrants is unlimited,
examples of such amendments could be amendments to, among other things, increase the exercise price of the Public Warrants, convert the
Public Warrants into cash or share (at a ratio different than initially provided), shorten the exercise period or decrease the number
of Class A Ordinary Shares purchasable upon exercise of a Public Warrant.
46
A provision of our warrant agreement may
make it more difficult for us to consummate an initial Business Combination.
If (i) we issue additional
ordinary shares or equity-linked securities for capital raising purposes in connection with the closing of our initial Business Combination
at a Newly Issued Price of less than $9.20 per Class A Ordinary Share, (ii) the aggregate gross proceeds from such issuances represent
more than 60% of the total equity proceeds, and interest thereon, available for the funding of our initial Business Combination (net of
redemptions), and (iii) the volume weighted average trading price of the Ordinary Shares during the 20 trading day period starting
on the trading day prior to the day on which the Company consummates the Business Combination (such price, the “ Market Value ”)
of our Class A Ordinary Shares is below $9.20 per share, then the exercise price of the warrants will be adjusted (to the nearest cent)
to be equal to 115% of the higher of the Market Value and the Newly Issued Price, and the $18.00 per share redemption trigger prices described
in the registration statement for our IPO under “ Description of Securities - Warrants - Public
Warrants - Redemption of warrants for cash ” will be adjusted (to the nearest cent) to be equal to 180%
of the higher of the Market Value and the Newly Issued Price. This may make it more difficult for us to consummate an initial Business
Combination with a target business.
We may redeem your unexpired warrants prior to their exercise
at a time that is disadvantageous to you, thereby making your warrants worthless.
We have the ability to redeem
all of the outstanding warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a price of $0.01 per warrant,
provided that the closing price of our Class A Ordinary Shares equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for share splits,
share capitalizations, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like and for certain issuances of Class A Ordinary Shares and equity-
linked securities for capital raising purposes in connection with the closing of our initial Business Combination as described elsewhere
in this Form 10-K) for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading-day period ending on the third trading day prior to proper notice of such
redemption provided that on the date we give notice of redemption. We will not redeem the warrants unless an effective registration
statement under the Securities Act covering issuance of the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants is effective
and a current prospectus relating to those Class A Ordinary Shares is available throughout the 30-day measurement period, except if the
warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis and such cashless exercise is exempt from registration under the Securities Act. If and
when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may not exercise our redemption right if the issuance of ordinary shares upon exercise of
the warrants is not exempt from registration or qualification under applicable state blue sky laws or we are unable to effect such registration
or qualification. We will use our commercially reasonable efforts to register or qualify such ordinary shares under the blue sky laws
of the state of residence in those states in which warrants were offered by us in the IPO. Redemption of the outstanding warrants could
force you to (1) exercise your warrants and pay the exercise price therefor at a time when it may be disadvantageous for you to do so,
(ii) sell your warrants at the then-current market price when you might otherwise wish to hold your warrants or (iii) accept the nominal
redemption price which, at the time the outstanding warrants are called for redemption, is likely to be substantially less than the market
value of your warrants.
Our warrants may have an adverse effect
on the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares and make it more difficult to effectuate our initial Business Combination.
We issued warrants to purchase
14,375,000 Class A Ordinary Shares in connection with the IPO and, simultaneously with the closing of the IPO, we issued in a private
placement an aggregate of 7,000,000 Private Placement Warrants, at $1.00 per warrant. In addition, if our Sponsor or an affiliate of our
Sponsor or certain of our officers and directors makes any working capital loans (as defined below in the “Related Party Loans”
section), such lender may convert those loans into up to an additional 1,500,000 Private Placement Warrants, at the price of $1.00 per
warrant.
To the extent we issue ordinary
shares to effectuate a business transaction, the potential for the issuance of a substantial number of additional Class A Ordinary Shares
upon exercise of these warrants could make us a less attractive acquisition vehicle to a target business. Such warrants, when exercised,
will increase the number of issued and outstanding Class A Ordinary Shares and reduce the value of the Class A Ordinary Shares issued
to complete the business transaction. Therefore, our warrants may make it more difficult to effectuate a business transaction or increase
the cost of acquiring the target business.
47
Because each unit contains one-half of one
warrant and only a whole warrant may be exercised, the units may be worth less than units of other special purpose acquisition companies.
Each unit contains one-half
of one warrant. Pursuant to the warrant agreement, no fractional warrants will be issued upon separation of the units, and only whole
warrants will trade. If, upon exercise of the warrants, a holder would be entitled to receive a fractional interest in a share, we will,
upon exercise, round down to the nearest whole number the number of Class A Ordinary Shares to be issued to the warrant holder. This is
different from other offerings similar to ours whose units include one ordinary share and one warrant to purchase one whole share. We
have established the components of the units in this way in order to reduce the dilutive effect of the warrants upon completion of a Business
Combination since the warrants will be exercisable in the aggregate for one-third of the number of shares compared to units that each
contain a whole warrant to purchase one share, thus making us, we believe, a more attractive merger partner for target businesses. Nevertheless,
this unit structure may cause our Units to be worth less than if it included a warrant to purchase one whole share.
Our warrant agreement designates the courts
of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York as the sole and exclusive forum for
certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by holders of our warrants, which could limit the ability of warrant holders
to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with our company.
Our warrant agreement provides
that, subject to applicable law, (i) any action, proceeding or claim against us arising out of or relating in any way to the warrant agreement,
including under the Securities Act, will be brought and enforced in the courts of the State of New York or the United States District
Court for the Southern District of New York, and (ii) that we irrevocably submit to such jurisdiction, which jurisdiction shall be the
exclusive forum for any such action, proceeding or claim. We have waived any objection to such exclusive jurisdiction and that such courts
represent an inconvenient forum. With respect to any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act or the rules
and regulations promulgated thereunder, we note, however, that there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce this provision
and that investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. Section 22 of the
Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for state and federal courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created
by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder.
Notwithstanding the foregoing,
these provisions of the warrant agreement do not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act or
any other claim for which the federal district courts of the United States of America are the sole and exclusive forum. Any person or
entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in any of our warrants shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to
the forum provisions in our warrant agreement. If any action, the subject matter of which is within the scope the forum provisions of
the warrant agreement, is filed in a court other than a court of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York (a “Foreign Action”) in the name of any holder of our warrants, such holder shall be deemed to have consented
to: (x) the personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in the State of New York in connection with any action brought
in any such court to enforce the forum provisions (an “Enforcement Action”), and (y) having service of process made upon such
warrant holder in any such Enforcement Action by service upon such warrant holder’s counsel in the Foreign Action as agent for such
warrant holder.
This choice-of-forum provision
may limit a warrant holder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with our company,
which may discourage such lawsuits. Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision of our warrant agreement inapplicable or unenforceable
with respect to one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving
such matters in other jurisdictions, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations
and result in a diversion of the time and resources of our management and board of directors.
48
An active trading market for our securities
may not develop, which would adversely affect the liquidity and price of our securities.
An active trading market for
our securities may never develop or, if developed, it may not be sustained. You may be unable to sell your securities unless a market
can be established and sustained.
Because we are incorporated under the laws
of the Cayman Islands, you may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through the U.S.
federal courts may be limited.
We are an exempted company
incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process within
the United States upon our directors or officers, or enforce judgments obtained in the United States courts against our directors or officers.
Our corporate affairs are governed
by our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, the Companies Act (as the same may be supplemented or amended from
time to time) and the common law of the Cayman Islands. We will also be subject to the federal securities laws of the United States. The
rights of shareholders to take action against the directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our
directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the
Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from English common law,
the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding on a court in the Cayman Islands.
The rights of our shareholders
and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are different from what they would be under statutes or judicial
precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a different body of securities laws as compared
to the United States, and certain states, such as Delaware, may have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate
law. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholders derivative action in a Federal court of the
United States.
We have been advised by Maples
and Calder (Cayman) LLP, Cayman Islands legal counsel, that the courts of the Cayman Islands are unlikely (i) to recognize or enforce
against us judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the
United States or any state; and (ii) in original actions brought in the Cayman Islands, to impose liabilities against us predicated upon
the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States or any state, so far as the liabilities imposed by
those provisions are penal in nature. In those circumstances, although there is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman Islands of judgments
obtained in the United States, the courts of the Cayman Islands will recognize and enforce a foreign money judgment of a foreign court
of competent jurisdiction without retrial on the merits based on the principle that a judgment of a competent foreign court imposes upon
the judgment debtor an obligation to pay the sum for which judgment has been given provided certain conditions are met. For a foreign
judgment to be enforced in the Cayman Islands, such judgment must be final and conclusive and for a liquidated sum, and must not be in
respect of taxes or a fine or penalty, inconsistent with a Cayman Islands judgment in respect of the same matter, impeachable on the grounds
of fraud or obtained in a manner, or be of a kind the enforcement of which is, contrary to natural justice or the public policy of the
Cayman Islands (awards of punitive or multiple damages may well be held to be contrary to public policy). A Cayman Islands Court may stay
enforcement proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere.
As a result of all of the above,
Public Shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by management, members of the
board of directors or controlling shareholders than they would as Public Shareholders of a United States company.
49
General Risk Factors
We are a blank check company with no operating
history and no revenues, and you have no basis on which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective.
We are a blank check company
incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands with no operating results, and we did not commence operations until obtaining funding
through the IPO. Because we lack an operating history, you have no basis upon which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective
of completing our initial Business Combination. We have no plans, arrangements or understandings with any prospective target business
concerning a Business Combination and may be unable to complete our initial Business Combination. If we fail to complete our initial Business
Combination, we will never generate any operating revenues.
Past performance by our management team,
our advisors and their respective affiliates, including investments and transactions in which they have participated and businesses with
which they have been associated, may not be indicative of future performance of an investment in the company.
Information regarding our management
team, our advisors and their respective affiliates, including investments and transactions in which they have participated and businesses
with which they have been associated, is presented for informational purposes only. Any past experience and performance by our management
team, our advisors and their respective affiliates and the businesses with which they have been associated, is not a guarantee that we
will be able to successfully identify a suitable candidate for our initial Business Combination, that we will be able to provide positive
returns to our shareholders, or of any results with respect to any initial Business Combination we may consummate. You should not rely
on the historical experiences of our management team, our advisors and their respective affiliates, including investments and transactions
in which they have participated and businesses with which they have been associated, as indicative of the future performance of an investment
in us or as indicative of every prior investment by each of the members of our management team, our advisors or their respective affiliates.
The market price of our securities may be influenced by numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, and our shareholders may
experience losses on their investment in our securities.
Cyber incidents or attacks directed at us
could result in information theft, data corruption, operational disruption and/or financial loss.
We depend on digital technologies,
including information systems, infrastructure and cloud applications and services, including those of third parties with which we may
deal. Sophisticated and deliberate attacks on, or security breaches in, our systems or infrastructure, or the systems or infrastructure
of third parties or the cloud, could lead to corruption or misappropriation of our assets, proprietary information and sensitive or confidential
data. As an early stage company without significant investments in data security protection, we may not be sufficiently protected against
such occurrences. We may not have sufficient resources to adequately protect against, or to investigate and remediate any vulnerability
to, cyber incidents. It is possible that any of these occurrences, or a combination of them, could have adverse consequences on our business
and lead to financial loss.
50
We may be a passive foreign investment company,
or “PFIC,” which could result in adverse United States federal income tax consequences to U.S. investors.
If we are a PFIC for any taxable
year (or portion thereof) that is included in the holding period of a U.S. Holder (as defined in the section of the IPO registration statement
captioned “ Taxation - United States Federal Income Tax Considerations - U.S. Holders ”)
of our Class A Ordinary Shares or warrants, the U.S. Holder may be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences and may be
subject to additional reporting requirements. Our PFIC status for our current and subsequent taxable years may depend on the status of
an acquired company pursuant to a Business Combination and whether we qualify for the PFIC start-up exception (see the section of the
IPO registration statement captioned “ Taxation - United States Federal Income Tax Considerations - U.S.
Holders - Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules ”). Depending on the particular circumstances the application
of the start-up exception may be subject to uncertainty, and there cannot be any assurance that we will qualify for the start-up exception.
Accordingly, there can be no assurances with respect to our status as a PFIC for our current taxable year or any subsequent taxable year.
Our actual PFIC status for any taxable year, however, will not be determinable until after the end of such taxable year. In addition,
our U.S. counsel expresses no opinion with respect to our PFIC status for any taxable year.
Moreover, if we determine we
are a PFIC for any taxable year, upon written request, we will endeavor to provide to a U.S. Holder such information as the Internal Revenue
Service (“IRS”) may require, including a PFIC annual information statement, in order to enable the U.S. Holder to make and
maintain a “qualified electing fund” election, but there can be no assurance that we will timely provide such required information,
and such election would be unavailable with respect to our warrants in all cases. We urge U.S. investors to consult their own tax advisors
regarding the possible application of the PFIC rules. For a more detailed explanation of the tax consequences of PFIC classification to
U.S. Holders, see the section of the IPO registration statement captioned “ Taxation - United States Federal Income
Tax Considerations - U.S. Holders - Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules .”
An investment our securities may result
in uncertain U.S. federal income tax consequences.
An investment in our securities
may result in uncertain U.S. federal income tax consequences. For instance, because there are no authorities that directly address instruments
similar to the units we issued in our IPO, the allocation an investor makes with respect to the purchase price of a unit between
the Class A Ordinary Share and the one-half of one warrant included in each unit could be challenged by the IRS or courts. In addition,
the U.S. federal income tax consequences of a cashless exercise of warrants included in the units we issued in our IPO is unclear
under current law. Finally, it is unclear whether the redemption rights with respect to our Class A Ordinary Shares suspend the running
of a U.S. Holder’s (as defined in section of the IPO registration statement titled “ Taxation — United
States Federal Income Tax Considerations — U.S. Holders ”) holding period for purposes of determining whether
any gain or loss realized by such holder on the sale or exchange of Class A Ordinary Shares is long-term capital gain or loss and for
determining whether any dividend we pay would be considered “qualified dividend income” for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
See the section of our IPO registration statement titled “ Taxation — United States Federal Income Tax Considerations ”
for a summary of the U.S. federal income tax considerations of an investment in our securities. Investors are urged to consult their own
tax advisors with respect to these and other tax consequences when acquiring, owning or disposing of our securities.
We may reincorporate in or transfer by way
of continuation to another jurisdiction which may result in taxes imposed on shareholders or warrant holders.
We may, in connection with
our initial Business Combination or otherwise, subject to requisite shareholder approval by special resolution under the Companies Act
(with respect to which only holders of Class B ordinary shares will have the right to vote), reincorporate in or transfer by way of continuation
to the jurisdiction in which the target company or business is located or in another jurisdiction. The transaction may require a shareholder
or warrant holder to recognize taxable income in the jurisdiction in which the shareholder or warrant holder is a tax resident or in which
its members are resident if it is a tax transparent entity (or may otherwise result in adverse tax consequences). We do not intend to
make any cash distributions to shareholders or warrant holders to pay such taxes. Shareholders or warrant holders may be subject to withholding
taxes or other taxes with respect to their ownership of us after the reincorporation or continuance.
After our initial Business Combination,
it is possible that a majority of our directors and officers will live outside the United States and all of our assets will be located
outside the United States; therefore, investors may not be able to enforce federal securities laws or their other legal rights.
It is possible that after our
initial Business Combination, a majority of our directors and officers will reside outside of the United States and all of our assets
will be located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult, or in some cases not possible, for investors in the United
States to enforce their legal rights, to effect service of process upon all of our directors or officers or to enforce judgments of United
States courts predicated upon civil liabilities and criminal penalties on our directors and officers under United States laws.
51
The 1% U.S. federal excise tax on stock
buybacks could be imposed on redemptions of our stock if we were to become a “covered corporation” in the future.
On August 16, 2022, President
Biden signed into law the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which, among other things, generally imposes a 1% U.S. federal excise tax (the
“Excise Tax”) on certain repurchases of stock by “covered corporations” (which
include publicly traded domestic (i.e., U.S.) corporations and certain domestic subsidiaries of publicly traded foreign (i.e., non-U.S.)
corporations) occurring on or after January 1, 2023. The Excise Tax is imposed on the repurchasing corporation itself, not its holders
from which the stock is repurchased. The amount of the Excise Tax is generally 1% of the fair market value of the shares repurchased at
the time of the repurchase. However, for purposes of calculating the Excise Tax, repurchasing corporations are permitted to net the fair
market value of certain new stock issuances against the fair market value of stock repurchases during the same taxable year. In addition,
certain exceptions apply to the Excise Tax. The U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) has authority to provide
regulations and other guidance to carry out, and prevent the abuse or avoidance of the Excise Tax. On April 12, 2024, the Treasury published
proposed Treasury regulations addressing the Excise Tax. Such proposed Treasury regulations clarify many aspects of the Excise Tax, although
the interpretation and operation of certain other aspects of the Excise Tax remain unclear. Although these proposed Treasury regulations
are not final, taxpayers generally may rely on them until final Treasury regulations are issued.
However, there can be no assurance
that final regulations will not adversely affect the accuracy of the below description of the Excise Tax considerations that may be applicable
to us if we were to become a “covered corporation” in the future.
We are currently not a “covered
corporation” for purposes of the Excise Tax. Accordingly, we generally would not be subject to the Excise Tax on a redemptions of
our stock in connection with an extension of the date by which we must consummate our initial Business Combination or in connection with
our liquidation if we fail to consummate our initial Business Combination by such date. If we were to become a “covered corporation”
in the future, whether in connection with the consummation of our initial Business Combination with a U.S. company (including if we were
to redomicile as a U.S. corporation in connection therewith) or otherwise, whether and to what extent we would be subject to the Excise
Tax on a redemption of our stock would depend on a number of factors, including (i) whether the redemption is treated as a repurchase
of stock for purposes of the Excise Tax, (ii) the fair market value of the redemption treated as a repurchase of stock, (iii) the structure
of our initial Business Combination, (iv) the nature and amount of any “PIPE” or other equity issuances (whether in connection
with our initial Business Combination or otherwise) issued within the same taxable year of a redemption treated as a repurchase of stock
and (v) the content of the final Treasury regulations and other guidance from the Treasury addressing the Excise Tax. As noted above,
the Excise Tax would be payable by the repurchasing corporation, and not by the redeeming holder. If we were to become a “covered
corporation” in the future, the imposition of the Excise Tax on us as a result of redemptions by us could reduce the amount of cash
available to pay redemptions or reduce the cash available to the target business in connection with our initial Business Combination,
which could cause investors in our securities who do not redeem or the other shareholders of the combined company to economically bear
the impact of such Excise Tax.
52
We are an emerging growth company and a
smaller reporting company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and if we take advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements
available to emerging growth companies or smaller reporting companies, this could make our securities less attractive to investors and
may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies.
We are an “emerging growth
company” within the meaning of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions
from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but
not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor internal controls attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from
the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments
not previously approved. As a result, our shareholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. We could be
an emerging growth company for up to five years, although circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier, including if the market
value of our Class A Ordinary Shares held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any June 30 before that time, in which case we
would no longer be an emerging growth company as of the following December 31. We cannot predict whether investors will find our securities
less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result of our reliance
on these exemptions, the trading prices of our securities may be lower than they otherwise would be, there may be a less active trading
market for our securities and the trading prices of our securities may be more volatile.
Further, Section 102(b)(1)
of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until
private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class
of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS
Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging
growth companies but any such an election to opt out is irrevocable. We have elected not to opt out of such extended transition period
which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, we, as an
emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may
make comparison of our financial statements with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth
company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting
standards used.
Additionally, we are a “smaller
reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. Smaller reporting companies may take advantage of certain reduced
disclosure obligations, including, among other things, providing only two years of audited financial statements. We will remain a smaller
reporting company until the last day of the fiscal year in which (1) the market value of our ordinary shares held by non-affiliates is
equal to or exceeds $250 million as of the prior June 30th, and (2) our annual revenues equaled or exceeded $100 million during such completed
fiscal year and the market value of our ordinary shares held by non-affiliates equals to or exceeds $700 million as of the prior June
30th. To the extent we take advantage of such reduced disclosure obligations, it may also make comparison of our financial statements
with other public companies difficult or impossible.
Provisions in our amended and restated memorandum
and articles of association may inhibit a takeover of us, which could limit the price investors might be willing to pay in the future
for our Class A Ordinary Shares and could entrench management.
Our amended and restated memorandum
and articles of association contain provisions that may discourage unsolicited takeover proposals that shareholders may consider to be
in their best interests. These provisions include a staggered board of directors and the ability of the board of directors to designate
the terms of and issue new series of preference shares, which may make the removal of management more difficult and may discourage transactions
that otherwise could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our securities.
53
Our amended and restated memorandum and
articles of association provide that the courts of the Cayman Islands will be the exclusive forums for certain disputes between us and
our shareholders, which could limit our shareholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for complaints against us or
our directors, officers or employees.
Our amended and restated memorandum
and articles of association provide that unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the courts of the Cayman
Islands shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any claim or dispute arising out of or in connection with our amended and restated memorandum
and articles of association or otherwise related in any way to each shareholder’s shareholding in us, including but not limited
to (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of any fiduciary or other
duty owed by any of our current or former director, officer or other employee to us or our shareholders, (iii) any action asserting a
claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Companies Act or our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, or (iv)
any action asserting a claim against us governed by the internal affairs doctrine (as such concept is recognized under the laws of the
United States of America) and that each shareholder irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Cayman Islands
over all such claims or disputes.
The forum selection provision
in our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association does not apply to actions or suits brought to enforce any liability
or duty created by the Securities Act, Exchange Act or any claim for which the federal district courts of the United States of America
are, as a matter of the laws of the United States of America, the sole and exclusive forum for determination of such a claim.
Our amended and restated memorandum
and articles of association also provide that, without prejudice to any other rights or remedies that we may have, each of our shareholders
acknowledges that damages alone would not be an adequate remedy for any breach of the selection of the courts of the Cayman Islands as
exclusive forum and that accordingly we shall be entitled, without proof of special damages, to the remedies of injunction, specific performance
or other equitable relief for any threatened or actual breach of the selection of the courts of the Cayman Islands as exclusive forum.
This choice of forum provision
may increase a shareholder’s cost and limit the shareholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable
for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits against us and our directors, officers
and other employees. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any of our shares or other securities, whether by transfer,
sale, operation of law or otherwise, shall be deemed to have notice of and have irrevocably agreed and consented to these provisions.
There is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such provisions, and the enforceability of similar choice of forum provisions
in other companies’ charter documents has been challenged in legal proceedings. It is possible that a court could find this type
of provisions to be inapplicable or unenforceable, and if a court were to find this provision in our amended and restated memorandum and
articles of association to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving the
dispute in other jurisdictions, which could have adverse effect on our business and financial performance.
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.