Item 1A. Risk Factors
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
Forward-Looking
Statement Categories
The
following categories of statements in this Report are forward-looking, and each is subject to material risks and uncertainties that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those described or implied:
1.
Revenue and Financial Projections.
Statements
that RAD-I’s recurring revenue and gross margin could, on a standalone basis, support positive cash flow operations and management’s
characterization that RAD-I has “achieved a point” at which it could support positive cash flow operations today; that RAD-M
will surpass RAD-I’s monthly recurring revenue contribution at some future point; that subscription gross margin will exceed 75%
and outright-sale gross margin will exceed 50% based on average bill of materials costs and pricing that the market “has appeared
to accept,” each of which is a forward-looking characterization dependent on assumptions about continued pricing acceptance, stable
input costs, and manufacturing scale that may not be realized; that RAD-G will generate substantial revenue from SARA platform licensing;
that RAD-M represents a higher revenue ceiling than stationary solutions; and that penetration of any covered industry would produce
sufficient revenue to support profitability.
2.
Product Development and Commercialization.
Statements
regarding the planned introduction of additional stationary solutions during fiscal year 2027; the establishment of RAD Europe during
fiscal 2027 and the anticipated benefits thereof; all statements regarding ROAMEO’s commercial viability, autonomous operation
without on-site human pilots, production ramp, and revenue trajectory following commencement of commercial billing in May 2026; statements
regarding planned RAD-I product introductions, including their timing, features, and market acceptance; and statements regarding expansion
of the authorized dealer network and anticipated contributions from the dealer channel.
3.
Market and Industry Characterizations.
All
characterizations of the physical security industry as undergoing a structural transition analogous to Industry 4.0; assertions that
the human-guard labor model is experiencing unsustainable cost pressures; characterizations of the total addressable market for AI-driven
and autonomous security solutions; any implication that competitive dynamics will favor the Company; and the “RAD Town” concept
in its entirety, which is a conceptual design target and strategic roadmap, not a contracted project, existing deployment, or assured
business outcome.
- 9 -
Table of Contents
4.
SARA Platform and Agentic AI.
All
characterizations of SARA as an agentic AI platform enabling autonomous real-time action without continuous human intervention, including
the Item 1 description that SARA enables devices to “perceive, decide, communicate, and act autonomously in real time, without
continuous human intervention,” which states this as a present operational characteristic rather than design intent and should
be read in light of the actual performance qualifications in this Item 1A; statements regarding SARA licensing and commercialization
with third-party hardware manufacturers and monitoring platforms (including the Immix integration); anticipated expansion of the dealer
network and platform ecosystem; statements regarding SARA’s performance in detection, escalation, and response workflows; the characterization
in Item 1 that the firearm detection analytic “identifies visible handguns and long guns in real time,” which omits the design-intent
and environmental-conditions qualifications that investors should consider when evaluating this statement; and all characterizations
of RAD-G’s sales funnel as “substantial” or of management’s expectations for RAD-G revenue as “high.”
Industry award recognitions do not constitute validation of product safety, efficacy, or commercial viability.
5.
Management Estimates and Unaudited Financial Characterizations.
The
approximate $20 million cumulative ROAMEO development figure is a management estimate not audited or reviewed by the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm. Segment-level profitability and cash flow characterizations for RAD-I—including
management’s characterization in Item 1 that RAD-I “has achieved a point” at which its recurring revenue and gross
margin could support positive cash flow operations today—are based on internal analysis for which no separately audited financial
statements are published. This characterization excludes all expenses not directly attributable to the stationary solutions business,
including shared corporate overhead, interest expense, and investment in RAD-M and RAD-G, and does not indicate that the Company as a
whole operates at or near positive cash flow. No financial characterization of any individual subsidiary should be treated as audited
data. Characterizations of gross margin expectations are based on average bill of materials costs and market pricing over limited historical
periods, as well as pricing that the market “has appeared to accept,” and may not be representative of future results.
6.
International Expansion.
Statements
regarding the anticipated establishment of RAD Europe during fiscal 2027; expected benefits of RAD Lanka’s Port City Colombo status,
including cost efficiency and tax benefits; and anticipated GDPR-compliant service capabilities to be provided through RAD Europe. All
such forward-looking statements are subject to regulatory, legal, and operational risks inherent in international expansion.
ADDITIONAL
MATERIAL RISK FACTORS
In
addition to the forward-looking statement categories described above, investors should carefully consider the following material risk
factors. Each could cause actual results, financial condition, or business performance to differ materially from those described or implied
in this Report. These risk factors reflect the Company’s business as described in Item 1 of this Annual Report and the disclosures
made in prior AITX periodic and current filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This list is not exhaustive, and additional
risks not currently anticipated by management may emerge.
- 10 -
Table of Contents
I.
FINANCIAL AND GOING CONCERN RISKS
Substantial
Doubt About the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.
The
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has included an explanatory paragraph in its audit reports expressing substantial
doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred recurring net losses, has a history
of negative operating cash flows, and carries an accumulated deficit that, as of recent reporting periods, has exceeded $171 million.
The Company’s total liabilities substantially exceed its total assets, and it maintains negative stockholders’ equity. These
conditions raise material uncertainty as to whether the Company will be able to meet its obligations as they come due. The Company’s
financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible effects on the classification or carrying value of assets
and liabilities that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to generate
sufficient revenue, raise adequate capital, or otherwise secure the resources necessary to continue operations beyond the near term.
The
Company Requires Continued External Financing and May Be Unable to Obtain It on Acceptable Terms or at All.
The
Company’s operations are not yet self-funding. The Company has relied, and expects to continue to rely, on external debt and equity
financing to fund operations, capital expenditures, product development, and the planned production ramp of ROAMEO and other new products.
A significant portion of the Company’s debt has historically been owed to entities controlled by a single individual, creating
concentrated lender risk and potential conflicts of interest. The Company has also utilized equity financing arrangements, including
agreements providing for the issuance of common shares at variable prices, to access capital. If the Company is unable to obtain financing
on acceptable terms—or if existing financing arrangements are not renewed or are terminated—the Company may be required to
curtail or cease operations, defer planned capital expenditures (including the ROAMEO production ramp and RAD Europe establishment),
reduce headcount, or otherwise alter its operating plans in ways that could materially harm its business and prospects.
The
Company’s Common Stock Is Subject to Substantial Dilution Risk.
The
Company has issued, and may continue to issue, substantial numbers of shares of common stock in connection with financing transactions,
employee and director compensation, debt conversions, and other purposes. As of February 28, 2026, total common shares outstanding exceeded
267 million (post-reverse-split). In March 2026, FINRA processed a 100-for-1 reverse stock split; however, the authorized share count
remains at approximately 12 billion shares, preserving the structural capacity for future dilutive issuances. Variable-price equity financing
arrangements and debt conversion rights may result in issuances at prices below the then-current market price of the Company’s
common stock, causing material dilution to existing shareholders. The reverse stock split does not alter the underlying financial condition
of the Company or reduce the potential for future dilutive issuances. The Company does not provide assurance that future equity issuances
will not substantially reduce the proportionate ownership or economic interest of existing stockholders.
The
Company Has a History of Net Losses and Cannot Assure Future Profitability.
The
Company has not achieved profitability in any fiscal year. Net loss for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2026 were approximately $14.5
million. Operating expenses—including research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative costs—have
consistently exceeded gross profit, and interest expense on the Company’s debt obligations represents an additional recurring charge.
While gross margin on deployed subscription units has improved and the Company’s Solutions-as-a-Service model is designed to produce
improving margins at scale, the Company’s operating cost structure, investment in ROAMEO commercialization, RAD-G platform development,
and debt service obligations may prevent it from achieving profitability even as revenues increase. No assurance can be given as to whether
or when the Company will achieve or sustain profitability.
- 11 -
Table of Contents
Gross
Margin Expectations May Not Be Achieved.
Item
1 of this Report states that subscription gross margin “will exceed” 75% and outright-sale gross margin “will exceed”
50% over deployment lifecycles, based on average bill of materials costs and pricing that the market “has appeared to accept”—language
that reflects observed pricing acceptance rather than contracted or assured revenue, and that is itself a forward-looking characterization.
These expectations assume continued pricing acceptance, no material input cost increases, manufacturing cost improvements associated
with scale, and the absence of significant warranty, maintenance, or retrieval costs on churned units. To date, hardware gross margins
have been achieved under small-batch production conditions. None of these assumptions are guaranteed, and actual gross margins may differ
materially, particularly during the ROAMEO production ramp period when per-unit manufacturing costs may be higher than at scale.
II.
OPERATIONAL AND PRODUCT RISKS
ROAMEO
Commercial Deployment and Production Ramp Involve Significant Execution Risk.
The
Company commenced commercial billing on ROAMEO units in May 2026 following what management estimates to be approximately $20 million
in cumulative development investment. ROAMEO is a fully autonomous, outdoor mobile security vehicle operating without on-site human pilots,
and its commercial viability depends on the continued reliable performance of its autonomous navigation stack, on-board sensor systems,
cellular and 5G connectivity, and full integration with the SARA agentic AI platform in real-world field conditions. Initial commercial
deployments are at a limited number of enterprise customer sites. Scaling ROAMEO to meet broader commercial demand will require significant
expansion of the Company’s production capacity and manufacturing operations, neither of which has been demonstrated at commercial
scale. Mechanical failures, software defects, connectivity disruptions, navigation errors, environmental limitations, or other operational
issues experienced by deployed ROAMEO units could damage the Company’s reputation, result in contract terminations, expose the
Company to liability, and materially impair the Company’s ability to achieve the revenue projections attributed to the RAD-M business.
Management’s statements that RAD-M will surpass RAD-I’s revenue contribution are forward-looking and dependent on successful
execution of each of these steps.
The
Company’s Revenue Is Highly Concentrated and Dependent on Subscription Renewals.
Substantially
all of the Company’s revenue is derived from recurring monthly subscription contracts, typically with initial terms of twelve months.
Customer retention and subscription renewal are critical to the Company’s revenue stability and growth. A single customer has at
times represented a disproportionate share of the Company’s revenue—one customer has previously accounted for approximately
47% of six-month revenue. The loss of one or more significant customers, a material reduction in subscription renewal rates, a failure
to maintain service quality levels that support renewals, or disruption to services provided to the Fortune Top 10 enterprise customer
or any large enterprise account could materially and adversely affect the Company’s revenue, cash flow, and operating results.
The Company retains ownership of hardware deployed under subscription contracts; accordingly, subscriber churn results not only in revenue
loss but also in costs associated with device retrieval, redeployment, or write-down.
The
Company’s Hardware Manufacturing Operations Are Subject to Supply Chain, Capacity, and Quality Risks.
The
Company performs final assembly, system integration, software loading, and quality assurance at its facility in Ferndale, Michigan, and
sources sub-components—including machined metal and plastic components, printed circuit boards, and selected sub-assemblies—from
domestic and international suppliers. The Company’s hardware gross margins to date have been produced under small-batch production
conditions, and the ability to achieve projected margin improvements depends on production volume increases that have not yet been demonstrated.
A disruption affecting one or more key suppliers, an inability to secure critical components at acceptable prices, quality defects, or
a failure to scale manufacturing capacity to meet demand could delay product deployments, increase costs, reduce gross margins, and impair
the Company’s ability to fulfill customer commitments. International supply chain disruptions, tariff changes, or export control
regulations affecting components sourced from outside the United States could have a material adverse effect on component availability
and cost. These risks are heightened during the ROAMEO production ramp, when any manufacturing bottleneck would directly constrain the
Company’s ability to generate revenue from its highest-anticipated growth segment.
- 12 -
Table of Contents
The
RAD-R Residential Business Has Underperformed and Presents Ongoing Uncertainty.
The
Company’s RAD-R subsidiary, which operates the RADCam residential security product, generated an immaterial amount of consolidated
revenue during fiscal 2026, substantially below the Company’s expectations. The Company attributes this underperformance primarily
to the structural differences between its B2B-oriented sales model and the consumer marketing investment required to compete in the B2C
residential channel. The Company has no immediate plans to discontinue the RADCam product but has not committed to the additional consumer
marketing spend management believes would be required to compete effectively. Although the Company has modified the residential software
for deployment into small-and-medium business and enterprise markets through RAD-I, there can be no assurance that this repositioning
will generate material revenue. The RAD-R segment may continue to generate losses, and the Company’s assessment of the segment’s
strategic value may change in ways that result in impairment charges, operational restructuring, or reallocation of capital.
New
Product Introductions and RAD Europe Establishment Are Subject to Execution Risk.
The
Company has stated its intention to introduce additional stationary solutions during fiscal year 2027 and to establish RAD Europe during
the same period. Both initiatives involve engineering, regulatory, operational, and commercial risks that could delay or prevent their
realization. New product introductions may be delayed by supply chain constraints, manufacturing challenges, software development setbacks,
or unfavorable customer reception. The establishment of RAD Europe will require legal entity formation, regulatory compliance infrastructure,
staffing, and local market development in a new geography. There can be no assurance that either initiative will proceed on the stated
timeline or will produce the anticipated revenue contribution.
III.
TECHNOLOGY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RISKS
The
Company’s AI and Autonomous Technology May Not Perform as Described or Expected.
The
SARA platform and the Company’s suite of AI-driven security products rely on large language model architecture, machine learning
models, computer vision analytics, autonomous decision-making systems, and voice interaction capabilities. AI systems of this nature
are subject to known limitations, including errors in detection or classification, failure to perform reliably across varied environmental
conditions, susceptibility to adversarial inputs, and performance degradation as the threat landscape or deployment environment changes.
Item 1 of this Report states that SARA enables devices to “perceive, decide, communicate, and act autonomously in real time, without
continuous human intervention” — describing this as a present operational characteristic. Investors should understand that
this characterization reflects design intent under supported field conditions; deployed systems may require more human oversight than
described in certain situations and may not consistently deliver the autonomous escalation, voice intervention, and first-responder coordination
described in this Report. Item 1 also states that the Company’s firearm detection analytic “identifies visible handguns and
long guns in real time”—an unqualified performance claim. Actual detection accuracy and response performance are subject
to environmental conditions, image quality, and system configuration; the Company does not represent that the analytic will detect all
firearms in all conditions, and the ASTORS award recognition does not constitute independent validation of detection accuracy rates or
performance specifications. Failures of the Company’s AI systems to detect threats, correctly identify individuals or vehicles,
or appropriately escalate or de-escalate situations could result in harm to persons or property, exposure to liability, and damage to
the Company’s reputation and customer relationships. Industry award recognitions referenced in this Report do not constitute validation
of the safety, accuracy, or commercial efficacy of any product.
- 13 -
Table of Contents
The
Company Relies on Trade Secrets and Confidentiality Protections Rather Than Patents and May Be Unable to Adequately Protect Its Intellectual
Property.
The
Company does not currently rely materially on patent protection for its hardware designs, software, firmware, AI models, the SARA platform,
autonomous navigation stack, or related technology. Instead, the Company relies on trade secret protection, confidentiality and invention-assignment
agreements with employees and contractors, copyrights, and trademark registrations. These protections may be insufficient to prevent
misappropriation, reverse engineering, or independent development of competing technologies by third parties. Confidentiality agreements
may be breached; trade secret protections may prove difficult to enforce, particularly across international jurisdictions; and employees
or contractors with access to the Company’s proprietary systems, code, or AI models may depart and join competitors or establish
competing businesses. The Company’s Sri Lanka operations at RAD Lanka introduce additional jurisdictional complexity with respect
to IP enforcement. If the Company’s intellectual property is misappropriated or independently replicated, the Company may lose
the technological differentiation that underpins its competitive positioning.
Cybersecurity
Incidents Could Compromise the Company’s Products, Customer Data, and Operations.
The
Company’s products are connected to the internet and to customer networks, and the SARA platform and related cloud services process
and transmit data from deployed devices—including video, audio, and access-control information—across an expanding footprint
of connected devices. Although the Company has achieved and maintained SOC 2 Type 2 status since February 2025, cybersecurity certifications
do not guarantee the absence of vulnerabilities or the prevention of successful attacks. A breach of the Company’s systems, a compromise
of deployed customer devices, or a successful attack on the SARA platform could result in unauthorized access to sensitive data, disruption
of device functionality at customer sites, customer contract terminations, regulatory scrutiny, litigation, and significant reputational
damage. The Company’s cybersecurity posture will require ongoing investment as threats evolve, as ROAMEO deployments expand the
number of connected autonomous vehicles in the field, and as RAD Europe operations increase the Company’s exposure to GDPR and
other international data protection regimes.
The
SARA Platform May Not Achieve the Commercial Adoption Anticipated by RAD-G.
RAD-G’s
business model depends substantially on expanding the SARA ecosystem through licensing and integration arrangements with third-party
hardware manufacturers, monitoring platforms (including central station platforms such as Immix), dealers, and enterprise end users.
The commercial success of RAD-G depends on third parties choosing to integrate SARA into their products, platforms, and workflows—decisions
that are outside the Company’s control and that may not materialize on the timeline or at the scale management anticipates. The
RAD-G sales funnel, characterized by management as substantial for an early-stage AI platform business, has not yet produced revenue
commensurate with management’s expectations. Competition from large, well-funded AI technology companies with greater distribution
and integration resources could impair RAD-G’s ability to establish SARA as a platform-of-choice in the physical security ecosystem.
IV.
MARKET, COMPETITIVE, AND REGULATORY RISKS
The
Company Operates in a Competitive Market and Faces Competition from Larger, Better-Capitalized Companies.
The
Company competes across three distinct but related markets: traditional guard services and manned monitoring; legacy passive security
hardware (cameras, access control devices, alarm systems); and an emerging set of AI-driven and autonomous security technology companies.
Many of the Company’s actual and potential competitors have substantially greater financial resources, brand recognition, established
distribution networks, and installed customer bases than the Company. Large security integrators and major technology companies may develop,
license, or acquire AI and autonomous security capabilities that compete directly with the Company’s products and platform. The
market characterizations in this Report—including statements that incumbent competitors are “structurally disadvantaged”
or that legacy vendors “typically lack” agentic AI capability—reflect management’s view and are not statements
of established fact. Competitive dynamics may develop in ways unfavorable to the Company, including through technological advances by
competitors, price compression across the autonomous security category, or the market entry of well-capitalized technology companies.
- 14 -
Table of Contents
Deployment
of Autonomous Security Devices Is Subject to Evolving Legal, Regulatory, and Privacy Constraints.
The
Company’s products deploy autonomous devices—including outdoor mobile robotic vehicles (ROAMEO), vehicle access management
systems (AVA), visitor management systems (TOM), and AI-enabled cameras (ROSA, RIO, RAM, RADCam)—that collect audio, video, biometric,
and identification data in commercial, residential, industrial, and potentially public-access environments. The legal framework governing
the collection and processing of such data is complex, rapidly evolving, and varies significantly across jurisdictions. Applicable regulations
include state biometric privacy statutes (such as the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act), the California Consumer Privacy Act,
GDPR as applicable to the Company’s anticipated European operations through RAD Europe, and various other federal, state, and local
privacy and data protection laws. Autonomous vehicles and robotic platforms operating in public or semi-public spaces may be subject
to licensing, permitting, insurance, or operational requirements that vary by municipality, state, or country. The Company’s anticipated
establishment of RAD Europe during fiscal 2027 will directly increase its exposure to GDPR compliance obligations. Failure to comply
with applicable laws and regulations could result in regulatory enforcement actions, fines, litigation, mandatory product modifications,
or constraints on the Company’s ability to operate or deploy products in affected markets.
Market
Adoption of AI-Driven and Autonomous Security Solutions May Be Slower Than Management Anticipates.
The
Company’s business plan assumes that customers in the physical security market will adopt AI-driven and autonomous solutions at
a pace and scale consistent with management’s view of the industry’s structural transition. This assumption may not prove
correct. Customers may be slower than expected to replace human guard labor or legacy surveillance systems with automated alternatives,
whether due to risk aversion, labor union obligations, insurance requirements, regulatory constraints, concerns about AI reliability,
or other factors. The “RAD Town” concept—in which the Company’s portfolio of stationary and mobile products operates
as an integrated autonomous-security fabric across a campus or jurisdiction—is a long-term design target, not an existing deployment
or contracted commercial arrangement. The analogies drawn in this Report to Industry 4.0 transitions in other sectors are management’s
narrative framework and may not accurately predict the pace or trajectory of adoption in the physical security industry. Slower-than-anticipated
adoption would adversely affect the Company’s ability to achieve its revenue projections and extend the period during which the
Company requires external financing.
Government
and Municipal Markets Present Additional Regulatory and Procurement Risks.
The
Company’s end-user base includes government entities, and the Company has identified government as a target vertical market. Government
procurement cycles are typically longer and more complex than commercial sales cycles, are subject to appropriations risk and political
change, and may require certifications, clearances, or compliance with specific regulatory frameworks (including federal cybersecurity
standards) that the Company may not currently hold or may be unable to obtain. Autonomous security devices deployed in public or government-managed
spaces may attract heightened public and regulatory scrutiny regarding civil liberties, facial recognition, and autonomous decision-making
in law enforcement-adjacent contexts. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully compete for or retain government
contracts.
V.
MANAGEMENT, PERSONNEL, AND KEY PERSON RISKS
The
Company Is Dependent on Key Personnel, Particularly Its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer.
The
Company’s success is substantially dependent on the continued services of Steven Reinharz, who serves as both Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Technology Officer and is the founder of RAD and its principal architect. Steven Reinharz is also the Company’s single
largest equity holder and plays a central role in product strategy, customer relationships, investor relations, and industry positioning,
including through his service on the Board of the Security Industry Association and chairmanship of its Autonomous Working Group. Item
1 of this Report states that Steven Reinharz has “written and spoken extensively” about the physical security industry’s
structural transformation since the Company’s inception and is a “regular speaker” at events hosted by SIA and ASIS,
the two leading industry organizations. This public profile, while reflecting genuine industry standing, further concentrates the Company’s
market credibility and industry positioning in a single individual; any reputational, health, or availability issue affecting Steven
Reinharz could have an outsized adverse effect on the Company’s relationships with customers, partners, dealers, and investors
beyond the direct operational impact of his absence. The combined CEO and CTO role concentrates both business leadership and technical
architecture in a single individual. The loss of Steven Reinharz, or any material reduction in his involvement in the Company’s
business, could have a severe and potentially irreversible adverse effect on the Company. The Company does not currently represent that
it has key-person insurance sufficient to compensate for this risk, and the ability to recruit a suitable replacement would be highly
uncertain given the specialized combination of technical, operational, and strategic capabilities involved.
- 15 -
Table of Contents
The
Company’s Ability to Attract and Retain Qualified Technical, Sales, and Operational Personnel Is Critical.
The
Company has approximately 135 employees across the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Asia, including Sri Lanka, and its
operations depend on specialized technical expertise in robotics engineering, AI development, autonomous systems, software architecture,
and security operations. Competition for qualified engineers and AI talent is intense. The loss of other senior technical, sales, or
operational personnel could disrupt operations and product development. The Company’s culture—centered on emotional intelligence,
accountability, and multidisciplinary ownership—is described by management as a meaningful operational asset, but there can be
no assurance that the Company can maintain this culture or retain key team members as it scales, particularly during periods of capital
constraint, extended development timelines, or operational setbacks.
The
Company’s International Operations Introduce Additional Risks.
The
Company currently operates internationally through RAD Lanka, a Sri Lanka subsidiary operating within the Port City Colombo special economic
zone, and has team members in the United Kingdom and Asia. The Company anticipates establishing RAD Europe during fiscal 2027 to support
European market entry and GDPR-compliant service delivery. International operations expose the Company to risks including currency fluctuation,
geopolitical instability, changes in local tax and regulatory regimes, difficulty enforcing contracts or intellectual property rights
in foreign jurisdictions, and the operational complexity of managing distributed teams across multiple time zones and legal systems.
The special economic zone status under which RAD Lanka operates may be subject to changes in Sri Lankan law or policy. The anticipated
benefits of RAD Lanka’s Port City Colombo status, including cost efficiency and tax advantages, are not guaranteed to continue.
There can be no assurance that the Company’s international expansion will proceed as planned or that the anticipated benefits of
international operations will be realized.
VI.
SECURITIES AND INVESTOR RISKS
The
Company’s Common Stock Trades on the OTC Pink Market and Is Subject to Significant Volatility and Liquidity Constraints.
The
Company’s common stock is quoted on the OTC Pink marketplace under the symbol “AITX,” which is not a registered national
securities exchange. OTC Pink securities are generally subject to less rigorous disclosure and listing standards than exchange-listed
securities, and the market for such securities may be less liquid, more volatile, and more susceptible to manipulation than exchange-listed
markets. Shareholders may find it difficult to buy or sell shares at prices that reflect the Company’s intrinsic value, and bid-ask
spreads may be wide. The Company’s stock price has been, and may continue to be, highly volatile in response to operating results,
financing transactions, product announcements, press releases regarding ROAMEO deployments or RAD-G partnerships, and general market
conditions. The March 2026 reverse stock split (100-for-1) does not guarantee any improvement in trading liquidity, price stability,
or long-term shareholder value. Investors in OTC Pink securities should be aware that such investments carry a high degree of risk, and
the Company’s shares should be considered highly speculative.
Insider
and Related-Party Transactions Represent Potential Conflicts of Interest.
Approximately
96% of the Company’s total loans payable has, at recent reporting dates, been owed to entities controlled by a single individual.
Related-party lending of this concentration creates potential conflicts of interest between the interests of that lender and the broader
shareholder base, including with respect to the terms of any refinancing, conversion, restructuring, or settlement of such indebtedness.
Transactions between the Company and related parties may not be negotiated at arm’s length, and the Company’s ability to
obtain independent third-party financing to refinance related-party debt on terms favorable to all shareholders is uncertain. Steven
Reinharz, as CEO, CTO, and the Company’s single largest equity holder, may have interests that diverge from those of other stockholders
in certain circumstances. The Company’s governance framework may not fully mitigate these potential conflicts, and investors should
be aware that the interests of related-party lenders and controlling stockholders may not always be aligned with those of the broader
shareholder base.
- 16 -
Table of Contents
The
Company’s Prior and Ongoing Use of Variable-Price Equity Financing Creates Structural Dilution Risk.
The
Company has historically utilized equity financing arrangements that provide for the issuance of common shares at variable prices, including
at prices below the then-prevailing market price. These arrangements have contributed to the Company’s substantial share count
(in excess of 267 million shares post-reverse-split) and have resulted in material dilution to existing shareholders. Although the Company
completed a 100-for-1 reverse stock split in March 2026, the authorized share count of approximately 12 billion shares remains unchanged,
preserving the structural capacity to issue additional shares. Continued reliance on these financing mechanisms—which may be required
to fund ongoing operations, the ROAMEO production ramp, RAD-G platform development, or RAD Europe establishment—could result in
further dilution and downward pressure on the trading price of the Company’s common stock.
General
Disclaimer Applicable to All Risk Factors
The
risk factors described in this Item 1A are not exhaustive. Additional risks not currently anticipated by management, or risks that management
does not currently consider material, may emerge and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial
condition, results of operations, and stock price. The magnitude of any individual risk factor, and the interaction among risk factors,
cannot be predicted with certainty. This Item 1A should be read in conjunction with the Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Information at the front of this Report, Item 1 (Business), Item 7 (Management’s Discussion and Analysis), and the financial statements
and notes thereto. Nothing in this Report constitutes investment, legal, tax, or financial advice. Investors should consult their own
advisors before making any investment decision with respect to the Company’s securities.
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.