What changed in this filing

/stocks — the workspaceLOADING

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

2023-03-17 compared with 2022-09-14 · 8 added, 67 removed, 1 unchanged (99% of the section changed)

Company terminated sales representatives Daniel Pepock (“Pepock”) and Tracy Yourke (“Yourke”) effective June

June 6, 2022, Pepock filed a Complaint against Organicell Regenerative Medicine, Inc.

(“Organicell”) in the Court of

Common Pleas of Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania.

Organicell removed the case to the United States District Court for the Western

District of Pennsylvania, and on July 15, 2022 Mr.

Pepock filed an Amended Complaint asserting two counts.

I alleges a claim for “Breach of Employment Agreement, including Violation of the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law.”

Pepock alleges that Organicell (i) failed to pay him certain wages in timely manner;

(ii) failed to pay him commissions allegedly

(iii) failed to pay him a severance benefit allegedly due;

and (iv) improperly paid him as a 1099 “independent contractor”

rather than a W-2 employee for the time period of January 1, 2020 through July 31, 2021.

Pepock sought damages of $235,000

in compensation, plus compensation for alleged increased tax rates and decreased Social Security contributions, liquidated damages, costs

of litigation including reasonable attorney fees and witness fees, interest on the judgment, plus any other relief the Court deems proper.

II alleges a claim for “Fair Labor Standards Act Retaliatory Discharge.

Pepock alleged that he was unlawfully terminated

in retaliation for filing a complaint about unpaid wages and sought damages in an unidentified amount of lost wage compensation, back

pay, front pay, liquidated damages, compensation for pain and suffering and other non-economic damages, punitive damages, costs of litigation

including reasonable attorney fees and witness fees, interest on the judgment, plus any other relief the Court deems proper.

June 27, 2022, Ms.

Yourke filed a complaint against Organicell in the State of Michigan, 6 th Judicial Circuit, County

Organicell removed the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division,

and on August 10, 2022 Ms.

Yourke filed an Amended Complaint asserting three counts.

I and II alleged claims for “Breach of Employment Agreement and Violation of Michigan Sales Representative Commission Act.

Yourke alleged that Organicell (i) failed to pay her certain wages in timely manner;

(ii) failed to pay her commissions allegedly

(iii) failed to pay her a severance benefit allegedly due;

and (iv) improperly treated her as a 1099 “independent contractor”

rather than a W-2 employee for the time period of January 1, 2020 through July 31, 2021, April 16-30, 2022, and May 1, 2022 through June

Yourke sought an unidentified amount of damages in the form of compensation, commissions, treble damages, plus compensation

for an alleged increased tax rates and increased Social Security contributions, costs of litigation, including actual attorney fees and

witness fees, interest on the judgment, plus any other legal and equitable relief that the Court deems proper.

III alleged a claim for “Fair Labor Standards Act Retaliatory Discharge.

Yourke alleged that she was unlawfully terminated

in retaliation for filing a complaint about unpaid wages and sought damages in an unidentified amount of lost wage compensation, back

pay, front pay, liquidated damages, compensation for pain and suffering and other non-economic damages, punitive damages, costs of litigation

including reasonable attorney fees and witness fees, interest on the judgment, plus any other relief the Court deems proper.

of July 31, 2022, all past due wages to Pepock and Yourke were paid.

Pepock’s action against Organicell was designated for placement into the United States District Court’s Alternative Dispute

Resolution program and the Parties agreed to mediate.

On August 22, 2022, Mr.

Yourke and Organicell agreed to a material

settlement term sheet (“Settlement”) which provided for the resolution and full settlement and release of all claims among

the parties and for the Company to buy back all of the shares of common stock of the Company issued to and owned by Mr.

Pepock and Ms.

Yourke at the time of the Settlement (represented by Mr.

Pepock and Ms.

Yourke to be in excess of 24,800,000 shares) in exchange

for a payment by the Company of $500,000.

In addition, the Company agreed to release Mr.

Pepock and Ms.

Yourke from their non-compete

restrictions upon the execution of a Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release.

The Settlement relates to disputed claims

and nothing therein shall be construed as an admission of liability or wrongdoing by the Company or any other party.

addition to matters previously reported in our periodic filings under the Exchange Act, from time to time, we may become involved in

various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business.

Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties,

and an adverse result in any such matter may harm our business.

Legal Proceedings.

In addition to matters which have been resolved as we reported in previous filings under the Exchange Act, from time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business.

Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in any such matter may harm our business.

Risk Factors.

a “ smaller reporting company ”

we are not required to disclose information under this Item .

Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

upon Senior Securities

Safety Disclosures

As a “ smaller reporting company ” we are not required to disclose information under this Item .

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Defaults upon Senior Securities

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.

What changed 10-Q

Item 1. Legal Proceedings