10 unchanged sentences
legal fees and other directly related costs expected to be incurred.
−Removed: Settlement of Consolidated
−Removed: Securities Class Action
−Removed: As previously disclosed,
−Removed: on April 29, 2020, a securities class action case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
−Removed: against us and our former CEO.
−Removed: The action is captioned Daniel Yannes, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated vs.
−Removed: Subsequently, two additional class actions were filed in the same court (Leeburn v.
−Removed: SCWorx, et ano.
−Removed: and Leonard v.
−Removed: SCWorx et ano.) and thereafter, the three class actions were consolidated (the “Consolidated Class Action”).
−Removed: The Consolidated Class Action alleged that our company and our former CEO misled investors in connection with our April 13, 2020 press
−Removed: release with respect to the sale of COVID-19 rapid test kits.
−Removed: As previously disclosed,
−Removed: on February 11, 2022, the parties entered into a Stipulation of Settlement (subject to Court approval) to settle the Consolidated Class
−Removed: The settlement resolves all claims asserted against SCWorx and the other named defendant without any admission, concession or
−Removed: finding of any fault, liability or wrongdoing by the Company or any defendant.
−Removed: Under the terms of this agreement, (i) the insurers for
−Removed: the Company and Marc Schessel (former CEO) will make a cash payment to the class plaintiffs (ii) the former CEO will transfer 100,000
−Removed: shares of company common stock to the class plaintiffs, and (iii) the Company will issue $600,000 worth of common stock to the class plaintiffs,
−Removed: in exchange for which all parties will be released from all claims related to the securities class action litigation.
−Removed: After giving effect
−Removed: to the share issuance by the Company, the Company believes that it will have satisfied the accrued retention liability of $700,000.
−Removed: order dated March 22, 2022, the Court granted preliminary approval of the class action.
−Removed: After a fairness hearing held on June 29, 2022,
−Removed: the Court approved the Stipulation of Settlement.
CorProminence d/b/a Core IR v.
AAA Arbitration Case 01-22-0001-5709
−Removed: As previously disclosed, on April 25, 2022, the
−Removed: Company received a Demand for Arbitration along with a Statement of Claim filed by Core IR with the American Arbitration Association seeking
−Removed: damages in the amount of approximately $190,000.00 arising out of a marketing and consulting agreement.
−Removed: The Company filed its answer,
−Removed: affirmative defenses and counterclaims on May 16, 2022.
−Removed: By order of the arbitrator dated November 1, 2022, Core IR received permission
−Removed: to amend its Statement of Claim to increase its request for damages to $257,545.63.
−Removed: The arbitration hearing commences on March 20, 2023
−Removed: and will continue through March 24, 2023.
+Added: As previously disclosed in the Company’s periodic reports filed
+Added: with the SEC, on April 25, 2022, the Company received a Demand for Arbitration along with a Statement of Claim filed by Core IR with the
+Added: American Arbitration Association seeking damages in the amount of approximately $190,000.
+Added: arising out of a marketing and consulting
+Added: The Company filed its answer, affirmative defenses and counterclaims on May 16, 2022.
+Added: By order of the arbitrator dated November
+Added: 1, 2022, Core IR received permission to amend its Statement of Claim to increase its request for damages to $257,546.
+Added: The Company received
+Added: the final decision of the Arbitrator on October 16, 2023, awarding Core IR $461,856 including unpaid compensation, indemnification for
+Added: legal fees and costs, prevailing party legal fees and interest (the “Award”).
+Added: Core IR has since obtained a judgement in the
+Added: amount of approximately $502,000 (including interest) (“Judgement”).
+Added: The Company and Core IR entered into a settlement agreement
+Added: dated July 12, 2024 under which the Company agreed to issue Core IR shares of its common stock with a value of $502,000 (determined based
+Added: on sales proceeds realized by Core IR), in full and complete satisfaction of the Judgement.
+Added: The settlement agreement is filed as exhibit
+Added: 10.5 to this annual report on Form 10-K.
Hadrian Equities Partners, LLC et ano.
22-cv-07096 (JLR) (S.D.N.Y)
−Removed: On August 19, 2022, Hadrian Equities Partners,
−Removed: LLC and the Phillip W.
−Removed: 2007 Irrevocable Trust filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District
−Removed: of New York alleging that SCWorx was dilatory and did not comply with its alleged contractual duties to remove the restrictions from Plaintiffs’
−Removed: converted AMMA stock to SCWorx stock until August 10 and August 11, 2020.
−Removed: Plaintiffs allege that as a result, they were unable to sell
−Removed: their SCWorx stock when SCWorx was trading at its highest price on April 13, 2020.
−Removed: The Complaint seeks $500,000 in damages.
−Removed: Complaint has not been served.
−Removed: Upon review of the Complaint, SCWorx counsel provided Plaintiffs’ counsel with a “safe harbor”
−Removed: Notice of Motion for sanctions pursuant to Fed.
−Removed: 11 and letter explaining that the material allegations in the Complaint are
−Removed: false inasmuch as the restrictions on Plaintiffs’ SCWorx shares were removed on April 21, 2020– after months of waiting for
−Removed: Plaintiffs to supply the correct documents with accurate information so that outside counsel could provide an opinion and clear the stocks
−Removed: The “safe harbor” letter and Notice of Motion gave Plaintiffs 21 days to withdraw the Complaint.
−Removed: for and receiving several extensions in addition to the 21 days, Plaintiffs have not withdrawn the Complaint and thus, a Motion for Sanctions
−Removed: was filed by SCWorx on November 4, 2022.
−Removed: After the motion for sanctions was filed, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint on November 28,
−Removed: On February 6, 2023, SCWorx filed its answer to the Amended Complaint interposing numerous defenses.
−Removed: SCWorx is awaiting a decision
−Removed: from the Court on its Motion for Sanctions.
−Removed: Other Investigations
−Removed: As previously disclosed, on or about April 6,
−Removed: 2022, the Company reached a settlement in principle with the SEC Staff which, subject to a few changes, was subsequently approved by the
−Removed: Commission in which the Company agreed to resolve the SEC’s investigation regarding the April 13, 2020 press release and related
−Removed: disclosures (related to Covid-19 rapid test kits) through the Company’s payment of (a) a civil monetary penalty of $125,000, payable
−Removed: in 4 equal installments over 12 months and (b) disgorgement of $471,000 and prejudgment interest in the amount of $32,761.56 which payment
−Removed: is to be deemed satisfied by the transfer by the Company, no later than 30 days after the entry of the Class Distribution Order in the
−Removed: class action entitled Yannes v.
−Removed: of shares of SCWorx’s common stock, valued at $600,000 at the time of issuance to authorized
−Removed: claimants in the Yannes settlement, provided that the Class Distribution Order is entered within 365 days from the entry of the Final
−Removed: Judgment in the SEC action.
−Removed: In the event that the Company does not transfer shares of its common stock, valued at $600,000 at the time
−Removed: of issuance to authorized claimants in the class action settlement within 365 days from the entry of a Final Judgment, the Company will
−Removed: be required to remit to the SEC the full amount of disgorgement within 395 days from entry of a Final Judgment.
−Removed: On May 31, 2022, the Commission
−Removed: filed a complaint against Marc Schessel and the Company in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging violations
−Removed: of Sections 17(a)(1), 17(a)(2), and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), Section 10(b) of the Securities
−Removed: Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and Rules 10b-5(a), 10b-5(b), and 10b-5(c) thereunder relating to the April 13,
−Removed: 2020 press release and related disclosures we made in relation to the transaction involving COVID-19 test kits.
−Removed: At the same time, on May
−Removed: 31, 2022, the Commission filed a motion for approval of the Consent Judgment which contained the aforementioned fine, disgorgement requirement
−Removed: as well as an agreement by the Company to an injunction permanently restraining and enjoining the Company from violating Section 10(b)
−Removed: of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C.
−Removed: § 78j(b)] and Rules 10b-5(a), (b), and (c) thereunder
−Removed: [17 C.F.R § 240.10b ..
−Removed: 5(a), (b), (c)];
−Removed: and Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act’’) [15
−Removed: On June 2, 2022, the Court granted the motion, approved the settlement and entered a final judgment.
−Removed: thus far paid 3 of 4 installments on the monetary penalty of $125,000.
−Removed: In connection with these actions and investigations,
−Removed: the Company is obligated to indemnify its officers and directors for costs incurred in defending against these claims and investigations.
−Removed: Because the Company currently does not have the resources to pay for these costs, its directors and officers liability insurance carrier
−Removed: has agreed to indemnify these persons.
−Removed: Upon consummation of the settlement of the Consolidated Class Action, the Company believes it will
−Removed: have satisfied its accrued retention obligations with respect to the insurance coverage.
+Added: On August 19, 2022, Hadrian
+Added: Equities Partners, LLC and the Phillip W.
+Added: 2007 Irrevocable Trust filed a complaint in the United States District Court for
+Added: the Southern District of New York alleging that SCWorx was dilatory and did not comply with its alleged contractual duties to remove the
+Added: restrictions from Plaintiffs’ converted AMMA stock to SCWorx stock until August 10 and August 11, 2020.
+Added: Plaintiffs allege that as
+Added: a result, they were unable to sell their SCWorx stock when SCWorx was trading at its highest price on April 13, 2020.
+Added: The Complaint sought
+Added: $500,000 in damages.
+Added: Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint on November 28, 2022.
+Added: On February 6, 2023, SCWorx filed its answer to the Amended
+Added: Complaint interposing numerous defenses.
+Added: Plaintiff have since entered into a settlement agreement dated December 1, 2023 (effective as
+Added: of October 23, 2023) (as amended April 29, 2024), under which the Company agreed to pay Plaintiffs $20,000 and issue them 37,500 shares
+Added: of common stock, all in full settlement of the claims made in the lawsuit.
+Added: The cash payment was made in July 2024, and the shares were
+Added: issued in May 2024.
+Added: Bernstein, Esq.
+Added: As previously disclosed in
+Added: the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2023, on June 7, 2023, Carole R.
+Added: Bernstein, Esq.
+Added: filed a complaint in the
+Added: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company.
+Added: The complaint alleged that the Company breached
+Added: its engagement agreement with Ms.
+Added: Bernstein by failing to pay legal fees when due.
+Added: Bernstein sought to recover $69,164 fees
+Added: owing for services, plus interest, costs, including her attorney’s fees.
+Added: The Company and the Plaintiff have since entered into
+Added: a settlement agreement dated July 12, 2024, under which the Company agreed to pay Plaintiffs $80,000 in two equal installments of $40,000,
+Added: the first of which was paid August 9, 2024, and the second of which is payable on or about October 9, 2024.
Mine Safety Disclosures
1 unchanged sentence
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.