1 unchanged sentence
time to time, we are involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business.
−Removed: June 5, 2020, we filed suit against Ortho-Tain, Inc.
−Removed: in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado seeking
−Removed: relief from certain false, threatening, and defamatory statements to our business affiliate, Benco Dental.
−Removed: We believe such statements
−Removed: have interfered with our business relationship and contract, causing us harm to our reputation, loss of goodwill, and unspecified
−Removed: monetary damages.
−Removed: On February 12, 2021, we amended our complaint to add claims for false advertising and unfair business practices,
−Removed: as well as additional variants of the original claims to address Ortho-Tain’s false advertising campaign against us in the
−Removed: fall of 2020.
−Removed: We are in the process of pursuing discovery for the expanded claims.
−Removed: Our complaint seeks permanent injunctive
−Removed: relief to prevent the defendant’s continued illegal defamatory statements and interference with our business relationships.
−Removed: We further seek declaratory relief to refute the defendant’s false allegations, as well as monetary damages to compensate
−Removed: us for harm caused by the defendant.
−Removed: Prior to filing suit, we worked collaboratively with legal counsel at Benco Dental to address
−Removed: and reasonably resolve this matter.
+Added: April 13, 2021, the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions (“WSDFI”) sent a letter and subpoena requesting
+Added: that we produce certain documents and records.
+Added: WSDFI is investigating certain sales of our common stock by a previous employee and independent
+Added: contractor in Washington prior to our initial public offering.
+Added: This subject matter in general (including activities of such previous
+Added: employee and independent contractor) had been among the issues previously investigated by a joint committee of our board of directors
+Added: and internal and external legal counsel that commenced in February 2020 and, pursuant to the findings and recommendations of the joint
+Added: committee, led to the company implementing in April 2020 certain enhanced corporate governance policies (in the form of a formal written
+Added: policy on private stock sales requiring prior approval of our internal or external legal counsel and changes to certain organizational
+Added: We have cooperated with WSDFI regarding this investigation, but during and subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2021,
+Added: we have not been made aware of any developments with the investigation.
+Added: June 5, 2020, we filed suit against Ortho-Tain, Inc.(“Ortho-Tain”) in the United States District Court for the District of
+Added: Colorado seeking relief from certain false, threatening, and defamatory statements to our business affiliate, Benco Dental (“Benco”).
+Added: We believe such statements have interfered with our business relationship and contract, causing harm to our reputation, loss of goodwill,
+Added: and unspecified monetary damages.
+Added: On February 12, 2021, we amended our complaint to add claims for false advertising and unfair business
+Added: practices, as well as additional variants of the original claims to address Ortho-Tain’s alleged false advertising campaign against
+Added: us in the fall of 2020.
+Added: Our amended complaint seeks permanent injunctive relief to prevent what we believe are defamatory statements
+Added: and interference with our business relationships by Ortho-Tain.
+Added: We further seek declaratory relief to refute the defendant’s false
+Added: allegations, as well as monetary damages.
+Added: Prior to filing suit, we worked collaboratively with legal counsel at Benco to address and
+Added: resolve this matter.
Such efforts were unsuccessful.
On February 26, 2021, Ortho-Tain, Inc.
−Removed: filed a Motion to Dismiss
−Removed: the amended complaint we filed against it in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.
−Removed: While we are still
−Removed: evaluating the Motion to Dismiss, we believe such arguments made by Ortho-Tain, Inc.
−Removed: in the Motion to Dismiss lack merit.
+Added: filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint.
+Added: We opposed the motion.
+Added: On September 3, 2021, the District Court denied the motion to dismiss on all grounds and lifted the stay of discovery.
+Added: On September 7, 2021, Ortho-Tain filed a notice of appeal of the District Court’s order to the United States Court of Appeals for
+Added: the Tenth Circuit.
+Added: On September 21, 2021, we filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
+Added: On October 12, 2021, the
+Added: Court of Appeals referred the motion to dismiss the appeal to the merits panel for decision along with the merits.
+Added: The appeal is now
+Added: fully briefed and awaiting decision form the Tenth Circuit.
July 22, 2020 Ortho-Tain, Inc.
−Removed: filed a Complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois naming
−Removed: Vivos, along with our Chief Executive Officer, R.
+Added: filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois naming our
+Added: company, along with our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, R.
Kirk Huntsman, Benco Dental Supply Co., Dr.
Brian Kraft, Dr.
−Removed: Ben Miraglia, and
−Removed: The Ortho-Tain complaint addresses the same events as the suit we filed against Ortho-Tain, Inc.
−Removed: as described above.
−Removed: The Ortho-Tain complaint alleges violation of the Lanham Act and an alleged civil conspiracy among the defendants
−Removed: to violate the Lanham Act by an alleged false designation of origin related to a presentation given by Dr.
−Removed: Brian Kraft at an event
−Removed: sponsored by us and Benco Dental.
−Removed: Ortho-Tain also alleges that the actions of the defendants, including our company, diverted
−Removed: sales from Ortho-Tain, deprived Ortho-Tain of advertising value and resulted in a loss of goodwill to Ortho-Tain.
−Removed: However, Ortho-Tain
−Removed: does not attempt to measure any such damages or clearly articulate its losses, short of the broad allegations contained in its
+Added: Ben Miraglia,
+Added: Mark Musso (the “Illinois Ortho-Tain Case”).
+Added: The complaint in the Illinois Ortho-Tain Case addresses the same events
+Added: as the suit we filed against Ortho-Tain, Inc.
+Added: in June 2020 as described above.
+Added: The complaint in the Illinois Ortho-Tain Case alleges
+Added: violation of the Lanham Act and an alleged civil conspiracy among the defendants to violate the Lanham Act by an alleged false designation
+Added: of origin related to a presentation given by Dr.
+Added: Brian Kraft at an event sponsored by us and Benco Dental.
+Added: Ortho-Tain also alleges that
+Added: the actions of the defendants, including our company, diverted sales from Ortho-Tain, deprived Ortho-Tain of advertising value and resulted
+Added: in a loss of goodwill to Ortho-Tain.
Ortho-Tain also alleges two separate breach of contract actions against Dr.
−Removed: Brian Kraft and our Chief Executive Officer,
−Removed: Kirk Huntsman.
−Removed: Ortho-Tain’s allegation of breach of contract against Mr.
−Removed: Huntsman, relates to a Non-Disclosure Agreement
−Removed: entered into in October 2013 with Mr.
−Removed: Huntsman’s prior entity, Xenith Practices, LLC, which Non-Disclosure Agreement expired
−Removed: pursuant to its terms in October 2016.
−Removed: We continue to evaluate the allegations, although we believe they lack merit and Ortho-Tain
−Removed: will be unable to establish actionable damages.
−Removed: On September 9, 2020, we moved to dismiss the claims against us.
−Removed: On October 23,
−Removed: 2020, we filed a motion requesting, in the alternative, that if the case is not dismissed, it be transferred to the Colorado action
−Removed: described above or stayed.
−Removed: Both motions are pending before the Court.
−Removed: If either motion is unsuccessful, we will defend the claims
−Removed: alleged by Ortho-Tain vigorously, and we do not believe that Ortho-Tain’s claims would materially impact our operations,
−Removed: nor would they amount to any material damages should Otho-Tain prevail.
−Removed: are no other legal proceedings currently pending against us, or known to be contemplated by any governmental agency, which we
−Removed: believe would have a material effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.
+Added: Brian Kraft and Mr.
+Added: Ortho-Tain’s allegation of breach of contract against Mr.
+Added: Huntsman, relates to a Non-Disclosure Agreement entered into
+Added: in October 2013 with Mr.
+Added: Huntsman’s prior entity, Xenith Practices, LLC, which Non-Disclosure Agreement expired pursuant to its
+Added: terms in October 2016.
+Added: We continue to evaluate the allegations, although we believe they lack merit and think Ortho-Tain will be unable
+Added: to establish actionable damages.
+Added: On September 9, 2020, we moved to dismiss the claims against us in the Illinois Ortho-Tain Case.
+Added: October 23, 2020, we filed a motion requesting, in the alternative, that if the case is not dismissed, it be transferred to the Colorado
+Added: action described above or stayed.
+Added: On May 14, 2021, the Court granted our motion to stay the Illinois Ortho-Tain Case, pending resolution
+Added: of the Colorado action described above.
+Added: On September 3, 2021 and again on December 2, 2021., the Court extended the stay.
+Added: The case remains
+Added: May 17, 2021, plaintiff Steven Rospond (“Rospond”) filed a lawsuit against Proceed Finance asserting claims for breach of
+Added: contract and violation of the Kansas Consumer Protection Act against Defendants Proceed Finance and Security First Bank regarding a $50,000
+Added: loan Rospond took to pay for services provided by our company.
+Added: Rospond sent us a subpoena seeking various
+Added: documents relating to the services provided by us to which it responded and provided documents on December 21, 2021.
+Added: In an Order dated
+Added: October 26, 2021, the court granted Rospond an extension of up to seven days after we delivered documents to Rospond within which to
+Added: amend his lawsuit, including to assert claims against us.
+Added: To date, we have no knowledge of Rospond asserting any claims against us.
+Added: to the court’s docket, this lawsuit is still pending and has not been dismissed.
+Added: are no other legal proceedings currently pending against us, or known to be contemplated by any governmental agency, which we believe
+Added: would have a material effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.
Mine Safety Disclosures.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.