What changed in this filing

/stocks — the workspaceLOADING

Item 1. Business

2021-02-26 compared with 2020-03-13 · 790 added, 1526 removed, 166 unchanged (93% of the section changed)

The United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP

(“USL”) is a Delaware limited partnership organized on June 27, 2007.

USL maintains its main business office at 1850

The United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (“USL”) is a Delaware limited partnership organized on June 27, 2007.

USL maintains its main business office at 1850 Mt.

Diablo Boulevard, Suite 640, Walnut Creek, California 94596.

USL is a commodity pool that issues limited partnership interests

(“shares”) traded on the NYSE Arca, Inc.

USL is a commodity pool that issues limited partnership interests (“shares”) traded on the NYSE Arca, Inc.

(the “NYSE Arca”).

It operates pursuant to the terms of the Third

Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership dated as of December 15, 2017 (as amended from time to time, the “LP

Agreement”), which grants full management control to its general partner, United States Commodity Funds LLC (“USCF”).

The investment objective of USL is for

the daily changes in percentage terms of its shares’ per share net asset value (“NAV”) to reflect the daily changes

in percentage terms of the spot price of light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma, as measured by the daily changes

in the average of the prices of 12 futures contracts for light, sweet crude oil traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (the

“NYMEX”), consisting of the near month contract to expire and the contracts for the following 11 months, for a total

of 12 consecutive months’ contracts, except when the near month contract is within two weeks of expiration, in which case

it will be measured by the futures contract that is the next month contract to expire and the contracts for the following 11 consecutive

months (the “Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts”), plus interest earned on USL’s collateral holdings, less USL’s

When calculating the daily movement of the average price of the 12 contracts, each contract month will be equally weighted.

It is not the intent of USL to be operated in a fashion such that the per share NAV will equal, in dollar terms, the spot price

of light, sweet crude oil or any particular futures contract based on light, sweet crude oil, nor is USL’s investment objective

for the percentage change in its per share NAV to reflect the percentage change of the price of any particular futures contract

as measured over a time period greater than one day .

USCF believes that it is not practical

to manage the portfolio to achieve such an investment goal when investing in Oil Futures Contracts (as defined below) and Other

Oil-Related Investments (as defined below).

USL's shares began trading on December 6, 2007.

USCF is the general partner of

USL and is responsible for the management of USL.

USCF is a single member limited liability

company that was formed in the state of Delaware on May 10, 2005.

It operates pursuant to the terms of the Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership dated as of December 15, 2017 (as amended from time to time, the “LP Agreement”), which grants full management control to its general partner, United States Commodity Funds LLC (“USCF”).

The investment objective of USL is for the daily changes in percentage terms of its per share net asset value (“NAV”) to reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of the spot price of light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma, as measured by the daily changes in the average of the prices of specified short-term futures contracts on light, sweet crude oil called the "Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts,"

plus interest earned on USL's collateral holdings, less USL's expenses.

The Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts are the futures contracts on light, sweet crude oil as traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (the “NYMEX”) that is the near month contract to expire and the contracts for the following 11 months, for a total of 12 consecutive months’ contracts, except when the near month contract is within two weeks of expiration, in which case it will be the futures contract that is the next month contract to expire and the contracts for the following 11 consecutive months.

When calculating the daily movement of the average price of the 12 contracts, each contract month is equally weighted.

USL seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing so that the average daily percentage change in USL's NAV for any period of 30 successive valuation days will be within plus/minus ten percent (10%) of the average daily percentage change in the price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts over the same period.

USL seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in futures contracts for light, sweet crude oil, other types of crude oil, diesel-heating oil, gasoline, natural gas, and other petroleum-based fuels that are traded on the NYMEX, ICE Futures Europe and ICE Futures U.S.

(together, "ICE Futures") or other U.S.

and foreign exchanges (collectively, "Oil Futures Contracts") and to a lesser extent, in order to comply with regulatory requirements or in view of market conditions, other oil-related investments such as cash-settled options on Oil Futures Contracts, forward contracts for oil, cleared swap contracts and non-exchange traded ("over-the-counter"

or "OTC") transactions that are based on the price of oil, other petroleum-based fuels, Oil Futures Contracts and indices based on the foregoing (collectively, "Other Oil-Related Investments").

Market conditions that USCF currently anticipates could cause USL to invest in Other Oil-Related Investments include those allowing USL to obtain greater liquidity or to execute transactions with more favorable pricing.

(For convenience and unless otherwise specified, Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments collectively are referred to as "Oil Interests"

in this annual report on Form 10-K).

In addition, USCF believes that market arbitrage opportunities will cause daily changes in USL's share price on the NYSE Arca on a percentage basis to closely track daily changes in USL's per share NAV on a percentage basis.

USCF further believes that the daily changes in the average prices of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts have historically closely tracked the daily changes in prices of light, sweet crude oil.

USCF believes that the net effect of these relationships will be that the daily changes in the price of USL's shares on the NYSE Arca on a percentage basis will closely track the daily changes in the spot price of a barrel of light, sweet crude oil on a percentage basis, less USL's expenses.

Investors should be aware that USL's investment objective is not for its NAV or market price of shares to equal, in dollar terms, the spot price of light, sweet crude oil or any particular futures contract based on light, sweet crude oil, nor is USL’s investment objective for the percentage change in its NAV to reflect the percentage change of the price of any particular futures contract as measured over a time period greater than one day .

This is because natural market forces called contango and backwardation have impacted the total return on an investment in USL's shares during the past year relative to a hypothetical direct investment in crude oil and, in the future, it is likely that the relationship between the market price of USL's shares and changes in the spot prices of light, sweet crude oil will continue to be so impacted by contango and backwardation.

(It is important to note that the disclosure above ignores the potential costs associated with physically owning and storing crude oil, which could be substantial).

USCF is a single member limited liability company that was formed in the state of Delaware on May 10, 2005.

USCF maintains its main business office at 1850 Mt.

Diablo Boulevard,

Suite 640, Walnut Creek, California 94596.

USCF is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wainwright Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation

(“Wainwright”), which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Concierge Technologies, Inc.

(publicly traded under the ticker

CNCG) (“Concierge”).

Gerber (discussed below), along with certain family members and certain other

shareholders, owns the majority of the shares in Concierge.

Wainwright is a holding company that currently holds both USCF, as

well as USCF Advisers LLC, an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended.

USCF Advisers

LLC serves as the investment adviser for the USCF SummerHaven SHPEN Index Fund (“BUYN”), the USCF SummerHaven SHPEI

Index Fund (“BUY”) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total Return SM (“SDCI”), each

a series of the USCF ETF Trust.

USCF Advisers LLC also served as the investment adviser to the USCF Commodity Strategy Fund, a

series of the USCF Mutual Funds Trust, which liquidated all of its assets and distributed cash pro rata to all remaining shareholders

in March 2019.

USCF ETF Trust and USCF Mutual Funds Trust are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the

The Board of Trustees for USCF ETF Trust and USCF Mutual Funds Trust consist of different independent

trustees than those independent directors who serve on the Board of Directors of USCF.

USCF is a member of the National Futures

Association (the “NFA”) and registered as a commodity pool operator (“CPO”) with the Commodity Futures

Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) on December 1, 2005 and as a swaps firm on August 8, 2013.

USCF serves as general partner of the United

States Oil Fund, LP (“USO”), the United States Natural Gas Fund, LP (“UNG”), the United States Gasoline

Fund, LP (“UGA”), the United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund, LP (“UNL”) and the United States Brent Oil

Fund, LP (“BNO”).

USCF previously served as the general partner for the United States Short Oil Fund, LP (“DNO”)

and the United States Diesel-Heating Oil Fund, LP (“UHN”), both of which were liquidated in 2018.

USCF is also the sponsor of the United

States Commodity Index Fund (“USCI”), the United States Copper Index Fund (“CPER”), and the USCF Crescent

Crypto Index Fund (“XBET”), each a series of the United States Commodity Index Funds Trust (“USCIFT”).

XBET is currently in registration and has not commenced operations.

USCF previously served as the sponsor for the United

States Agriculture Index Fund (“USAG”), which was liquidated in 2018.

In addition, USCF is the sponsor of the

USCF Funds Trust, a Delaware statutory trust, and each of its series, the United States 3x Oil Fund (“USOU”) and the

United States 3x Short Oil Fund (“USOD”), which listed their shares on the NYSE Arca on July 20, 2017 under the ticker

symbols “USOU” and “USOD”, respectively.

Each of USOU and USOD liquidated all of its assets and distributed

cash pro rata to all remaining shareholders in December 2019.

USO, UNG, UGA, UNL, USL, BNO, USCI and

CPER are referred to collectively herein as the “Related Public Funds.”

The Related Public Funds are subject to

reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

For more information

about each of the Related Public Funds, investors in USL may call 1-800-920-0259 or visit www.uscfinvestments.com or the website

of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) at www.sec.gov.

USCF is required to evaluate the credit

risk of USL to the futures commission merchant (“FCM”), oversee the purchase and sale of USL’s shares by certain

authorized purchasers (“Authorized Participants”), review daily positions and margin requirements of USL and manage

USL’s investments.

Diablo Boulevard, Suite 640, Walnut Creek, California 94596.

USCF is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wainwright Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Wainwright”), which is an intermediate holding company that owns USCF and another advisor of exchange traded funds.

Wainwright is a wholly owned subsidiary of Concierge Technologies, Inc.

(publicly traded under the ticker CNCG) (“Concierge”), a publicly traded holding company that owns various financial and non-financial businesses.

Nicholas Gerber (discussed below), along with certain family members and certain other shareholders, owns the majority of the shares in Concierge.

Wainwright is a holding company that currently holds both USCF, as well as USCF Advisers LLC, an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (“USCF Advisers”).

USCF Advisers serves as the investment adviser for the USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (“SDCI”), a series of the USCF ETF Trust.

USCF Advisers was also the investment adviser for the USCF Commodity Strategy Fund (the "Mutual Fund"), a series of the USCF Mutual Funds Trust, until March 2019, when the Mutual Fund liquidated all of its assets and distributed cash pro rata to all remaining shareholders.

It was also the investment adviser for two series of the USCF ETF Trust that liquidated all of their assets and distributed cash pro rata to all remaining shareholders:

the USCF SummerHaven SHPEI Index Fund ("BUY"), until October 2020, and the USCF SummerHaven SHPEN Index Fund ("BUYN"), until May 2020.

USCF ETF Trust and USCF Mutual Funds Trust are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).

The Board of Trustees for the USCF ETF Trust and USCF Mutual Funds Trust consist of different independent trustees than those independent directors who serve on the Board of Directors of USCF.

USCF is a member of the National Futures Association (the “NFA”) and registered as a commodity pool operator (“CPO”) with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) on December 1, 2005 and as a swaps firm on August 8, 2013.

USCF serves as the general partner of USL.

USCF also serves as the general partner of the United States Oil Fund, LP (“USO”), the United States Natural Gas Fund, LP (“UNG”), and the United States Gasoline Fund, LP (“UGA”) which listed their limited partnership shares on the American Stock Exchange (the "AMEX") under the ticker symbols “USO” on April 10, 2006, under the ticker symbols “USO” on April 10, 2006, “UNG” on April 18, 2007, and “UGA” on February 26, 2008, respectively.

As a result of the acquisition of the AMEX by NYSE Euronext, each of USO’s, UNG’s and UGA’s shares commenced trading on the NYSE Arca on November 25, 2008.

USCF is also the general partner of the United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund, LP (“UNL”) and the United States Brent Oil Fund, LP (“BNO”), which listed their limited partnership shares on the NYSE Arca under the ticker symbols “UNL” on November 18, 2009 and “BNO” on June 2, 2010, respectively.

USCF is also the sponsor of the United States Commodity Index Fund (“USCI”), the United States Copper Index Fund (“CPER”), and the USCF Crescent Crypto Index Fund (“XBET”), each a series of the United States Commodity Index Funds Trust (“USCIFT”).

USCI and CPER listed their shares on the NYSE Arca under the ticker symbols “USCI” on August 10, 2010 and “CPER” on November 15, 2011, respectively.

A registration statement that had been previously filed for XBET was withdrawn on June 25, 2020.

USO, UNG, UGA, UNL, USL, BNO, USCI and CPER are referred to collectively herein as the “Related Public Funds.”

The Related Public Funds are subject to reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

For more information about each of the Related Public Funds, investors in USL may call 1-800-920-0259 or visit www.uscfinvestments.com or the website of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) at www.sec.gov.

USCF is required to evaluate the credit risk of USL to the futures commission merchants (“FCMs”), oversee the purchase and sale of USL’s shares by certain authorized purchasers (“Authorized Participants”), review daily positions and margin requirements of USL and manage USL’s investments.

USCF also pays the fees of ALPS Distributors, Inc.

(“ALPS Distributors”), which serves as

the marketing agent for USL (the “Marketing Agent”), and Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.

which serves as the administrator (the “Administrator”) and the custodian (the “Custodian”) for USL.

Limited partners have no right to elect

USCF as the general partner on an annual or any other continuing basis.

If USCF voluntarily withdraws as general partner, however,

the holders of a majority of USL’s outstanding shares (excluding for purposes of such determination shares owned, if any,

by the withdrawing USCF and its affiliates) may elect its successor.

USCF may not be removed as general partner except upon approval

by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 and 2/3 percent of USL’s outstanding shares (excluding shares owned,

if any, by USCF and its affiliates), subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the LP Agreement.

USL has no executive officers or employees.

Pursuant to the terms of the LP Agreement, USL’s affairs are managed by USCF.

The business and affairs of USCF are managed

by a board of directors (the “Board”), which is comprised of four management directors (the “Management Directors”),

each of whom are also executive officers or employees of USCF, and three independent directors who meet the independent director

requirements established by the NYSE Arca Equities Rules and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The Management Directors have the

authority to manage USCF pursuant to the terms of the Sixth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of USCF, dated

as of May 15, 2015 (as amended from time to time, the “LLC Agreement”).

Through its Management Directors, USCF manages

the day-to-day operations of USL.

The Board has an audit committee which is made up of the three independent directors (Gordon

(“ALPS Distributors”), which serves as the marketing agent for USL (the “Marketing Agent”), and The Bank of New York Mellon ("BNY Mellon"), which serves as the administrator (the “Administrator”) and the custodian (the “Custodian”), and provides accounting and transfer agent services for, USL since April 1, 2020.

Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.

("BBH&Co.") served as the administrator and custodian for USL prior to BNY Mellon.

Certain fund accounting and fund

administration services rendered by BBH&Co.

to USL and the Related Public Funds terminated on May 31, 2020 to allow for the transition to BNY Mellon.

The limited partners take no part in the management or control of, and have a minimal voice in USL's operations or business.

Limited partners have no right to elect USCF as the general partner on an annual or any other continuing basis.

If USCF voluntarily withdraws as general partner, however, the holders of a majority of USL’s outstanding shares (excluding for purposes of such determination shares owned, if any, by the withdrawing USCF and its affiliates) may elect its successor.

USCF may not be removed as general partner except upon approval by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 and 2/3 percent of USL’s outstanding shares (excluding shares owned, if any, by USCF and its affiliates), subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the LP Agreement.

The business and affairs of USCF are managed by a board of directors (the “Board”), which is comprised of four management directors (the “Management Directors”), each of whom are also executive officers or employees of USCF, and three independent directors who meet the independent director requirements established by the NYSE Arca Equities Rules and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The Management Directors have the authority to manage USCF pursuant to the terms of the Sixth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of USCF, dated as of May 15, 2015 (as amended from time to time, the “LLC Agreement”).

Through its Management Directors, USCF manages the day-to-day operations of USL.

The Board has an audit committee which is made up of the three independent directors (Gordon L.

Ellis, Malcolm R.

2 unchanged sentences

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance – Audit Committee ” in this annual report on Form 10-K.

USL has no executive officers or employees.

Pursuant to the terms of the LP Agreement, USL's affairs are managed by USCF.

How Does USL Operate?

An investment in the shares provides a

means for diversifying an investor’s portfolio or hedging exposure to changes in oil prices.

An investment in the shares

allows both retail and institutional investors to easily gain this exposure to the crude oil market in a transparent, cost-effective

The net assets of USL consist primarily

of investments in futures contracts for light, sweet crude oil, other types of crude oil, diesel-heating oil, gasoline, natural

gas, and other petroleum-based fuels that are traded on the NYMEX, ICE Futures or other U.S.

and foreign exchanges (collectively,

“Oil Futures Contracts”) and, to a lesser extent, in order to comply with regulatory requirements or in view of market

conditions, other oil-related investments such as cash-settled options on Oil Futures Contracts, forward contracts for oil, cleared

swap contracts and non-exchange traded over-the-counter (“OTC”) transactions that are based on the price of oil, other

petroleum-based fuels, Oil Futures Contracts and indices based on the foregoing (collectively, “Other Oil-Related Investments”).

Market conditions that USCF currently anticipates could cause USL to invest in Other Oil-Related Investments include those allowing

USL to obtain greater liquidity or to execute transactions with more favorable pricing.

For convenience and unless otherwise specified,

Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments collectively are referred to as “Oil Interests” in this annual

report on Form 10-K.

USL invests substantially the entire amount of its assets in Oil Futures Contracts while supporting such investments

by holding the amounts of its margin, collateral and other requirements relating to these obligations in short-term obligations

of the United States of two years or less (“Treasuries”), cash and cash equivalents.

The daily holdings of USL are

available on USL’s website at www.uscfinvestments.com.

The investment objective of USL is for

the daily changes in percentage terms of its shares’ per share NAV to reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of the

spot price of light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma, as measured by the daily changes in the average of the prices

of 12 futures contracts for light, sweet crude oil traded on the NYMEX, consisting of the near month contract to expire and the

contracts for the following 11 months, for a total of 12 consecutive months’ contracts, except when the near month contract

is within two weeks of expiration, in which case it will be measured by the futures contracts that are the next month contract

to expire (the “Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts”), plus interest earned on USL’s collateral holdings, less USL’s

When calculating the daily movement of the average price of the 12 contracts, each contract month is equally weighted.

USL’s investment objective is not for its NAV or market price of shares to equal, in dollar terms, the spot price

of light, sweet crude oil or any particular futures contract based on light, sweet crude oil, nor is USL’s investment

objective for the percentage change in its NAV to reflect the percentage change of the price of any particular futures contract

as measured over a time period greater than one day .

USL may invest in interests other than the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts

to comply with accountability levels and position limits.

For a detailed discussion of accountability levels and position limits,

An investment in the shares provides a means for diversifying an investor’s portfolio or hedging exposure to changes in oil prices.

An investment in the shares allows both retail and institutional investors to easily gain this exposure to the crude oil market in a transparent, cost-effective manner.

The net assets of USL consist primarily of investments in futures contracts for light, sweet crude oil, other types of crude oil, diesel-heating oil, gasoline, natural gas, and other petroleum-based fuels that are traded on the NYMEX, ICE Futures or other U.S.

and foreign exchanges (collectively, “Oil Futures Contracts”) and, to a lesser extent, in order to comply with regulatory requirements or in view of market conditions, other oil-related investments such as cash-settled options on Oil Futures Contracts, forward contracts for oil, cleared swap contracts and non-exchange traded over-the-counter (“OTC”) transactions that are based on the price of oil, other petroleum-based fuels, Oil Futures Contracts and indices based on the foregoing (collectively, “Other Oil-Related Investments”).

For convenience and unless otherwise specified, Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments collectively are referred to as “Oil Interests” in this annual report on Form 10-K.

USL invests substantially the entire amount of its assets in Oil Futures Contracts while supporting such investments by holding the amounts of its margin, collateral and other requirements relating to these obligations in short-term obligations of the United States of two years or less (“Treasuries”), cash and cash equivalents.

The daily holdings of USL are available on USL’s website at www.uscfinvestments.com.

USL may invest in interests other than the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts to comply with accountability levels and position limits.

For a detailed discussion of accountability levels and position limits, see “Item 1.

Business – What are Oil Futures Contracts?” below in this annual report on Form 10-K.

USCF employs a “neutral” investment

strategy in order to track changes in the average prices of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts regardless of whether these prices

go up or go down.

USL’s “neutral” investment strategy is designed to permit investors generally to purchase and

sell USL’s shares for the purpose of investing indirectly in crude oil in a cost-effective manner, and/or to permit participants

in the oil or other industries to hedge the risk of losses in their crude oil-related transactions.

Accordingly, depending on the

investment objective of an individual investor, the risks generally associated with investing in crude oil and/or the risks involved

in hedging may exist.

In addition, an investment in USL involves the risk that the daily changes in the price of USL’s shares,

in percentage terms, will not accurately track the daily changes in the average prices of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts,

in percentage terms, and that daily changes in the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts, in percentage terms, will not closely correlate

with daily changes in the spot price of light, sweet crude oil, in percentage terms.

The Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts are

changed from the near month contract to expire and the 11 following months to the next month contract to expire and the 11 following

months during one day each month.

On that day, USCF “rolls” USL’s positions by closing, or selling, USL’s

Oil Interests and reinvests the proceeds from closing these positions in new Oil Interests.

The anticipated dates on which the Benchmark

Oil Futures Contracts are changed and USL’s Oil Interests are “rolled” will be posted on USL’s website

at www.uscfinvestments.com, and are subject to change without notice.

USL’s total portfolio composition

is disclosed on its website each business day that the NYSE Arca is open for trading.

The website disclosure of portfolio holdings

is made daily and includes, as applicable, the name and value of each Oil Interest, the specific types of Other Oil-Related Investments

and characteristics of such Other Oil-Related Investments, the name and value of each Treasury security and cash equivalent, and

the amount of cash held in USL’s portfolio.

USCF employs a “neutral” investment strategy in order to track changes in the average prices of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts regardless of whether these prices go up or go down.

USL’s “neutral” investment strategy is designed to permit investors generally to purchase and sell USL’s shares for the purpose of investing indirectly in crude oil in a cost-effective manner, and/or to permit participants in the oil or other industries to hedge the risk of losses in their crude oil-related

transactions.

Accordingly, depending on the investment objective of an individual investor, the risks generally associated with investing in crude oil and/or the risks involved in hedging may exist.

In addition, an investment in USL involves the risk that the daily changes in the price of USL’s shares, in percentage terms, will not accurately track the daily changes in the average prices of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts, in percentage terms, and that daily changes in the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts, in percentage terms, will not closely correlate with daily changes in the spot price of light, sweet crude oil, in percentage terms.

USCF does not anticipate letting USL's Oil Futures Contracts expire and taking delivery of the underlying commodity.

Instead, USCF closes existing positions, e.g., when it changes the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts or Other Oil-Related Investments or it otherwise determines it would be appropriate to do so and reinvests the proceeds in new Oil Futures Contracts or Other Oil-Related Investments.

Positions may also be closed out to meet orders for Redemption Baskets and in such case proceeds for such baskets will not be reinvested.

The Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts are changed from the near month contract to expire and the 11 following months to the next month contract to expire and the 11 following months during one day each month.

On that day, USCF “rolls” USL's positions by closing, or selling, USL's Oil Interests and reinvests the proceeds from closing these positions in new Oil Interests.

The anticipated dates on which the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts are changed and USL's Oil Interests are “rolled” will be posted on USL's website at www.uscfinvestments.com, and are subject to change without notice.

USL’s total portfolio composition is disclosed on its website each business day that the NYSE Arca is open for trading.

The website disclosure of portfolio holdings is made daily and includes, as applicable, the name and value of each Oil Interest, the specific types of Other Oil-Related Investments and characteristics of such Other Oil-Related Investments, the name and value of each Treasury security and cash equivalent, and the amount of cash held in USL’s portfolio.

USL’s website is publicly accessible at no charge.

USL’s assets used

for margin and collateral are held in segregated accounts pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act (the “CEA”) and CFTC

The shares issued by USL may only be purchased

by Authorized Participants and only in blocks of 50,000 shares called Creation Baskets.

The amount of the purchase payment for

a Creation Basket is equal to the aggregate NAV of the shares in the Creation Basket.

Similarly, only Authorized Participants may

redeem shares and only in blocks of 50,000 shares called Redemption Baskets.

The amount of the redemption proceeds for a Redemption

Basket is equal to the aggregate NAV of shares in the Redemption Basket.

The purchase price for Creation Baskets and the redemption

price for Redemption Baskets are the actual NAV calculated at the end of the business day when a request for a purchase or redemption

is received by USL.

The NYSE Arca publishes an approximate per share NAV intra-day based on the prior day’s per share NAV

and the current price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts, but the price of Creation Baskets and Redemption Baskets is determined

based on the actual per share NAV calculated at the end of the day.

While USL issues shares only in Creation

Baskets, shares are listed on the NYSE Arca and investors may purchase and sell shares at market prices like any listed security.

USL’s assets used for margin and collateral are held in segregated accounts pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act (the “CEA”) and CFTC regulations.

The shares issued by USL may only be purchased by Authorized Participants and only in blocks of 50,000 shares, called “Creation Baskets”.

The amount of the purchase payment for a Creation Basket is equal to the aggregate NAV of the shares in the Creation Basket.

Similarly, only Authorized Participants may redeem shares and only in blocks of 50,000 shares, called “Redemption Baskets”.

The amount of the redemption proceeds for a Redemption Basket is equal to the aggregate NAV of shares in the Redemption Basket.

The purchase price for Creation Baskets and the redemption price for Redemption Baskets are the actual NAV calculated at the end of the business day when a request for a purchase or redemption is received by USL.

The NYSE Arca publishes an approximate per share NAV intra-day based on the prior day’s per share NAV and the current price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts, but the price of Creation Baskets and Redemption Baskets is determined based on the actual per share NAV calculated at the end of the day.

While USL issues shares only in Creation Baskets, shares are listed on the NYSE Arca and investors may purchase and sell shares at market prices like any listed security.

What is USL’s Investment Strategy?

In managing USL’s assets, USCF does

not use a technical trading system that issues buy and sell orders.

USCF instead employs a quantitative methodology whereby each

time a Creation Basket is sold, USCF purchases Oil Interests, such as the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts, that have an aggregate

market value that approximates the amount of Treasuries and/or cash received upon the issuance of the Creation Basket.

By remaining invested as fully as possible

in Oil Futures Contracts or Other Oil-Related Investments, USCF believes that the changes in percentage terms in USL’s per

share NAV will continue to closely track the daily changes in percentage terms in the average of the prices of the Benchmark Oil

Futures Contracts.

USCF believes that certain arbitrage opportunities result in the price of the shares traded on the NYSE Arca

closely tracking the per share NAV of USL.

Additionally, Oil Futures Contracts traded on the NYMEX have closely tracked the spot

price of light, sweet crude oil.

Based on these expected interrelationships, USCF believes that the changes in the price of USL’s

shares traded on the NYSE Arca have closely tracked and will continue to closely track the changes in the spot price of light,

sweet crude oil, on a percentage basis.

In managing USL’s assets, USCF does not use a technical trading system that issues buy and sell orders.

USCF instead employs a quantitative methodology whereby each time a Creation Basket is sold, USCF purchases Oil Interests, such as the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil Futures Contracts, that have an aggregate market value that approximates the amount of Treasuries and/or cash received upon the issuance of the Creation Basket.

USL intends to continue to pursue its investment objective as described above.

By remaining invested as fully as possible in Oil Futures Contracts or Other Oil-Related Investments, USCF believes that the changes in percentage terms of USL’s NAV will continue to closely track the daily changes in percentage terms in the average of the prices of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts.

USCF believes that certain arbitrage opportunities result in the price of the shares traded on the NYSE Arca closely tracking the NAV of USL.

Additionally, Oil Futures Contracts traded on the NYMEX have closely tracked the spot price of light, sweet crude oil.

Based on these expected interrelationships, USCF believes that the changes

in the price of USL’s shares traded on the NYSE Arca have closely tracked and will continue to closely track the changes in the spot price of light, sweet crude oil, on a percentage basis.

For performance data relating to USL’s ability to track its benchmark, see “Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Tracking USL’s Benchmark”

in this annual report on Form 10-K.

USCF endeavors to place USL’s trades

in Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments and otherwise manage USL’s investments so that “A”

will be within plus/minus ten percent (10%) of “B”, where:

A is the average daily change in USL’s per share NAV for any period of 30 successive valuation

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Tracking USL’s Benchmark” in this annual report on Form 10-K.

USL seeks to invest in a combination of Oil Interests such that the daily changes in its NAV, measured in percentage terms, will closely track the daily changes in the price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract, also measured in percentage terms.

As a specific benchmark, USCF endeavors to place USL's trades in Oil Interests and otherwise manage USL’s investments so that “A” will be within plus/minus ten percent (10%) of “B”, where:

● A is the average daily percentage change in USL’s per share NAV for any period of 30 successive valuation days;

i.e., any NYSE Arca trading day as of which USL calculates its per share NAV, and

B is the average daily percentage change in the average of the prices of the Benchmark Oil Futures

Contracts over the same period.

USCF believes that market arbitrage opportunities

will cause the daily changes in USL’s share price on the NYSE Arca to closely track the daily changes in USL’s per

share NAV on a percentage basis.

USCF further believes that the net effect of these two expected relationships and the relationships

described above between USL’s per share NAV and the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts, will be that the daily changes in the

price of USL’s shares on the NYSE Arca on a percentage basis will closely track the daily changes in the spot price of a

barrel of light, sweet crude oil on a percentage basis, plus interest earned on USL’s collateral holdings, less USL’s

● B is the average daily percentage change in the average of the prices of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts over the same period.

USCF believes that market arbitrage opportunities will cause the daily changes in USL’s share price on the NYSE Arca to closely track the daily changes in USL’s per share NAV.

USCF further believes that the daily changes in USL’s NAV in percentage terms will closely track the daily changes in percentage terms in the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract, less USL’s expenses.

For performance data relating to USL’s ability to track its benchmark, see “ Item 7.

Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Tracking USL’s Benchmark” in this

annual report on Form 10-K.

The specific Oil Futures Contracts purchased

depend on various factors, including a judgment by USCF as to the appropriate diversification of USL’s investments in futures

contracts with respect to the month of expiration, and the prevailing price volatility of particular contracts.

In addition, USL

may make use of a mixture of standard sized futures contracts as well as the smaller sized “mini” contracts.

USCF has made significant investments in NYMEX Oil Futures Contracts, for various reasons, including the ability to enter into

the precise amount of exposure to the crude oil market, position limits or other regulatory requirements limiting USL’s holdings,

and market conditions, it may invest in futures contracts traded on other exchanges or invest in Other Oil-Related Investments.

To the extent that USL invests in Other Oil-Related Investments, it would prioritize investments in contracts and instruments that

are economically equivalent to the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts, including cleared swaps that satisfy such criteria, and then,

to a lesser extent, it would invest in other types of cleared swaps and other contracts, instruments and non-cleared swaps, such

as swaps in the OTC market.

If USL is required by law or regulation, or by one of its regulators, including a futures exchange,

to reduce its position in the Futures Contracts to the applicable position limit or to a specified accountability level or if market

conditions dictate it would be more appropriate to invest in Other Oil-Related Investments, a substantial portion of USL’s

assets could be invested in accordance with such priority in Other Oil-Related Investments that are intended to replicate the return

on the Futures Contracts.

As USL’s assets reach higher levels, it is more likely to exceed position limits, accountability

levels or other regulatory limits and, as a result, it is more likely that it will invest in accordance with such priority in Other

Oil-Related Investments at such higher levels.

In addition, market conditions that USCF currently anticipates could cause USL to

invest in Other Oil-Related Investments include those allowing USL to obtain greater liquidity or to execute transactions with

more favorable pricing.

Business – Commodities Regulation” in this annual report on Form

10-K for a discussion of the potential impact of regulation on USL’s ability to invest in OTC transactions and cleared swaps.

USCF may not be able to fully invest USL’s

assets in the Futures Contracts having an aggregate notional amount exactly equal to USL’s NAV.

For example, as standardized

contracts, the Futures Contracts are for a specified amount of a particular commodity, and USL’s NAV and the proceeds from

the sale of a Creation Basket are unlikely to be an exact multiple of the amounts of those contracts.

As a result, in such circumstances,

USL may be better able to achieve the exact amount of exposure to changes in price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts through

the use of Other Oil-Related Investments, such as OTC contracts that have better correlation with changes in price of the Benchmark

Oil Futures Contracts.

USL anticipates that to the extent it invests

in Futures Contracts other than contracts on light, sweet crude oil (such as futures contracts for diesel-heating oil, natural

gas, and other petroleum-based fuels) and Other Oil-Related Investments, it will enter into various non-exchange-traded derivative

contracts to hedge the short-term price movements of such Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments against the current

Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts.

USCF does not anticipate letting USL’s

Oil Futures Contracts expire and taking delivery of the underlying commodity.

Instead, USCF closes existing positions, e.g., when

it changes the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts or Other Oil-Related Investments or it otherwise determines it would be appropriate

to do so and reinvests the proceeds in new Oil Futures Contracts or Other Oil-Related Investments.

Positions may also be closed

out to meet orders for Redemption Baskets and in such case proceeds for such baskets will not be reinvested.

What is the Crude Oil Market and the

Petroleum-Based Fuel Market?

USL may purchase Oil Futures Contracts

traded on the NYMEX that are based on light, sweet crude oil.

It may also purchase contracts on other exchanges, including the

ICE Futures Exchange or other U.S.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Tracking USL’s Benchm ark” in this annual report on Form 10 K.

The specific Oil Futures Contracts purchased depend on various factors, including a judgment by USCF as to the appropriate diversification of USL’s investments in futures contracts with respect to the month of expiration, and the prevailing price volatility of particular contracts.

In addition, USL may make use of a mixture of standard sized futures contracts as well as the smaller sized “mini” contracts.

While USCF has made significant investments in NYMEX Oil Futures Contracts, for various reasons, including the ability to enter into the precise amount of exposure to the crude oil market, position limits or other regulatory requirements limiting USL’s holdings, and market conditions, it may invest in Futures Contracts traded on other exchanges or invest in Other Oil-Related Investments.

To the extent that USL invests in Other Oil-Related Investments, it would prioritize investments in contracts and instruments that are economically equivalent to the Futures Contracts, including cleared swaps that satisfy such criteria, and then, to a lesser extent, it would invest in other types of cleared swaps and other contracts, instruments and non-cleared swaps, such as swaps in the over-the-counter market (or commonly referred to as the “OTC market”).

If USL is required by law or regulation, or by one of its regulators, including a futures exchange, to reduce its position in the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts to the applicable position limit or to a specified accountability level or if market conditions dictate it would be more appropriate to invest in Other Oil-Related Investments, a substantial portion of USL’s assets could be invested in accordance with such priority in Other Oil- Related Investments that are intended to replicate the return on the Futures Contracts.

As USL’s assets reach higher levels, it is more likely to exceed position limits, accountability levels or other regulatory limits and, as a result, it is more likely that it will invest in accordance with such priority in Other Oil-Related Investments at such higher levels.

In addition, market conditions that USCF currently anticipates could cause USL to invest in Other Oil-Related Investments include those allowing USL to obtain greater liquidity or to execute transactions with more favorable pricing.

Business – Commodities Regulation” in this annual report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the potential impact of the regulation on USL’s ability to invest in OTC transactions and cleared swaps.

USCF may not be able to fully invest USL’s assets in Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts having an aggregate notional amount exactly equal to USL’s NAV.

For example, as standardized contracts, the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts are for a specified amount of a particular commodity, and USL’s NAV and the proceeds from the sale of a Creation Basket are unlikely to be an exact multiple of the amounts of those contracts.

As a result, in such circumstances, USL may be better able to achieve the exact amount of exposure to changes in price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts through the use of Other Oil-Related Investments, such as OTC contracts that have better correlation with changes in price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts.

USL anticipates that to the extent it invests in Futures Contracts other than contracts on light, sweet crude oil (such as futures contracts for diesel-heating oil, natural gas, and other petroleum-based fuels) and Other Oil-Related Investments, it will enter into various non-exchange-traded derivative contracts to hedge the short-term price movements of such Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments against the current Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts.

USCF does not anticipate letting USL’s Oil Futures Contracts expire and taking delivery of the underlying commodity.

Instead, USCF will close existing positions, e.g., when it changes the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts or Other Oil-Related Investments or it otherwise determines it would be appropriate to do so and reinvests the proceeds in new Oil Futures Contracts or Other Oil-Related Investments.

Positions may also be closed out to meet orders for Redemption Baskets and in such case proceeds for such baskets will not be reinvested.

What is the Crude Oil Market and the Petroleum-Based Fuel Market?

USL may purchase Oil Futures Contracts traded on the NYMEX that are based on light, sweet crude oil.

It may also purchase contracts on other exchanges, including the ICE Futures Exchange or other U.S.

and foreign exchanges.

The NYMEX contracts provide for delivery of several grades of domestic

and internationally traded foreign crudes, and, among other things, serves the diverse needs of the physical market.

Brent crude oil is the standard for futures contracts and is primarily traded on the ICE Futures Europe.

Brent crude oil is the

price reference for two-thirds of the world’s traded oil.

The ICE Brent Futures is a deliverable contract with an option

to cash settle which trades in units of 1,000 barrels (42,000 U.S.

The ICE Futures also offers a West Texas Intermediate

(“WTI”) crude oil futures contract which trades in units of 1,000 barrels.

The WTI crude oil futures contract is cash

settled against the prevailing market price for U.S.

The NYMEX contracts provide for delivery of several grades of domestic and internationally traded foreign crudes, and, among other things, serves the diverse needs of the physical market.

In Europe, Brent crude oil is the standard for futures contracts and is primarily traded on the ICE Futures Europe.

Brent crude oil is the price reference for two-thirds of the world’s traded oil.

The ICE Brent Futures is a deliverable contract with an option to cash settle which trades in units of 1,000 barrels (42,000 U.S.

The ICE Futures also offers a West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) crude oil futures contract which trades in units of 1,000 barrels.

The WTI crude oil futures contract is cash settled against the prevailing market price for U.S.

light sweet crude oil.

Light, Sweet Crude Oil.

crudes are preferred by refiners because of their low sulfur content and relatively high yields of high-value products such as

gasoline, diesel fuel, diesel-heating oil and jet fuel.

The price of light, sweet crude oil has historically exhibited periods

of significant volatility.

Demand for petroleum products by consumers,

as well as agricultural, manufacturing and transportation industries, determines demand for crude oil by refiners.

Since the precursors

of product demand are linked to economic activity, crude oil demand will tend to reflect economic conditions.

However, other factors

such as weather also influence product and crude oil demand.

Crude oil supply is determined by both

economic and political factors.

Oil prices (along with drilling costs, availability of attractive prospects for drilling, taxes

and technology, among other factors) determine exploration and development spending, which influence output capacity with a lag.

In the short run, production decisions by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) also affect supply

Oil export embargoes and the current conflicts in the Middle East represent other routes through which political developments

move the market.

Light, sweet crudes are preferred by refiners because of their low sulfur content and relatively high yields of high-value products such as gasoline, diesel fuel, diesel-heating oil, and jet fuel.

The price of light, sweet crude oil has historically exhibited periods of significant volatility.

Demand for petroleum products by consumers, as well as agricultural, manufacturing and transportation industries, determines demand for crude oil by refiners.

Since the precursors of product demand are linked to economic activity, crude oil demand will tend to reflect economic conditions.

However, other factors such as weather also influence product and crude oil demand.

Crude oil supply is determined by both economic and political factors.

Oil prices (along with drilling costs, availability of attractive prospects for drilling, taxes and technology, among other factors) determine exploration and development spending, which influence output capacity with a lag.

In the short run, production decisions by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) also affect supply and prices.

Oil export embargoes and the current conflicts in the Middle East represent other routes through which political developments move the market.

It is not possible to predict the aggregate effect of all or any combination of these factors.

Diesel-Heating Oil.

Diesel-heating

oil, also known as No.

2 fuel oil, accounts for 25% of the yield of a barrel of crude oil, the second largest “cut”

from oil after gasoline.

The diesel-heating Oil Futures Contract listed and traded on the NYMEX trades in units of 42,000 gallons

(1,000 barrels) and is based on delivery in the New York harbor, the principal cash market center.

The ICE Futures also offers

a diesel-heating Oil Futures Contract which trades in units of 42,000 U.S.

Diesel-heating oil, also known as No.

2 fuel oil, accounts for 25% of the yield of a barrel of crude oil, the second largest “cut” from oil after gasoline.

The diesel-heating Oil Futures Contract listed and traded on the NYMEX trades in units of 42,000 gallons (1,000 barrels) and is based on delivery in the New York harbor, the principal cash market center.

The ICE Futures also offers a diesel-heating Oil Futures Contract which trades in units of 42,000 U.S.

gallons (1,000 barrels).

The diesel-heating Oil Futures

Contract is cash-settled against the prevailing market price for diesel-heating oil delivered to the New York Harbor.

Gasoline is the largest

single volume refined product sold in the U.S.

The diesel-heating Oil Futures Contract is cash-settled against the prevailing market price for diesel-heating oil delivered to the New York Harbor.

Gasoline is the largest single volume refined product sold in the U.S.

and accounts for almost half of national oil consumption.

The gasoline futures contract

listed and traded on the NYMEX trades in units of 42,000 gallons (1,000 barrels) and is based on delivery at petroleum products

terminals in the New York harbor, the major East Coast trading center for imports and domestic shipments from refineries in the

New York harbor area or from the Gulf Coast refining centers.

The gasoline futures contract listed and traded on the NYMEX trades in units of 42,000 gallons (1,000 barrels) and is based on delivery at petroleum products terminals in the New York harbor, the major East Coast trading center for imports and domestic shipments from refineries in the New York harbor area or from the Gulf Coast refining centers.

The price of gasoline has historically been volatile.

Natural Gas .

Natural gas accounts

for almost a quarter of U.S.

Natural gas accounts for almost a quarter of U.S.

energy consumption.

The natural gas futures contract listed and traded on the NYMEX trades in units

of 10,000 million British thermal units and is based on delivery at the Henry Hub in Louisiana, the nexus of 16 intra-and interstate

natural gas pipeline systems that draw supplies from the region’s prolific gas deposits.

The pipelines serve markets throughout

The natural gas futures contract listed and traded on the NYMEX trades in units of 10,000 million British thermal units and is based on delivery at the Henry

Hub in Louisiana, the nexus of 16 intra-and interstate natural gas pipeline systems that draw supplies from the region’s prolific gas deposits.

The pipelines serve markets throughout the U.S.

East Coast, the Gulf Coast, the Midwest, and up to the Canadian border.

The price of natural gas has historically been

The price of natural gas has historically been volatile.

What are Oil Futures Contracts?

Futures contracts are agreements between

One party agrees to buy a commodity such as crude oil from the other party at a later date at a price and quantity

agreed-upon when the contract is made.

Futures contracts are agreements between two parties.

One party agrees to buy a commodity such as crude oil from the other party at a later date at a price and quantity agreed-upon when the contract is made.

Oil Futures Contracts are traded on futures exchanges, including the NYMEX.

the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts are traded on the NYMEX in units of 1,000 barrels.

Oil Futures Contracts traded on the NYMEX

are priced by floor brokers and other exchange members both through an “open outcry” of offers to purchase or sell

the contracts and through an electronic, screen-based system that determines the price by matching electronically offers to purchase

For example, the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts are traded on the NYMEX in units of 1,000 barrels.

Oil Futures Contracts traded on the NYMEX are priced by floor brokers and other exchange members both through an “open outcry” of offers to purchase or sell the contracts and through an electronic, screen-based system that determines the price by matching electronically offers to purchase and sell.

Additional risks of investing in Oil Futures Contracts are included in “Item 1A.

Risk Factors” in

this annual report on Form 10-K.

Accountability Levels, Position Limits

and Price Fluctuation Limits .

Designated contract markets (“DCMs”), such as the NYMEX and ICE Futures, have established

accountability levels and position limits on the maximum net long or net short futures contracts in commodity interests that any

person or group of persons under common trading control (other than as a hedge, which an investment by USL is not) may hold, own

Risk Factors” in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Accountability Levels, Position Limits and Price Fluctuation Limits .

Designated contract markets (“DCMs”), such as the NYMEX and ICE Futures, have established accountability levels and position limits on the maximum net long or net short futures contracts in commodity interests that any person or group of persons under common trading control (other than as a hedge, which an investment by USL is not) may hold, own or control.

These levels and position limits apply to the futures contracts that USL invests in to meet its investment objective.

In addition to accountability levels and position limits, the NYMEX and ICE Futures also set daily price fluctuation limits on

futures contracts.

The daily price fluctuation limit establishes the maximum amount that the price of a futures contract may vary

either up or down from the previous day’s settlement price.

Once the daily price fluctuation limit has been reached in a

particular futures contract, no trades may be made at a price beyond that limit.

The accountability levels for the Benchmark

Oil Futures Contracts and other Oil Futures Contracts traded on U.S.-based futures exchanges, such as the NYMEX, are not a fixed

ceiling, but rather a threshold above which the NYMEX may exercise greater scrutiny and control over an investor’s positions.

In addition to accountability levels and position limits, the NYMEX and ICE Futures also set daily price fluctuation limits on futures contracts.

The daily price fluctuation limit establishes the maximum amount that the price of a futures contract may vary either up or down from the previous day’s settlement price.

Once the daily price fluctuation limit has been reached in a particular futures contract, no trades may be made at a price beyond that limit.

The accountability levels for the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts and other Oil Futures Contracts traded on U.S.-based futures exchanges, such as the NYMEX, are not a fixed ceiling, but rather a threshold above which the NYMEX may exercise greater scrutiny and control over an investor's positions.

The current accountability level for investments for any one month in the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts is 10,000 contracts.

In addition, the NYMEX imposes an accountability level for all months of 20,000 net futures contracts for light, sweet crude oil.

In addition, the ICE Futures maintains the same accountability levels, position limits and monitoring authority for its light,

sweet crude oil contract as the NYMEX.

If USL and the Related Public Funds exceed these accountability levels for investments in

the futures contracts for light, sweet crude oil, the NYMEX and ICE Futures will monitor such exposure and may ask for further

information on their activities, including the total size of all positions, investment and trading strategy, and the extent of

liquidity resources of USL and the Related Public Funds.

If deemed necessary by the NYMEX and/or ICE Futures, USL could be ordered

to reduce its net oil futures contracts back to the accountability level.

As of December 31, 2019, USL held 940 NYMEX Crude Oil

Futures CL contracts.

As of December 31, 2019, USL did not hold any Oil Futures Contracts traded on the ICE Futures.

ended December 31, 2019, USL did not exceed accountability levels imposed by the NYMEX or ICE Futures, however, the aggregated

total of the Related Public Funds did exceed the accountability levels.

No action was taken by NYMEX and USL did not reduce the

number of Oil Futures Contracts held as a result.

Position limits differ from accountability

levels in that they represent fixed limits on the maximum number of futures contracts that any person may hold and cannot allow

such limits to be exceeded without express CFTC authority to do so.

In addition to accountability levels and position limits that

may apply at any time, the NYMEX and ICE Futures impose position limits on contracts held in the last few days of trading in the

near month contract to expire.

It is unlikely that USL will run up against such position limits because USL’s investment

strategy is to close out its positions and “roll” from the near month contracts to expire to the next month contracts

during a one-day period beginning two weeks from expiration of the contracts.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, USL did not

exceed any position limits imposed by the NYMEX and ICE Futures.

The CFTC has proposed to adopt limits on

speculative positions in 25 physical commodity futures and option contracts as well as swaps that are economically equivalent to

such contracts in the agriculture, energy and metals markets (the “Position Limit Rules”).

The Position Limit Rules

would, among other things:

identify which contracts are subject to speculative position limits;

set thresholds that restrict the

size of speculative positions that a person may hold in the spot month, other individual months, and all months combined;

an exemption for positions that constitute bona fide hedging transactions;

impose responsibilities on DCMs and swap execution facilities

(“SEFs”) to establish position limits or, in some cases, position accountability rules;

and apply to both futures and

swaps across four relevant venues:

OTC, DCMs, SEFs as well as certain non-U.S.

located platforms.

The CFTC’s first attempt

at finalizing the Position Limit Rules, in 2011, was successfully challenged by market participants in 2012 and, since then, the

CFTC has re-proposed them and solicited comments from market participants multiple times.

At this time, it is unclear how the Position

Limit Rules may affect USL, but the effect may be substantial and adverse.

By way of example, the Position Limit Rules may negatively

impact the ability of USL to meet its investment objectives through limits that may inhibit USCF’s ability to sell additional

Creation Baskets of USL.

See "The Commodity Interest Markets-Commodities Regulation"

in this annual report on

Form 10-K for additional information.

Until such time as the Position Limit Rules

are adopted, the regulatory architecture in effect prior to the adoption of the Position Limit Rules will govern transactions in

commodities and related derivatives.

Under that system, the CFTC enforces federal limits on speculation in nine agricultural

products (e.g., corn, wheat and soy), while futures exchanges establish and enforce position limits and accountability levels for

other agricultural products and certain energy products (e.g., oil and natural gas).

As a result, USL may be limited

with respect to the size of its investments in any commodities subject to these limits.

Under existing and recently adopted CFTC

regulations, for the purpose of position limits, a market participant is generally required, subject to certain narrow exceptions,

to aggregate all positions for which that participant controls the trading decisions with all positions for which that participant

has a 10 percent or greater ownership interest in an account or position, as well as the positions of two or more persons acting

pursuant to an express or implied agreement or understanding with that participant (the “Aggregation Rules”).

The Aggregation

Rules will also apply with respect to the Position Limit Rules if and when such Position Limit Rules are adopted.

In addition, ICE Futures maintains accountability levels, position limits and monitoring authority for its futures contracts for light, sweet crude oil.

If USL and the Related Public Funds exceed these accountability levels for investments in the futures contracts for light, sweet crude oil, the NYMEX and ICE Futures will monitor such exposure and may ask for further information on their activities including the total size of all positions, investment and trading strategy, and the extent of liquidity resources of USL and the Related Public Funds.

If deemed necessary by the NYMEX and/or ICE Futures, USL could be ordered to reduce its net futures contracts back to the accountability level.

As of December 31, 2020, USL held 4,069 futures contracts for light, sweet crude oil traded on the NYMEX and did not hold any Oil Futures Contracts traded on the ICE Futures.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, USL did not exceed the accountability levels imposed by the NYMEX or ICE Futures, however, the aggregated total of certain of the Related Public Funds did exceed the accountability levels.

No action was taken by NYMEX and USL did not reduce the number of Oil Futures Contracts held as a result.

USCF received letters from the CME on behalf of the NYMEX Market Regulation Department on April 16, 2020 (the “April 16 CME Letter”) and on April 23, 2020 (the “April 23 CME Letter”, and together with the April 16 CME Letter, the “CME Letters”).

The CME Letters ordered USCF and the Related Public Funds not to exceed accountability levels in specified light, sweet crude oil futures contracts and not to assume any positions in the specified light, sweet crude oil futures contract in excess of the exchange established position limits.

The current accountability levels and position limits are set forth in the April 23 CME Letter which superseded the April 16 CME Letter.

The April 23 CME Letter ordered USCF, USL and the Related Public Funds not to exceed accountability levels in excess of 10,000 futures contracts in the light, sweet crude oil futures contract for June 2020.

Position limits differ from accountability levels in that they represent fixed limits on the maximum number of futures contracts that any person may hold and cannot allow such limits to be exceeded without express CFTC authority to do so.

In addition to accountability levels and position limits that may apply at any time, the NYMEX and ICE Futures impose position limits on contracts held in the last few days of trading in the near month contract to expire.

It is unlikely that USL will run up against such position limits because USL's investment strategy is to close out its positions and “roll” from the

near month contract to expire and the eleven following months to the next month contract to expire and the eleven following months during a one day each month.

The April 23 CME Letter, discussed above, ordered USCF, USL and the Related Public Funds not to assume a position in the light, sweet crude oil futures contract for June 2020 in excess of 15,000 long futures contracts, for July 2020 in 78,000 long futures contracts, for August 2020 in 50,000 long futures contracts, for September 2020 in 35,000 long futures contracts.

The foregoing accountability levels and position limits are subject to change.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, USL did not exceed any position limits imposed by the NYMEX and ICE Futures.

On October 15, 2020, the CFTC approved a final rule that amends the existing federal position limits regime set forth in Part 150 of the CFTC's regulations as well as the framework for exchange-set position limits and exemptions (such final rule, the "Position Limits Rule").

The Position Limits Rule establishes federal position limits for 25 core referenced futures contracts (comprised of agricultural, energy and metals futures contracts), futures and options linked to the core referenced futures contracts, and swaps that are economically equivalent to the core referenced futures contracts.

The Position Limits Rule sets position limits for the spot month and non-spot month;

however, the non-spot month limits only apply in respect of the agricultural futures contracts that are currently subject to position limits under Part 150 of the CFTC regulations (the "legacy agricultural contracts").

With respect to regulatory oversight, the Position Limits Rule delegates authority to designated contract markets and swap execution facilities to oversee certain aspects of the position limits framework.

In addition to setting the federal position limits, the Position Limits Rule also provides several exemptions from such position limits, including an expanded list of enumerated bona fide hedge exemptions and certain spread exemptions.

Further, the Position Limits Rule sets forth two alternative processes for pursuing an exemption for non-enumerated hedge positions.

Other than for the legacy agricultural contracts, compliance with the limits imposed by the Position Limits Rule will not be required until 2022, except that economically equivalent swaps need not comply with the Position Limits Rule until 2023.

The Benchmark Oil Futures Contract will be subject to position limits under the Position Limits Rule, and USL's trading does not qualify as an enumerated bona fide hedge.

Accordingly, the Position Limits Rule could negatively impact the ability of USL to meet its investment objective by inhibiting USCF's ability to effectively invest the proceeds from sales of Creation Baskets of USL in particular amounts and types of its permitted investments.

Until such time as compliance with the Position Limits Rule is required, the regulatory architecture in effect prior to the adoption of the Position Limit Rules will govern transactions in commodities and related derivatives.

Under that system, the CFTC enforces federal limits on speculation in the nine legacy agricultural contracts, while futures exchanges establish and enforce position limits and accountability levels for other agricultural products and certain energy products (e.g., oil and natural gas).

Under existing CFTC regulations and the Position Limits Rule, for the purpose of position limits, a market participant is generally required, subject to certain narrow exceptions, to aggregate all positions for which that participant controls the trading decisions with all positions for which that participant has a 10 percent or greater ownership interest in an account or position, as well as the positions of two or more persons acting pursuant to an express or implied agreement or understanding with that market participant (the “Aggregation Rules”).

Price Volatility.

The price volatility

of Oil Futures Contracts generally has been historically greater than that for traditional securities such as stocks and bonds.

The price volatility of Oil Futures Contracts generally has been historically greater than that for traditional securities such as stocks and bonds.

Price volatility often is greater day-to-day as opposed to intra-day.

Oil Futures Contracts tend to be more volatile than stocks

and bonds because price movements for crude oil are more currently and directly influenced by economic factors for which current

data is available and are traded by crude oil futures traders throughout the day.

Because USL invests a significant portion of

its assets in Oil Futures Contracts, the assets of USL, and therefore the prices of USL’s shares, may be subject to greater

volatility than traditional securities.

Oil Futures Contracts tend to be more volatile than stocks and bonds because price movements for crude oil are more currently and directly influenced by economic factors for which current data is available and are traded by crude oil futures traders throughout the day.

Because USL invests a significant portion of its assets in Oil Futures Contracts, the assets of USL, and therefore the prices of USL’s shares, may be subject to greater volatility than traditional securities.

Marking-to-Market Futures Positions.

Oil Futures Contracts are marked to market at the end of each trading day and the margin required with respect to such contracts

is adjusted accordingly.

Oil Futures Contracts are marked to market at the end of each trading day and the margin required with respect to such contracts is adjusted accordingly.

This process of marking-to-market is designed to prevent losses from accumulating in any futures account.

Therefore, if USL’s futures positions have declined in value, USL may be required to post “variation margin”

to cover this decline.

Alternatively, if USL’s futures positions have increased in value, this increase will be credited

to USL’s account.

Why Does USL Purchase and Sell Oil Futures

USL’s investment objective is for

the daily changes in percentage terms of its shares’ per share NAV to reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of the

average price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts, less USL’s expenses.

USL invests primarily in Oil Futures Contracts.

USL seeks to have its aggregate NAV approximate at all times the aggregate market value of the Oil Futures Contracts (or Other

Oil-Related Investments) it holds.

In connection with investing in Oil Futures

Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments, USL holds Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents that serve as segregated assets

supporting USL’s positions in Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments.

For example, the purchase of an Oil

Futures Contract with a stated value of $10 million would not require USL to pay $10 million upon entering into the contract;

only a margin deposit, generally of 5% to 30% of the stated value of the Oil Futures Contract, would be required.

To secure its

Oil Futures Contract obligations, USL would deposit the required margin with the FCM and would separately hold, through its Custodian,

Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents in an amount equal to the balance of the current market value of the contract, which at

the contract’s inception would be $10 million minus the amount of the margin deposit, or $9.5 million (assuming a 5% margin).

As a result of the foregoing, typically

5% to 30% of USL’s assets are held as margin in segregated accounts with an FCM.

In addition to the Treasuries and cash it

posts with the FCM for the Oil Futures Contracts it owns, USL may hold, through the Custodian or futures commission merchant, Treasuries,

cash and/or cash equivalents that can be posted as additional margin or as other collateral to support its OTC contracts.

income from the Treasuries and/or cash equivalents that it purchases, and on the cash it holds through the Custodian or FCM.

anticipates that the earned income will increase the NAV and limited partners’ capital contribution accounts.

USL reinvests

the earned income, holds it in cash, or uses it to pay its expenses.

If USL reinvests the earned income, it makes investments that

are consistent with its investment objective.

Therefore, if USL’s futures positions have declined in value, USL may be required to post “variation margin” to cover this decline.

Alternatively, if USL’s futures positions have increased in value, this increase will be credited to USL’s account.

Why Does USL Purchase and Sell Oil Futures Contracts?

USL’s investment objective is for the daily percentage changes in the NAV per share to reflect the daily percentage changes of the spot price of light, sweet crude oil, as measured by the daily percentage changes in the average of the prices of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts, plus interest earned on USL’s collateral holdings, less USL’s expenses.

USL seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing so that the average daily percentage change in USL’s NAV for any period of 30 successive valuation days will be within plus/minus ten percent (10%) of the average daily percentage change in the price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract over the same period.

USL’s investment strategy is designed to provide investors with a cost-effective way to invest indirectly in crude oil and to hedge against movements in the spot price of light, sweet crude oil.

In connection with investing in Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments, USL holds Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents that serve as segregated assets supporting USL’s positions in Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments.

For example, the purchase of an Oil Futures Contract with a stated value of $10 million would not require USL to pay $10 million upon entering into the contract;

rather, only a margin deposit, generally of 5% to 30% of the stated value of the Oil Futures Contract, would be required.

To secure its Oil Futures Contract obligations, USL would deposit the required margin with the FCMs and would separately hold, through its Custodian, Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents in an amount equal to the balance of the current market value of the contract, which at the contract’s inception would be $10 million minus the amount of the margin deposit, or $9.5 million (assuming a 5% margin).

As a result of the foregoing, typically 5% to 30% of USL’s assets are held as margin in segregated accounts with an FCM.

In addition to the Treasuries and cash it posts with the FCMs for the Oil Futures Contracts it owns, USL may hold, through the Custodian or futures commission merchant, Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents that can be posted as additional margin or as other collateral to support its OTC contracts.

USL earns income from the Treasuries and/or cash equivalents that it purchases, and on the cash it holds through the Custodian or FCM.

USL anticipates that the earned income will increase the NAV and limited partners’ capital contribution accounts.

USL reinvests the earned income, holds it in cash, or uses it to pay its expenses.

If USL reinvests the earned income, it makes investments that are consistent with its investment objective.

What are the Trading Policies of USL?

USL invests only in Oil Futures Contracts

and Other Oil-Related Investments that, in the opinion of USCF, are traded in sufficient volume to permit the ready taking and

liquidation of positions in these financial interests and other Oil-Related Investments that, in the opinion of USCF, may be readily

liquidated with the original counterparty or through a third party assuming the position of USL.

USL invests only in Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments that, in the opinion of USCF, are traded in sufficient volume to permit the ready taking and liquidation of positions in these financial interests and in Other Oil-Related Investments that, in the opinion of USCF, may be readily liquidated with the original counterparty or through a third party assuming the position of USL.

Spot Commodities

While the crude Oil Futures Contracts traded

can be physically settled, USL does not intend to take or make physical delivery.

USL may from time to time trade in Other Oil-Related

Investments, including contracts based on the spot price of crude oil.

USCF endeavors to have the value of USL’s

Treasuries, cash and cash equivalents, whether held by USL or posted as margin or other collateral, at all times approximate the

aggregate market value of its obligations under its Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments.

Commodity pools’

trading positions in futures contracts or other related investments are typically required to be secured by the deposit of margin

funds that represent only a small percentage of a futures contract’s (or other commodity interest’s) entire market

While USCF has not and does not intend to leverage USL’s assets, it is not prohibited from doing so under the LP Agreement.

Borrowings are not used by USL unless USL

is required to borrow money in the event of physical delivery, if USL trades in cash commodities, or for short-term needs created

by unexpected redemptions.

OTC Derivatives (Including Spreads

and Straddles)

In addition to Oil Futures Contracts, there

are also a number of listed options on the Oil Futures Contracts on the principal futures exchanges.

These contracts offer investors

and hedgers another set of financial vehicles to use in managing exposure to the crude oil market.

Consequently, USL may purchase

options on crude Oil Futures Contracts on these exchanges in pursuing its investment objective.

In addition to the Oil Futures Contracts

and options on the Oil Futures Contracts, there also exists an active non-exchange-traded market in derivatives tied to crude oil.

While the Oil Futures Contracts traded on the exchange can be physically settled, USL does not intend to take or make physical delivery.

USL may from time to time trade in Other Oil-Related Investments, including contracts based on the spot price of crude oil.

USCF endeavors to have the value of USL’s Treasuries, cash and cash equivalents, whether held by USL or posted as margin or other collateral, at all times approximate the aggregate market value of its obligations under its Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments.

Commodity pools’ trading positions in futures contracts or other related investments are typically required to be secured by the deposit of margin funds that represent only a small percentage of a futures contract’s (or other commodity interest’s) entire market value.

Although permitted to do so under its Limited Partnership Agreement, USL has not and does not intend to leverage its assets and makes its investments accordingly.

Consistent with the foregoing, USL's announced investment intentions noted above, and any changes thereto, will take into account the need for USL to make permitted investments that also allow it

to maintain adequate liquidity to meet its margin and collateral requirements and to avoid, to the extent reasonably possible, USL becoming leveraged.

If market conditions require it, these risk reduction procedures may occur on short notice if they occur other than during a roll or rebalance period.

Borrowings are not used by USL, unless USL is required to borrow money in the event of physical delivery, if USL trades in cash commodities, or for short-term needs created by unexpected redemptions.

OTC Derivatives (Including Spreads and Straddles)

In addition to Oil Futures Contracts, there are also a number of listed options on the Oil Futures Contracts on the principal futures exchanges.

These contracts offer investors and hedgers another set of financial vehicles to use in managing exposure to the crude oil market.

Consequently, USL may purchase options on crude Oil Futures Contracts on these exchanges in pursuing its investment objective.

In addition to the Oil Futures Contracts and options on the Oil Futures Contracts, there also exists an active non-exchange-traded market in derivatives tied to crude oil.

These derivatives transactions (also known as OTC contracts) are usually entered into between two parties in private contracts.

Unlike most of the exchange-traded Oil Futures Contracts or exchange-traded options on the Oil Futures Contracts, each party to

such contract bears the credit risk of the other party, i.e., the risk that the other party may not be able to perform its obligations

under its contract.

To reduce the credit risk that arises in connection with such contracts, USL will generally enter into an agreement

with each counterparty based on the Master Agreement published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.

that provides for the netting of its overall exposure to its counterparty.

USCF assesses or reviews, as appropriate,

the creditworthiness of each potential or existing counterparty to an OTC contract pursuant to guidelines approved by USCF’s

USL may enter into certain transactions

where an OTC component is exchanged for a corresponding futures contract (“Exchange for Related Position” or “EFRP”

transactions).

In the most common type of EFRP transaction entered into by USL, the OTC component is the purchase or sale of one

or more baskets of USL shares.

These EFRP transactions may expose USL to counterparty risk during the interim period between the

execution of the OTC component and the exchange for a corresponding futures contract.

Generally, the counterparty risk from the

EFRP transaction will exist only on the day of execution.

USL may employ spreads or straddles in

its trading to mitigate the differences in its investment portfolio and its goal of tracking the price of the Benchmark Oil Futures

USL would use a spread when it chooses to take simultaneous long and short positions in futures written on the same

underlying asset, but with different delivery months.

During the reporting period of this annual

report on Form 10-K, USL limited its OTC activities to EFRP transactions.

USL has not and will not employ the technique,

commonly known as pyramiding, in which the speculator uses unrealized profits on existing positions as variation margin for the

purchase or sale of additional positions in the same or another commodity interest.

Unlike most of the exchange-traded Oil Futures Contracts or exchange-traded options on the Oil Futures Contracts, each party to such contract bears the credit risk of the other party, i.e., the risk that the other party may not be able to perform its obligations under its contract.

To reduce the credit risk that arises in connection with such contracts, USL will generally enter into an agreement with each counterparty based on the Master Agreement published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.

(“ISDA”) that provides for the netting of its overall exposure to its counterparty.

USCF assesses or reviews, as appropriate, the creditworthiness of each potential or existing counterparty to an OTC contract pursuant to guidelines approved by USCF’s Board.

USL may enter into certain transactions where an OTC component is exchanged for a corresponding futures contract (“Exchange for Related Position” or “EFRP” transactions).

In the most common type of EFRP transaction entered into by USL, the OTC component is the purchase or sale of one or more baskets of USL’s shares.

These EFRP transactions may expose USL to counterparty risk during the interim period between the execution of the OTC component and the exchange for a corresponding futures contract.

Generally, the counterparty risk from the EFRP transaction will exist only on the day of execution.

USL may employ spreads or straddles in its trading to mitigate the differences in its investment portfolio and its goal of tracking the price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts.

USL would use a spread when it chooses to take simultaneous long and short positions in futures written on the same underlying asset, but with different delivery months.

During the reporting period of this annual report on Form 10-K, USL has limited its derivatives activities to Oil Futures Contracts and EFRP transactions.

USL has not employed and will not employ the technique, commonly known as pyramiding, in which the speculator uses unrealized profits on existing positions as variation margin for the purchase or sale of additional positions in the same or another commodity interest.

Who are the Service Providers?

In its capacity as the Custodian for USL,

holds USL’s Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents pursuant to a custodial agreement.

registrar and transfer agent for the shares.

In addition, in its capacity as Administrator for USL, BBH&Co.

performs certain

administrative and accounting services for USL and prepares certain SEC, NFA and CFTC reports on behalf of USL.

USCF pays BBH&Co.’s

fees for these services.

BBH&Co.’s principal business

address is 50 Post Office Square, Boston, MA 02110-1548.

BBH&Co., a private bank founded in 1818, is neither a publicly held

company nor insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

is authorized to conduct a commercial banking business

in accordance with the provisions of Article IV of the New York State Banking Law, New York Banking Law §§160–181,

and is subject to regulation, supervision, and examination by the New York State Department of Financial Services.

is also licensed to conduct a commercial banking business by the Commonwealths of Massachusetts and Pennsylvania and is subject

to supervision and examination by the banking supervisors of those states.

USL also employs ALPS Distributors as its

Custodian, Registrar, Transfer Agent, and Administrator

USCF engaged The Bank of New York Mellon ("BNY Mellon"), a New York corporation authorized to do a banking business (“BNY Mellon”), to provide USL and each of the Related Public Funds with certain custodial, administrative and accounting, and transfer agency services, pursuant to the following agreements with BNY Mellon dated as of March 20,

2020 (together, the “BNY Mellon Agreements”), which were effective as of April 1, 2020:

(i) a Custody Agreement;

(ii) a Fund Administration and Accounting Agreement;

and (iii) a Transfer Agency and Service Agreement.

USCF pays the fees of BNY Mellon for its services under the BNY Mellon Agreements and such fees are determined by the parties from time to time.

Brown Brothers Harriman and Co.

("BBH&Co.") previously served as the Administrator, Custodian, Transfer Agent and Fund Accounting Agent for USL and the Related Public Funds prior to BNY Mellon commencing such services on April 1, 2020.

Certain fund accounting and fund administration services rendered by BBH&Co.

to USL and the Related Public Funds terminated on May 31, 2020 to allow for the transition to BNY Mellon.

Marketing Agent

USL also employs ALPS Distributors as its marketing agent.

USCF pays the Marketing Agent an annual fee.

In no event may the aggregate compensation paid to the Marketing

Agent and any affiliate of USCF for distribution-related services in connection with the offering of shares exceed ten percent

(10%) of the gross proceeds of the offering.

ALPS Distributors’ principal

business address is 1290 Broadway, Suite 1100, Denver, CO 80203.

ALPS Distributors is a broker-dealer registered with the SEC

and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and Securities Investor

Protection Corporation.

On October 8, 2013, USCF entered into a

Futures and Cleared Derivatives Transactions Customer Account Agreement with RBC Capital Markets, LLC (“RBC Capital”

or “RBC”) to serve as USL’s FCM, effective October 10, 2013.

This agreement requires RBC Capital to provide services

to USL, as of October 10, 2013, in connection with the purchase and sale of Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments

that may be purchased or sold by or through RBC Capital for USL’s account.

For the period October 10, 2013 and after, USL

pays RBC Capital commissions for executing and clearing trades on behalf of USL.

RBC Capital’s primary address is

500 West Madison Street, Suite 2500, Chicago, Illinois 60661.

Effective October 10, 2013, RBC Capital became the futures clearing

broker for USL.

In no event may the aggregate compensation paid to the Marketing Agent and any affiliate of USCF for distribution-related services in connection with the offering of shares exceed ten percent (10%) of the gross proceeds of the offering.

ALPS Distributors’ principal business address is 1290 Broadway, Suite 1100, Denver, CO 80203.

ALPS Distributors is a broker-dealer registered with the SEC and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation.

Payments to Certain Third Parties

USCF or the Marketing Agent, or an affiliate of USCF or the Marketing Agent, may directly or indirectly make cash payments to certain broker-dealers for participating in activities that are designed to make registered representatives and other professionals more knowledgeable about exchange-traded funds and exchange-traded products, including USL and the Related Public Funds, or for other activities, such as participation in marketing activities and presentations, educational training programs, conferences, the development of technology platforms and reporting systems.

Additionally, pursuant to written agreements, USCF may make payments, out of its own resources, to financial intermediaries in exchange for providing services in connection with the sale or servicing of USL’s shares, including waiving commissions on the purchase or sale of shares of participating exchange-traded products.

Payments to a broker-dealer or intermediary may create potential conflicts of interest between the broker-dealer or intermediary and its clients.

The amounts described above, which may be significant, are paid by USCF and/or the Marketing Agent from their own resources and not from the assets of USL or the Related Public Funds.

Futures Commission Merchants

RBC Capital Markets LLC

On October 8, 2013, USCF entered into a Futures and Cleared Derivatives Transactions Customer Account Agreement with RBC Capital Markets, LLC (“RBC Capital” or “RBC”) to serve as USL’s FCM, effective October 10, 2013.

This agreement requires RBC Capital to provide services to USL, as of October 10, 2013, in connection with the purchase and sale of Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments that may be purchased or sold by or through RBC Capital for USL’s account.

For the period October 10, 2013 and after, USL pays RBC Capital commissions for executing and clearing trades on behalf of USL.

RBC Capital’s primary address is 3 World Financial Center, 200 Vesey St., New York, NY 10281.

Effective October 10, 2013, RBC Capital became the futures clearing broker for USL.

RBC Capital is registered in the United States with FINRA as a broker-dealer and with the CFTC as an FCM.

is a member of various U.S.

RBC Capital is a member of various U.S.

futures and securities exchanges.

RBC Capital is a large broker dealer subject

to many different complex legal and regulatory requirements.

As a result, certain of RBC Capital’s regulators may from time

to time conduct investigations, initiate enforcement proceedings and/or enter into settlements with RBC Capital with respect to

issues raised in various investigations.

RBC Capital complies fully with its regulators in all investigations being conducted and

in all settlements it reaches.

In addition, RBC Capital is and has been subject to a variety of civil legal claims in various jurisdictions,

a variety of settlement agreements and a variety of orders, awards and judgments made against it by courts and tribunals, both

in regard to such claims and investigations.

RBC Capital complies fully with all settlements it reaches and all orders, awards

and judgments made against it.

RBC Capital has been named as a defendant

in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions and other litigation including those described below, arising in

connection with its activities.

Certain of the actual or threatened legal actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or

punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages.

RBC Capital is also involved, in other reviews, investigations

and proceedings (both formal and informal) by governmental and self-regulatory agencies regarding RBC Capital’s business,

including among other matters, accounting and operational matters, certain of which may result in adverse judgments, settlements,

fines, penalties, injunctions or other relief.

RBC Capital contests liability and/or the

amount of damages as appropriate in each pending matter.

In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters,

particularly in cases where claimants seek substantial or indeterminate damages or where investigations and proceedings are in

the early stages, RBC Capital cannot predict the loss or range of loss, if any, related to such matters;

how or if such matters

will be resolved;

RBC Capital is a large broker dealer subject to many different complex legal and regulatory requirements.

As a result, certain of RBC Capital’s regulators may from time to time conduct investigations, initiate enforcement proceedings and/or enter into settlements with RBC Capital with respect to issues raised in various investigations.

RBC Capital complies fully

with its regulators in all investigations being conducted and in all settlements it reaches.

In addition, RBC Capital is and has been subject to a variety of civil legal claims in various jurisdictions, a variety of settlement agreements and a variety of orders, awards and judgments made against it by courts and tribunals, both in regard to such claims and investigations.

RBC Capital complies fully with all settlements it reaches and all orders, awards and judgments made against it.

RBC Capital has been named as a defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions and other litigation including those described below, arising in connection with its activities.

Certain of the actual or threatened legal actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages.

RBC Capital is also involved, in other reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by governmental and self-regulatory agencies regarding RBC Capital’s business, including among other matters, accounting and operational matters, certain of which may result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other relief.

RBC Capital contests liability and/or the amount of damages as appropriate in each pending matter.

In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, particularly in cases where claimants seek substantial or indeterminate damages or where investigations and proceedings are in the early stages, RBC Capital cannot predict the loss or range of loss, if any, related to such matters;

how or if such matters will be resolved;

when they will ultimately be resolved;

or what the eventual settlement, fine, penalty or other relief, if any,

Subject to the foregoing, RBC Capital believes, based on current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that

the outcome of such pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of RBC Capital.

On April 27, 2017, pursuant to an offer

of settlement, a Panel of the Chicago Board of Trade Business Conduct Committee (“Panel”) found that RBC Capital engaged

in EFRP transactions which failed to satisfy the Rules of the Chicago Board of Trade (the “Chicago Board of Trade”)

in one or more ways.

Specifically, the Panel found that RBC Capital traders entered into EFRP trades in which RBC Capital accounts

were on both sides of the transactions.

While the purpose of the transactions was to transfer positions between the RBC Capital

accounts, the Panel found that the manner in which the trades occurred violated the Chicago Board of Trade’s prohibition

on wash trades.

or what the eventual settlement, fine, penalty or other relief, if any, might be.

Subject to the foregoing, RBC Capital believes, based on current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that the outcome of such pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of RBC Capital.

On April 27, 2017, pursuant to an offer of settlement, a Panel of the Chicago Board of Trade Business Conduct Committee (“Panel”) found that RBC Capital engaged in EFRP transactions which failed to satisfy the Rules of the Chicago Board of Trade (the “Chicago Board of Trade”) in one or more ways.

Specifically, the Panel found that RBC Capital traders entered into EFRP trades in which RBC Capital accounts were on both sides of the transactions.

While the purpose of the transactions was to transfer positions between the RBC Capital accounts, the Panel found that the manner in which the trades occurred violated the Chicago Board of Trade’s prohibition on wash trades.

The Panel found that RBC Capital thereby violated CBOT Rules 534 and (legacy) 538.B.

In accordance with

the settlement offer, the Panel ordered RBC Capital to pay a $175,000 fine.

On October 1, 2019, the CFTC issued an order filing

and settling charges against RBCCM for the above activity, as well as related charges.

The order required that RBCCM cease and

desist from violating the applicable regulations, pay a $5 million civil monetary penalty, and comply with various conditions,

including conditions regarding public statements and future cooperation with the CFTC.

On June 18, 2015, in connection with the

Municipalities Continuing Disclosure Cooperation initiative of the SEC, the SEC commenced and settled an administrative proceeding

against RBC Capital for willful violations of Sections 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“1933 Act”)

after the firm self-reported instances in which it conducted inadequate due diligence in certain municipal securities offerings

and as a result, failed to form a reasonable basis for believing the truthfulness of certain material representations in official

statements issued in connection with those offerings.

In accordance with the settlement offer, the Panel ordered RBC Capital to pay a $175,000 fine.

On October 1, 2019, the CFTC issued an order filing and settling charges against RBCCM for the above activity, as well as related charges.

The order required that RBCCM cease and desist from violating the applicable regulations, pay a $5 million civil monetary penalty, and comply with various conditions, including conditions regarding public statements and future cooperation with the CFTC.

On June 18, 2015, in connection with the Municipalities Continuing Disclosure Cooperation initiative of the SEC, the SEC commenced and settled an administrative proceeding against RBC Capital for willful violations of Sections 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“1933 Act”) after the firm self-reported instances in which it conducted inadequate due diligence in certain municipal securities offerings and as a result, failed to form a reasonable basis for believing the truthfulness of certain material representations in official statements issued in connection with those offerings.

RBC Capital paid a fine of $500,000.

RBC Capital and certain affiliates were

named as defendants in a lawsuit relating to their role in transactions involving investments made by a number of Wisconsin school

districts in certain collateralized debt obligations.

These transactions were also the subject of a regulatory investigation, which

was resolved in 2011.

RBC Capital reached a final settlement with all parties in the civil litigation, and the civil action against

RBC Capital was dismissed with prejudice on December 6, 2016.

Beginning in 2015, putative class actions

were brought against RBC Capital and/or Royal Bank of Canada in the U.S., Canada and Israel.

These actions were each brought against

multiple foreign exchange dealers and allege, among other things, collusive behavior in foreign exchange trading.

Various regulators

are also conducting inquiries regarding potential violations of law by a number of banks and other entities, including RBC Capital,

regarding foreign exchange trading.

RBC Capital and certain affiliates were named as defendants in a lawsuit relating to their role in transactions involving investments made by a number of Wisconsin school districts in certain collateralized debt obligations.

These transactions were also the subject of a regulatory investigation, which was resolved in 2011.

RBC Capital reached a final settlement with all parties in the civil litigation, and the civil action against RBC Capital was dismissed with prejudice on December 6, 2016.

Beginning in 2015, putative class actions were brought against RBC Capital and/or Royal Bank of Canada in the U.S., Canada and Israel.

These actions were each brought against multiple foreign exchange dealers and allege, among other things, collusive behavior in foreign exchange trading.

Various regulators are also conducting inquiries regarding potential violations of law by a number of banks and other entities, including RBC Capital, regarding foreign exchange trading.

In August 2018, the U.S.

District Court entered a final order approving RBC Capital’s

pending settlement with class plaintiffs.

Certain institutional plaintiffs opted out of participating in the settlement and have

brought their own claims.

The Canadian class actions and one other U.S.

action that is purportedly brought on behalf of different

classes of plaintiffs also remain pending.

Based on the facts currently known, it is not possible at this time for us to predict

the ultimate outcome of these investigations or proceedings or the timing of their resolution.

On April 13, 2015, RBC Capital’s

affiliate, Royal Bank of Canada Trust Company (Bahamas) Limited (“RBC Bahamas”), was charged in France with complicity

in tax fraud.

District Court entered a final order approving RBC Capital’s pending settlement with class plaintiffs.

Certain institutional plaintiffs opted out of participating in the settlement and have brought their own claims.

The Canadian class actions, one other U.S.

action that is purportedly brought on behalf of different classes of plaintiffs,

and an action filed in Israel remain pending.

Based on the facts currently known, it is not possible at this time for us to predict the ultimate outcome of these investigations or proceedings or the timing of their resolution.

On July 31, 2015, RBC Capital was added as a new defendant in a pending putative class action initially filed in November 2013 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

The action is brought against multiple foreign exchange dealers and alleges collusive behavior, among other allegations, in foreign exchange trading.

Based on the facts currently known, the ultimate resolution of these collective matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on RBC.

On April 13, 2015, RBC Capital’s affiliate, Royal Bank of Canada Trust Company (Bahamas) Limited (“RBC Bahamas”), was charged in France with complicity in tax fraud.

RBC Bahamas believes that its actions did not violate French law and contested the charge in the French court.

trial of this matter has concluded and a verdict was delivered on January 12, 2017, acquitting the company and the other defendants

and on June 29, 2018, the French appellate court affirmed the acquittals.

The trial of this matter has concluded and a verdict was delivered on January 12, 2017, acquitting the company and the other defendants and on June 29, 2018, the French appellate court affirmed the acquittals.

The acquittals are being appealed.

Various regulators and competition and

enforcement authorities around the world, including in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the U.S., are conducting investigations

related to certain past submissions made by panel banks in connection with the setting of the U.S.

dollar London interbank offered

rate (“LIBOR”).

These investigations focus on allegations of collusion between the banks that were on the panel to

make submissions for certain LIBOR rates.

Royal Bank of Canada, RBC Capital’s indirect parent, is a member of certain LIBOR

panels, including the U.S.

Various regulators and competition and enforcement authorities around the world, including in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the U.S., are conducting investigations related to certain past submissions made by panel banks in connection with the setting of the U.S.

dollar London interbank offered rate (“LIBOR”).

These investigations focus on allegations of collusion between the banks that were on the panel to make submissions for certain LIBOR rates.

Royal Bank of Canada, RBC Capital’s indirect parent, is a member of certain LIBOR panels, including the U.S.

dollar LIBOR panel, and has in the past been the subject of regulatory requests for information.

addition, Royal Bank of Canada and other U.S.

dollar panel banks have been named as defendants in private lawsuits filed in the

In addition, Royal Bank of Canada and other U.S.

dollar panel banks have been named as defendants in private lawsuits filed in the U.S.

with respect to the setting of LIBOR including a number of class action lawsuits which have been consolidated before the U.S.

District Court for the Southern District of New York.

The complaints in those private lawsuits assert claims against us and other

panel banks under various U.S.

The complaints in those private lawsuits assert claims against us and other panel banks under various U.S.

laws, including U.S.

antitrust laws, the U.S.

Commodity Exchange Act, and state law.

28, 2018, the motion by the plaintiffs in the class action lawsuits to have the class certified was denied in relation to Royal

Bank of Canada.

As such, unless that ruling is reversed on appeal, Royal Bank of Canada is no longer a defendant in any pending

class action.

antitrust laws, the CEA, and state law.

On February 28, 2018, the motion by the plaintiffs in the class action lawsuits to have the class certified was denied in relation to Royal Bank of Canada.

As such, unless that ruling is reversed on appeal, Royal Bank of Canada is no longer a defendant in any pending class action.

Royal Bank of Canada is still a party to the various individual LIBOR actions.

Based on the facts currently known,

it is not possible at this time for us to predict the ultimate outcome of these investigations or proceedings or the timing of

their resolution.

Based on the facts currently known, it is not possible at this time for us to predict the ultimate outcome of these investigations or proceedings or the timing of their resolution.

Thornburg Mortgage Inc.

and RBC Capital were parties to a master repurchase agreement executed in September 2003 whereby TMST financed its purchase of

residential mortgage-backed securities.

Upon TMST’s default during the financial crisis, RBC Capital valued TMST’s

collateral at allegedly deflated prices.

After TMST’s bankruptcy filing, TMST’s trustee brought suit against RBC Capital

in 2011 for breach of contract.

(“TMST”) and RBC Capital were parties to a master repurchase agreement executed in September 2003 whereby TMST financed its purchase of residential mortgage-backed securities.

Upon TMST’s default during the financial crisis, RBC Capital valued TMST’s collateral at allegedly deflated prices.

After TMST’s bankruptcy filing, TMST’s trustee brought suit against RBC Capital in 2011 for breach of contract.

In 2015, TMST was awarded more than $45 million in damages.

RBC Capital has appealed.

court set a briefing schedule and simultaneously ordered the parties to participate in a mediation.

The parties subsequently reached

an agreement to settle the matter;

a motion to approve the settlement was filed with the bankruptcy court on January 10, 2016 and

granted on February 27, 2017.

On October 14, 2014, the Delaware Court

of Chancery (the “Court of Chancery”) in a class action brought by former shareholders of Rural/Metro Corporation,

held RBC Capital liable for aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty by three Rural/Metro directors, but did not make an

additional award for attorney’s fees.

A final judgment was entered on February 19, 2015 in the amount of US$93 million plus

post judgment interest.

RBC Capital appealed the Court of Chancery’s determination of liability and quantum of damages, and

the plaintiffs cross-appealed the ruling on additional attorneys’ fees.

On November 30, 2015, the Delaware Supreme Court

affirmed the Court of Chancery with respect to both the appeal and cross-appeal.

RBC Capital is cooperating with an investigation

by the SEC relating to this matter.

In particular, the SEC contended that RBC Capital caused materially false and misleading information

to be included in the proxy statement that Rural filed to solicit shareholder approval for the sale in violation of section 14(A)

of the Exchange Act and Rule 14A-9 thereunder.

On August 31, 2016, RBC Capital was ordered by the SEC to cease and desist and paid

$500,000 in disgorgement, plus interest of $77,759 and a civil penalty of $2 million.

Please see RBC Capital’s Form BD,

which is available on the FINRA BrokerCheck program, for more details.

RBC will act only as clearing broker for

USL and as such will be paid commissions for executing and clearing trades on behalf of USL.

RBC has not passed upon the adequacy

or accuracy of this annual report on Form 10-K.

RBC will not act in any supervisory capacity with respect to USCF or participate

in the management of USCF or USL.

RBC is not affiliated with USL or USCF.

Therefore, neither USCF nor USL believes that there are any conflicts of interest with RBC or its trading principals arising from

its acting as USL’s FCM.

Currently, USCF does not employ commodity

trading advisors for trading of USL contracts.

USCF currently does, however, employ SummerHaven Investment Management, LLC as a

trading advisor for USCI and CPER.

If, in the future, USCF does employ commodity trading advisors for USL, it will choose each

advisor based on arm’s-length negotiations and will consider the advisor’s experience, fees and reputation.

Fees and Compensation Arrangements

with USCF and Non-Affiliated Service Providers (1)

The appeals court set a briefing schedule and simultaneously ordered the parties to participate in a mediation.

The parties subsequently reached an agreement to settle the matter;

a motion to approve the settlement was filed with the bankruptcy court on January 10, 2016 and granted on February 27, 2017.

On October 14, 2014, the Delaware Court of Chancery (the “Court of Chancery”) in a class action brought by former shareholders of Rural/Metro Corporation, held RBC Capital liable for aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty by three Rural/Metro directors, but did not make an additional award for attorney’s fees.

A final judgment was entered on February 19, 2015 in the amount of US$93 million plus post judgment interest.

RBC Capital appealed the Court of Chancery’s determination of liability and quantum of damages, and the plaintiffs cross-appealed the ruling on additional attorneys’ fees.

On November 30, 2015, the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Chancery with respect to both the appeal and cross-appeal.

RBC Capital is cooperating with an investigation by the SEC relating to this matter.

In particular, the SEC contended that RBC Capital caused materially false and misleading information to be included in the proxy statement that Rural filed to solicit shareholder approval for the sale in violation of section 14(A) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14A-9 thereunder.

On August 31, 2016, RBC Capital was ordered by the SEC to cease and desist and paid $500,000 in disgorgement, plus interest of $77,759 and a civil penalty of $2 million.

Please see RBC Capital’s Form BD, which is available on the FINRA BrokerCheck program, for more details.

RBC Capital will act only as clearing broker for USL and as such will be paid commissions for executing and clearing trades on behalf of USL.

RBC Capital has not passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this annual report on Form 10-K.

RBC Capital will not act in any supervisory capacity with respect to USCF or participate in the management of USCF or USL.

RBC Capital is not affiliated with USL or USCF.

Therefore, neither USCF nor USL believes that there are any conflicts of interest with RBC Capital or its trading principals arising from its acting as USL’s FCM.

RCG Division of Marex Spectron

On May 28, 2020, USL entered into a Commodity Futures Customer Agreement with RCG Division of Marex Spectron ("RCG") to serve as a FCM for USL.

This agreement requires RCG to provide services to USL in connection with the purchase and sale of Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments that may be purchased or sold by or through RCG for USL's account.

Under this agreement, USL pays RCG commissions for executing and clearing trades on behalf of USL.

RCG's primary address is 360 Madison Avenue, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10017.

RCG is registered in the United States with FINRA as a broker-dealer and with the CFTC as an FCM.

RCG is a member of various U.S.

futures and securities exchanges.

RCG is a large broker dealer subject to many different complex legal and regulatory requirements.

As a result, certain of RCG's regulators may from time to time conduct investigations, initiate enforcement proceedings and/or enter into settlements with RCG with respect to issues raised in various investigations.

RCG complies fully with its regulators in all investigations which may be conducted and in all settlements it may reach.

As of the date hereof, RCG has no material litigation to disclose as that term is defined under the CEA and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

RCG will act only as clearing broker for USL and as such will be paid commissions for executing and clearing trades on behalf of USL.

RCG has not passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this annual report Form 10-K.

RCG will not act in any supervisory capacity with respect to USCF or participate in the management of USCF or USL.

RCG is not affiliated with USL or USCF.

Therefore, neither USCF nor USL believes that there are any conflicts of interest with RCG or its trading principals arising from its acting as USL's FCM.

E D & F Man Capital Markets Inc.

On June 5, 2020, USL entered into a Customer Agreement E D & F Man Capital Markets Inc.

("MCM") to serve as an FCM for USL.

This agreement requires MCM to provide services to USL in connection with the purchase and sale of Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments that may be purchased or sold by or through MCM for USL's account.

Under this agreement, USL pays MCM commissions for executing and clearing trades on behalf of USL.

MCM's primary address is 140 East 45th Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10017.

MCM is registered in the United States with FINRA as a broker-dealer and with the CFTC as an FCM.

MCM is a member of various U.S.

futures and securities exchanges.

MCM is a large broker dealer subject to many different complex legal and regulatory requirements.

As a result, certain of MCM's regulators may from time to time conduct investigations, initiate enforcement proceedings and/or enter into settlements with MCM with respect to issues raised in various investigations.

MCM complies fully with its regulators in all investigations which may be conducted and in all settlements it may reach.

As of the date hereof, MCM has no material litigation to disclose as that term is defined under the CEA and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

MCM will act only as clearing broker for USL and as such will be paid commissions for executing and clearing trades on behalf of USL.

MCM has not passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this annual report on Form 10-K.

MCM will not act in any supervisory capacity with respect to USCF or participate in the management of USCF or USL.

MCM is not affiliated with USL or USCF.

Therefore, neither USCF nor USL believes that there are any conflicts of interest with MCM or its trading principals arising from its acting as USL's FCM.

Macquarie Futures USA LLC

On December 3, 2020, USL engaged Macquarie Futures USA LLC ("MFUSA") to serve as an additional futures commission merchant for USL.

The Customer Agreement between USL and MFUSA requires MFUSA to provide services to USL in connection with the purchase and sale of futures contracts in Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments that may be purchased or sold by or through MFUSA for USL's account.

Under this agreement, USL pays MFUSA commissions for executing and clearing trades on behalf of USL.

MFUSA's primary address is 125 West 55th Street, New York, NY 10019.

MFUSA is registered in the United States with the CFTC as an FCM providing futures execution and clearing services covering futures exchanges globally.

MFUSA is a member of various U.S.

futures and securities exchanges.

MFUSA is a large broker dealer subject to many different complex legal and regulatory requirements.

As a result, certain of MFUSA's regulators may from time to time conduct investigations, initiate enforcement proceedings and/or enter into settlements with MFUSA with respect to issues raised in various investigations.

MFUSA complies fully with its regulators in all investigations which may be conducted and in all settlements it may reach.

As of the date hereof, MFUSA has no material litigation to disclose as that term is defined under the CEA and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

MFUSA will act only as clearing broker for USL and as such will be paid commissions for executing and clearing trades on behalf of USL.

MFUSA has not passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this annual report on Form 10-K.

MFUSA will not act in any supervisory capacity with respect to USCF or participate in the management of USCF or USL.

MFUSA is not affiliated with USL or USCF.

Therefore, neither USCF nor USL believes that there are any conflicts of interest with MFUSA or its trading principals arising from its acting as USL's FCM.

Commodity Trading Advisor

Currently, USCF does not employ commodity trading advisors for the trading of USL contracts.

USCF currently does, however, employ SummerHaven Investment Management, LLC as a trading advisor for USCI and CPER.

If, in the future, USCF does employ commodity trading advisors for USL, it will choose each advisor based on arm’s-length negotiations and will consider the advisor’s experience, fees and reputation.

Summary of Risk Factors

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk.

You should carefully consider the information in "Item 1A.

Risk Factors", including, but not limited to, the following risks:

● The NAV of USL's shares relates directly to the value of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts and other assets held by USL and fluctuations in the prices of these assets could materially adversely affect an investment in USL's shares.

Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results;

all or substantially all of an investment in USL could be lost.

● COVID-19 and other infectious disease outbreaks could negatively affect the valuation and performance of USL's investments.

● An investment in USL may provide little or no diversification benefits.

Thus, in a declining market, USL may have no gains to offset losses from other investments, and an investor may suffer losses on an investment in USL while incurring losses with respect to other asset classes.

● Historical performance of USL and the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts is not indicative of future performance.

● The market price at which investors buy or sell shares may be significantly less or more than NAV.

● Daily percentage changes in USL's NAV may not correlate with daily percentage changes in the average of the prices of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts.

● Daily percentage changes in the price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts may not correlate with daily percentage changes in the spot price of crude oil.

● An investment in USL is not a proxy for investing in the oil markets, and the daily percentage changes in the price of the Benchmark Oil Future Contracts, or the NAV of USL, may not correlate with daily percentage changes in the spot price of crude oil.

● Accountability levels, position limits, and daily price fluctuation limits set by the exchanges have the potential to cause tracking error, by limiting USL's investments, including its ability to fully invest in the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract, which could cause the price of shares to substantially vary from the average of the prices of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract.

● An investor's tax liability may exceed the amount of distributions, if any, on its shares.

● An investor's allocable share of taxable income or loss may differ from its economic income or loss on its shares.

● Items of income, gain, deduction, loss and credit with respect to shares could be reallocated, and USL could be liable for U.S.

federal income tax, if the U.S.

Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") does not accept the assumptions and conventions applied by USL in allocating those items, with potential adverse consequences for an investor.

● USL could be treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes, which may substantially reduce the value of the shares.

● USL is organized and operated as a limited partnership in accordance with the provisions of the LP Agreement and applicable state law, and therefore, USL has a more complex tax treatment than traditional mutual funds.

● If USL is required to withhold tax with respect to any Non-U.S.

shareholders, the cost of such withholding may be borne by all shareholders.

● The impact of U.S.

tax reform on USL is uncertain.

● USL will be subject to credit risk with respect to counterparties to OTC contracts entered into by USL or held by special purpose or structured vehicles.

● Valuing OTC derivatives may be less certain than actively traded financial instruments.

Fees and Compensation Arrangements with USCF and Non-Affiliated Service Providers (1)

Service Provider

2 unchanged sentences

Minimum amount of $75,000 annually for its custody, fund accounting and fund administration services rendered to all funds, as well as a $20,000 annual fee for its transfer agency services.

In addition, an asset-based charge of (a) 0.06% for the first $500 million of USL and the Related Public Funds’ combined net assets, (b) 0.0465% for USL and the Related Public Funds’ combined net assets greater than $500 million but less than $1 billion, and (c) 0.035% once USL and the Related Public Funds’ combined net assets exceed $1 billion.

In addition, an asset-based charge of (a) 0.06% for the first $500 million of USL’s and the Related Public Funds’ combined net assets, (b) 0.0465% for USL’s and the Related Public Funds’ combined net assets greater than $500 million but less than $1 billion, and (c) 0.035% once USL’s and the Related Public Funds’ combined net assets exceed $1 billion.

BNY Mellon, Custodian and Administrator (4)

Provides custody, fund accounting fund administration and transfer agency services to USL and the Related Public Funds' based on average AUM.

The annual fees for USL and the combined Related Public Funds' may range from $0.4 million to $2.4 million depending on average AUM for any given year.

ALPS Distributors - Marketing Agent

1 unchanged sentence

USCF pays this compensation.

(2) The annual minimum amount will not apply if the asset-based charge for all accounts in the aggregate

exceeds $75,000.

The annual minimum amount will not apply if the asset-based charge for all accounts in the aggregate exceeds $75,000.

USCF also will pay transaction charge fees to BBH&Co., ranging from $7 to $15 per transaction for the funds.

provided certain fund accounting and fund administration services to USL through May 31, 2020.

BNY Mellon has served as the Custodian and Administrator of USL since April 1, 2020.

Compensation to USCF

USL is contractually obligated to pay USCF

a management fee based on 0.60% per annum on its average daily total net assets.

Fees are calculated on a daily basis (accrued

at 1/365 of the applicable percentage of total net assets on that day) and paid on a monthly basis.

Total net assets are calculated

by taking the current market value of USL’s total assets and subtracting any liabilities.

Fees and Compensation Arrangements

between USL and Non-Affiliated Service Providers (3)

USL is contractually obligated to pay USCF a management fee based on 0.60% per annum on its average daily total net assets.

Fees are calculated on a daily basis (accrued at 1/366 of the applicable percentage of total net assets on that day) and paid on a monthly basis.

Total net assets are calculated by taking the current market value of USL’s total assets and subtracting any liabilities.

Fees and Compensation Arrangements between USL and Non-Affiliated Service Providers (5)

Service Provider

3 unchanged sentences

charges may vary

RCG Division of Marex Spectron, Futures Commission Merchant

E D & F Man Capital Markets Inc., Futures Commission Merchant

MFUSA, Futures Commission Merchant

USL pays this compensation.

New York Mercantile Exchange Licensing

Fee (4) - 0.015% on all net assets

(4) Fees are calculated on a daily basis (accrued at 1/365 of the applicable percentage of NAV on that

day) and paid on a monthly basis.

USL is responsible for its pro rata share of the assets held by USL and the Related Public Funds,

other than BNO, USCI and CPER.

Expenses Paid or Accrued by USL from

Inception through December 31, 2019 in dollar terms:

Amount in Dollar Terms

New York Mercantile Exchange Licensing Fee (6) - 0.015% on all net assets.

Fees are calculated on a daily basis (accrued at 1/366 of the applicable percentage of NAV on that day) and paid on a monthly basis.

USL is responsible for its pro rata share of the assets held by USL and the Related Public Funds, other than BNO, USCI and CPER.

Expenses Paid or Accrued by USL from Inception through December 31, 2020 in dollar terms:

Amount in Dollar

Amount Paid or Accrued to USCF:

2 unchanged sentences

Total Expenses Paid or Accrued:

Expenses Waived (6) :

Expense Waived (8) :

Total Expenses Paid or Accrued Including Expenses Waived:

(5) Includes expenses relating to the registration of additional shares, legal fees, auditing fees,

printing expenses, licensing fees, tax reporting fees, prepaid insurance expenses and miscellaneous expenses and fees and expenses

paid to the independent directors of USCF.

(6) USCF had voluntarily agreed to pay certain expenses normally borne by USL to the extent that such

expenses exceeded 0.15% (15 basis points) of USL’s NAV, on an annualized basis, through March 31, 2009.

As of March 31, 2009,

the expense waiver was no longer in effect for USL.

Paid or Accrued by USL from Inception through December 31, 2019 as a Percentage of Average Daily Net Assets:

Amount as a Percentage

of Average Daily Net Assets

Includes expenses relating to the registration of additional shares, legal fees, auditing fees, printing expenses, licensing fees, tax reporting fees, prepaid insurance expenses and miscellaneous expenses and fees and expenses paid to the independent directors of USCF.

USCF had voluntarily agreed to pay certain expenses normally borne by USL to the extent that such expenses exceeded 0.15% (15 basis points) of USL’s NAV, on an annualized basis, through March 31, 2009.

As of March 31, 2009, the expense waiver was no longer in effect for USL.

Expenses Paid or Accrued by USL from Inception through December 31, 2020 as a Percentage of Average Daily Net Assets:

of Average Daily Net

Amount Paid or Accrued to USCF:

10 unchanged sentences

0.86% annualized

(7) Includes expenses relating to the registration of additional shares, legal fees, auditing fees,

printing expenses, licensing fees, tax reporting fees, prepaid insurance expenses and miscellaneous expenses and fees and expenses

paid to the independent directors of USCF.

(8) USCF had voluntarily agreed to pay certain expenses normally borne by USL to the extent that such

expenses exceeded 0.15% (15 basis points) of USL’s NAV, on an annualized basis, through March 31, 2009.

As of March 31, 2009,

the expense waiver was no longer in effect for USL.

USL also pays

the fees and expenses associated with its audit expenses, tax accounting and reporting requirements.

These fees were approximately

$131,500 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

In addition, USL is responsible for paying its portion of the directors’

and officers’ liability insurance for USL and the Related Public Funds and the fees and expenses of the independent directors

who also serve as audit committee members of USL and the Related Public Funds organized as limited partnerships and, as of July

8, 2011, those Related Public Funds organized as a series of a Delaware statutory trust.

USL shares the fees and expenses on a

pro rata basis with each Related Public Fund, as described above, based on the relative assets of each fund computed on a daily

USCF had voluntarily agreed to pay certain expenses normally borne by USL to the extent that such expenses exceeded 0.15% (15 basis points) of USL's NAV, on an annualized basis, through March 31, 2009.

As of March 31, 2009, the expense waiver was no longer in effect for USL.

USL also pays the fees and expenses associated with its audit expenses, tax accounting and reporting requirements.

These fees were approximately $172,800 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

In addition, USL is responsible for paying its portion of the directors’ and officers’ liability insurance for USL and the Related Public Funds and the fees and expenses of the independent directors who also serve as audit committee members of USL and the Related Public Funds organized as limited partnerships and, as of July 8, 2011, those Related Public Funds organized as a series of a Delaware statutory trust.

USL shares the fees and expenses on a pro rata basis with each Related Public Fund, as described above, based on the relative assets of each fund computed on a daily basis.

These fees and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020 were $585,896 for USL and the Related Public Funds.

portion of such fees and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $13,028.

USL’s portion of such fees and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $17,435.

Form of Shares

Registered Form.

issued in registered form in accordance with the LP Agreement.

The Administrator has been appointed registrar and transfer agent

for the purpose of transferring shares in certificated form.

The Administrator keeps a record of all limited partners and holders

of the shares in certificated form in the registry.

USCF recognizes transfers of shares in certificated form only if done in accordance

with the LP Agreement.

The beneficial interests in such shares are held in book-entry form through participants and/or accountholders

in the Depository Trust Company (“DTC”).

Individual certificates

are not issued for the shares.

Instead, shares are represented by one or more global certificates, which are deposited by the Administrator

with DTC and registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC.

The global certificates evidence all of the shares outstanding

Shares are issued in registered form in accordance with the LP Agreement.

The Administrator has been appointed registrar and transfer agent for the purpose of transferring shares in certificated form.

The Administrator keeps a record of all limited partners and holders of the shares in certificated form in the registry.

USCF recognizes transfers of shares in certificated form only if done in accordance with the LP Agreement.

The beneficial interests in such shares are held in book-entry form through participants and/or accountholders in the Depository Trust Company (“DTC”).

Individual certificates are not issued for the shares.

Instead, shares are represented by one or more global certificates, which are deposited by the Administrator with DTC and registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC.

The global certificates evidence all of the shares outstanding at any time.

Shareholders are limited to:

(1) participants in DTC such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies (“DTC

Participants”), (2) those who maintain, either directly or indirectly, a custodial relationship with a DTC Participant (“Indirect

Participants”), and (3) those banks, brokers, dealers, trust companies and others who hold interests in the shares through

DTC Participants or Indirect Participants, in each case who satisfy the requirements for transfers of shares.

DTC Participants

acting on behalf of investors holding shares through such participants’ accounts in DTC will follow the delivery practice

applicable to securities eligible for DTC’s Same-Day Funds Settlement System.

Shares are credited to DTC Participants’

securities accounts following confirmation of receipt of payment.

DTC has advised USL

It is a limited purpose trust company organized under the laws of the State of New York and is a member of the Federal

Reserve System, a “clearing corporation” within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code and a “clearing

agency” registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the Exchange Act.

DTC holds securities for DTC Participants

and facilitates the clearance and settlement of transactions between DTC Participants through electronic book-entry changes in

accounts of DTC Participants.

(1) participants in DTC such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies (“DTC Participants”), (2) those who maintain, either directly or indirectly, a custodial relationship with a DTC Participant (“Indirect Participants”), and (3) those banks, brokers, dealers, trust companies and others who hold interests in the shares through DTC Participants or Indirect Participants, in each case who satisfy the requirements for transfers of shares.

DTC Participants acting on behalf of investors holding shares through such participants’ accounts in DTC will follow the delivery practice applicable to securities eligible for DTC’s Same-Day Funds Settlement System.

Shares are credited to DTC Participants’ securities accounts following confirmation of receipt of payment.

DTC has advised USL as follows:

It is a limited purpose trust company organized under the laws of the State of New York and is a member of the Federal Reserve System, a “clearing corporation” within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code and a “clearing agency” registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the Exchange Act.

DTC holds securities for DTC Participants and facilitates the clearance and settlement of transactions between DTC Participants through electronic book-entry changes in accounts of DTC Participants.

Calculating Per Share NAV

USL’s per share NAV is calculated

USL’s per share NAV is calculated by:

● Taking the current market value of its total assets;

1 unchanged sentence

● Dividing that total by the total number of outstanding shares.

The Administrator calculates the per share

NAV of USL once each NYSE Arca trading day.

The Administrator calculates the per share NAV of USL once each NYSE Arca trading day.

The per share NAV for a normal trading day is released after 4:00 p.m.

2 unchanged sentences

New York time.

The Administrator uses the

NYMEX closing price (determined at the earlier of the close of the NYMEX or 2:30 p.m.

New York time) for the Oil Futures Contracts

traded on the NYMEX, but calculates or determines the value of all other USL investments (including Oil Futures Contracts not traded

on the NYMEX, Other Oil-Related Investments and Treasuries), using market quotations, if available, or other information customarily

used to determine the fair value of such investments as of the earlier of the close of the NYSE Arca or 4:00 p.m.

New York time,

in accordance with the current Administrative Agency Agreement among BBH&Co., USL and USCF.

“Other information”

customarily used in determining fair value includes information consisting of market data in the relevant market supplied by one

or more third parties including, without limitation, relevant rates, prices, yields, yield curves, volatilities, spreads, correlations

or other market data in the relevant market;

or information of the types described above from internal sources if that information

is of the same type used by USL in the regular course of its business for the valuation of similar transactions.

The information

may include costs of funding, to the extent costs of funding are not and would not be a component of the other information being

Third parties supplying quotations or market data may include, without limitation, dealers in the relevant markets, end-users

of the relevant product, information vendors, brokers and other sources of market information.

In addition, in order to provide updated

information relating to USL for use by investors and market professionals, the NYSE Arca calculates and disseminates throughout

the core trading session on each trading day an updated indicative fund value.

The indicative fund value is calculated by using

the prior day’s closing per share NAV of USL as a base and updating that value throughout the trading day to reflect changes

in the most recently reported trade price for the active light, sweet Oil Futures Contracts on the NYMEX.

The prices reported for

those Oil Futures Contract months are adjusted based on the prior day’s spread differential between settlement values for

the relevant contract and the spot month contract.

In the event that the spot month contract is also the Benchmark Oil Futures

Contracts, the last sale price for that contract is not adjusted.

The indicative fund value share basis disseminated during NYSE

Arca core trading session hours should not be viewed as an actual real time update of the per share NAV, because the per share

NAV is calculated only once at the end of each trading day based upon the relevant end of day values of USL’s investments.

The indicative fund value is disseminated

on a per share basis every 15 seconds during regular NYSE Arca core trading session hours of 9:30 a.m.

The Administrator uses the NYMEX closing price (determined at the earlier of the close of the NYMEX or 2:30 p.m.

New York time) for the Oil Futures Contracts traded on the NYMEX, but calculates or determines the value of all other USL investments (including Oil Futures Contracts not traded on the NYMEX, Other Oil-Related Investments and Treasuries), using market quotations, if available, or other information customarily used to determine the fair value of such investments as of the earlier of the close of the NYSE Arca or 4:00 p.m.

New York time, in accordance with the current Administrative Agency Agreement among BNY Mellon., USL and USCF.

“Other information” customarily used in determining fair value includes information consisting of market data in the relevant market supplied by one or more third parties including, without limitation, relevant rates, prices, yields, yield curves, volatilities, spreads, correlations or other market data in the relevant market;

or information of the types described above from internal sources if that information is of the same type used by USL in the regular course of its business for the valuation of similar transactions.

The information may include costs of funding, to the extent costs of funding are not and would not be a component of the other information being utilized.

Third parties supplying quotations or market data may include, without limitation, dealers in the relevant markets, end-users of the relevant product, information vendors, brokers and other sources of market information.

In addition, in order to provide updated information relating to USL for use by investors and market professionals, the NYSE Arca calculates and disseminates throughout the core trading session on each trading day an updated indicative fund value.

The indicative fund value is calculated by using the prior day’s closing per share NAV of USL as a base and updating that value throughout the trading day to reflect changes in the most recently reported trade price for the active

light, sweet Oil Futures Contracts on the NYMEX.

The prices reported for those Oil Futures Contract months are adjusted based on the prior day’s spread differential between settlement values for the relevant contract and the spot month contract.

In the event that the spot month contract is also the Benchmark Oil Futures Contracts, the last sale price for that contract is not adjusted.

The indicative fund value share basis disseminated during NYSE Arca core trading session hours should not be viewed as an actual real time update of the per share NAV, because the per share NAV is calculated only once at the end of each trading day based upon the relevant end of day values of USL’s investments.

The indicative fund value is disseminated on a per share basis every 15 seconds during regular NYSE Arca core trading session hours of 9:30 a.m.

New York time to 4:00 p.m.

3 unchanged sentences

New York time.

This means that there

is a gap in time at the beginning and the end of each day during which USL’s shares are traded on the NYSE Arca, but real-time

NYMEX trading prices for Oil Futures Contracts traded on the NYMEX are not available.

During such gaps in time, the indicative

fund value will be calculated based on the end of day price of such Oil Futures Contracts from the NYMEX’s immediately preceding

trading session.

In addition, other Oil Futures Contracts, Other Oil-Related Investments and Treasuries held by USL will be valued

by the Administrator, using rates and points received from client-approved third party vendors (such as Reuters and WM Company)

and advisor quotes.

This means that there is a gap in time at the beginning and the end of each day during which USL’s shares are traded on the NYSE Arca, but real-time NYMEX trading prices for Oil Futures Contracts traded on the NYMEX are not available.

During such gaps in time, the indicative fund value will be calculated based on the end of day price of such Oil Futures Contracts from the NYMEX’s immediately preceding trading session.

In addition, other Oil Futures Contracts, Other Oil-Related Investments and Treasuries held by USL will be valued by the Administrator, using rates and points received from client-approved third party vendors (such as Reuters and WM Company) and advisor quotes.

These investments will not be included in the indicative fund value.

The NYSE Arca disseminates the indicative

fund value through the facilities of CTA/CQ High Speed Lines.

In addition, the indicative fund value is published on the NYSE Arca’s

website and is available through on-line information services such as Bloomberg and Reuters.

Dissemination of the indicative fund value

provides additional information that is not otherwise available to the public and is useful to investors and market professionals

in connection with the trading of USL shares on the NYSE Arca.

Investors and market professionals are able throughout the trading

day to compare the market price of USL and the indicative fund value.

If the market price of USL shares diverges significantly

from the indicative fund value, market professionals will have an incentive to execute arbitrage trades.

For example, if USL appears

to be trading at a discount compared to the indicative fund value, a market professional could buy USL shares on the NYSE Arca

and sell short Oil Futures Contracts.

Such arbitrage trades can tighten the tracking between the market price of USL and the indicative

fund value and thus can be beneficial to all market participants.

The NYSE Arca disseminates the indicative fund value through the facilities of CTA/CQ High Speed Lines.

In addition, the indicative fund value is published on the NYSE Arca’s website and is available through on-line information services such as Bloomberg and Reuters.

Dissemination of the indicative fund value provides additional information that is not otherwise available to the public and is useful to investors and market professionals in connection with the trading of USL shares on the NYSE Arca.

Investors and market professionals are able throughout the trading day to compare the market price of USL and the indicative fund value.

If the market price of USL shares diverges significantly from the indicative fund value, market professionals will have an incentive to execute arbitrage trades.

For example, if USL appears to be trading at a discount compared to the indicative fund value, a market professional could buy USL shares on the NYSE Arca and sell short Oil Futures Contracts.

Such arbitrage trades can tighten the tracking between the market price of USL and the indicative fund value and thus can be beneficial to all market participants.

Creation and Redemption of Shares

USL creates and redeems shares from time

to time, but only in one or more Creation Baskets or Redemption Baskets.

The creation and redemption of baskets are only made in

exchange for delivery to USL or the distribution by USL of the amount of Treasuries and any cash represented by the baskets being

created or redeemed, the amount of which is based on the combined NAV of the number of shares included in the baskets being created

or redeemed determined after 4:00 p.m.

USL creates and redeems shares from time to time, but only in one or more Creation Baskets or Redemption Baskets.

The creation and redemption of baskets are only made in exchange for delivery to USL or the distribution by USL of the amount of Treasuries and any cash represented by the baskets being created or redeemed, the amount of which is based on the combined NAV of the number of shares included in the baskets being created or redeemed determined as of 4:00 p.m.

New York time on the day the order to create or redeem baskets is properly received.

Authorized Participants are the only persons

that may place orders to create and redeem baskets.

Authorized Participants must be (1) registered broker-dealers or other securities

market participants, such as banks and other financial institutions, that are not required to register as broker-dealers to engage

in securities transactions as described below, and (2) DTC Participants.

To become an Authorized Participant, a person must enter

into an Authorized Participant Agreement with USCF on behalf of USL (each such agreement, an “Authorized Participant Agreement”).

The Authorized Participant Agreement provides the procedures for the creation and redemption of baskets and for the delivery of

the Treasuries and any cash required for such creations and redemptions.

The Authorized Participant Agreement and the related procedures

attached thereto may be amended by USL, without the consent of any limited partner or shareholder or Authorized Participant.

Participants pay USL a $350 transaction fee for each order placed to create one or more Creation Baskets or to redeem one or more

Redemption Baskets.

Authorized Participants who make deposits with USL in exchange for baskets receive no fees, commissions or

other form of compensation or inducement of any kind from either USL or USCF, and no such person will have any obligation or responsibility

to USCF or USL to effect any sale or resale of shares.

As of December 31, 2019, 10 Authorized Participants had entered into agreements

with USCF on behalf of USL.

Authorized Participants are the only persons that may place orders to create and redeem baskets.

Authorized Participants must be:

(1) registered broker-dealers or other securities market participants, such as banks and other financial institutions, that are not required to register as broker-dealers to engage in securities transactions as described below, and (2) DTC Participants.

To become an Authorized Participant, a person must enter into an Authorized Participant Agreement with USCF on behalf of USL (each such agreement, an “Authorized Participant Agreement”).

The Authorized Participant Agreement provides the procedures for the creation and redemption of baskets and for the delivery of the Treasuries and any cash required for such creations and redemptions.

The Authorized Participant Agreement and the related procedures attached thereto may be amended by USL, without the consent of any limited partner or shareholder or Authorized Participant.

Authorized Participants pay a transaction fee of $350 to USL for each order placed to create one or more Creation Baskets or to redeem one or more Redemption Baskets.

The transaction fee may be reduced, increased, or otherwise changed by USCF.

Authorized Participants who make deposits with USL in exchange for baskets receive no fees, commissions or other form of compensation or inducement of any kind from either USL or USCF, and no such person will have any obligation or responsibility to USL or USCF to effect any sale or resale of shares.

As of December 31, 2020, 10 Authorized Participants had entered into agreements with USCF on behalf of USL.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, USL issued 575 Creation Baskets and redeemed (395) Redemption Baskets.

Certain Authorized Participants are expected

to be capable of participating directly in the physical crude oil market and the crude oil futures market.

In some cases, Authorized

Participants or their affiliates may from time to time buy crude oil or sell crude oil or Oil Interests and may profit in these

USCF believes that the size and operation of the crude oil market make it unlikely that an Authorized Participant’s

direct activities in the crude oil or securities markets will significantly affect the price of crude oil, Oil Interests, or the

price of the shares.

Each Authorized Participant is required

to be registered as a broker-dealer under the Exchange Act and is a member in good standing with FINRA, or exempt from being or

otherwise not required to be registered as a broker-dealer or a member of FINRA, and qualified to act as a broker or dealer in

the states or other jurisdictions where the nature of its business so requires.

Certain Authorized Participants may also be regulated

under federal and state banking laws and regulations.

Each Authorized Participant has its own set of rules and procedures, internal

controls and information barriers as it determines is appropriate in light of its own regulatory regime.

Under the Authorized Participant Agreement,

USCF, and USL under limited circumstances, have agreed to indemnify the Authorized Participants against certain liabilities, including

liabilities under the Securities Act and to contribute to the payments the Authorized Participants may be required to make in respect

of those liabilities.

The following description of the procedures

for the creation and redemption of baskets is only a summary and an investor should refer to the relevant provisions of the LP

Agreement and the form of Authorized Participant Agreement for more detail, each of which is incorporated by reference into this

annual report on Form 10-K.

Certain Authorized Participants are expected to be capable of participating directly in the physical crude oil market and the crude oil futures market.

In some cases, Authorized Participants or their affiliates may from time to time buy or sell crude oil or Crude Oil Interests and may profit in these instances.

USCF believes that the size and operation of the crude oil market make it unlikely that an Authorized Participant’s direct activities in the crude oil or securities markets will significantly affect the price of crude oil, Crude Oil Interests or the price of the shares.

Each Authorized Participant is required to be registered as a broker-dealer under the Exchange Act and is a member in good standing with FINRA, or exempt from being or otherwise not required to be registered as a broker-dealer or a member of FINRA, and qualified to act as a broker or dealer in the states or other jurisdictions where the nature of its business so requires.

Certain Authorized Participants may also be regulated under federal and state banking laws and regulations.

Each Authorized Participant has its own set of rules and procedures, internal controls and information barriers as it determines is appropriate in light of its own regulatory regime.

Under the Authorized Participant Agreement, USCF, and USL under limited circumstances, have agreed to indemnify the Authorized Participants against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the 1933 Act, and to contribute to the payments the Authorized Participants may be required to make in respect of those liabilities.

The following description of the procedures for the creation and redemption of baskets is only a summary and an investor should refer to the relevant provisions of the LP Agreement and the form of Authorized Participant Agreement for more detail, each of which is incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 10-K.

Creation Procedures

On any business day, an Authorized Participant

may place an order with the Marketing Agent to create one or more baskets.

For purposes of processing purchase and redemption orders,

a “business day” means any day other than a day when any of the NYSE Arca, the NYMEX or the NYSE is closed for regular

On any business day, an Authorized Participant may place an order with the Marketing Agent to create one or more baskets.

For purposes of processing purchase and redemption orders, a “business day” means any day other than a day when any of the NYSE Arca, the NYMEX or the NYSE is closed for regular trading.

Purchase orders must be placed by 12:00 p.m.

New York time or the close of regular trading on the NYSE Arca, whichever

New York time or the close of regular trading on the NYSE Arca, whichever is earlier.

The day on which the Marketing Agent receives a valid purchase order is referred to as the purchase order date.

By placing a purchase order, an Authorized

Participant agrees to deposit Treasuries, cash, or a combination of Treasuries and cash, as described below.

Prior to the delivery

of baskets for a purchase order, the Authorized Participant must also have wired to the Custodian the non-refundable transaction

fee due for the purchase order.

Authorized Participants may not withdraw a creation request, except as otherwise set forth in the

procedures in the Authorized Participant Agreement.

The manner by which creations are made

is dictated by the terms of the Authorized Participant Agreement.

By placing a purchase order, an Authorized Participant agrees

to (1) deposit Treasuries, cash, or a combination of Treasuries and cash with the Custodian, and (2) if required by USCF in its

sole discretion, enter into or arrange for a block trade, an exchange for physical or exchange for swap, or any other OTC energy

transaction (through itself or a designated acceptable broker) with USL for the purchase of a number and type of futures contracts

at the closing settlement price for such contracts on the purchase order date.

If an Authorized Participant fails to consummate

(1) and (2), the order shall be cancelled.

The number and type of contracts specified shall be determined by USCF, in its sole

discretion, to meet USL’s investment objective and shall be purchased as a result of the Authorized Participant’s purchase

By placing a purchase order, an Authorized Participant agrees to deposit Treasuries, cash, or a combination of Treasuries and cash, as described below.

Prior to the delivery of baskets for a purchase order, the Authorized Participant must also have wired to the Custodian the non-refundable transaction fee due for the purchase order.

Authorized Participants may not withdraw a Creation Basket request, except as otherwise set forth in the procedures in the Authorized Participant Agreement.

The manner by which creations are made is dictated by the terms of the Authorized Participant Agreement.

By placing a purchase order, an Authorized Participant agrees to (1) deposit Treasuries, cash, or a combination of Treasuries and cash with the Custodian, and (2) if required by USCF in its sole discretion, enter into or arrange for a block trade, an exchange for physical or exchange for swap, or any other OTC energy transaction (through itself or a designated acceptable broker) with USL for the purchase of a number and type of futures contracts at the closing settlement price for such contracts on the purchase order date.

If an Authorized Participant fails to consummate (1) and (2), the order shall be cancelled.

The number and types of contracts specified shall be determined by USCF, in its sole discretion, to meet USL’s investment objective and shall be purchased as a result of the Authorized Participant’s purchase of shares.

Determination of Required Deposits

The total deposit required to create each

basket (“Creation Basket Deposit”) is the amount of Treasuries and/or cash that is in the same proportion to the total

assets of USL (net of estimated accrued but unpaid fees, expenses and other liabilities) on the purchase order date as the number

of shares to be created under the purchase order is in proportion to the total number of shares outstanding on the purchase order

USCF determines, directly in its sole discretion or in consultation with the Administrator, the requirements for Treasuries

and the amount of cash, including the maximum permitted remaining maturity of a Treasury and proportions of Treasury and cash that

may be included in deposits to create baskets.

The Marketing Agent will publish such requirements at the beginning of each business

The amount of cash deposit required is the difference between the aggregate market value of the Treasuries required to be

included in a Creation Basket Deposit as of 4:00 p.m.

New York time on the date the order to purchase is properly received and

the total required deposit.

The total deposit required to create each Creation Basket (“Creation Basket Deposit”) is the amount of Treasuries and/or cash that is in the same proportion to the total assets of USL (net of estimated accrued but unpaid fees, expenses and other liabilities) on the purchase order date as the number of shares to be created under the purchase order is in proportion to the total number of shares outstanding on the purchase order date.

USCF determines, directly in its sole discretion or in consultation with the Administrator, the requirements for Treasuries and the amount of cash, including the maximum permitted remaining maturity of a Treasury and proportions of Treasury and cash that may be included in deposits to create baskets.

The Marketing Agent will publish such requirements at the beginning of each business day.

The amount of cash deposit required is the difference between the aggregate market value of the Treasuries required to be included in a Creation

Basket Deposit as of 4:00 p.m.

New York time on the date the order to purchase is properly received and the total required deposit.

Delivery of Required Deposits

An Authorized Participant who places a

purchase order is responsible for transferring to USL’s account with the Custodian the required amount of Treasuries and

cash by the end of the second business day following the purchase order date.

Upon receipt of the deposit amount, the Administrator

directs DTC to credit the number of baskets ordered to the Authorized Participant’s DTC account on the second business day

following the purchase order date.

The expense and risk of delivery and ownership of Treasuries until such Treasuries have been

received by the Custodian on behalf of USL shall be borne solely by the Authorized Participant.

Because orders to purchase baskets must

be placed by 12:00 p.m., New York time, but the total payment required to create a basket during the continuous offering period

will not be determined until after 4:00 p.m.

New York time on the date the purchase order is received, Authorized Participants

will not know the total amount of the payment required to create a basket at the time they submit an irrevocable purchase order

for the basket.

USL’s per share NAV and the total amount of the payment required to create a basket could rise or fall substantially

between the time an irrevocable purchase order is submitted and the time the amount of the purchase price in respect thereof is

An Authorized Participant who places a purchase order is responsible for transferring to USL’s account with the Custodian the required amount of Treasuries and cash by the end of the second business day following the purchase order date.

Upon receipt of the deposit amount, the Administrator directs DTC to credit the number of baskets ordered to the Authorized Participant’s DTC account on the second business day following the purchase order dates.

The expense and risk of delivery and ownership of Treasuries until such Treasuries have been received by the Custodian on behalf of USL shall be borne solely by the Authorized Participant.

Because orders to purchase baskets must be placed by 12:00 p.m., New York time, but the total payment required to create a basket during the continuous offering period will not be determined until after 4:00 p.m., New York time, on the date the purchase order is received, Authorized Participants will not know the total amount of the payment required to create a basket at the time they submit an irrevocable purchase order for the basket.

USL’s NAV and the total amount of the payment required to create a basket could rise or fall substantially between the time an irrevocable purchase order is submitted and the time the amount of the purchase price in respect thereof is determined.

Rejection of Purchase Orders

USCF acting by itself or through the Marketing

Agent shall have the absolute right but no obligation to reject a purchase order or a Creation Basket Deposit if:

it determines that the investment alternative available to USL at that time will not enable it

to meet its investment objective;

USCF acting by itself or through the Marketing Agent shall have the absolute right but no obligation to reject a purchase order or a Creation Basket Deposit if:

● it determines that the investment alternative available to USL at that time will not enable it to meet its investment objective;

● it determines that the purchase order or the Creation Basket Deposit is not in proper form;

it believes that the purchase order or the Creation Basket Deposit would have adverse tax consequences

to USL, the limited partners or its shareholders;

the acceptance or receipt of the Creation Basket Deposit would, in the opinion of counsel to USCF,

circumstances outside the control of USCF, Marketing Agent or Custodian make it, for all practical

purposes, not feasible to process creations of baskets.

None of USCF, the Marketing Agent or the

Custodian will be liable for the rejection of any purchase order or Creation Basket Deposit.

● it believes that the purchase order or the Creation Basket Deposit would have adverse tax consequences to USL, the limited partners or its shareholders;

● the acceptance or receipt of the Creation Basket Deposit would, in the opinion of counsel to USCF, be unlawful;

● circumstances outside the control of USCF, Marketing Agent or Custodian make it, for all practical purposes, not feasible to process creations of baskets.

None of USCF, the Marketing Agent or the Custodian will be liable for the rejection of any purchase order or Creation Basket Deposit.

Redemption Procedures

The procedures by which an Authorized Participant

can redeem one or more baskets mirror the procedures for the creation of baskets.

On any business day, an Authorized Participant

may place an order with the Marketing Agent to redeem one or more baskets.

The procedures by which an Authorized Participant can redeem one or more baskets mirror the procedures for the creation of baskets.

On any business day, an Authorized Participant may place an order with the Marketing Agent to redeem one or more baskets.

Redemption orders must be placed by 12:00 p.m.

time or the close of regular trading on the NYSE Arca, whichever is earlier.

A redemption order so received will be effective on

the date it is received in satisfactory form by the Marketing Agent (“Redemption Order Date”).

The redemption procedures

allow Authorized Participants to redeem baskets and do not entitle an individual shareholder to redeem any shares in an amount

less than a Redemption Basket, or to redeem baskets other than through an Authorized Participant.

By placing a redemption order, an Authorized

Participant agrees to deliver the baskets to be redeemed through DTC’s book-entry system to USL, as described below.

to the delivery of the redemption distribution for a redemption order, the Authorized Participant must also have wired to USL’s

account at the Custodian the non-refundable transaction fee due for the redemption order.

An Authorized Participant may not withdraw

a redemption order, except as otherwise set forth in the procedures in the Authorized Participant Agreement.

The manner by which redemptions are made

is dictated by the terms of the Authorized Participant Agreement.

By placing a redemption order, an Authorized Participant agrees

to (1) deliver the Redemption Basket to be redeemed through DTC’s book-entry system to USL’s account with the Custodian

not later than 3:00 p.m.

New York time on the second business day following the effective date of the redemption order (“Redemption

Distribution Date”), and (2) if required by USCF in its sole discretion, enter into or arrange for a block trade, an exchange

for physical or exchange for swap, or any other OTC energy transaction (through itself or a designated acceptable broker) with

USL for the sale of a number and type of futures contracts at the closing settlement price for such contracts on the Redemption

New York time or the close of regular trading on the NYSE Arca, whichever is earlier.

A redemption order so received will be effective on the date it is received in satisfactory form by the Marketing Agent (“Redemption Order Date”).

The redemption procedures allow Authorized Participants to redeem baskets and do not entitle an individual shareholder to redeem any shares in an amount less than a Redemption Basket, or to redeem baskets other than through an Authorized Participant.

By placing a redemption order, an Authorized Participant agrees to deliver the baskets to be redeemed through DTC’s book-entry system to USL, as described below.

Prior to the delivery of the redemption distribution for a redemption order, the Authorized Participant must also have wired to USL’s account at the Custodian the non-refundable transaction fee due for the redemption order.

An Authorized Participant may not withdraw a redemption order, except as otherwise set forth in the procedures in the Authorized Participant Agreement.

The manner by which redemptions are made is dictated by the terms of the Authorized Participant Agreement.

By placing a redemption order, an Authorized Participant agrees to (1) deliver the Redemption Basket to be redeemed through DTC’s

book-entry system to USL’s account with the Custodian not later than 3:00 p.m.

New York time on the second business day following the effective date of the redemption order (“Redemption Distribution Date”), and (2) if required by USCF in its sole discretion, enter into or arrange for a block trade, an exchange for physical or exchange for swap, or any other OTC energy transaction (through itself or a designated acceptable broker) with USL for the sale of a number and type of futures contracts at the closing settlement price for such contracts on the Redemption Order Date.

If an Authorized Participant fails to consummate (1) and (2) above, the order shall be cancelled.

The number and type

of contracts specified shall be determined by USCF, in its sole discretion, to meet USL’s investment objective and shall

be sold as a result of the Authorized Participant’s sale of shares.

The number and type of contracts specified shall be determined by USCF, in its sole discretion, to meet USL’s investment objective and shall be sold as a result of the Authorized Participant’s sale of shares.

Determination of Redemption Distribution

The redemption distribution from USL consists

of a transfer to the redeeming Authorized Participant of an amount of Treasuries and/or cash that is in the same proportion to

the total assets of USL (net of estimated accrued but unpaid fees, expenses and other liabilities) on the date the order to redeem

is properly received as the number of shares to be redeemed under the redemption order is in proportion to the total number of

shares outstanding on the date the order is received.

USCF, directly or in consultation with the Administrator, determines the

requirements for Treasuries and the amounts of cash, including the maximum permitted remaining maturity of a Treasury, and the

proportions of Treasuries and cash that may be included in distributions to redeem baskets.

The Marketing Agent will publish an

estimate of the redemption distribution per basket as of the beginning of each business day.

The redemption distribution from USL consists of a transfer to the redeeming Authorized Participant of an amount of Treasuries and/or cash that is in the same proportion to the total assets of USL (net of estimated accrued but unpaid fees, expenses and other liabilities) on the date the order to redeem is properly received as the number of shares to be redeemed under the redemption order is in proportion to the total number of shares outstanding on the date the order is received.

USCF, directly or in consultation with the Administrator, determines the requirements for Treasuries and the amounts of cash, including the maximum permitted remaining maturity of a Treasury, and the proportions of Treasuries and cash that may be included in distributions to redeem baskets.

The Marketing Agent will publish an estimate of the redemption distribution per basket as of the beginning of each business day.

Delivery of Redemption Distribution

The redemption distribution due from USL

will be delivered to the Authorized Participant by 3:00 p.m.

New York time on the second business day following the redemption

order date if, by 3:00 p.m.

New York time on such second business day, USL’s DTC account has been credited with the baskets

to be redeemed.

If USL’s DTC account has not been credited with all of the baskets to be redeemed by such time, the redemption

distribution will be delivered to the extent of whole baskets received.

Any remainder of the redemption distribution will be delivered

on the next business day to the extent of remaining whole baskets received if USL receives the fee applicable to the extension

of the redemption distribution date which USCF may, from time to time, determine and the remaining baskets to be redeemed are credited

to USL’s DTC account by 3:00 p.m.

The redemption distribution due from USL will be delivered to the Authorized Participant by 3:00 p.m.

New York time on the second business day following the redemption order date if, by 3:00 p.m.

New York time on such second business day, USL’s DTC account has been credited with the baskets to be redeemed.

If USL’s DTC account has not been credited with all of the baskets to be redeemed by such time, the redemption distribution will be delivered to the extent of whole baskets received.

Any remainder of the redemption distribution will be delivered on the next business day to the extent of remaining whole baskets received if USL receives the fee applicable to the extension of the redemption distribution date which USCF may, from time to time, determine and the remaining baskets to be redeemed are credited to USL’s DTC account by 3:00 p.m.

New York time on such next business day.

Any further outstanding amount of the redemption

order shall be cancelled.

Pursuant to information from USCF, the Custodian will also be authorized to deliver the redemption distribution

notwithstanding that the baskets to be redeemed are not credited to USL’s DTC account by 3:00 p.m.

New York time on the second

business day following the redemption order date if the Authorized Participant has collateralized its obligation to deliver the

baskets through DTC’s book entry-system on such terms as USCF may from time to time determine.

Suspension or Rejection of Redemption

USCF may, in its discretion, suspend the

right of redemption, or postpone the redemption settlement date, (1) for any period during which the NYSE Arca or the NYMEX is

closed other than customary weekend or holiday closings, or trading on the NYSE Arca or the NYMEX is suspended or restricted, (2)

for any period during which an emergency exists as a result of which delivery, disposal or evaluation of Treasuries is not reasonably

practicable, or (3) for such other period as USCF determines to be necessary for the protection of the limited partners or shareholders.

For example, USCF may determine that it is necessary to suspend redemptions to allow for the orderly liquidation of USL’s

assets at an appropriate value to fund a redemption.

If USCF has difficulty liquidating its positions, e.g., because of a market

disruption event in the futures markets, a suspension of trading by the exchange where the futures contracts are listed or an unanticipated

delay in the liquidation of a position in an OTC contract, it may be appropriate to suspend redemptions until such time as such

circumstances are rectified.

None of USCF, the Marketing Agent, the Administrator, or the Custodian will be liable to any person

or in any way for any loss or damages that may result from any such suspension or postponement.

Redemption orders must be made in whole

USCF will reject a redemption order if the order is not in proper form as described in the Authorized Participant Agreement

or if the fulfillment of the order, in the opinion of its counsel, might be unlawful.

USCF may also reject a redemption order if

the number of shares being redeemed would reduce the remaining outstanding shares to 100,000 shares (i.e., two baskets) or less.

Creation and Redemption Transaction

To compensate USL for its expenses in connection

with the creation and redemption of baskets, an Authorized Participant is required to pay a transaction fee to USL per order to

create or redeem baskets, regardless of the number of baskets in such order.

Authorized Participants pay USL a $350 transaction

fee for each order placed to create one or more Creation Baskets or to redeem one or more Redemption Baskets.

The transaction fee

may be reduced, increased or otherwise changed by USCF.

USCF shall notify DTC of any change in the transaction fee and will not

implement any increase in the fee for the redemption of baskets until 30 days after the date of the notice.

Any further outstanding amount of the redemption order shall be cancelled.

Pursuant to information from USCF, the Custodian will also be authorized to deliver the redemption distribution notwithstanding that the baskets to be redeemed are not credited to USL’s DTC account by 3:00 p.m.

New York time on the second business day following the redemption order date if the Authorized Participant has collateralized its obligation to deliver the baskets through DTC’s book entry-system on such terms as USCF may from time to time determine.

Suspension or Rejection of Redemption Orders

USCF may, in its discretion, suspend the right of redemption, or postpone the redemption settlement date, (1) for any period during which the NYSE Arca or the NYMEX is closed other than customary weekend or holiday closings, or trading on the NYSE Arca or the NYMEX is suspended or restricted, (2) for any period during which an emergency exists as a result of which delivery, disposal or evaluation of Treasuries is not reasonably practicable, or (3) for such other period as USCF determines to be necessary for the protection of the limited partners or shareholders.

For example, USCF may determine that it is necessary to suspend redemptions to allow for the orderly liquidation of USL’s assets at an appropriate value to fund a redemption.

If USCF has difficulty liquidating its positions, e.g., because of a market disruption event in the futures markets, a suspension of trading by the exchange where the futures contracts are listed or an unanticipated delay in the liquidation of a position in an OTC contract, it may be appropriate to suspend redemptions until such time as such circumstances are rectified.

None of USCF, the Marketing Agent, the Administrator, or the Custodian will be liable to any person or in any way for any loss or damages that may result from any such suspension or postponement.

Redemption orders must be made in whole baskets.

USCF will reject a redemption order if the order is not in proper form as described in the Authorized Participant Agreement or if the fulfillment of the order, in the opinion of its counsel, might be unlawful.

USCF may also reject a redemption order if the number of shares being redeemed would reduce the remaining

outstanding shares to 100,000 shares (i.e., two baskets) or less, unless USCF has reason to believe that the placer of the redemption order does in fact possess all the outstanding shares and can deliver them.

Creation and Redemption Transaction Fee

To compensate USL for its expenses in connection with the creation and redemption of baskets, an Authorized Participant is required to pay a transaction fee to USL of $350 per order to create or redeem baskets, regardless of the number of baskets in such order.

An order may include multiple baskets.

The transaction fee may be reduced, increased or otherwise changed by USCF.

USCF shall notify DTC of any change in the transaction fee and will not implement any increase in the fee for the redemption of baskets until thirty (30) days after the date of the notice.

Tax Responsibility

Authorized Participants are responsible

for any transfer tax, sales or use tax, stamp tax, recording tax, value added tax or similar tax or governmental charge applicable

to the creation or redemption of baskets, regardless of whether or not such tax or charge is imposed directly on the Authorized

Participant, and agree to indemnify USCF and USL if they are required by law to pay any such tax, together with any applicable

penalties, additions to tax and interest thereon.

Authorized Participants are responsible for any transfer tax, sales or use tax, stamp tax, recording tax, value added tax or similar tax or governmental charge applicable to the creation or redemption of baskets, regardless of whether or not such tax or charge is imposed directly on the Authorized Participant, and agree to indemnify USCF and USL if they are required by law to pay any such tax, together with any applicable penalties, additions to tax and interest thereon.

Secondary Market Transactions

As noted, USL creates and redeems shares

from time to time, but only in one or more Creation Baskets or Redemption Baskets.

The creation and redemption of baskets are only

made in exchange for delivery to USL or the distribution by USL of the amount of Treasuries and cash represented by the baskets

being created or redeemed, the amount of which will be based on the aggregate NAV of the number of shares included in the baskets

being created or redeemed determined on the day the order to create or redeem baskets is properly received.

As discussed above, Authorized Participants

are the only persons that may place orders to create and redeem baskets.

Authorized Participants must be registered broker-dealers

or other securities market participants, such as banks and other financial institutions that are not required to register as broker-dealers

to engage in securities transactions.

An Authorized Participant is under no obligation to create or redeem baskets, and an Authorized

Participant is under no obligation to offer to the public shares of any baskets it does create.

Authorized Participants that do

offer to the public shares from the baskets they create will do so at per-share offering prices that are expected to reflect, among

other factors, the trading price of the shares on the NYSE Arca, the per share NAV of USL at the time the Authorized Participant

purchased the Creation Baskets and the per share NAV of the shares at the time of the offer of the shares to the public, the supply

of and demand for shares at the time of sale, and the liquidity of the Oil Futures Contracts market and the market for Other Oil-Related

The prices of shares offered by Authorized Participants are expected to fall between USL’s per share NAV and

the trading price of the shares on the NYSE Arca at the time of sale.

Shares initially comprising the same basket but offered by

Authorized Participants to the public at different times may have different offering prices.

An order for one or more baskets may

be placed by an Authorized Participant on behalf of multiple clients.

Authorized Participants who make deposits with USL in exchange

for baskets receive no fees, commissions or other form of compensation or inducement of any kind from either USL or USCF, and no

such person has any obligation or responsibility to USCF or USL to effect any sale or resale of shares.

Shares trade in the secondary

market on the NYSE Arca.

Shares may trade in the secondary market at prices that are lower or higher relative to their per share

The amount of the discount or premium in the trading price relative to the per share NAV may be influenced by various factors,

including the number of investors who seek to purchase or sell shares in the secondary market and the liquidity of the Oil Futures

Contracts market and the market for Other Oil-Related Investments.

While the shares trade during the core trading session on the

NYSE Arca until 4:00 p.m.

New York time, liquidity in the market for Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments may

be reduced after the close of the NYMEX at 2:30 p.m.

As noted, USL creates and redeems shares from time to time, but only in one or more Creation Baskets or Redemption Baskets.

The creation and redemption of baskets are only made in exchange for delivery to USL or the distribution by USL of the amount of Treasuries and cash represented by the baskets being created or redeemed, the amount of which will be based on the aggregate NAV of the number of shares included in the baskets being created or redeemed determined on the day the order to create or redeem baskets is properly received.

As discussed above, Authorized Participants are the only persons that may place orders to create and redeem baskets.

Authorized Participants must be registered broker-dealers or other securities market participants, such as banks and other financial institutions that are not required to register as broker-dealers to engage in securities transactions.

An Authorized Participant is under no obligation to create or redeem baskets, and an Authorized Participant is under no obligation to offer to the public shares of any baskets it does create.

Authorized Participants that do offer to the public shares from the baskets they create will do so at per-share offering prices that are expected to reflect, among other factors, the trading price of the shares on the NYSE Arca, the NAV of USL at the time the Authorized Participant purchased the Creation Baskets and the NAV of the shares at the time of the offer of the shares to the public, the supply of and demand for shares at the time of sale, and the liquidity of the Oil Futures Contract market and the market for Other Oil-Related Investments.

The prices of shares offered by Authorized Participants are expected to fall between USL’s NAV and the trading price of the shares on the NYSE Arca at the time of sale.

Shares initially comprising the same basket but offered by Authorized Participants to the public at different times may have different offering prices.

An order for one or more baskets may be placed by an Authorized Participant on behalf of multiple clients.

Authorized Participants who make deposits with USL in exchange for baskets receive no fees, commissions or other forms of compensation or inducement of any kind from either USL or USCF, and no such person has any obligation or responsibility to USCF or USL to effect any sale or resale of shares.

Shares trade in the secondary market on the NYSE Arca.

Shares may trade in the secondary market at prices that are lower or higher relative to their NAV per share.

The amount of the discount or premium in the trading price relative to the NAV per share may be influenced by various factors, including, among other things, the number of investors who seek to purchase or sell shares in the secondary market and the liquidity of the Oil Futures Contracts market and the market for Other Oil-Related Investments.

While the shares trade during the core trading session on the NYSE Arca until 4:00 p.m.

New York time, liquidity in the market for Oil Interests may be reduced after the close of the NYMEX at 2:30 p.m.

New York time.

As a result, during this time, trading spreads, and the resulting

premium or discount, on the shares may widen.

USCF causes USL to transfer the proceeds

from the sale of Creation Baskets to the Custodian or other custodian for trading activities.

USCF will invest USL’s assets

in Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments and investments in Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents.

purchases an Oil Futures Contract and certain exchange-traded Other Oil-Related Investments, USL is required to deposit 5% to 30%

with the selling FCM on behalf of the exchange a portion of the value of the contract or other interest as security to ensure payment

for the obligation under Oil Interests at maturity.

As a result, during this time, particularly if USL has invested in Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments traded on the NYMEX, trading spreads, and the resulting premium or discount, on the shares may widen.

Use of Proceeds

USCF causes USL to transfer the proceeds from the sale of Creation Baskets to the Custodian or other custodian for trading activities.

USCF will invest USL’s assets in Oil-Interests and investments in Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents.

When USL purchases an Oil Futures Contracts and certain exchange-traded Other Oil-Related Investments, USL is required to deposit typically 5% to 30% with the selling FCMs on behalf of the exchange a portion of the value of the contract or other interest as security to ensure payment for the obligation under Crude Oil Interests at maturity.

This deposit is known as initial margin.

Counterparties in transactions in

OTC Oil Interests will generally impose similar collateral requirements on USL.

USCF will invest the assets that remain after margin

and collateral are posted in Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents subject to these margin and collateral requirements.

has sole authority to determine the percentage of assets that are:

held on deposit with the FCM or other custodian;

Counterparties in transactions in OTC contracts will generally impose similar collateral requirements on USL.

USCF will invest the assets that remain after margin and collateral are posted in Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents subject to these margin and collateral requirements.

USCF has sole authority to determine the percentage of assets that are:

● held on deposit with the FCMs or other custodian;

● used for other investments, and

● held in bank accounts to pay current obligations and as reserves.

Ongoing margin and collateral payments

will generally be required for both exchange-traded and OTC Oil Interests based on changes in the value of the Oil Interests.

ongoing collateral requirements with respect to OTC Oil Interests are negotiated by the parties, and may be affected by overall

market volatility, volatility of the underlying commodity or index, the ability of the counterparty to hedge its exposure under

an Oil Interest, and each party’s creditworthiness.

In light of the differing requirements for initial payments under exchange-traded

and OTC Oil Interests and the fluctuating nature of ongoing margin and collateral payments, it is not possible to estimate what

portion of USL’s assets will be posted as margin or collateral at any given time.

The Treasuries, cash and cash equivalents

held by USL will constitute reserves that will be available to meet ongoing margin and collateral requirements.

All interest income

will be used for USL’s benefit.

An FCM, counterparty, government agency

or commodity exchange could increase margin or collateral requirements applicable to USL to hold trading positions at any time.

Moreover, margin is merely a security deposit and has no bearing on the profit or loss potential for any positions held.

The assets of USL’s posted as margin

for Oil Futures Contracts are held in segregated accounts pursuant to the CEA and CFTC regulations.

If USL enters into a swap agreement, USL

must post both collateral and independent amounts to its swap counterparty(ies).

The amount of collateral USL posts changes according

to the amounts owed by USL to its counterparty on a given swap transaction, while independent amounts are fixed amounts posted

by USL at the start of a swap transaction.

Collateral and independent amounts posted to swap counterparties will be held by a third

party custodian.

Approximately 5% to 30% of USL's assets have normally been committed as margin for commodity futures contracts.

However, from time to time, the percentage of assets committed as margin may be substantially more, or less, than such range.

An FCM, counterparty, government agency or commodity exchange could increase margin or collateral requirements applicable to USL to hold trading positions at any time.

Ongoing margin and collateral payments will generally be required for both exchange-traded and OTC contracts based on changes in the value of the Crude Oil Interests.

Furthermore, ongoing collateral requirements with respect to OTC contracts are negotiated by the parties, and may be affected by overall market volatility, volatility of the underlying commodity or index, the ability of the counterparty to hedge its exposure under the Oil Interests, and each party’s creditworthiness.

Margin is merely a security deposit and has no bearing on the profit or loss potential for any positions held.

In light of the differing requirements for initial payments under exchange-traded and OTC contracts and the fluctuating nature of ongoing margin and collateral payments, it is not possible to estimate what portion of USL's assets will be posted as margin or collateral at any given time.

The Treasuries, cash and cash equivalents held by USL will constitute reserves that will be available to meet ongoing margin and collateral requirements.

All interest income will be used for USL's benefit.

USCF invests the balance of USL's assets not invested in Crude Oil Interests or held in margin as reserves to be available for changes in margin.

All interest income is used for USL's benefit.

The assets of USL posted as margin for Oil Futures Contracts are held in segregated accounts pursuant to the CEA and CFTC regulations.

If USL enters into a swap agreement, USL must post both collateral and independent amounts to its swap counterparties.

The amount of collateral USL posts changes according to the amounts owed by USL to its counterparty on a given swap transaction, while independent amounts are fixed amounts posted by USL at the start of a swap transaction.

Collateral and independent amounts posted to swap counterparties will be held by a third-party custodian.

The Commodity Interest Markets

The CEA governs the regulation of commodity

interest transactions, markets and intermediaries.

The CEA provides for varying degrees of regulation of commodity interest transactions

depending upon:

(1) the type of instrument being traded (e.g., contracts for future delivery, forwards, options, swaps or spot

contracts), (2) the type of commodity underlying the instrument (distinctions are made between instruments based on agricultural

commodities, energy and metals commodities and financial commodities), (3) the nature of the parties to the transaction (e.g.,

retail or eligible contract participant), (4) whether the transaction is entered into on a principal-to-principal or intermediated

basis, (5) the type of market on which the transaction occurs, and (6) whether the transaction is subject to clearing through a

clearing organization.

The offer and sale of shares of USL, as

well as shares of each Related Public Fund, is registered under the Securities Act.

USL and the Related Public Funds are subject

to the requirements of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations adopted thereunder as administered by

Firms’ participation in the distribution of shares is regulated as described above, as well as by the self-regulatory

association, FINRA.

The CEA governs the regulation of commodity interest transactions, markets and intermediaries.

The CEA provides for varying degrees of regulation of commodity interest transactions depending upon:

(1) the type of instrument being traded (e.g., contracts for future delivery, forwards, options, swaps or spot contracts), (2) the type of commodity underlying the instrument (distinctions are made between instruments based on agricultural commodities, energy and metals commodities and financial commodities), (3) the nature of the parties to the transaction (e.g., retail or eligible contract participant), (4) whether the transaction is entered into on a principal-to-principal or intermediated basis, (5) the type of market on which the transaction occurs, and (6) whether the transaction is subject to clearing through a clearing organization.

The offer and sale of shares of USL, as well as shares of each Related Public Fund, is registered under the 1933 Act.

USL and the Related Public Funds are subject to the requirements of the 1933 Act, the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations adopted thereunder as administered by the SEC.

Firms’ participation in the distribution of shares is regulated as described above, as well as by the self-regulatory association, FINRA.

Futures Contracts

A futures contract is a standardized contract

traded on, or subject to the rules of, an exchange that calls for the future delivery of a specified quantity and type of a commodity

at a specified time and place.

Futures contracts are traded on a wide variety of commodities, including agricultural products,

bonds, stock indices, interest rates, currencies, energy and metals.

The size and terms of futures contracts on a particular commodity

are identical and are not subject to any negotiation, other than with respect to price and the number of contracts traded between

the buyer and seller.

The contractual obligations of a buyer

or seller may generally be satisfied by taking or making physical delivery of the underlying commodity or by making an offsetting

sale or purchase of an identical futures contract on the same or linked exchange before the designated date of delivery.

The difference

between the price at which the futures contract is purchased or sold and the price paid for the offsetting sale or purchase, after

allowance for brokerage commissions, constitutes the profit or loss to the trader.

Some futures contracts, such as stock index

contracts, settle in cash (reflecting the difference between the contract purchase/sale price and the contract settlement price)

rather than by delivery of the underlying commodity.

In market terminology, a trader who purchases

a futures contract is long in the market and a trader who sells a futures contract is short in the market.

Before a trader closes

out his long or short position by an offsetting sale or purchase, his outstanding contracts are known as open trades or open positions.

A futures contract is a standardized contract traded on, or subject to the rules of, an exchange that calls for the future delivery of a specified quantity and type of a commodity at a specified time and place.

Futures contracts are traded on a wide variety of commodities, including agricultural products, bonds, stock indices, interest rates, currencies, energy and metals.

The size and terms of futures contracts on a particular commodity are identical and are not subject to any negotiation, other than with respect to price and the number of contracts traded between the buyer and seller.

The contractual obligations of a buyer or seller may generally be satisfied by taking or making physical delivery of the underlying commodity or by making an offsetting sale or purchase of an identical futures contract on the same or linked exchange before the designated date of delivery.

The difference between the price at which the futures contract is purchased or sold and the price paid for the offsetting sale or purchase, after allowance for brokerage commissions, constitutes the profit or loss to the trader.

Some futures contracts, such as stock index contracts, settle in cash (reflecting the difference between the contract purchase/sale price and the contract settlement price) rather than by delivery of the underlying commodity.

In market terminology, a trader who purchases a futures contract is long in the market and a trader who sells a futures contract is short in the market.

Before a trader closes out his long or short position by an offsetting sale or purchase, his outstanding contracts are known as open trades or open positions.

The aggregate amount of open positions held by traders in a particular contract is referred to as the open interest in such contract.

Forward Contracts

A forward contract is a contractual obligation

to purchase or sell a specified quantity of a commodity at or before a specified date in the future at a specified price and, therefore,

is economically similar to a futures contract.

Unlike futures contracts, however, forward contracts are typically traded in the

OTC markets and are not standardized contracts.

Forward contracts for a given commodity are generally available for various amounts

and maturities and are subject to individual negotiation between the parties involved.

Moreover, generally there is no direct means

of offsetting or closing out a forward contract by taking an offsetting position as one would a futures contract on a U.S.

If a trader desires to close out a forward contract position, he generally will establish an opposite position in the contract

but will settle and recognize the profit or loss on both positions simultaneously on the delivery date.

Thus, unlike in the futures

contract market where a trader who has offset positions will recognize profit or loss immediately, in the forward market a trader

with a position that has been offset at a profit will generally not receive such profit until the delivery date, and likewise a

trader with a position that has been offset at a loss will generally not have to pay money until the delivery date.

Nevertheless,

in some instances forward contracts now provide a right of offset or cash settlement as an alternative to making or taking delivery

of the underlying commodity.

In general, the CFTC does not regulate

the interbank and forward foreign currency markets with respect to transactions in contracts between certain sophisticated counterparties

such as USL or between certain regulated institutions and retail investors.

A forward contract is a contractual obligation to purchase or sell a specified quantity of a commodity at or before a specified date in the future at a specified price and, therefore, is economically similar to a futures contract.

Unlike futures contracts, however, forward contracts are typically traded in the OTC markets and are not standardized contracts.

Forward contracts for a given commodity are generally available for various amounts and maturities and are subject to individual negotiation between the parties involved.

Moreover, generally there is no direct means of offsetting or closing out a forward contract by taking an offsetting position as one would a futures contract on a U.S.

If a trader desires to close out a forward contract position, he generally will establish an opposite position in the contract but will settle and recognize the profit or loss on both positions simultaneously on the delivery date.

Thus, unlike in the futures contract market where a trader who has offset positions will recognize profit or loss immediately, in the forward market a trader with a position that has been offset at a profit will generally not receive such profit until the delivery date, and likewise a trader with a position that has been offset at a loss will generally not have to pay money until the delivery date.

Nevertheless, in some instances forward contracts now provide a right of offset or cash settlement as an alternative to making or taking delivery of the underlying commodity.

In general, the CFTC does not regulate the interbank and forward foreign currency markets with respect to transactions in contracts between certain sophisticated counterparties such as USL or between certain regulated institutions and retail investors.

Although U.S.

banks are regulated in various ways by

the Federal Reserve Board, the Comptroller of the Currency and other U.S.

federal and state banking officials, banking authorities

do not regulate the forward markets to the same extent that the swap markets are regulated by the CFTC and SEC.

Regulation exempts both foreign exchange

swaps and foreign exchange forwards from the definition of “swap” and, by extension, certain regulatory requirements

applicable to swaps (such as clearing and margin).

The exemption does not extend to other foreign exchange derivatives, such as

foreign exchange options, currency swaps, and non-deliverable forwards.

banks are regulated in various ways by the Federal Reserve Board, the Comptroller of the Currency and other U.S.

federal and state banking officials, banking authorities do not regulate the forward markets to the same extent that the swap markets are regulated by the CFTC and SEC.

Regulation exempts both foreign exchange swaps and foreign exchange forwards from the definition of “swap” and, by extension, certain regulatory requirements applicable to swaps (such as clearing and margin).

The exemption does not extend to other foreign exchange derivatives, such as foreign exchange options, currency swaps, and non-deliverable forwards.

While the U.S.

government does not currently

impose any restrictions on the movements of currencies, it could choose to do so.

The imposition or relaxation of exchange controls

in various jurisdictions could significantly affect the market for that and other jurisdictions’ currencies.

Trading in the

interbank market also exposes USL to a risk of default since failure of a bank with which USL had entered into a forward contract

would likely result in a default and thus possibly substantial losses to USL.

government does not currently impose any restrictions on the movements of currencies, it could choose to do so.

The imposition or relaxation of exchange controls in various jurisdictions could significantly affect the market for that and other jurisdictions’ currencies.

Trading in the interbank market also exposes USL to a risk of default since failure of a bank with which USL had entered into a forward contract would likely result in a default and thus possibly substantial losses to USL.

Options on Futures Contracts

Options on futures contracts are standardized

contracts traded on an exchange.

An option on a futures contract gives the buyer of the option the right, but not the obligation,

to take a position at a specified price (the striking, strike, or exercise price) in the underlying futures contract or underlying

The buyer of a call option acquires the right, but not the obligation, to purchase or take a long position in the underlying

interest, and the buyer of a put option acquires the right, but not the obligation, to sell or take a short position in the underlying

The seller, or writer, of an option is

obligated to take a position in the underlying interest at a specified price opposite to the option buyer if the option is exercised.

The seller of a call option must stand ready to take a short position in the underlying interest at the strike price if the buyer

should exercise the option.

The seller of a put option, on the other hand, must stand ready to take a long position in the underlying

interest at the strike price.

A call option is said to be in-the-money

if the strike price is below current market levels and out-of-the-money if the strike price is above current market levels.

a put option is said to be in-the-money if the strike price is above the current market levels and out-of-the-money if the strike

price is below current market levels.

Options have limited life spans, usually

tied to the delivery or settlement date of the underlying interest.

Some options, however, expire significantly in advance of such

The purchase price of an option is referred to as its premium, which consists of its intrinsic value (which is related to

the underlying market value) plus its time value.

As an option nears its expiration date, the time value shrinks and the market

and intrinsic values move into parity.

Options on futures contracts are standardized contracts traded on an exchange.

An option on a futures contract gives the buyer of the option the right, but not the obligation, to take a position at a specified price (the striking, strike, or exercise price) in the underlying futures contract or underlying interest.

The buyer of a call option acquires the right, but not the obligation, to purchase or take a long position in the underlying interest, and the buyer of a put option acquires the right, but not the obligation, to sell or take a short position in the underlying interest.

The seller, or writer, of an option is obligated to take a position in the underlying interest at a specified price opposite to the option buyer if the option is exercised.

The seller of a call option must stand ready to take a short position in the underlying interest at the strike price if the buyer should exercise the option.

The seller of a put option, on the other hand, must stand ready to take a long position in the underlying interest at the strike price.

A call option is said to be in-the-money if the strike price is below current market levels and out-of-the-money if the strike price is above current market levels.

Conversely, a put option is said to be in-the-money if the strike price is above the current market levels and out-of-the-money if the strike price is below current market levels.

Options have limited life spans, usually tied to the delivery or settlement date of the underlying interest.

Some options, however, expire significantly in advance of such date.

The purchase price of an option is referred to as its premium, which consists of its intrinsic value (which is related to the underlying market value) plus its time value.

As an option nears its expiration date, the time value shrinks and the market and intrinsic values move into parity.

An option that is out-of-the-money and not offset by the time it expires becomes worthless.

On certain exchanges, in-the-money options are automatically exercised on their expiration date, but on others unexercised options

simply become worthless after their expiration date.

Regardless of how much the market swings,

the most an option buyer can lose is the option premium.

The option buyer deposits his premium with his broker, and the money goes

to the option seller.

On certain exchanges, in-the-money options are automatically exercised on their expiration date, but on others unexercised options simply become worthless after their expiration date.

Regardless of how much the market swings, the most an option buyer can lose is the option premium.

The option buyer deposits his premium with his broker, and the money goes to the option seller.

Option sellers, on the other hand, face risks similar to participants in the futures markets.

since the seller of a call option is assigned a short futures position if the option is exercised, his risk is the same as someone

who initially sold a futures contract.

Because no one can predict exactly how the market will move, the option seller typically

posts margin to demonstrate his ability to meet any potential contractual obligations.

Options on Forward Contracts or Commodities

For example, since the seller of a call option is assigned a short futures position if the option is exercised, his risk is the same as someone who initially sold a futures contract.

Because no one can predict exactly how the market will move, the option seller typically posts margin to demonstrate his ability to meet any potential contractual obligations.

Options on Forward Contracts or Commodities

operate in a manner similar to options on futures contracts.

An option on a forward contract or commodity gives the buyer of the

option the right, but not the obligation, to take a position at a specified price in the underlying forward contract or commodity.

However, unlike options on futures contracts, options on forward contracts or on commodities are individually negotiated contracts

between counterparties and are typically traded in the OTC market.

Therefore, options on forward contracts and physical commodities

possess many of the same characteristics of forward contracts with respect to offsetting positions and credit risk that are described

Options on forward contracts or commodities operate in a manner similar to options on futures contracts.

An option on a forward contract or commodity gives the buyer of the option the right, but not the obligation, to take a position at a specified price in the underlying forward contract or commodity.

However, unlike options on futures contracts, options on forward contracts or on commodities are individually negotiated contracts between counterparties and are typically traded in the OTC market.

Therefore, options on forward contracts and physical commodities possess many of the same characteristics of forward contracts with respect to offsetting positions and credit risk that are described above.

Swap Contracts

Swap transactions generally involve contracts

between two parties to exchange a stream of payments computed by reference to a notional amount and the price of the asset that

is the subject of the swap.

Swap contracts are principally traded off-exchange, although certain swap contracts are also being

traded in electronic trading facilities and cleared through clearing organizations.

Swaps are usually entered into on a net

basis, that is, the two payment streams are netted out in a cash settlement on the payment date or dates specified in the agreement,

with the parties receiving or paying, as the case may be, only the net amount of the two payments.

Swaps do not generally involve

the delivery of underlying assets or principal.

Accordingly, the risk of loss with respect to swaps is generally limited to the

net amount of payments that the party is contractually obligated to make.

In some swap transactions one or both parties may require

collateral deposits from the counterparty to support that counterparty’s obligation under the swap agreement.

If the counterparty

to such a swap defaults, the risk of loss consists of the net amount of payments that the party is contractually entitled to receive

less any collateral deposits it is holding.

Some swap transactions are cleared through

central counterparties.

“Clearing” refers to the process by which a trade that is bilaterally executed by two parties

is submitted to a central clearing counterparty, via a clearing member (i.e., an FCM), and replaced by two mirror swaps, with the

central clearing counterparty becoming the counterparty to both of the initial parties to the swap.

These transactions, known as

cleared swaps, involve two counterparties first agreeing to the terms of a swap transaction, then submitting the transaction to

a clearing house that acts as the central counterparty.

Once accepted by the clearing house, the original swap transaction is terminated

and replaced by two mirror trades for which the central counterparty becomes the counterparty to each of the original parties based

upon the trade terms determined in the original transaction.

In this manner each individual swap counterparty reduces its risk

of loss due to counterparty nonperformance because the clearing house acts as the counterparty to each transaction.

Swap transactions generally involve contracts between two parties to exchange a stream of payments computed by reference to a notional amount and the price of the asset that is the subject of the swap.

Swap contracts are principally traded off-exchange, although certain swap contracts are also being traded in electronic trading facilities and cleared through clearing organizations.

Swaps are usually entered into on a net basis, that is, the two payment streams are netted out in a cash settlement on the payment date or dates specified in the agreement, with the parties receiving or paying, as the case may be, only the net amount of the two payments.

Swaps do not generally involve the delivery of underlying assets or principal.

Accordingly, the risk of loss with respect to swaps is generally limited to the net amount of payments that the party is contractually obligated to make.

In some swap transactions one or both parties may require collateral deposits from the counterparty to support that counterparty’s obligation under the swap agreement.

If the counterparty to such a swap defaults, the risk of

loss consists of the net amount of payments that the party is contractually entitled to receive less any collateral deposits it is holding.

Some swap transactions are cleared through central counterparties.

“Clearing” refers to the process by which a trade that is bilaterally executed by two parties is submitted to a central clearing counterparty, via a clearing member (i.e., an FCM), and replaced by two mirror swaps, with the central clearing counterparty becoming the counterparty to both of the initial parties to the swap.

These transactions, known as cleared swaps, involve two counterparties first agreeing to the terms of a swap transaction, then submitting the transaction to a clearing house that acts as the central counterparty.

Once accepted by the clearing house, the original swap transaction is terminated and replaced by two mirror trades for which the central counterparty becomes the counterparty to each of the original parties based upon the trade terms determined in the original transaction.

In this manner each individual swap counterparty reduces its risk of loss due to counterparty nonperformance because the clearing house acts as the counterparty to each transaction.

Commodities Regulation

Futures exchanges in the United States

are subject to varying degrees of regulation under the CEA depending on whether such exchange is a designated contract market,

exempt board of trade or electronic trading facility.

Clearing organizations are also subject to the CEA and the rules and regulations

adopted thereunder and administered by the CFTC.

The CFTC is the governmental agency charged with responsibility for regulation

of futures exchanges and commodity interest trading.

The CFTC’s function is to implement the CEA’s objectives of preventing

price manipulation and excessive speculation and promoting orderly and efficient commodity interest markets.

In addition, the various

exchanges and clearing organizations themselves exercise regulatory and supervisory authority over their member firms.

The CFTC also regulates the activities

of “commodity trading advisors” and “commodity pool operators” and the CFTC has adopted regulations with

respect to certain of such persons’ activities.

Pursuant to its authority, the CFTC requires a CPO, such as USCF, to keep

accurate, current and orderly records with respect to each pool it operates.

The CFTC may suspend, modify or terminate the registration

of any registrant for failure to comply with CFTC rules or regulations.

Suspension, restriction or termination of USCF’s

registration as a CPO would prevent it, until such time (if any) as such registration were to be reinstated, from managing, and

might result in the termination of, USL or the Related Public Funds.

Under certain circumstances, the CEA grants

shareholders the right to institute a reparations proceeding before the CFTC against USCF (as a registered commodity pool operator),

as well as those of their respective employees who are required to be registered under the CEA.

Shareholders may also be able to

maintain a private right of action for certain violations of the CEA.

Pursuant to authority in the CEA, the NFA

has been formed and registered with the CFTC as a registered futures association.

The NFA is the only self-regulatory association

for commodities professionals other than the exchanges.

As such, the NFA promulgates rules governing the conduct of commodity professionals

and disciplines those professionals that do not comply with such standards.

The CFTC has delegated to the NFA responsibility for

the registration of commodity pool operators.

Futures exchanges in the United States are subject to varying degrees of regulation under the CEA depending on whether such exchange is a designated contract market, exempt board of trade or electronic trading facility.

Clearing organizations are also subject to the CEA and the rules and regulations adopted thereunder and administered by the CFTC.

The CFTC is the governmental agency charged with responsibility for regulation of futures exchanges and commodity interest trading.

The CFTC’s function is to implement the CEA’s objectives of preventing price manipulation and excessive speculation and promoting orderly and efficient commodity interest markets.

In addition, the various exchanges and clearing organizations themselves exercise regulatory and supervisory authority over their member firms.

The CFTC also regulates the activities of “commodity trading advisors” and “commodity pool operators” and the CFTC has adopted regulations with respect to certain of such persons’ activities.

Pursuant to its authority, the CFTC requires a CPO, such as USCF, to keep accurate, current and orderly records with respect to each pool it operates.

The CFTC may suspend, modify or terminate the registration of any registrant for failure to comply with CFTC rules or regulations.

Suspension, restriction or termination of USCF’s registration as a CPO would prevent it, until such time (if any) as such registration were to be reinstated, from managing, and might result in the termination of, USL or the Related Public Funds.

Under certain circumstances, the CEA grants shareholders the right to institute a reparations proceeding before the CFTC against USCF (as a registered commodity pool operator), as well as those of their respective employees who are required to be registered under the CEA.

Shareholders may also be able to maintain a private right of action for certain violations of the CEA.

Pursuant to authority in the CEA, the NFA has been formed and registered with the CFTC as a registered futures association.

The NFA is the only self-regulatory association for commodities professionals other than the exchanges.

As such, the NFA promulgates rules governing the conduct of commodity professionals and disciplines those professionals that do not comply with such standards.

The CFTC has delegated to the NFA responsibility for the registration of commodity pool operators.

USCF is a member of the NFA.

As a member of the NFA, USCF is subject to NFA standards

relating to fair trade practices, financial condition, and consumer protection.

The CEA requires all FCMs, i.e.

clearing brokers, to meet and maintain specified fitness and financial requirements, to segregate customer funds from proprietary

funds and account separately for all customers’ funds and positions, and to maintain specified books and records open to

inspection by the staff of the CFTC.

The CFTC has similar authority over introducing brokers, or persons who solicit or accept

orders for commodity interest trades but who do not accept margin deposits for the execution of trades.

The CEA authorizes the

CFTC to regulate trading by FCMs and by their officers and directors, permits the CFTC to require action by exchanges in the event

of market emergencies, and establishes an administrative procedure under which customers may institute complaints for damages arising

from alleged violations of the CEA.

The regulations of the CFTC and the NFA

prohibit any representation by a person registered with the CFTC or by any member of the NFA, that registration with the CFTC,

or membership in the NFA, in any respect indicates that the CFTC or the NFA, as the case may be, has approved or endorsed that

person or that person’s trading program or objectives.

The registrations and memberships of the parties described in this

summary must not be considered as constituting any such approval or endorsement.

Likewise, no futures exchange has given or will

give any similar approval or endorsement.

CFTC regulations require enhanced customer

protections, risk management programs, internal monitoring and controls, capital and liquidity standards, customer disclosures

and auditing and examination programs for FCMs.

These regulations are intended to afford greater assurances to market participants

that customer segregated funds and secured amounts are protected, customers are provided with appropriate notice of the risks of

futures trading and of the FCMs with which they may choose to do business, FCMs are monitoring and managing risks in a robust manner,

the capital and liquidity of FCMs are strengthened to safeguard the continued operations and the auditing and examination programs

of the CFTC and the self-regulatory organizations are monitoring the activities of FCMs in a thorough manner.

USL’s investors are afforded prescribed

rights for reparations under the CEA against USCF (as a registered commodity pool operator), as well as its respective employees

who are required to be registered under the CEA.

Investors may also be able to maintain a private right of action for violations

The CFTC has adopted rules implementing the reparation provisions of the CEA, which provide that any person may file

a complaint for a reparations award with the CFTC for violation of the CEA against a floor broker or an FCM, introducing broker,

commodity trading advisor, CPO, and their respective associated persons.

The regulation of commodity interest trading

in the United States and other countries is an evolving area of the law.

Below are discussed several key regulatory items that

are relevant to USL.

The various statements made in this summary are subject to modification by legislative action and changes

in the rules and regulations of the CFTC, the NFA, the futures exchanges, clearing organizations and other regulatory bodies.

addition, with regard to any other rules that the CFTC or SEC may adopt in the future, the effect of any such regulatory changes

on USL is impossible to predict, but it could be substantial and adverse.

As a member of the NFA, USCF is subject to NFA standards relating to fair trade practices, financial condition, and consumer protection.

The CEA requires all FCMs, i.e., USL’s clearing brokers, to meet and maintain specified fitness and financial requirements, to segregate customer funds from proprietary funds and account separately for all customers’ funds and positions, and to maintain specified books and records open to inspection by the staff of the CFTC.

The CFTC has similar authority over introducing brokers, or persons who solicit or accept orders for commodity interest trades but who do not accept margin deposits for the execution of trades.

The CEA authorizes the CFTC to regulate trading by FCMs and by their officers and directors, permits the CFTC to require action by exchanges in the event of market emergencies, and establishes an administrative procedure under which customers may institute complaints for damages arising from alleged violations of the CEA.

The regulations of the CFTC and the NFA prohibit any representation by a person registered with the CFTC or by any member of the NFA, that registration with the CFTC, or membership in the NFA, in any respect indicates that the CFTC or the NFA, as the case may be, has approved or endorsed that person or that person’s trading program or objectives.

registrations and memberships of the parties described in this summary must not be considered as constituting any such approval or endorsement.

Likewise, no futures exchange has given or will give any similar approval or endorsement.

CFTC regulations require enhanced customer protections, risk management programs, internal monitoring and controls, capital and liquidity standards, customer disclosures and auditing and examination programs for FCMs.

These regulations are intended to afford greater assurances to market participants that customer segregated funds and secured amounts are protected, customers are provided with appropriate notice of the risks of futures trading and of the FCMs with which they may choose to do business, FCMs are monitoring and managing risks in a robust manner, the capital and liquidity of FCMs are strengthened to safeguard the continued operations, and the auditing and examination programs of the CFTC and the self-regulatory organizations are monitoring the activities of FCMs in a thorough manner.

USL’s investors are afforded prescribed rights for reparations under the CEA against USCF (as a registered commodity pool operator), as well as its respective employees who are required to be registered under the CEA.

Investors may also be able to maintain a private right of action for violations of the CEA.

The CFTC has adopted rules implementing the reparation provisions of the CEA, which provide that any person may file a complaint for a reparations award with the CFTC for violation of the CEA against a floor broker or an FCM, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, CPO, and their respective associated persons.

The regulation of commodity interest trading in the United States and other countries is an evolving area of the law.

Below are discussed several key regulatory items that are relevant to USL.

The various statements made in this summary are subject to modification by legislative action and changes in the rules and regulations of the CFTC, the NFA, the futures exchanges, clearing organizations and other regulatory bodies.

In addition, with regard to any other rules that the CFTC or SEC may adopt in the future, the effect of any such regulatory changes on USL is impossible to predict, but it could be substantial and adverse.

Futures Contracts and Position Limits

The CFTC is generally prohibited by statute

from regulating trading on non-U.S.

The CFTC is generally prohibited by statute from regulating trading on non-U.S.

futures exchanges and markets.

The CFTC, however, has adopted regulations relating to the marketing

The CFTC, however, has adopted regulations relating to the marketing of non-U.S.

futures contracts in the United States.

These regulations permit certain contracts on non-U.S.

exchanges to be offered

and sold in the United States.

As discussed above, the CFTC has proposed

to adopt limits on speculative positions in 25 physical commodity futures and option contracts as well as swaps that are economically

equivalent to such contracts in the agriculture, energy and metals markets.

The Position Limit Rules would, among other things:

identify which contracts are subject to speculative position limits;

set thresholds that restrict the size of speculative positions

that a person may hold in the spot month, other individual months, and all months combined;

create an exemption for positions that

constitute bona fide hedging transactions;

impose responsibilities on DCMs and SEFs to establish position limits or, in some cases,

position accountability rules;

and apply to both futures and swaps across four relevant venues:

OTC, DCMs, SEFs as well as certain

located platforms.

The CFTC’s first attempt at finalizing the Position Limit Rules, in 2011, was successfully challenged

by market participants in 2012 and, since then, the CFTC has re-proposed them and solicited comments from market participants multiple

At this time, it is unclear how the Position Limit Rules may affect USL, but the effect may be substantial and adverse.

By way of example, the Position Limit Rules may negatively impact the ability of USL to meet its investment objectives through

limits that may inhibit USCF’s ability to sell additional Creation Baskets of USL.

See "The Commodity Interest Markets-Commodities

Regulation"

in this annual report on Form 10-K for additional information.

Until such time as the Position Limit Rules

are adopted, the regulatory architecture in effect prior to the adoption of the Position Limit Rules will govern transactions in

commodities and related derivatives.

Under that system, the CFTC enforces federal limits on speculation in nine agricultural products

(e.g., corn, wheat and soy), while futures exchanges establish and enforce position limits and accountability levels for other

agricultural products and certain energy products (e.g., oil and natural gas).

As a result, USL may be limited with respect

to the size of its investments in any commodities subject to these limits.

Under existing and recently adopted CFTC

regulations, for the purpose of position limits, a market participant is generally required, subject to certain narrow exceptions,

to aggregate all positions for which that participant controls the trading decisions with all positions for which that participant

has a 10 percent or greater ownership interest in an account or position, as well as the positions of two or more persons acting

pursuant to an express or implied agreement or understanding with that participant.

The Aggregation Rules will also apply with

respect to the Position Limit Rules if and when such Position Limit Rules are adopted.

exchanges to be offered and sold in the United States.

On October 15, 2020, the CFTC approved the Position Limits Rule.The Position Limits Rule establishes federal position limits for 25 core referenced futures contracts (comprised of agricultural, energy and metals futures contracts), futures and options linked to the core referenced futures contracts, and swaps that are economically equivalent to the core referenced futures contracts.

The Position Limits Rule sets position limits for the spot month and non-spot month;

Further, the Position Limits Rule sets forth two alternative processes for pursuing an exemption for non-enumerated hedge positions.

The Benchmark Oil Futures Contract will be subject to position limits under the Position Limits Rule, and USL's trading does not qualify as an enumerated bona fide hedge.

Margin Requirements

Futures and Cleared Swaps

Original or initial margin is the minimum

amount of funds that must be deposited by a commodity interest trader with the trader’s broker to initiate and maintain an

open position in futures contracts.

Maintenance margin is the amount (generally less than the original margin) to which a trader’s

account may decline before he must deliver additional margin.

Original or initial margin is the minimum amount of funds that must be deposited by a commodity interest trader with the trader’s broker to initiate and maintain an open position in futures contracts.

Maintenance margin is the amount (generally less than the original margin) to which a trader’s account may decline before he must deliver additional margin.

A margin deposit is like a cash performance bond.

It helps assure

the trader’s performance of the futures contracts that he or she purchases or sells.

Futures contracts are customarily bought

and sold on initial margin that represents a very small percentage (ranging upward from 5%) of the aggregate purchase or sales

price of the contract.

Because of such low margin requirements, price fluctuations occurring in the futures markets may create

profits and losses that, in relation to the amount invested, are greater than are customary in other forms of investment or speculation.

As discussed below, adverse price changes in the futures contract may result in margin requirements that greatly exceed the initial

In addition, the amount of margin required in connection with a particular futures contract is set from time to time by

the exchange on which the contract is traded and may be modified from time to time by the exchange during the term of the contract.

Brokerage firms, such as USL’s clearing

brokers, carrying accounts for traders in commodity interest contracts may not accept lower, and generally require higher, amounts

of margin as a matter of policy to further protect themselves.

The clearing brokers require USL to make margin deposits equal to

exchange minimum levels for all commodity interest contracts.

This requirement may be altered from time to time in the clearing

brokers’ discretion.

Margin requirements are computed each day

by the relevant clearing organization and a trader’s clearing broker.

When the market value of a particular open commodity

interest position changes to a point where the margin on deposit does not satisfy maintenance margin requirements, a margin call

is made by the broker.

It helps assure the trader’s performance of the futures contracts that he or she purchases or sells.

Futures contracts are customarily bought and sold on initial margin that represents a very small percentage (ranging upward from 5%) of the aggregate purchase or sales price of the contract.

Because of such low margin requirements, price fluctuations occurring in the futures markets may create profits and losses that, in relation to the amount invested, are greater than are customary in other forms of investment or speculation.

As discussed below, adverse price changes in the futures contract may result in margin requirements that greatly exceed the initial margin.

In addition, the amount of margin required in connection with a particular futures contract is set from time to time by the exchange on which the contract is traded and may be modified from time to time by the exchange during the term of the contract.

Brokerage firms, such as USL’s clearing brokers, carrying accounts for traders in commodity interest contracts may not accept lower, and generally require higher, amounts of margin as a matter of policy to further protect themselves.

The clearing brokers require USL to make margin deposits equal to exchange minimum levels for all commodity interest contracts.

This requirement may be altered from time to time in the clearing brokers’ discretion.

Margin requirements are computed each day by the relevant clearing organization and a trader’s clearing broker.

When the market value of a particular open commodity interest position changes to a point where the margin on deposit does not satisfy maintenance margin requirements, a margin call is made by the broker.

With respect to trading by USL, USL (and not its investors personally) is subject to margin calls.

Finally, many major U.S.

exchanges have

passed certain cross margining arrangements involving procedures pursuant to which the futures and options positions held in an

account would, in the case of some accounts, be aggregated and margin requirements would be assessed on a portfolio basis, measuring

the total risk of the combined positions.

When a trader purchases an option, there

is no margin requirement;

exchanges have passed certain cross margining arrangements involving procedures pursuant to which the futures and options positions held in an account would, in the case of some accounts, be aggregated and margin requirements would be assessed on a portfolio basis, measuring the total risk of the combined positions.

When a trader purchases an option, there is no margin requirement;

however, the option premium must be paid in full.

When a trader sells an option, on the other hand, he

or she may be required to deposit margin in an amount determined by the margin requirements established for the underlying interest

and, in addition, an amount substantially equal to the current premium for the option.

The margin requirements imposed on the selling

of options, although adjusted to reflect the probability that out-of-the-money options will not be exercised, can in fact be higher

than those imposed in dealing in the futures markets directly.

Complicated margin requirements apply to spreads and conversions,

which are complex trading strategies in which a trader acquires a mixture of options positions and positions in the underlying

In October 2015, the Office of the Comptroller

of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the FDIC, the Farm Credit Administration, and the Federal

Housing Finance Agency (each an “Agency” and, collectively, the “Agencies”) jointly adopted final rules

to establish minimum margin and capital requirements for registered swap dealers, major swap participants, security-based swap

dealers, and major security-based swap participants (“Swap Entities”) that are subject to the jurisdiction of one of

the Agencies (such entities, “Covered Swap Entities”, and the joint final rules, the “Final Margin Rules”).

The Final Margin Rules will subject non-cleared

swaps and non-cleared security-based swaps between Covered Swap Entities and Swap Entities, and between Covered Swap Entities and

financial end users that have material swaps exposure (i.e., an average daily aggregate notional of $8 billion or more in non-cleared

swaps calculated in accordance with the Final Margin Rules), to a mandatory two-way minimum initial margin requirement.

amount of the initial margin required to be posted or collected would be either the amount calculated by the Covered Swap Entity

using a standardized schedule set forth as an appendix to the Final Margin Rules, which provides the gross initial margin (as a

percentage of total notional exposure) for certain asset classes, or an internal margin model of the Covered Swap Entity conforming

to the requirements of the Final Margin Rules that is approved by the Agency having jurisdiction over the particular Covered Swap

The Final Margin Rules specify the types of collateral that may be posted or collected as initial margin for non-cleared

swaps and non-cleared security-based swaps with financial end users (generally cash, certain government, government-sponsored enterprise

securities, certain liquid debt, certain equity securities, certain eligible publicly traded debt, and gold);

and sets forth haircuts

for certain collateral asset classes.

The Final Margin Rules require minimum

variation margin to be exchanged daily for non-cleared swaps and non-cleared security-based swaps between Covered Swap Entities

and Swap Entities and between Covered Swap Entities and all financial end-users (without regard to the swaps exposure of the particular

financial end-user).

The minimum variation margin amount is the daily mark-to-market change in the value of the swap to the Covered

Swap Entity, taking into account variation margin previously posted or collected.

For non-cleared swaps and security-based swaps

between Covered Swap Entities and financial end-users, variation margin may be posted or collected in cash or non-cash collateral

that is considered eligible for initial margin purposes.

Variation margin is not subject to segregation with an independent, third-party

custodian, and may, if permitted by contract, be rehypothecated.

The initial margin requirements of the

Final Margin Rules are being phased in over time, and the variation margin requirements of the Final Margin Rules are currently

When a trader sells an option, on the other hand, he or she may be required to deposit margin in an amount determined by the margin requirements established for the underlying interest and, in addition, an amount substantially equal to the current premium for the option.

The margin requirements imposed on the selling of options, although adjusted to reflect the probability that out-of-the-money options will not be exercised, can in fact be higher than those imposed in dealing in the futures markets directly.

Complicated margin requirements apply to spreads and conversions, which are complex trading strategies in which a trader acquires a mixture of options positions and positions in the underlying interest.

In October 2015, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the FDIC, the Farm Credit Administration, and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (each an “Agency” and, collectively, the “Agencies”) jointly adopted final rules to establish minimum margin and capital requirements for registered swap dealers, major swap participants, security-based swap dealers, and major security-based swap participants (“Swap

Entities”) that are subject to the jurisdiction of one of the Agencies (such entities, “Covered Swap Entities”, and the joint final rules, the “Final Margin Rules”).

The Final Margin Rules will subject non-cleared swaps and non-cleared security-based swaps between Covered Swap Entities and Swap Entities, and between Covered Swap Entities and financial end users that have material swaps exposure (i.e., an average daily aggregate notional of $8 billion or more in non-cleared swaps calculated in accordance with the Final Margin Rules), to a mandatory two-way minimum initial margin requirement.

The minimum amount of the initial margin required to be posted or collected would be either the amount calculated by the Covered Swap Entity using a standardized schedule set forth as an appendix to the Final Margin Rules, which provides the gross initial margin (as a percentage of total notional exposure) for certain asset classes, or an internal margin model of the Covered Swap Entity conforming to the requirements of the Final Margin Rules that is approved by the Agency having jurisdiction over the particular Covered Swap Entity.

The Final Margin Rules specify the types of collateral that may be posted or collected as initial margin for non-cleared swaps and non-cleared security-based swaps with financial end users (generally cash, certain government, government-sponsored enterprise securities, certain liquid debt, certain equity securities, certain eligible publicly traded debt, and gold);

and sets forth haircuts for certain collateral asset classes.

The Final Margin Rules require minimum variation margin to be exchanged daily for non-cleared swaps and non-cleared security-based swaps between Covered Swap Entities and Swap Entities and between Covered Swap Entities and all financial end-users (without regard to the swaps exposure of the particular financial end-user).

The minimum variation margin amount is the daily mark-to-market change in the value of the swap to the Covered Swap Entity, taking into account variation margin previously posted or collected.

For non-cleared swaps and security-based swaps between Covered Swap Entities and financial end-users, variation margin may be posted or collected in cash or non-cash collateral that is considered eligible for initial margin purposes.

Variation margin is not subject to segregation with an independent, third-party custodian, and may, if permitted by contract, be rehypothecated.

The initial margin requirements of the Final Margin Rules are being phased in over time, and the variation margin requirements of the Final Margin Rules are currently in effect.

USL is not a Covered Swap Entity under the Final Margin Rules but it is a financial end-user.

Accordingly, USL is currently

subject to the variation margin requirements of the Final Margin Rules.

However, USL does not have material swaps exposure and,

accordingly, USL will not be subject to the initial margin requirements of the Final Margin Rules.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer

Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) required the CFTC and the SEC to adopt their own margin rules to apply to a limited

number of registered swap dealers, security-based swap dealers, major swap participants, and major security-based swap participants

that are not subject to the jurisdiction of one of the Agencies.

On December 16, 2015 the CFTC finalized its margin rules, which

are substantially the same as the Final Margin Rules and have the same implementation timeline.

The SEC adopted margin rules for

security-based swap dealers and major security-based swap participants on June 21, 2019.

The SEC’s margin rules are generally

aligned with the Final Margin Rules and the CFTC’s margin rules, but they differ in a few key respects relating to timing

for compliance and the manner in which initial margin must be segregated.

USL does not currently engage in security-based swap

transactions and, therefore, the SEC’s margin rules are not expected to apply to USL.

Mandatory Trading and Clearing of

CFTC regulations require that certain swap

transactions be executed on organized exchanges or “swap execution facilities” and cleared through regulated clearing

organizations (“derivative clearing organizations” (“DCOs”)), if the CFTC mandates the central clearing

of a particular class of swap and such swap is “made available to trade” on a swap execution facility.

Currently, swap

dealers, major swap participants, commodity pools, certain private funds and entities predominantly engaged in activities that

are financial in nature are required to execute on a swap execution facility, and clear, certain interest rate swaps and index-based

credit default swaps.

As a result, if USL enters into an interest rate or index-based credit default swap that is subject to these

requirements, such swap will be required to be executed on a swap execution facility and centrally cleared.

Mandatory clearing

and “made available to trade” determinations with respect to additional types of swaps are expected in the future,

and, when finalized, could require USL to electronically execute and centrally clear certain OTC instruments presently entered

into and settled on a bi-lateral basis.

If a swap is required to be cleared, initial and variation margin requirements are set

by the relevant clearing organization, subject to certain regulatory requirements and guidelines.

Additional margin may be required

and held by USL’s FCM.

Accordingly, USL is currently subject to the variation margin requirements of the Final Margin Rules.

However, USL does not have material swaps exposure and, accordingly, USL will not be subject to the initial margin requirements of the Final Margin Rules.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) required the CFTC and the SEC to adopt their own margin rules to apply to a limited number of registered swap dealers, security-based swap dealers, major swap participants, and major security-based swap participants that are not subject to the jurisdiction of one of the Agencies.

On December 16, 2015 the CFTC finalized its margin rules, which are substantially the same as the Final Margin Rules and have the same implementation timeline.

The SEC adopted margin rules for security-based swap dealers and major security-based swap participants on June 21, 2019.

The SEC’s margin rules are generally aligned with the Final Margin Rules and the CFTC’s margin rules, but they differ in a few key respects relating to timing for compliance and the manner in which initial margin must be segregated.

USL does not currently engage in security-based swap transactions and, therefore, the SEC’s margin rules are not expected to apply to USL.

Mandatory Trading and Clearing of Swaps

CFTC regulations require that certain swap transactions be executed on organized exchanges or “swap execution facilities” and cleared through regulated clearing organizations (“derivative clearing organizations” (“DCOs”)), if the CFTC mandates the central clearing of a particular class of swap and such swap is “made available to trade” on a swap execution facility.

Currently, swap dealers, major swap participants, commodity pools, certain private funds and entities predominantly engaged in activities that are financial in nature are required to execute on a swap execution facility, and clear, certain interest rate swaps and index-based credit default swaps.

As a result, if USL enters into an interest rate or index-based credit default swap that is subject to these requirements, such swap will be required to be executed on a swap execution facility and centrally cleared.

Mandatory clearing and “made available to trade” determinations with respect to additional types of swaps are expected in the future, and, when finalized, could require USL to electronically execute and centrally clear certain OTC instruments presently entered into and settled on a bi-lateral basis.

If a swap is required to be

cleared, initial and variation margin requirements are set by the relevant clearing organization, subject to certain regulatory requirements and guidelines.

Additional margin may be required and held by USL’s FCMs.

Other Requirements for Swaps

In addition to the margin requirements

described above, swaps that are not required to be cleared and executed on a SEF but that are executed bilaterally are also subject

to various requirements pursuant to CFTC regulations, including, among other things, reporting and recordkeeping requirements and,

depending on the status of the counterparties, trading documentation requirements and dispute resolution requirements.

In addition to the margin requirements described above, swaps that are not required to be cleared and executed on a SEF but that are executed bilaterally are also subject to various requirements pursuant to CFTC regulations, including, among other things, reporting and recordkeeping requirements and, depending on the status of the counterparties, trading documentation requirements and dispute resolution requirements.

Derivatives Regulations in Non-U.S.

1 unchanged sentence

In addition to U.S.

laws and regulations, USL

may be subject to non-U.S.

laws and regulations, USL may be subject to non-U.S.

derivatives laws and regulations if it engages in futures and/or swap transactions with non-U.S.

For example, USL may be impacted by European laws and regulations to the extent that it engages in futures transactions on

European exchanges or derivatives transactions with European entities.

Other jurisdictions impose requirements applicable to futures

and derivatives that are similar to those imposed by the U.S., including position limits, margin, clearing and trade execution

requirements.

USL makes available, free of charge, on

its website, its annual reports on Form 10-K, its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, its current reports on Form 8-K and amendments

to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after

these forms are filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.

For example, USL may be impacted by European laws and regulations to the extent that it engages in futures transactions on European exchanges or derivatives transactions with European entities.

Other jurisdictions impose requirements applicable to futures and derivatives that are similar to those imposed by the U.S., including position limits, margin, clearing and trade execution requirements.

USL makes available, free of charge, on its website, its annual reports on Form 10-K, its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, its current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after these forms are filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.

These reports are also available from the SEC through its website at:

USL also makes available its monthly reports

and its annual reports required to be prepared and filed with the NFA under the CFTC regulations.

USL also makes available its monthly reports and its annual reports required to be prepared and filed with the NFA under the CFTC regulations.

Intellectual Property

USCF owns trademark registrations for UNITED

STATES 12 MONTH OIL FUND (U.S.

3600671) for “Investment services in the field of oil futures contracts and other

oil-related investments,” in use since December 6, 2007, and 12 USL UNITED STATES 12 MONTH OIL FUND, LP (and 12 and Flame

Design) (U.S.

4440927) for “Financial investment services in the field of oil futures contracts, cash-settled options

on oil futures contracts, forward contracts for oil over-the-counter transactions based on the price of oil, and indices based

on the foregoing” in use since September 30, 2012.

USCF relies upon these trademarks through which it markets its services

and strives to build and maintain brand recognition in the market and among current and potential investors.

So long as USCF continues

to use these trademarks to identify its services, without challenge from any third party, and properly maintains and renews the

trademark registrations under applicable laws, rules and regulations, it will continue to have indefinite protection for these

trademarks under current laws, rules and regulations.

USCF owns trademark registrations for USCF

(and Design) (U.S.

USCF owns trademark registrations for UNITED STATES 12 MONTH OIL FUND (U.S.

3600671) for “Investment services in the field of oil futures contracts and other oil-related investments,” in use since December 6, 2007, and 12 USL UNITED STATES 12 MONTH OIL FUND, LP (and 12 and Flame Design) (U.S.

4440927) for “Financial investment services in the field of oil futures contracts, cash-settled options on oil futures contracts, forward contracts for oil over-the-counter transactions based on the price of oil, and indices based on the foregoing” in use since September 30, 2012.

USCF relies upon these trademarks through which it markets its services and strives to build and maintain brand recognition in the market and among current and potential investors.

So long as USCF continues to use these trademarks to identify its services, without challenge from any third party, and properly maintains and renews the trademark registrations under applicable laws, rules and regulations, it will continue to have indefinite protection for these trademarks under current laws, rules and regulations.

USCF owns trademark registrations for USCF (and Design) (U.S.

5127374) for “Fund investment services,” in use since April 10, 2016, USCF (U.S.

1 unchanged sentence

5450808) for “Fund investment services,” in use since April 2016.

USCF relies upon these trademarks and service mark

through which it markets its services and strives to build and maintain brand recognition in the market and among current and potential

So long as USCF continues to use these trademarks to identify its services, without challenge from any third party,

and properly maintains and renews the trademark registrations under applicable laws, rules and regulations;

it will continue to

have indefinite protection for these trademarks under current laws, rules and regulations.

USCF relies upon these trademarks and service mark through which it markets its services and strives to build and maintain brand recognition in the market and among current and potential investors.

it will continue to have indefinite protection for these trademarks under current laws, rules and regulations.

USCF has been granted two patents Nos.

1 unchanged sentence

Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.

What changed 10-K

Item 1. Business