Legal Proceedings.
−Removed: In 2014, Avra Surgical Robotics, Inc., a Delaware
−Removed: corporation (“ Avra Surgical ”), of which Barry F.
−Removed: Cohen, our Chief Operating Officer – Americas and a director,
−Removed: was Chief Executive Officer, a director and a principal stockholder, got into a dispute with the law firm of Quinn Emmanuel Urquhart &
−Removed: Sullivan LLP (“ Quinn Emmanuel ”) over legal fees allegedly due Quinn Emmanuel.
−Removed: Avra Surgical, which was seeking to develop
−Removed: a robotic surgery system using certain technology developed in Germany by then had ceased operations.
−Removed: These events occurred prior to the
−Removed: formation of the Company as Avra Medical Robotics, Inc.
−Removed: Other than the facts that both Avra Surgical and our Company shared the Avra name
−Removed: Cohen was an officer, director and principal stockholder of both companies, there was no relationship between the two companies.
−Removed: On May 26, 2020, Quinn Emmanuel filed a petition
−Removed: in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County against Avra Surgical, the Company (then known as Avra Medical Robotics,
−Removed: Inc.), Barry F.
−Removed: Cohen, Jared B.
−Removed: Stamell, an attorney affiliated with Avra Surgical and various individuals who at that time were or had
−Removed: been affiliated with Avra Surgical and or the Company (collectively, “ Respondents ”).
−Removed: The petition sought to recover
−Removed: the legal fees from the Respondents on the basis that they were “alter egos” of Avra Surgical.
−Removed: Other than the commonality
−Removed: of the Avra name and Mr.
−Removed: Cohen having been an officer, director and principal stockholder of both companies, there was no relationship
−Removed: between the two companies.
−Removed: As the Company and Mr.
−Removed: Cohen never received notice
−Removed: of filing of the petition or of subsequent proceedings (although Quinn Emmanuel filed affidavits with the Court stating that they had
−Removed: been duly served), neither the Company nor Mr.
−Removed: Cohen entered an appearance in the matter.
−Removed: The Company recently learned from a third party
−Removed: that in November 2020, the Court had rendered a decision holding that the Company and Messrs.
−Removed: Cohen and Stamell were “alter egos”
−Removed: of Avra Surgical and therefore were liable for payment of the Quinn Emmanuel legal fees.
−Removed: In addition, the Company also recently learned
−Removed: that in December 2023, the Court ordered the entry of a judgment against Avra Surgical, the Company and Messrs.
−Removed: Cohen and Stamell in the
−Removed: amount of $296,000 plus interest from November 2020.
−Removed: The Company is currently evaluating its legal
−Removed: options with respect to the matter.
−Removed: Notwithstanding the foregoing, Mr.
−Removed: Cohen and the Company have entered into an Indemnification Agreement,
−Removed: pursuant to which Mr.
−Removed: Cohen has agreed to fully indemnify the Company for any damages and costs (including legal fees) it incurs in connection
−Removed: with the action.
−Removed: Other than the foregoing, there are no legal proceedings
−Removed: currently pending or threatened against us.
−Removed: However, from time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings
−Removed: which arise in the ordinary course of business.
−Removed: Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in any such matter
−Removed: may harm our business.
+Added: In April 2024, an ex-shareholder of Otto Pvt
+Added: Ltd., an indirect wholly owned Bahamian subsidiary of SSi(“Otto”) commenced litigation in the Bahamas, seeking legal confirmation
+Added: that it holds 9,000 shares (approximately a 9% interest) in Otto.
+Added: The litigation, in which Otto is one of the defendants, relates to
+Added: a purported transaction in 2021, at which time Dr.
+Added: Sudhir Srivastava, the Company’s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and principal
+Added: shareholder, was the sole shareholder of Otto.
+Added: The plaintiff in the litigation alleges that at that time, it acquired the 9,000 Otto
+Added: shares from Dr.
+Added: However, as the plaintiff failed to pay the agreed upon consideration for the shares, in July 2022, the shareholding
+Added: was cancelled.
+Added: Srivastava along with Otto, has recently filed an action in the Bahamas to confirm the cancellation of the shares
+Added: and reconfirm their ownership and both actions are pending in the Bahamian courts.
+Added: The Bahamian court has issued an interim order to
+Added: maintain the status quo as it stands today with respect to the 9,000 Otto shares at the center of the dispute, as well as Otto’s
+Added: shareholdings in Sudhir Srivastava Innovations Pvt Ltd.
+Added: (“SSI-India”), our Indian operating subsidiary and SSI-India’s
+Added: assets during the pendency of the litigation.
+Added: Based on legal opinions obtained from counsel, the Company believes that there will be
+Added: a favorable outcome in this case.
+Added: Notwithstanding the foregoing, Dr.
+Added: and the Company have entered into an Indemnification Agreement on October 12, 2024, pursuant to which Dr.
+Added: Srivastava has agreed to fully
+Added: indemnify the Company for any claims, damages and costs (including legal fees) which it incurs in connection with this litigation or in
+Added: relation to any of his ventures prior to consummation of the Company’s acquisition by merger of CardioVentures, Inc.
+Added: in April 2023.
Mine Safety Disclosures.
1 unchanged sentence
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.