−Removed: September 17, 2014, we learned that our company, along with a number of additional defendants, was the subject of a notice of
−Removed: civil claim (the Claim) filed in the Supreme Court of British Columbia by Wundr Software Inc.
−Removed: an eBook software developer.
−Removed: Wundr and our company were formerly parties to a binding letter of intent that was announced on November
−Removed: 12, 2013 (the Wundr LOI), pursuant to which we proposed to acquire 100% of the outstanding shares of Wundr.
−Removed: 10, 2014, we reported that the Wundr LOI had expired.
−Removed: other things, the Claim alleges that we committed the tort of intentional interference with economic or contractual relations
−Removed: by virtue of our role in an alleged scheme to establish a competing business to Wundr, and that we, through our agents, breached
−Removed: the terms of the Wundr LOI by appropriating certain confidential information and intellectual property of Wundr for the purpose
−Removed: of establishing a competing business.
+Added: Legal Proceedings
+Added: On September 17, 2014, we learned that our company, along with a number of additional defendants, was the subject of a notice of civil claim (the “Claim”) filed in the Supreme Court of British Columbia by Wundr Software Inc.
+Added: (“Wundr”), an eBook software developer.
+Added: Wundr and our company were formerly parties to a binding letter of intent that was announced on November 12, 2013 (the “Wundr LOI”), pursuant to which we proposed to acquire 100% of the outstanding shares of Wundr.
+Added: On January 10, 2014, we reported that the Wundr LOI had expired.
+Added: Among other things, the Claim alleges that we committed the tort of intentional interference with economic or contractual relations by virtue of our role in an alleged scheme to establish a competing business to Wundr, and that we, through our agents, breached the terms of the Wundr LOI by appropriating certain confidential information and intellectual property of Wundr for the purpose of establishing a competing business.
The Claim also alleges that we are vicariously liable for the actions of our agents.
−Removed: is seeking general damages from our company as well as damages for conspiracy to cause economic harm.
−Removed: None of the allegations
−Removed: contained in the Claim have been proven in court, which we believe are without merit, and we therefore intend to vigorously defend
−Removed: our position against Wundr.
−Removed: than as described above, we are not aware of any material pending legal proceedings to which it is a party or of which the Property
−Removed: is the subject.
−Removed: We also know of no proceedings to which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial
−Removed: holders of more than 5% of any class of our securities, or any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate or security
−Removed: holder are an adverse party or have a material interest adverse to our company.
−Removed: Safety Disclosures
+Added: Wundr is seeking general damages from our company as well as damages for conspiracy to cause economic harm.
+Added: None of the allegations contained in the Claim have been proven in court, which we believe are without merit, and we therefore intend to vigorously defend our position against Wundr.
+Added: Other than as described above, we are not aware of any material pending legal proceedings to which it is a party or of which the Property is the subject.
+Added: We also know of no proceedings to which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial holders of more than 5% of any class of our securities, or any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate or security holder are an adverse party or have a material interest adverse to our company.
+Added: Mine Safety Disclosures
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.