What changed in this filing

/stocks — the workspaceLOADING

Item 1A. Risk Factors

2025-08-14 compared with 2025-05-15 · 37 added, 31 removed, 18 unchanged (79% of the section changed)

13 unchanged sentences

which could negatively impact the Company’s liquidity and working capital.

of March 31, 2025, the Vivos Group’s outstanding Notes Receivable obligation was $5,973.

However, the composition of Vivos Group

assets available to settle this obligation remains uncertain.

Management anticipates that common stock will be used to satisfy the initial

portion of the overall liability.

With awarded legal fees and the fraud award of $1,000, the total liability as of March 31, 2025, was

Federal agency budget reviews and directives,

including those issued by the Department of Government Efficiency (“DOGE”), may adversely impact our business.

A portion of our revenue is derived from contracts

of June 30, 2025, the Vivos Group’s outstanding Notes Receivable obligation was $6,100.

However, the composition of Vivos

Group assets available to settle this obligation remains uncertain.

Management anticipates that common stock will be used to satisfy

the initial portion of the overall liability.

With awarded legal fees and the fraud award of $1,000, the total liability as of June

30, 2025 was $8,490.

agency budget reviews and directives, including those issued by the Department of Government Efficiency (“DOGE”), may adversely

impact our business.

portion of our revenue is derived from contracts with U.S.

federal government agencies.

Periodic budget reviews, cost-cutting mandates, or efficiency directives, such as those issued

by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), can lead to reductions or reallocations in client spending, even if such actions are

not formally disclosed to us.

Although unconfirmed, we believe a reduction in media-related staffing and spending by one federal agency client in 2025 may have been influenced

by DOGE’s identification of those services as non-essential.

While the potential revenue impact from this specific instance is not

material, the broader implementation of similar directives across federal agencies could materially reduce demand for our services in

the public sector.

Moreover, the lack of transparency surrounding these decisions increases the difficulty of forecasting and strategic

planning within this client segment.

Our business may be indirectly affected by the

imposition of tariffs or other trade restrictions that impact our clients’ operations and profitability.

While our core operations are not directly exposed

to international trade or tariff risk, a significant portion of our revenue is derived from media services provided to clients across

various industries, some of which rely on global supply chains or imported goods.

The imposition or escalation of tariffs, trade barriers,

or similar regulatory actions, particularly those affecting cost of goods sold for our clients, may reduce their gross margins and overall

profitability.

In response, clients may reduce discretionary expenditures, including advertising and media budgets, which could negatively

impact our revenues and financial performance.

Even perceived uncertainty around future trade policy could lead to more conservative client

behavior, affecting campaign timing, spend, or scope.

Periodic budget reviews, cost-cutting mandates,

or efficiency directives, such as those issued by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), can lead to reductions or reallocations

in client spending, even if such actions are not formally disclosed to us.

Although unconfirmed, we believe a reduction in media-related

staffing and spending by one federal agency client in 2025 may have been influenced by DOGE’s identification of those services

as non-essential.

While the potential revenue impact from this specific instance is not material, the broader implementation of similar

directives across federal agencies could materially reduce demand for our services in the public sector.

Moreover, the lack of transparency

surrounding these decisions increases the difficulty of forecasting and strategic planning within this client segment.

business may be indirectly affected by the imposition of tariffs or other trade restrictions that impact our clients’ operations

and profitability.

our core operations are not directly exposed to international trade or tariff risk, a significant portion of our revenue is derived from

media services provided to clients across various industries, some of which rely on global supply chains or imported goods.

The imposition

or escalation of tariffs, trade barriers, or similar regulatory actions, particularly those affecting cost of goods sold for our clients,

may reduce their gross margins and overall profitability.

In response, clients may reduce discretionary expenditures, including advertising

and media budgets, which could negatively impact our revenues and financial performance.

Even perceived uncertainty around future trade

policy could lead to more conservative client behavior, affecting campaign timing, spend, or scope.

business may be impacted by reductions in federal funding to client programs.

of our clients receive federal funding to support their operations.

We have already experienced one instance in which a client significantly

reduced media spend following the cessation of federal funds.

Continued or expanded cuts in federal funding may similarly affect other

client budgets and, in turn, our revenue.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

2 unchanged sentences

Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.

What changed 10-Q

Item 1A. Risk Factors