2 unchanged sentences
federal government.
−Removed: In addition, we are from time to time involved in legal proceedings and investigations arising in the ordinary course of business, including those relating to employment matters, relationships with clients and contractors, intellectual property disputes, environmental matters and other business matters.
+Added: In addition, we are from time to time involved in legal proceedings and investigations arising in the ordinary course of business, including those relating to
+Added: employment matters, relationships with clients and contractors, intellectual property disputes, environmental matters and other business matters.
Although the outcome of any such matter is inherently uncertain and may be materially adverse, based on current information, except as noted below, we believe there are no pending lawsuits or claims that may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
−Removed: On or about March 1, 2017, the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board, or the JPB, filed a lawsuit against Parsons Transportation Group, Inc., or PTG, in the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo, in connection with a positive train control project on which PTG was engaged prior to termination of its contract by the JPB.
−Removed: PTG had previously filed a lawsuit against the JPB for breach of contract and wrongful termination.
−Removed: The JPB seeks damages in excess of $100.0 million, which we are currently disputing.
−Removed: In addition to filing our complaint for breach of contract and wrongful termination, we have denied the allegations raised by the JPB and, accordingly, filed affirmative defenses.
−Removed: We are currently defending against the JPB’s claims and the parties are still engaged in discovery.
−Removed: We also have a professional liability insurance policy to the extent the JPB proves any errors or omissions occurred.
−Removed: At this time, it is too soon to determine the outcome of the litigation or assess the potential range of exposure, if any.
−Removed: We have also filed a third-party claim against a subcontractor for indemnification in connection with this matter.
In September 2015, a former Parsons employee filed an action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama against us as a qui tam relator on behalf of the United States (the “Relator”) alleging violation of the False Claims Act.
2 unchanged sentences
The United States government did not intervene in this matter as it is allowed to do so under the statute.
−Removed: We filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit on the grounds that the Relator did not meet the applicable statute of limitations.
−Removed: The District Court granted our motion to dismiss.
−Removed: The Relator’s attorney appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals of the Eleventh Circuit, which ultimately ruled in favor of the Relator, and we petitioned the United States Supreme Court to review the decision.
−Removed: The Supreme Court upheld the Appellate Court ruling and remanded the case to the District Court.
−Removed: The parties are engaged in limited discovery and Parsons has filed a renewed motion to dismiss the case.
−Removed: On or about October 4, 2019, LBH Engineers, LLC (“LBH”) filed a lawsuit against Parsons, PTG, and various other parties in the US District Court of for the Northern District of Georgia, in connection with an alleged infringement of LBH’s patent.
−Removed: LBH seeks damages and costs incurred by LBH, a post-judgment royalty, treble damages if the infringement is found to be willful, among other damages, which the Company and the other defendants are currently disputing.
+Added: The parties are currently engaged in discovery.
At this time, the Company is unable to determine the probability of the outcome of the litigation or determine a potential range of loss, if any.
2 unchanged sentences
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.