17 unchanged sentences
We are appealing the decision in the second IPR to the U.S.
−Removed: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
+Added: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which has scheduled a hearing for December 7, 2023.
On August 19, 2020, the court ordered a stay of the PGI District Court matter based on a joint stipulation by the parties pending a final written decision on the IPRs.
4 unchanged sentences
In December 2022, Take2 Technologies, Ltd.
−Removed: and the Chinese University of Hong Kong filed a complaint in the U.S.
+Added: ("Take2") and the Chinese University of Hong Kong filed a complaint in the U.S.
District Court for Delaware against us alleging infringement of U.S.
4 unchanged sentences
We filed a motion to dismiss on February 14, 2023.
−Removed: We also filed a motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of California on March 2, 2023, and, on August 2, 2023, that motion was granted.
+Added: We also filed a motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of California which was granted on August 2, 2023 and the case was transferred on August 16, 2023 (C.A.
+Added: 5:23-cv-04166).
+Added: The hearing on the motion to dismiss is scheduled for December 13, 2023.
+Added: Take2 filed a motion to disqualify our in-house legal department from representing PacBio in the district court action on September 20, 2023.
+Added: We opposed Take2’s disqualification motion on October 4, 2023.
+Added: An oral hearing on the disqualification motion was held on October 26, 2023 and the court is expected to issue an order on the motion in due course.
+Added: We filed a petition for inter parties review at the USTPO (IPR2024-00028) challenging the validity of all claims of the ’794 patent on October 17, 2023.
+Added: A hearing was held on August 9, 2023.
We believe the infringement allegations in the complaint lack merit and we intend to vigorously defend in this matter.
16 unchanged sentences
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.