LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
−Removed: March 4, 2021 a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial (the “Complaint”) was filed by a plaintiff (the “Plaintiff”)
−Removed: in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
−Removed: The Complaint named Ozop Energy Solutions, Inc.
−Removed: and Brian Conway, Ozop’s Chief Executive Officer, (the “CEO”).
−Removed: OZOP and the CEO are collectively referred to herein
−Removed: as “Defendants”.
−Removed: On May 12, 2021, the plaintiff and or their counsel, gave notice that the above action is voluntarily dismissed,
−Removed: pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, without prejudice against the defendants Brian Conway and OZOP
−Removed: Energy Solutions, Inc.
+Added: November 14, 2022, Ozop Energy Systems, Inc.
+Added: filed a complaint in the Superior Court for County of San Diego, State of California, Ozop
+Added: Energy Systems, Inc.
+Added: Serna, et al ., Case No.
+Added: 37-2022-00046102-CU-BT-NC, against five former employees, and a corporation owned
+Added: by two of those defendants, Your Home Solution Corp.
+Added: (“YHS”), which asserts claims for (1) fraud and deceit;
+Added: (2) breach of
+Added: duty of loyalty;
+Added: (3) intentional interference with prospective economic advantage;
+Added: (4) violation of Penal Code section 496;
+Added: (5) violation
+Added: of Business and Professions Code section 17200, et.
+Added: (6) and accounting.
+Added: The Complaint alleges that the individual defendants, while
+Added: working for Ozop Energy Systems, Inc., illegally diverted customers and profits that belonged to Ozop Energy Systems, Inc.
+Added: The Complaint
+Added: seeks damages in the form of past and future profits, restitution of compensation, and punitive damages.
than the above, we know of no legal proceedings to which we are a party or to which any of our property is the subject, which are pending,
2 unchanged sentences
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.