What changed in this filing

/stocks — the workspaceLOADING

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis

2022-03-04 compared with 2021-03-05 · 597 added, 586 removed, 330 unchanged (78% of the section changed)

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This discussion highlights key information as determined by management but may not contain all of the information that is important to you.

For a more complete understanding, the following should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 included in Part II.

We have prepared this Management's Discussion and Analysis as an aid to understanding our financial results.

It highlights key information as determined by management but may not contain all of the information that is important to you.

It should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Part II.

Item 8 of this report.

Discussions of 2018 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2019 and 2018 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

Discussions of 2019 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2020 and 2019 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Part II.

Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

This annual report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.

3 unchanged sentences

Net income attributable to the Company increased 14% to $37.5 million or $6.00 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2021, from $32.9 million, or $5.11 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Significant items contributing to the increase in 2020 compared to 2019 were:

• an increase in mortgage banking income due to increased mortgage production and refinance activity;

• an increase in net interest income resulting from higher average net interest-earning asset balances.

The increase in net income is the result of an $11.6 million increase in net income in the Community Banking segment, which was only partially offset by a $7.0 million decrease in net income in the Home Mortgage Lending segment.

Highlights for the year ended December 31, 2021 are as follows:

• Total revenues, which include net interest income plus other operating income, increased 32% to $134.0 million in 2020 from $101.8 million in 2019.

This increase mainly reflects increases in net interest income and mortgage banking income.

These increases were partially offset by a decreases in purchased receivable income and unrealized gains on marketable equity securities.

• Net income in the Community Banking segment increased 74% or $11.6 million, to $27.2 million in 2021 as compared to 2020.

This increase was primarily the result of the following:

◦ Interest and fee income on PPP loans increased $7.3 million to $15.4 million in 2021 from $8.1 million in 2020.

Interest income on PPP loans was $2.9 million and $2.5 million in 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Loan fee income on PPP loans was $12.5 million and $5.6 million in 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Loan fee income on PPP loans is largely made up of fees fully recognized upon loan forgiveness from the SBA.

In 2021, $426.3 million PPP loans were forgiven compared to $65.1 million in 2020.

As of December 31, 2021, there is $4.5 million in deferred PPP loan fees, net of deferred costs, remaining to be recognized.

Management expects the majority of the remaining deferred fees to be recognized in 2022.

◦ The provision for credit losses decreased in 2021 to a benefit of $4.1 million from a provision of $2.4 million in 2020.

As of January 1, 2021, the Company implemented ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses ("ASU 2016-13" or "CECL").

The provision for 2021 was recorded using the CECL methodology and reflects expected lifetime credit losses on loans and off-balance sheet unfunded loan commitments.

The decrease in the provision for credit losses in 2021 compared to 2020 is primarily the result of improvement in economic assumptions used to estimate lifetime credit losses, which have improved but are not yet at pre-pandemic levels.

Our nonperforming loans, net of government guarantees, increased to $10.7 million at the end of 2021 compared to $10.0 million at the end of 2020, while total adversely classified loans, net of government guarantees at December 31, 2021 increased to $13.7 million from $12.8 million at December 31, 2020.

The Allowance for Credit Losses ("ACL") totaled 0.83% of total portfolio loans at December 31, 2021, compared to 1.46% at December 31, 2020.

The ACL compared to nonperforming loans, net of government guarantees, was 110% at December 31, 2021 compared to 210% at the end of 2020.

◦ Interest expense decreased $2.3 million to $3.8 million in 2021 from $6.1 million in 2020 due to lower interest rates.

◦ The changes above where partially offset by a $3.8 million increase in tax expense in the Community Banking segment in 2021 primarily due to higher taxable income in 2021 compared to 2020.

• Net income in the Home Mortgage Lending segment decreased 40%, or $7.0 million, to $10.3 million in 2021 from $17.3 million in 2020 primarily due to a decrease in production volume to $1.118 billion in 2021 from $1.295 billion in 2020, as well as a $3.7 million decrease in the change in fair value of the interest rate lock commitments as the loan pipeline decreased at December 31, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020.

• The net interest margin decreased to 3.58% in 2021 from 4.02% in 2020 mostly due to a decrease in average yields on interest earning assets to 3.74% in 2021 compared to 4.36% in 2020 as a result of lower interest rates.

Additionally, the mix of earning assets, specifically the addition of lower yielding PPP loans, also contributed to the decrease in the net interest margin in 2020 as compared to the prior year.

• The provision for loan losses increased in 2020 to a provision of $2.4 million from a benefit of $1.2 million in 2019 primarily due to management's assessment of risks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, which were only partially offset by improvement in the overall credit quality of the loan portfolio.

Our nonperforming loans, net of government guarantees, decreased to $10.0 million at the end of 2020 compared to $14.0 million at the end of 2019, while total adversely classified loans, net of government guarantees at December 31, 2020 decreased to $12.8 million from $22.3 million at December 31, 2019.

The allowance for loan losses (“Allowance”) totaled 1.46% of total portfolio loans at December 31, 2020, compared to 1.83% at December 31, 2019.

The Allowance compared to nonperforming loans, net of government guarantees, was 210% at December 31, 2020 compared to 137% at the end of 2019.

• Return on average assets was 1.70% in 2020 compared to 1.33% in 2019.

Additionally, the mix of earning assets, specifically an increase in interest-bearing cash, also contributed to the decrease in the net interest margin in 2021 as compared to the prior year.

• The Company continued to maintain strong capital ratios with Tier 1 Capital to Risk Adjusted Assets of 14.08% at December 31, 2021 as compared to 14.20% at December 31, 2020.

3 unchanged sentences

• Industry Exposure:

Northrim has identified various industries that may be adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and the decline in oil prices that occurred in 2020.

Northrim has identified various industries that may be adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and the volatility in oil prices that has occurred over the last year and a half, though oil prices have rebounded recently.

Though the industries affected may change through the progression of the pandemic, the following sectors for which the Company has exposure, as a percent of the total loan portfolio as of December 31, 2021 are being impacted:

Tourism (5%), Oil and Gas (4%), Aviation (non-tourism) (4%), Healthcare (7%), Accommodations (3%), Retail (1%) and Restaurants (2%).

The Company's exposure as a percent of the total loan portfolio excluding PPP loans as of December 31, 2020 are:

Tourism (7%), Oil and Gas (6%), Aviation (non-tourism) (5%), Healthcare (8%), Accommodations (3%), Retail (2%) and Restaurants (3%).

Healthcare (8%), Tourism (7%), Oil and Gas (4%), Aviation (non-tourism) (4%), Accommodations (4%), Fishing (4%), Restaurants and Breweries (3%) and Retail (2%).

The portion of the Company's Allowance that related to the loans with exposure to these industries is estimated at the following amounts as of December 31, 2021:

(In Thousands) Tourism Aviation (non-tourism) Healthcare Retail Restaurants and Breweries Fishing Accommodations Total

Allowance $896 $565 $1,257 $332 $486 $432 $507 $4,475

• Customer Accommodations:

The Company has implemented several forms of assistance to help customers experiencing financial challenges as a result of COVID-19 in addition to our participation in PPP lending.

The provisions of the CARES Act included an election to not apply the guidance on accounting for certain troubled debt restructurings related to COVID-19 and allow certain accommodations to borrowers.

The Company has implemented assistance to help customers experiencing financial challenges as a result of COVID-19 in addition to our participation in PPP lending.

The provisions of the CARES Act included an election to not apply the guidance on accounting for certain troubled debt restructurings ("TDR") related to COVID-19 and allow certain accommodations to borrowers.

These accommodations include interest only and deferral options on loan payments, as well as the waiver of various fees related to loans, deposits and other services.

5 unchanged sentences

Number of modifications 16 1 17

Loan Modifications due to COVID-19 as of September 30, 2020

(Dollars in thousands) Interest Only Full Payment Deferral Total

Portfolio loans $46,056 $74,337 $120,393

Number of modifications 16 59 75

Loan Modifications due to COVID-19 as of June 30, 2020

Loan Modifications due to COVID-19 as of December 31, 2020

(Dollars in thousands) Interest Only Full Payment Deferral Total

1 unchanged sentence

Number of modifications 23 11 34

Consumer loans represent less than 1% of total loan modifications identified above.

Of the $65.5 million and 34 loan modifications as of December 31, 2020, approximately $53.9 million and 31 loans have entered into a second modification.

• Loan Loss Reserve:

The Company booked a loan loss provision of $2.4 million in 2020 compared to a benefit for loan loss provisions of $1.2 million in 2019.

• Credit Quality:

Net adversely classified loans were $12.8 million at December 31, 2020, compared to $22.3 million at December 31, 2019.

All 17 loan modifications as of December 31, 2021, have entered into more than one modification.

• Branch Operations:

All branches are fully operational, while a number of customer and employee safety measure continue to be implemented.

All branches have returned to pre-pandemic levels, while a number of customer and employee safety measure continue to be implemented.

• Growth and Paycheck Protection Program:

• Northrim funded 2,888 PPP loans totaling $375.6 million to both existing and new customers in 2020.

• According to the SBA, the Company originated more PPP loans in the State of Alaska than any other financial institution, funding 23% of the number and 28% of the value of all Alaska PPP loans for the period ending September 30, 2020.

• Over the last two years, Northrim funded a total of nearly 5,800 PPP loans totaling $612.6 million to both existing and new customers.

• Management estimates that Northrim funded approximately 24% of the number and 32% of the value of all Alaska PPP second round loans.

• As of December 31, 2021, Northrim customers had received forgiveness through the SBA on 4,451 PPP loans totaling $491.4 million.

• The Company initially utilized the Federal Reserve Bank's Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Facility (the "PPPLF") to fund PPP loans, but paid those funds back in full during the second quarter and has since funded the PPP loans through core deposits and maturity of long-term investments.

• Capital Management:

At December 31, 2020, the capital of Northrim Bank (the "Bank") was well in excess of all regulatory requirements.

Critical Accounting Policies

The SEC defines "critical accounting policies" as those that require application of management's most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in future periods.

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.

Not all of these significant accounting policies require management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments or estimates.

Management believes that the following accounting policies would be considered critical under the SEC's definition.

Allowance for loan losses:

The Company maintains an Allowance to reflect inherent losses in its loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date.

The Company performs regular credit reviews of the loan portfolio to determine the credit quality and adherence to underwriting standards.

When loans are originated, they are assigned a risk rating that is reassessed periodically during the term of the loan through the credit review process.

The Company's risk rating methodology assigns risk ratings ranging from 1 to 10, where a higher rating represents higher risk.

These risk ratings are then consolidated into five classes, which include pass, special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss.

These classes are a primary factor in determining an appropriate amount for the allowance for loan losses.

Each class is assessed an inherent credit loss factor that determines an amount of allowance for loan losses provided for that group of loans.

This allowance is then adjusted for qualitative factors, by segment and class.

Qualitative factors are based on management’s assessment of current trends that may cause losses inherent in the current loan portfolio to differ significantly from historical losses.

Some factors that management considers in determining the qualitative adjustment to the general reserve include loan quality trends in our own portfolio, the degree of concentrations of large borrowers in our loan portfolio, national and local economic trends, business conditions, underwriting policies and standards, trends in local real estate markets, effects of various political activities, peer group data, and internal factors such as underwriting policies and expertise of the Company’s employees.

Regular credit reviews of the portfolio also identify loans that are considered potentially impaired.

A loan is considered impaired when based on current information and events, we determine that we will probably not be able to collect all amounts due according to the loan contract, including scheduled interest payments.

When we identify a loan as impaired, we measure the impairment using discounted cash flows, except when the sole remaining source of the repayment for the loan is the liquidation of the collateral.

In these cases, we use the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs, instead of discounted cash flows.

The analysis of collateral dependent loans includes appraisals on loans secured by real property, management’s assessment of the current market, recent payment history and an evaluation of other sources of repayment.

The Company obtains appraisals on real and personal property that secure its loans during the loan origination process in accordance with regulatory guidance and its loan policy.

The Company obtains updated appraisals on loans secured by real or personal property based upon its assessment of changes in the current market or particular projects or properties, information from other current appraisals and other sources of information.

The Company uses the information provided in these updated appraisals along with its evaluation of all other information available on a particular property as it assesses the collateral coverage on its performing and nonperforming loans and the impact that may have on the adequacy of its Allowance.

If we determine that the value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, we either recognize an impairment reserve as a specific component to be provided for in the Allowance or charge-off the impaired balance on collateral dependent loans if it is determined that such amount represents a confirmed loss.

The combination of the risk rating-based allowance component and the impairment reserve allowance component lead to an allocated allowance for loan losses.

Finally, the Company assesses the overall adequacy of the Allowance based on several factors including the level of the Allowance as compared to total loans and nonperforming loans in light of current economic conditions.

This portion of the Allowance is deemed “unallocated” because it is not allocated to any segment or class of the loan portfolio.

This portion of the Allowance provides for coverage of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio but not captured in the credit loss factors that are utilized in the risk rating-based component or in the specific impairment component of the Allowance and acknowledges the inherent imprecision of all loss prediction models.

The unallocated portion of the Allowance is based upon management’s evaluation of various factors that are not directly measured in the determination of the allocated portions of the Allowance.

Such factors include uncertainties in identifying triggering events that directly correlate to subsequent loss rates, uncertainties in economic conditions, risk factors that have not yet manifested themselves in loss allocation factors, and historical loss experience data that may not precisely correspond to the current portfolio.

In addition, the unallocated reserve may fluctuate based upon the direction of various risk indicators.

Examples of such factors include the risk as to current economic conditions, the level and trend of charge offs or

recoveries, and the risk of heightened imprecision or inconsistency of appraisals used in estimating real estate values.

Although this allocation process may not accurately predict credit losses by loan type or in aggregate, the total allowance for credit losses is available to absorb losses that may arise from any loan type or category.

Due to the subjectivity involved in the determination of the unallocated portion of the Allowance, the relationship of the unallocated component to the total Allowance may fluctuate from period to period.

Based on our methodology and its components, management believes the resulting Allowance is adequate and appropriate for the risk identified in the Company's loan portfolio.

Given current processes employed by the Company, management believes the segments, classes, and estimated loss rates currently assigned are appropriate.

It is possible that others, given the same information, may at any point in time reach different reasonable conclusions that could be material to the Company's financial statements.

In addition, current loan classes and fair value estimates of collateral are subject to change as we continue to review loans within our portfolio and as our borrowers are impacted by economic trends within their market areas.

Although we have established an Allowance that we consider adequate, there can be no assurance that the established Allowance will be sufficient to offset losses on loans in the future.

In addition, a substantial percentage of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate;

as a result, a significant decline in real estate market values may require an increase in the Allowance.

Valuation of goodwill and other intangibles:

Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized but instead are periodically tested for impairment.

Management performs an impairment analysis for the intangible assets with indefinite lives on an annual basis as of December 31.

Additionally, goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are evaluated on an interim basis when events or circumstances indicate impairment potentially exists.

The impairment analysis requires management to make subjective judgments.

Events and factors that may significantly affect the estimates include, among others, competitive forces, customer behaviors and attrition, changes in revenue growth trends, cost structures, technology, changes in discount rates and specific industry and market conditions.

There can be no assurance that changes in circumstances, estimates or assumptions may result in additional impairment of all, or some portion of, goodwill or other intangible assets.

The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment testing at December 31, 2020 and 2019 in accordance with the policy described in Note 1 to the financial statements included with this report.

At December 31, 2020, the Company performed its annual impairment test by performing a quantitative assessment.

The Company estimated the fair value of the Company using two valuation methodologies including a control premium approach and a discounted cash flow approach.

We then compared the estimated fair value of each segment to the carrying value and concluded that no potential impairment existed at of December 31, 2020

Valuation of OREO:

OREO represents properties acquired through foreclosure or its equivalent.

Prior to foreclosure, the carrying value is adjusted to the fair value, less cost to sell, of the real estate to be acquired by an adjustment to the allowance for loan loss.

The amount by which the fair value less cost to sell is greater than the carrying amount of the loan plus amounts previously charged off is recognized in earnings.

Any subsequent reduction in the carrying value is charged against earnings.

Management's evaluation of fair value is based on appraisals or discounted cash flows of anticipated sales.

The amounts ultimately recovered from the sale of OREO may differ from the carrying value of the assets because of market factors beyond the Company's control or due to changes in the Company's strategies for recovering the investment.

Servicing rights:

The Company measures mortgage servicing rights ("MSRs") and commercial servicing rights ("CSRs") at fair value on a recurring basis with changes in fair value going through earnings in the period in which the change occurs.

Changes in the fair value of MSRs are recorded in mortgage banking income, and changes in the fair value of CSRs are recorded in commercial servicing revenue.

Fair value adjustments encompass market-driven valuation changes and the decrease in value that occurs from the passage of time, which are separately reported.

Retained servicing rights are measured at fair value as of the date of sale.

Initial and subsequent fair value measurements are determined using a discounted cash flow model.

In order to determine the fair value of servicing rights, the present value of expected net future cash flows is estimated.

Assumptions used include market discount rates, anticipated prepayment speeds, escrow calculations, delinquency rates and ancillary fee income net of servicing costs.

The model assumptions for MSRs are also compared to publicly filed information from several large MSR holders, as available.

A hierarchical disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observability is utilized in measuring financial instruments at fair value.

The degree of judgment utilized in measuring the fair value of financial instruments generally correlates to the level of pricing observability.

Financial instruments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of pricing observability and a lesser degree of judgment utilized in measuring fair value.

Conversely, financial instruments rarely traded or not quoted will generally have little or no pricing observability and a higher degree of judgment utilized in measuring fair value.

Pricing observability is impacted by a number of factors, including the type of financial instrument, whether the financial instrument is new to the market and not yet established and the characteristics specific to the transaction.

Impact of accounting pronouncements to be implemented in future periods

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (“ASU 2016-13” or "CECL").

ASU 2016-13 is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring timelier recording of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments held by financial institutions and other organizations.

Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates, but will continue to use judgment to determine which loss estimation method is appropriate for their circumstances.

ASU 2016-13 is effective for the Company for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2019, and must be applied prospectively.

However, on October 16, 2019 the FASB voted to delay ASU 2016-13 for Smaller Reporting Companies.

The Company has elected Small Reporting Company status, which changes the effective date for ASU 2016-13 for the Company to fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2022.

Early application was permitted for specified periods.

The Company early adopted ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2021 after finalizing data and model validation and our internal governance framework.

The guidance was applied on a modified retrospective basis with the cumulative effect of initially applying the amendments recognized in retained earnings at January 1, 2021.

However, certain provisions of the guidance are only required to be applied on a prospective basis.

Adoption of CECL as of January 1, 2021 resulted in an allowance for loan losses of $16.6 million, which is a $4.5 million decrease in the allowance under the incurred loss model as of December 31, 2020.

This decrease will increase the Company's total shareholder's equity by $3.2 million.

The reduction reflects a decrease for all loan segments given their short contractual maturities.

The Company does not hold a material amount of residential mortgage loans with long or indeterminate maturities as of December 31, 2020.

In most instances the Company believes that the ACL for residential mortgage loans with long or indeterminate maturities would lead to an increase in the ACL.

Adoption of CECL as of January 1, 2021 resulted in a reserve for unfunded commitments of $1.4 million, which is a $1.2 million increase in the reserve under the incurred loss model as of December 31, 2020.

This increase will decrease the Company's total shareholder's equity by $880,000.

See the “A ccounting pronouncements to be implemented in future periods ” section in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II.

Item 8 of this report for further discussion of the Company's implementation of CECL.

• The Company initially utilized the Federal Reserve Bank's Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Facility (the "PPPLF") to fund PPP loans, but paid those funds back in full during the second quarter of 2020 and has since funded the PPP loans through core deposits and maturity of long-term investments.

Trends in Miscellaneous Financial Data (1)

Years Ended December 31,

(In thousands, except per share data and shares outstanding amounts)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Five Year Compound Growth Rate

Net interest income $80,827 $70,665 $64,442 $61,208 $57,678 $56,357 7 %

Provision (benefit) for credit losses (4,099) 2,432 (1,175) (500) 3,200 2,298 NM

Other operating income 52,263 63,328 37,346 32,167 40,474 43,263 4 %

Compensation expense, RML acquisition payments — — 468 — 130 4,775 (100)

Other operating expense 89,196 89,114 76,370 69,800 71,023 71,505 5 %

Income before provision for income taxes $47,993 $42,447 $26,125 $24,075 $23,799 $21,042 18 %

Provision for income taxes 10,476 9,559 5,434 4,071 10,321 6,052 12 %

Net Income 37,517 32,888 20,691 20,004 13,478 14,990 20 %

Net income attributable to

noncontrolling interest — — — — 327 579 (100)

Net income attributable to Northrim Bancorp, Inc.

$37,517 $32,888 $20,691 $20,004 $13,151 $14,411 21 %

Year End Balance Sheet

Assets $2,724,719 $2,121,798 $1,643,996 $1,502,988 $1,518,596 $1,525,851 12 %

Loans 1,413,886 1,444,050 1,043,371 984,346 954,953 974,074 8 %

Deposits 2,421,631 1,824,981 1,372,351 1,228,088 1,258,283 1,267,653 14 %

Shareholders' equity 237,817 221,575 207,117 205,947 192,802 186,712 5 %

Common shares outstanding 6,014,813 6,251,004 6,558,809 6,883,216 6,871,963 6,897,890 (3) %

Average Balance Sheet

Assets $2,432,599 $1,936,047 $1,555,707 $1,493,385 $1,511,052 $1,506,522 10 %

Earning assets 2,260,778 1,758,839 1,386,557 1,346,449 1,367,203 1,361,913 11 %

Loans 1,478,318 1,339,908 1,010,098 971,548 981,001 976,613 9 %

Deposits 2,125,080 1,638,216 1,276,407 1,227,272 1,248,333 1,250,243 11 %

Shareholders' equity 239,214 211,721 208,602 201,022 193,129 181,628 6 %

Basic common shares outstanding 6,180,801 6,354,687 6,708,622 6,877,573 6,889,621 6,883,663 (2) %

Diluted common shares outstanding 6,249,313 6,431,367 6,808,209 6,981,557 6,977,910 6,974,864 (2) %

Per Common Share Data

Basic earnings $6.07 $5.18 $3.08 $2.91 $1.91 $2.09 24 %

Diluted earnings $6.00 $5.11 $3.04 $2.86 $1.88 $2.06 24 %

Book value per share $39.54 $35.45 $31.58 $29.92 $28.06 $27.07 8 %

Tangible book value per share (2)

$36.88 $32.88 $29.12 $27.57 $25.70 $24.70 8 %

Cash dividends per share $1.50 $1.38 $1.26 $1.02 $0.86 $0.78 14 %

Years Ended December 31,

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Five Year Compound Growth Rate

Performance Ratios

Return on average assets 1.54 % 1.70 % 1.33 % 1.34 % 0.87 % 0.96 % 10 %

Return on average equity 15.68 % 15.53 % 9.92 % 9.95 % 6.81 % 7.93 % 15 %

Equity/assets 8.73 % 10.44 % 12.60 % 13.70 % 12.70 % 12.24 % (7) %

Tangible common equity/tangible assets (3)

8.19 % 9.76 % 11.73 % 12.76 % 11.75 % 11.29 % (6) %

Net interest margin 3.58 % 4.02 % 4.65 % 4.55 % 4.22 % 4.14 % (3) %

Net interest margin (tax equivalent) (4)

3.60 % 4.05 % 4.70 % 4.60 % 4.28 % 4.20 % (3) %

Non-interest income/total revenue 39.27 % 47.26 % 36.69 % 34.45 % 41.24 % 43.43 % (2) %

Efficiency ratio (5)

66.99 % 66.47 % 75.43 % 74.68 % 72.39 % 76.44 % (3) %

Dividend payout ratio 25.02 % 26.66 % 40.79 % 35.08 % 45.44 % 37.59 % (8) %

Asset Quality

Nonperforming loans, net of government guarantees $10,672 $10,048 $13,951 $14,694 $21,411 $12,936 (4) %

Nonperforming assets, net of government guarantees 15,031 16,289 19,946 22,619 28,729 19,315 (5) %

Nonperforming loans, net of government guarantees/portfolio loans 0.75 % 0.70 % 1.34 % 1.49 % 2.24 % 1.33 % (11) %

Net charge-offs (recoveries)/average loans 0.07 % 0.03 % (0.07) % 0.15 % 0.15 % 0.08 % (3) %

Allowance for credit losses/portfolio loans 0.83 % 1.46 % 1.83 % 1.98 % 2.25 % 2.02 % (16) %

Nonperforming assets, net of government guarantees/assets 0.55 % 0.77 % 1.21 % 1.50 % 1.89 % 1.27 % (15) %

Effective tax rate (6)

22 % 23 % 21 % 17 % 43 % 29 % (5) %

Number of banking offices (7)

18 17 16 16 14 14 5 %

Number of employees (FTE) (8)

451 438 431 430 429 451 — %

1 These unaudited schedules provide selected financial information concerning the Company that should be read in conjunction with Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of this report.

2 Tangible book value per share is a non-GAAP ratio defined as shareholders’ equity, less intangible assets, divided by common shares outstanding.

Management believes that tangible book value is a useful measurement of the value of the Company’s equity because it excludes the effect of intangible assets on the Company’s equity.

See reconciliation to book value per share, the most comparable GAAP measurement below.

3 Tangible common equity to tangible assets is a non-GAAP ratio that represents total equity less goodwill and intangible assets divided by total assets less goodwill and intangible assets.

Management believes this ratio is important as it has received more attention over the past several years from stock analysts and regulators.

The most comparable GAAP measure of shareholders' equity to total assets is calculated by dividing total shareholders' equity by total assets.

See reconciliation to shareholders' equity to total assets below.

4 Tax-equivalent net interest margin is a non-GAAP performance measurement in which interest income on non-taxable investments and loans is presented on a tax-equivalent basis using a combined federal and state statutory rate of 28.43% in 2018 through 2021 and 41.11% in all other years presented.

Management believes that tax-equivalent net interest margin is a useful financial measure because it enables investors to evaluate net interest margin excluding tax expense in order to monitor our effectiveness in growing higher interest yielding assets and

managing our costs of interest bearing liabilities over time on a fully tax equivalent basis.

See reconciliation to net interest margin, the comparable GAAP measurement below.

5 In managing our business, we review the efficiency ratio exclusive of intangible asset amortization, which is a non-GAAP performance measurement.

Management believes that this is a useful financial measurement because we believe this presentation provides investors with a more accurate picture of our operating efficiency.

The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing other operating expense, exclusive of intangible asset amortization, by the sum of net interest income and other operating income.

Other companies may define or calculate this data differently.

For additional information see the "Other Operating Expense" section in Part II.

Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of this report.

See reconciliation to comparable GAAP measurement below.

6 The Company’s 2017 results included the impact of the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017.

The law includes significant changes to the U.S.

corporate tax system, including a Federal corporate rate reduction from 35% to 21%.

In 2017, the Company applied the newly enacted corporate federal income tax rate of 21%, reducing the value of the Company's net deferred tax asset, resulting in approximately a $2.7 million increase in tax expense.

In 2018, the Company finalized changes related to the reduction in the federal tax rate which resulted in a $470,000 reduction in tax expense.

7 Number of banking offices does not include RML locations.

2021 number of banking offices includes 17 full service branches and 1 loan production office.

2020 number of banking offices includes 16 full service branches and 1 loan production office.

2018 number of banking offices includes 15 full service branches and 1 loan production office.

8 FTE includes 321, 312, 311, 320, 314, and 321 Community Banking employees in 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

FTE includes 130, 126, 120, 110, 115, and 130 Home Mortgage Lending employees in 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Reconciliation of Selected Non-GAAP Financial Data to GAAP Financial Measures

These unaudited schedules provide selected financial information concerning the Company that should be read in conjunction with "Part II.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of this report.

Reconciliation of total shareholders' equity to tangible common shareholders’ equity (Non-GAAP) and total assets to tangible assets:

(In Thousands) 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Total shareholders' equity $237,817 $221,575 $207,117 $205,947 $192,802 $186,712

Total assets 2,724,719 2,121,798 1,643,996 1,502,988 1,518,596 1,525,851

Total shareholders' equity to total assets ratio 8.73 % 10.44 % 12.60 % 13.70 % 12.70 % 12.24 %

(In Thousands) 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Total shareholders' equity $237,817 $221,575 $207,117 $205,947 $192,802 $186,712

goodwill and other intangible assets, net 16,009 16,046 16,094 16,154 16,224 16,324

Tangible common shareholders' equity $221,808 $205,529 $191,023 $189,793 $176,578 $170,388

Total assets $2,724,719 $2,121,798 $1,643,996 $1,502,988 $1,518,596 $1,525,851

goodwill and other intangible assets, net 16,009 16,046 16,094 16,154 16,224 16,324

Tangible assets $2,708,710 $2,105,752 $1,627,902 $1,486,834 $1,502,372 $1,509,527

Tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio 8.19 % 9.76 % 11.73 % 12.76 % 11.75 % 11.29 %

Reconciliation of tangible book value per share (Non-GAAP) to book value per share

(In thousands, except per share data) 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Total shareholders' equity $237,817 $221,575 $207,117 $205,947 $192,802 $186,712

Divided by common shares outstanding 6,014,813 6,251,004 6,558,809 6,883,216 6,871,963 6,897,890

Book value per share $39.54 $35.45 $31.58 $29.92 $28.06 $27.07

(In thousands, except per share data) 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Total shareholders' equity $237,817 $221,575 $207,117 $205,947 $192,802 $186,712

goodwill and intangible assets, net 16,009 16,046 16,094 16,154 16,224 16,324

Tangible book value $221,808 $205,529 $191,023 $189,793 $176,578 $170,388

Divided by common shares outstanding 6,014,813 6,251,004 6,558,809 6,883,216 6,871,963 6,897,890

Tangible book value per share $36.88 $32.88 $29.12 $27.57 $25.70 $24.70

Reconciliation of tax-equivalent net interest margin (Non-GAAP) to net interest margin

(In Thousands) 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Net interest income (9)

$80,827 $70,665 $64,442 $61,208 $57,678 $56,357

Divided by average interest-bearing assets 2,260,778 1,758,839 1,386,557 1,346,449 1,367,203 1,361,913

Net interest margin 3.58 % 4.02 % 4.65 % 4.55 % 4.22 % 4.14 %

(In Thousands) 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Net interest income (9)

$80,827 $70,665 $64,442 $61,208 $57,678 $56,357

reduction in tax expense related to

tax-exempt interest income 489 613 722 726 872 808

$81,316 $71,278 $65,164 $61,934 $58,550 $57,165

Divided by average interest-bearing assets 2,260,778 1,758,839 1,386,557 1,346,449 1,367,203 1,361,913

Tax-equivalent net interest margin 3.60 % 4.05 % 4.70 % 4.60 % 4.28 % 4.20 %

Calculation of efficiency ratio

(In Thousands) 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Net interest income (9)

$80,827 $70,665 $64,442 $61,208 $57,678 $56,357

Other operating income 52,263 63,328 37,346 32,167 40,474 43,263

Total revenue 133,090 133,993 101,788 93,375 98,152 99,620

Other operating expense 89,196 89,114 76,838 69,800 71,153 76,280

Less intangible asset amortization 37 48 60 70 100 135

Adjusted other operating expense $89,159 $89,066 $76,778 $69,730 $71,053 $76,145

Efficiency ratio 66.99 % 66.47 % 75.43 % 74.68 % 72.39 % 76.44 %

9 Amount represents net interest income before provision for loan losses.

Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied, and are not audited.

Although we believe these non-GAAP financial measures are frequently used by stakeholders in the evaluation of the Company, they have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of results as reported under GAAP.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

2 unchanged sentences

We also generate other income primarily through mortgage banking income, purchased receivables products, service charges and fees, and bankcard fees.

Our operating expenses consist in large part of salaries and other personnel costs, occupancy, data processing, marketing, and professional services expenses.

Interest income and cost of funds, or interest expense, are affected significantly by general economic conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates, by government policies and the actions of regulatory authorities, and by competition in our markets.

Our operating expenses consist in large part of salaries and other personnel costs, data processing, occupancy, marketing, and professional services expenses.

Interest income and cost of funds, or interest expense, and mortgage banking income are affected significantly by general economic conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates, by government policies and the actions of regulatory authorities, and by competition in our markets.

We earned net income of $37.5 million in 2021, compared to net income of $32.9 million in 2020.

During these periods, net income per diluted share was $6.00 and $5.11, respectively.

The increase in net income in 2020 compared to 2019 was primarily due to increases in other operating income, specifically mortgage banking income, as well as improved net interest income.

The following sections present discussion of the components that make up net income.

Net Interest Income / Net Interest Margin

4 unchanged sentences

Net interest income in 2021 was $80.8 million, compared to $70.7 million in 2020.

The increase in 2020 as compared to 2019 was the result of higher net average interest-earning asset balances which was only partially offset by a decrease in net interest income as a result of decreased interest rates.

Additionally, the Company recognized $5.6 million in loan fee income from PPP loans in 2020.

The increase in 2021 as compared to 2020 was primarily the result of a $7.3 million increase in interest and fee income on PPP loans in 2021 compared to 2020.

Interest income on PPP loans was $2.9 million and $2.5 million in 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Loan fee income on PPP loans was $12.5 million and $5.6 million in 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Loan fee income on PPP loans is largely made up of fees fully recognized upon loan forgiveness from the SBA.

Interest income not related to PPP loans also increased $934,000 in 2021 as compared to 2020 due to higher net average interest-earning asset balances that was only partially offset by a decrease in interest rates.

Interest expense decreased $2.1 million as a result of lower interest rates.

During 2021 and 2020, net interest margins were 3.58% and 4.02%, respectively.

The decrease in net interest margin in 2020 as compared to 2019 is the result of decreases in the spread between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities which was impacted by a decrease in interest rates.

The decrease in net interest margin in 2021 as compared to 2020 is the result of decreases in the spread between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities which was impacted by a decrease in interest rates, as well as a change in the mix of interest earning-assets.

Average loans, the Company's highest yielding interest-earning asset, decreased to 65% of total average interest-earning assets in 2021 from 76% in the 2020.

Short-term investments, the Company's lowest yielding interest-earning asset, increased to 14% of total average interest-earning assets in 2021 from 4% in the 2020.

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated information with regard to average balances of assets and liabilities, as well as the total dollar amounts of interest income from interest-earning assets and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities.

Average yields or costs, net interest income, and net interest margin are also presented.

Average yields or costs are not calculated on a tax-equivalent basis:

Years ended December 31, 2021 2020 2019

4 unchanged sentences

Loans held for sale 101,752 2,849 2.80 % 105,287 3,215 3.05 % 56,344 2,231 3.96 %

Long-term Investments (3)

Taxable long-term investments (3)

368,319 4,900 1.33 % 245,148 5,234 2.14 % 269,228 6,891 2.56 %

Short-term investments (4)

Non-taxable long-term investments (3)

853 18 2.11 % 2,236 82 3.67 % 4,483 120 2.68 %

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks (4)

311,536 447 0.14 % 66,260 309 0.47 % 46,404 922 1.99 %

Total interest-earning assets (5)

2,260,778 84,606 3.74 % 1,758,839 76,716 4.36 % 1,386,557 70,083 5.05 %

Noninterest-earning assets 171,821 177,208 169,150

Total $2,432,599 $1,936,047 $1,555,707

Interest-bearing deposits $1,040,606 $5,279 0.51 % $850,202 $4,961 0.58 % $809,808 $2,307 0.28 %

Interest-bearing demand $575,298 $484 0.08 % $387,417 $622 0.16 % $272,894 $475 0.17 %

Savings deposits 323,131 499 0.15 % 257,292 717 0.28 % 233,057 1,082 0.46 %

Money market deposits 264,344 418 0.16 % 219,024 708 0.32 % 209,246 1,142 0.55 %

Time deposits 178,215 1,676 0.94 % 176,873 3,232 1.83 % 135,005 2,262 1.68 %

Total interest-bearing deposits 1,340,988 3,077 0.23 % 1,040,606 5,279 0.51 % 850,202 4,961 0.58 %

Borrowings 24,993 702 2.81 % 35,918 772 1.37 % 33,730 680 2.02 %

15 unchanged sentences

3 Consists of investment securities available for sale, investment securities held to maturity, marketable equity securities, and investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock.

Taxable long-term investments consist of U.S.

treasury and government sponsored entities, corporate bonds, collateral loan obligations, marketable equity securities, and Federal Home Loan Bank stock.

Non-taxable long-term investments consist of municipal securities.

4 Consists of interest bearing deposits in other banks and domestic CDs.

5 The Company does not have any fed funds sold or securities purchased with agreements to resell to disclose as part of its total interest-earning assets in the periods presented.

The following table sets forth the changes in consolidated net interest income attributable to changes in volume and to changes in interest rates.

6 unchanged sentences

Loans held for sale (105) (261) (366) 1,336 (352) 984

Long-term investments (634) (1,061) (1,695) (245) 1,427 1,182

Short term investments 779 (1,392) (613) 79 37 116

Taxable long-term investments 2,064 (2,398) (334) (580) (1,077) (1,657)

Non-taxable long-term investments (38) (26) (64) (143) 105 (38)

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks 170 (32) 138 779 (1,392) (613)

Total interest income $9,277 ($1,387) $7,890 $18,982 ($12,349) $6,633

Interest Expense:

Interest-bearing demand $229 ($367) ($138) $186 ($39) $147

Savings deposits 154 (372) (218) 104 (469) (365)

Money market deposits 125 (415) (290) 51 (485) (434)

Time deposits 25 (1,581) (1,556) 751 219 970

Interest-bearing deposits 1,236 (3,438) (2,202) 763 (445) 318

1 unchanged sentence

Total interest expense $1,265 ($3,537) ($2,272) $772 ($362) $410

Provision for Loan Losses

We recorded a provision for loan losses in 2020 of $2.4 million, compared to a benefit for loan losses of $1.2 million in 2019.

The loan loss provision increased in 2020 compared to 2019 primarily due to an increase in the loan portfolio, excluding loans that are guaranteed by the government, and management's assessment about increased risks in the loan portfolio association with the economic impacts of COVID-19.

See the “Allowance for Loan Losses” section under “Financial Condition” and Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II.

Item 8 of this report for further discussion of these decreases and changes in the Company’s Allowance.

Provision for Credit Losses

The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 effective January 1, 2021.

The provision for credit loss expense is the amount of expense that, based on our judgment, is required to maintain the ACL at an appropriate level under CECL.

The determination of the amount of the ACL is complex and involves a high degree of judgment and subjectivity.

Refer to Note 1 of the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II.

Item 8 of this report for detailed discussion regarding ACL methodologies for loans, available for sale debt securities, held to maturity securities, loans held for investment, unfunded commitments, and purchased receivables.

The following table presents the major categories of credit loss expense:

(In Thousands) 2021 2020

Credit loss expense on loans held for investment ($3,779) $2,432

Credit loss expense on unfunded commitments (320) —

Credit loss expense on available for sale debt securities — —

Credit loss expense on held to maturity securities — —

Credit loss expense on purchased receivables — —

Total credit loss expense ($4,099) $2,432

As noted above, the provision for credit losses was recorded in accordance with CECL in 2021.

The provision for credit losses in 2020, prior to adoption of CECL, was recorded under the incurred loss model.

Despite the fact that a different methodology was used in the calculation of the provision for credit losses in 2021 versus 2020, in general the decrease in the provision for credit losses on loans in 2021 as compared to 2020 is primarily the result of improvement in economic assumptions used to estimate credit losses.

The ongoing impacts of the CECL methodology will be dependent upon changes in economic conditions and forecasts, as well as loan portfolio composition, quality, and duration.

See the “Loans and Lending Activity” section under “Financial Condition” and Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II.

Item 8 of this report for further discussion of these decreases and changes in the Company’s ACL.

Other Operating Income

6 unchanged sentences

Service charges on deposit accounts 1,297 195 18 % 1,102 (455) (29) % 1,557

Merchant fees 561 146 35 % 415 (52) (11) % 467

Interest rate swap income 452 (497) (52) % 949 (15) (2) % 964

6 unchanged sentences

2021 Compared to 2020

The most significant change in other operating income in 2020 was an increase in mortgage banking income which was only partially offset by decreases in gains on marketable equity securities, as well as decreases in purchased receivable income and service charges on deposit accounts.

Mortgage banking income consists of gross income from the origination and sale of mortgages as well as mortgage loan servicing fees and is the largest component of other operating income at 83% of total other operating income in 2020.

Mortgage banking income increased in 2020 compared to 2019 mainly due to an increase in mortgage loans originated and sold as this volume increased to $1.30 billion in 2020 from $684 million in 2019.

The overall increase in mortgage originations in 2020 as compared to the prior year is primarily the result of the decrease in interest rates during the year that led to increased refinance activity.

The Company recognized $61,000 in unrealized gains on marketable equity securities in 2020, an $850,000 decrease as compared to 2019, due to market volatility.

Purchased receivable income and service charges on deposit accounts saw significant decreases as compared to 2019.

Purchased receivable income decreased as customers reportedly used PPP loans to fund liquidity needs, resulting in decreased outstanding purchased receivable balances.

Service charges on deposit accounts decreased due to customer accommodations made by the Company for customers impacted by COVID-19.

The most significant change in other operating income in 2021 was a decrease in mortgage banking income, followed by an increase in bankcard fees and decreases in interest rate swap income and purchased receivable income.

Mortgage banking income decreased in 2021 compared to 2020 mainly due to a decrease in mortgage loans originated and sold as this volume decreased to $1.1 billion in 2021 from $1.3 billion in 2020.

The overall decrease in mortgage originations in 2021 as compared to the prior year is primarily the result of the changes in interest rates during the year that led to decreased refinance activity.

Additionally, there was a $3.7 million decrease in the fair value of the interest rate lock commitments, which is also included in mortgage banking income, due to a decrease in the loan origination pipeline at December 31, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020.

Interest rate swap income decreased in 2021 as compared to 2020 due to a decrease in the origination of new swap contracts with commercial loan customers.

The Company executed new customer swap contracts with a notional value of $15.7 million in 2021 as compared to new customer swap contracts with a notional value of $49.3 million in 2020.

Purchased receivable income decreased in 2021 as compared to 2020 due to customers reportedly using PPP funds instead of selling receivables to fund their operating cash needs.

Bankcard fees and service charges on deposit accounts increased in 2021 due to the cessation of COVID-19 quarantine restrictions, which led to higher transaction volume as compared to 2020, as well as the increase in customers.

Other Operating Expense

8 unchanged sentences

Insurance expense 1,593 365 30 % 1,228 671 120 % 557

Compensation expense - RML acquisition payments — (468) (100) % 468 468 100 % —

Compensation expense - RML acquisition payments — — NM — (468) (100) % 468

Intangible asset amortization 37 (11) (23) % 48 (12) (20) % 60

7 unchanged sentences

2021 Compared to 2020

Other operating expense increased by $12.3 million to $89.1 million in 2020 as compared to $76.8 million in the prior year primarily due to increases in salaries and other personnel expense, as well as smaller increases in insurance expense, professional and outside services, and data processing expense.

These increases were only partially offset by a decrease in compensation expense related to RML acquisition payments.

The fourth quarter of 2019 marked the end of the five-year period following the acquisition of RML during which the Company was required to make additional payments to the former owners of RML when profitability hit certain targets.

Per the terms of the purchase agreement, no further payments are required, and therefore no additional expense for RML acquisition payments will be recorded in the future.

The $9.8 million increase in salaries and other personnel expense in 2020 as compared to 2019 is the result of the following items.

Originator commission expenses increased $5.2 million, or approximately 82% in 2020 compared to 2019 due to increased mortgage production in the home mortgage lending segment.

Additionally, overtime expense increased $1 million, or 309% in 2020 compared to 2019 due to increased mortgage production.

Salaries increased $1.6 million, or 5%, in 2020 as compared to 2019 due to salary increases and an increase in full-time equivalent employees.

Smaller increases also occurred in bonus payments and profit share expense due to the increased mortgage production in the Home Mortgage Lending segment and increased net income for the Community Banking segment.

These increases were only partially offset by a $1.6 million increase in salary deferral related to loan production costs and a $696,000 decrease in group medical insurance expense due to lower medical claims associated with the Company's self-insured employee health benefit plan.

Insurance expense increased $671,000 primarily as a result of increased FDIC insurance costs associated with asset growth.

Professional and outside services increased $626,000 due to costs associated with increased mortgage production volume.

Lastly, data processing expense increased $540,000 in 2020 as compared to 2019 due to costs for improved functionality for digital products and services and the addition of various software applications related to our lending activities.

The provision for income taxes increased $4.1 million or 76%, to $9.6 million in 2020 as compared to 2019.

Other operating expense increased by less than 1% in 2021 as compared to 2020.

The largest increases where in data processing expense, occupancy expense, insurance expense, and marketing expense.

These increases were only mostly offset by decreases in salary and other personnel expense, professional and outside services, and OREO expense.

Data processing expense increased in 2021 compared to 2020 mostly due to increased customer and transaction volume.

Occupancy expense, insurance expense, and marketing expense increased in 2021 as compared to 2020 due to miscellaneous repairs and maintenance and tenant improvements at several of the Company's locations, increased FDIC insurance costs associated with asset growth, and increased marketing expense due to higher giving in the form of increased sponsorship and charitable contributions.

Decreases in salaries and other personnel expense and professional and outside services in 2021 as compared to 2020 are primarily related to mortgage banking operations, which fluctuate with production volumes.

OREO expense decreased in 2021 primarily due to increased gains on sale of OREO properties as compared to 2020.

The provision for income taxes increased $917,000 or 10%, to $10.5 million in 2021 as compared to 2020.

The increase in 2021 is primarily due to higher pretax income.

The Company's effective tax rates were 23% and 21% in 2020 and 2019, respectively.

The changes in the Company's effective tax rates for 2020 and 2019 are primarily due to lower tax-exempt income and fewer low income housing tax credits as a percentage of pre-tax income as compared to 2019.

The Company's effective tax rates were relatively consistent at 21.8% and 22.5% in 2021 and 2020, respectively.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

4 unchanged sentences

Our investment portfolio consists primarily of government sponsored entity securities, corporate securities, collateralized loan obligations, and municipal securities.

Investment securities at December 31, 2020 decreased $17.4 million, or 6%, to $266.7 million from $284.1 million at December 31, 2019.

The decrease at December 31, 2020 as compared to December 31, 2019 is primarily due to proceeds from sales, maturities, and security calls being used for loan fundings.

The average maturity of the investment portfolio was approximately three years at December 31, 2020.

Investment securities at December 31, 2021 increased $188.4 million, or 71%, to $455.1 million from $266.7 million at December 31, 2020.

The increase at December 31, 2021 as compared to December 31, 2020 came from an increase in deposits that were not lent out were invested.

The average maturity of the investment portfolio was approximately four years at December 31, 2021.

Investment securities may be pledged as collateral to secure public deposits or borrowings.

At December 31, 2021 and 2020, $59.5 million and $77.9 million in securities were pledged for deposits and borrowings, respectively.

Pledged securities increased at December 31, 2020 as compared to December 31, 2019 primarily due to increased pledges to the FHLB to increase the Company's immediate borrowing capacity at December 31, 2020.

Pledged securities decreased at December 31, 2021 as compared to December 31, 2020 primarily due to decreased pledges to the FHLB to support the Company's immediate borrowing capacity at December 31, 2021.

The following tables set forth the composition of our investment portfolio at December 31 for the years indicated:

27 unchanged sentences

Corporate Bonds $10,000 $10,000

Total $10,000 $10,000

Corporate Bonds $— $—

5 unchanged sentences

Weighted average yield (1)

2.80 % 0.79 % — % — % 0.82 %

Municipal securities

1 unchanged sentence

Weighted average yield (1)

— % 2.14 % — % — % 2.14 %

Corporate bonds

1 unchanged sentence

Weighted average yield (1)

— % 1.29 % 1.50 % — % 1.33 %

Collateralized loan obligations

1 unchanged sentence

Weighted average yield (1)

— % 1.65 % 1.39 % — % 1.42 %

Balance $5,041 $370,272 $51,371 $— $426,684

Weighted average yield (1)

Security Held to Maturity

2.80 % 0.84 % 1.40 % — % 0.93 %

Securities Held to Maturity

Corporate bonds

1 unchanged sentence

Weighted average yield (1)

— % 5.50 % 5.00 % — % 5.25 %

Marketable Equity Securities

2 unchanged sentences

Weighted average yield (1)

— % — % — % 5.57 % 5.57 %

(1) Weighted average yields have been calculated on an amortized cost basis and not on a tax-equivalent basis.

The Company’s investment in marketable equity securities does not have a maturity date but it has been included in the over 10 years column above.

At December 31, 2020, we held no securities of any single issuer (other than government sponsored entities) that exceeded 10% of our shareholders’ equity.

Our loan products include short and medium-term commercial loans, commercial credit lines, construction and real estate loans, and consumer loans.

To a lesser extent, through our wholly-owned subsidiary RML, we also originate mortgage loans which we sell to the secondary market.

We retain servicing rights on mortgage loans originated by RML and sold to the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation ("AHFC").

We emphasize providing financial services to small and medium-sized businesses and to individuals.

From our inception, we have emphasized commercial, land development and home construction, and commercial real estate lending.

These types of lending have provided us with needed market opportunities and generally provide higher net interest margins compared to other types of lending such as consumer lending.

However, they also involve greater risks, including greater exposure to changes in local economic conditions.

Additionally in 2020, we originated a significant amount of PPP loans and we expect to originate additional PPP loans in 2021.

Loans and Lending Activities

All of our loans and credit lines are subject to approval procedures and amount limitations.

1 unchanged sentence

Generally, we are permitted to make loans to one borrower of up to 15% of the unimpaired capital and surplus of the Bank.

The loan-to-one-borrower limitation for the Bank was $29.9 million at December 31, 2020.

At December 31, 2020, the Company had three relationships whose total direct and indirect commitments exceeded $29.9 million;

The legal lending limit for the Bank was $30.2 million at December 31, 2021.

At December 31, 2021, the Company had two relationships whose total direct and indirect commitments exceeded $30.2 million;

however, no individual direct relationship exceeded the loans-to-one borrower limitation.

See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations – Provision for Loan Losses” for further discussion of the Company's concentration of loans to large borrowers.

Our lending operations are guided by loan policies, which outline the basic policies and procedures by which lending operations are conducted.

Generally, the policies address our desired loan types, target markets, underwriting and collateral requirements, terms, interest rate and yield considerations, and compliance with laws and regulations.

The policies are reviewed and approved annually by the board of directors of the Bank.

Our Quality Assurance Department provides a detailed financial analysis of our largest, most complex loans.

In addition, the Quality Assurance Department, along with the Chief Credit Officer of the Bank, have developed processes to analyze and manage various concentrations of credit within the overall loan portfolio.

The Credit Administration Department monitors the procedures and processes for both the analysis and reporting of problem loans, and also develops strategies to resolve problem loans based on the facts and circumstances for each loan.

Finally, our Internal Audit Department also performs an independent review of each loan portfolio for compliance with loan policy as well as a review of credit quality.

The Internal Audit review follows the FDIC sampling guidelines, and a review of each portfolio is performed on an annual basis.

The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio by loan segment:

December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016

Dollar Amount Percent of Total Dollar Amount Percent of Total Dollar Amount Percent of Total Dollar Amount Percent of Total Dollar Amount Percent of Total

The Company's loans have grown significantly in recent history, in part due to PPP loans, but over the last 3 years, non-PPP loans have also increased significantly.

Management attributes higher growth in loans, excluding PPP loans, in 2021 and 2020 to our ability to attract new customers through our outreach to the community.

The Company's "Land and Expand" program was designed to increase both loans and deposits as we attract a broader customer base and convert new PPP customers into full banking relationships.

The following table presents growth information for loans and loans excluding PPP loans:

Years Ended December 31,

(In Thousands) 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Five Year Compound Growth Rate

Loans $1,413,886 $1,444,050 $1,043,371 $984,346 $954,953 $974,074 8 %

PPP loans 118,229 304,587 — — — — NM

Loans, excluding PPP loans $1,295,657 $1,139,463 $1,043,371 $984,346 $954,953 $974,074 6 %

Percent change, Loans excluding PPP loans 14 % 9 % 6 % 3 % (2) %

The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio by loan segment as of the dates indicated:

December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020

Dollar Amount Percent of Total Dollar Amount Percent of Total

(In Thousands)

Commercial $780,058 54.0 % $412,690 39.5 % $342,420 34.8 % $313,514 32.8 % $277,802 28.5 %

Real estate construction one-to-four family 38,467 2.7 % 38,818 3.7 % 37,111 3.8 % 31,201 3.3 % 26,061 2.7 %

Real estate construction other 80,315 5.6 % 61,808 5.9 % 72,256 7.3 % 80,093 8.4 % 72,159 7.4 %

Real estate term owner occupied 163,597 11.3 % 138,891 13.3 % 126,414 12.8 % 132,042 13.8 % 152,112 15.6 %

Real estate term non-owner occupied 309,074 21.4 % 312,960 30.0 % 325,720 33.1 % 319,313 33.4 % 356,411 36.6 %

Real estate term other 46,620 3.2 % 42,506 4.1 % 42,039 4.3 % 40,411 4.2 % 45,402 4.7 %

Consumer secured by 1st deeds of trust 15,585 1.1 % 16,198 1.6 % 19,228 2.0 % 22,616 2.4 % 23,280 2.4 %

Consumer other 22,069 1.5 % 24,585 2.4 % 23,645 2.4 % 19,919 2.1 % 25,281 2.6 %

Subtotal $1,455,785 $1,048,456 $988,833 $959,109 $978,508

Unearned origination fee,

net of origination costs (11,735) (0.8) % (5,085) (0.5) % (4,487) (0.5) % (4,156) (0.4) % (4,434) (0.5) %

Total portfolio loans $1,444,050 $1,043,371 $984,346 $954,953 $974,074

Commercial Loans:

Our commercial loan portfolio includes both secured and unsecured loans for working capital and expansion.

Short-term working capital loans generally are secured by accounts receivable, inventory, or equipment.

We also make longer-term commercial loans secured by equipment and real estate.

We also make commercial loans that are guaranteed in large part by the SBA or the Bureau of Indian Affairs and to a lesser extent guaranteed by the United States Department of Agriculture, as well as commercial real estate loans that are purchased by the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority (“AIDEA”).

Commercial loans increased to $780.1 million at December 31, 2020 from $412.7 million at December 31, 2019 and represented approximately 54% and 40% of our total loans outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

The increase in commercial loans at the end of 2020 is primarily due to $310.5 million in PPP loans.

The Company originated $375.6 million PPP loans in 2020.

As of December 31, 2020, $65.1 million in PPP loans had been forgiven by the SBA.

Commercial loans reprice more frequently than other types of loans, such as real estate loans.

More frequent repricing means that interest cash flows from commercial loans are more sensitive to changes in interest rates.

In a rising interest rate environment, our philosophy is to emphasize the pricing of loans on a floating rate basis, which allows these loans to reprice more frequently and to contribute positively to our net interest margin.

Commercial & industrial loans $448,338 31.7 % $612,254 42.2 %

Commercial real estate:

We are an active lender in the commercial real estate market.

At December 31, 2020, commercial real estate loans increased to $519.3 million from $494.4 million at December 31, 2019, and represented approximately 36% and 47% of our loan portfolio as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

These loans are typically secured by office buildings, apartment complexes or warehouses.

Loan amortization periods range from 10 to 25 years and generally have a maximum maturity of 10 years.

We may sell all or a portion of a commercial real estate loan to two State of Alaska entities, AIDEA and AHFC, which were both established to provide long-term financing in the State of Alaska.

The loans that AIDEA purchases typically feature a maturity twice that of the loans retained by us and bear a lower interest rate.

The blend of our and AIDEA’s loan terms allows

us to provide competitive long-term financing to our customers, while reducing the risk inherent in this type of lending.

We also originate and sell to AHFC loans secured by multifamily residential units.

Typically, 100% of these loans are sold to AHFC and we provide ongoing servicing of the loans for a fee.

AIDEA and AHFC make it possible for us to originate these commercial real estate loans and enhance fee income while reducing our exposure to interest rate risk.

Construction Loans:

We provide construction lending for commercial real estate projects.

Such loans generally are made only when the Company has also committed to finance the completed project with a commercial real estate loan, or if there is a firm take-out commitment upon completion of the project by a third party lender.

Additionally, we provide land development and residential subdivision construction loans.

We also originate one-to-four-family residential and condominium construction loans to builders for construction of homes.

The Company’s construction loans increased in 2020 to $118.8 million, up from $100.6 million in 2019, and represented approximately 8% and 10% of our loan portfolio in December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

As of December 31, 2020, approximately $6.0 million or 5%, of the Company's construction loans were for low income housing tax credit projects as compared to $24.0 million or 24% as of December 31, 2019.

Owner occupied properties 300,200 21.2 % 233,320 16.2 %

Non-owner occupied and multifamily properties 435,311 30.8 % 392,452 27.2 %

Residential real estate:

1-4 family residential properties secured by first liens 32,542 2.3 % 33,415 2.3 %

1-4 family residential properties secured by junior liens and revolving secured by 1-4 family first liens 19,610 1.4 % 18,236 1.3 %

1-4 family residential construction loans 36,222 2.6 % 32,500 2.3 %

Other construction, land development and raw land loans 88,094 6.2 % 83,463 5.8 %

Obligations of states and political subdivisions in the US 16,403 1.2 % 15,318 1.1 %

Agricultural production, including commercial fishing 27,959 2.0 % 12,968 0.9 %

Consumer loans 4,801 0.3 % 5,734 0.4 %

We provide personal loans for automobiles, recreational vehicles, boats, and other larger consumer purchases.

We provide both secured and unsecured consumer credit lines to accommodate the needs of our individual customers, with home equity lines of credit serving as the major product in this area.

Other loans 4,406 0.3 % 4,390 0.3 %

Total portfolio loans $1,413,886 $1,444,050

The following table presents the maturity distribution of our loan portfolio and the rate sensitivity of these loans to changes in interest rates as of December 31, 2021:

By Maturity Loans Over One Year By Rate Sensitivity

(In Thousands) Within 1 Year 1-5 Years 5-15 Years Over 15 Years Total Fixed Interest Rate Floating Interest Rate

Commercial & industrial loans $92,622 $242,076 $113,054 $— $447,752 $219,834 $135,296

Commercial real estate 43,627 125,032 491,692 79,952 740,303 180,555 516,121

Residential real estate 41,142 5,228 18,803 21,103 86,276 19,862 25,272

Other construction 44,549 19,692 17,534 2,076 83,851 13,980 25,322

Consumer and other 7,631 9,320 38,743 10 55,704 12,726 35,347

Total $229,571 $401,348 $679,826 $103,141 $1,413,886 $446,957 $737,358

Loans Directly Exposed to the Oil and Gas Industry:

4 unchanged sentences

The Company's unfunded commitments to borrowers that have direct exposure to the oil and gas industry were $66.4 million and $63.5 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

The portion of the Company's allowance for loan losses that related to the loans with direct exposure to the oil and gas industry was estimated at $1.2 million and $1.6 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

The following table details loan balances by loan segment asset quality rating ("AQR") and class of financing receivable for loans with direct oil and gas exposure as of the dates indicated:

(In Thousands) Commercial Real estate construction one-to-four family Real estate construction other Real estate term owner occupied Real estate term non-owner occupied Real estate term other Consumer secured by 1st deeds of trust Consumer other Total

December 31, 2020

AQR Pass $46,943 $— $— $4,023 $— $— $— $— $50,966

AQR Special Mention 4,597 — — 1,541 6,606 — — — 12,744

AQR Substandard 1,412 — — — — — — — 1,412

Total loans $52,952 $— $— $5,564 $6,606 $— $— $— $65,122

December 31, 2019

AQR Pass $62,345 $— $— $4,153 $— $— $— $361 $66,859

AQR Special Mention 450 — — 1,900 6,916 — — — 9,266

AQR Substandard 3,070 — — — — — — — 3,070

The portion of the Company's allowance for loan losses that related to the loans with direct exposure to the oil and gas industry was estimated at $684,000 and $1.2 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

The following table details loan balances by loan segment and class of financing receivable for loans with direct oil and gas exposure as of the dates indicated:

(In Thousands) December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020

Commercial & industrial loans $45,338 $41,016

Commercial real estate:

Owner occupied properties 10,244 11,296

Non-owner occupied and multifamily properties 6,564 6,606

Consumer loans — 2,256

Other loans 1,495 3,948

Total loans $63,641 $65,122

Supplemental information about significant COVID-19 exposure on directly impacted industries:

In addition, at December 31, 2020, the Company had $78.9 million, or 5% of portfolio loans, in the tourism sector, $56.1 million, or 4% of portfolio loans, in the aviation (non-tourism) sector, $96.9 million, or 7% of total loans, in the healthcare sector, $17.4 million, or 1%, in retail loans and $31.0 million, or 2% in the restaurant sector, and $37.2 million, or 3% in the accommodations sector.

At December 31, 2020, the Company had $78.9 million, or 7% of portfolio loans excluding PPP loans, in the tourism sector, $56.1 million, or 5% of portfolio loans excluding PPP loans, in the aviation (non-tourism) sector, $96.9 million, or 8% of total loans excluding PPP loans, in the healthcare sector, $17.4 million, or 2% of total loans excluding PPP loans, in retail loans and $31.0 million, or 3% of total loans excluding PPP loans in the restaurant sector, and $37.2 million, or 3% of total loans excluding PPP loans in the accommodations sector.The portion of the Company's Allowance that related to the loans with exposure to these industries is estimated at the following amounts as of December 31, 2020:

(In Thousands) Tourism Aviation (non-tourism) Healthcare Retail Restaurant Accommodations Total

Allowance $1,481 $1,049 $1,758 $309 $581 $695 $5,873

Maturities and Sensitivities of Loans to Change in Interest Rates:

The following table presents the aggregate maturity data of our loan portfolio, excluding loans held for sale, at December 31, 2020:

(In Thousands) Within 1 Year 1-5 Years Over 5 Years Total

Commercial $133,528 $418,031 $228,499 $780,058

Real estate construction one-to-four family 36,673 1,794 — 38,467

Real estate construction other 40,665 5,439 34,211 80,315

Real estate term owner occupied 7,344 30,579 125,674 163,597

Real estate term non-owner occupied 10,073 78,453 220,548 309,074

Real estate term other 9,283 10,322 27,015 46,620

Consumer secured by 1st deeds of trust 208 834 14,543 15,585

Consumer other 1,196 4,330 16,543 22,069

Total $238,970 $549,782 $667,033 $1,455,785

Fixed interest rate $92,040 $391,531 $175,677 $659,248

Floating interest rate 146,930 158,251 491,356 796,537

Total $238,970 $549,782 $667,033 $1,455,785

At December 31, 2020, 59% of the portfolio was scheduled to mature or reprice in 2021 with 36% scheduled to mature or reprice between 2022 and 2025.

As of December 31, 2020, approximately 44% of commercial loans are variable rate loans, of which 57% reprice within one year.

Approximately 38% of variable rate commercial loans reprice to an index based upon the prime rate of interest, 30% reprice based the respective Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (the "Boston FHLB") rate, and 29% reprice based on one-month LIBOR.

The Company also uses floors in its commercial loan pricing as loans are originated or renewed during the year.

At December 31, 2020, the interest rates for approximately 85% of commercial real estate loans are variable, of which 41% reset within one year.

Approximately 38% of commercial real estate variable rate loans reprice in greater than one year but within three years.

The indices for these loans include the prime rate of interest or the respective Treasury or FHLB-Boston rate.

The Company also uses floors in its commercial real estate loan pricing as loans are originated or renewed during the year.

Loans Held for Sale and Mortgage Servicing Rights ("MSRs"):

The Company originates residential mortgage loans and sells them in the secondary market through our wholly-owned subsidiary, RML.

All residential mortgage loans originated and sold in 2020 and 2019 were newly originated loans that did not affect nonperforming loans.

The Company also has a mortgage servicing portfolio which is comprised of 1-4 family loans serviced for Freddie Mac Home Loan Corporation ("FHLMC") and AHFC.

The Company retains servicing rights on all mortgage loans originated by RML and sold to AHFC.

Mortgages originated by RML and sold to AHFC represented approximately 16% and 23% of the mortgages originated by RML in 2020 and 2019, respectively.

MSRs are adjusted to fair value quarterly with the change recorded in mortgage banking income.

value of MSRs at December 31, 2020 and 2019 were $11.2 million and $11.9 million, respectively.

The value of MSRs is impacted by market rates for mortgage loans primarily due to how changes in interest rates affect prepayments of mortgage loans.

To the extent loans are prepaid sooner than estimated at the time servicing assets are originally recorded, it is possible that certain residential MSR assets may decrease in value.

Generally, the fair value of our residential MSRs is expected to increase as market rates for mortgage loans rise and decrease if market rates fall.

Credit Quality and Nonperforming Assets

Nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans, accruing loans that are 90 days or more past due, repossessed assets and OREO.

The following table sets forth information regarding our nonperforming loans and total nonperforming assets:

December 31, December 31,

(In Thousands) 2021 2020

Nonperforming loans

Nonaccrual loans $11,650 $11,120

Loans 90 days past due and accruing — 449

Government guarantees on nonperforming loans (1,521) (1,405) (516) (467) (1,413)

Total nonperforming loans 11,650 11,569

Nonperforming loans guaranteed by government (978) (1,521)

Net nonperforming loans 10,672 10,048

3 unchanged sentences

Net nonperforming assets $15,031 $16,289

Nonperforming loans, net of government guarantees

to portfolio loans 0.70 % 1.34 % 1.49 % 2.24 % 1.33 %

Nonperforming assets, net of government guarantees to total assets 0.77 % 1.21 % 1.50 % 1.89 % 1.27 %

Performing restructured loans, net of government guarantees $832 $1,448 $3,413 $7,668 $6,131

Nonperforming loans, net of government guarantees / portfolio loans 0.75 % 0.70 %

Nonperforming loans, net of government guarantees / portfolio loans, net of government guarantees 0.88 % 0.92 %

Nonperforming assets, net of government guarantees / total assets 0.55 % 0.77 %

Nonperforming assets, net of government guarantees / total assets net of government guarantees 0.60 % 0.92 %

Performing restructured loans $3,291 $2,355

Performing restructured loans guaranteed by government (2,518) (1,523)

Net performing restructured loans $773 $832

Nonperforming loans plus performing restructured loans, net of government guarantees $11,445 $10,880

Nonperforming loans plus performing restructured loans, net of government guarantees to portfolio loans 0.75 % 1.48 % 1.84 % 3.05 % 1.96 %

Nonperforming assets plus performing restructured loans, net of government guarantees to total assets 0.81 % 1.30 % 1.73 % 2.40 % 1.67 %

Nonperforming loans plus performing restructured loans, net of government

guarantees / portfolio loans 0.81 % 0.75 %

Nonperforming loans plus performing restructured loans, net of government

guarantees / portfolio loans, net of government guarantees 0.94 % 0.99 %

Nonperforming assets plus performing restructured loans, net of government

guarantees / total assets 0.58 % 0.81 %

Nonperforming assets plus performing restructured loans, net of government

guarantees / total assets, net of government guarantees 0.63 % 0.97 %

Adversely classified loans, net of government guarantees $13,739 $12,768

Loans 30-89 days past due and accruing, net of government guarantees to portfolio loans 0.05 % 0.15 % 0.36 % 0.22 % 0.22 %

Allowance for loan losses to portfolio loans 1.46 % 1.83 % 1.98 % 2.25 % 2.02 %

Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans, net of government guarantees 210 % 137 % 133 % 100 % 152 %

The Company’s nonperforming loans, net of government guarantees decreased in 2020 to $10.0 million as compared to $14.0 million in 2019.

This decrease was mostly due to a large nonaccrual loan payoff, as well as principal paydowns and charge-offs on nonaccrual loans in 2020.

There was interest income of $924,000 and $301,000 recognized in net income for 2020 and 2019, respectively, related to interest collected on nonaccrual loans whose principal has been paid down to zero.

The Company had four relationships that each represented more than 10% of nonaccrual loans as of December 31, 2020.

The Company had $832,000 and $1.4 million in loans classified as troubled debt restructuring loans ("TDRs"), net of government guarantees that were performing as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Special mention loans, net of government guarantees $22,110 $19,063

Loans 30-89 days past due and accruing, net of government guarantees /portfolio loans — 0.05 %

Loans 30-89 days past due and accruing, net of government guarantees /

portfolio loans, net of government guarantees — 0.07 %

Allowance for credit losses / portfolio loans 0.83 % 1.46 %

Allowance for credit losses / portfolio loans, net of government guarantees 0.97 % 1.93 %

Allowance for credit losses / nonperforming loans, net of government

guarantees 110 % 210 %

Gross loan charge-offs for the quarter $1,179 $11

Gross loan recoveries for the quarter ($53) $64

Net loan (recoveries) charge-offs for the quarter $1,126 ($53)

Net loan (recoveries) charge-offs year-to-date $1,107 $384

Net loan (recoveries) charge-offs for the quarter / average loans, for the quarter 0.08 % — %

Net loan (recoveries) charge-offs year-to-date / average loans,

year-to-date annualized 0.07 % 0.03 %

The Company’s nonperforming loans, net of government guarantees increased in 2021 to $10.7 million as compared to $10.0 million in 2020.

This increase was mostly due to several additions to nonaccrual loans which were only partially offset by principal paydowns and charge-offs on nonaccrual loans in 2021.

There was interest income of $1.6 million and $924,000 recognized in net income for 2021 and 2020, respectively, related to interest collected on nonaccrual loans whose principal has been paid down to zero.

The Company had three relationships that each represented more than 10% of nonaccrual loans as of December 31, 2021.

The Company had $773,000 and $832,000 in loans classified as TDRs, net of government guarantees that were performing as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Additionally, there were $6.5 million and $5.5 million in TDRs included in nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2021 and 2020 for total TDRs, net of government guarantees of $7.3 million and $5.3 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

The decrease in TDRs at December 31, 2020 as compared to 2019 was primarily due to payoffs and paydowns on loans classified as TDRs that were only partially offset by additions to TDRs in 2020.

The increase in TDRs at December 31, 2021 as compared to 2020 was primarily due additions to TDRs that were only partially offset by payoffs and paydowns on loans classified as TDRs in 2021.

See Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II.

2 unchanged sentences

Potential problem loans are loans which are currently performing that have developed negative indications that the borrower may not be able to comply with present payment terms and which may later be included in nonaccrual, past due, or impaired loans.

The $2.9 million decrease in potential problem loans at December 31, 2020 from December 31, 2019 was primarily due to paydowns and additional government guarantees that were partially offset by the addition of new potential problem loans in 2020.

The Company acquired other assets consisting of aircraft totaling $1.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2018 through foreclosure proceedings related to one lending relationship.

These assets were sold in the third quarter of 2019.

The Company acquired a vessel totaling $231,000 in the third quarter of 2019 through foreclosure proceedings related to one lending relationship that is still held as of the end of 2020.

The $4.0 million decrease in potential problem loans at December 31, 2021 from December 31, 2020 was primarily the result of one $3.9 million relationship moving to nonaccrual as well as paydowns and credit risk upgrades to existing potential problem loans that were partially offset by the addition of new potential problem loans in 2021.

The Company acquired a vessel totaling $231,000 in the third quarter of 2019 through foreclosure proceedings related to one lending relationship that was sold in the second quarter of 2021.

The following summarizes OREO activity for the periods indicated:

2 unchanged sentences

Transfers from loans 274 652 —

Investment in other real estate owned — — 144

Proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned (2,610) (797) (1,299)

Gain on sale of other real estate owned, net 685 391 380

Impairment on other real estate owned — — —

Balance, end of year 5,638 7,289 7,043

1 unchanged sentence

Balance, end of year, net of government guarantees $4,359 $6,010 $5,764

At December 31, 2020 and 2019 the Company held $6.0 million and $5.8 million, respectively, of OREO assets, net of government guarantees.

At December 31, 2020, OREO consists of $1.2 million in residential lots in various stages of development, a $5.6 million commercial building, and $490,000 of undeveloped land.

All OREO property is located in Alaska.

The Bank initiates foreclosure proceedings to recover and sell collateral pledged by a debtor to secure a loan based on various events of default and circumstances related to loans that are secured by either commercial or residential real property.

These events and circumstances include delinquencies, the Company’s relationship with the borrower, and the borrower’s ability to repay the loan via a source other than the collateral.

If the loan has not yet matured, the debtors may cure the events of default up to the time of sale to retain their interest in the collateral.

Failure to cure the defaults will result in the debtor losing ownership interest in the property, which is taken by the creditor, or high bidder at a foreclosure sale.

During 2020, the Company transferred two loans to OREO totaling $652,000.

During 2020, the Company received approximately $797,000 in proceeds from the sale of OREO.

The Company recognized $391,000 and $380,000 in gains and no losses on the sale of OREO properties in 2020 and 2019, respectively.

The Company had remaining accumulated deferred gains on the sale of OREO properties of $123,000 and $231,000 at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

The Company did not make any loans to facilitate the sale of OREO in 2020 or 2019.

The Company made a $1.0 million loan in 2021 to facilitate the sale of OREO in 2021, but did not make any loans to facilitate the sale of OREO in 2020.

Our underwriting policies and procedures for loans to facilitate the sale of OREO are no different than our standard loan policies and procedures.

The Company recognized impairments of zero in both 2020 and 2019 due to adjustments to the Company’s estimate of the fair value of certain properties based on changes in estimated costs to complete the projects, decrease in expected sales prices, and changes in the Anchorage and the Southeastern Alaska real estate markets.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The Company maintains an Allowance to reflect management's assessment of probable, estimable losses inherent in the loan portfolio.

The Allowance is increased by provisions for loan losses and loan recoveries and decreased by loan charge-offs.

The size of the Allowance is determined through quarterly assessments of probable estimated losses in the loan portfolio.

Our methodology for making such assessments and determining the adequacy of the Allowance includes the following key elements:

• A specific allocation for impaired loans.

Management determines the fair value of the majority of these loans based on the underlying collateral values.

This analysis is based upon a specific analysis for each impaired loan, including external appraisals on loans secured by real property, management’s assessment of the current market, recent payment history, and an evaluation of other sources of repayment.

In-house evaluations of fair value are used in the impairment analysis in some situations.

Inputs to the in-house evaluation process include information about sales of comparable properties in the appropriate markets and changes in tax assessed values.

The Company obtains appraisals on real and personal property that secure its loans during the loan origination process in accordance with regulatory guidance and its loan policy.

Appraisals may be adjusted downward by the Company based on its evaluation of the facts and circumstances on a case by case basis.

External appraisals may be discounted when management believes that the absorption period used in the appraisal is unrealistic, when expected liquidation costs exceed those included in the appraisal, or when management’s evaluation of deteriorating market conditions warrants an adjustment.

Additionally, the Company may also adjust appraisals in the above circumstances between appraisal dates.

The specific allowance for impaired loans, as well as the overall Allowance, may increase based on the Company’s assessment of updated appraisals.

See Note 26 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II.

Item 8 of this report for further discussion of the Company’s estimation of impaired loans measured at fair value.

When the Company determines that a loss has occurred on an impaired loan, a charge-off equal to the difference between carrying value and fair value is recorded.

If a specific allowance is deemed necessary for a loan, and then that loan is partially charged off, the loan remains classified as a nonperforming loan after the charge-off is recognized.

• A general allocation - The Company has identified segments and classes of loans not considered impaired for purposes of establishing the general allocation allowance.

The Company disaggregates the loan portfolio into segments and classes based on its assessment of how different pools of loans with like characteristics in the portfolio behave over time.

This determination is based on historical experience and management’s assessment of how current facts and circumstances are expected to affect the loan portfolio.

The Company first disaggregates the loan portfolio into the following eight segments:

commercial, real estate construction one-to-four family, real estate construction other, real estate term owner occupied, real estate term non-owner occupied, real estate term other, consumer secured by first deeds of trust, and other consumer loans.

After division of the loan portfolio into segments, the Company then further disaggregates each of the segments into classes.

The Company has a total of five classes, which are based off of the Company's loan risk grading system known as the Asset Quality Rating (“AQR”) system.

The risk ratings are discussed in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II.

Item 8 of this report.

There are five loan classes:

pass (pass AQR grades, which are grades 1 – 6), special mention, substandard, doubtful, and loss.

There have been no changes to these loan classes in 2020.

After the portfolio has been disaggregated into segments and classes, the Company calculates a general reserve for each segment and class based on the average loss history for each segment and class.

The Company utilizes a look-back period of five years in the calculation of average historical loss rates.

After the Company calculates a general allocation using our loss history, the general reserve is then adjusted for qualitative factors by segment and class.

Qualitative factors are based on management’s assessment of current trends that may cause losses inherent in the current loan portfolio to differ significantly from historical losses.

Some factors that management considers in determining the qualitative adjustment to the general reserve include our concentration of large borrowers;

national and local economic trends;

general business conditions;

trends in local real estate markets;

economic, political, and industry specific factors that affect resource development in Alaska;

effects of various political activities;

peer group data;

and internal factors such as underwriting policies and expertise of the Company’s employees.

• An unallocated reserve - The unallocated portion of the Allowance provides for other credit losses inherent in our loan portfolio that may not have been contemplated in the specific and general components of the Allowance, and

it acknowledges the inherent imprecision of all loss prediction models.

The unallocated component is reviewed periodically based on trends in credit losses and overall economic conditions.

At December 31, 2020 and 2019, the unallocated allowance as a percentage of the total Allowance was 10% and 11%, respectively.

The following table shows the allocation of the Allowance for the years indicated:

2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

% of Loans (1)

Allowance for Credit Losses

The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 effective January 1, 2021.

The determination of the amount of the ACL is complex and involves a high degree of judgment and subjectivity.

Refer to Note 1 of the notes to Consolidated Financial

Statements included in Part II.

Item 8 of this report for detailed discussion regarding the ACL methodology for loans and unfunded commitments.

The following tables show the allocation of the ACL and the percent of loans in each category to total loans and the ratio of net loan charge-offs to average loans outstanding by loan segment for the years indicated:

% of Loans (1)

Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans

(In Thousands) Amount

Commercial & industrial loans $3,027 33 % 0.21 %

Commercial real estate:

Owner occupied properties 3,176 21 % — %

Non-owner occupied and multifamily properties 2,930 31 % — %

Residential real estate:

1-4 family residential properties secured by first liens 439 2 % — %

1-4 family residential properties secured by junior liens and revolving secured by 1-4 family first liens 215 1 % (0.21) %

1-4 family residential construction loans 120 3 % — %

Other construction, land development and raw land loans 1,635 6 % — %

Obligations of states and political subdivisions in the US 32 1 % — %

Agricultural production, including commercial fishing 91 2 % (0.15) %

Consumer loans 67 — % (0.27) %

Other loans 7 — % — %

Total $11,739 100 % 0.07 %

1 Represents percentage of this category of loans to total portfolio loans.

% of Loans (1)

(In Thousands) Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount

Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans

(In Thousands) Amount

Commercial $7,973 39 % 0.04 %

4 unchanged sentences

Real estate term other 779 3 % — %

Consumer secured by 1st deeds of trust 261 1 % 270 2 % 306 2 % 315 2 % 313 2 %

Consumer secured by 1st deed of trust 261 1 % — %

Consumer other 400 2 % (0.04) %

2 unchanged sentences

1 Represents percentage of this category of loans to total portfolio loans.

The following table sets forth information regarding changes in our Allowance for the years indicated:

(In Thousands) 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Balance at beginning of year $19,088 $19,519 $21,461 $19,697 $18,153

Commercial (1,021) (195) (1,716) (1,611) (903)

Real estate construction one-to-four family — — — — (535)

Real estate term owner occupied (85) — — — —

Real estate term other — — (28) (5) —

Consumer secured by 1st deeds of trust — (4) (143) (85) (36)

Consumer other (15) (18) (39) (43) (8)

Total charge-offs (1,121) (217) (1,926) (1,744) (1,482)

Commercial 710 908 442 293 699

Real estate term other 2 28 3 2 —

Consumer secured by 1st deeds of trust — — 12 2 —

Consumer other 25 25 27 11 29

Total recoveries 737 961 484 308 728

Net, (charge-offs) recoveries (384) 744 (1,442) (1,436) (754)

Provision (benefit) for loan losses 2,432 (1,175) (500) 3,200 2,298

Balance at end of year $21,136 $19,088 $19,519 $21,461 $19,697

Ratio of net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans

outstanding during the period 0.03 % (0.07) % 0.15 % 0.15 % 0.08 %

In accordance with GAAP, loans acquired in connection with our acquisition of Alaska Pacific on April 1, 2014 were recorded at their fair value at the acquisition date.

Credit discounts were included in the determination of fair value;

therefore, an allowance for loan losses was not recorded at the acquisition date.

Purchased credit impaired loans were evaluated on a loan by loan basis and the valuation allowance for these loans was netted against the carrying value.

Loans acquired from Alaska Pacific have been classified as impaired loans and evaluated for specific impairment using the same methodology as all other

loans since April 1, 2014.

A general allowance for loans acquired from Alaska Pacific was established if there was deterioration in credit quality of the acquired loans subsequent to acquisition from April 1, 2014 through December 31, 2017.

As of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, loans acquired from Alaska Pacific are included in the Company's general allowance using the same methodology as all other loans as described above due to the amount of time that has passed since the loans were purchased.

There was no specific impairment on acquired loans at December 31, 2020 or 2019.

The purchase discount related to acquired credit impaired loans was $328,000 and $345,000 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

The provision for loan losses in 2020 as compared to 2019 increased $3.6 million to provision for loan losses of $$2.4 million compared to a benefit of $1.2 million in 2019.

As of December 31, 2021, and 2020, loans acquired in connection with our acquisition of Alaska Pacific on April 1, 2014 are included in the Company's ACL using the same methodology as all other loans as described in Note 1 of the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II.

Item 8 of this report due to the amount of time that has passed since the loans were purchased.

The purchase discount related to acquired credit impaired loans was zero and $328,000 as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

The provision for credit losses in 2021 as compared to 2020 decreased $6.5 million to a benefit for credit losses of $4.1 million compared to a provision of $2.4 million in 2020.

This decrease is primarily due to improvement in economic assumptions.

The Company determined that an ACL of $11.7 million, or 0.83% of portfolio loans, is appropriate as of December 31, 2021 based on our analysis of the current credit quality of the portfolio and current economic conditions.

The provision for credit losses in 2020 as compared to 2019 increased $3.6 million to a provision for credit losses of $2.4 million compared to a benefit of $1.2 million in 2019.

This increase is primarily due to management's assessment of risk associated with the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the reduction in oil prices and a slowing Alaska economy, as well as growth in the unguaranteed portion of the loan portfolio.

The Company determined that an Allowance of $21.1 million, or 1.46% of portfolio loans, is appropriate as of December 31, 2020 based on our analysis of the current credit quality of the portfolio and current economic conditions.

The provision for loan losses in 2019 as compared to 2018 decreased $675,000 to a benefit of $1.2 million compared to a benefit of $500,000 in 2018.

This decrease is primarily due to net recoveries on loans and a decrease in qualitative factors mostly due to strengthening in the Alaska economy in 2019.

The provision for loan losses in 2018 as compared to 2017 decreased $3.7 million to a benefit of $500,000 compared to a provision of $3.2 million in 2017.

This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in nonperforming loans and the portion of the Allowance specific to impaired loans.

The provision for loan losses in 2017 as compared to 2016 increased $902,000 to $3.2 million compared to $2.3 million in 2016.

This increase was primarily due to an increase in nonperforming loans and the portion of the Allowance specific to impaired loans.

While management believes that it uses the best information available to determine the Allowance, unforeseen market conditions and other events could result in an adjustment to the Allowance, and net income could be significantly affected if circumstances differed substantially from the assumptions used in making the final determination of the Allowance.

As noted above, the ACL was recorded in accordance with CECL in 2021.

The allowance for loan losses in 2020, prior to adoption of CECL, was recorded under the incurred loss model.

Despite the fact that a different methodology was used in the calculation of the provision for credit losses in 2021 versus 2020, in general the decrease in the ACL on loans as of December 31, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020 is primarily the result of improvement in economic assumptions used to estimate credit losses following the economy's recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic.

The ongoing impacts of the CECL methodology will be dependent upon changes in economic conditions and forecasts, as well as loan portfolio composition, quality, and duration.

The following table sets forth information regarding changes in the ACL for unfunded commitments for the years indicated:

(In Thousands) 2021 2020

Balance at beginning of period $187 $152

Impact of adopting ASC 326 1,229 —

Adjusted balance, beginning of period 1,416 152

(Benefit) provision for credit losses (320) 35

Balance at end of period $1,096 $187

While management believes that it uses the best information available to determine the ACL, unforeseen market conditions and other events could result in an adjustment to the ACL, and net income could be significantly affected if circumstances differed substantially from the assumptions used in making the final determination of the ACL.

Purchased Receivables

We purchase accounts receivable from our business customers and provide them with short-term working capital.

We provide this service to our customers in Alaska, Washington, Oregon, and some other states through NFS.

Our purchased receivable activity is guided by policies that outline risk management, documentation, and approval limits.

The policies are reviewed and approved annually by the Company's Board of Directors.

Purchased receivables are recorded on the balance sheet net of a reserve for purchased receivable losses.

Purchased receivable balances decreased at December 31, 2021 to $7.0 million from $13.9 million at December 31, 2020, and year-to-date average purchased receivable balances were $12.4 million and $14.5 million in 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Purchased receivable income was $2.3 million and $2.7 million in 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Purchased receivable income in 2020 decreased from 2019 due to decreased average balances due to customers reportedly using PPP loans to fund liquidity needs instead of selling receivables.

The following table sets forth information regarding changes in the purchased receivable reserve for the years indicated:

Purchased receivable income in 2021 decreased from 2020 due to customers reportedly using PPP loans to fund liquidity needs instead of selling receivables.

The following table sets forth information regarding changes in the purchased receivable ACL for the years indicated:

(In Thousands) 2021 2020 2019

2 unchanged sentences

Recoveries — — —

Net recoveries (charge-offs) — — —

Charge-offs net of recoveries — — —

Reserve for (recovery from) purchased receivables — (21) (96)

3 unchanged sentences

Total deposits increased 33% to $2.4 billion at December 31, 2021 from $1.8 billion at December 31, 2020.

This increase is primarily due to funding PPP loans, but is also due to new client relationships as a result of the Company's significant PPP efforts during 2020.

This increase is primarily due to funding PPP loans, but is also due to new client relationships as a result of the Company's significant PPP efforts during 2021 and 2020.

Our deposits generally are expected to fluctuate according to the level of our market share, economic conditions, and normal seasonal trends.

10 unchanged sentences

Total average deposits $2,125,080 $1,638,216 $1,276,407

Certificates of Deposit :

The Company's mix of deposits continues to contribute to a low cost of funds with balances in transaction accounts representing 93% of total deposits at December 31, 2021 and 90% at December 31, 2020.

The only deposit category with stated maturity dates is certificates of deposit.

19 unchanged sentences

FHLB advances are dependent on the availability of acceptable collateral such as marketable securities or real estate loans, although all FHLB advances are secured by a blanket pledge of the Company’s assets.

At December 31, 2020, our maximum borrowing line from the FHLB was $946.2 million, approximately 45% of the Bank’s assets, subject to the FHLB’s collateral requirements.

The Company has outstanding advances of $14.8 million as of December 31, 2020 which were originated to match fund low income housing projects that qualify for long term fixed interest rates.

At December 31, 2021, our maximum borrowing line from the FHLB was $1.219 billion, approximately 45% of the Bank’s assets, subject to the FHLB’s collateral requirements.

The Company has outstanding advances of $14.5 million as of December 31, 2021 which were originated to match fund low income housing projects that qualify for long term fixed interest

These advances have original terms of either 18 or 20 years with 30 year amortization periods and fixed interest rates ranging from 1.23% to 3.25%.

2 unchanged sentences

There were no discount window advances outstanding at December 31, 2021 or 2020.

The Company $2,000 in interest in 2020 and paid less than $1,000 in interest in 2019 on this agreement.

The Company paid less than $1,000 in interest in 2021 and 2020 on this agreement.

The Company utilized the Federal Reserve Bank's PPPLF to fund SBA PPP loans during the second quarter of 2020, but has repaid those funds in full as of June 30, 2020.

This advance had an interest rate of 0.35%.

Other Short-term Borrowings:

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase were zero as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

The average balance outstanding of securities sold under agreements to repurchase during 2020 and 2019 was zero and $15.2 million, respectively, and the maximum outstanding at any month-end was zero and $36.6 million, respectively, during the same time periods.

The securities sold under agreements to repurchase were held by the FHLB under the Company’s control.

Other Short and Long-term Borrowings:

The Company had no short or long-term borrowings outstanding other than the FHLB advances noted above as of December 31, 2021 or 2020.

The Company is subject to provisions under Alaska state law which generally limit the amount of outstanding debt to 35% of total assets or $948.0 million at December 31, 2021 and 35% of total assets or $736.0 million at December 31, 2020.

As of April 7, 2020, the State of Alaska increased this limit to 35% of total assets.

Long-term Borrowings:

The Company had no long-term borrowings outstanding other than the FHLB advances noted above as of December 31, 2020 or 2019.

Contractual Obligations

The following table references contractual obligations of the Company for the periods indicated.

This table does not include interest payments:

Payments Due by Period

Within 1 Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years Over 5 Years

(In Thousands) Total

December 31, 2020:

Certificates of deposit $128,970 $44,237 $630 $1,794 $175,631

Long-term borrowings 312 833 872 12,800 14,817

Junior Subordinated Debentures

Operating lease obligations 2,619 4,140 3,527 4,875 15,161

Other long-term liabilities (1)

9,482 1,654 778 4,291 16,205

Capital commitments 71 — — — 71

Total $141,454 $50,864 $5,807 $34,070 $232,195

December 31, 2019:

Certificates of deposit $90,554 $70,734 $1,390 $1,794 $164,472

Long-term borrowings 187 444 471 7,789 8,891

Junior subordinated debentures — — — 10,310 10,310

Operating lease obligations 2,665 4,718 3,592 6,453 17,428

Other long-term liabilities 2,937 9,484 1,341 4,001 17,763

Capital commitments 1,389 — — — 1,389

Total $97,732 $85,380 $6,794 $30,347 $220,253

(1) Includes principal payments related to employee benefit plans.

If a benefit payment schedule is established, payments are recorded in the corresponding dates listed in the table above.

Unscheduled payments for all remaining benefits are recorded "Over 5 Years".

Additional information about employee benefit plans is provided in Note 19 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II.

Item 8 below.

Short and long-term borrowings included in the table above are described in the "Borrowings" section above.

Junior subordinated debentures include $10.3 million that was originated on December 16, 2005, matures on March 15, 2036, and bears interest at a rate of 90-day LIBOR plus 1.37%, adjusted quarterly.

The Company entered into an interest rate swap in the

third quarter of 2017 to hedge the variability in cash flows arising out of its junior subordinated debentures, by swapping the cash flows with an interest rate swap which receives floating and pays fixed.

On December 16, 2005, the Company’s subsidiary, NST2, issued trust preferred securities in the principal amount of $10 million.

These securities carry an interest rate of 90-day LIBOR plus 1.37% per annum that was initially set at 5.86% adjusted quarterly.

The securities have a maturity date of March 15, 2036, and are callable by the Company on or after March 15, 2011.

These securities are treated as Tier 1 capital by the Company’s regulators for capital adequacy calculations.

The interest cost to the Company of these securities was $160,000 in 2021.

At December 31, 2021, the securities had an interest rate of 1.57%.

The Company entered into an interest rate swap in the third quarter of 2017 to hedge the variability in cash flows arising out of its junior subordinated debentures, by swapping the cash flows with an interest rate swap which receives floating and pays fixed.

The Company has designated this interest rate swap as a hedging instrument.

The interest rate swap effectively fixes the Company's interest payments on the $10 million of junior subordinated debentures held under Northrim Statutory Trust 2 ("NST2") at 3.72% through its maturity date.

Operating lease obligations are more fully described in Note 12 of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report.

Other long-term liabilities consist of amounts that the Company owes for its investments in Delaware limited partnerships that develop low-income housing projects throughout the United States.

Additional information about these partnerships is included at Note 8 of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II.

Item 8 of this report.

The Company purchased a $10.7 million interest in R4 Frontier Housing Partners L.P., Coronado Park Senior Village L.P.

("R4-Coronado") in March 2013.

The investment in R4-Coronado was 99% funded at the end of 2020 and is expected to be fully funded in 2029.

The Company purchased an $8.5 million interest in R4 Frontier Housing Partners L.P., Mountain View Village V L.P.

("R4-MVV") in May 2014.

The investment in R4-MVV was 98% funded at the end of 2020 and is expected to be fully funded in 2030.

The Company purchased a $6.8 million interest in R4 Frontier Housing Partners L.P., PJ33 L.P.

("R4-PJ33") in June 2016.

The investment in R4-PJ33 was 95% funded at the end of 2020 and is expected to be fully funded in 2032.

The Company purchased a $7.3 million interest in R4 Frontier Housing Partners L.P., Parkscape L.P.

("R4-Coronado II") in June 2019.

The investment in R4-Coronado II was 23% funded at the end of 2020 and is expected to be fully funded in 2035.

The Company also purchased a $4.0 million interest in R4 Frontier Housing Partners L.P., Duke Apartments L.P.

("R4-Duke") in November 2019.

The investment in R4-Duke was 9% funded at the end of 2020 and is expected to be fully funded in 2035.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk.

Among the off-balance sheet items entered into in the ordinary course of business are commitments to extend credit, commitments to originate loans held for sale and the issuance of letters of credit.

These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized on the balance sheet.

Certain commitments are collateralized.

We apply the same credit standards to these commitments as in all of our lending activities and include these commitments in our lending risk evaluations.

As of December 31, 2020, we had commitments to extend credit of $375.1 million, which were not reflected on our balance sheet, compared to $301.9 million as of December 31, 2019.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers.

These commitments have specified interest rates and generally have fixed expiration dates but may be terminated by the Company if certain conditions of the contract are violated.

Collateral held relating to these commitments varies, but generally includes real estate, inventory, accounts receivable, and equipment.

Our exposure to credit loss under commitments to extend credit is represented by the amount of these commitments.

Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, these total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

As of December 31, 2020, we had commitments to originate loans held for sale of $150.3 million, which were not reflected in the balance sheet compared to $48.8 million as of December 31, 2019.

Mortgage loans sold to investors may be sold with servicing rights released, for which the Company makes only standard legal representations and warranties as to meeting certain underwriting and collateral documentation standards.

In the past two years, the Company has had to repurchase one loan due to deficiencies in underwriting or loan documentation and has not realized significant losses related to this repurchase.

Management currently believes that any liabilities that may result from such recourse provisions are not significant.

As of December 31, 2020, we had standby letters of credit of $2.3 million, which were not reflected on our balance sheet compared to $2.0 million as of December 31, 2019.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.

Credit risk arises in these transactions from the possibility that a customer may not be able to repay the Company upon default of performance.

Collateral held for standby letters of credit is based on an individual evaluation of each customer’s creditworthiness.

Our total unfunded lending commitments at December 31, 2020, which includes commitments to extend credit, commitments to originate loans held for sale and standby letters of credit, were $527.7 million, compared to $352.7 million as of December 31, 2019.

We do not expect that all of these commitments are likely to be fully drawn upon at any one time.

The Company has established reserves of $187,000 and $152,000 at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, for estimated losses related to these commitments that are recorded in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.

Additional information regarding Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements is included in Notes 20 and 21 of the Notes to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II.

Item 8 of this report.

The interest rate swap effectively fixes the Company's interest payments on the $10 million of junior subordinated debentures held under NST2 at 3.72% through its maturity date.

Net of the impact of the interest rate swap, interest expense on these securities was $382,000 in 2021 and $385,000 in 2020.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2020, was $221.6 million, as compared to $207.1 million at December 31, 2019.

The Company earned net income of $32.9 million, issued 19,195 shares of common stock through the vesting of restricted stock units and repurchased 327,000 shares during 2020.

At December 31, 2020, the Company had approximately 6.3 million shares of its common stock outstanding.

The Company is a single bank holding company and its primary ongoing source of liquidity is from dividends received from the Bank.

1 unchanged sentence

Banking regulations and regulatory authorities may limit the amount of, or require the Bank to obtain certain approvals before paying, dividends to the Company.

Given that the Bank currently meets and the Bank anticipates that it will continue to meet, all applicable capital adequacy requirements for a “well-capitalized” institution by regulatory standards, including the conservation buffer that is now in full effect, the Company expects to continue to receive dividends from the Bank during 2021.

Given that the Bank currently meets and the Bank anticipates that it will continue to meet, all applicable capital adequacy requirements for a “well-capitalized” institution by regulatory standards, the Company expects to continue to receive dividends from the Bank during 2022.

Other available sources of liquidity for the bank holding company include the issuance of debt and the issuance of common or preferred stock.

As of December 31, 2021, the Company has 10.0 million authorized shares of common stock, of which 6.0 million are issued and outstanding, leaving 4.0 million shares available for issuance.

Additionally, the Company has 2.5 million authorized shares of preferred stock available for issuance.

The Bank manages its liquidity through its Asset and Liability Committee.

Our primary sources of funds are customer deposits and advances from the FHLB.

These funds, together with loan repayments, loan sales, other borrowed funds, retained earnings, and equity are used to make loans, to acquire securities and other assets, and to fund deposit flows and continuing operations.

The Bank's primary source of funds are customer deposits.

These funds, together with loan repayments, loan sales, maturity of investment securities, borrowed funds, and retained earnings are used to make loans, to acquire securities and other assets, and to fund deposit flows and continuing operations.

The primary sources of demands on our liquidity are customer demands for withdrawal of deposits and borrowers’ demands that we advance funds against unfunded lending commitments.

The Company had cash and cash equivalents of $645.8 million, or 24% of total assets at December 31, 2021 compared to $116.0 million, or 6% of total assets as of December 31, 2020.

The increase in cash and cash equivalents is primarily due to a significant increase in deposits.

Management expects this elevated level of liquidity to continue through 2022 and potentially into subsequent years.

Accordingly, management has invested in slightly longer term investment securities as compared to the last several years.

As of December 31, 2021, the weighted average maturity of available for sale securities is 4.1 years compared to 2.6 years at December 31, 2020.

At December 31, 2021, $5.0 million in available for sale securities mature in 2022, $15 million mature in 2023, and $116.2 million mature in 2024.

Our total unfunded commitments to fund loans, loans held for sale, and letters of credit at December 31, 2021, were $445.9 million.

We do not expect that all of these loans are likely to be fully drawn upon at any one time.

Additionally, as noted above, our total deposits at December 31, 2020, were $1.8 billion.

As shown in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, net cash used by operating activities was $36.5 million in 2020 and net cash used by operating activities was $821,000 in 2019.

The primary source of cash provided by operating activities for all periods presented was positive net income;

however, in 2020 and 2019 the origination of loans held for sale exceeded proceeds from the sale of loans held for sale which is the primary reason that operating cash flow is negative in both years.

At December 31, 2021, certificates of deposit totaling $118.6 million and $52.6 million, respectively, contractually mature in 2022 and 2023, and may be withdrawn from the Bank.

Similar to loans, we do not

expect that these maturing certificates of deposit, or other non-maturity deposits, to be withdrawn from the Bank in a manner that will strain liquidity;

however, unforeseen future circumstances or events may cause higher than anticipated withdrawal of deposits or draws of unfunded commitments to fund new loans.

Management believes that cash requirements to fund future non-deposit liabilities, including operating lease liabilities, other liabilities, or borrowings as of December 31, 2021, are not material to the Company's liquidity position as of December 31, 2021.

The Company has other available sources of liquidity to fund unforeseen liquidity needs.

These include borrowings available through our correspondent banking relationships and our credit lines with the Federal Reserve Bank and the FHLB.

At December 31, 2021, our liquid assets were $907.9 million and our funds available for borrowing under our existing lines of credit were $1.27 billion.

Given these sources of liquidity and our expectations for customer demands for cash and for our operating cash needs, we believe our sources of liquidity to be sufficient in the foreseeable future.

As shown in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows included in Part II.

Item 8 of this report, net cash provided by operating activities was $112.0 million in 2021 and net cash used by operating activities was $36.5 million in 2020.

The primary source of cash provided by, and used by operating activities for all periods presented was positive net income.

In 2021 proceeds from the sale of loans held for sale exceeded proceeds used in originations as refinance activity slowed, and in 2020 the opposite was true.

In 2020 the origination of loans held for sale exceeded proceeds from the sale of loans held for sale which is the primary reason that operating cash flow is negative in 2020.

Net cash used by investing activities was $159.1 million in 2021 primarily due to purchases of available for sale and held to maturity securities.

Net cash used by investing activities was $382.8 million in 2020 primarily due to increases in loans, in particular PPP loans.

Net cash used by investing activities was $71.9 million in 2019 primarily due to the fact that purchases of investment securities and net investments in loans and purchased receivables exceeded proceeds from sales and maturities of securities available for sale.

Financing activities provided cash of $577.0 million in 2021 and $439.8 million in 2020.

Financing activities provided cash in 2020 due to an increase in deposits largely due to funding PPP loans that was done via deposit into customer accounts.

This increase was only partially offset by the repurchase of 327,000 shares of the Company's common stock for $10.0 million and the payment of dividends to shareholders.

Financing activities provided cash in 2019 due to an increase in deposits that was only partially offset by a decrease in securities sold under repurchase agreements, repurchase of 347,676 shares of the Company's common stock for $12.6 million, and the payment of cash dividends to shareholders.

The sources by which we meet the liquidity needs of our customers are current assets and borrowings available through our correspondent banking relationships and our credit lines with the Federal Reserve Bank and the FHLB.

At December 31, 2020, our current assets were $423.8 million and our funds available for borrowing under our existing lines of credit were $1.01 billion.

Additionally, the Company can obtain additional nonrecourse borrowings under the Federal Reserve Bank's newly created PPPLF as a source of additional liquidity in order to meet liquidity needs created by the origination of PPP loans without excessive usage of the Company's other existing liquidity sources.

The Company had $216.0 million in PPP loans eligible to be pledged for the PPPLF program as of December 31, 2020.

the Company has not obtained any other new borrowing lines or other new sources of liquidity other than the PPPLF program resulting from anticipated liquidity challenges from COVID-19.

Given these sources of liquidity and our expectations for customer demands for cash and for our operating cash needs, we believe our sources of liquidity to be sufficient in the foreseeable future.

During 2020, the Company's Board of Directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $0.34 per common share for the first and second quarters and $0.35 per common share for the third and fourth quarters.

These dividends were made pursuant to our existing dividend policy and in consideration of, among other things, earnings, regulatory capital levels, liquidity, asset quality, and the overall payout ratio.

We expect that dividend payments will be reassessed on a quarterly basis by the Board of Directors in accordance with the dividend policy.

The payment of cash dividends is subject to regulatory limitations as described under the Supervision and Regulation section of Part I.

Item 1 of this report.

There is no assurance that future cash dividends on common shares will be declared or increased.

On February 25, 2021, the Board of Directors approved payment of a $0.37 per share dividend on March 19, 2021, to shareholders of record on March 11, 2021.

This dividend is $0.02, or 6%, higher than the Company’s dividend of $0.35 that was paid in the fourth quarter of 2020.

In September 2002, our Board of Directors approved a plan whereby we would periodically repurchase for cash up to approximately 5% of our shares of common stock in the open market.

We purchased an aggregate of 688,442 shares of our common stock under this program through December 31, 2009 at a total cost of $14.2 million at an average price of $20.65 per share, which left a balance of 227,242 shares available under the stock repurchase program.

The Company did not repurchase any of its shares in 2010 through 2016.

In 2017, we purchased an aggregate of 58,341 shares at an average price of $27.56 per share.

In 2018, we purchased an aggregate of 15,468 shares at an average price of $31.90 per share.

In April 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a plan whereby it would periodically repurchase for cash up to approximately 5% of its shares of common stock in the open market where 340,000 shares were available for repurchase.

In 2019 we purchased an aggregate of 347,676 shares at an average price of $36.15 per share.

On January 27, 2020, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 327,000 shares of common stock.

In 2020, the Company repurchased 327,000 shares at an average price of $30.51.

At December, 31, 2020, there were zero shares available under the stock repurchase program.

On February 1, 2021, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 313,000 shares of common stock.

We intend to continue to repurchase our stock from time-to-time depending upon market conditions, but we can make no assurances that we will continue this program or that we will authorize additional shares for repurchase.

The table below shows this effect on diluted earnings per share.

Financing activities provided cash in both 2021 and 2020 due to increases in deposits that were only partially offset by the payment of cash dividends to shareholders and the repurchase of shares of the Company's common stock.

Throughout our history, the Company has periodically repurchased for cash a portion of its shares of common stock in the open market.

The following table presents the amount of common shares repurchased and the weighted average price paid per share for the periods indicated:

Years Ending:

Common Shares Repurchased Weighted Average Price

2021 279,276 $41.30

2020 327,000 $30.51

2019 347,676 $36.15

2018 15,468 $31.90

2017 58,341 $27.56

At December, 31, 2021, there were 33,724 shares available under the previously announced stock repurchase program.

However, on January 28, 2022 the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 300,000 shares of common stock.

The Company intends to continue to repurchase our stock from time-to-time depending upon market conditions, but we can make no assurances that we will continue this program or that we will authorize additional shares for repurchase.

The table below shows the cumulative effect the repurchase of common shares since the inception of the Company on diluted earnings per share:

Years Ending:

Reported Diluted EPS without Stock Repurchase

4 unchanged sentences

2017 $1.88 $1.69

On December 16, 2005, the Company’s subsidiary, NST2, issued trust preferred securities in the principal amount of $10 million.

These securities carry an interest rate of 90-day LIBOR plus 1.37% per annum that was initially set at 5.86% adjusted quarterly.

The securities have a maturity date of March 15, 2036, and are callable by the Company on or after March 15, 2011.

These securities are treated as Tier 1 capital by the Company’s regulators for capital adequacy calculations.

The interest cost to the Company of these securities was $219,000 in 2020.

At December 31, 2020, the securities had an interest rate of 1.59%.

The Company has designated this interest rate swap as a hedging instrument.

The interest rate swap effectively fixes the Company's interest payments on the $10 million of junior subordinated debentures held under NST2 at 3.72% through its maturity date.

Net of the impact of the interest rate swap, interest expense on these securities was $385,000 in 2020 and $389,000 in 2019.

Regulatory Capital Requirements:

We are subject to minimum capital requirements.

4 unchanged sentences

Management intends to maintain capital ratios for the Bank in 2022 exceeding the FDIC’s new requirements for the “well-capitalized” classification.

The capital ratios for the Company exceed those for the Bank primarily because the $10 million trust preferred securities offering that the Company completed in the fourth quarter of 2005 is included in the Company’s capital for regulatory purposes, although they are accounted for as a long-term debt in our consolidated financial statements.

The capital ratios for the Company exceed those for the Bank primarily because the $10 million trust preferred securities offering is included in the Company’s capital for regulatory purposes, although they are accounted for as a long-term debt in our consolidated financial statements.

The trust preferred securities are not accounted for on the Bank’s financial statements nor are they included in its capital.

12 unchanged sentences

Under the rules of the Federal Reserve Bank, a bank holding company such as the Company is generally defined to be "well capitalized" if its Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio is 8.0% or more and its total risk-based capital ratio is 10.0% or more.

Effects of Inflation and Changing Prices:

The primary impact of inflation on our operations is increased operating costs.

Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature.

As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than the effects of general levels of inflation.

Although interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services, increases in inflation generally have resulted in increased interest rates, which could affect the degree and timing of the repricing of our assets and liabilities.

In addition, inflation has an impact on our customers’ ability to repay their loans.

See additional discussion below in Part II.

Item 7A of this report regarding how various market risks affect the Company.

Critical Accounting Policies

The SEC defines "critical accounting policies" as those that require application of management's most difficult, subjective or complex judgments as a result of the need to make "critical accounting estimates", which are estimates that involve estimation uncertainty that has had or is reasonably likely to have a material impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II.

Item 8 of this report.

Not all of these significant accounting policies require management to make critical accounting estimates.

Management believes that the following accounting policies would be considered critical under the SEC's definition.

The following discussion is intended to supplement, but not duplicate, information provided in Note 1 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II.

Item 8 of this report for these policies.

Allowance for Credit Losses Policy :

The Company adopted CECL on January 1, 2021.

The Company's Executive Loan Management Committee and Asset Liability Committee are both involved in monitoring various aspects of the Company's ACL methodology.

The Company's Audit Committee provides board oversight of the ACL process and reviews and approves the ACL methodology on a quarterly basis.

CECL is not prescriptive in the methodology used to determine the expected credit loss estimate.

Therefore, management has flexibility in selecting the methodology.

However, the expected credit losses must be estimated over a financial asset's contractual term, adjusted for prepayments, utilizing quantitative and qualitative factors.

The estimate of current expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amounts.

Historical loss experience is the starting point for estimating expected credit losses.

Adjustments are made to historical loss experience to reflect differences in asset-specific risk characteristics, such as underwriting standards, portfolio mix or asset terms, and differences in economic conditions – both current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts.

When the Company is not able to make or obtain reasonable and supportable forecasts for the entire life of the financial asset it has estimated expected credit losses for the remaining life after the forecasted period using an approach that reverts to historical credit loss information.

Depending on the nature and size of the pool of financial assets with similar risk characteristics, the Company uses a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) method or a weighted average remaining life method to estimate expected credit losses quantitatively.

The Company uses a DCF method for 8 of its 11 loan pools, which represent 97% of the amortized cost basis of total loan pools at December 31, 2021.

The weighted average remaining life method is used for the remaining 3 loan pools primarily because loan level data constraints preclude the use of the DCF model.

Under the DCF method, the Company utilizes complex models to obtain reasonable and supportable forecasts to calculate two predictive metrics, the probability of default ("PD") and loss given default ("LGD").

The PD measures the probability that a loan will default within a given time horizon and is an assumption derived from regression models which determine the relationship between historical defaults and certain economic variables.

The Company's regression models for PD utilize the Company's actual historical loan level default data.

The Company determines a reasonable and supportable forecast and applies that forecast to the regression model to estimate defaults over the forecast period.

Management leverages economic projections from a reputable and independent third-party to inform its loss driver forecasts over the Company's four quarter forecast period.

Management utilizes and forecasts Alaska unemployment as a loss driver for all of the loans pools that utilize the DCF method.

Management also utilizes and forecasts either one-year percentage change in the Alaska home price index or the one-year percentage change in the national commercial real estate price index as a second loss driver depending on the nature of the underlying loan pool and how well that loss driver correlates to expected future losses.

Other internal and external indicators of economic forecasts are also considered by management when developing the forecast metrics.

Following the forecast period, the economic variables used to calculate PD revert to a historical average at a constant rate over an eight quarter reversion period.

Other assumptions relevant to the discounted cash flow model to derive the quantitative allowance include the LGD, which is the estimate of loss for a defaulted loan, prepayment speeds, and the discount rate applied to future cash flows.

The DCF method utilizes the effective interest rate of individual assets to discount the expected credit losses over the contractual term of the loan, adjusted for prepayments.

The LGD is the expected loss which would be realized presuming a default has occurred and primarily measures the value of the collateral or other secondary source of repayment related to the collateral.

The Company has identified the following pools of financial assets with similar risk characteristics for measuring expected credit losses under CECL as adopted by the Company on January 1, 2021:

Commercial & industrial - Commercial loans are loans for commercial, corporate and business purposes.

The Company’s commercial business loan portfolio is comprised of loans for a variety of purposes and across a variety of industries.

These loans include general commercial and industrial loans, loans to purchase capital equipment, and other business loans for working capital and operational purposes.

Commercial loans are generally secured by accounts receivable, inventory and other business assets.

Also included in commercial loans are our PPP loans originated during 2020 and 2021.