LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
−Removed: August 7, 2018, we commenced an action against North Empire LLC, or North Empire, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County
−Removed: of New York for breach of a Securities Purchase Agreement or Agreement in which we are seeking damages in an amount to be determined
−Removed: at trial, but in no event less than $616,000.
−Removed: On August 2, 2018, North Empire filed a Summons with Notice against us, also in the same
−Removed: Court, in which they allege damages in an amount of $11.4 million arising from an alleged breach of the Agreement.
+Added: time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business.
+Added: litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may
+Added: harm our business.
+Added: August 7, 2018, we commenced an action against North Empire LLC, or North Empire, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York,
+Added: County of New York for breach of a Securities Purchase Agreement or Agreement in which we are seeking damages in an amount to be
+Added: determined at trial, but in no event less than $616,000.
+Added: On August 2, 2018, North Empire filed a Summons with Notice against us,
+Added: also in the same Court, in which they allege damages in an amount of $11.4 million arising from an alleged breach of the Agreement.
+Added: On September 6, 2018, North Empire filed a Notice of Discontinuance of the action it had filed on August 2, 2018.
On September 27,
−Removed: North Empire filed a Notice of Discontinuance of the action it had filed on August 2, 2018.
−Removed: On September 27, 2018, North Empire filed
−Removed: an answer and asserted counterclaims in the action commenced by us against them, alleging that we failed to deliver stock certificates
−Removed: to North Empire causing damage to North Empire in the amount of $10,958,589.
−Removed: North Empire also filed a third-party complaint against
−Removed: our CEO and now former Chairman of the Board asserting similar claims against them in their individual capacities.
−Removed: On October 17, 2018,
−Removed: we filed a reply to North Empire’s counterclaims.
−Removed: On November 15, 2018, our CEO and now former Chairman of the Board filed a motion
−Removed: to dismiss North Empire’s third-party complaint.
−Removed: On January 6, 2020, the Court granted the motion and dismissed the third-party
−Removed: Discovery has been completed and both parties have filed motions for summary judgment in connection with the claims and counterclaims.
−Removed: On December 30, 2021, the Court denied both My Size and North Empire’s motions for summary judgment, arguing there were factual
−Removed: issues to be determined at trial.
−Removed: On January 26, 2022, the Company filed a notice of appeal of the summary judgment decision.
−Removed: must be fully perfected and filed by July 26, 2022.
−Removed: On February 3, 2022, the Company filed a motion to reargue the Court’s decision
−Removed: denying the Company’s motion for summary judgment.
−Removed: North Empire will file its opposition papers on or before March 31, 2022, and
−Removed: the Company will file reply papers on April 29, 2022.
−Removed: The return date on the motion to reargue is scheduled for May 2, 2022.
+Added: 2018, North Empire filed an answer and asserted counterclaims in the action commenced by us against them, alleging that we failed to
+Added: deliver stock certificates to North Empire causing damage to North Empire in the amount of $10,958,589.
+Added: North Empire also filed a
+Added: third-party complaint against our CEO and now former Chairman of the Board asserting similar claims against them in their individual
+Added: On October 17, 2018, we filed a reply to North Empire’s counterclaims.
+Added: On November 15, 2018, our CEO and now
+Added: former Chairman of the Board filed a motion to dismiss North Empire’s third-party complaint.
+Added: On January 6, 2020, the Court
+Added: granted the motion and dismissed the third-party complaint.
+Added: Discovery has been completed and both parties have filed motions for
+Added: summary judgment in connection with the claims and counterclaims.
+Added: On December 30, 2021, the Court denied both My Size and North
+Added: Empire’s motions for summary judgment, arguing there were factual issues to be determined at trial.
+Added: On January 26, 2022, the
+Added: Company filed a notice of appeal of the summary judgment decision.
+Added: On February 3, 2022, the Company filed a motion to reargue the
+Added: Court’s decision denying the Company’s motion for summary judgment.
+Added: On or about September 12, 2022, the Court issued its
+Added: Decision and Order denying the Company’s motion to reargue.
+Added: North Empire filed its opposing brief on December 7, 2022.
+Added: sides were given an opportunity to file a reply brief.
+Added: We filed our reply brief on January 4, 2023 and North Empire filed its reply
+Added: brief on January 13, 2023.
+Added: Oral argument was held before the Appellate Court on February 7, 2023.
+Added: On or about February 28, 2023, the
+Added: Appellate Court filed its Decision and Order, which affirmed the lower court’s decisions regarding both My Size and North
+Added: Empire’s motions for summary judgment and sent the case back to the Supreme Court.
+Added: On or about March 13, 2023, the Supreme
+Added: Court referred the case to its Alternative Dispute Program and ordered the cases to mediate.
+Added: A date for the mediation has not yet
We intend to vigorously defend any claims made by North Empire.
−Removed: Venture Capital Ltd
−Removed: 5, 2021, we were served with a legal complaint filed by Fidelity Venture Capital Ltd.
−Removed: and Dror Atzmon in the Magistrate’s
−Removed: Court in Tel Aviv for a monetary award in an amount of NIS 1,436,679 (approximately $450,000) and a declaratory relief.
−Removed: The plaintiffs
−Removed: allege that we breached our contractual obligations to pay them for services allegedly rendered to the us by the plaintiffs under a certain
−Removed: consulting agreement dated July 2, 2014, in an amount of NIS 819,000 (approximately $256,000).
−Removed: Additionally, the plaintiffs allege that
−Removed: the we should compensate them for losses allegedly incurred by them following their investment in the sour shares issued under a certain
−Removed: private offering.
−Removed: In the alternative, the plaintiffs move that the court will declare the investment agreement void with full restitution
−Removed: of plaintiffs’ original investment in an amount of NIS 1,329,650 (approximately $415,000).
−Removed: We filed our statement of defense on
−Removed: October 25, 2021.
−Removed: The first preliminary court hearing of the case is scheduled for January 23, 2022.
−Removed: The first court preliminary hearing
−Removed: was held on March 1, 2022.
−Removed: Following the first preliminary hearing and the Court’s comments and recommendation, the Plaintiffs
−Removed: filed a motion to strike out the claim without prejudice.
−Removed: On March 8, 2022 the Court ordered dismissal without prejudice of the claim.
+Added: We believe it is more likely than not that the
+Added: counterclaims will be denied.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.