12 unchanged sentences
On July 2, 2020, lead plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint.
−Removed: The consolidated complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendants made materially false or misleading statements or omissions regarding Former Six Flags' business, operations and growth prospects, specifically with respect to the development of its Six Flags branded parks in China and the financial health of its former partner, Riverside Investment Group Co.
+Added: The consolidated complaint alleged, among other things, that the defendants made materially false or misleading statements or omissions regarding Former Six Flags' business, operations and growth prospects, specifically with respect to the development of Six Flags branded parks in China and the financial health of its former partner, Riverside Investment Group Co.
Ltd., in violation of the federal securities laws.
−Removed: The consolidated complaint seeks an unspecified amount of compensatory damages and other relief on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of Former Six Flags’ publicly traded common stock during the period between April 24, 2018 and February 19, 2020.
+Added: The consolidated complaint sought an unspecified amount of compensatory damages and other relief on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of Former Six Flags’ publicly traded common stock during the period between April 24, 2018 and February 19, 2020.
On August 3, 2020, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint.
1 unchanged sentence
On August 25, 2021, Co-Lead Plaintiff Oklahoma Firefighters filed a notice of appeal to the U.S.
−Removed: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (“the Fifth Circuit”) from the district court’s decisions granting defendants’ motion to dismiss, denying plaintiffs’ motion to amend or set aside judgment, and denying plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a supplemental brief.
+Added: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (“the Fifth Circuit”) from the district court’s decisions granting defendants’ motion to dismiss, denying plaintiffs’ motion to
+Added: amend or set aside judgment, and denying plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a supplemental brief.
The appeal was fully briefed as of December 15, 2021, and oral argument was held on March 7, 2022.
12 unchanged sentences
On September 23, 2024, the District Court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval of the settlement and scheduled a final fairness hearing for January 25, 2025.
−Removed: Stockholder Derivative Lawsuits
−Removed: On February 16, 2023, a putative stockholder derivative lawsuit was filed on behalf of nominal defendant Former Six Flags by John Hancock in Texas state court against certain of its former executive officers and directors (the “individual defendants”) in an action captioned Hancock v.
+Added: On January 28, 2025, the District Court entered its order and judgement of final approval of the settlement agreement.
+Added: Shareholder Derivative Lawsuits
+Added: On February 16, 2023, a putative shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed on behalf of nominal defendant Former Six Flags by John Hancock in Texas state court against certain of its former executive officers and directors (the “individual defendants”) in an action captioned Hancock v.
Roedel, et al., Case No.
13 unchanged sentences
On July 8, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Nonsuit Without Prejudice, which the court ordered on July 9, 2024.
−Removed: On February 22, 2023, a putative stockholder derivative lawsuit was filed on behalf of nominal defendant Former Six Flags by Antonio Dela Cruz in in the U.S.
+Added: On February 22, 2023, a putative shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed on behalf of nominal defendant Former Six Flags by Antonio Dela Cruz in the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of Texas against certain of its current and former executive officers and directors (the “individual defendants”) in an action captioned Cruz v.
11 unchanged sentences
Securities and Exchange Commission Investigation
−Removed: The Securities and Exchange Commission is conducting an investigation into Former Six Flags' disclosures and reporting made in 2018 through February 2020 related to its business, operations and growth prospects of its Six Flags branded parks in China and the financial health of its former business partner, Riverside Investment Group Co.
−Removed: Former Six Flags received a document subpoena in February 2020 and subsequently certain current and former executives received subpoenas in connection with this matter and they continue to provide responsive information.
−Removed: The involved parties are fully cooperating and are committed to continuing to cooperate fully with the SEC in this matter.
−Removed: The length, scope or results of the investigation, or the impact, of the investigation on results of operations, business or financial condition cannot be predicted.
−Removed: There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in Part II, Item 1A of the Combined Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, which is incorporated herein by reference.
+Added: The Securities and Exchange Commission conducted an investigation into Former Six Flags' disclosures and reporting made in 2018 through February 2020 related to its business, operations and growth prospects of its Six Flags branded parks in China and the financial health of its former business partner, Riverside Investment Group Co.
+Added: Former Six Flags received a document subpoena in February 2020 and subsequently certain current and former executives received subpoenas in connection with this matter.
+Added: The investigation was concluded by the Securities and Exchange Commission during the first quarter of 2025, and no enforcement actions were recommended.
+Added: There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A.
+Added: Risk Factors of the Combined Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.