What changed in this filing

/stocks — the workspaceLOADING

Item 1. Business

2022-03-16 compared with 2021-03-15 · 470 added, 305 removed, 164 unchanged (83% of the section changed)

General Development of the Business

August 1, 1916, marked the first day of business for Farmers & Merchants Bank (the “Bank”).

The Bank was incorporated under the laws of the State of California and licensed as a state-chartered bank.

Farmers & Merchants’ first venture out of Lodi occurred when the Galt office opened in 1948.

Since then the Bank has opened full-service branches in Linden, Manteca, Riverbank, Modesto, Sacramento, Elk Grove, Turlock, Hilmar, Stockton, Merced, Walnut Creek, Concord, Napa and Lockeford.

During 2018, the Company completed the acquisition of Bank of Rio Vista, headquartered in Rio Vista, California.

This provided the Company entry into both Rio Vista and Walnut Grove, enhancing the Bank’s market share in Lodi.

In addition to 29 full-service branches, the Bank serves the needs of its customers through three stand-alone ATMs located on the grounds of the Lodi Grape Festival, in the Trilogy Residential Community clubhouse in Rio Vista and the Shadelands business center in Walnut Creek.

In 2007, the Bank began offering certain banking products over the internet at www.fmbonline.com.

On March 10, 1999, the Company, pursuant to a reorganization, acquired all of the voting stock of the Bank.

The Company is a bank holding company incorporated in the State of Delaware and registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended.

The Company’s outstanding securities as of December 31, 2020, consisted of 789,646 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value and no shares of preferred stock issued.

The Bank is the Company’s principal asset.

The Bank’s two wholly owned subsidiaries are Farmers & Merchants Investment Corporation and Farmers/Merchants Corp.

Farmers & Merchants Investment Corporation is currently dormant and Farmers/Merchants Corp.

acts as trustee on deeds of trust originated by the Bank.

F & M Bancorp, Inc.

was created in March 2002 to protect the name “F & M Bank.” During 2002, the Company completed a fictitious name filing in California to begin using the streamlined name, “F & M Bank,” as part of a larger effort to enhance the Company’s image and build brand name recognition.

Since 2002, the Company has converted all of its daily operating and image advertising to the “F & M Bank” name and the Company’s logo, slogan and signage were redesigned to incorporate the trade name, “F & M Bank.”

During 2003, the Company formed a wholly owned Connecticut statutory business trust, FMCB Statutory Trust I, for the sole purpose of issuing trust-preferred securities.

See Note 13, located in “Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

The Company’s principal business is to serve as a holding company for the Bank and for other banking or banking related subsidiaries, which the Company may establish or acquire.

Organizational Structure

Farmers & Merchants Bancorp is a Delaware registered bank holding company organized in 1999.

As a registered bank holding company, FMCB is subject to regulation, supervision, and examination by the Board of

Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”) and by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (“DFPI”).

The Company’s principal business is to serve as a holding company for the Bank and for other banking or banking related

subsidiaries, which the Company may establish or acquire.

As a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiary, the Company’s principal source of funds is, and will continue to be, dividends paid by and other funds received from the Bank.

Legal limitations are imposed on the amount of dividends that may be paid and loans that may be made by the Bank to the Company.

See “Supervision and Regulation - Dividends and Other Transfer of Funds.”

The Bank’s deposit accounts are insured under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act up to applicable limits.

See “Supervision and Regulation - Dividends and Other Transfer of Funds.” The Company’s outstanding common stock as of

December 31, 2021, consisted of 789,646 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value and no shares of preferred stock were issued or outstanding.

During 2003, the Company formed a wholly-owned Connecticut statutory business trust, FMCB Statutory Trust I, for the sole purpose of issuing trust-preferred securities.

See Note 10 “Long-Term Subordinated Debentures”

located in Item 8.

“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report of Form 10-K.

The Company operates all financial service activities through its wholly-owned banking subsidiary, Farmers & Merchants Bank of Central California, which was organized in 1916.

The Bank was incorporated under the

laws of the State of California as a non-FRB member, California state-chartered bank subject to primary regulation, supervision and examination by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and by the DFPI.

The Bank’s two wholly-owned

subsidiaries are Farmers & Merchants Investment Corporation and Farmers/Merchants Corporation.

Farmers & Merchants Investment Corporation is currently dormant and Farmers/Merchants Corporation acts as trustee on deeds of trust originated by

The Bank’s deposit accounts are insured under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, as amended (“FDIA”), up to applicable limits.

See “Supervision and Regulation – Deposit Insurance”.

As a bank holding company, the Company is subject to regulation and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”).

The Bank is a California state-chartered non-FRB member bank subject to the regulation and examination of the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (“DFPI”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).

Acquisition of Bank of Rio Vista (“BRV”)

On October 10, 2018, the Company completed its acquisition of Bank of Rio Vista, which occurred through a series of stock purchases beginning in April 2017.

The total consideration paid for the acquisition was $40.73 million.

The Company engaged in this transaction with the expectation it would be accretive to income and add a new market area with a demographic profile consistent with many of the Central Valley markets served by the Company.

Since 2014, the Company has broadened its geographic footprint by opening offices in Walnut Creek, Concord, Napa, Rio Vista and Walnut Grove.

The Company continues to look for opportunities to further expand its branch network in the East Bay area of San Francisco, and over the past two years has purchased buildings in Walnut Creek, Lafayette and Montclair that will become future branch locations.

Despite the recent expansion of our geographic footprint, the Company’s primary service area remains the mid Central Valley of California, including Sacramento, San Joaquin, Stanislaus and Merced counties, where we operate 28 full-service branches and 3 stand-alone ATM.

This area encompasses:

The Sacramento Metropolitan Statistical Area (“MSA”), with branches in Sacramento, Elk Grove, Galt and Walnut Grove.

This MSA has a Population of 2.4 million and a Per Capita Income of approximately $58,843.

The MSA includes significant employment in the following sectors:

F & M Bancorp, Inc.

was created in March 2002 to protect the name “F & M Bank.” During 2002, the Company completed a fictitious name filing in California to begin using the streamlined name, “F & M Bank,”

as part of a larger effort to enhance the Company’s image and build brand name recognition.

Since 2002, the Company has converted all of its daily operating and image advertising to the “F & M Bank” name and the Company’s logo, slogan and signage

were redesigned to incorporate the trade name, “F & M Bank”.

The Company’s primary service area is the mid Central Valley of California, including Sacramento, San Joaquin, Solano, Stanislaus and Merced counties, and the east region of the San Francisco Bay Area including Napa,

Alameda, and Contra Costa counties.

The Company operates 29 full-service branches and 3 stand-alone ATMs.

The Company’s market areas include the following Metropolitan Statistical Areas (“MSA”), which most recent data as of January 18, 2022:

The Sacramento MSA (Sacramento County Only), with branches in Sacramento, Elk Grove, Galt and Walnut Grove.

This county had a Population of 1.6 million and a Per Capita Income of approximately $58,307.

The MSA includes significant

employment in the following sectors:

government, education & health trade, and transportation & utilities.

Unemployment currently stands at 6.7%.

Unemployment was at 4.8%.

The Stockton-Lodi MSA, with branches in Lodi, Linden, Stockton, Lockeford and Manteca.

This MSA has a Population of 0.76 million and a Per Capita Income of approximately $47,139.

The MSA includes significant employment in the following sectors:

trade, transportation, and utilities, government, and education and health services.

Unemployment currently stands at 9.0%.

This MSA had a Population of 0.77 million and a Per Capita Income of approximately $51,816.

The MSA includes significant employment in the following

trade, transportation & utilities, government, and education & health services.

Unemployment was at 6.6%.

The Vallejo-Fairfield MSA (Rio Vista Only, census tract 2535.00), with branches in Rio Vista.

This census tract had a Population of 9,221 and a Weighted Average of Median Family Income of $64,022.

The city includes significant employment

in the following industries:

agriculture, manufacturing, tourism and other services.

Unemployment was at 6.7%.

The Modesto MSA, with branches in Modesto, Riverbank and Turlock.

This MSA has a Population of 0.55 million and a Per Capita Income of approximately $45,742.

This MSA had a Population of 0.55 million and a Per Capita Income of approximately $48,954.

The MSA includes significant employment in the following sectors:

trade, transportation and utilities, educational & health services, and government.

Unemployment currently stands at 8.3%.

transportation & utilities, educational & health services, and government.

Unemployment was at 6.2%.

The Merced MSA, with branches in Hilmar and Merced.

This MSA has a Population of 0.28 million and a Per Capita Income of approximately $41,077.

This MSA had a Population of 0.28 million and a Per Capita Income of approximately $43,914.

The MSA includes significant employment in the following sectors:

government, trade, transportation and utilities and farming.

Unemployment currently stands at 9.0%.

All of the Company’s Central Valley service areas are heavily influenced by the agricultural industry, however, with the exception of the State of California in the Sacramento MSA, no single employer represents a material concentration of jobs in any of our service areas.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Overview” and “Financial Condition – Loans & Leases” for additional discussion regarding the Company’s market conditions.

government, trade,

transportation & utilities, and farming.

Unemployment was at 7.6%.

The Oakland-Hayward-Berkeley MD, with branches in Concord, Walnut Creek, and Oakland.

This MSA had a Population of 2.8 million and a Per Capita Income of approximately $89,201.

The MSA includes significant employment in the following

professional & business services, educational & health services, trade, and transportation & utilities.

Unemployment was at 4.4%.

The Napa MSA, with a branch in Napa.

This MSA had a Population of 0.14 million and a Per Capita Income of approximately $82,408.

The MSA includes significant employment in the following sectors:

manufacturing, leisure & hospitality,

trade, and transportation & utilities.

Unemployment was at 4.2%.

Through its network of banking offices, the Company emphasizes personalized service along with a broad range of banking services to businesses and individuals located in the service areas of its offices.

Although the Company focuses on marketing its services to small and medium sized businesses, a broad range of retail banking services are made available to the local consumer market.

Company focuses on marketing its services to small and medium-sized businesses, a broad range of retail banking services are also made available to the local consumer market.

The Company offers a wide range of deposit instruments.

These include checking, savings, money market, time certificates of deposit, individual retirement accounts and online banking services for both business and personal accounts.

The Company provides a broad complement of lending products, including commercial, commercial real estate, real estate construction, agribusiness, consumer, credit card, residential real estate loans, and equipment leases.

These include checking, savings, money market, time certificates of deposit, individual retirement accounts and online banking services for both business and

personal accounts.

Commercial products include term loans, leases, lines of credit and other working capital financing and letters of credit.

Financing products for individuals include automobile financing, lines of credit, residential real estate, home improvement and home equity lines of credit.

Financing products for individuals include automobile financing, lines of credit, residential real estate, home

improvement and home equity lines of credit.

The Company also offers a wide range of specialized services designed for the needs of its commercial accounts.

These services include a credit card program for merchants, lockbox and other collection services, account reconciliation, investment sweep, on-line account access, and electronic funds transfers by way of domestic and international wire and automated clearinghouse.

These services include a credit card program for merchants, lockbox and other collection services, account

reconciliation, investment sweep, on-line account access, and electronic funds transfers by way of domestic and international wire and automated clearinghouse.

The Company makes investment products available to customers, including mutual funds and annuities.

These investment products are offered through a third party, which employs investment advisors to meet with and provide investment advice to the Company’s customers.

Human Capital

These investment products are offered through a third party, which employs investment advisors to meet with and

provide investment advice to the Company’s customers.

The banking and financial services industry in California generally, and in the Company’s market areas specifically, is highly competitive.

The increasingly competitive environment is a result primarily of changes in

regulation, changes in technology and product delivery systems, and the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial service providers.

The Company competes with other major commercial banks, diversified financial institutions, credit unions,

savings institutions, money market and other mutual funds, mortgage companies, and a variety of other non-banking financial services and advisory companies.

Federal legislation encourages competition between different types of financial service

providers and has fostered new entrants into the financial services market.

It is anticipated that this trend will continue.

Using the financial holding company structure, insurance companies and securities firms may compete more directly with banks

and bank holding companies.

Many of our competitors are much larger in total assets and capitalization, have greater access to capital markets and offer a broader range of financial services than the Company.

In order to compete with other

financial service providers, the Company relies upon personal contact by its officers, directors, employees, and stockholders, along with various promotional activities and specialized services.

In those instances where the Company is unable to

accommodate a customer’s needs, the Company may arrange for those services to be provided through its correspondents.

The market shares of the Bank and its largest competitors in the eight counties in California in which we operate, ranked by deposit market share at June 30, 2021 (the most recent data available), as reported by

S&P Global Market Intelligence, are as follows:

Wells Fargo Bank

Bank of the West

Bank of America

JPMorgan Chase Bank

Human Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2021, we employed 373 full-time equivalent employees.

The Company believes that its employee relations are satisfactory.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, salaries and employee benefits expense totaled $57 million, representing 69% of our total non-interest expense.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, salaries and employee benefits expense

totaled $64 million, representing 70% of our total non-interest expense.

Expenses related to education, training, recruiting and placement exceeded $300,000 for the three-year period ended December 31, 2021.

We are led by an experienced management team with substantial experience in the markets that we serve and the financial products that we offer.

Our business strategy focuses on providing products and services through long-term relationship managers.

Our business strategy focuses on providing products and services through

long-term relationship managers.

As a result, our success depends heavily on the performance of our employees, as well as on our ability to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified employees at all levels of the Company.

We believe that our work environment contributes to employee satisfaction and retention.

We believe that our work

environment contributes to employee satisfaction and retention.

We are committed to maintaining a work environment where every employee is treated with dignity and respect, free from the threat of discrimination and harassment.

As stated in our Board approved (i) Code of Conduct and (ii) Prohibited Harassment Policy, we expect these same standards apply to all stakeholders, to our interactions with customers, vendors and independent contractors.

We are firmly committed to providing equal employment and advancement opportunities to all qualified individuals and will not tolerate any illegal discrimination or harassment of any kind.

Team members are encouraged to immediately report any improper discrimination or harassment to their supervisor and human resources.

As stated in our Board approved (i) Code of Conduct

and (ii) Prohibited Harassment Policy, we expect these same standards apply to all stakeholders, to our interactions with customers, vendors and independent contractors.

We are firmly committed to providing equal employment and advancement opportunities to all qualified individuals and will not tolerate any discrimination or harassment of any kind.

Team members are encouraged to

immediately report any discrimination or harassment to their supervisor and human resources.

Policies and Planning

We are proud to be an Equal Opportunity Employer and enforce those values throughout all of our operations.

We prohibit discrimination in hiring or advancement against any individual on the basis of race, color, religion, gender, sex, national origin, age, marital status, pregnancy, physical or mental disability, genetics, veteran status, sexual orientation, or any other characteristic protected by applicable law.

We prohibit discrimination in hiring or advancement against any individual on the basis of race, color,

religion, gender, sex, national origin, age, marital status, pregnancy, physical or mental disability, genetics, veteran status, sexual orientation, or any other characteristic protected by applicable law.

We strive to ensure our team members have access to working conditions that provide a safe and healthy environment, free from work-related injuries and illnesses.

Many of our locations employ badges and keypads to enter or to enter restricted areas of locations that have a public presence.

As a company designated as an “essential industry” during the COVID-19 crisis, we have been focused on safety and health regimens that protect our employees who have reported to work during this difficult time.

Many of our locations employ badges and keypads to

enter or to enter restricted areas of locations that have a public presence.

As a company having been designated as an “essential industry” during the COVID-19 pandemic, we focused on safety and health regimens that are designed to protect our

employees who have reported to work during this difficult time.

This has resulted in our ability to keep all of our branches open for business while providing a safe work environment for our employees.

Each year our annual planning and budgeting process involves an assessment of staffing levels and skills and results in the development of targets for recruitment and training.

In addition the Board reviews all succession plans in place for key personnel.

In addition, our Board of Directors

reviews all succession plans in place for key personnel.

We strive to recruit talent from both local educational institutions and the banking industry.

The Company has full-time staff dedicated to our recruitment efforts and we utilize many of the major recruitment firms and websites.

The Company has full-time staff dedicated to our recruitment efforts and we utilize many of the major recruitment firms and

Annually we visit local colleges and universities for job fairs and other recruitment events, which we believe allows us to identify those students who have the skills and aptitudes we need in the Company.

The results of these efforts has been a consistent flow of candidates to fill our staffing needs as we grow.

The results of these efforts has

been a consistent flow of candidates to fill our staffing needs as we grow.

Salary and Bonuses

1 unchanged sentence

Annually we use outside survey firms to provide information on market pay.

We also pay generous performance based bonuses to employees.

During 2020, total bonus compensation amounted to over 30% of base salaries.

This “pay-for-performance” approach allows us to effectively recruit and retain key employees.

We also pay performance-based bonuses to our employees.

total bonus compensation amounted to over 30% of base salaries.

We believe that this “pay-for-performance” approach allows us to effectively recruit and retain key employees.

Retirement Plans

All employees are eligible to participate in our Profit Sharing Plan after 1 year of service and having worked at least 1,000 hours.

The Company makes mandatory contributions equal to 5% of the employee’s eligible compensation and discretionary contributions determined annually by the Board of Directors.

This is not a matching based program, employees receive these contributions regardless of whether they make individual contributions to our 401(K) program.

During 2020 total expenses for the profit sharing plan amounted to over 10% of base salaries, a generous level that helps us in recruitment and retention.

The Company makes contributions equal to 5% of the employee’s eligible compensation

and discretionary contributions determined annually by the Board of Directors.

This is not a matching based program;

employees receive these contributions regardless of whether they make individual contributions to our 401(K) program.

total expenses for the profit sharing plan amounted to over 10% of base salaries, a level that we believe helps us in recruitment and retention.

Medical and Other Benefits

In addition to competitive salaries, incentives and retirement benefits, we provide comprehensive medical, dental, and vision plans, health savings accounts, paid sick time, long-term disability, basic life and AD&D insurance, flexible spending accounts, and employee assistance and wellness programs.

AD&D insurance, flexible spending accounts, and employee assistance and wellness programs.

We support team members, should they wish to continue their education in subjects and fields that are directly related to our operations, activities, and objectives.

We encourage our team members to pursue educational opportunities that will help improve job performance and professional development.

We encourage our team members to pursue educational

opportunities that will help improve job performance and professional development.

To further this goal, we reimburse tuition and certain fees for satisfactory completion of approved educational courses and certain certifications.

Included are college credit courses at accredited colleges and universities, continuing education courses and certification exams.

college credit courses at accredited colleges and universities, continuing education courses and certification exams.

Diversity and Inclusion

To foster a deeper understanding regarding diversity and inclusion, the Company assigns all employees diversity and inclusion training - Diversity Made Simple.

The diversity course is mandatory for all staff.

The diversity

course is mandatory for all staff.

As of December 31, 2021, all employees have met their diversity and inclusion training obligations.

1 unchanged sentence

The Company assigns all employees prohibitive harassment training.

Every two years nonsupervisory employees receive one hour of harassment prevention training while supervisors receive two hours of harassment prevention training.

Every two years nonsupervisory employees receive one hour of harassment prevention training while supervisors

receive two hours of harassment prevention training.

Newly hired employees are assigned harassment prevention and must complete the training within six months of hire or promotion.

Following the initial training, all employees must complete training every two years, at minimum.

As of December 31, 2020, all employees have met their prohibitive harassment training requirements.

Following the initial training, all employees must complete training

every two years, at minimum.

As of December 31, 2021, all employees have met their harassment prevention training requirements.

Performance Evaluation

The Company has implemented a Performance Planning, Coaching and Evaluation (“PPC&E”) system that requires each year that employees and their managers establish detailed goals and objectives.

Annually employees are reviewed relative to their progress in achieving those goals, with the objective of reducing performance surprises and encouraging behavior that is consistent with Company objectives.

We believe that this PPC&E discipline is important in retaining and growing our employees.

The banking and financial services industry in California generally, and in the Company’s market areas specifically, is highly competitive.

The increasingly competitive environment is a result primarily of changes in regulation, changes in technology and product delivery systems, and the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial service providers.

The Company competes with other major commercial banks, diversified financial institutions, credit unions, savings institutions, money market and other mutual funds, mortgage companies, and a variety of other non-banking financial services and advisory companies.

Federal legislation encourages competition between different types of financial service providers and has fostered new entrants into the financial services market.

It is anticipated that this trend will continue.

Using the financial holding company structure, insurance companies and securities firms may compete more directly with banks and bank holding companies.

Many of our competitors are much larger in total assets and capitalization, have greater access to capital markets and offer a broader range of financial services than the Company.

In order to compete with other financial service providers, the Company relies upon personal contact by its officers, directors, employees, and stockholders, along with various promotional activities and specialized services.

In those instances where the Company is unable to accommodate a customer’s needs, the Company may arrange for those services to be provided through its correspondents.

Annually, employees

are reviewed relative to their progress in achieving those goals, with the objective of reducing performance surprises and encouraging behavior that is consistent with Company objectives.

We believe that this PPC&E discipline is important in

retaining and growing our employees.

Government Policies

The Company’s profitability, like most financial institutions, is primarily dependent on interest rate differentials.

The difference between the interest rates paid by the Company on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and other borrowings, and the interest rates received by the Company on its interest-earning assets, such as loans & leases extended to its customers and securities held in its investment portfolio, comprise the major portion of the Company’s earnings.

These rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond the control of the Company and the Bank, such as inflation, recession and unemployment.

The impact that changes in economic conditions might have on the Company and the Bank cannot be predicted.

The difference between the interest rates paid by the Company on interest-bearing liabilities, such

as deposits and other borrowings, and the interest rates received by the Company on its interest-earning assets, such as loans and leases extended to its customers and securities held in its investment portfolio, comprise the major portion of the

Company’s earnings.

These rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond the control of the Company and the Bank, such as inflation, recession, unemployment, and the monetary policy of the FRB.

The impact that changes in economic

conditions might have on the Company and the Bank cannot be predicted.

The business of the Company is also influenced by the monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government and the policies of regulatory agencies, particularly the FRB.

The FRB implements national monetary policies (with objectives such as curbing inflation and combating recession) through its open-market operations in U.S.

Government securities by adjusting the required level of reserves for depository institutions subject to its reserve requirements, and by varying the target federal funds and discount rates applicable to borrowings by depository institutions.

The actions of the FRB in these areas influence the growth of bank loans & leases, investments, and deposits and also affect interest rates earned on interest-earning assets and paid on interest-bearing liabilities.

The nature and impact on the Company of any future changes in monetary and fiscal policies cannot be predicted.

From time to time, legislative acts, as well as regulations, are enacted which have the effect of increasing the cost of doing business, limiting or expanding permissible activities, or affecting the competitive balance between banks and other financial services providers.

Proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the operations and taxation of banks, bank holding companies, and other financial institutions and financial services providers are frequently made in the U.S.

The FRB implements national monetary policies

(with objectives such as curbing inflation and such as maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates) through its open-market operations in U.S.

Government securities by adjusting the required level of reserves for

depository institutions subject to its reserve requirements, and by varying the target federal funds and discount rates applicable to borrowings by depository institutions.

The actions of the FRB in these areas influence the growth of bank loans and leases, investments, and deposits and affect interest rates earned on interest-earning assets and paid on interest-bearing liabilities.

nature and impact on the Company of any future changes in monetary and fiscal policies cannot be predicted.

balance between banks and other financial services providers.

Proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the operations and taxation of banks, bank holding companies, and other financial institutions and financial services providers are

frequently made in the U.S.

Congress, in the state legislatures, and before various regulatory agencies.

This legislation may change banking statutes and the operating environment of the Company and the Bank in substantial and unpredictable ways.

If enacted, such legislation could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities or affect the competitive balance among banks, savings institutions, credit unions, and other financial institutions.

The Company cannot predict whether any of this potential legislation will be enacted, and if enacted, the effect that it, or any implemented regulations, would have on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

enacted, such legislation or regulations could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities or affect the competitive balance among banks, savings institutions, credit unions, and other financial

institutions.

any of its subsidiaries.

Supervision and Regulation

Bank holding companies and banks are extensively regulated under both federal and state law.

The regulation is intended primarily for the protection of the banking system and the deposit insurance fund and not for the benefit of stockholders of the Company.

This supervisory and regulatory framework subjects banks and bank holding companies to regular examination by their respective regulatory agencies, which results in examination reports and ratings that, while not publicly available, can affect the conduct and growth of their businesses.

These examinations consider not only compliance with applicable laws and regulations, but also capital levels, asset quality and risk, management ability and performance, earnings, liquidity, and various other factors.

The regulatory agencies generally have broad discretion to impose restrictions and limitations on the operations of a regulated entity where the agencies determine, among other things, that such operations are unsafe or unsound, fail to comply with applicable law or are otherwise inconsistent with laws and regulations or with the supervisory policies of these agencies.

The regulation is intended primarily for the protection of the banking system and the Deposit Insurance Fund and clients of

insured depository institutions and not for the benefit of stockholders of the Company.

This supervisory and regulatory framework subjects banks and bank holding companies to regular examination by their respective regulatory agencies, which

results in examination reports and ratings that, while not publicly available, can affect the conduct and growth of their businesses.

These examinations consider not only compliance with applicable laws and regulations, but also capital levels,

asset quality and risk, management ability and performance, earnings, liquidity, and various other factors.

The regulatory agencies generally have broad discretion to impose restrictions and limitations on the operations of a regulated entity where

the agencies determine, among other things, that such operations are unsafe or unsound, fail to comply with applicable law or are otherwise inconsistent with laws and regulations or with the supervisory policies of these agencies.

Set forth below is a summary description of the material laws and regulations, which relate to the operations of the Company and the Bank.

This description does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the applicable laws and regulations.

The Company is a registered bank holding company and is subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (“BHCA”), as amended.

Accordingly, the Company’s operations are subject to extensive regulation and examination by the FRB.

This description does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its

entirety by reference to the applicable laws and regulations.

The Company is a registered bank holding company and is subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (“BHCA”).

Accordingly, the Company’s operations are subject to extensive regulation

and examination by the FRB.

The Company is required to file with the FRB quarterly and annual reports and such additional information as the FRB may require pursuant to the BHCA.

The FRB conducts periodic examinations of the Company.

The FRB may require that the Company terminate an activity or terminate control of or liquidate or divest certain subsidiaries of affiliates when the FRB believes the activity or the control of the subsidiary or affiliate constitutes a significant risk to the financial safety, soundness or stability of any of its banking subsidiaries.

The FRB may require that the Company terminate an activity, terminate control of, liquidate, or divest certain subsidiaries or affiliates when the FRB believes the activity or the control of the subsidiary or affiliate

constitutes a significant risk to the financial safety, soundness or stability of any of its banking subsidiaries.

The FRB also has the authority to regulate provisions of certain bank holding company debt.

Under certain circumstances, the Company must file written notice and obtain approval from the FRB prior to purchasing or redeeming its equity securities.

Under the BHCA and regulations adopted by the FRB, a bank holding company and its non-banking subsidiaries are prohibited from requiring certain tie-in arrangements in connection with an extension of credit, lease or sale of property, or furnishing of services.

For example, with certain exceptions, a bank may not condition an extension of credit on a promise by its customer to obtain other services provided by it, its holding company or other subsidiaries, or on a promise by its customer not to obtain other services from a competitor.

Under certain circumstances, the Company

must file written notice and obtain approval from the FRB prior to purchasing or redeeming its equity securities.

sale of property, or furnishing of services.

a promise by its customer not to obtain other services from a competitor.

In addition, federal law imposes certain restrictions on transactions between Farmers & Merchants Bancorp and its subsidiaries.

Further, the Company is required by the FRB to maintain certain levels of capital.

Further, the Company is required by the FRB

to maintain certain levels of capital.

See “Capital Standards”.

The Company is prohibited by the BHCA, except in certain statutorily prescribed instances, from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the outstanding voting shares of any company that is not a bank or bank holding company and from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks, or furnishing services to its subsidiaries.

However, the Company, subject to the prior notice and/or approval of the FRB, may engage in any, or acquire shares of companies engaged in, activities that are deemed by the FRB to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto.

not a bank or bank holding company and from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks, or furnishing services to its subsidiaries.

However, the Company, subject to the prior notice and/or

approval of the FRB, may engage in any, or acquire shares of companies engaged in, activities that are deemed by the FRB to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto.

A bank holding company is required to serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary banks and may not conduct its operations in an unsafe or unsound manner.

In addition, it is the FRB’s policy that in serving as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks, a bank holding company should stand ready to use available resources to provide adequate capital funds to its subsidiary banks during periods of financial stress or adversity and should maintain the financial flexibility and capital-raising capacity to obtain additional resources for assisting its subsidiary banks.

In addition, it is the FRB’s

policy, that in serving as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks, a bank holding company should stand ready to use available resources to provide adequate capital funds to its subsidiary banks during periods of financial stress or adversity

and should maintain the financial flexibility and capital-raising capacity to obtain additional resources for assisting its subsidiary banks.

This support may be required at times when a bank holding company may not be able to provide such support.

A bank holding company’s failure to meet its obligations to serve as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks will generally be considered by the FRB to be an unsafe and unsound banking practice or a violation of the FRB’s regulations or both.

The Company is not a financial holding company for purposes of the FRB.

bank holding company’s failure to meet its obligations to serve as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks will generally be considered by the FRB to be an unsafe and unsound banking practice or a violation of the FRB’s regulations or both.

The Company is not a financial holding company for purposes of the BHCA.

The Company is also a bank holding company within the meaning of the California Financial Code.

As such, the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to examination by, and may be required to file reports with, the DFPI.

The Company’s securities are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

As such, the Company is subject to the reporting, proxy solicitation and other requirements and restrictions of the Exchange Act.

As such, the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to examination by, and may be required to file reports with, the

The Company’s common stock are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

As such, the Company is subject to the

reporting, proxy solicitation and other requirements and restrictions of the Exchange Act.

The Bank, as a California-chartered non-FRB member bank, is subject to primary supervision, periodic examination and regulation by the DFPI and the FDIC.

If, as a result of an examination of the Bank, the FDIC should determine that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity, or other aspects of the Bank’s operations are unsatisfactory, or that the Bank or its management is violating or has violated any law or regulation, various remedies are available to the FDIC.

Such remedies include the power to enjoin “unsafe or unsound” practices, to require affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting from any violation or practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in capital, to restrict the growth of the Bank, to assess civil monetary penalties, to remove officers and directors, and ultimately to terminate the Bank’s deposit insurance, which for a California chartered bank would result in a revocation of the Bank’s charter.

If, as a result of an examination of the Bank, the FDIC should

determine that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity, or other aspects of the Bank’s operations are unsatisfactory, or that the Bank or its management is violating or has violated any law

or regulation, various remedies are available to the FDIC.

judicially enforced, to direct an increase in capital, to restrict the growth of the Bank, to assess civil monetary penalties, to remove officers and directors, and ultimately to terminate the Bank’s deposit insurance, which for a

California-chartered bank would result in a revocation of the Bank’s charter.

The DFPI has many of the same remedial powers.

Various requirements and restrictions under the laws of the State of California and the United States affect the operations of the Bank.

State and federal statutes and regulations relate to many aspects of the Bank’s operations, including reserves against deposits, ownership of deposit accounts, interest rates payable on deposits, loans & leases, investments, mergers and acquisitions, borrowings, dividends, locations of branch offices, and capital requirements.

State and federal statutes and regulations relate to many aspects of the Bank’s

operations, including reserves against deposits, ownership of deposit accounts, interest rates payable on deposits, loans and leases, investments, mergers and acquisitions, borrowings, dividends, locations of branch offices, and capital requirements.

Further, the Bank is required to maintain certain levels of capital.

6 unchanged sentences

imposing more stringent capital requirements on bank holding companies and subjecting certain activities, including interstate mergers and acquisitions, to heightened capital conditions;

changing the assessment base for federal deposit insurance from the amount of the insured deposits held by the depository institution to the depository institution’s average total consolidated assets less tangible equity, eliminating the ceiling on the size of the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund and increasing the floor of the size of the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund;

ceiling on the size of the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund and increasing the floor on the size of the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund;

eliminating all remaining restrictions on interstate banking by authorizing state banks to establish de novo banking offices in any state that would permit a bank chartered in that state to open a banking office at that location;

repealing the federal prohibitions on the payment of interest on demand deposits, thereby permitting depository institutions to pay interest on business transaction and other accounts;

in the so-called “Volcker Rule,” subject to numerous exceptions, prohibiting depository institutions and affiliates from certain investments in, and sponsorship of, hedge funds and private equity funds and from engaging in proprietary trading.

On February 3, 2017, President Trump signed an executive order calling for his administration to review existing U.S.

financial laws and regulations, including the Dodd-Frank Act, in order to determine their consistency with a set of “core principles” of financial policy.

On May 24, 2018 President Trump signed the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act (the “Economic Growth Act”), which repeals or modifies certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and eases regulations on all but the largest banks.

On May 24, 2018 President Trump signed the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act (“Economic Growth Act”), which repeals or modifies certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank

Act and eases regulations on all but the largest banks.

The Economic Growth Act’s highlights include improving consumer access to mortgage credit that, among other things:

(i) exempt banks with less than $10 billion in assets from the ability-to-repay requirements for certain qualified residential mortgage loans;

(ii) not require appraisals for certain transactions valued at less than $400,000 in rural areas;

(iii) exempt banks and credit unions that originate fewer than 500 open-end and 500 closed-end mortgages from the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act’s (“HMDA”) expanded data disclosures (the provision would not apply to nonbanks and would not exempt institutions from HMDA reporting altogether);

(iv) amend the SAFE Mortgage Licensing Act by providing registered mortgage loan originators in good standing with 120 days of transitional authority to originate loans when moving from a federal depository institution to a non-depository institution or across state lines;

(v) require the CFPB to clarify how TRID applies to mortgage assumption transactions and construction-to-permanent home loans as well as outline certain liabilities related to model disclosure use;

and (vi) provide that federal banking regulators may not impose higher capital standards on High Volatility Commercial Real Estate exposures unless they are for acquisition, development or construction (“ADC”), and clarifies ADC status.

In addition, the Economic Growth Act’s highlights also include regulatory relief for certain institutions, whereby among other things, it simplifies capital calculations by requiring regulators to adopt a threshold for a community bank leverage ratio of between 8% to 10%.

Institutions under $10 billion in assets that meet such community bank leverage ratio will automatically be deemed to be well-capitalized, although regulators retain the flexibility to determine that a depository institution may not qualify for the community bank leverage ratio test based on the institution’s risk profile, and exempts community banks from Section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act if they have less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets;

(i) exempt banks with less than $10 billion in assets from the ability-to-repay

requirements for certain qualified residential mortgage loans;

(ii) do not require appraisals for certain transactions valued at less than $400,000 in rural areas;

(iii) exempt banks and credit unions that originate fewer than 500 open-end and 500

closed-end mortgages from the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act’s (“HMDA”) expanded data disclosures (the provision would not apply to nonbanks and would not exempt institutions from HMDA reporting altogether);

(iv) amend the SAFE Mortgage Licensing Act

by providing registered mortgage loan originators in good standing with 120 days of transitional authority to originate loans when moving from a federal depository institution to a non-depository institution or across state lines;

(v) require the

CFPB to clarify how Truth in Lending Disclosure (“TRID”) rules apply to mortgage assumption transactions and construction-to-permanent home loans as well as outline certain liabilities related to model disclosure use;

and (vi) provide that federal

banking regulators may not impose higher capital standards on High Volatility Commercial Real Estate exposures unless they are for acquisition, development or construction (“ADC”), and clarifies ADC status.

In addition, the Economic Growth Act’s

highlights also include regulatory relief for certain institutions, including among other things, simplifying capital calculations by requiring regulators to adopt a threshold for a community bank leverage ratio of between 8% to 10%.

Institutions under $10 billion in assets that meet such community bank leverage ratio will automatically be deemed to be well-capitalized, although regulators retain the flexibility to determine

that a depository institution may not qualify for the community bank leverage ratio test based on the institution’s risk profile, and exempts community banks from Section 13 of the BHCA if they have less than $10 billion in total consolidated

and exempts banks with less than $10 billion in assets, and total trading assets and liabilities not exceeding more than five percent of their total assets, from the Volcker Rule restrictions on trading with their own capital.

The Economic Growth Act also adds certain protections for consumers, including veterans and active duty military personnel, expanded credit freezes and creation of an identity theft protection database.

The Economic Growth Act also makes changes for bank holding companies, as it raises the threshold for automatic designation as a systemically important financial institution from $50 billion to $250 billion in assets, subjects banks with $100 billion to $250 billion in total assets to periodic stress tests, exempts from stress test requirements entirely banks with under $100 billion in assets, and requires the federal banking regulators to, within 180 days of passage, raise the asset threshold under the Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement from $1 billion to $3 billion.

The Economic Growth Act also adds certain protections for student borrowers.

On June 17, 2019, the federal bank regulatory agencies jointly issued a final rule to streamline regulatory reporting requirements and committed to further review of reporting burdens for smaller institutions.

The rule permits insured depository institutions with total assets of less than $5 billion that do not engage in certain complex or international activities to file the most streamlined version of the call report, the FFIEC 051 Call Report.

This streamlined reporting reduces the data items required to be reported in the first and third quarters by approximately 37% and became effective July 22, 2019.

The Bank elected not to adopt the new streamlined version FFIEC 051 Call Report.

Many aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act are subject to rulemaking and will take effect over several years, making it difficult to anticipate the overall financial impact on us.

In addition, the Economic Growth Act modifies several provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act, but are subject to implementing regulations.

Although the reforms primarily target systemically important financial service providers (which the Bank is not), the Dodd-Frank Act’s influence has and is expected to continue to filter down in varying degrees to smaller institutions over time.

The Economic Growth Act also added certain protections for consumers, including veterans and active duty military personnel, expanded credit freezes and created an identity theft protection

The Economic Growth Act also made changes applicable to bank holding companies, as it raises the threshold for automatic designation as a systemically important financial institution from $50 billion to $250 billion in assets, subjects

banks with $100 billion to $250 billion in total assets to periodic stress tests, exempts from stress test requirements entirely banks with under $100 billion in assets, and required the federal banking regulators , within 180 days of passage, to

raise the asset threshold under the Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement from $1 billion to $3 billion.

The Economic Growth Act also added certain protections for student borrowers.

Some aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act remain subject to rulemaking and will take effect over several years, making it difficult to anticipate the overall financial impact on us.

In addition, the

Economic Growth Act modified several provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act, but these remain subject to implementing regulations.

Although the reforms primarily target systemically important financial service providers (which the Bank is not), the

Dodd-Frank Act’s influence has and is expected to continue to filter down in varying degrees to smaller institutions over time.

We will continue to evaluate the effect of the Dodd-Frank Act;

however, in many respects, the ultimate impact of the Dodd-Frank Act will not be fully known for years, and no current assurance may be given that the Dodd-Frank Act, or any other new legislative changes, will not have a negative impact on the results of operations and financial condition of the Company and the Bank.

however, in many respects, the ultimate impact of the

Dodd-Frank Act will not be fully known for years, and no current assurance may be given that the Dodd-Frank Act, or any other new legislative changes, will not have a negative impact on the results of operations and financial condition of the

Company and the Bank.

Capital Standards

The federal banking agencies have risk-based capital adequacy guidelines intended to provide a measure of capital adequacy that reflects the degree of risk associated with a banking organization’s operations, both for transactions reported on the balance sheet as assets and for transactions, such as letters of credit and recourse arrangements, that are recorded as off-balance sheet items.

In 2013, the FRB, FDIC, and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued final rules (the “Basel III Capital Rules”) establishing a new comprehensive capital framework for U.S.

The federal banking agencies have risk-based capital adequacy guidelines intended to provide a measure of capital adequacy that reflects the degree of risk associated with a banking

organization’s operations, both for transactions reported on the balance sheet as assets and for transactions, such as letters of credit and recourse arrangements, that are recorded as off-balance sheet items.

In 2013, the FRB, FDIC, and Office of

the Comptroller of the Currency issued final rules (the “Basel III Capital Rules”) establishing a new comprehensive capital framework for U.S.

banking organizations.

The rules implement the Basel Committee’s December 2010 framework, commonly referred to as Basel III, for strengthening international capital standards, as well as implementing certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act.

The rules implement the Basel Committee’s December 2010 framework, commonly referred to as Basel III, for strengthening international capital standards, as well as implementing certain provisions

of the Dodd-Frank Act.

The Basel III Capital Rules became effective for the Company and the Bank on January 1, 2015 (subject to phase-in periods for some of their components).

The Basel III Capital Rules:

(i) introduce a new capital measure called Common Equity Tier 1 (“CET1”), and a related regulatory capital ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets;

(ii) specify that Tier 1 capital consists of CET1 and “Additional Tier 1 capital” instruments, which are instruments treated as Tier 1 instruments under the prior capital rules that meet certain revised requirements;

(i) introduce

a new capital measure called Common Equity Tier 1 (“CET1”), and a related regulatory capital ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets;

(ii) specify that Tier 1 capital consists of CET1 and “Additional Tier 1 capital” instruments, which are instruments

treated as Tier 1 instruments under the prior capital rules that meet certain revised requirements;

(iii) mandate that most deductions or adjustments to regulatory capital measures be made to CET1 and not to the other components of capital;

and (iv) expand the scope of the deductions from and adjustments to capital, as compared to existing regulations.

Under the Basel III Capital Rules, for most banking organizations, the most common form of additional Tier 1 capital is noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and the most common form of Tier 2 capital is subordinated notes and a portion of the allowance for loan and lease losses, in each case, subject to the Basel III Capital Rules’ specific requirements.

Under the Basel III Capital Rules, the following are the initial minimum capital ratios applicable to the Company and the Bank:

4.0% Tier 1 leverage ratio;

4.5% CET1 to risk-weighted assets;

6.0% Tier 1 capital (that is, CET1 plus Additional Tier 1 capital) to risk-weighted assets;

8.0% total capital (that is, Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets.

The Basel III Capital Rules also introduced a “capital conservation buffer,” composed entirely of CET1, on top of these minimum risk-weighted asset ratios.

The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress.

Banking institutions with a ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the capital conservation buffer will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases and compensation based on the amount of the shortfall.

The implementation of the capital conservation buffer began on January 1, 2016 and was phased in over a three-year period (increasing by that amount on each subsequent January 1, until it reached 2.5% on January 1, 2019).

The Company and the Bank must now maintain the following minimum capital ratios:

(iv) expand the scope of the deductions from and adjustments to capital, as compared to existing regulations.

Under the Basel III Capital Rules, for most banking organizations, the most common form of additional Tier 1 capital is noncumulative

perpetual preferred stock and the most common form of Tier 2 capital is subordinated notes and a portion of the allowance for credit losses, in each case, subject to the Basel III Capital Rules’ specific requirements.

Under the Basel III Capital Rules, the following are the minimum capital ratios applicable to the Company and the Bank:

4.0% Tier 1 leverage ratio;

4 unchanged sentences

These include, for example, the requirement that:

(i) mortgage servicing rights;

(ii) deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences that could not be realized through net operating loss carrybacks;

and (iii) significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities be deducted from CET1 to the extent that any one such category exceeds 10% of CET1 or all such items, in the aggregate, exceed 15% of CET1.

Implementation of the deductions and other adjustments to CET1 began on January 1, 2015 and has been fully phased-in over a four-year period ended on January 1, 2019.

Under the Basel III Capital Rules, the effects of certain accumulated other comprehensive income or loss items are not excluded for the purposes of determining regulatory capital ratios;

however, non-advanced approaches banking organizations (i.e., banking organizations with less than $250 billion in total consolidated assets or with less than $10 billion of on-balance sheet foreign exposures), including the Company and the Bank, may make a one-time permanent election to exclude these items.

The Company and the Bank made this election in the first quarter of 2015’s call reports in order to avoid significant variations in the level of capital depending upon the impact of interest rate fluctuations on the fair value of its available-for-sale investment securities portfolio.

The Basel III Capital Rules prescribe a new standardized approach for risk weightings that expands the risk weighting categories from the previous four Basel I-derived categories (0%, 20%, 50% and 100%) to a larger and more risk-sensitive number of categories, generally ranging from 0% for U.S.

(i) mortgage servicing rights, (ii) deferred tax

assets arising from temporary differences that could not be realized through net operating loss carrybacks, and (iii) significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities be deducted from CET1 to the extent that any one such category

exceeds 10% of CET1 or all such items, in the aggregate, exceed 15% of CET1.

Under the Basel III Capital Rules, the effects of certain accumulated other comprehensive income or loss items are not excluded for the purposes of determining regulatory

capital ratios;

and the Bank, may make a one-time permanent election to exclude these items.

The Company and the Bank made this election in 2015 in order to avoid significant variations in the level of capital depending upon the impact of interest rate

fluctuations on the fair value of its available-for-sale investment securities portfolio, changes of which are included in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.

The Basel III Capital Rules prescribe a standardized approach for risk weightings that expands the risk weighting categories from the previous four Basel I-derived categories (0%, 20%, 50% and

100%) to a larger and more risk-sensitive number of categories, generally ranging from 0% for U.S.

Government and agency securities, to 600% for certain equity exposures, depending on the nature of the assets.

The new capital rules generally result in higher risk weights for a variety of asset classes.

The Basel III capital rules generally

result in higher risk weights for a variety of asset classes.

Additional aspects of the Basel III Capital Rules that are relevant to the Company and the Bank include:

consistent with the Basel I risk-based capital rules, assigning exposures secured by single-family residential properties to either a 50% risk weight for first-lien mortgages that meet prudent underwriting standards or a 100% risk weight category for all other mortgages;

category for all other mortgages;

providing for a 20% credit conversion factor for the unused portion of a commitment with an original maturity of one year or less that is not unconditionally cancellable (set at 0% under the Basel I risk-based capital rules);

assigning a 150% risk weight to all exposures that are nonaccrual or 90 days or more past due (set at 100% under the Basel I risk-based capital rules), except for those secured by single-family residential properties, which will be assigned a 100% risk weight, consistent with the Basel I risk-based capital rules;

assigned a 100% risk weight, consistent with the Basel I risk-based capital rules;

applying a 150% risk weight instead of a 100% risk weight for certain high volatility commercial real estate acquisition, development and construction loans;

applying a 250% risk weight to the portion of mortgage servicing rights and deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences that could not be realized through net operating loss carrybacks that are not deducted from CET1 capital (set at 100% under the Basel I risk-based capital rules).

As of December 31, 2020, the Company’s and the Bank’s capital ratios exceeded the minimum capital adequacy guideline percentage requirements of the federal banking agencies for “well capitalized” institutions under the Basel III capital rules on a fully phased-in basis.

With respect to the Bank, the Basel III capital rules also revise the prompt corrective action regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.

In December 2017, the Basel Committee published standards that it described as the finalization of the Basel III post-crisis regulatory reforms, which standards are commonly referred to as Basel IV.

Among other things, these standards revise the Basel Committee’s standardized approach for credit risk (including the recalibration of the risk weights and the introduction of new capital requirements for certain “unconditionally cancellable commitments,” such as unused credit card lines of credit) and provides a new standardized approach for operational risk capital.

(set at 100% under the Basel I risk-based capital rules).

As of December 31, 2021, the Company’s and the Bank’s capital ratios exceeded the minimum capital adequacy guideline percentage requirements of the federal banking agencies for a “well

capitalized” institution under the Basel III capital rules on a fully phased-in basis.

With respect to the Bank, the Basel III capital rules also revise the prompt corrective action regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the FDIA.

In December 2017, the Basel Committee published standards that it described as the finalization of the Basel III post-crisis regulatory reforms, which standards are commonly referred to as Basel

commitments,” such as unused credit card lines of credit) and provides a new standardized approach for operational risk capital.

Under the Basel framework, these standards will generally be effective on January 1, 2022, with an aggregate output floor phasing in through January 1, 2027.

Under the current U.S.

capital rules, operational risk capital requirements and a capital floor apply only to advanced approaches institutions, and not to the Bank.

capital rules,

operational risk capital requirements and a capital floor apply only to advanced approaches institutions, and not to the Bank.

The impact of Basel IV on us will depend on how it is implemented by the federal bank regulators.

Prompt Corrective Action (“PCA”)

The Federal Deposit Insurance Act, as amended (“FDIA”), requires federal banking agencies to take PCA in respect of depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements.

The FDIA requires federal banking agencies to take PCA in respect of depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements.

The FDIA includes the following five capital tiers:

“well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized,” and “critically undercapitalized.” A depository institution’s capital tier will depend upon how its capital levels compare with various relevant capital measures and certain other factors, as established by regulation.

capital measures and certain other factors, as established by regulation.

The Basel III Capital Rules revised the PCA requirements effective January 1, 2015.

Under the revised PCA provisions of the FDIA, an insured depository institution generally will be classified in the following categories based on the capital measures indicated:

Capital Category

Capital Ratio

Common Equity

Tier 1 (CET1)

Capital Ratio

Leverage Ratio

Tangible Equity

Leverage Ratio

Well Capitalized

10% or greater

8% or greater

6.5% or greater

5% or greater

Adequately Capitalized

8% or greater

6% or greater

4.5% or greater

4% or greater

3% or greater

Undercapitalized

Less than 4.5%

Significantly Undercapitalized

Critically Undercapitalized

An institution may be downgraded to, or deemed to be in, a capital category that is lower than indicated by its capital ratios, if it is determined to be in an unsafe or unsound condition or if it receives an unsatisfactory examination rating with respect to certain matters.

A bank’s capital category is determined solely for the purpose of applying PCA regulations and the capital category may not constitute an accurate representation of the bank’s overall financial condition or prospects for other purposes.

The FDIA generally prohibits a depository institution from making any capital distributions (including payment of a dividend) or paying any management fee to its parent holding company, if the depository institution would thereafter be “undercapitalized.” “Undercapitalized” institutions are subject to growth limitations and are required to submit capital restoration plans.

If a depository institution fails to submit an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is “significantly undercapitalized.” “Significantly undercapitalized” depository institutions may be subject to a number of requirements and restrictions, including orders to sell sufficient voting stock to become “adequately capitalized,” requirements to reduce total assets, and cessation of receipt of deposits from correspondent banks.

“Critically undercapitalized” institutions are subject to the appointment of a receiver or conservator.

The capital classification of a bank holding company and a bank affects the frequency of regulatory examinations, the bank holding company’s and the bank’s ability to engage in certain activities and the deposit insurance premium paid by the bank.

As of December 31, 2020, we met the requirements to be “well-capitalized” based upon the aforementioned ratios for purposes of the prompt corrective action regulations, as currently in effect.

Under the revised PCA provisions of the FDIA, an insured depository institution generally

will be classified in the following categories based on the capital measures indicated:

Significantly

Risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets

Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets

CET1 capital to risk-weighted assets

Tier 1 leverage capital ratio

Tangible equity to assets

Supplemental leverage ratio

An institution may be downgraded to, or deemed to be in, a capital category that is lower than indicated by its capital ratios, if it is determined to be operating in an unsafe or unsound

condition or if it receives an unsatisfactory examination rating with respect to certain matters.

A bank’s capital category is determined solely for the purpose of applying PCA regulations and the capital category may not constitute an accurate

representation of the bank’s overall financial condition or prospects for other purposes.

The FDIA generally prohibits a depository institution from making any capital distributions (including payment of a dividend) or paying any management fee to its parent holding company, if the

depository institution would thereafter be “undercapitalized.” “Undercapitalized” institutions are subject to growth limitations and are required to submit capital restoration plans.

If a depository institution fails to submit an acceptable plan,

it is treated as if it is “significantly undercapitalized.” “Significantly undercapitalized” depository institutions may be subject to a number of requirements and restrictions, including orders to sell sufficient voting stock to become “adequately

capitalized,” requirements to reduce total assets, and cessation of receipt of deposits from correspondent banks.

“Critically undercapitalized” institutions are subject to the appointment of a receiver or conservator by the bank regulators.

The capital classification of a bank holding company and a bank affects the frequency of regulatory examinations, the bank holding company’s and the bank’s ability to engage in certain activities

and the deposit insurance premium paid by the bank to the FDIC.

As of December 31, 2021, we met the requirements to be classified as a “well-capitalized” based upon the aforementioned ratios for purposes of the prompt corrective action regulations,

as currently in effect.

The Community Bank Leverage Ratio

On November 4, 2019, the federal banking agencies jointly issued a final rule that provides for an optional, simplified measure of capital adequacy, the community bank leverage ratio (“CBLR”) framework, for qualifying community banking organizations consistent with Section 201 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act.

The CBLR framework is designed to reduce burden by removing the requirements for calculating and reporting risk-based capital ratios for qualifying community banking organizations that opt into the framework.

On November 4, 2019, the federal banking agencies jointly issued a final rule that provides for an optional, simplified measure of capital adequacy, known as the community bank leverage ratio

(“CBLR”) framework, for qualifying community banking organizations consistent with Section 201 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act.

The CBLR framework is designed to reduce the capital burden by removing the

requirements for calculating and reporting risk-based capital ratios for qualifying community-banking organizations that opt into the framework.

The final rule was effective on January 1, 2020.

In order to qualify for the CBLR framework, a community banking organization must have a tier 1 leverage ratio of greater than 9%, less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets, off-balance-sheet exposures of 25% or less of total consolidated assets, and trading assets and liabilities of 5% or less of total consolidated assets.

A qualifying community banking organization that opts into the CBLR framework and meets all requirements under the framework will be considered to have met the well-capitalized ratio requirements under the Prompt Corrective Action regulations.

Such a community banking organization would not be subject to other risk-based and leverage capital requirements (including the Basel III and Basel IV requirements).

In order to qualify for the CBLR framework, a community banking organization must have a tier 1 leverage ratio of greater than 9%, less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets,

off-balance-sheet exposures of 25% or less of total consolidated assets, and trading assets and liabilities of 5% or less of total consolidated assets.

A qualifying community banking organization that opts into the CBLR framework and meets all

requirements under the framework will be considered to have met the well-capitalized ratio requirements under the Prompt Corrective Action regulations.

Such a community banking organization would not be subject to other risk-based and leverage

capital requirements (including the Basel III and Basel IV requirements).

The CBLR is determined by dividing a financial institution’s tangible equity capital by its average total consolidated assets.

The rule describes what is included in tangible equity capital and average total consolidated assets.

The rule describes what is included in tangible

equity capital and average total consolidated assets.

The CBLR framework was available for banks to use in their March 31, 2020, call report.

A CBLR bank that ceases to meet any of the qualifying criteria in a future period but maintains a leverage ratio greater than 8% will be allowed a grace period of two reporting periods to satisfy the CBLR qualifying criteria or to otherwise comply with the generally applicable capital requirements.

Further, a CBLR bank may opt out of the framework at any time, without restriction, by reverting to the generally applicable capital requirements.

A CBLR bank that ceases to meet any of the qualifying criteria in a future period but maintains a leverage

ratio greater than 8% will be allowed a grace period of two reporting periods to satisfy the CBLR qualifying criteria or to otherwise comply with the generally applicable capital requirements.

Further, a CBLR bank may opt out of the framework at

any time, without restriction, by reverting to the generally applicable capital requirements.

The Company and Bank did not opt into the CBLR framework.

Anti-Money Laundering and Office of Foreign Assets Control Regulation

Title III of the United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “Patriot Act”), is designed to deny terrorists and criminals the ability to obtain access to the U.S.

obtain access to the U.S.

financial system and has significant implications for depository institutions, brokers, dealers and other businesses involved in the transfer of money.

1 unchanged sentence

(i) customer identification programs;

(ii) money laundering;

(iii) terrorist financing;

2 unchanged sentences

and (vi) cooperation between financial institutions and law enforcement authorities.

Regulatory authorities routinely examine financial institutions for compliance with these obligations, and failure of a financial institution to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, or to comply with all of the relevant laws or regulations, could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution, including causing applicable bank regulatory authorities not to approve merger or acquisition transactions when regulatory approval is required or to prohibit such transactions even if approval is not required.

Regulatory authorities

routinely examine financial institutions for compliance with these obligations, and failure of a financial institution to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, or to comply with all of the

relevant laws or regulations, could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution, including causing applicable bank regulatory authorities not to approve merger or acquisition transactions when regulatory approval is required

or to prohibit such transactions even if approval is not required.

Regulatory authorities have imposed cease and desist orders and civil money penalties against institutions found to be violating these obligations.

Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”), administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions against targeted foreign countries and regimes under authority of various laws, including designated foreign countries, nationals and others.

Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions against targeted foreign countries and regimes under authority of various laws, including designated

foreign countries, nationals and others.

OFAC publishes lists of specially designated targets and countries.

Financial institutions are responsible for, among other things, blocking accounts of and transactions with such targets and countries, prohibiting unlicensed trade and financial transactions with them and reporting blocked transactions after their occurrence.

Banking regulators examine banks for compliance with the economic sanctions regulations administered by OFAC and failure of a financial institution to maintain and implement adequate OFAC programs, or to comply with all of the relevant laws or regulations, could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution.

Financial institutions are responsible for, among other things, blocking accounts of and transactions with such targets and countries,

prohibiting unlicensed trade and financial transactions with them and reporting blocked transactions after their occurrence.

Banking regulators examine banks for compliance with the economic sanctions regulations administered by OFAC and failure of a

financial institution to maintain and implement adequate OFAC programs, or to comply with all of the relevant laws or regulations, could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution.

Privacy Restrictions

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”) requires financial institutions in the U.S.

to provide certain privacy disclosures to customers and consumers, to comply with certain restrictions on the sharing and usage of personally identifiable information, and to implement and maintain commercially reasonable customer information safeguarding standards.

The Company believes that it complies with all provisions of the GLBA and all implementing regulations and the Bank has developed appropriate policies and procedures to meet its responsibilities in connection with the privacy provisions of GLBA.

to provide certain privacy disclosures to customers and consumers, to comply with certain restrictions on the sharing and usage of

personally identifiable information, and to implement and maintain commercially reasonable customer information safeguarding standards.

privacy provisions of GLBA.

Dividends and Other Transfer of Funds

1 unchanged sentence

The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank.

The Bank is subject to various statutory and regulatory restrictions on its ability to pay dividends to the Company.

The Bank is subject to various statutory and regulatory restrictions on

its ability to pay dividends to the Company.

Under such restrictions, the amount available for payment of dividends to the Company by the Bank totaled $143.2 million at December 31, 2021.

During 2020, the Bank paid $19.9 million in dividends to the Company.

During 2021, the Bank paid $9.9 million in dividends to the

The FDIC and the DFPI also have authority to prohibit the Bank from engaging in activities that, in their opinion, constitute unsafe or unsound practices in conducting its business.

It is possible, depending upon the financial condition of the bank in question and other factors, that the FDIC or the DFPI could assert that the payment of dividends or other payments might, under some circumstances, be an unsafe or unsound practice.

Further, the FRB and the FDIC have established guidelines with respect to the maintenance of appropriate levels of capital by banks or bank holding companies under their jurisdiction.

Compliance with the standards set forth in such guidelines and the restrictions that are or may be imposed under the prompt corrective action provisions of federal law could limit the amount of dividends that the Bank or the Company may pay.

An insured depository institution is prohibited from paying management fees to any controlling persons or, with certain limited exceptions, making capital distributions if after such transaction the institution would be undercapitalized.

It is possible, depending upon the

financial condition of the bank in question and other factors, that the FDIC or the DFPI could assert that the payment of dividends or other payments might, under some circumstances, be an unsafe or unsound practice.

Further, the FRB and the FDIC

have established guidelines with respect to the maintenance of appropriate levels of capital by banks and bank holding companies under their jurisdiction.

Compliance with the standards set forth in such guidelines and the restrictions that are or may

be imposed under the prompt corrective action provisions of federal law could limit the amount of dividends that the Bank or the Company may pay.

An insured depository institution is prohibited from paying management fees to any controlling persons

or, with certain limited exceptions, making capital distributions if after such transaction the institution would be undercapitalized.

The DFPI may impose similar limitations on the Bank.

See “Prompt Corrective Action” and “Capital Standards” for a discussion of these additional restrictions on capital distributions.

See “Prompt Corrective Action” and “Capital Standards”, above,

for a discussion of these additional restrictions on capital distributions.

Transactions with Affiliates

The Bank is subject to certain restrictions imposed by federal law on any extensions of credit to, or the issuance of a guarantee or letter of credit on behalf of the Company or other affiliates, the purchase of, or investments in stock or other securities thereof, the taking of such securities as collateral for loans & leases, and the purchase of assets of the Company or other affiliates.

Such restrictions prevent the Company and other affiliates from borrowing from the Bank unless the loans are secured by marketable obligations of designated amounts.

Further, such secured loans and investments by the Bank to or in the Company or to or in any other affiliates are limited, individually, to 10% of the Bank’s capital and surplus (as defined by federal regulations), and such secured loans and investments are limited, in the aggregate, to 20% of the Bank’s capital and surplus (as defined by federal regulations).

In addition, the Company and its operating subsidiaries generally may not purchase a low-quality asset from an affiliate, and other specified transactions between the Company or its operating subsidiaries and an affiliate must be on terms and conditions that are consistent with safe and sound banking practices.

Also, the Company and its operating subsidiaries may engage in transactions with affiliates only on terms and under conditions that are substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the Company or its subsidiaries, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with (or that in good faith would be offered to) non-affiliated companies.

investments in stock or other securities of the Company or other affiliates, the taking of such securities as collateral for loans and leases, and the purchase of assets of the Company or other affiliates.

Such restrictions prevent the Company and

other affiliates from borrowing from the Bank unless the loans are secured by marketable obligations of designated amounts.

Further, such secured loans and investments by the Bank to or in the Company or to or in any other affiliates are limited,

individually, to 10% of the Bank’s capital and surplus (as defined by federal regulations), and such secured loans and investments are limited, in the aggregate as to all affiliates, to 20% of the Bank’s capital and surplus (as defined by federal

regulations).

affiliate must be on terms and conditions that are consistent with safe and sound banking practices.

subsidiaries, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with (or that in good faith would be offered to) non-affiliated companies.

California law also imposes certain restrictions with respect to transactions with affiliates.

3 unchanged sentences

The federal banking agencies have adopted guidelines that establish operational and managerial standards to promote the safety and soundness of federally insured depository institutions.

The guidelines set forth standards for internal controls, information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, compensation, fees and benefits, asset quality and earnings.

guidelines set forth standards for internal controls, information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation;

credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, compensation, fees and benefits, asset quality and earnings.

In general, the safety and soundness guidelines prescribe the goals to be achieved in each area, and each institution is responsible for establishing its own procedures to achieve those goals.

If an institution fails to comply with any of the standards set forth in the guidelines, the financial institution’s primary federal regulator may require the institution to submit a plan for achieving and maintaining compliance.

If a financial institution fails to submit an acceptable compliance plan, or fails in any material respect to implement a compliance plan that has been accepted by its primary federal regulator, the regulator is required to issue an order directing the institution to cure the deficiency.

Until the deficiency cited in the regulator’s order is cured, the regulator may restrict the financial institution’s rate of growth, require the financial institution to increase its capital, restrict the rates the institution pays on deposits or require the institution to take any action the regulator deems appropriate under the circumstances.

Noncompliance with the standards established by the safety and soundness guidelines may also constitute grounds for other enforcement action by the federal bank regulatory agencies, including cease and desist orders and civil money penalty assessments.

During the past decade, the bank regulatory agencies have increasingly emphasized the importance of sound risk management processes and strong internal controls when evaluating the activities of the financial institutions they supervise.

Properly managing risks has been identified as critical to the conduct of safe and sound banking activities and has become even more important as new technologies, product innovation, and the size and speed of financial transactions have changed the nature of banking markets.

The agencies have identified a spectrum of risks facing a banking institution including, but not limited to, credit, market, liquidity, operational, legal, and reputational risk.

In particular, recent regulatory pronouncements have focused on operational risk, which arises from the potential that inadequate information systems, operational problems, breaches in internal controls, fraud, or unforeseen catastrophes will result in unexpected losses.

New products and services, third-party risk management and cyber-security are critical sources of operational risk that financial institutions are expected to address in the current environment.

an institution fails to comply with any of the standards set forth in the guidelines, the financial institution’s primary federal regulator may require the institution to submit a plan for achieving and maintaining compliance.

If a financial

institution fails to submit an acceptable compliance plan, or fails in any material respect to implement a compliance plan that has been accepted by its primary federal regulator, the regulator is required to issue an order directing the

institution to cure the deficiency.

the institution pays on deposits or require the institution to take any action the regulator deems appropriate under the circumstances.

Noncompliance with the standards established by the safety and soundness guidelines may also constitute grounds

for other enforcement action by the federal bank regulatory agencies, including cease and desist orders and civil money penalty assessments.

Since the financial crisis of 2008-2009, the bank regulatory agencies have increasingly emphasized the importance of sound risk management processes and strong internal controls when evaluating

the activities of the financial institutions they supervise.

Properly managing risks has been identified as critical to the conduct of safe and sound banking activities and has become even more important as new technologies, product innovation, and

the size and speed of financial transactions have changed the nature of banking markets.

The agencies have identified a spectrum of risks facing a banking institution including, but not limited to, credit, market, liquidity, operational, legal, and

reputational risk.

In particular, recent regulatory pronouncements have focused on operational risk, which arises from the potential that inadequate information system, operational problems, breaches in internal

controls, fraud, or unforeseen catastrophes will result in unexpected losses.

New products and services, third-party risk management and cyber-security are critical sources of operational risk that financial institutions are expected to address in

the current environment.

The Bank is expected to have active board and senior management oversight;

1 unchanged sentence

adequate risk measurement, monitoring, and management information systems;

and comprehensive internal controls.

and comprehensive internal

Deposit Insurance

1 unchanged sentence

The premiums fund the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”).

The FDIC assesses a quarterly deposit insurance premium on each insured institution based on risk characteristics of the institution and may also impose special assessments in emergency situations.

Effective July 1, 2016, the FDIC changed the deposit insurance assessment system for banks, such as the Bank, with less than $10 billion in assets that have been federally insured for at least five years.

Among other changes, the FDIC eliminated risk categories for such banks and now uses the “financial ratios method” to determine assessment rates for all such banks.

The FDIC assesses a quarterly

deposit insurance premium on each insured institution based on risk characteristics of the institution and may also impose special assessments in emergency situations.

Effective July 1, 2016, the FDIC changed the deposit insurance assessment system

for banks, such as the Bank, with less than $10 billion in assets that have been federally insured for at least five years.

Among other changes, the FDIC eliminated risk categories for such banks and now uses the “financial ratios method” to

determine assessment rates for all such banks.

Under the financial ratios method, the FDIC determines assessment rates based on a combination of financial data and supervisory ratings that estimate a bank’s probability of failure within three years.

1 unchanged sentence

The Dodd-Frank Act required the FDIC to ensure that the DIF reserve ratio, which is the amount in the DIF as a percentage of all DIF-insured deposits, reached 1.35% by September 3, 2020.

The Dodd-Frank Act also altered the minimum designated reserve ratio for the DIF, increasing the minimum from 1.15% to 1.35%, and eliminated the requirement that the FDIC pay dividends to depository institutions when the reserve ratio exceeds certain thresholds.

Dodd-Frank Act also altered the minimum designated reserve ratio for the DIF, increasing the minimum from 1.15% to 1.35%, and eliminated the requirement that the FDIC pay dividends to depository institutions when the reserve ratio exceeds certain

At least semi-annually, the FDIC updates its loss and income projections for the DIF and, if needed, may increase or decrease the assessment rates, following notice and comment on proposed rulemaking if required.

As a result, the Bank’s FDIC deposit insurance premiums could increase.

The Bank’s FDIC premiums were $517,000 in 2020 and $624,000 in 2019.

As a result, the Bank’s

FDIC deposit insurance premiums could increase.

The Bank’s FDIC premiums were $1.2 million, $517,000, and $624,000 for the three years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

In 2020 and 2019, the Bank’s FDIC premiums were reduced by a one-time small

bank assessment credit applied by the FDIC.

This assessment credit was not available in 2021.

Future increases in insurance premiums could have adverse effects on the operating expenses and results of operations of the Company.

Management cannot predict what insurance assessment rates will be in the future.

Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order, or condition imposed by the FDIC or the Bank’s primary regulator.

Management of the Company is not aware of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of the Company’s deposit insurance.

Management cannot

predict what insurance assessment rates will be in the future.

Insurance of a bank’s deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated

any applicable law, regulation, rule, order, or condition imposed by the FDIC or the Bank’s primary regulator.

Management of the Company is not aware of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of the Company’s deposit

Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) and Fair Lending

The Bank is subject to certain fair lending requirements involving lending, investing, and other CRA activities.

CRA requires each insured depository institution to identify the communities served by the institution’s offices and to identify the types of credit and investments the institution is prepared to extend within such communities including low and moderate-income neighborhoods.

It also requires the institution’s regulators to assess the institution’s performance in meeting the credit needs of its community and to take such assessment into consideration in reviewing applications for mergers, acquisitions, relocation of existing branches, opening of new branches, and other transactions.

A bank may be subject to substantial penalties and corrective measures for a violation of certain fair lending laws.

CRA requires each insured depository institution to identify the communities served by the institution’s

offices and to identify the types of credit and investments the institution is prepared to extend within such communities including low and moderate-income neighborhoods.

It also requires the institution’s regulators to assess the institution’s

performance in meeting the credit needs of its community and to consider such assessment in reviewing applications for mergers, acquisitions, relocation of existing branches, opening of new branches, and other transactions.

A bank may be subject to

substantial penalties and corrective measures for a violation of certain fair lending laws.

A bank’s compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act is assessed using an evaluation system, which bases CRA ratings on an institution’s lending, service and investment performance.

An unsatisfactory rating may be the basis for denying a merger application.

The Bank’s latest CRA examination was completed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in May 2019 and the Bank received an overall Outstanding rating in complying with its CRA obligations.

On December 12, 2019, the FDIC and the OCC announced a proposal to modernize the agencies’ regulations under the CRA that have not been substantively updated for nearly 25 years.

On May 20, 2020, the OCC issued a final rule for CRA Modernization, however, the FDIC did not join the OCC and finalize the rule.

An unsatisfactory rating may be

the basis for denying a merger application.

The Bank’s latest CRA examination was completed by the FDIC in May 2019 and the Bank received an overall Outstanding rating in complying with its CRA obligations.

On December 12, 2019, the FDIC and the

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) announced a proposal to modernize the agencies’ regulations under the CRA that have not been substantively updated for nearly 25 years.

On May 20, 2020, the OCC issued a final rule for CRA

modernization;

however, the FDIC did not join the OCC and finalize the rule.

Consumer Protection Regulations

Banks and other financial institutions are subject to numerous laws and regulations intended to protect consumers in their transactions with banks.

These laws include, among others, laws regarding unfair and deceptive acts and practices and usury laws, as well as the following consumer protection statutes:

Truth in Lending Act, Truth in Savings Act, Electronic Fund Transfer Act, Expedited Funds Availability Act, Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, Fair Housing Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, Right to Financial Privacy Act, Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, Military Lending Act and Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.

These laws include, among others, laws

regarding unfair and deceptive acts and practices and usury laws, as well as the following consumer protection statutes:

Truth in Lending Act, Truth in Savings Act, Electronic Fund Transfer Act, Expedited Funds Availability Act, Equal Credit

Opportunity Act, Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, Fair Housing Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, Right to Financial Privacy Act, Servicemembers Civil

Relief Act, Military Lending Act and Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.

Many states and local jurisdictions have consumer protection laws analogous, and in addition, to those listed above.

These federal, state and local laws regulate the manner in which financial institutions deal with customers when taking deposits, making loans or conducting other types of transactions.

Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could give rise to regulatory sanctions, customer rescission rights, action by state and local attorneys general and civil or criminal liability.

Failure to comply with consumer protection requirements may also result in our failure to obtain any required bank regulatory approval for merger or acquisition transactions we may wish to pursue or our prohibition from engaging in such transactions even if approval is not required.

The structure of federal consumer protection regulation applicable to all providers of consumer financial products and services changed significantly on July 21, 2011, when the CFPB commenced operations to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws.

The consumer protection provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and the examination, supervision and enforcement of those laws and implementing regulations by the CFPB have created a more intense and complex environment for consumer finance regulation.

The CFPB has significant authority to implement and enforce federal consumer protection laws and new requirements for financial services products provided for in the Dodd-Frank Act, as well as the authority to identify and prohibit unfair, deceptive or abusive acts and practices.

These federal, state and local laws regulate the manner in which financial

institutions deal with customers when taking deposits, making loans or conducting other types of transactions.

Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could give rise to regulatory sanctions, customer rescission rights, action by state and

local attorneys general and civil or criminal liability.

Failure to comply with consumer protection requirements may also result in our failure to obtain any required bank regulatory approval for merger or acquisition transactions we may wish to

pursue or our prohibition from engaging in such transactions even if approval is not required.

The structure of federal consumer protection regulation applicable to all providers of consumer financial products and services changed significantly on July 21, 2011, when the CFPB commenced

operations to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws.

The consumer protection provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and the examination, supervision and enforcement of those laws and implementing regulations by the CFPB have created a more

intense and complex environment for consumer finance regulation.

The CFPB has significant authority to implement and enforce federal consumer protection laws and new requirements for financial services products provided for in the Dodd-Frank Act,

as well as the authority to identify and prohibit unfair, deceptive or abusive acts and practices.

The review of products and practices to prevent such acts and practices is a continuing focus of the CFPB, and of banking regulators more broadly.

The ultimate impact of this heightened scrutiny is uncertain but could result in changes to pricing, practices, products and procedures.

It could also result in increased costs related to regulatory oversight, supervision and examination, additional remediation efforts and possible penalties.

In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act provides the CFPB with broad supervisory, examination and enforcement authority over various consumer financial products and services, including the ability to require reimbursements and other payments to customers for alleged legal violations and to impose significant penalties, as well as injunctive relief that prohibits lenders from engaging in allegedly unlawful practices.

The CFPB also has the authority to obtain cease and desist orders providing for affirmative relief or monetary penalties.

It could also result in increased costs related to regulatory oversight, supervision and examination,

additional remediation efforts and possible penalties.

In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act provides the CFPB with broad supervisory, examination and enforcement authority over various consumer financial products and services, including the ability to

require reimbursements and other payments to customers for alleged legal violations and to impose significant penalties, as well as injunctive relief that prohibits lenders from engaging in allegedly unlawful practices.

The CFPB also has the

authority to obtain cease and desist orders providing for affirmative relief or monetary penalties.

The Dodd-Frank Act does not prevent states from adopting stricter consumer protection standards.

State regulation of financial products and potential enforcement actions could also adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

State regulation of financial products and

potential enforcement actions could also adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

The CFPB is authorized to issue rules for both bank and nonbank companies that offer consumer financial products and services, subject to consultation with the prudential banking regulators.

In general, however, banks with assets of $10 billion or less, such as the Bank, will continue to be examined for consumer compliance by their primary bank regulator.

general, however, banks with assets of $10 billion or less, such as the Bank, will continue to be examined for consumer compliance by their primary bank regulator.

Notice and Approval Requirements Related to Control

Banking laws impose notice, approval and ongoing regulatory requirements on any stockholder or other party that seeks to acquire direct or indirect “control” of an FDIC-insured depository institution.

These laws include the BHCA and the Change in Bank Control Act.

Among other things, these laws require regulatory filings by a stockholder or other party that seeks to acquire direct or indirect "control" of an FDIC-insured depository institution or bank holding company.

include the BHCA and the Change in Bank Control Act.

Among other things, these laws require regulatory filings by a stockholder or other party that seeks to acquire direct or indirect “control” of an FDIC-insured depository institution or bank

holding company.

The determination whether an investor “controls” a depository institution is based on all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the investment.

As a general matter, a party is deemed to control a depository institution or other company if the party owns or controls 25% or more of any class of voting stock.

Subject to rebuttal, a party may be presumed to control a depository institution or other company if the investor owns or controls 10% or more of any class of voting stock.

As a general matter, a party is deemed to control a depository institution or other

company if the party owns or controls 25% or more of any class of voting stock.

Subject to rebuttal, a party may be presumed to control a depository institution or other company if the investor owns or controls 10% or more of any class of voting

Ownership by family members, affiliated parties, or parties acting in concert, is typically aggregated for these purposes.

If a party's ownership of the Company were to exceed certain thresholds, the investor could be deemed to "control" the Company for regulatory purposes.

If a party’s ownership of the Company were to exceed certain thresholds, the investor could be deemed to “control” the

Company for regulatory purposes.

This could subject the investor to regulatory filings or other regulatory consequences.

3 unchanged sentences

Incentive Compensation

In 2010, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued comprehensive guidance intended to ensure that the incentive compensation policies of banking organizations do not undermine the safety and soundness of those organizations by encouraging excessive risk-taking.

The incentive compensation guidance sets expectations for banking organizations concerning their incentive compensation arrangements and related risk-management, control and governance processes.

In 2010, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued comprehensive guidance intended to ensure that the incentive compensation policies of banking organizations do not undermine the safety and

soundness of those organizations by encouraging excessive risk-taking.

The incentive compensation guidance sets expectations for banking organizations concerning their incentive compensation arrangements and related risk-management, control and

governance processes.

The incentive compensation guidance, which covers all employees that have the ability to materially affect the risk profile of an organization, either individually or as part of a group, is based upon three primary principles:

2 unchanged sentences

and (3) strong corporate governance.

Any deficiencies in compensation practices that are identified may be incorporated into the organization’s supervisory ratings, which can affect its ability to make acquisitions or take other actions.

In addition, under the incentive compensation guidance, a banking organization’s federal supervisor may initiate enforcement action if the organization’s incentive compensation arrangements pose a risk to the safety and soundness of the organization.

In 2016, several federal financial agencies (including the FRB and FDIC) re-proposed restrictions on incentive-based compensation pursuant to Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Act for financial institutions with $1 billion or more in total consolidated assets.

For institutions with at least $1 billion but less than $50 billion in total consolidated assets, the proposal would impose principles-based restrictions that are broadly consistent with existing interagency guidance on incentive-based compensation.

Any deficiencies in compensation practices that are identified may be incorporated into the organization’s

supervisory ratings, which can affect its ability to make acquisitions or take other actions.

In addition, under the incentive compensation guidance, a banking organization’s federal supervisor may initiate enforcement action if the organization’s

incentive compensation arrangements pose a risk to the safety and soundness of the organization.

In 2016, several federal financial agencies (including the FRB and FDIC) re-proposed restrictions on incentive-based compensation pursuant to Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Act for financial

institutions with $1 billion or more in total consolidated assets.

For institutions with at least $1 billion but less than $50 billion in total consolidated assets, the proposal would impose principles-based restrictions that are broadly consistent with existing

interagency guidance on incentive-based compensation.

Such institutions would be prohibited from entering into incentive compensation arrangements that encourage inappropriate risks by the institution:

(i) by providing an executive officer, employee, director, or principal shareholder with excessive compensation, fees, or benefits;

(i) by providing an executive officer,

employee, director, or principal shareholder with excessive compensation, fees, or benefits;

or (ii) that could lead to material financial loss to the institution.

The comment period for these proposed regulations has closed, but a final rule has not been published.

Depending upon the outcome of the rule making process, the application of this rule to us could require us to revise our compensation strategy, increase our administrative costs and adversely affect our ability to recruit and retain qualified employees.

Further, as discussed above, the Basel III Capital Rules limit discretionary bonus payments to bank executives if the institution’s regulatory capital ratios fail to exceed certain thresholds that started being phased in on January 1, 2016.

The comment period for these proposed regulations has closed, but a final rule has

not been published.

retain qualified employees.

on January 1, 2016.

Available Information

Company reports filed with the SEC including the annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and ownership reports filed by directors, executive officers and principal stockholders can be accessed through the Company’s website at http://www.fmbonline.com.

and principal stockholders can be accessed through the Company’s website at http://www.fmbonline.com.

The link to the SEC is on the About Us page.

The Company’s reports may also be accessed at the SEC’s Internet website (http://www.sec.gov).

The Company’s reports may also be accessed at the SEC’s

Internet website (http://www.sec.gov).

Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.

What changed 10-K

Item 1. Business