What changed in this filing

/stocks — the workspaceLOADING

Item 1A. Risk Factors

2022-03-08 compared with 2021-03-15 · 1339 added, 3102 removed, 169 unchanged (96% of the section changed)

Risk Factors.

our common stock involves a high degree of risk.

You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and

the other information in this Annual Report, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes, as well as

our other public filings with the SEC, before making an investment in our common stock.

Our business, financial condition, results

of operations and prospects could be materially and adversely affected if any of these risks occurs, and as a result, the market

price of our common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.

This Annual Report also contains forward-looking

statements that involve risks and uncertainties.

See “Forward-Looking Statements.”

Our actual results could differ

materially and adversely from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those

set forth below.

Risks Related to

Our long-term

growth depends on our ability to enhance our products, expand our product indications and develop, acquire and commercialize additional

product offerings.

Our industry is highly

competitive and subject to rapid change and technological advancements.

Competition intensifies as technical advances in each field

are made and become more widely known.

We can give no assurance that others will not develop products, services and processes with

significant advantages over the products, services and processes that we offer or are seeking to develop.

It is, therefore, important

to our business that we continue to enhance our existing product offerings, expand our product indications and develop or otherwise

introduce and successfully commercialize new products.

Developing, acquiring and commercializing products is expensive and time-consuming

and could divert management’s attention away from our core business.

Even if we are successful in developing additional products,

the success of any new product offering or enhancements to any of our existing products will depend on several factors, including

our ability to:

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.

You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and the other information in this Annual Report, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes, as well as our other public filings with the SEC, before making an investment in our common stock.

Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and adversely affected if any of these risks occurs, and as a result, the market price of our common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.

This Annual Report also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.

See “Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth below.

Risks Related to Our Business

Our long-term growth depends on our ability to enhance our products, expand our product indications and develop, acquire and commercialize additional product offerings.

Our industry is highly competitive and subject to rapid change and technological advancements.

Competition intensifies as technical advances in each field are made and become more widely known.

We can give no assurance that others will not develop products, services and processes with significant advantages over the products, services and processes that we offer or are seeking to develop.

It is, therefore, important to our business that we continue to enhance our existing product offerings, expand our product indications and develop or otherwise introduce and successfully commercialize new products.

Developing, acquiring and commercializing products is expensive and time-consuming and could divert management’s attention away from our core business.

Even if we are successful in developing additional products, the success of any new product offering or enhancements to any of our existing products will depend on several factors, including our ability to:

● properly identify and anticipate physician and patient needs;

2 unchanged sentences

● develop an effective and dedicated sales and marketing team;

enter into successful agreements with commercial partners, independent sales agents and other third

parties where it is beneficial for us to do so;

adequately protect our intellectual property, avoid infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating

the intellectual property rights of third parties and obtain and maintain necessary intellectual property licenses from third parties;

demonstrate, if required, the safety and efficacy of new products with data from pre-clinical studies

and clinical trials;

obtain the necessary regulatory clearances or approvals for new products, product enhancements

and expanded indications;

maintain full compliance with FDA, European Union Medical Devices regulations and other regulatory

requirements applicable to new devices or products or modifications of existing devices or products;

● enter into successful agreements with commercial partners, independent sales agents and other third parties where it is beneficial for us to do so;

● adequately protect our intellectual property, avoid infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating the intellectual property rights of third parties and obtain and maintain necessary intellectual property licenses from third parties;

● demonstrate, if required, the safety and efficacy of new products with data from pre-clinical and clinical studies;

● obtain the necessary regulatory clearances, certifications or approvals for new products, product enhancements and expanded indications;

● maintain full compliance with FDA, European Union (“EU”) medical devices regulations and other regulatory requirements applicable to new devices or products or modifications of existing devices or products;

● provide adequate training to potential users of our products;

1 unchanged sentence

● otherwise compete effectively against products and enhancements developed by our competitors.

If we are not successful

in expanding our indications and developing, acquiring and commercializing new products and product enhancements, our ability to

increase our net sales may be impaired, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results

of operations.

In addition, our research and development efforts may require a substantial investment of time and resources before

we are adequately able to determine the commercial viability of a new product, technology or other innovation.

Even if we are able

to successfully develop and commercialize new product offerings or enhancements, they may be quickly rendered obsolete by changing

customer preferences or the introduction by our competitors of products embodying new technologies or features and/or otherwise

not produce sales in excess of the costs of development, any of which could also materially and adversely affect our business,

financial condition and results of operations.

Furthermore, to the extent we seek to enhance our products and broaden our product

portfolio through acquisitions or other commercial transactions, we will be subject to additional risks.

See “—

regularly evaluate opportunities to make acquisitions of, investments in, and licenses or other commercial arrangements involving,

other companies or technologies, and to enter into other strategic transactions.

These transactions entail significant risks .”

A substantial

portion of our net sales is generated through our commercial partners and independent sales agents, which subjects us to various

We currently rely

on the efforts of our commercial partners and independent sales agents to generate a substantial portion of our net sales, and

we expect to continue to rely on these third parties to generate a substantial portion of our net sales in the future while we

work to grow our direct sales force.

As a result, the impairment or termination of these relationships for any reason, or the failure

of these parties to diligently sell our products and comply with applicable laws and regulations, could materially and adversely

affect our ability to generate revenue and profits.

Because our commercial partners and independent sales agents control the relationships

with our end customers, if our relationship with any commercial partner or independent sales agent ends, we will likely also lose

our relationship with their customers.

Furthermore, our success is partially dependent on the willingness and ability of the sales

representatives and other employees of our commercial partners and independent sales agents to diligently sell our products.

we cannot guarantee that they will be successful in marketing our products.

In addition, because our commercial partners and independent

sales agents do not sell our products exclusively, they may focus their sales efforts and resources on other products that produce

better margins or greater commissions for them or are incorporated into a broader strategic relationship with a partner.

we do not control the sales representatives and other employees of our commercial partners, we cannot guarantee that our sales

processes, regulatory compliance and other priorities will be consistently communicated and executed.

In addition, we do not have

staff in many of the areas covered by our commercial partners and independent sales agents, which makes it particularly difficult

for us to monitor their performance.

While we may take steps to mitigate the risks associated with noncompliance by our commercial

partners and independent sales agents, there remains a risk that they will not comply with regulatory requirements or our requirements

and policies.

Actions by the sales representatives and other employees of our commercial partners and independent sales agents

that are beyond our control could result in flat or declining sales in that territory, harm to the reputation of our company or

our products or legal liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results

of operations.

In addition to the risk of losing customers, the operation of local laws and our agreements with our commercial

partners and independent sales agents would make it difficult for us to replace a commercial partner or independent sales agent

we feel is underperforming.

In order to increase

our sales, particularly with respect to our Core Products, we intend to develop relationships and arrangements with additional

commercial partners and/or independent sales agents, which we may not be able to do on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

If we are unable to establish new commercial partner and independent sales agent relationships and maintain our relationships with

our existing commercial partners and independent sales agents, in each case, on commercially reasonable terms, we will be unable

to increase sales of our products and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely

addition, certain of our commercial partners may, from time to time, account for a significant portion of our net sales

and/or accounts receivable.

Sales to Surgalign Holdings, one of our commercial partners, accounted for 10% of our net sales

during the year ended December 31, 2020 and represented 13% of our accounts receivable as of December 31, 2020.

Medtronic, also one of our commercial partners, accounted for 17% of our net sales during the year ended December 31, 2020

and represented 34% of our accounts receivable as of December 31, 2020.

The loss of one or more significant commercial

partners, a material reduction in their purchases of our products, or their inability to perform their contractual

obligations, including, for example, committed purchase requirements, could adversely affect our business, financial

condition and results of operations.

We are also subject to the risk that any such commercial partner will experience

financial difficulties that prevent them from making payments to us on a timely basis or at all.

and profitability could be materially and adversely affected if we fail to maintain our relationships with our existing contract

manufacturing customers and enter into agreements with new contract manufacturing customers, or if existing contract manufacturing

customers reduce purchases of our products.

If we are not successful in expanding our indications and developing, acquiring and commercializing new products and product enhancements, our ability to increase our net sales may be impaired, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, our research and development efforts may require a substantial investment of time and resources before we are adequately able to determine the commercial viability of a new product, technology or other innovation.

Even if we are able to successfully develop and commercialize new product offerings or enhancements, they may be quickly rendered obsolete by changing customer preferences or the introduction by our competitors of products embodying new technologies or features and/or otherwise not produce sales in excess of the costs of development, any of which could also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Furthermore, to the extent we seek to enhance our products and broaden our product portfolio through acquisitions or other commercial transactions, we will be subject to additional risks.

See “— We regularly evaluate opportunities to make acquisitions of, investments in, and licenses or other commercial arrangements involving, other companies or technologies, and to enter into other strategic transactions.

These transactions entail significant risks .”

Our success depends on our ability to maintain the value and reputation of the Aziyo name.

We believe that the “Aziyo” name is important to attracting and retaining customers, and enhancing our name depends largely on our ability to provide high-quality and safe products.

Our name could be harmed if we fail to achieve these objectives or if our public image were to be tarnished by events yielding negative perceptions and publicity.

For example, in June 2021, we issued a voluntary recall pertaining to a single donor lot of our FiberCel Fiber Viable Bone Matrix (“FiberCel”), a bone repair product made from human tissue that is used in various orthopedic and spinal procedures.

Notice of the voluntary recall was issued to hospitals that received products from this specific lot, following our learning of post-surgical infections in patients treated with FiberCel, including some patients who tested positive for tuberculosis, including eight cases that resulted in fatalities (the “FiberCel Recall”).

Following the public announcement of our voluntary recall, there has been various media coverage surrounding the recall and patients impacted, as well as lawsuits filed against us, which are described in Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” and Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Such negative publicity related to the perceived quality and safety of our products could affect our brand image, decrease confidence in our products or have an adverse effect on our ability to retain existing and attract new customers, suppliers and distribution partners, any one of which could result in decreased revenue, having an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

A substantial portion of our net sales is generated through our commercial partners and independent sales agents, which subjects us to various risks.

We currently rely on the efforts of our commercial partners and independent sales agents to generate a substantial portion of our net sales, and we expect to continue to rely on these third parties to generate a substantial portion of our net

sales in the future while we work to grow our direct sales force.

As a result, the impairment or termination of these relationships for any reason, or the failure of these parties to diligently sell our products and comply with applicable laws and regulations, has and could in the future materially and adversely affect our ability to generate revenue and profits.

Because our commercial partners and independent sales agents control the relationships with our end customers, if our relationship with any commercial partner or independent sales agent ends, we will likely also lose our relationship with their customers.

Furthermore, our success is partially dependent on the willingness and ability of the sales representatives and other employees of our commercial partners and independent sales agents to diligently sell our products.

However, we cannot guarantee that they will be successful in marketing our products.

In addition, because our commercial partners and independent sales agents do not sell our products exclusively, they may focus their sales efforts and resources on other products that produce better margins or greater commissions for them or are incorporated into a broader strategic relationship with a partner.

Because we do not control the sales representatives and other employees of our commercial partners, we cannot guarantee that our sales processes, regulatory compliance and other priorities will be consistently communicated and executed.

In addition, we do not have staff in many of the areas covered by our commercial partners and independent sales agents, which makes it particularly difficult for us to monitor their performance.

While we may take steps to mitigate the risks associated with noncompliance by our commercial partners and independent sales agents, there remains a risk that they will not comply with regulatory requirements or our requirements and policies.

Actions by the sales representatives and other employees of our commercial partners and independent sales agents that are beyond our control could result in flat or declining sales in that territory, harm to the reputation of the Company or our products or legal liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition to the risk of losing customers, the operation of local laws and our agreements with our commercial partners and independent sales agents would make it difficult for us to replace a commercial partner or independent sales agent we feel is underperforming.

In order to increase our sales, particularly with respect to our Core Products, we intend to develop relationships and arrangements with additional commercial partners and/or independent sales agents, which we may not be able to do on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

If we are unable to establish new commercial partner and independent sales agent relationships and maintain our relationships with our existing commercial partners and independent sales agents, in each case, on commercially reasonable terms, we will be unable to increase sales of our products and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

In addition, certain of our commercial partners may, from time to time, account for a significant portion of our net sales and/or accounts receivable.

Sales to Surgalign Spine Technologies, one of our commercial partners, accounted for 10% of our net sales during the year ended December 31, 2021 and represented 12% of our accounts receivable as of December 31, 2021.

Sales to Medtronic accounted for 11% of our net sales during the twelve months ended December 31, 2021 and represented none of our accounts receivable as of December 31, 2021.

As more fully described elsewhere in this Annual Report, we issued a voluntary recall in June 2021 pertaining to a single donor lot of our FiberCel product after learning of post-surgical infections in several patients treated with the product, including some of whom tested positive for tuberculosis, and eight of whom suffered a fatal outcome.

FiberCel was distributed by Medtronic and, in June 2021, Medtronic notified us that sales of FiberCel as well as all such other Non-Core products supplied to Medtronic would be suspended until further notice.

In October 2021, we were informed by Medtronic that they would no longer be distributing cellular bone products such as FiberCel and, in December 2021, the two companies mutually terminated the associated FiberCel distribution agreement.

The loss of one or more significant commercial partners, a material reduction in their purchases of our products, such as what we have experienced with Medtronic, or their inability to perform their contractual obligations, including, for example, committed purchase requirements, has affected and could continue to adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are also subject to the risk that any such commercial partner will experience financial difficulties that prevent them from making payments to us on a timely basis or at all.

Our revenue and profitability could be materially and adversely affected if we fail to maintain our relationships with our existing contract manufacturing customers and enter into agreements with new contract manufacturing customers, or if existing contract manufacturing customers reduce purchases of our products.

Our relationships with these customers also subject us to certain risks.

Our contract manufacturing

operations are an important component of our business, enabling us to utilize as much as possible of the human biological material

from which we produce our core orthopedic/spinal repair and soft tissue reconstruction products, leverage our existing overhead

and improve our cash flow.

In addition, we have historically generated a significant portion of our total net sales from sales

of our Non-Core Products, which is composed primarily of purchases from our contract manufacturing customers.

Sales of our Non-Core

Products represented approximately 15.1% and 27.9% of our total net sales for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively,

and this decrease largely resulted from a reduction in volume of products purchased by one significant contract customer following

the expiration of its contract.

As a result, if we are unable to maintain our relationships with our existing contract manufacturing

customers and establish relationships with new contract manufacturing customers on terms that are favorable to us, or if our existing

contract manufacturing customers materially reduce their purchases of our products, our sales and profitability may be further

adversely affected.

In addition, although

we have invested, and expect to continue to invest, significant time and resources cultivating our relationships with these customers,

these relationships subject us to certain risks.

For example, our contract manufacturing customers may use their experience with

our products to develop their own solutions, which they may be able to produce at a lower cost than the price they pay for our

This is particularly true given that many of our customers are large, established companies that may be able to achieve

greater economies of scale in manufacturing and production and/or experience synergies from vertical integration.

our contract manufacturing customers routinely audit and inspect our facilities, processes and practices to ensure that our manufacturing

process and products meet their internal standards and applicable regulatory standards.

To date, we have passed all such audits

and inspections.

However, we may not do so in the future, and any failure to perform to our customers’

satisfaction in these

audits could significantly harm our relationships with them and our reputation, which could materially and adversely affect our

business, financial condition and results of operations.

Furthermore, the need to comply with our customers’

internal requirements

could result in increased development, manufacturing, warranty and administrative costs.

A significant increase in these costs

could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

There is also a risk that we may be unable

to supply products in the quantities and of the quality required by these customers within their required timeframes, which would

also jeopardize our relationships with them.

Our contract manufacturing operations are an important component of our business, enabling us to utilize as much as possible of the human biological material from which we produce our core orthopedic/spinal repair and soft tissue reconstruction products, leverage our existing overhead and improve our cash flow.

In addition, we have historically generated a significant portion of our total net sales from sales of our Non-Core Products, which is composed primarily of purchases from our contract manufacturing customers.

Sales of our Non-Core Products represented approximately 20.7% and 15.1% of our total net sales for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

If we are unable to maintain our relationships and contracts with our existing contract manufacturing customers and establish relationships with new contract manufacturing customers on terms that are favorable to us, or if our existing contract manufacturing customers materially reduce their purchases of our products, our sales and profitability may be adversely affected.

In addition, although we have invested, and expect to continue to invest, significant time and resources cultivating our relationships with these customers, these relationships subject us to certain risks.

For example, our contract manufacturing customers may use their experience with our products to develop their own solutions, which they may be able to produce at a lower cost than the price they pay for our products.

This is particularly true given that many of our customers are large, established companies that may be able to achieve greater economies of scale in manufacturing and production and/or experience synergies from vertical integration.

In addition, our contract manufacturing customers routinely audit and inspect our facilities, processes and practices to ensure that our manufacturing process and products meet their internal standards and applicable regulatory standards.

To date, we have passed all such audits and inspections.

However, we may not do so in the future, and any failure to perform to our customers’ satisfaction in these audits could significantly harm our relationships with them and our reputation, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Furthermore, the need to comply with our customers’ internal requirements could result in increased development, manufacturing, warranty and administrative costs.

A significant increase in these costs could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

There is also a risk that we may be unable to supply products in the quantities and of the quality required by these customers within their required timeframes, which would also jeopardize our relationships with them.

Disagreements or disputes may also arise from time to time.

Any of these events, to

the extent they cause our customers to reduce purchases of our products or terminate their relationships with us, could have a

material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, our sales

to these customers may be impacted by changes in their buying habits over which we have no control.

Such changes may be driven

by, among other things, changes in market share, cyclicality, inventory reductions, spending patterns, cost-cutting measures, product

development activity and timelines and changes in supply chain management, as well as the impact of general economic conditions.

These customers may also experience financial difficulties or other problems that may prevent them from making payments to us on

a timely basis or at all.

Any of these events could cause our operating results to fluctuate from period to period, make it more

difficult for us to manage our inventory and production schedules and otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition

and results of operations.

to expand our direct sales force, and if we are unable to successfully expand, manage and maintain our direct sales force, we may

not be able to generate greater market share and revenue growth.

Prior to the CorMatrix

Acquisition, we had a very small direct sales force and sold our Core Products primarily through independent sales agents or to

other companies for resale or incorporation into their products.

Though our orthopedic/spinal repair products are now primarily

sold through our commercial partners, we currently utilize our direct sales force to sell CanGaroo and our cardiovascular products,

as well as our SimpliDerm product.

As of December 31, 2020, our direct sales organization consisted of 33 sales representatives,

who are focused on increasing market access and market penetration by selling our products, managing our commercial partners, and

providing technical assistance.

Our operating results are directly dependent upon the efforts of these employees.

If our direct

sales force fails to adequately promote, market and sell our products and effectively manage and assist our commercial partners,

our net sales may be adversely affected.

In addition, in order

to expand our network of hospital and physician customers, drive deeper penetration in our current accounts and provide additional

technical assistance to our commercial partners, we plan to expand the size and geographic scope of our direct sales force.

growth may require us to split or adjust existing sales territories, which may adversely affect our ability to retain customers

in those territories.

Additionally, our future success will depend largely on our ability to continue to hire, train, retain and

motivate skilled sales personnel with significant industry experience and technical knowledge of regenerative medicine and related

Because the competition for their services is high, we cannot assure you we will be able to hire and retain additional

personnel on favorable or commercially reasonable terms, if at all.

Failure to hire or retain qualified sales personnel would prevent

us from expanding our business and generating additional revenue.

In addition, it typically takes a substantial period of time

before newly hired sales personnel are effective.

Though we currently utilize commercial partners and independent sales agents

to sell certain of our products, there is no guarantee that we will be able to establish relationships with additional parties,

or that our existing commercial partners and independent sales agents will purchase or otherwise commercialize any products we

may seek to introduce in the future.

If we are unable to expand our sales and marketing capabilities, we may not be able to effectively

commercialize our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are working

to grow our direct sales force for certain of our products, which may result in higher fixed costs and may slow our ability to

reduce costs in the face of a sudden decline in demand for our products.

A key component of

our growth involves expanding the size and geographic scope of our direct sales force.

A direct sales force may subject us to higher

fixed costs than those of other companies that market competing products primarily through third parties due to the costs that

we will bear associated with employee benefits, training and managing sales personnel.

As a result, we could be at a competitive

disadvantage relative to competitors who rely more heavily on third parties to market and sell their products.

Additionally, these

fixed costs may slow our ability to reduce costs in the face of a sudden decline in demand for our products, which could have a

material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

incurred operating losses since our inception, expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses in the future,

and may not be able to achieve or sustain profitability.

We have incurred net

losses since our inception in 2015.

For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2020, we had net losses of $11.9 million and

$21.8, respectively.

As of December 31, 2020, we had an accumulated deficit of $80.3 million.

To date, we have financed

our operations primarily through private placements of our convertible preferred stock, amounts borrowed under our credit facilities

and sales of our products.

We have devoted the majority of our resources to acquisition and integration, manufacturing costs, research

and development, clinical activity and investing in our commercial infrastructure through our direct sales force and commercial

partners in order to expand our presence and to promote awareness and adoption of our products.

We expect that our

operating expenses will continue to increase as we grow our sales organization, expand our product development and clinical and

research activities, and incur additional costs associated with being a public company.

As a result, we expect to continue to incur

operating losses in the future and may never achieve profitability.

Furthermore, even if we do achieve profitability, we may not

be able to sustain or increase profitability on an ongoing basis.

If we do not achieve or sustain profitability, it will be more

difficult for us to finance our business and accomplish our strategic objectives, either of which would have a material adverse

effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and cause the market price of our Class A common stock to

In addition, failure of our products to significantly penetrate existing or new markets would negatively affect our business,

financial condition and results of operations.

has been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by the outbreak of the novel strain of coronavirus disease, COVID-19, and

may be adversely affected by any future pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease in the United States or worldwide.

If a pandemic, epidemic

or outbreak of an infectious disease occurs in the United States or worldwide, our business may be adversely affected.

2019, a novel strain of coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, was identified in Wuhan, China.

Since then, SARS-CoV-2, and the resulting disease,

COVID-19, has spread to most countries and all 50 states within the United States.

The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted

our business, financial condition and results of operations by significantly decreasing and delaying the number of procedures performed

using our products, and we expect the pandemic to continue to negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of

Similar to the general trend in elective and other surgical procedures, the number of procedures performed using our

products has decreased significantly as healthcare organizations in the United States have prioritized the treatment of patients

with COVID-19 or have otherwise altered their operations to prepare for and respond to the pandemic.

For example, in the United

States, governmental authorities have recommended, and in certain cases required, that elective, specialty and other non-emergency

procedures and appointments be suspended or canceled in order to avoid patient exposure to medical environments and the risk of

potential infection with the novel coronavirus, and to focus limited resources and personnel capacity on the treatment of COVID-19

Beginning in March 2020, a significant number of procedures using our products have been postponed or cancelled, which

has negatively impacted sales of our products.

Decreases in procedures have been most prevalent in regions experiencing significant

outbreaks, while healthcare organizations in other regions have continued to undertake procedures using our products at reduced

levels as compared to before the pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic could also adversely impact the initiation, continuation and completion

of our clinical trials by, for example, delaying procedures using our products or reducing the number of patients, healthcare providers

or clinical facilities available or willing to participate in the clinical trials.

These delays could result in increased costs,

delays in advancing our product development, delays in testing the effectiveness of our technology or termination of the clinical

studies altogether.

These measures and challenges will likely continue for the duration of the pandemic, which is uncertain, and

may continue to reduce our net sales and negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations while the

pandemic continues.

Further, even after the pandemic ultimately subsides, we anticipate there will be a substantial backlog of

patients seeking procedures and appointments for a variety of medical conditions and, as a result, patients seeking procedures

performed using our products will have to navigate limited provider capacity.

We believe this limited capacity of providers, hospitals

and other healthcare facilities could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations

during and following the COVID-19 pandemic.

Numerous state

and local jurisdictions, including those where our facilities are located, have imposed, and others in the future may impose,

“shelter-in-place”

orders, quarantines, executive orders and similar government orders and restrictions for their

residents to control the spread of COVID-19.

Such orders or restrictions have resulted in reduced operations at our manufacturing

facilities, travel restrictions and cancellation of events and have restricted the ability of our sales representatives and those

of our commercial partners and independent sales agents to attend procedures in which our products are used, among other effects,

thereby significantly and negatively impacting our operations.

Other disruptions or potential disruptions include restrictions

on the ability of our sales representatives and other personnel, and those of our commercial partners and independent sales agents,

to travel and access customers for training and case support;

inability of our suppliers to manufacture and deliver to us on a

timely basis or at all;

delays in our ability to obtain medical records for tissue donors, which we need in order to release our

Any of these events, to the extent they cause our customers to reduce purchases of our products or terminate their relationships with us, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, our sales to these customers may be impacted by changes in their buying habits over which we have no control.

Such changes may be driven by, among other things, changes in market share, cyclicality, inventory reductions, spending patterns, cost-cutting measures, product development activity and timelines and changes in supply chain management, as well as the impact of general economic conditions.

These customers may also experience financial difficulties or other problems that may prevent them from making payments to us on a timely basis or at all.

Any of these events could cause our operating results to fluctuate from period to period, make it more difficult for us to manage our inventory and production schedules and otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We plan to expand our direct sales force coinciding with new product launches, and if we are unable to successfully expand, manage and maintain our direct sales force, we may not be able to generate greater market share and revenue growth.

Prior to the CorMatrix Acquisition, we had a very small direct sales force and sold our Core Products primarily through independent sales agents or to other companies for resale or incorporation into their products.

Though our orthopedic/spinal repair products are now primarily sold through our commercial partners, we currently utilize our direct sales force to sell CanGaroo and our cardiovascular products.

As of December 31, 2021, our direct sales organization consisted of 31 sales representatives, who are focused on increasing market access and market penetration by selling our products, managing our commercial partners, and providing technical assistance.

Our operating results are directly

dependent upon the efforts of these employees.

If our direct sales force fails to adequately promote, market and sell our products and effectively manage and assist our commercial partners, our net sales may be adversely affected.

In addition, in order to launch new products, expand our network of hospital and physician customers, drive deeper penetration in our current accounts and provide additional technical assistance to our commercial partners, we plan to expand the size and geographic scope of our direct sales force.

This growth may require us to split or adjust existing sales territories, which may adversely affect our ability to retain customers in those territories.

Additionally, our future success will depend largely on our ability to continue to hire, train, retain and motivate skilled sales and marketing personnel with significant industry experience and technical knowledge of regenerative medicine and related products.

Because the competition for their services is high, we cannot assure you we will be able to hire and retain additional personnel on favorable or commercially reasonable terms, if at all.

Failure to hire or retain qualified sales personnel would prevent us from expanding our business and generating additional revenue.

In addition, it typically takes a substantial period of time before newly hired sales personnel are effective.

Though we currently utilize commercial partners and independent sales agents to sell certain of our products, there is no guarantee that we will be able to establish relationships with additional parties, or that our existing commercial partners and independent sales agents will purchase or otherwise commercialize any products we may seek to introduce in the future.

If we are unable to expand our sales and marketing capabilities, we may not be able to effectively commercialize our new and current products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are working to grow our direct sales force, which may result in higher fixed costs and may slow our ability to reduce costs in the face of a sudden decline in demand for our products.

A key component of our growth involves continuing to expand the size and geographic scope of our direct sales force.

Our direct sales force may subject us to higher fixed costs than those of other companies that market competing products primarily through third parties due to the costs that we will bear associated with employee benefits, training and managing sales personnel.

As a result, we could be at a competitive disadvantage relative to competitors who rely more heavily on third parties to market and sell their products.

Additionally, these fixed costs may slow our ability to reduce costs in the face of a sudden decline in demand for our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have incurred operating losses since our inception, expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses in the future, and may not be able to achieve or sustain profitability.

We have incurred net losses since our inception in 2015.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, we had net losses of $24.8 million and as of December 31, 2021, we had an accumulated deficit of $105.1 million.

To date, we have financed our operations primarily through private placements of our convertible preferred stock, amounts borrowed under our credit facilities and sales of our products and, more recently, with proceeds from our IPO and private placement of our Class A common stock.

We have devoted the majority of our resources to acquisition and integration, manufacturing costs, research and development, clinical activity and investing in our commercial infrastructure through our direct sales force and commercial partners in order to expand our presence and to promote awareness and adoption of our products.

We expect that our operating expenses will continue to increase as we grow our sales organization, expand our product development and clinical and research activities, and incur additional costs associated with being a public company.

Our ability to achieve profitability will depend on our ability to generate sales from existing or new products sufficient to exceed our ongoing operating expenses and capital requirements.

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties affecting product sales and our ongoing commercialization and product development efforts, we are unable to predict with any certainty whether we will be able to increase sales of our products or the timing or amount of ongoing expenditures we will be required to incur.

Sales of our products, as well as meaningful reductions, suspensions or discontinuations of such sales (such as that involving FiberCel), may not offset our operating expenses.

As a result, we expect to continue to incur operating losses in the future and may never achieve profitability.

Furthermore, even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on an ongoing basis.

As a result, we anticipate that we will need additional funding to support our continuing operations and pursue our growth strategy.

Until such time as we are able to generate sufficient sales from our products, we expect to finance our operations through equity offerings, debt financings or other capital sources, which may include collaborations or license agreements with other companies or

other strategic transactions such as an asset sale.

We may not be able to raise additional funds or enter into such other agreements or arrangements when needed on favorable terms or at all.

If we fail to raise capital or enter into such agreements in the short-term, we will be unable to fund our operations and capital expenditure requirements at that time which may result in there being substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

If we do not achieve or sustain profitability, it will be more difficult for us to finance our business and accomplish our strategic objectives, either of which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and cause the market price of our Class A common stock to decline.

In addition, failure of our products to significantly penetrate existing or new markets would negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business has been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by the outbreak of the novel strain of coronavirus disease, COVID-19, and may be adversely affected by any future pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease in the United States or worldwide.

If a pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease occurs in the United States or worldwide, our business may be adversely affected.

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, was identified in Wuhan, China.

Since then, SARS-CoV-2, and the resulting disease, COVID-19, has spread to most countries and all 50 states within the United States.

The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted our business, financial condition and results of operations by significantly decreasing and delaying the number of procedures performed using our products, and we expect the pandemic to continue to negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Similar to the general trend in elective and other surgical procedures, the number of procedures performed using our products has decreased significantly as healthcare organizations in the United States have prioritized the treatment of patients with COVID-19 or have otherwise altered their operations to prepare for and respond to the pandemic.

For example, in the United States, governmental authorities have recommended, and in certain cases required, that elective, specialty and other non-emergency procedures and appointments be suspended or canceled in order to avoid patient exposure to medical environments and the risk of potential infection with the novel coronavirus, and to focus limited resources and personnel capacity on the treatment of COVID-19 patients.

Beginning in March 2020, a significant number of procedures using our products have been postponed or cancelled, which has negatively impacted sales of our products.

Decreases in procedures have been most prevalent in regions experiencing significant outbreaks, while healthcare organizations in other regions have continued to undertake procedures using our products at reduced levels as compared to before the pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic could also adversely impact the initiation, continuation and completion of our clinical studies by, for example, delaying procedures using our products or reducing the number of patients, healthcare providers or clinical facilities available or willing to participate in the clinical studies.

These delays could result in increased costs, delays in advancing our product development, delays in testing the effectiveness of our technology or termination of the clinical studies altogether.

These measures and challenges will likely continue for the duration of the pandemic, which is uncertain, and may continue to reduce our net sales and negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations while the pandemic continues.

Further, even after the pandemic ultimately subsides, we anticipate there will be a substantial backlog of patients seeking procedures and appointments for a variety of medical conditions and, as a result, patients seeking procedures performed using our products will have to navigate limited provider capacity.

We believe this limited capacity of providers, hospitals and other healthcare facilities could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations during and following the COVID-19 pandemic.

Numerous state and local jurisdictions, including those where our facilities are located, have imposed, and others in the future may impose, “shelter-in-place” orders, quarantines, executive orders and similar government orders and restrictions for their residents to control the spread of COVID-19.

Such orders or restrictions have resulted in reduced operations at our manufacturing facilities, travel restrictions and cancellation of events and have restricted the ability of our sales representatives and those of our commercial partners and independent sales agents to attend procedures in which our products are used, among other effects, thereby significantly and negatively impacting our operations.

Other disruptions or potential disruptions include restrictions on the ability of our sales representatives and other personnel, and those of our commercial partners and independent sales agents, to travel and access customers for training and case support;

inability of our suppliers to manufacture and deliver to us on a timely basis or at all;

delays in our ability to obtain medical records for tissue donors, which we need in order to release our products;

disruptions in our production schedule and ability to manufacture and assemble products;

1 unchanged sentence

delays in actions of regulatory bodies;

delays in clinical trials and studies;

diversion of or limitations on employee resources

that would otherwise be focused on the operations of our business, including because of sickness of employees or their families

or the desire of employees to avoid contact with groups of people;

delays in growing or reductions in our direct sales force,

including through delays in hiring, lay-offs, furloughs or other losses of sales representatives;

restrictions in our ability

to ship our products to customers;

business adjustments or disruptions of certain third parties, including suppliers, medical

institutions and clinical investigators with whom we conduct business;

negative impact on our customers’

credit profiles,

which may adversely impact our future collection experience;

and additional government requirements or other incremental mitigation

efforts that may further impact our or our suppliers’

capacity to manufacture our products.

The extent, to which the COVID-19

pandemic or any future pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease impacts our business, will depend on future events

and developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the severity and spread of the disease and the

effectiveness of actions to contain the disease or treat its impact, among others.

As new information regarding COVID-19 continues

to emerge, it is difficult to predict what impact this disease will ultimately have on our business.

changes in general domestic and global economic conditions and instability and disruption of credit markets, including as a result

of the current COVID-19 pandemic or any other outbreak of an infectious disease, could adversely affect our business, financial

condition, results of operations and liquidity.

We are subject to

risks arising from adverse changes in general domestic and global economic conditions, including any recession, economic slowdown

or disruption of credit markets.

While the potential economic impact brought by, and the duration of, any pandemic, epidemic or

outbreak of an infectious disease, including COVID-19, may be difficult to assess or predict, the current COVID-19 pandemic has

resulted in, and may continue to result in, significant disruption of global financial markets.

These events, and any financial

crisis that may occur in the future, could make it more difficult and more expensive for hospitals and health systems to obtain

credit, which may contribute to pressures on their operating margins.

As a result, hospitals and health systems may curtail and

reduce capital and overall spending, which may have a significant adverse effect on our business.

In addition, the current economic

downturn that has resulted from the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted and may continue to result in, and any economic downturn that

may occur in the future may also result in, higher unemployment and a reduction in the number of individuals covered by private

insurance, which may result in an increase in the cost of uncompensated care for hospitals.

Higher unemployment may also result

in a shift in reimbursement patterns as unemployed individuals switch from private plans to public plans such as U.S.

As economic conditions deteriorate and unemployment increases, any significant shift in coverage for the unemployed

may have an unfavorable impact on our business.

In addition, the current

COVID-19 pandemic and any other disruption in the capital and credit markets could impede our access to capital, which could be

further adversely affected if we are unable to maintain our current credit ratings.

Should we have limited access to additional

financing sources, we may need to defer capital expenditures or seek other sources of liquidity, which may not be available to

us on acceptable terms or at all.

Similarly, if our suppliers face challenges in obtaining credit or other financial difficulties,

they may be unable to provide the materials required to manufacture our products.

All of these factors related to global economic

conditions, which are beyond our control, could adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

growth depends on physician awareness of the distinctive characteristics, benefits, safety, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness

of our products.

We focus our sales,

marketing and training efforts on physicians, surgeons and other healthcare professionals.

The acceptance of our products depends

in part on our ability to educate these individuals as to the distinctive characteristics, benefits, safety, clinical efficacy

and cost-effectiveness of our products compared to alternative products, procedures and therapies.

We support our direct sales

force, commercial partners and independent sales agents through in-person educational programs and online medical educational materials,

among other things.

We also produce marketing materials, including materials outlining our products, for our sales teams using

printed, video and multimedia formats.

However, our efforts to educate physicians, surgeons and other healthcare professionals

regarding our products may not be successful, particularly in markets in which we rely exclusively on the efforts of our commercial

partners and independent sales agents.

A failure to educate physicians and surgeons may impair our ability to achieve market acceptance

of our products and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

depends on the continued and future acceptance of our products by the medical community.

Even if we are able

to increase awareness of our products among healthcare professionals, there can be no assurance that this will translate into greater

acceptance of our products by the medical community.

We believe physicians, surgeons and other healthcare professionals will only

adopt our products if they determine, based on experience, clinical data and published peer reviewed journal articles, that the

use of our products in a particular procedure is a favorable alternative to other available methods.

Physicians also are more interested

in using cost-effective products as they face increasing cost-containment pressure.

In general, physicians may be slow to change

their medical treatment practices and adopt our products for a variety of reasons, including, among others:

their lack of experience using our products;

lack of evidence supporting additional patient benefits from use of our products over conventional

in clinical studies;

diversion of or limitations on employee resources that would otherwise be focused on the operations of our business, including because of sickness of employees or their families or the desire of employees to avoid contact with groups of people;

delays in growing or reductions in our direct sales force, including through delays in hiring, lay-offs, furloughs or other losses of sales representatives;

restrictions in our ability to ship our products to customers;

business adjustments or disruptions of certain third parties, including suppliers, medical institutions and clinical investigators with whom we conduct business;

negative impact on our customers’ credit profiles, which may adversely impact our future collection experience;

and additional government requirements or other incremental mitigation efforts that may further impact our or our suppliers’ capacity to manufacture our products.

The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic or any future pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease impacts our business, will depend on future events and developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the severity and spread of the disease and the effectiveness of actions to contain the disease or treat its impact and the emergence of new variants, among others developments.

As new information regarding COVID-19 continues to emerge, it is difficult to predict what impact this disease will ultimately have on our business.

Adverse changes in general domestic and global economic conditions and instability and disruption of credit markets, including as a result of the current COVID-19 pandemic or any other outbreak of an infectious disease, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

We are subject to risks arising from adverse changes in general domestic and global economic conditions, including any recession, economic slowdown or disruption of credit markets.

While the potential economic impact brought by, and the duration of, any pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease, including COVID-19, may be difficult to assess or predict, the current COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in, and may continue to result in, significant disruption of global financial markets.

These events, and any financial crisis that may occur in the future, could make it more difficult and more expensive for hospitals and health systems to obtain credit, which may contribute to pressures on their operating margins.

As a result, hospitals and health systems may curtail and reduce capital and overall spending, which may have a significant adverse effect on our business.

In addition, the current economic downturn related to the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted and may continue to result in, and any economic downturn that may occur in the future may also result in, higher unemployment and a reduction in the number of individuals covered by private insurance, which may result in an increase in the cost of uncompensated care for hospitals.

Higher unemployment may also result in a shift in reimbursement patterns as unemployed individuals switch from private plans to public plans such as U.S.

Medicaid or Medicare.

As economic conditions deteriorate, any significant shift in coverage for the unemployed may have an unfavorable impact on our business.

In addition, the current COVID-19 pandemic and any other disruption in the capital and credit markets could impede our access to capital, which could be further adversely affected if we are unable to maintain our current credit ratings.

Should we have limited access to additional financing sources, we may need to defer capital expenditures or seek other sources of liquidity, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all.

Similarly, if our suppliers face challenges in obtaining credit or other financial difficulties, they may be unable to provide the materials required to manufacture our products.

All of these factors related to global economic conditions, which are beyond our control, could adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

Our future growth depends on physician awareness of the distinctive characteristics, benefits, safety, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of our products.

We focus our sales, marketing and training efforts on physicians, surgeons and other healthcare professionals.

The acceptance of our products depends in part on our ability to educate these individuals as to the distinctive characteristics, benefits, safety, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of our products compared to alternative products, procedures and therapies.

We support our direct sales force, commercial partners and independent sales agents through in-person and online educational programs, among other things.

We also produce and distribute marketing and educational materials, including materials outlining our products, for our sales teams using printed, video and multimedia formats.

However, our efforts to educate physicians, surgeons and other healthcare professionals regarding our products may not be successful, particularly with respect to our Bone Repair products in light of the recent events involving the FiberCel Recall, and in markets where we rely exclusively on the efforts of our commercial partners and independent sales agents.

If we do not adequately educate physicians, surgeons and other healthcare professionals about our products, as well as any

adverse events involving these products, our products may not gain or maintain market acceptance, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our success depends on the continued and future acceptance of our products by the medical community.

Even if we are able to increase awareness of our products among healthcare professionals, there can be no assurance that this will translate into greater acceptance of our products by the medical community.

We believe physicians, surgeons and other healthcare professionals will only adopt our products if they determine, based on experience, clinical data and published peer reviewed journal articles, that the use of our products in a particular procedure is a favorable alternative to other available methods.

In light of the events surrounding the FiberCel Recall, described in Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” and Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report, such positive evaluation of our Bone Repair products may become more challenging.

Physicians also are more interested in using cost-effective products as they face increasing cost-containment pressure.

In general, physicians may be slow to change their medical treatment practices and adopt our products for a variety of reasons, including, among others:

● their lack of experience using our products and the time that must be dedicated to learning how to use our products;

● lack of evidence supporting additional patient benefits from use of our products over conventional methods;

● pressure to contain costs;

preference for other treatment modalities or our competitors’

● preference for other treatment modalities or our competitors’ products;

● perceived liability risks generally associated with the use of new products and procedures;

● limited availability of coverage and/or reimbursement from third-party payors.

the time that must be dedicated to learning how to use our products.

The degree of market

acceptance of our products will continue to depend on a number of factors, some of which are outside of our control, including,

among other things:

The degree of market acceptance of our products will continue to depend on a number of factors, some of which are outside of our control, including, among other things:

● the actual and perceived safety and efficacy of our products;

● the potential and perceived advantages of our products over alternative treatments;

clinical data and the clinical indications for which our products are approved;

product labeling or product insert requirements of the FDA, the European Union or other regulatory

authorities, including any limitations or warnings contained in approved labeling;

the cost of using our products relative to the use of our competitors’

products or alternative

treatment modalities;

● clinical data and the clinical indications for which our products are approved or certified;

● product labeling or product insert requirements of the FDA, the EU or other regulatory authorities, including any limitations or warnings contained in approved labeling;

● the cost of using our products relative to the use of our competitors’ products or alternative treatment modalities;

● relative convenience and ease of administration;

5 unchanged sentences

● the shelf life of our products and our ability to manage the logistics of the end-user supply chain;

sufficient and readily accessible third-party insurance coverage and reimbursement for procedures

incorporating our products.

In addition, we believe

recommendations for, and support of our products by, influential physicians are essential for market acceptance and adoption.

we do not receive this support (e.g., because we are unable to demonstrate favorable long-term clinical data or otherwise), physicians

and hospitals may not use our products, which would significantly impair our ability to increase our sales and prevent us from

achieving and sustaining profitability.

results from any of our pre-clinical studies or clinical trials, comparative effectiveness, economic or other studies, or from

similar trials or studies conducted by others, may negatively affect the use or adoption of our products by physicians, hospitals

and payors, which could have a negative impact on the market acceptance of our products and their profitability.

We regularly conduct

a variety of pre-clinical studies and clinical trials, comparative effectiveness studies and economic and other studies of our

products in an effort to generate clinical and real-world outcomes and cost effectiveness data in order to obtain product approval

and drive further penetration in the markets we serve.

If a clinical study conducted by us or a third party fails to demonstrate

statistically significant results supporting performance, use benefits or compelling health or economic outcomes from using our

products, physicians may elect not to use our products.

Furthermore, in the event of an adverse clinical study outcome, our products

may not achieve “standard-of-care”

status, where they exist, for the conditions in question, which could deter the

adoption of our products.

Also, if serious adverse events are reported during the conduct of a study, it could affect continuation

of the study, product approval or clearance and product adoption.

● sufficient and readily accessible third-party insurance coverage and reimbursement for procedures incorporating our products.

In addition, we believe recommendations for, and support of our products by, influential physicians are essential for market acceptance and adoption.

If we do not receive this support (e.g., because we are unable to demonstrate favorable long-term clinical data or otherwise), physicians and hospitals may not use our products, which would significantly impair our ability to increase our sales and prevent us from achieving and sustaining profitability.

Unfavorable results from any of our pre-clinical or clinical studies, comparative effectiveness, economic or other studies, or from similar studies conducted by others, may negatively affect the use or adoption of our products by physicians, hospitals and payors, which could have a negative impact on the market acceptance of our products and their profitability.

We regularly conduct a variety of pre-clinical and clinical studies, comparative effectiveness studies and economic and other studies of our products in an effort to generate clinical and real-world outcomes and cost effectiveness data in order to obtain product approval and drive further penetration in the markets we serve.

If a clinical study conducted by us or a third party fails to demonstrate statistically significant results supporting performance, use benefits or compelling health or economic outcomes from using our products, physicians may elect not to use our products.

Furthermore, in the event of an adverse clinical study outcome, our products may not achieve “standard-of-care” status, where they exist, for the conditions in question, which could deter the adoption of our products.

Also, if serious adverse events are reported during the conduct of a study, it could affect continuation of the study, product approval, certification or clearance and product adoption.

In addition, U.S.

and foreign regulatory authorities routinely

conduct audits of clinical studies and such audits may result in adverse regulatory actions.

If we are unable to develop a body

of statistically significant evidence from our clinical study program, whether due to adverse results or the inability to complete

properly designed studies, domestic and international public and private payors could refuse to cover procedures using our products,

limit the manner in which they cover our products or reduce the price they are willing to pay or reimburse for procedures using

our products.

Any of these events could have a negative impact on market acceptance of procedures using our products and their

profitability, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

need to continue to expand our organization, and managing growth may be more difficult than we expect.

Managing our growth

may be more difficult than we expect.

We anticipate that a period of significant expansion will be required to penetrate and service

the markets for our existing and anticipated future products and to continue to develop new products.

This expansion will place

a significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources.

To manage the expected growth of our operations and

personnel, we must both modify our existing operational and financial systems, procedures and controls and implement new systems,

procedures and controls.

and foreign regulatory authorities routinely conduct audits of clinical studies and such audits may result in adverse regulatory actions.

If we are unable to develop a body of statistically significant evidence from our clinical study program, whether due to adverse results or the inability to complete properly designed studies, domestic and international public and private payors could refuse to cover procedures using our products, limit the manner in which they cover our products or reduce the price they are willing to pay or reimburse for procedures using our products.

Any of these events could have a negative impact on market acceptance of procedures using our products and their profitability, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We will need to continue to expand our organization and managing growth may be more difficult than we expect.

Managing our growth may be more difficult than we expect.

We anticipate that a period of significant expansion will be required to penetrate and service the markets for our existing and anticipated future products and to continue to develop new products.

This expansion will place a significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources.

To manage the expected growth of our operations and personnel, we must both modify our existing operational and financial systems, procedures and controls and implement new systems, procedures and controls.

We must also expand our finance, administrative and operations staff.

Management may be unable to hire,

train, retain, motivate and manage necessary personnel or to identify, manage and exploit existing and potential strategic relationships

and market opportunities.

If we fail to meet these challenges effectively, there may be an adverse effect on our business, financial

condition and results of operations.

evaluate opportunities to make acquisitions of, investments in, and licenses or other commercial arrangements involving, other

companies or technologies, and to enter into other strategic transactions.

Management may be unable to hire, train, retain, motivate and manage necessary personnel or to identify, manage and exploit existing and potential strategic relationships and market opportunities.

If we fail to meet these challenges effectively, there may be an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We regularly evaluate opportunities to make acquisitions of, investments in, and licenses or other commercial arrangements involving, other companies or technologies, and to enter into other strategic transactions.

These transactions entail significant risks.

Our success depends,

in part, on our ability to continually enhance and broaden our product offerings in response to changing customer demands, competitive

pressures and advances in technologies.

Accordingly, although we have no current commitments with respect to any acquisition or

investment, we regularly review potential acquisitions of, investments in, and licenses or other commercial arrangements involving,

complementary businesses, products or technologies instead of developing them ourselves.

In addition, in regularly evaluating our

financial and operating performance, we may decide to sell one or more of our product lines or another portion of our business.

Opportunities to engage in these transactions may not be readily available to us at commercially reasonable prices, on other terms

acceptable to us or at all.

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to continually enhance and broaden our product offerings in response to changing customer demands, competitive pressures and advances in technologies.

Accordingly, although we have no current commitments with respect to any acquisition or investment, we regularly review potential acquisitions of, investments in, and licenses or other commercial arrangements involving, complementary businesses, products or technologies instead of developing them ourselves.

In addition, in regularly evaluating our financial and operating

performance, we may decide to sell one or more of our product lines or another portion of our business.

Opportunities to engage in these transactions may not be readily available to us at commercially reasonable prices, on other terms acceptable to us or at all.

Even if such opportunities are available, these transactions involve significant risks.

In connection

with one or more of these transactions, we may:

In connection with one or more of these transactions, we may:

● issue additional equity securities that would dilute the value of your investment in us;

1 unchanged sentence

● incur debt that could have terms unfavorable to us or that we might be unable to repay;

structure the transaction in a manner that has unfavorable tax consequences, such as a stock purchase

that does not permit a step-up in the tax basis for the assets acquired;

incur asset impairment or other acquisition-related charges, or unforeseen costs, expenditures

be unable to realize the anticipated benefits, such as increased revenues, cost savings or synergies

from additional sales of existing or newly acquired products;

● structure the transaction in a manner that has unfavorable tax consequences, such as a stock purchase that does not permit a step-up in the tax basis for the assets acquired;

● incur asset impairment or other acquisition-related charges, or unforeseen costs, expenditures and risks;

● be unable to realize the anticipated benefits, such as increased revenues, cost savings or synergies from additional sales of existing or newly acquired products;

● experience dissynergies in shared functions following a divestment of any portion of our business;

● be unable to successfully integrate, operate, maintain and manage any newly acquired operations;

divert management’s attention from the existing business to integrate, operate, maintain

and manage any newly acquired operations and personnel, or to manage the complexities involved in separating divested operations,

services, products and personnel;

be unable to secure the services of key employees related to an acquisition or, in the case of

a divestiture, lose one or more of our key employees;

face increased scrutiny and review of our company and operations from government and other regulatory

● divert management’s attention from the existing business to integrate, operate, maintain and manage any newly acquired operations and personnel, or to manage the complexities involved in separating divested operations, services, products and personnel;

● be unable to secure the services of key employees related to an acquisition or, in the case of a divestiture, lose one or more of our key employees;

● face increased scrutiny and review of our company and operations from government and other regulatory authorities;

● otherwise be unable to succeed in the marketplace with the acquisition.

The occurrence of

any of the above could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

business acquisitions also involve the risk of unknown liabilities associated with the acquired business, which could be material.

Such liabilities could include lack of compliance with government regulations that could subject us to investigation, civil and

criminal sanctions, litigation and/or other actions that make it impossible to realize the anticipated benefits of the transaction.

For example, we may acquire a company that was not compliant with FDA quality requirements or was making payments or other forms

of remuneration to physicians to induce them to use their products.

Incurring unknown liabilities or the failure to complete or

realize the anticipated benefits of an acquisition, investment or other commercial arrangement, whether resulting from one or more

of the factors described above or otherwise, could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and

results of operations.

of business and new products and services may subject us to additional risks.

From time to time,

we may implement or acquire new lines of business or introduce new products and services within our existing business lines.

are risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where the markets are not fully developed

or are evolving.

In developing and commercializing new lines of business and new products and services, we may invest significant

time and resources.

External factors, such as regulatory compliance obligations, competitive alternatives, lack of market acceptance

and shifting market preferences, may also affect the successful implementation of a new line of business or a new product or service.

Failure to successfully plan for and manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or new products

or services could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

significant and continuing competition from other companies, some of which have longer operating histories, more established products

and/or greater resources than we do, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We operate in highly

competitive markets that are characterized by intense competition, subject to rapid change and significantly affected by new product

introductions, technological advancements and other market activities of industry participants.

Our competitors have historically

dedicated, and will continue to dedicate, significant resources to promote their products and to develop new products that compete

Customers in our target markets consider many factors when selecting a product, including product efficacy, ease of

use, price, availability of payor coverage and adequate third-party reimbursement for procedures using the product, customer support

services for technical-, clinical- and reimbursement-related matters and customer preference for, and loyalty to, particular products

or a particular manufacturer.

We expect competition to remain intense as competitors introduce additional competing products and

enhancements to their existing products, and continue expanding into geographic markets where we currently operate or plan to expand.

Product introductions or enhancements by competitors, which may have advanced technology, better features or lower pricing, may

make our products obsolete or less competitive.

As a result, we will be required to devote continued efforts and financial resources

to develop and commercialize new products and enhancements to our existing products, deliver cost-effective clinical outcomes,

manage our costs and expand our geographic reach.

Many of our current

and potential competitors have longer operating histories and substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, sales, distribution

and other resources than we do, which may prevent us from achieving significant market penetration or improved operating results.

Certain competitors’

products, such as competitors of SimpliDerm, are subject to a simpler reimbursement process than are

our products.

Competitors may also be able to leverage their market share and other resources to set prices at a level below that

which is profitable for us.

The occurrence of any of the above could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Furthermore, business acquisitions also involve the risk of unknown liabilities associated with the acquired business, which could be material.

Such liabilities could include lack of compliance with government regulations that could subject us to investigation, civil and criminal sanctions, litigation and/or other actions that make it impossible to realize the anticipated benefits of the transaction.

For example, we may acquire a company that was not compliant with FDA quality requirements or was making payments or other forms of remuneration to physicians to induce them to use their products.

Incurring unknown liabilities or the failure to complete or realize the anticipated benefits of an acquisition, sale, investment or other commercial arrangement, whether resulting from one or more of the factors described above or otherwise, could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

New lines of business and new products and services may subject us to additional risks.

From time to time, we may implement or acquire new lines of business or introduce new products and services within our existing business lines.

There are risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where the markets are not fully developed or are evolving.

In developing and commercializing new lines of business and new products and services, we may invest significant time and resources.

External factors, such as regulatory compliance obligations, competitive alternatives, lack of market acceptance and shifting market preferences, may also affect the successful implementation of a new line of business or a new product or service.

Failure to successfully plan for and

manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or new products or services could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face significant and continuing competition from other companies, some of which have longer operating histories, more established products and/or greater resources than we do, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We operate in highly competitive markets that are characterized by intense competition, subject to rapid change and significantly affected by new product introductions, technological advancements and other market activities of industry participants.

Our competitors have historically dedicated, and will continue to dedicate, significant resources to promote their products and to develop new products that compete with ours.

Customers in our target markets consider many factors when selecting a product, including product efficacy, ease of use, price, availability of payor coverage and adequate third-party reimbursement for procedures using the product, customer support services for technical-, clinical- and reimbursement-related matters and customer preference for, and loyalty to, particular products or a particular manufacturer.

We expect competition to remain intense as competitors introduce additional competing products and enhancements to their existing products, and continue expanding into geographic markets where we currently operate or plan to expand.

Product introductions or enhancements by competitors, which may have advanced technology, better features or lower pricing, may make our products obsolete or less competitive.

As a result, we will be required to devote continued efforts and financial resources to develop and commercialize new products and enhancements to our existing products, deliver cost-effective clinical outcomes, manage our costs and expand our geographic reach.

Many of our current and potential competitors have longer operating histories and substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, sales, distribution and other resources than we do, which may prevent us from achieving significant market penetration or improved operating results.

Certain competitors’ products, such as competitors of SimpliDerm, are subject to a simpler reimbursement process than are our products.

Competitors may also be able to leverage their market share and other resources to set prices at a level below that which is profitable for us.

These companies may also enjoy other competitive advantages, including, without limitation:

2 unchanged sentences

● more effective marketing to and education of physicians and other healthcare professionals;

greater control of key intellectual property and more expansive portfolios of intellectual property

more experience in obtaining and maintaining regulatory clearances or approvals for products and

product enhancements;

more established relationships with hospitals and other healthcare providers, physicians, suppliers,

customers and third-party payors;

additional lines of products, and the ability to bundle products to offer greater incentives to

gain a competitive advantage;

● greater control of key intellectual property and more expansive portfolios of intellectual property rights;

● more experience in obtaining and maintaining regulatory clearances, certifications or approvals for products and product enhancements;

● more established relationships with hospitals and other healthcare providers, physicians, suppliers, customers and third-party payors;

● additional lines of products, and the ability to bundle products to offer greater incentives to gain a competitive advantage;

● more established sales, marketing and worldwide distribution networks;

● better product support and service;

superior product safety, reliability and durability;

● superior product safety, reliability and durability, particularly in light of the events involving the FiberCel Recall;

● more effective pricing and revenue strategies.

more effective clinical training programs.

Our ability to achieve

and maintain profitability will depend, in part, on our ability to develop or acquire proprietary products that reach the market

in a timely manner, receive adequate coverage and reimbursement for procedures using our products, and are safer and more effective

than their alternatives, as well as our ability to otherwise compete effectively on the factors listed above.

If we are unable

to do so, our sales and/or margins will decrease, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition

and results of operations.

pressure as a result of cost-containment efforts of our customers, purchasing groups, third-party payors and governmental organizations

could adversely affect our sales and profitability.

Medical technology

companies, healthcare systems and group purchasing organizations (“GPOs”) have intensified competitive pricing pressure

as a result of industry trends and new technologies.

Rising healthcare costs have resulted in numerous cost reform initiatives

by legislators, regulators and third-party payors.

This cost reform has triggered a consolidation trend in the healthcare industry

to aggregate purchasing power and, as a result, purchasing decisions are increasingly shifting to hospitals, integrated delivery

networks (“IDNs”) and other hospital groups, and away from individual surgeons and physicians.

Many existing and potential

facility customers for our products within the United States are members of GPOs and IDNs, including accountable care organizations

or public-based purchasing organizations, and our business is partly dependent on contracts with these organizations.

of our products can be contracted under national tenders or with larger hospital GPOs.

GPOs and IDNs negotiate pricing arrangements

with healthcare product manufacturers and distributors and offer the negotiated prices to affiliated hospitals and other members.

GPOs and IDNs typically award contracts on a category-by-category basis through a competitive bidding process and, at any given

time, we are typically in various stages of responding to bids and negotiating and renewing GPO and IDN agreements.

Bids are generally

solicited from multiple manufacturers or service providers with the intention of obtaining lower pricing.

Due to the highly competitive

nature of the bidding process and the GPO and IDN contracting processes in the United States, we may not be able to obtain or maintain

contract positions with major GPOs and IDNs across our product portfolio.

Furthermore, GPO and IDN contracts are typically terminable

without cause upon 60 to 90 days’

In addition, while having a contract with a major purchaser for a given product

category can facilitate sales, there can be no guarantee that sales volumes for those products will be maintained.

GPOs and IDNs are increasingly awarding contracts to multiple suppliers for the same product category and, even when we are the

sole contracted supplier of a GPO or IDN for a certain product category, members of the GPO or IDN are generally free to purchase

from other suppliers.

If we are unable to maintain and renew our contracts with our current GPO and IDN customers and negotiate

contracts with new customers on favorable terms, or if sales volumes under these agreements decline, our business, financial condition

and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

In addition, most

of our customers purchase our products directly and then bill third-party payors for procedures using those products.

Because there

is typically no separate reimbursement for supplies used in surgical procedures, the additional cost associated with the use of

our products can affect the profit margin of the hospital or surgery center where the procedure is performed.

Some of our target

customers may be unwilling to adopt our products in light of the additional associated cost or may negotiate for lower pricing.

Further, any decline in the amount payors are willing to reimburse our customers for procedures using our products, including those

as a result of healthcare reform initiatives, could make it difficult for existing customers to continue using or to adopt our

products and could create additional pricing pressure for us.

In addition to these competitive forces, we continue to see pricing

pressure as hospitals introduce new pricing structures into their contracts and agreements, including fixed price formulas, capitated

pricing and episodic or bundled payments intended to contain healthcare costs.

If we are forced to lower the price we charge for

our products, our margins will decrease, which could impair our ability to grow our business and have a material adverse effect

on our business, financial condition and results of operations and impair our ability to grow our business.

Outside the United

States, centralized governmental healthcare authorities may exert pricing pressures in an effort to lower healthcare costs.

Implementation

of healthcare reforms and competitive bidding contract tenders may limit the price or the level at which reimbursement is provided

for our products and adversely affect both our pricing flexibility and the demand for our products.

Healthcare providers may respond

to such cost-containment pressures by substituting lower-cost products or other therapies for our products.

Our failure to offer

acceptable prices to these customers could adversely affect our sales and profitability in these markets.

We expect that market

demand, government regulation, third-party coverage and reimbursement policies and societal pressures will continue to change the

healthcare industry worldwide, resulting in further business consolidations and alliances among our customers, which may exert

further downward pressure on the prices for our products.

The processing

of human and porcine tissue for our products is technically complex, requiring high levels of quality control and precision, which

subjects us to increased production risks.

We manufacture our

human and porcine tissue products using technically complex processes requiring specialized facilities, highly specific raw materials,

skill and diligence by our personnel and other production constraints.

The complexity of these processes, as well as strict company

and government standards for the manufacture and storage of our products, subjects us to production risks.

In addition to ongoing

production risks, process deviations or unanticipated effects of approved process changes may result in non-compliance with regulatory

requirements, including stability requirements or specifications.

For example, our bone allograft products FiberCel, ViBone and

OsteGro V, must be shipped and maintained within a specified temperature range.

If environmental conditions deviate from that range,

our products’

remaining shelf-lives could be impaired or their safety and efficacy could be adversely affected, making them

unsuitable for use.

The occurrence of this or any other actual or suspected production or distribution problem can lead to lost

inventories, customer returns and, in some cases, recalls, with consequential damage to our reputation and customer relationships

and the risk of product liability.

The investigation and remediation of any potential or identified problems can cause production

delays and result in substantial additional expenses and lost revenue.

In addition, we may experience difficulties in scaling up

processing and production of our human and porcine tissue products, including problems related to yields, quality control and assurance,

tissue availability, adequacy of control policies and procedures and availability of skilled personnel.

Furthermore, developing

and maintaining our production capabilities has required, and will continue to require, the investment of significant resources,

and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to achieve economies of scale.

If we are unable to process and produce our human tissue

products on a timely basis, at acceptable quality and costs and in sufficient quantities, or if we experience technological problems,

delays in production, failure in the storage of our products or other loss of supply, our business would be materially and adversely

issues, service interruptions or price increases by our shipping carriers could adversely affect our business, harm our reputation

and impair our ability to provide our products on a timely basis or at all.

Expedited, reliable

shipping is essential to our operations.

We rely heavily on providers of transport services for reliable, timely and secure point-to-point

transport of our products to our customers and for tracking of these shipments.

Should a carrier encounter delivery performance

issues such as loss, delays, damage or destruction of any of our products, it would be costly to replace these products in a timely

manner and such occurrences may damage our reputation and lead to decreased demand for our products and increased cost and expense

to our business.

This risk is particularly high with respect to FiberCel, ViBone and OsteGro V, which must be shipped and maintained

within a specified temperature range.

In addition, any significant increase in shipping rates could adversely affect our operating

margins and results of operations.

Similarly, strikes, severe weather, natural disasters, equipment malfunctions or other service

interruptions affecting the delivery services we use, would impair our ability to process orders for our products on a timely basis

or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If our facilities

are damaged or become inoperable, we will be unable to continue to research, develop and supply our products and, as a result,

there will be an adverse effect on our business until we are able to secure new facilities and rebuild our inventory.

We do not have redundant

We perform most of our research and development activity and manufacture our tissue-based products at our facility

in Richmond, California.

The SIS ECM biomaterial used in our medical device products are manufactured by Cook Biotech at their

facility in West Lafayette, Indiana and converted to a finished product at our facility in Roswell, Georgia.

Regulatory approvals

of our products are limited to one or more specifically approved manufacturing facilities.

As a result, if we fail to produce enough

of a product at a facility, or if any of our production facilities were to be shut down or otherwise become unavailable for any

reason, finding alternative manufacturing capabilities and obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals would require a considerable

amount of time and expense and would cause a significant disruption in service to our customers.

Disruption to our

facilities could arise for a variety of reasons, including technical, labor or other difficulties, equipment malfunction, contamination

due to a COVID-19 infection or otherwise, the failure of our employees to follow specific protocols and procedures, the destruction

of, or damage to, any facility (as a result of a natural or man-made disaster, including, but not limited to, a tornado, flood,

fire, power outage or other event), quality control issues or other reasons.

Any disruption in the operation of our facilities

as a result of any of the above could impair our product development and commercialization efforts and result in lost sales, lost

customers and harm to our reputation, any of which would negatively impact our growth prospects and profitability and have a material

adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, certain of these events, such as natural

or man-made disasters, would cause us to incur additional losses, including the time and expense required to repair and/or replace

our equipment and to rebuild our inventory.

Although we possess insurance for damage to our property and the disruption of our

business, this insurance may not be sufficient to cover all of our potential losses and may not continue to be available to us

on acceptable terms or at all.

we depend upon a limited number of third-party suppliers and manufacturers and, in certain cases, exclusive suppliers for products

essential to our business, we may incur significant product development costs and experience material delivery delays if we lose

any significant supplier, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We obtain some of

our raw materials from a limited group of suppliers and rely on a single supplier to source the SIS ECM biomaterial used to manufacture

CanGaroo and our cardiovascular products for reasons of quality assurance, cost-effectiveness, availability or constraints resulting

from regulatory requirements.

For us to be successful, our suppliers must be able to provide us with products and components in

substantial quantities, in compliance with regulatory requirements, in accordance with agreed upon specifications, at acceptable

costs and on a timely basis.

Our efforts to maintain a continuity of supply and high quality and reliability may not be successful

on a timely basis or at all.

Our ability to achieve and maintain profitability will depend, in part, on our ability to develop or acquire proprietary products that reach the market in a timely manner, receive adequate coverage and reimbursement for procedures using our products, and are safer and more effective than their alternatives, as well as our ability to otherwise compete effectively on the factors listed above.

If we are unable to do so, our sales and/or margins will decrease, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Pricing pressure as a result of cost-containment efforts of our customers, purchasing groups, third-party payors and governmental organizations could adversely affect our sales and profitability.

Medical technology companies, healthcare systems and group purchasing organizations (“GPOs”) have intensified competitive pricing pressure as a result of industry trends and new technologies.

Rising healthcare costs have resulted in numerous cost reform initiatives by legislators, regulators and third-party payors.

This cost reform has triggered a consolidation trend in the healthcare industry to aggregate purchasing power and, as a result, purchasing decisions are increasingly shifting to hospitals, integrated delivery networks (“IDNs”) and other hospital groups, and away from individual surgeons and physicians.

Many existing and potential facility customers for our products within the United States are members of GPOs and IDNs, including accountable care organizations or public-based purchasing organizations, and our business is partly dependent on contracts with these organizations.

Purchases of our products can be contracted under national tenders or with larger hospital GPOs.

GPOs and IDNs negotiate pricing arrangements with healthcare product manufacturers and distributors and offer the negotiated prices to affiliated hospitals and other members.

GPOs and IDNs typically award contracts on a category-by-category basis through a competitive bidding process and, at any given time, we are typically in various stages of responding to bids and negotiating and renewing GPO and IDN agreements.

Bids are generally solicited from multiple manufacturers or service providers with the intention of obtaining lower pricing.

Due to the highly competitive nature of the bidding process and the GPO and IDN contracting processes in the United States, we may not be able to obtain or maintain contract positions with major GPOs and IDNs across our product portfolio.

Furthermore, GPO and IDN contracts are typically terminable without cause upon 60 to 90 days’ notice.

In addition, while having a contract with a major purchaser for a given product category can facilitate sales, there can be no guarantee that sales volumes for those products will be maintained.

For example, GPOs and IDNs are increasingly awarding contracts to multiple suppliers for the same product category and, even when we are the sole contracted supplier of a GPO or IDN for a certain product category, members of the GPO or IDN are generally free to purchase from other suppliers.

If we are unable to maintain and renew our contracts with our current GPO and IDN customers and negotiate contracts with new customers on favorable terms, or if sales volumes under these agreements decline, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

In addition, most of our customers purchase our products directly and then bill third-party payors for procedures using those products.

Because there is typically no separate reimbursement for supplies used in surgical procedures, the additional cost associated with the use of our products can affect the profit margin of the hospital or surgery center where the procedure is performed.

Some of our target customers may be unwilling to adopt our products in light of the additional associated cost or may negotiate for lower pricing.

Further, any decline in the amount payors are willing to reimburse our customers for procedures using our products, including those as a result of healthcare reform initiatives, could make it difficult for existing customers to continue using or to adopt our products and could create additional pricing pressure for us.

In addition to these competitive forces, we continue to see pricing pressure as hospitals introduce new pricing structures into their contracts and agreements, including fixed price formulas, capitated pricing and episodic or bundled payments intended to contain healthcare costs.

If we are forced to lower the price we charge for our products, our margins will decrease, which could impair our ability to grow our business and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and impair our ability to grow our business.

Outside the United States, centralized governmental healthcare authorities may exert pricing pressures in an effort to lower healthcare costs.

Implementation of healthcare reforms and competitive bidding contract tenders may limit the price or the level at which reimbursement is provided for our products and adversely affect both our pricing flexibility and the demand for our products.

Healthcare providers may respond to such cost-containment pressures by substituting lower-cost products or other therapies for our products.

Our failure to offer acceptable prices to these customers could adversely affect our sales and profitability in these markets.

We expect that market demand, government regulation, third-party coverage and reimbursement policies and societal pressures will continue to change the healthcare industry worldwide, resulting in further business consolidations and alliances among our customers, which may exert further downward pressure on the prices for our products.

The processing of human and porcine tissue for our products is technically complex, requiring high levels of quality control and precision, which subjects us to increased production risks.

We manufacture our human and porcine tissue products using technically complex processes requiring specialized facilities, highly specific raw materials, skill and diligence by our personnel and other production constraints.

The complexity of these processes, as well as strict company and government standards for the manufacture and storage of our products, subjects us to production risks.

In addition to ongoing production risks, process deviations or unanticipated effects of approved process changes may result in non-compliance with regulatory requirements, including stability requirements or specifications.

For example, our bone allograft products, such as ViBone and OsteGro V, must be shipped and maintained within a specified temperature range.

If environmental conditions deviate from that range, our products’ remaining shelf-lives could be impaired or their safety and efficacy could be adversely affected, making them unsuitable for use.

The occurrence of this or any other actual or suspected production or distribution problem can lead to lost inventory, customer returns and, in some cases, recalls, with consequential damage to our reputation and customer relationships and the risk of product liability.

For example, in June 2021, we issued a voluntary recall pertaining to a single donor lot of our FiberCel Fiber Viable Bone Matrix, a bone repair product made from human tissue that is used in various orthopedic and spinal procedures.

Notice of the voluntary recall was issued to hospitals that received product from this specific lot following our learning of post-surgical infections in patients treated with FiberCel, including some patients that tested positive for tuberculosis.

The lot consisted of 154 units of FiberCel, all derived from a single donor, that were shipped to facilities in 20 states.

We have investigated the source of the infections in coordination with our distributor, the FDA and the U.S.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”).

The FDA inspected our Richmond, California production facility, and this inspection did not result in any Form-483 observations.

Additionally, multiple product liability lawsuits have been filed against us.

See “We face the risk of product liability claims and may not be able to obtain or maintain adequate product liability insurance” for additional information about these product liability lawsuits.

This investigation, as well as others that may occur in the future, and the remediation of any potential or identified problems can cause production delays and result in substantial additional expenses and lost revenue.

In addition, we may experience difficulties in scaling up processing and production of our human and porcine tissue products, including problems related to yields, quality control and assurance, tissue availability, adequacy of control policies and procedures and availability of skilled personnel.

Furthermore, developing and maintaining our production capabilities has required, and will continue to require, the investment of significant resources, and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to achieve economies of scale.

If we are unable to process and produce our human tissue products on a timely basis, at acceptable quality and costs and in sufficient quantities, or if we experience technological problems, delays in production, failure in the storage of our products or other loss of supply, our business would be materially and adversely affected.

Performance issues, service interruptions or price increases by our shipping carriers could adversely affect our business, harm our reputation and impair our ability to provide our products on a timely basis or at all.

Expedited, reliable shipping is essential to our operations.

We rely heavily on providers of transport services for reliable, timely and secure point-to-point transport of our products to our customers and for tracking of these shipments.

Should a carrier encounter delivery performance issues such as loss, delays, damage or destruction of any of our products, it would be costly to replace these products in a timely manner and such occurrences may damage our reputation and lead to decreased demand for our products and increased cost and expense to our business.

This risk is particularly high with respect to ViBone, Fiber VBM, and OsteGro V, all of which must be shipped and maintained within a specified temperature range.

In addition, any significant increase in shipping rates could adversely affect our operating margins and results of operations.

Similarly, strikes, severe weather, natural disasters, equipment malfunctions or other service interruptions affecting the delivery services we use, would impair our ability to process orders for our products on a timely basis or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If our facilities are damaged or become inoperable, we will be unable to continue to research, develop and supply our products and, as a result, there will be an adverse effect on our business until we are able to secure new facilities and rebuild our inventory.

We do not have redundant facilities.

We perform most of our research and development activity and manufacture our tissue-based products at our facility in Richmond, California.

The SIS ECM biomaterial used in our medical device products are manufactured by Cook Biotech at their facility in West Lafayette, Indiana and converted to a finished product at our facility in Roswell, Georgia.

Regulatory approvals or certifications of our products are limited to one or more specifically approved manufacturing facilities.

As a result, if we fail to produce enough of a product at a facility, or if any of our production facilities were to be shut down or otherwise become unavailable for any reason, finding alternative manufacturing capabilities and obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals or certifications would require a considerable amount of time and expense and would cause a significant disruption in service to our customers.

Disruption to our facilities could arise for a variety of reasons, including technical, labor or other difficulties, equipment malfunction, contamination due to a COVID-19 infection or otherwise, the failure of our employees to follow specific protocols and procedures, the destruction of, or damage to, any facility (as a result of a natural or man-made disaster, including, but not limited to, a tornado, flood, fire, power outage or other event), quality control issues or other reasons.

Any disruption in the operation of our facilities as a result of any of the above could impair our product development and commercialization efforts and result in lost sales, lost customers and harm to our reputation, any of which would negatively impact our growth prospects and profitability and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, certain of these events, such as natural or man-made disasters, would cause us to incur additional losses, including the time and expense required to repair and/or replace our equipment and to rebuild our inventory.

Our insurance for damage to our property and the disruption of our business may not be sufficient to cover all of our potential losses and may not continue to be available to us on acceptable terms or at all.

Because we depend upon a limited number of third-party suppliers and manufacturers and, in certain cases, exclusive suppliers for products essential to our business, we may incur significant product development costs and experience material delivery delays if we lose any significant supplier, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We obtain some of our raw materials from a limited group of suppliers and rely on a single supplier to source the SIS ECM biomaterial used to manufacture CanGaroo and our cardiovascular products for reasons of quality assurance, cost-effectiveness, availability or constraints resulting from regulatory requirements.

For us to be successful, our suppliers must be able to provide us with products and components in substantial quantities, in compliance with regulatory requirements, in accordance with agreed upon specifications, at acceptable costs and on a timely basis.

Our efforts to maintain a continuity of supply and high quality and reliability may not be successful on a timely basis or at all.

Manufacturing disruptions experienced by our suppliers may jeopardize our supply of finished products.

Due to the stringent regulations and requirements of the FDA and other similar non-U.S.

regulatory agencies regarding the manufacture

of our products, we may not be able to quickly establish additional or replacement sources for certain raw materials.

in suppliers could require significant effort or investment in circumstances where the items supplied are integral to product performance

or incorporate unique technology.

Transitioning to a new supplier could be time-consuming and expensive, may result in interruptions

in our operations and product delivery, could affect the performance specifications of our products or could require that we modify

the design of those systems.

A reduction or interruption

in manufacturing, or an inability to secure alternative sources of raw materials or components, could have a material and adverse

effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

One or more of our suppliers may refuse to extend

us credit with respect to our purchasing or leasing of equipment, supplies, products or components, or may only agree to extend

us credit on significantly less favorable terms or subject to more onerous conditions.

This could significantly disrupt our ability

to purchase or lease required equipment, supplies, products and components in a cost-effective and timely manner, and could have

a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Any casualty, natural disaster or other

disruption of any of our sole-source suppliers’

operations, for example due to a COVID-19 infection of employees of the supplier,

or any unexpected loss of any existing exclusive supply contract, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial

condition and results of operations.

In addition, if a change in manufacturer results in a significant change to any product, a

new 510(k) clearance from the FDA or similar international regulatory authorization may be necessary before we implement the change,

which could cause substantial delays.

of our products are dependent on the availability of tissue from human donors, and any disruption in supply could adversely affect

our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The products we manufacture

for the orthopedic/spinal repair and soft tissue reconstruction markets, as well as our contract manufacturing products, require

that we obtain human tissue.

regulatory agencies regarding the manufacture of our products, we may not be able to quickly establish additional or replacement sources for certain raw materials.

A change in suppliers could require significant effort or investment in circumstances where the items supplied are integral to product performance or incorporate unique technology.

Transitioning to a new supplier could be time-consuming and expensive, may result in interruptions in our operations and product delivery, could affect the performance specifications of our products or could require that we modify the design of those systems.

A reduction or interruption in manufacturing, or an inability to secure alternative sources of raw materials or components, could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

One or more of our suppliers may refuse to extend us credit with respect to our purchasing or leasing of equipment, supplies, products or components, or may only agree to extend us credit on significantly less favorable terms or subject to more onerous conditions.

This could significantly disrupt our ability to purchase or lease required equipment, supplies, products and components in a cost-effective and timely manner, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Any casualty, natural disaster or other disruption of any of our sole-source suppliers’ operations, for example due to a COVID-19 infection of employees of the supplier, or any unexpected loss of any existing exclusive supply contract, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, if a change in manufacturer results in a significant change to any product, a new 510(k) clearance

from the FDA or similar international regulatory authorization may be necessary before we implement the change, which could cause substantial delays.

Certain of our products are dependent on the availability of tissue from human donors, and any disruption in supply could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The products we manufacture for the orthopedic/spinal repair and soft tissue reconstruction markets, as well as our contract manufacturing products, require that we obtain human tissue.

The success of our business depends, in part, on the availability of tissue from human donors.

inability to obtain tissue from our sources will interfere with our ability to effectively meet demand for these products.

recovery of human tissue for our products is very labor-intensive, and it is, therefore, difficult to maintain a steady supply

In addition, the availability of acceptable donors is relatively limited and may be impacted by regulatory changes, general

public opinion of the donation process and the reputation of our company and the third-party procurement firms with which we partner

to manage the donation process.

Media reports or other negative publicity concerning both improper methods of tissue recovery from

donors and disease transmission from donated tissue, including bones and dermis, may limit widespread acceptance of our products.

Unfavorable reports of improper or illegal tissue recovery practices, both in the United States and internationally, as well as

incidents of improperly processed tissue leading to transmission of disease, may broadly affect the rate of future tissue donation

and market acceptance of allograft technologies and donated tissue use.

Potential patients may not be able to distinguish our products,

technologies and tissue recovery and processing procedures from others engaged in tissue recovery.

In addition, unfavorable reports

about us or any of our third-party procurement firms may make families of potential donors or donors themselves, from whom we are

required to obtain consent before processing tissue, reluctant to agree to donate tissue to for-profit tissue processors.

Any disruption

in the supply of any human tissue component could materially harm our ability to manufacture our products until a new source of

supply, if any, could be found.

We may be unable to find a sufficient alternative supply channel within a reasonable period of

time, on commercially reasonable terms or at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition

and results of operations.

prices for raw materials used in our products could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our profitability

is affected by the prices of the raw materials used in the manufacture of our products.

These prices may fluctuate based on a number

of factors beyond our control, including changes in supply and demand, general economic conditions, labor costs, delivery costs,

competition, import duties, excises and other indirect taxes, currency exchange rates and government regulation.

Due to the highly

competitive nature of the healthcare industry and the cost containment efforts of our customers and third-party payors, we may

be unable to pass along cost increases for key components or raw materials through higher prices to our customers.

of key components or raw materials increases, and we are unable to fully recover these increased costs through price increases

or offset these increases through other cost reductions, we could experience lower margins and profitability.

Significant increases

in the prices of raw materials that cannot be recovered through productivity gains, price increases or other methods could adversely

affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

not able to accurately forecast demand for our products and manage our inventory, our margins could decrease and we could lose

sales, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

While we must maintain

sufficient inventory levels to operate our business successfully and meet customer demand for our products, we must be careful

to avoid amassing excess inventory.

To ensure adequate inventory supply, we must forecast inventory needs and place orders with

our suppliers based on our estimates of future demand for our products.

Demand for our products can change rapidly and unexpectedly,

including during the time between when raw materials are ordered from our suppliers and the finished product is offered for sale.

Our ability to accurately forecast demand for our products could be negatively affected by a number of factors, many of which are

beyond our control, including our failure to accurately manage our expansion strategy, product introductions by competitors, an

increase or decrease in customer demand for our products or for products of our competitors, our failure to accurately forecast

customer acceptance of new products, unanticipated changes in general market conditions, reimbursement or regulatory matters and

weakening of economic conditions.

Inventory levels that exceed the demand for our products may result in inventory write-downs

or write-offs, which would adversely affect our gross margins.

For example, in 2019, our launch of SimpliDerm resulted in reduced

demand for certain of our other dermis inventory and resulted in inventory write-downs.

Conversely, if we underestimate demand

for our products, additional supplies of raw materials or additional manufacturing capacity may not be available when required

on terms that are acceptable to us or at all, and suppliers or our third-party manufacturer may not be able to allocate sufficient

capacity in order to meet our increased requirements.

As a result, we may not be able to meet customer demand for our products,

resulting in lost sales and potential damage to our reputation and customer relationships, any of which would adversely affect

our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, while

we seek to maintain sufficient levels of inventory in order to protect ourselves from supply interruptions, our products generally

have a shelf life of two to three years.

We are, therefore, subject to the risk that a portion of our inventory will become obsolete

or expire, which could have a material adverse effect on our profitability and cash flows due to the resulting inventory impairment

charges and costs required to replace such inventory.

and other healthcare providers are unable to obtain coverage or adequate reimbursement for procedures performed with our products,

it is unlikely our products will be widely used.

In the United States,

the commercial success of our existing products and any products we may develop or acquire in the future will depend, in part,

on the extent to which governmental payors at the federal and state levels, including Medicare and Medicaid, private health insurers

and other third-party payors, provide coverage and establish adequate reimbursement levels for procedures utilizing our products.

Hospitals and other healthcare providers that purchase our products for treatment of their patients generally rely on third-party

payors to pay for all or part of the costs and fees associated with our products as part of a “bundled”

associated procedures.

The existence of coverage and adequate reimbursement for procedures using our products by government and

private payors is critical to market acceptance of our existing and future products.

Neither hospitals nor surgeons are likely

to use our products if they do not receive adequate reimbursement for the procedures utilizing our products.

Many private payors

currently base their reimbursement policies on the coverage decisions and payment amounts determined by the CMS which administers

the Medicare program.

Others may adopt different coverage or reimbursement policies for procedures performed with our products,

while some governmental programs, such as Medicaid, have reimbursement policies that vary from state to state, some of which may

not pay for the procedures performed with our products in an adequate amount, if at all.

Because the Medicare and Medicaid programs

are increasingly used as models for how private payors and other governmental payors develop their coverage and reimbursement policies,

a Medicare national or local non-coverage decision, denying coverage for procedures using one or more of our products, could result

in private and other third-party payors also denying coverage.

Third-party payors also may deny reimbursement for procedures using

our products if they determine that a product used in a procedure was not medically necessary, was not used in accordance with

cost-effective treatment methods, as determined by the third-party payor, or was used for an unapproved use.

Unfavorable coverage

or reimbursement decisions by government programs or private payors underscore the uncertainty that our products face in the market

and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Many hospitals and

clinics in the United States belong to GPOs, which typically incentivize their hospital members to make a relatively large proportion

of purchases of similar products from a limited number of vendors that have contracted to offer discounted prices.

Such contracts

often include exceptions for purchasing certain innovative new technologies, however.

Accordingly, the commercial success of our

products may also depend to some extent on our ability to either negotiate favorable purchase contracts with key group purchasing

organizations and/or persuade hospitals and clinics to purchase our product “off contract.”

The healthcare industry

in the United States has experienced a trend toward cost containment as government and private payors seek to control healthcare

costs by paying service providers lower rates.

While it is expected that hospitals will be able to obtain coverage for procedures

using our products, the level of payment available to them for such procedures may change over time.

State and federal healthcare

programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, closely regulate provider payment levels and have sought to contain, and sometimes reduce,

payment levels.

Private payors frequently follow government payment policies and are likewise interested in controlling increases

in the cost of medical care.

In addition, some payors are adopting pay-for-performance programs that differentiate payments to

healthcare providers based on the achievement of documented quality-of-care metrics, cost efficiencies or patient outcomes.

programs are intended to provide incentives to providers to deliver the same or better results while consuming fewer resources.

As a result of these programs, and related payor efforts to reduce payment levels, hospitals and other providers are seeking ways

to reduce their costs, including the amounts they pay to medical device manufacturers.

We may not be able to sell our products

profitably if third-party payors deny or discontinue coverage or reduce their levels of payment below that which we project, or

if our production costs increase at a greater rate than payment levels.

Adverse changes in payment rates by payors to hospitals

could adversely impact our ability to market and sell our products and negatively affect our financial performance.

In international markets,

medical device regulatory requirements and healthcare payment systems vary significantly from country to country, and many countries

have instituted price ceilings on specific product lines.

We cannot assure you that our products will be considered cost-effective

by international third-party payors, that reimbursement will be available or, if available, that the third-party payors’

reimbursement policies will not adversely affect our ability to sell our products profitably.

Any failure to receive regulatory

or reimbursement approvals would negatively impact market acceptance of our products in any international markets in which those

approvals are sought.

the risk of product liability claims and may not be able to obtain or maintain adequate product liability insurance.

Our business exposes

us to the risk of product liability claims that are inherent in the manufacturing, processing, investigating and marketing of medical

devices and human and animal tissue products.

We are, and may in the future be, subject to product liability claims and lawsuits,

including potential class actions or mass tort claims, alleging that our products have resulted or could result in an unsafe condition

Any inability to obtain tissue from our sources will interfere with our ability to effectively meet demand for these products.

The recovery of human tissue for our products is very labor-intensive, and it is, therefore, difficult to maintain a steady supply stream.

In addition, the availability of acceptable donors is relatively limited and may be impacted by regulatory changes, general public opinion of the donation process and the reputation of our company and the third-party procurement firms with which we partner to manage the donation process.

Media reports or other negative publicity concerning both improper methods of tissue recovery from donors and disease transmission from donated tissue, including bones and dermis, may limit widespread acceptance of our products.

Unfavorable reports of improper or illegal tissue recovery practices, both in the United States and internationally, as well as incidents of improperly processed tissue leading to transmission of disease, may broadly affect the rate of future tissue donation and market acceptance of allograft technologies and donated tissue use.

Potential patients may not be able to distinguish our products, technologies and tissue recovery and processing procedures from others engaged in tissue recovery.

In addition, unfavorable reports about us or any of our third-party procurement firms may make families of potential donors or donors themselves, from whom we are required to obtain consent before processing tissue, reluctant to agree to donate tissue to for-profit tissue processors.

Any disruption in the supply of any human tissue component could materially harm our ability to manufacture our products until a new source of supply, if any, could be found.

We may be unable to find a sufficient alternative supply channel within a reasonable period of time, on commercially reasonable terms or at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Increased prices for raw materials used in our products could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our profitability is affected by the prices of the raw materials used in the manufacture of our products.

These prices may fluctuate based on a number of factors beyond our control, including changes in supply and demand, general economic conditions, labor costs, delivery costs, competition, import duties, excises and other indirect taxes, currency exchange rates and government regulation.

Due to the highly competitive nature of the healthcare industry and the cost containment efforts of our customers and third-party payors, we may be unable to pass along cost increases for key components or raw materials through higher prices to our customers.

If the cost of key components or raw materials increases, and we are unable to fully recover these increased costs through price increases or offset these increases through other cost reductions, we could experience lower margins and profitability.

Significant increases in the prices of raw materials that cannot be recovered through productivity gains, price increases or other methods could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we are not able to accurately forecast demand for our products and manage our inventory, our margins could decrease and we could lose sales, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

While we must maintain sufficient inventory levels to operate our business successfully and meet customer demand for our products, we must be careful to avoid amassing excess inventory.

To ensure adequate inventory supply, we must forecast inventory needs and place orders with our suppliers based on our estimates of future demand for our products.

Demand for our products can change, and has changed, rapidly and unexpectedly, including during the time between when raw materials are ordered from our suppliers and the finished product is offered for sale.

Our ability to accurately forecast demand for our products could be negatively affected by a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including our failure to accurately manage our expansion strategy, product introductions by competitors, an increase or decrease in customer demand for our products or for products of our competitors, our failure to accurately forecast customer acceptance of new products, unanticipated changes in general market conditions, reimbursement or regulatory matters and weakening of economic conditions.

Inventory levels that exceed the demand for

our products may result in inventory write-downs or write-offs, which would adversely affect our gross margins.

For example, since our launch of SimpliDerm 2019, evolving demand for different dimensions of the product has resulted in excess inventory write-downs.

Conversely, if we underestimate demand for our products, additional supplies of raw materials or additional manufacturing capacity may not be available when required on terms that are acceptable to us or at all, and suppliers or our third-party manufacturer may not be able to allocate sufficient capacity in order to meet our increased requirements.

As a result, we may not be able to meet customer demand for our products, resulting in lost sales and potential damage to our reputation and customer relationships, any of which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, while we seek to maintain sufficient levels of inventory in order to protect ourselves from supply interruptions, our products generally have a shelf life of two to three years.

We are, therefore, subject to the risk that a portion of our inventory will become obsolete or expire, which could have a material adverse effect on our profitability and cash flows due to the resulting inventory impairment charges and costs required to replace such inventory.

If hospitals and other healthcare providers are unable to obtain coverage or adequate reimbursement for procedures performed with our products, it is unlikely our products will be widely used.

In the United States, the commercial success of our existing products and any products we may develop or acquire in the future will depend, in part, on the extent to which governmental payors at the federal and state levels, including Medicare and Medicaid, private health insurers and other third-party payors, provide coverage and establish adequate reimbursement levels for procedures utilizing our products.

Hospitals and other healthcare providers that purchase our products for treatment of their patients generally rely on third-party payors to pay for all or part of the costs and fees associated with our products as part of a “bundled” rate for the associated procedures.

The existence of coverage and adequate reimbursement for procedures using our products by government and private payors is critical to market acceptance of our existing and future products.

Neither hospitals nor surgeons are likely to use our products if they do not receive adequate reimbursement for the procedures utilizing our products.

Many private payors currently base their reimbursement policies on the coverage decisions and payment amounts determined by the CMS which administers the Medicare program.

Others may adopt different coverage or reimbursement policies for procedures performed with our products, while some governmental programs, such as Medicaid, have reimbursement policies that vary from state to state, some of which may not pay for the procedures performed with our products in an adequate amount, if at all.

Because the Medicare and Medicaid programs are increasingly used as models for how private payors and other governmental payors develop their coverage and reimbursement policies, a Medicare national or local non-coverage decision, denying coverage for procedures using one or more of our products, could result in private and other third-party payors also denying coverage.

Third-party payors also may deny reimbursement for procedures using our products if they determine that a product used in a procedure was not medically necessary, was not used in accordance with cost-effective treatment methods, as determined by the third-party payor, or was used for an unapproved use.

Unfavorable coverage or reimbursement decisions by government programs or private payors underscore the uncertainty that our products face in the market and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Many hospitals and clinics in the United States belong to GPOs, which typically incentivize their hospital members to make a relatively large proportion of purchases of similar products from a limited number of vendors that have contracted to offer discounted prices.

Such contracts often include exceptions for purchasing certain innovative new technologies, however.

Accordingly, the commercial success of our products may also depend to some extent on our ability to either negotiate favorable purchase contracts with key GPOs and/or persuade hospitals and clinics to purchase our product “off contract.”

The healthcare industry in the United States has experienced a trend toward cost containment as government and private payors seek to control healthcare costs by paying service providers lower rates.

While it is expected that hospitals will be able to obtain coverage for procedures using our products, the level of payment available to them for such procedures may change over time.

State and federal healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, closely regulate provider payment levels and have sought to contain, and sometimes reduce, payment levels.

Private payors frequently follow government payment policies and are likewise interested in controlling increases in the cost of medical care.

In addition, some payors are adopting pay-for-performance programs that differentiate payments to healthcare providers

based on the achievement of documented quality-of-care metrics, cost efficiencies or patient outcomes.

These programs are intended to provide incentives to providers to deliver the same or better results while consuming fewer resources.

As a result of these programs, and related payor efforts to reduce payment levels, hospitals and other providers are seeking ways to reduce their costs, including the amounts they pay to medical device manufacturers.

We may not be able to sell our products profitably if third-party payors deny or discontinue coverage or reduce their levels of payment below that which we project, or if our production costs increase at a greater rate than payment levels.

Adverse changes in payment rates by payors to hospitals could adversely impact our ability to market and sell our products and negatively affect our financial performance.

In international markets, medical device regulatory requirements and healthcare payment systems vary significantly from country to country, and many countries have instituted price ceilings on specific product lines.

We cannot assure you that our products will be considered cost-effective by international third-party payors, that reimbursement will be available or, if available, that the third-party payors’ reimbursement policies will not adversely affect our ability to sell our products profitably.

Any failure to receive regulatory or reimbursement approvals would negatively impact market acceptance of our products in any international markets in which those approvals are sought.

We face the risk of product liability claims and may not be able to obtain or maintain adequate product liability insurance.

Our business exposes us to the risk of product liability claims that are inherent in the manufacturing, processing, investigating and marketing of medical devices and human and animal tissue products.

For example, since the voluntary recall pertaining to a single donor lot of our FiberCel Fiber Viable Bone Matrix was issued, and as of February 17, 2022, we have received notice of 45 separate lawsuits alleging that the plaintiffs contracted tuberculosis and/or suffered substantial symptoms and complications following the implantation of FiberCel during spinal fusion operations.

We are, and may in the future be, subject to product liability claims and lawsuits, including potential class actions or mass tort claims, alleging that our products have resulted or could result in an unsafe condition or injury.

Product liability claims may be made by patients and their families, healthcare providers or others selling our products.

Product liability claims may include, among other things, allegations of defects in manufacturing, defects in design, a failure

to warn of dangers inherent in the product, negligence, strict liability or a breach of warranties.

We may be subject to such claims

even if the apparent injury is due to the actions of others or the pre-existing health of the patient.

For example, we rely on

physicians and other healthcare providers to properly and correctly use our products.

If these physicians or other healthcare providers

are not properly trained or are negligent in using our products, the capabilities of our products may be diminished or the patient

may suffer critical injury.

In addition, we may be subject to product liability claims, as well as a number of other risks, as

a result of physicians and other healthcare providers using our products “off-label.”

See “—

or off-label use of our products may harm our reputation in the marketplace, result in injuries that lead to product liability

suits or result in costly investigations, fines or sanctions by regulatory bodies if we are deemed to have engaged in the promotion

of these uses, any of which could be costly to our business.

Defending a lawsuit,

regardless of merit, could be costly, divert management attention and result in adverse publicity, which could result in the withdrawal

of, or reduced acceptance of, our products in the market.

If we cannot successfully defend against product liability claims, we

could incur substantial liability and costs.

In addition, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, product liability claims may

Product liability claims may include, among other things, allegations of defects in manufacturing, defects in design, a failure to warn of dangers inherent in the product, negligence, strict liability or a breach of warranties.

For example, we and certain Medtronic entities have been named in complaints alleging that plaintiffs contracted tuberculosis following the implantation of FiberCel during spinal fusion operations and seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages and medical monitoring.

See Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” and Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Additionally, we may be subject to product liability claims, proceedings and lawsuits, even if the apparent injury is due to the actions of others or the pre-existing health of the patient.

For example, we rely on physicians and other healthcare providers to properly and correctly use our products.

If these physicians or other healthcare providers are not properly trained or are negligent in using our products, the capabilities of our products may be diminished or the patient may suffer critical injury.

In addition, we may be subject to product liability claims, as well as a number of other risks, as a result of physicians and other healthcare providers using our products “off-label.” See the risk factor entitled “ The misuse or off-label use of our products may harm our reputation in the marketplace, result in injuries that lead to product liability suits or result in costly investigations, fines or sanctions by regulatory bodies if we are deemed to have engaged in the promotion of these uses, any of which could be costly to our business ” included in this Annual Report.

Defending any current or future claims, proceedings or lawsuits, regardless of merit, could be costly, divert management attention and result in adverse publicity, which could result in the withdrawal of, or reduced acceptance of, our products in the market.

If we cannot successfully defend against product liability claims, we could incur substantial liability and costs.

In addition, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, product liability claims may result in:

● harm to our business reputation;

1 unchanged sentence

● significant legal costs;

distraction of management’s attention from our primary business;

● distraction of management’s attention from our primary business;

● substantial monetary awards to patients or other claimants;

2 unchanged sentences

● decreased demand for our products.

Although we have product

liability insurance that we believe is adequate, this insurance is subject to deductibles and coverage limitations, and we may

not be able to maintain this insurance.

Also, it is possible that claims could exceed the limits of our coverage or be excluded

from coverage under our policy, and may increase the cost of maintaining our coverage.

If we are unable to maintain product liability

insurance at an acceptable cost or on acceptable terms with adequate coverage or otherwise protect ourselves against potential

product liability claims, or if we underestimate the amount of insurance we need, we could be exposed to significant liabilities,

which may harm our business.

One or more product liability claims could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial

condition and results of operations.

the risk of warranty claims on our products.

We bear the risk of

warranty claims on our products.

We may not be successful in claiming recovery under any warranty or indemnity provided to us by

our suppliers or vendors in the event of a successful warranty claim against us by a customer, and any recovery from such supplier

or vendor may not be adequate.

Our product liability insurance is subject to deductibles and coverage limitations, and we may not be able to maintain this insurance.

It is also possible that claims could exceed the limits of, or be excluded from, coverage under our policy, and claims against us could also increase the cost of maintaining our coverage.

Our excess insurance carrier has recently asserted that claims related to the FiberCel litigation are not covered under our policy.

If these or other claims are excluded from our coverages, or if we are unable to maintain product liability insurance at an acceptable cost or on acceptable terms with adequate coverage or otherwise protect ourselves against potential product liability claims, or if we underestimate the amount of insurance we need, we could be exposed to significant liabilities, which may harm our business.

One or more product liability claims could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We bear the risk of warranty claims on our products.

We may not be successful in claiming recovery under any warranty or indemnity provided to us by our suppliers or vendors in the event of a successful warranty claim against us by a customer, and any recovery from such supplier or vendor may not be adequate.

Furthermore, we may not have any, or have an adequate, warranty provided by our supplier.

warranty claims brought by our customers related to third-party components may arise after our ability to bring corresponding warranty

claims against such suppliers expires, which could result in costs to us.

failures or quality issues associated with our products could lead to product recalls or safety alerts, adverse regulatory actions,

litigation, including product liability claims, and negative publicity, any of which may erode our competitive advantage and market

share and have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.

Quality is extremely

important to us and our customers due to the serious and costly consequences of product failure.

Quality and safety issues may

occur with respect to any of our products, and our future operating results will depend on our ability to maintain an effective

quality control system and effectively train and manage our workforce with respect to our quality system.

The development, manufacture

and control of our products are subject to extensive and rigorous regulation by numerous government agencies, including the FDA,

the Competent Authorities of the European Union and similar foreign agencies.

Compliance with these regulatory requirements, including

but not limited to the QSR, current Good Manufacturing Practices (“GMPs”) and adverse events/recall reporting requirements

in the United States and other applicable regulations worldwide, is subject to continual review and is monitored rigorously through

periodic inspections by the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities.

If we fail to comply with our reporting obligations, the FDA,

the Competent Authorities of the European Union or other regulatory authority could take action, including issuance of warning

letters and/or untitled letters, administrative actions, criminal prosecution, imposition of civil monetary penalties, revocation

of our device clearance, seizure of our products or delay in the clearance of future products.

The FDA and foreign

regulatory authorities may also require post-market testing and surveillance to monitor the performance of approved products.

facilities and those of our suppliers, commercial partners and independent sales agents are also subject to periodic regulatory

If the FDA or a foreign authority were to conclude that we have failed to comply with any of these requirements, it

could institute a wide variety of enforcement actions, ranging from a public warning letter to more severe sanctions, such as product

recalls or seizures, withdrawals, monetary penalties, consent decrees, injunctive actions to halt the manufacture or distribution

of products, import detentions of products made outside the United States, export restrictions, restrictions on operations or other

civil or criminal sanctions.

In addition, warranty claims brought by our customers related to third-party components may arise after our ability to bring corresponding warranty claims against such suppliers expires, which could result in costs to us.

In addition, we have been, and in the future could be, subject to costs related to product recalls, and we could incur significant costs to correct any defects, warranty claims or other problems.

Any such events could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Defects, failures or quality issues associated with our products could lead to product recalls or safety alerts, adverse regulatory actions, litigation, including product liability claims, and negative publicity, any of which may erode our competitive advantage and market share and have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.

Quality is extremely important to us and our customers due to the serious and costly consequences of product failure.

Quality and safety issues may occur with respect to any of our products, and our future operating results will depend on our ability to maintain an effective quality control system and effectively train and manage our workforce with respect to our quality system.

The development, manufacture and control of our products are subject to extensive and rigorous regulation by numerous government agencies, including the FDA, the competent authorities of the EU member states and similar foreign agencies.

Compliance with these regulatory requirements, including but not limited to the QSR, current Good Manufacturing Practices (“GMPs”) and adverse events/recall reporting requirements in the United States and other applicable regulations worldwide, is subject to continual review and is monitored rigorously through periodic inspections by the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities.

If we fail to comply with our reporting obligations, the FDA, the competent authorities of the EU member states or other regulatory authority could take action, including issuance of warning letters and/or untitled letters, administrative actions, criminal prosecution, imposition of civil monetary penalties, revocation of our device clearance, seizure of our products or delay in the clearance of future products.

The FDA and foreign regulatory authorities may also require post-market testing and surveillance to monitor the performance of approved or certified products.

Our facilities and those of our suppliers, commercial partners and

independent sales agents are also subject to periodic regulatory inspections.

If the FDA or a foreign authority were to conclude that we have failed to comply with any of these requirements, it could institute a wide variety of enforcement actions, ranging from a public warning letter to more severe sanctions, such as product recalls or seizures, withdrawals, monetary penalties, consent decrees, injunctive actions to halt the manufacture or distribution of products, import detentions of products made outside the United States, export restrictions, restrictions on operations or other civil or criminal sanctions.

Civil or criminal sanctions could be assessed against our officers, employees, or us.

regulatory action, depending on its magnitude, may restrict us from effectively manufacturing, marketing and selling our products.

If our products do

not function as designed, or are designed improperly, we or the third-party manufacturer of such products may withdraw such products

from the market, whether by choice or as a result of regulatory requirements.

In August 2019, we recalled and discarded certain

production lots of CanGaroo from the market due to suture breakage.

In January 2018, we recalled five of our allograft tissue implants

because a pre-sterilized donor culture should have been disqualified, each of which had a negative effect on our business, financial

condition and results of operations.

Any product recall we or a third-party manufacturer may conduct in the future, whether voluntary

or required, may have also negatively affect our business financial condition and results of operations, and this effect may be

In addition, we cannot

predict the results of future legislative activity or future court decisions, any of which could increase regulatory requirements,

subject us to government investigations or expose us to unexpected litigation.

Any regulatory action or litigation, regardless

of the merits, may result in substantial costs, divert management’s attention from other business concerns and place additional

restrictions on our sales or the use of our products.

In addition, negative publicity, including regarding a quality or safety

issue, could damage our reputation, reduce market acceptance of our products, cause us to lose customers and decrease demand for

our products.

Any actual or perceived quality issues may also result in issuances of physician’s advisories against our products

or cause us to conduct voluntary recalls.

Any product defects or problems, regulatory action, litigation, negative publicity or

recalls could disrupt our business and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our operating

results may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year due to the seasonality of our business, as well as

a variety of other factors, many of which are outside of our control.

Our quarterly and

annual results of operations may vary significantly in the future, and period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may

not be meaningful.

Accordingly, the results of any one quarter or other period should not be relied upon as an indication of our

future performance.

Our quarterly and annual financial results may fluctuate as a result of a variety of factors, many of which

are outside our control and, as a result, may not fully reflect the underlying performance of our business.

One such factor includes

seasonal variations in our sales.

We have experienced and may in the future experience higher sales in the fourth quarter as hospitals

in the United States increase their purchases of our products to coincide with the end of their budget cycles.

Satisfaction of

patient deductibles through the course of the year also results in increased sales later in the year.

In general, our first quarter

usually has lower sales than the preceding fourth quarter as patient deductibles are re-established with the new year, thereby

increasing their out-of-pocket costs.

Other factors that

may cause fluctuations in our quarterly and annual results include, among other things:

Any adverse regulatory action, depending on its magnitude, may restrict us from effectively manufacturing, marketing and selling our products.

If our products do not function as designed, or are designed improperly, we or the third-party manufacturer of such products may withdraw such products from the market, whether by choice or as a result of regulatory requirements.

In January 2018, we recalled five of our allograft tissue implants because a pre-sterilized donor culture should have been disqualified, each of which had a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In August 2019, we recalled and discarded certain production lots of CanGaroo from the market due to suture breakage.

Furthermore, in June 2021, we issued a voluntary recall pertaining to a single donor lot of our FiberCel Fiber Viable Bone Matrix, a bone repair product made from human tissue that is used in various orthopedic and spinal procedures, following our learning of post-surgical infections in patients treated with FiberCel, including some patients that tested positive for tuberculosis.

This recall had a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Any product recall we or a third-party manufacturer may conduct in the future, whether voluntary or required, may also negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and this effect may be material.

In addition, we cannot predict the results of future legislative activity or future court decisions, any of which could increase regulatory requirements, subject us to government investigations or expose us to unexpected litigation.

Any regulatory action or litigation, regardless of the merits, may result in substantial costs, divert management’s attention from other business concerns and place additional restrictions on our sales or the use of our products.

In addition, negative publicity, including regarding a quality or safety issue, could damage our reputation, reduce market acceptance of our products, cause us to lose customers and decrease demand for our products.

Any actual or perceived quality issues may also result in issuances of physician’s advisories against our products or cause us to conduct voluntary recalls.

Any product defects or problems, regulatory action, litigation, negative publicity or recalls could disrupt our business and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face significant litigation related to FiberCel.

We have been named in multiple lawsuits alleging that the plaintiffs contracted tuberculosis and are suffering substantial adverse symptoms following the implantation of FiberCel during spinal fusion operations.

See Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” and Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

We have incurred and will continue to incur costs to defend these lawsuits and are not currently able to estimate damage amounts, if any, that we may be required to pay in connection with these lawsuits.

Furthermore, these proceedings are still expected to continue for the reasonably foreseeable future, and we cannot predict the course the proceedings will take or their ultimate outcome.

Given the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of litigation and costs involved to defend against the claims, we are currently unable to reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss with respect to these lawsuits.

Any unfavorable outcome that results in the payment of substantial damages could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flow, results of operations, financial position and prospects.

Our operating results may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year due to the seasonality of our business, as well as a variety of other factors, many of which are outside of our control.

Our quarterly and annual results of operations may vary significantly in the future, and period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful.

Accordingly, the results of any one quarter or other period should not be relied upon as an indication of our future performance.

Our quarterly and annual financial results may fluctuate as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside our control and, as a result, may not fully reflect the underlying performance of our business.

One such factor includes seasonal variations in our sales.

We have experienced and may in the future experience higher sales in the fourth quarter as hospitals in the United States increase their purchases of our products to coincide with the end of their budget cycles.

Satisfaction of patient deductibles through the course of

the year also results in increased sales later in the year.

In general, our first quarter usually has lower sales than the preceding fourth quarter as patient deductibles are re-established with the new year, thereby increasing their out-of-pocket costs.

Other factors that may cause fluctuations in our quarterly and annual results include, among other things:

● the timing of medical procedures using our products;

● the announcement or introduction of new products by our competitors;

failure of government health benefit programs and private health plans to cover our products or

to timely and adequately reimburse the users of our products;

the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, or any other pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious

disease in the United States or worldwide that impacts the number of procedures being performed;

● failure of government health benefit programs and private health plans to cover our products or to timely and adequately reimburse the users of our products;

● the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, or any other pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease in the United States or worldwide that impacts the number of procedures being performed;

● the rate of reimbursement for procedures using our products by government and private insurers;

whether our products are granted pass-through reimbursement status or included in the “bundled”

reimbursement structure;

changes in purchasing patterns by our commercial partners or customers, or the loss of any significant

customer or group of customers;

● whether our products are granted pass-through reimbursement status or included in the “bundled” reimbursement structure;

● changes in purchasing patterns by our commercial partners or customers, or the loss of any significant customer or group of customers;

● our ability to upgrade and develop our systems and infrastructure to accommodate growth;

the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to the expansion of

our business, operations and infrastructure;

● the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to the expansion of our business, operations and infrastructure;

● changes in, or enactment of, new laws or regulations promulgated by federal, state or local governments;

● changes in our supply or manufacturing costs;

cost containment initiatives or policies developed by government and commercial payors that create

financial incentives not to use our products;

● cost containment initiatives or policies developed by government and commercial payors that create financial incentives not to use our products;

● our inability to demonstrate that our products are cost-effective or superior to competing products;

2 unchanged sentences

● discovery of product defects during the manufacturing process;

initiation of a government investigation into potential non-compliance with laws or regulations,

or the initiation of a voluntary or involuntary recall with respect to one or more of our products;

● initiation of a government investigation into potential non-compliance with laws or regulations, or the initiation of a voluntary or involuntary recall with respect to one or more of our products;

● sanctions imposed by federal or state governments due to non-compliance with laws or regulations;

● general economic conditions as well as economic conditions specific to the healthcare industry.

We have based our

current and future expense levels largely on our investment plans and estimates of future events, although certain of our expense

levels are, to a large extent, fixed.

We may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected revenue

Accordingly, any significant shortfall in sales relative to our planned expenditures would have an immediate adverse

effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Further, as a strategic response to changes in the competitive

environment or to changes in laws and regulations, we may from time to time make certain pricing, service or marketing decisions

(e.g., reduce prices) that could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have based our current and future expense levels largely on our investment plans and estimates of future events, although certain of our expense levels are, to a large extent, fixed.

We may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall.

Accordingly, any significant shortfall in sales relative to our planned expenditures would have an immediate adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Further, as a strategic response to changes in the competitive environment or to changes in laws and regulations, we may from time to time make certain pricing, service or marketing decisions (e.g., reduce prices) that could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Due to the foregoing factors, our revenue and operating results are and will remain difficult to forecast.

Our indebtedness

and our Revenue Interest Obligation to Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated may limit our flexibility in operating our business

and adversely affect our financial health and competitive position.

As of December 31,

2020, we had $30.6 million of indebtedness outstanding, consisting of $19.7 million outstanding under our Term Loan Facility

(as defined under Part II, Item 7.

“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Liquidity and Capital Resources —

Credit Facilities”) (net of $0.3 million of unamortized discount and

deferred financing costs), $6.5 million outstanding under our Revolving Credit Facility (as defined under Part II, Item 7.

“Management’s

Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations —

Liquidity and Capital Resources —

Facilities”) (with $1.5 million of additional borrowings available thereunder), $3.0 million outstanding pursuant to a promissory

note under the Paycheck Protection Program of the CARES Act (the “PPP Loan”), and a $1.4 million promissory note payable

to one of our suppliers.

In addition, we are party to a royalty agreement with Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (“Ligand”)

pursuant to which we assumed a restructured, long-term obligation to Ligand (the “Revenue Interest Obligation”), that

requires us to pay Ligand 5.0% of future sales of the products we acquired from CorMatrix (as well as products substantially similar

to those products), subject to annual minimum payments of $2.75 million and certain milestone payments if sales of the acquired

products exceed certain thresholds.

Our indebtedness and our Revenue Interest Obligation to Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated may limit our flexibility in operating our business and adversely affect our financial health and competitive position.

As of December 31, 2021, we had $23.3 million of indebtedness outstanding, consisting of $17.1 million outstanding under our Term Loan Facility (as defined under Part II, Item 7.

“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Credit Facilities”) (net of $0.1 million of unamortized deferred financing costs), $4.8 million outstanding under our Revolving Credit Facility (as defined under Part II, Item 7.

“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Credit Facilities”) (with $2.1 million of additional borrowings available thereunder), and a $1.4 million promissory note payable to one of our suppliers.

In addition, we are party to a royalty agreement with Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (“Ligand”) pursuant to which we assumed a restructured, long-term obligation to Ligand (the “Revenue Interest Obligation”), that requires us to pay Ligand 5.0% of future sales of the products we acquired from CorMatrix (as well as products substantially similar to those products), subject to annual minimum payments of $2.75 million and certain milestone payments if sales of the acquired products exceed certain thresholds.

See Part II, Item 7.

“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition

and Results of Operations —

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgment and Estimates —

Interest Obligation.”

In order to service

this indebtedness and our Revenue Interest Obligation, and any additional indebtedness or other long-term obligations we may incur

in the future, we need to generate sufficient levels of cash from our operating activities.

Our ability to generate cash is subject,

in part, to our ability to successfully execute our business strategy, as well as general economic, financial, competitive, regulatory

and other factors beyond our control.

We cannot assure you that our business will be able to generate sufficient levels of cash

from operations or that future borrowings or other financings will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to service

our indebtedness, satisfy our obligations under the Revenue Interest Obligation and fund our other liquidity needs.

To the extent

we are required to use cash from operations or the proceeds of any future financing to service our indebtedness and satisfy our

obligations under the Revenue Interest Obligation instead of funding working capital, capital expenditures or other general corporate

purposes, we will be less able to plan for, or react to, changes in our business, industry and in the economy generally.

place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less indebtedness.

In addition, the agreements

governing our Term Loan Facility and Revolving Credit Facility contain, and any agreements evidencing or governing other future

indebtedness may also contain, certain covenants that limit our ability to engage in certain transactions that may be in our long-term

best interests.

“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgment and Estimates — Revenue Interest Obligation.”

In order to service this indebtedness and our Revenue Interest Obligation, and any additional indebtedness or other long-term obligations we may incur in the future, we need to generate sufficient levels of cash from our operating activities.

Our ability to generate cash is subject, in part, to our ability to successfully execute our business strategy, as well as general economic, financial, competitive, regulatory and other factors beyond our control.

We cannot assure you that our business will be able to generate sufficient levels of cash from operations or that future borrowings or other financings will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to service our indebtedness, satisfy our obligations under the Revenue Interest Obligation and fund our other liquidity needs.

To the extent we are required to use cash from operations or the proceeds of any future financing to service our indebtedness and satisfy our obligations under the Revenue Interest Obligation instead of funding working capital, capital expenditures or other general corporate purposes, we will be less able to plan for, or react to, changes in our business, industry and in the economy generally.

This will place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less indebtedness.

In addition, the agreements governing our Term Loan Facility and Revolving Credit Facility contain, and any agreements evidencing or governing other future indebtedness may also contain, certain covenants that limit our ability to engage in certain transactions that may be in our long-term best interests.

Subject to certain limited exceptions, these covenants limit our ability to, among other things:

2 unchanged sentences

● pay dividends or make other distributions on equity interests;

enter into agreements restricting their subsidiaries’

ability to pay dividends;

● enter into agreements restricting their subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends;

● redeem, repurchase or refinance subordinated indebtedness;

6 unchanged sentences

● enter into sale and leaseback transactions.

In addition to these

covenants, the agreements governing our Term Loan Facility and Revolving Credit Facility also contain a financial covenant, which

is tested on a monthly basis, and requires us to achieve a specified minimum net product revenue (as defined therein) for the preceding

12-month period.

While we were in compliance with all covenants under these agreements as of December 31, 2020, we have had past

breaches requiring waivers and there can be no guarantee that we will not breach these covenants in the future.

Our ability to

comply with these covenants may be affected by events and factors beyond our control.

In the event that we breach one or more covenants,

our lenders may choose to declare an event of default and require that we immediately repay all amounts outstanding, terminate

any commitment to extend further credit and foreclose on the collateral granted to them to collateralize such indebtedness.

occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, we may

be able to incur significant additional indebtedness in the future.

Although the agreements governing our Term Loan Facility and

Revolving Credit Facility contain restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness by us, such restrictions are subject

to a number of qualifications and exceptions, and the indebtedness incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial.

In addition to these covenants, the agreements governing our Term Loan Facility and Revolving Credit Facility also contain a financial covenant, which is tested on a monthly basis, and requires us to achieve a specified minimum net product revenue (as defined therein) for the preceding 12-month period.

While we were in compliance with all covenants under these agreements as of December 31, 2021, we have had past breaches requiring waivers and there can be no guarantee that we will not breach these covenants in the future.

To this end, the mutual termination of our Supply Agreement for FiberCel with Medtronic referred to in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report would have triggered an event of default;

however, such event of default was waived by our lenders.

Furthermore, the Supply Agreement’s termination may negatively affect future revenues and as such, our ability to comply with the revenue covenants in the future is uncertain.

Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events and factors beyond our control.

In the event that we breach one or more covenants, our lenders may choose to declare an event of default and require that we immediately repay all amounts outstanding, terminate any commitment to extend further credit and foreclose on the collateral granted to them to collateralize such indebtedness.

The occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, we may be able to incur significant additional indebtedness in the future.

Although the agreements governing our Term Loan Facility and Revolving Credit Facility contain restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness by us, such restrictions are subject to a number of qualifications and exceptions, and the indebtedness incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial.

Also, these restrictions do not prohibit us from incurring obligations that do not constitute indebtedness as defined therein.

To the extent that we incur additional indebtedness or such other obligations, the risks associated with our substantial indebtedness

described above will increase.

unable to obtain forgiveness of the PPP Loan, in whole or in part, in accordance with the provisions of the CARES Act, which could

adversely affect our financial condition.

In May 2020, we entered

into a promissory note with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) under the Paycheck Protection Program of the CARES Act pursuant

to which SVB agreed to make a loan to us in the amount of approximately $3.0 million.

The PPP Loan matures in May 2022, bears interest

at a rate of 1.0% per annum and requires no payments during the first ten months from the date of the loan.

The PPP Loan is unsecured

and guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (the “SBA”).

Under the terms of the PPP Loan, the principal amount

of the loan may be forgiven to the extent it is used for qualifying expenses as described in the CARES Act and we otherwise request

forgiveness in accordance with the terms of the PPP Loan and the requirements of the SBA.

While we expect to request that a significant

portion of the principal amount of the PPP Loan be forgiven and to comply with all corresponding requirements, we cannot guarantee

that we will be successful in obtaining forgiveness of all or any part of such principal amount.

We will be required to repay any

principal amount of the PPP Loan that is not forgiven, together with accrued and unpaid interest, in equal monthly installments

prior to the maturity date of the loan, which would further restrict our operating and financial flexibility.

capital needs are uncertain and we may need to raise funds in the future, and such funds may not be available on acceptable terms

We believe that the

net proceeds from our IPO, together with our existing cash, availability under our Revolving Credit Facility and cash generated

from expected future commercial sales, will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements through

However, we have based these estimates on assumptions that may prove to be incorrect, and we could spend our available financial

resources much faster than we currently expect.

Any future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including, among other

To the extent that we incur additional indebtedness or such other obligations, the risks associated with our substantial indebtedness described above will increase.

Various events permit the lender under the Term Loan Facility and Revolving Credit Facility to terminate the agreement, following a cure period.

Such events include, without limitation, legal proceedings which could be implicated based on the facts involving the FiberCel Recall and the related litigation.

If the lender were to terminate either the Term Loan Facility or the Revolving Credit Facility, the lender may declare all or any portion of these obligations to become immediately due and payable.

Our future capital needs are uncertain and we may need to raise funds in the future, and such funds may not be available on acceptable terms or at all.

Our future capital needs are uncertain and, as such, we may seek to raise additional capital through equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations or licensing arrangements.

Any future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including, among other things:

● continued patient, physician and market acceptance of our products;

the scope, rate of progress and cost of our current and future pre-clinical studies and clinical

the cost of our research and development activities and the cost of commercializing new products

or technologies;

● the scope, rate of progress and cost of our current and future pre-clinical and clinical studies;

● the cost of our research and development activities and the cost of commercializing new products or technologies;

● the cost and timing of expanding our sales and marketing capabilities;

the cost of filing and prosecuting patent applications and maintaining, defending and enforcing

our patent or other intellectual property rights;

the cost of defending, in litigation or otherwise, any claims that we infringe, misappropriate

or otherwise violate third-party patents or other intellectual property rights;

the cost and timing of additional regulatory approvals;

costs associated with any product recall that may occur;

● the cost of filing and prosecuting patent applications and maintaining, defending and enforcing our patent or other intellectual property rights;

● the cost of defending, in litigation or otherwise, any claims that we infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate third-party patents or other intellectual property rights;

● the costs of defending against or damages payable (to the extent above the applicable insurance coverage), for example, in connection with claims involving the FiberCel Recall;

● the cost and timing of additional regulatory approvals or certifications;

● costs associated with any product recall;

● the effect of competing technological and market developments;

1 unchanged sentence

● the costs of developing and commercializing new products or technologies;

the extent to which we acquire or invest in products, technologies and businesses, although we

currently have no commitments or agreements relating to any of these types of transactions;

● the extent to which we acquire or invest in products, technologies and businesses, although we currently have no commitments or agreements relating to any of these types of transactions;

● the costs of operating as a public company;

● unanticipated general, legal and administrative expenses;

the effects on any of the above of the current COVID-19 pandemic or any other pandemic, epidemic

or outbreak of infectious disease.

In addition, our operating

plan may change as a result of any number of factors, including those set forth above and other factors currently unknown to us,

and we may need additional funds sooner than anticipated.

Any additional equity or debt financing that we raise may contain terms

that are not favorable to us or our stockholders.

If we raise additional funds by selling additional shares of our common stock

or other securities convertible (directly or indirectly) into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of our common stock, the

issuance of such securities will result in dilution to our stockholders.

The price per share at which we sell additional shares

of our common stock, or securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of our common stock, in future transactions

may be higher or lower than the price per share paid by you.

Furthermore, investors purchasing any securities we may issue in the

future may have rights superior to your rights as a holder of our common stock.

In addition, any future

debt financing into which we enter may impose upon us covenants that restrict our operations, including limitations on our ability

to incur liens or additional debt, pay dividends, repurchase our common stock, make certain investments and engage in certain merger,

consolidation or asset sale transactions.

If we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements with third

parties, it may be necessary to relinquish some rights to our technologies or our products, or grant licenses on terms that are

not favorable to us.

Furthermore, we cannot

be certain that additional funding will be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all.

If we do not have, or are not able to

obtain, sufficient funds, we may have to delay development or commercialization of our products or license to third parties the

rights to commercialize products or technologies that we would otherwise seek to commercialize.

We also may have to reduce marketing,

customer support or other resources devoted to our products or cease operations.

Any of these factors could harm our business,

financial condition and results of operations.

breaches, loss of or damage to data, system failures and other disruptions could compromise sensitive information related to our

business or our customers’

patients, or prevent us from accessing critical information and expose us to liability, which

could adversely affect our business and our reputation.

In the ordinary course

of our business, we may become exposed to, or collect and store, sensitive data, including procedure-based information and legally

protected health information, credit card, and other financial information, insurance information and other potentially personally

identifiable information.

● the effects on any of the above of the current COVID-19 pandemic or any other pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of infectious disease.

In addition, our operating plan may change as a result of any number of factors, including those set forth above and other factors currently unknown to us, and we may need additional funds sooner than anticipated.

Any additional equity or debt financing that we raise may contain terms that are not favorable to us or our stockholders.

If we raise additional funds by selling additional shares of our common stock or other securities convertible (directly or indirectly) into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of our common stock, the issuance of such securities will result in dilution to our stockholders.

The price per share at which we sell additional shares of our common stock, or securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of our common stock, in future transactions may be higher or lower than the price per share paid by you.

Furthermore, investors purchasing any securities we may issue in the future may have rights superior to your rights as a holder of our common stock.

In addition, any future debt financing into which we enter may impose upon us covenants that restrict our operations, including limitations on our ability to incur liens or additional debt, pay dividends, repurchase our common stock, make certain investments and engage in certain merger, consolidation or asset sale transactions.

If we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements with third parties, it may be necessary to relinquish some rights to our technologies or our products, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us.

Furthermore, we cannot be certain that additional funding will be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all.

If we do not have, or are not able to obtain, sufficient funds, we may have to delay development or commercialization of our products or license to third parties the rights to commercialize products or technologies that we would otherwise seek to

commercialize.

We also may have to reduce marketing, customer support or other resources devoted to our products or cease operations.

Any of these factors could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Security breaches, loss of or damage to data, system failures and other disruptions could compromise sensitive information related to our business or our customers’ patients, or prevent us from accessing critical information and expose us to liability, which could adversely affect our business and our reputation.

In the ordinary course of our business, we may become exposed to, or collect and store, sensitive data, including procedure-based information and legally protected health information, credit card, and other financial information, insurance information and other potentially personally identifiable information.

We also store sensitive intellectual property and other proprietary business information.

of any precautions we may take, our information technology (“IT”) and infrastructure, and that of our technology partners

and providers, may be vulnerable to cyberattacks by hackers or viruses or breaches due to employee error, malfeasance or other

We rely extensively on IT systems, networks and services, including internet sites, data hosting and processing facilities

and tools, physical security systems and other hardware, software and technical applications and platforms, some of which are managed,

hosted, provided and/or used by third parties or their vendors, to assist in conducting our business.

A significant breakdown,

invasion, corruption, destruction or interruption of critical information technology systems or infrastructure, by our workforce,

others with authorized access to our systems or unauthorized persons could negatively impact operations.

The ever-increasing use

and evolution of technology, including cloud-based computing, creates opportunities for the unintentional dissemination or intentional

destruction of confidential information stored in our or our third-party providers’

systems, portable media or storage devices.

We could also experience a business interruption, theft of confidential information or reputational damage from industrial espionage

attacks, malware or other cyber-attacks, which may compromise our system infrastructure or lead to data leakage, either internally

or at our third-party providers.

Unauthorized disclosure

of sensitive or confidential patient or employee data, including personally identifiable information, whether through breach of

computer systems, systems failure, employee negligence, fraud or misappropriation, or otherwise, or unauthorized access to or through

our information systems and networks, whether by our employees or third parties, could result in negative publicity, legal liability

and damage to our reputation.

Unauthorized disclosure of personally identifiable information could also expose us to sanctions

for violations of data privacy laws and regulations around the world.

Although we have general liability and cybersecurity insurance

coverage, our insurance may not cover all claims, continue to be available to us on reasonable terms or be sufficient in amount

to cover one or more large claims;

Regardless of any precautions we may take, our information technology (“IT”) and infrastructure, and that of our technology partners and providers, may be vulnerable to cyberattacks by hackers or viruses or breaches due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions.

We rely extensively on IT systems, networks and services, including internet sites, data hosting and processing facilities and tools, physical security systems and other hardware, software and technical applications and platforms, some of which are managed, hosted, provided and/or used by third parties or their vendors, to assist in conducting our business.

A significant breakdown, invasion, corruption, destruction or interruption of critical information technology systems or infrastructure, by our workforce, others with authorized access to our systems or unauthorized persons could negatively impact operations.

The ever-increasing use and evolution of technology, including cloud-based computing, creates opportunities for the unintentional dissemination or intentional destruction of confidential information stored in our or our third-party providers’ systems, portable media or storage devices.

We could also experience a business interruption, theft of confidential information or reputational damage from industrial espionage attacks, malware or other cyber-attacks, which may compromise our system infrastructure or lead to data leakage, either internally or at our third-party providers.

Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential patient or employee data, including personally identifiable information, whether through breach of computer systems, systems failure, employee negligence, fraud or misappropriation, or otherwise, or unauthorized access to or through our information systems and networks, whether by our employees or third parties, could result in negative publicity, legal liability and damage to our reputation.

Unauthorized disclosure of personally identifiable information could also expose us to sanctions for violations of data privacy laws and regulations around the world.

Although we have general liability and cybersecurity insurance coverage, our insurance may not cover all claims, continue to be available to us on reasonable terms or be sufficient in amount to cover one or more large claims;

additionally, the insurer may disclaim coverage as to any claim.

The successful assertion of

one or more large claims against us that exceed or are not covered by our insurance coverage or changes in our insurance policies,

including premium increases or the imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements, could have a material adverse effect

on our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition.

Despite our security

measures, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent breakdowns or breaches to our or our third-party providers’

databases or systems, or any resulting unauthorized access to, or disclosure and use of, non-public or other legally protected

Phishing, social engineering and other attacks upon IT systems are increasing in their frequency, levels of persistence,

sophistication and intensity, and are being conducted by sophisticated and organized groups and individuals with a wide range of

motives and expertise.

In addition to unauthorized access to or acquisition of personal information, confidential information,

intellectual property or other sensitive information, such attacks could include the deployment of harmful malware and ransomware,

and may use a variety of methods, including denial-of-service attacks, social engineering and other means, to attain such unauthorized

access or acquisition or otherwise affect service reliability and threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information.

Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and

often are not foreseeable or recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to

implement adequate preventative measures.

Any such breakdowns or breaches, or resulting access, disclosure, or other loss of information,

could significantly disrupt our business and result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy

of personal information, and damage to our reputation, any of which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial

condition and results of operations.

depends on our ability to retain and motivate key management personnel and other employees and consultants, to attract, retain

and motivate additional qualified personnel and to effectively navigate changes in our senior management team.

Our success depends

to a significant extent on our ability to attract, retain and motivate key management personnel and other employees and consultants

for our business, including scientific, technical and sales and marketing personnel.

There is currently a shortage of skilled executives

and other personnel in our industry, which is likely to continue.

As a result, competition for skilled personnel is intense and

the turnover rate can be high.

We may not be able to attract and retain personnel on acceptable terms, given the competition among

numerous regenerative medicine and other healthcare companies, for individuals with similar skill sets.

Many of the companies that

we compete against for qualified personnel have substantially greater financial and other resources and different risk profiles

The successful assertion of one or more large claims against us that exceed or are not covered by our insurance coverage or changes in our insurance policies, including premium increases or the imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements, could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition.

Despite our security measures, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent breakdowns or breaches to our or our third-party providers’ databases or systems, or any resulting unauthorized access to, or disclosure and use of, non-public or other legally protected information.

Phishing, social engineering and other attacks upon IT systems are increasing in their frequency, levels of persistence, sophistication and intensity, and are being conducted by sophisticated and organized groups and individuals with a wide range of motives and expertise.

In addition to unauthorized access to or acquisition of personal information, confidential information, intellectual property or other sensitive information, such attacks could include the deployment of harmful malware and ransomware, and may use a variety of methods, including denial-of-service attacks, social engineering and other means, to attain such unauthorized access or acquisition or otherwise affect service reliability and threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information.

Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and often are not foreseeable or recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures.

Any such breakdowns or breaches, or resulting access, disclosure, or other loss of information, could significantly disrupt our business and result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, and damage to our reputation, any of which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our success depends on our ability to retain and motivate key management personnel and other employees and consultants, to attract, retain and motivate additional qualified personnel and to effectively navigate changes in our senior management team.

Our success depends to a significant extent on our ability to attract, retain and motivate key management personnel and other employees and consultants for our business, including scientific, technical and sales and marketing personnel.

There is currently a shortage of skilled executives and other personnel in our industry, which is likely to continue.

As a result, competition for skilled personnel is intense and the turnover rate can be high.

We may not be able to attract and retain personnel on acceptable terms, given the competition among numerous regenerative medicine and other healthcare companies, for individuals with similar skill sets.

Many of the companies that we compete against for qualified personnel have substantially greater financial and other resources and different risk profiles than we do.

They may also provide more diverse opportunities, better chances for career advancement and/or more attractive compensation.

Some of these characteristics may be more appealing to high quality candidates than what we can offer.

Furthermore, in order to

offer attractive compensation, we may need to increase the level of cash compensation that we pay to them, which will reduce funds

available for research and development and support of our commercialization and sales growth objectives.

There can be no assurance

that we will have sufficient cash available to offer our employees and consultants attractive compensation or that we will realize

any corresponding benefits from the payment of such compensation.

We are also vulnerable to the risk that these individuals may

take actions, either within or outside the scope of their duties, that intentionally or unintentionally tarnish our brand and reputation

or otherwise adversely affect our business.

We also cannot prevent our senior management team from terminating their employment

Losing the services of any member of our senior management team could materially harm our business until a suitable replacement

is found, and such replacement may not have equal experience and capabilities.

In addition, we do not maintain “key person”

insurance policies on the lives of any of our management team or other employees.

The inability to recruit or a loss of the services

of any executive, key employee or consultant may impede the progress of our research, development, commercialization and sales

growth objectives, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and our

ability to grow our business.

In addition, we have

recently added a new Chief Financial Officer, Chief Commercial Officer and Chief Medical Officer.

These changes, and any other

changes to our senior management team we experience in the future, subject us to a number of additional risks, including risks

pertaining to the coordination of responsibilities and tasks, the creation of new management systems and processes, differences

in management style, effects on corporate culture and the need for transfer of historical knowledge.

If our management team does

not work together harmoniously, efficiently allocate responsibilities between themselves and implement and abide by effective controls,

our operations will be adversely affected.

into foreign markets expose us to risks associated with international sales and operations.

Though we have historically

focused our market development and commercial activities primarily in the United States, we have obtained marketing registrations,

developed commercial and distribution capabilities and are currently selling CanGaroo and our cardiovascular products in several

countries outside the United States primarily through independent sales agents.

Our international sales subject us to additional

risks as compared to those we face in the United States.

The sale and shipment

of our products across international borders subject us to extensive U.S.

and foreign governmental trade, import and export and

customs regulations and laws, including but not limited to, the Export Administration Regulations and trade sanctions against embargoed

countries, which are administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control within the Department of the Treasury (“OFAC”)

as well as the laws and regulations administered by the Department of Commerce.

These regulations limit our ability to market,

sell, distribute or otherwise transfer our products or technology to prohibited countries or persons.

Compliance with these

regulations and laws is costly, and failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations could adversely affect us

in a variety of ways that include, but are not limited to, significant criminal, civil and administrative penalties, including

imprisonment of individuals, monetary fines, denial of export privileges, seizure of shipments and restrictions on certain business

The failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations could also result in the disruption of our distribution

and sales activities.

These risks may limit

or disrupt our sales and commercialization efforts outside the United States, restrict the movement of funds or result in the deprivation

of contractual rights or the taking of property by nationalization or expropriation without fair compensation.

Operating in international

markets also requires significant management attention and financial support, and, as a result, will divert these resources away

from our other operations.

We are subject

to anti-bribery, anti-corruption and anti-money laundering laws, including the U.S.

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, as well as export

control laws, customs laws, sanctions laws and other laws governing our operations.

If we fail to comply with these laws, we could

be subject to civil or criminal penalties, other remedial measures and legal expenses, any of which would adversely affect our

business, financial condition and results of operations.

We currently are and,

as we increase our international presence and global sales, will increasingly be, exposed to trade and economic sanctions and other

restrictions imposed by the United States, the European Union and other governments and organizations.

Departments of

Justice, Commerce, State and Treasury and other federal agencies and authorities have a broad range of civil and criminal penalties

they may seek to impose against corporations and individuals for violations of economic sanctions laws, export control laws, the

FCPA, and other federal statutes and regulations, including those established by OFAC.

Furthermore, in order to offer attractive compensation, we may need to increase the level of cash compensation that we pay to them, which will reduce funds available for research and development and support of our commercialization and sales growth objectives.

There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient cash available to offer our employees and consultants attractive compensation or that we will realize any corresponding benefits from the payment of such compensation.

We are also vulnerable to the risk that these individuals may take actions, either within or outside the scope of their duties, that intentionally or unintentionally tarnish our brand and reputation or otherwise adversely affect our business.

We also cannot prevent our senior management team from terminating their employment with us.

Losing the services of any member of our senior management team could materially harm our business until a suitable replacement is found, and such replacement may not have equal experience and capabilities.

In addition, we do not maintain “key person” insurance policies on the lives of any of our management team or other employees.

The inability to recruit or a loss of the services of any executive, key employee or consultant may impede the progress of our research, development, commercialization and sales growth objectives, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to grow our business.

In addition, we have recently added a new General Counsel.

This change, and any other changes to our senior management team we experience in the future, subject us to a number of additional risks, including risks pertaining to the coordination of responsibilities and tasks, the creation of new management systems and processes, differences in management style, effects on corporate culture and the need for transfer of historical knowledge.

If our management team does not work together harmoniously, efficiently allocate responsibilities between themselves and implement and abide by effective controls, our operations will be adversely affected.

Our sales into foreign markets expose us to risks associated with international sales and operations.

Though we have historically focused our market development and commercial activities primarily in the United States, we have obtained marketing registrations, developed commercial and distribution capabilities and are currently selling CanGaroo and our cardiovascular products in several countries outside the United States primarily through independent sales agents.

Our international sales subject us to additional risks as compared to those we face in the United States.

The sale and shipment of our products across international borders subject us to extensive U.S.

and foreign governmental trade, import and export and customs regulations and laws, including but not limited to, the Export Administration Regulations and trade sanctions against embargoed countries, which are administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control within the Department of the Treasury (“OFAC”) as well as the laws and regulations administered by the Department of Commerce.

These regulations limit our ability to market, sell, distribute or otherwise transfer our products or technology to prohibited countries or persons.

Compliance with these regulations and laws is costly, and failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations could adversely affect us in a variety of ways that include, but are not limited to, significant criminal, civil and administrative penalties, including imprisonment of individuals, monetary fines, denial of export privileges, seizure of shipments and restrictions on certain business activities.

The failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations could also result in the disruption of our distribution and sales activities.

These risks may limit or disrupt our sales and commercialization efforts outside the United States, restrict the movement of funds or result in the deprivation of contractual rights or the taking of property by nationalization or expropriation without fair compensation.

Operating in international markets also requires significant management attention and financial support, and, as a result, will divert these resources away from our other operations.

We are subject to anti-bribery, anti-corruption and anti-money laundering laws, including the U.S.

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, as well as export control laws, customs laws, sanctions laws and other laws governing our operations.

If we fail to comply with these laws, we could be subject to civil or criminal penalties, other remedial measures and legal expenses, any of which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We currently are and, as we increase our international presence and global sales, will increasingly be, exposed to trade and economic sanctions and other restrictions imposed by the United States, the EU and other governments and organizations.

Departments of Justice, Commerce, State and Treasury and other federal agencies and authorities have a broad range of civil and criminal penalties they may seek to impose against corporations and individuals for violations of economic sanctions laws, export control laws, the FCPA, and other federal statutes and regulations, including those established by OFAC.

In addition, the U.K.

Bribery Act of 2010

(the “Bribery Act”) prohibits both domestic and international bribery, as well as bribery across both private and public

An organization that “fails to prevent bribery”

by anyone associated with the organization can be charged

under the Bribery Act unless the organization can establish the defense of having implemented “adequate procedures”

to prevent bribery.

Under these laws and regulations, as well as other anti-corruption laws, anti-money laundering laws, export

control laws, customs laws, sanctions laws and other laws governing our operations, various government agencies may require export

licenses, may seek to impose modifications to business practices, including cessation of business activities in sanctioned countries

or with sanctioned persons or entities and modifications to compliance programs, which may increase compliance costs, and may subject

us to fines, penalties and other sanctions.

A violation of these laws or regulations would negatively affect our business, financial

condition and results of operations.

As our international

operations increase, we expect to implement policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance by us and our directors, officers,

employees, representatives, consultants and agents with the FCPA, OFAC restrictions, the Bribery Act and other export control,

anti-corruption, anti-money-laundering and anti-terrorism laws and regulations.

We cannot assure you, however, that any such policies

and procedures will be sufficient or that directors, officers, employees, representatives, consultants and agents have not engaged,

and will not engage, in conduct for which we may be held responsible, nor can we assure you that our business partners have not

engaged, and will not engage, in conduct that could materially affect their ability to perform their contractual obligations to

us or result in our being held liable for such conduct.

Violations of the FCPA, OFAC restrictions, the Bribery Act or other export

control, anti-corruption, anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism laws or regulations may result in severe criminal or civil sanctions,

and we may be subject to other liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and

results of operations.

Our officers,

employees, independent contractors, principal investigators, consultants, commercial partners and independent sales agents may

engage in misconduct or activities that are improper under other laws and regulations, which would create liability for us.

We are exposed to

the risk that our officers, employees, independent contractors (including contract research organizations (“CROs”)),

principal investigators, consultants, commercial partners and independent sales agents may engage in fraudulent conduct or other

illegal activity and/or may fail to disclose unauthorized activities to us.

Misconduct by these parties could include, but is not

limited to, intentional, reckless and/or negligent failures to comply with the laws and regulations of the FDA and its foreign

counterparts, including, but not limited to, those relating to the manufacture, processing, packing, holding, investigating or

distributing in commerce of medical devices, biological products and/or HCT/Ps, requiring the reporting of true, complete and accurate

information to such regulatory bodies (including any safety problems associated with the use of our products), and relating to

the conduct of clinical trials and the protection of human research subject.

In particular, companies

involved in the manufacture of medical products are subject to laws and regulations intended to ensure that medical products that

will be used in patients are safe and effective, and specifically that they are not adulterated or contaminated, that they are

properly labeled, and have the identity, strength, quality and purity that which they are represented to possess.

Further, companies

involved in the research and development of medical products are subject to extensive laws and regulations intended to protect

research subjects and ensure the integrity of data generated from clinical trials and of the regulatory review process.

Any misconduct

in any of these areas, whether by our own employees or by contractors, vendors, business associates, consultants or other entities

acting as our agents, could result in regulatory sanctions, criminal or civil liability and serious harm to our reputation.

is not always possible to identify and deter misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not

be effective in preventing such conduct, mitigating risks, or reducing the chance of governmental investigations or other actions

or lawsuits stemming from a failure to comply with these laws or regulations.

If any such investigations or other actions or lawsuits

are instituted against us, those actions could have a significant impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations,

including, without limitation, the imposition of significant fines and other sanctions that may materially impair our ability to

run a profitable business.

Even if we are successful in defending against the imposition of any such fines or other sanctions,

we could be required to incur substantial legal fees and other costs, and management’s attention will be diverted from our

core business operations, either of which would negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

to use certain tax attributes to offset future income tax liabilities may be subject to limitations.

We have net operating

losses and other tax attributes, including net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) for federal income tax purposes

of approximately $44.4 million and state NOLs of approximately $11.8 million as of December 31, 2020.

If not utilized, $17.7 million

of our NOLs will begin to expire for federal income tax purposes beginning in 2036, and our state NOLs will expire beginning in

Our ability to utilize our federal NOLs will depend on our future income, and there is a risk that our NOLs could expire

unused and be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities, which could adversely affect our operating results.

In addition, our ability

to utilize our NOLs may be subject to an annual limitation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

In general, under Sections 382 and 383 of the Code, a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change”

is subject to

limitations on its ability to utilize its pre-change NOLs or tax credits to offset future taxable income.

If we undergo an ownership

change or have previously undergone an ownership change, our ability to utilize federal NOLs or tax credits could be limited by

Sections 382 and 383 of the Code.

Additionally, future changes in our stock ownership, many of which are outside of our control,

could result in an ownership change under Sections 382 and 383 of the Code.

Our state NOLs or credits may also be impaired under

state tax law.

Bribery Act of 2010 (the “Bribery Act”) prohibits both domestic and international bribery, as well as bribery across both private and public sectors.

An organization that “fails to prevent bribery” by anyone associated with the organization can be charged under the Bribery Act unless the organization can establish the defense of having implemented “adequate procedures” to prevent bribery.

Under these laws and regulations, as well as other anti-corruption laws, anti-money laundering laws, export control laws, customs laws, sanctions laws and other laws governing our operations, various government agencies may require export licenses, may seek to impose modifications to business practices, including cessation of business activities in sanctioned countries or with sanctioned persons or entities and modifications to compliance programs, which may increase compliance costs, and may subject us to fines, penalties and other sanctions.

A violation of these laws or regulations would negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As our international operations increase, we expect to implement policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance by us and our directors, officers, employees, representatives, consultants and agents with the FCPA, OFAC restrictions, the Bribery Act and other export control, anti-corruption, anti-money-laundering and anti-terrorism laws and regulations.

We cannot assure you, however, that any such policies and procedures will be sufficient or that directors, officers, employees, representatives, consultants and agents have not engaged, and will not engage, in conduct for which we may be held responsible, nor can we assure you that our business partners have not engaged, and will not engage, in conduct that could materially affect their ability to perform their contractual obligations to us or result in our being held liable for such conduct.

Violations of the FCPA, OFAC restrictions, the Bribery Act or other export control, anti-corruption, anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism laws or regulations may result in severe criminal or civil sanctions, and we may be subject to other liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our officers, employees, independent contractors, principal investigators, consultants, commercial partners and independent sales agents may engage in misconduct or activities that are improper under other laws and regulations, which would create liability for us.

We are exposed to the risk that our officers, employees, independent contractors (including contract research organizations (“CROs”)), principal investigators, consultants, commercial partners and independent sales agents may engage in fraudulent conduct or other illegal activity and/or may fail to disclose unauthorized activities to us.

Misconduct by these parties could include, but is not limited to, intentional, reckless and/or negligent failures to comply with the laws and regulations of the FDA and its foreign counterparts, including, but not limited to, those relating to the manufacture, processing, packing, holding, investigating or distributing in commerce of medical devices, biological products and/or HCT/Ps, requiring the reporting of true, complete and accurate information to such regulatory bodies (including any safety problems associated with the use of our products), and relating to the conduct of clinical studies and the protection of human research subject.

In particular, companies involved in the manufacture of medical products are subject to laws and regulations intended to ensure that medical products that will be used in patients are safe and effective, and specifically that they are

not adulterated or contaminated, that they are properly labeled, and have the identity, strength, quality and purity that which they are represented to possess.

Further, companies involved in the research and development of medical products are subject to extensive laws and regulations intended to protect research subjects and ensure the integrity of data generated from clinical studies and of the regulatory review process.

Any misconduct in any of these areas, whether by our own employees or by contractors, vendors, business associates, consultants or other entities acting as our agents, could result in regulatory sanctions, criminal or civil liability and serious harm to our reputation.

It is not always possible to identify and deter misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in preventing such conduct, mitigating risks, or reducing the chance of governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to comply with these laws or regulations.

If any such investigations or other actions or lawsuits are instituted against us, those actions could have a significant impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations, including, without limitation, the imposition of significant fines and other sanctions that may materially impair our ability to run a profitable business.

Even if we are successful in defending against the imposition of any such fines or other sanctions, we could be required to incur substantial legal fees and other costs, and management’s attention will be diverted from our core business operations, either of which would negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our ability to use certain tax attributes to offset future income tax liabilities may be subject to limitations.

We have net operating losses and other tax attributes, including net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) for federal income tax purposes of approximately $65.5 million and state NOLs of approximately $18.2 million as of December 31, 2021.

If not utilized, $17.7 million of our NOLs will begin to expire for federal income tax purposes beginning in 2036, and our state NOLs will expire beginning in 2030.

Our ability to utilize our federal NOLs will depend on our future income, and there is a risk that our NOLs could expire unused and be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities, which could adversely affect our operating results.

In addition, our ability to utilize our NOLs may be subject to an annual limitation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

In general, under Sections 382 and 383 of the Code, a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change” is subject to limitations on its ability to utilize its pre-change NOLs or tax credits to offset future taxable income.

If we undergo an ownership change or have previously undergone an ownership change, our ability to utilize federal NOLs or tax credits could be limited by Sections 382 and 383 of the Code.

Additionally, future changes in our stock ownership, many of which are outside of our control, could result in an ownership change under Sections 382 and 383 of the Code.

Our state NOLs or credits may also be impaired under state tax law.

Accordingly, we may not be able to utilize a material portion of our federal and state NOLs or credits.

to utilize our NOLs or credits is conditioned upon our attaining profitability and generating U.S.

Our ability to utilize our NOLs or credits is conditioned upon our attaining profitability and generating U.S.

federal and state taxable income.

Valuation allowances have been provided for all deferred tax assets related to our federal and state NOLs.

In addition, other

tax attributes, such as interest carryforwards, are also subject to various limits on their use under the Code.

We have established

valuation allowances for our interest carry forwards to reflect these limitations and their anticipated impact on our ability to

utilize these tax attributes following the adoption of the December 2017 tax reform legislation known as H.R.

1, commonly referred

to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”) in the United States.

in tax laws, unfavorable resolution of tax contingencies or exposure to additional income tax liabilities could have a material

impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

We are subject to

income taxes as well as non-income based taxes in the United States.

We may from time to time be subject to tax audits in various

jurisdictions.

In addition, other tax attributes, such as interest carryforwards, are also subject to various limits on their use under the Code.

We have established valuation allowances for our interest carry forwards to reflect these limitations and their anticipated impact on our ability to utilize these tax attributes following the adoption of the December 2017 tax reform legislation known as H.R.

1, commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”) in the United States.

Changes in tax laws, unfavorable resolution of tax contingencies or exposure to additional income tax liabilities could have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

We are subject to income taxes as well as non-income based taxes in the United States.

We may from time to time be subject to tax audits in various jurisdictions.

Tax authorities may disagree with certain positions we have taken and assess additional taxes.

We regularly assess

the likely outcomes of any tax audits to which we are subject in order to determine the appropriateness of our tax provision and

have established contingency reserves for material, known tax exposures.

However, the calculation of such tax exposures involves

the application of complex tax laws and regulations in many jurisdictions, as well as interpretations as to the legality under

state aid rules of the European Union of tax advantages granted in certain jurisdictions.

Therefore, there can be no assurance

that we will accurately predict the outcomes of any tax audits to which we may be subject or that issues raised by tax authorities

will be resolved at a financial cost that does not exceed our related reserves and the actual outcomes of any such audit could

have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

Changes in tax laws

and regulations, or their interpretation and application, in the jurisdictions where we are subject to tax, could materially impact

our effective tax rate.

For example, changes in tax law implemented by the TCJA became effective in 2018 and 2019, and we expect

We regularly assess the likely outcomes of any tax audits to which we are subject in order to determine the appropriateness of our tax provision and have established contingency reserves for material, known tax exposures.

However, the calculation of such tax exposures involves the application of complex tax laws and regulations in many jurisdictions, as well as interpretations as to the legality under state aid rules of the EU of tax advantages granted in certain jurisdictions.

Therefore, there can be no assurance that we will accurately predict the outcomes of any tax audits to which we may be subject or that issues raised by tax authorities will be resolved at a financial cost that does not exceed our related reserves and the actual outcomes of any such audit could have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

Changes in tax laws and regulations, or their interpretation and application, in the jurisdictions where we are subject to tax, could materially impact our effective tax rate.

For example, changes in tax law implemented by the TCJA became effective in 2018 and 2019, and we expect the U.S.

Treasury to continue to issue future notices and regulations under the TCJA.

Certain provisions of the TCJA and the regulations

issued thereunder could have a significant impact on our future results of operations as could interpretations made by us in the

absence of regulatory guidance and judicial interpretations.

In addition, in 2018, we established valuation allowances against

all deferred tax assets (including interest carry forwards) to reflect certain limitations on these assets and their anticipated

impact on our ability to utilize these tax assets following the adoption of the TCJA.

Additionally, the

Congress, government agencies in jurisdictions outside the United States where we do business and the Organization for Economic

Co-operation and Development (the “OECD”) have recently focused on issues related to the taxation of multinational

corporations.

One example is in the area of “base erosion and profit shifting,”

where profits are claimed to be earned

for tax purposes in low-tax jurisdictions, or payments are made between affiliates from a jurisdiction with high tax rates to a

jurisdiction with lower tax rates.

The OECD has released several components of its comprehensive plan to create an agreed set of

international rules for fighting base erosion and profit shifting.

As a result, the tax laws in the United States and other countries,

in which we do business, could change on a prospective or retroactive basis and any such changes could materially adversely affect

our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As we conduct

clinical studies designed to generate long-term data on some of our existing products, the data we generate may not be consistent

with our existing data and may demonstrate less favorable safety or efficacy.

We are currently collecting

and plan to continue collecting long-term clinical data regarding the quality, safety and effectiveness of some of our existing

The clinical data collected and generated as part of these studies will further strengthen our clinical evaluation concerning

safety and performance of these products.

We believe that this additional data will help with the marketing of our products by

providing surgeons and physicians with additional confidence in their long-term safety and efficacy.

If the results of these clinical

studies are negative, these results could reduce demand for our products and significantly reduce our ability to achieve expected

We do not expect to undertake such studies for all of our products and will only do so in the future where we anticipate

the benefits will outweigh the costs and risks.

For these reasons, surgeons and physicians could be less likely to purchase our

products than competing products for which longer-term clinical data are available.

Also, we may not choose or be able to generate

the comparative data that some of our competitors have or are generating and we may be subject to greater regulatory and product

liability risks.

If we are unable to or determined not to collect sufficient long-term clinical data supporting the quality, safety

and effectiveness of our existing products, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our estimates

of market opportunity and forecasts of market and sales growth may prove to be inaccurate, and even if the markets in which we

compete achieve the forecasted growth, our business could fail to grow at similar rates, if at all.

Market opportunity

estimates and growth forecasts are inherently uncertain.

Our estimates of the annual total addressable markets for our products

are based on a number of internal and third-party estimates and assumptions, including, without limitation, the number of implantable

electronic device procedures and orthopedic/spinal repair procedures, as well as the number of procedures using biologic products

annually in the United States.

While we believe our assumptions and the data underlying our estimates are reasonable, these assumptions

and estimates may not be correct and the conditions supporting our assumptions or estimates may change at any time, thereby reducing

the predictive accuracy of these underlying factors.

As a result, our estimates of the annual total addressable market for any

of our products may prove to be incorrect.

If the actual number of procedures, the price at which we are able to sell any of our

products, or the annual total addressable market is smaller than we have estimated, it may impair our sales growth and have an

adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to

Government Regulation

The regulatory

approval and clearance processes of the FDA and comparable foreign authorities are lengthy, time consuming and inherently unpredictable,

and if we are ultimately unable to obtain regulatory approval or other marketing authorizations for our products and product candidates,

our business will be substantially harmed.

The medical device

and biologics industries are regulated extensively by governmental authorities, principally the FDA, the E.U.

legislative bodies,

and corresponding state and foreign regulatory agencies and authorities.

The time required to obtain approval, clearance, certification

of conformity or other marketing authorizations from the FDA, European Union Notified Bodies, and comparable foreign authorities

is unpredictable but can often take many years following the commencement of clinical trials and depends upon numerous factors,

including the substantial discretion of the regulatory authorities.

In addition, policies, regulations, or the type and amount

of clinical data necessary to gain clearance or approval may change during the course of a product candidate’s clinical development

and may vary among jurisdictions.

Before we can market

or sell a new medical device or a new use of or a claim for or significant modification to an existing medical device in the United

States, we must obtain either clearance from the FDA under Section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “FDCA”)

or approval of an application for premarket approval, or PMA, unless an exemption applies.

In the United States, we have obtained

510(k) premarket clearance from the FDA to market products such as our CanGaroo, VasCure, ProxiCor and Tyke products.

In the 510(k)

premarket clearance process, the FDA must determine that a proposed device is “substantially equivalent”

legally on the market, known as a “predicate”

device, with respect to intended use, technology and safety and effectiveness,

in order to clear the proposed device for marketing.

Certain provisions of the TCJA and the regulations issued thereunder could have a significant impact on our future results of operations as could interpretations made by us in the absence of regulatory guidance and judicial interpretations.

In addition, in 2018, we established valuation allowances against all deferred tax assets (including interest carry forwards) to reflect certain limitations on these assets and their anticipated impact on our ability to utilize these tax assets following the adoption of the TCJA.

Additionally, the U.S.

Congress, government agencies in jurisdictions outside the United States where we do business and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (the “OECD”) have recently focused on issues related to the taxation of multinational corporations.

One example is in the area of “base erosion and profit shifting,” where profits are claimed to be earned for tax purposes in low-tax jurisdictions, or payments are made between affiliates from a jurisdiction with high tax rates to a jurisdiction with lower tax rates.

The OECD has released several components of its comprehensive plan to create an agreed set of international rules for fighting base erosion and profit shifting.

As a result, the tax laws in the United States and other countries, in which we do business, could change on a prospective or retroactive basis and any such changes could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As we conduct clinical studies designed to generate long-term data on some of our existing products, the data we generate may not be consistent with our existing data and may demonstrate less favorable safety or efficacy.

We are currently collecting and plan to continue collecting long-term clinical data regarding the quality, safety and effectiveness of some of our existing products.

The clinical data collected and generated as part of these studies will further strengthen our clinical evaluation concerning safety and performance of these products.

We believe that this additional data will help with the marketing of our products by providing surgeons and physicians with additional confidence in their long-term safety and efficacy.

If the results of these clinical studies are negative, these results could reduce demand for our products and significantly reduce our ability to achieve expected net sales.

We do not expect to undertake such studies for all of our products and will only do so in the future where we anticipate the benefits will outweigh the costs and risks.

For these reasons, surgeons and physicians could be less likely to purchase our products than competing products for which longer-term clinical data are available.

Also, we may not choose or be able to generate the comparative data that some of our competitors have or are generating and we may be subject to greater regulatory and product liability risks.

If we are unable to or determined not to collect sufficient long-term clinical data supporting the quality, safety and effectiveness of our existing products, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our estimates of market opportunity and forecasts of market and sales growth may prove to be inaccurate, and even if the markets in which we compete achieve the forecasted growth, our business could fail to grow at similar rates, if at all.

Market opportunity estimates and growth forecasts are inherently uncertain.

Our estimates of the annual total addressable markets for our products are based on a number of internal and third-party estimates and assumptions, including, without limitation, the number of implantable electronic device procedures and orthopedic/spinal repair procedures, as well as the number of procedures using biologic products annually in the United States.

While we believe our assumptions and the data underlying our estimates are reasonable, these assumptions and estimates may not be correct and the conditions supporting our assumptions or estimates may change at any time, thereby reducing the predictive accuracy of these underlying factors.

As a result, our estimates of the annual total addressable market for any of our products may prove to be incorrect.

If the actual number of procedures, the price at which we are able to sell any of our products, or the annual total addressable market is smaller than we have estimated, it may impair our sales growth and have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may face additional issues associated with the voluntary recall of the single donor lot of FiberCel if we are unable to show that we initiated a timely recall and recalled all deficient lots.

In June 2021, we issued a voluntary recall pertaining to a single donor lot of FiberCel Fiber Viable Bone Matrix, a bone repair product made from human tissue that is used in various orthopedic and spinal procedures.

We investigated the source of the infections in coordination with our distributor of the product, the FDA and the CDC.

The FDA has since inspected our Richmond, California production facility and this did not result in any Form-483 observations.

We have identified the 154 units comprising the single product lot in question.

Based on information from the CDC, 136 units within this product lot were implanted into 113 patients and the remaining 18 units were returned to either us or the CDC.

Of these 113 patients, CDC has identified at least 75 patients who have exhibited clinical or diagnostic findings consistent with tuberculosis infection.

The CDC has advised us that the CDC, working with state health agencies, has contacted all patients treated with the recalled lot of FiberCel to help ensure they are directed to appropriate medical treatment and has informed us that all patients were started on standard four-drug treatment for tuberculosis.

If it is determined that there are other lots that are similarly affected or we experience the same or similar circumstances in the future, this could adversely affect our ability to generate revenue and have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Moreover, we may face additional issues associated with our voluntary recall if we are unable to show that we initiated a timely recall.

Risks Related to Government Regulation

The regulatory approval, certification and clearance processes of the FDA and comparable foreign authorities and notified bodies are lengthy, time consuming and inherently unpredictable, and if we are ultimately unable to obtain regulatory approval or other marketing authorizations or certifications for our products and product candidates, our business will be substantially harmed.

The medical device and biologics industries are regulated extensively by governmental authorities, principally the FDA, the EU legislative bodies, and corresponding state and foreign regulatory agencies and authorities.

The time required to obtain approval, clearance, certification of conformity or other marketing authorizations from the FDA, notified bodies in the EU/UK, and comparable foreign authorities is unpredictable but can often take many years following the commencement of clinical studies and depends upon numerous factors, including the substantial discretion of the regulatory authorities.

In addition, policies, regulations, or the type and amount of clinical data necessary to gain clearance, certification or approval may change during the course of a product candidate’s clinical development and may vary among jurisdictions.

Before we can market or sell a new medical device or a new use of or a claim for or significant modification to an existing medical device in the United States, we must obtain either clearance from the FDA under Section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “FDCA”) or approval of an application for premarket approval, or PMA, unless an exemption applies.

In the United States, we have obtained 510(k) premarket clearance from the FDA to market products such as our CanGaroo, VasCure, ProxiCor and Tyke products.

In the 510(k) premarket clearance process, the FDA must determine that a proposed device is “substantially equivalent” to a device legally on the market, known as a “predicate” device, with respect to intended use, technology and safety and effectiveness, in order to clear the proposed device for marketing.

Clinical data is sometimes required to support a finding of substantial equivalence.

Under certain conditions, a medical device is required to be approved under a PMA before it may be legally marketed.

The PMA pathway

requires an applicant to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the device based, in part, on extensive data, including, but

not limited to, technical, nonclinical, clinical trial, manufacturing and labeling data.

The PMA process is typically required

for devices that are deemed to pose the greatest risk, such as life-sustaining, life-supporting or implantable devices.

some devices are automatically subject to the PMA pathway regardless of the level of risk they pose because they have not previously

been classified into a lower risk class by the FDA.

Manufacturers of these devices may request that FDA review such devices in

accordance with the de novo classification procedure, which allows a manufacturer whose novel device would otherwise require

the submission and approval of a PMA prior to marketing to request down-classification of the device on the basis that the device

presents low or moderate risk.

If the FDA agrees with the down classification based on a de novo submission, the FDA will

authorize the device for marketing.

The PMA pathway requires an applicant to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the device based, in part, on extensive data, including, but not limited to, technical, nonclinical, clinical study, manufacturing and labeling data.

The PMA process is typically required for devices that are deemed to pose the greatest risk, such as life-sustaining, life-supporting or implantable devices.

However, some devices are automatically subject to the PMA pathway regardless of the level of risk they pose because they have not previously been classified into a lower risk class by the FDA.

Manufacturers of these devices may request that FDA review such devices in accordance with the de novo classification procedure, which allows a manufacturer whose novel device would otherwise require the submission and approval of a PMA prior to marketing to request down-classification of the device on the basis that the device presents low or moderate risk.

If the FDA agrees with

the down classification based on a de novo submission, the FDA will authorize the device for marketing.

This device type can then be used as a predicate device for future 510(k) submissions.

The process of obtaining

regulatory clearances or approvals, or completing the de novo classification process, to market a medical device can be

costly and time consuming, and we may not be able to successfully obtain pre-market reviews on a timely basis, if at all.

FDA requires us to go through a lengthier, more rigorous examination for our products than we expect, our product introductions

or modifications could be delayed or canceled, which could cause our sales to decline.

Further, even where a PMA is not required,

we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain 510(k) clearances with respect to such product candidates or modifications

to previously cleared products.

The FDA or any foreign

regulatory bodies can delay, limit or deny approval or clearance of our product candidates or require us to conduct additional

nonclinical or clinical testing or abandon a program for many reasons, including:

the FDA or the applicable foreign regulatory agency’s disagreement with the design or implementation

of our clinical trials;

negative or ambiguous results from our clinical trials or results that may not meet the level of

statistical significance required by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory agencies for approval;

serious and unexpected drug or device-related side effects experienced by participants in our clinical

trials or by individuals using devices similar to our products or natural product candidates;

our inability to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA or the applicable foreign regulatory

body that our product candidates are safe and effective for their intended uses, or in the case of the 510(k) clearance process,

that our product candidate is substantially equivalent to a predicate device;

the FDA’s or the applicable foreign regulatory agency’s disagreement with the interpretation

of data from pre-clinical studies or clinical trials;

our inability to demonstrate the clinical and other benefits of our product candidates outweigh

any safety or other perceived risks;

the FDA’s or the applicable foreign regulatory agency’s requirement for additional

pre-clinical studies or clinical trials;

the FDA’s or the applicable foreign regulatory agency’s disagreement regarding the

formulation, labeling or the specifications of our products or future product candidates;

the FDA’s or the applicable foreign regulatory agency’s failure to approve the manufacturing

processes or facilities of third-party manufacturers with which we contract;

the potential for approval or clearance policies or regulations of the FDA or the applicable foreign

regulatory agencies to significantly change in a manner rendering our clinical data insufficient for approval.

Of the large number

of products in development, only a small percentage successfully complete the FDA or foreign regulatory approval processes and

are commercialized.

The lengthy approval or marketing authorization process, as well as the unpredictability of future clinical

trial results, may result in our failing to obtain regulatory clearance, approval or other marketing authorization to market our

product candidates, which would significantly harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Even if we eventually

complete clinical testing and receive approval or clearance of an FDA or foreign marketing application for our product candidates,

the FDA or the applicable foreign regulatory agency may grant clearance, approval or other marketing authorization contingent on

the performance of costly additional clinical trials, including post-market clinical trials.

The FDA or the applicable foreign

regulatory agency also may clear, approve or authorize for marketing a product candidate for a more limited indication or patient

population than we originally requested, and the FDA or applicable foreign regulatory agency may not approve or authorize the labeling

that we believe is necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of a product candidate.

Any delay in obtaining,

or inability to obtain, applicable regulatory clearance, approval or other marketing authorization would delay or prevent commercialization

of that product candidate and would materially adversely impact our business and prospects.

may cause or contribute to adverse medical events or be subject to failures or malfunctions that we are required to report to the

FDA, and if we fail to do so, we would be subject to sanctions that could harm our reputation, business, financial condition and

results of operations.

The discovery of serious safety issues with our products, or a recall of our products either voluntarily

or at the direction of the FDA or another governmental authority, could have a negative impact on us.

Some of our marketed

products are subject to Medical Device Reporting (“MDR”) obligations, which require that we report to the FDA or the

Competent Authorities of the European Union, any incident in which our products may have caused or contributed to a death or serious

injury, or in which our products malfunctioned and, if the malfunction were to recur, it could likely cause or contribute to a

death or serious injury.

The timing of our obligation to report under the MDR regulations is triggered by the date we become aware

of the adverse event as well as the nature of the event.

We may fail to report adverse events of which we become aware within the

prescribed timeframe.

We may also fail to recognize that we have become aware of a reportable adverse event, especially if it is

not reported to us as an adverse event or if it is an adverse event that is unexpected or removed in time from the use of our product.

If we fail to comply with our reporting obligations, the FDA, or the Competent Authorities of the European Union, could take action,

including warning letters, untitled letters, administrative actions, criminal prosecution, imposition of civil monetary penalties,

revocation of our device clearance or approval, seizure of our products or delay in clearance or approval of future products.

The FDA, the Competent

Authorities of the European Union, and foreign regulatory bodies have the authority to require the recall of commercialized products

in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design or manufacture of a product or in the event that a product poses an

unacceptable risk to health.

The FDA’s authority to require a recall must be based on a finding that there is reasonable

probability that the device could cause serious injury or death.

We may also choose to voluntarily recall a product if any material

deficiency is found.

A government-mandated or voluntary recall by us could occur as a result of an unacceptable risk to health,

component failures, malfunctions, manufacturing defects, labeling or design deficiencies, packaging defects or other deficiencies

or failures to comply with applicable regulations.

The process of obtaining regulatory clearances or approvals, or completing the de novo classification process, to market a medical device can be costly and time consuming, and we may not be able to successfully obtain pre-market reviews on a timely basis, if at all.

If the FDA requires us to go through a lengthier, more rigorous examination for our products than we expect, our product introductions or modifications could be delayed or canceled, which could cause our sales to decline.

Further, even where a PMA is not required, we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain 510(k) clearances with respect to such product candidates or modifications to previously cleared products.

To the extent we sell medical devices in EU member states, our products must comply with the general safety and performance requirements of the Medical Devices Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 2017/745).

Compliance with these requirements is a prerequisite to be able to affix the European Conformity, or CE, mark to our products, without which they cannot be sold or marketed in the EU.

All medical devices placed on the market in the EU must meet the general safety and performance requirements laid down in Annex I to the Medical Devices Regulation including the requirement that a medical device must be designed and manufactured in such a way that, during normal conditions of use, it is suitable for its intended purpose.

Medical devices must be safe and effective and must not compromise the clinical condition or safety of patients, or the safety and health of users and – where applicable – other persons, provided that any risks which may be associated with their use constitute acceptable risks when weighed against the benefits to the patient and are compatible with a high level of protection of health and safety, taking into account the generally acknowledged state of the art.

To demonstrate compliance with the general safety and performance requirements, we must undergo a conformity assessment procedure, which varies according to the type of medical device and its (risk) classification.

Except for low risk medical devices (Class I), where the manufacturer can self-assess the conformity of its products with the general safety and performance requirements (except for any parts which relate to sterility, metrology or reuse aspects), a conformity assessment procedure requires the intervention of a notified body.

The notified body would typically audit and examine the technical file and the quality system for the manufacture, design and final inspection of our devices.

If satisfied that the relevant product conforms to the relevant general safety and performance requirements, the notified body issues a certificate of conformity, which the manufacturer uses as a basis for its own declaration of conformity.

The manufacturer may then apply the CE mark to the device, which allows the device to be placed on the market throughout the EU.

If we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we would be unable to affix the CE mark to our products, which would prevent us from selling them within the EU.

The aforementioned EU rules are generally applicable in the European Economic Area, or EEA (which consists of the 27 EU member states plus Norway, Liechtenstein and Iceland).

Non-compliance with the above requirements would also prevent us from selling our products in these three countries.

The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement, or TCA, came into effect on January 1, 2021.

The TCA does not specifically refer to medical devices.

However, as a result of Brexit, the EU Medical Devices Regulation will not be implemented in the UK, and previous legislation that mirrored the EU Medical Devices Regulation in the UK law has been revoked.

The regulatory regime for medical devices in Great Britain (England, Scotland and Wales) will continue to be based on the requirements derived from current EU legislation, and the UK may choose to retain regulatory flexibility or align with the EU Medical Devices Regulation going forward.

CE markings will continue to be recognized in the UK, and certificates issued by EU-recognized notified bodies will be valid in the UK, until June 30, 2023.

For medical devices placed on the market in Great Britain after this period, the UKCA, marking will be mandatory.

In contrast, UKCA marking and certificates issued by UK notified bodies will not be recognized on the EU market.

The TCA does provide for cooperation and exchange of information in the area of product safety and compliance, including market surveillance, enforcement activities and measures, standardization related activities, exchanges of officials, and coordinated product recalls (or other similar actions).

For medical devices that are locally manufactured but use components from other countries, the “rules of origin” criteria will need to be reviewed.

Depending on which countries products will be ultimately sold in, manufacturers may start seeking alternative sources for components if this would allow them to benefit from no tariffs.

The rules for placing medical devices on the Northern Ireland market will differ from those in Great Britain.

These modifications may have an effect on the way we intend to conduct our business in these countries.

The FDA or any foreign regulatory bodies or notified body can delay, limit or deny approval, certification or clearance of our product candidates or require us to conduct additional nonclinical or clinical testing or abandon a program for many reasons, including:

● the FDA or the applicable foreign regulatory agency or notified body’s disagreement with the design or implementation of our clinical studies;

● negative or ambiguous results from our clinical studies or results that may not meet the level of statistical significance required by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory agencies or notified body for approval or certification;

● serious and unexpected drug or device-related side effects experienced by participants in our clinical studies or by individuals using devices similar to our products or natural product candidates;

● our inability to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA or the applicable foreign regulatory body or notified body that our product candidates are safe and effective for their intended uses, or in the case of the 510(k) clearance process, that our product candidate is substantially equivalent to a predicate device;

● the FDA’s or the applicable foreign regulatory agency or notified body’s disagreement with the interpretation of data from pre-clinical or clinical studies;

● our inability to demonstrate the clinical and other benefits of our product candidates outweigh any safety or other perceived risks;

● the FDA’s or the applicable foreign regulatory agency or notified body’s requirement for additional pre-clinical studies or clinical studies;

● the FDA’s or the applicable foreign regulatory agency or notified body’s disagreement regarding the formulation, labeling or the specifications of our products or future product candidates;

● the FDA’s or the applicable foreign regulatory agency’s failure to approve the manufacturing processes or facilities of third-party manufacturers with which we contract;

● the potential for approval or clearance policies or regulations of the FDA or the applicable foreign regulatory agencies or notified bodies to significantly change in a manner rendering our clinical data insufficient for approval.

Of the large number of products in development, only a small percentage successfully complete the FDA or foreign regulatory approval or certification processes and are commercialized.

The lengthy approval, marketing authorization or certification process, as well as the unpredictability of future clinical study results, may result in our failing to obtain regulatory clearance, approval, certification or other marketing authorization to market our product candidates, which would significantly harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Even if we eventually complete clinical testing and receive approval or clearance of an FDA or foreign marketing application or certification for our product candidates, the FDA or the applicable foreign regulatory agency or notified body may grant clearance, certification, approval or other marketing authorization contingent on the performance of costly additional clinical studies, including post-market clinical studies.

The FDA or the applicable foreign regulatory agency or notified body also may clear, approve or authorize for marketing a product candidate for a more limited indication or patient population than we originally requested, and the FDA or applicable foreign regulatory agency or notified body may not approve, certify or authorize the labeling that we believe is necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of a product candidate.

Any delay in obtaining, or inability to obtain, applicable regulatory clearance, certification, approval or other marketing authorization would delay or prevent commercialization of that product candidate and would materially adversely impact our business and prospects.

Our products may cause or contribute to adverse medical events or be subject to failures or malfunctions that we are required to report to the FDA, and if we fail to do so, we would be subject to sanctions that could harm our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.

The discovery of serious safety issues with our products, or a recall of our products either voluntarily or at the direction of the FDA or another governmental authority, could have a negative impact on us.

Some of our marketed products are subject to Medical Device Reporting (“MDR”) obligations, which require that we report to the FDA or the Competent Authorities of the European Union member states, any incident in which our products may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury, or in which our products malfunctioned and, if the malfunction were to recur, it could likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.

The timing of our obligation to report under the MDR regulations is triggered by the date we become aware of the adverse event as well as the nature of the event.

We may fail to report adverse events of which we become aware within the prescribed timeframe.

We may also fail to recognize that we have become aware of a reportable adverse event, especially if it is not reported to us as an adverse event or if it is an adverse event that is unexpected or removed in time from the use of our product.

If we fail to comply with our reporting obligations, the FDA, or the Competent Authorities of the European Union member states, could take action, including warning letters, untitled letters, administrative actions, criminal prosecution, imposition of civil monetary penalties, revocation of our device clearance or approval, seizure of our products or delay in clearance, certification or approval of future products.

The FDA, the Competent Authorities of the European Union member states, and foreign regulatory bodies have the authority to require the recall of commercialized products in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design or manufacture of a product or in the event that a product poses an unacceptable risk to health.

The FDA’s authority to require a recall for a medical device must be based on a finding that there is reasonable probability that the device could cause serious injury or death.

With respect to human cells, tissues, and cellular and tissue-based products (“HCT/Ps”), the FDA may also require a recall where the conditions of manufacture of the HCT/P do not provide adequate protections against risks of communicable disease transmission, or where the HCT/P is infected or contaminated so as to be a source of dangerous infections to humans.

We may also choose to voluntarily recall a product if any material deficiency is found.

A government-mandated or voluntary recall by us could occur as a result of an unacceptable risk to health, component failures, malfunctions, manufacturing defects, labeling or design deficiencies, packaging defects or other deficiencies or failures to comply with applicable regulations.

Product defects or other errors may occur in the future.

Depending on the corrective

action we take to redress a product’s deficiencies or defects, the FDA may require, or we may decide, that we will need to

obtain new clearances or approvals for the device before we may market or distribute the corrected device.

Seeking such clearances

or approvals may delay our ability to replace the recalled devices in a timely manner.

Moreover, if we do not adequately address

problems associated with our devices, we may face additional regulatory enforcement action, including FDA warning letters, product

seizure, injunctions, administrative penalties or civil or criminal fines.

Companies are required

to maintain certain records of recalls and corrections, even if they are not reportable to the FDA.

We may initiate voluntary withdrawals

or corrections for our products in the future that we determine do not require notification of the FDA.

If the FDA disagrees with

our determinations, it could require us to report those actions as recalls, and we may be subject to enforcement action.

recall announcement could harm our reputation with customers, potentially lead to product liability claims against us and negatively

affect our sales.

Any corrective action, whether voluntary or involuntary, as well as defending ourselves in a lawsuit, will require

the dedication of our time and capital, distract management from operating our business and may harm our reputation and financial

Modifications

to our medical device products may require new 510(k) clearances or other marketing authorizations, and if we make modifications

to such products without obtaining requisite marketing authorization, we may be required to cease marketing or recall the modified

products until clearances or other marketing authorizations are obtained.

Any modification to

a cleared or approved medical device that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a major

change in its intended use, design or manufacture, requires a new 510(k) clearance or, possibly, approval of a PMA.

The FDA requires

every manufacturer to make this determination in the first instance, but the FDA may review any manufacturer’s decision.

In the EEA, we must comply with the EU medical device vigilance system.

Under this system, serious incidents and Field Safety Corrective Actions, or FSCAs must be reported to the relevant authorities of the EEA countries.

These reports will have to be submitted through Eudamed – once functional – and aim to ensure that, in addition to reporting to the relevant authorities of the EU member states, other actors such as the economic operators in the supply chain will also be informed.

Until Eudamed is fully functional, the corresponding provisions of the Medical Devices Directive continue to apply.

FSCAs must be communicated by the manufacturer or its legal representative to its customers and/or to the end users of the device through Field Safety Notices, or FSNs.

For similar serious incidents that occur with the same device or device type and for which the root cause has been identified or a FSCA implemented or where the incidents are common and well documented, manufacturers may provide periodic summary reports instead of individual serious incident reports.

Depending on the corrective action we take to redress a product’s deficiencies or defects, the FDA may require, or we may decide, that we will need to obtain new clearances, certifications or approvals for the device before we may market or distribute the corrected device.

Seeking such clearances, certification or approvals may delay our ability to replace the recalled devices in a timely manner.

Moreover, if we do not adequately address problems associated with our devices, we may face additional regulatory enforcement action, including FDA or foreign regulatory body warning letters, product seizure, injunctions, administrative penalties or civil or criminal fines.

Companies are required to maintain certain records of recalls and corrections, even if they are not reportable to the FDA or foreign regulatory bodies.

We may initiate voluntary withdrawals or corrections for our products in the future that we determine do not require notification of the FDA or foreign regulatory bodies.

If the FDA or foreign regulatory body disagrees with our determinations, it could require us to report those actions as recalls, and we may be subject to enforcement action.

A future recall announcement could harm our reputation with customers, potentially lead to product liability claims against us and negatively affect our sales.

Any corrective action, whether voluntary or involuntary, as well

as defending ourselves in a lawsuit, will require the dedication of our time and capital, distract management from operating our business and may harm our reputation and financial results.

Modifications to our medical device products may require new 510(k) clearances or other marketing authorizations or certifications, and if we make modifications to such products without obtaining requisite marketing authorization, we may be required to cease marketing or recall the modified products until clearances or other marketing authorizations or certifications are obtained.

Any modification to a cleared or approved medical device that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a major change in its intended use, design or manufacture, requires a new 510(k) clearance or, possibly, approval of a PMA.

The FDA requires every manufacturer to make this determination in the first instance, but the FDA may review any manufacturer’s decision.

The FDA may not agree with our decisions regarding whether new clearances or approvals are necessary.

We may make modifications

or add features to any of our product candidates that are cleared under the 510(k) clearance process in the future that we believe

do not require a new 510(k) clearance or approval of a PMA.

If the FDA disagrees with our determination and requires us to submit

new 510(k) notifications or PMA applications for modifications to our products for which we have concluded that new clearances

or approvals are unnecessary, we may be required to cease marketing or to recall the modified product until we obtain clearance

or approval, and we may be subject to significant regulatory fines or penalties.

In addition, the FDA may not approve or clear

our products for the indications that are necessary or desirable for successful commercialization or could require clinical trials

to support any modifications.

Any delay or failure in obtaining required clearances or approvals for such changes would adversely

affect our ability to introduce new or enhanced products in a timely manner, which in turn would harm our future growth.

these actions would harm our operating results.

or off-label use of our products may harm our reputation in the marketplace, result in injuries that lead to product liability

suits or result in costly investigations, fines or sanctions by regulatory bodies if we are deemed to have engaged in the promotion

of these uses, any of which could be costly to our business.

Our currently marketed

products have been cleared by the FDA for specific indications.

For example, our SimpliDerm product has been labeled for use to

repair or replace damaged or inadequate integumental tissue, our CanGaroo Envelope is intended to securely hold an implantable

electronic device to create a stable environment when implanted in the body and, in January 2021, we r eceived

CE marking approval for updated labeling of our CanGaroo envelope to allow for the addition of the antibiotic gentamicin in European

We train our marketing personnel and direct sales force to not promote our devices for uses outside of the FDA-approved

indications for use, known as “off-label uses.”

We cannot, however, prevent a physician from using our products off-label,

when in the physician’s independent professional medical judgment, he or she deems it appropriate.

There may be increased

risk of injury to patients if physicians attempt to use our products off-label.

Furthermore, the use of our products for indications

other than those authorized by the FDA or by any foreign regulatory body may not effectively treat such conditions, which could

harm our reputation in the marketplace among physicians and patients.

If the FDA or any

foreign regulatory body determines that our promotional materials or training constitute promotion of an off-label use, it could

request that we modify our training or promotional materials or subject us to regulatory or enforcement actions, including the

issuance or imposition of an untitled letter, which is used for violators that do not necessitate a warning letter, injunction,

seizure, civil fine or criminal penalties.

It is also possible that other federal, state or foreign enforcement authorities might

take action under other regulatory authority, such as false claims laws, if they consider our business activities to constitute

promotion of an off-label use, which could result in significant penalties, including, but not limited to, criminal, civil and

administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs and the

curtailment of our operations.

In addition, physicians

may misuse our products or use improper techniques if they are not adequately trained, potentially leading to injury and an increased

risk of product liability.

If our devices are misused or used with improper technique, we may become subject to costly litigation

by our customers or their patients.

As described above, product liability claims could divert management’s attention from

our core business, harm our reputation, be expensive to defend and result in sizeable damage awards against us that may not be

covered by insurance.

to comply with post-marketing regulatory requirements could subject us to enforcement actions, including substantial penalties,

and might require us to recall or withdraw a product from the market.

We are subject to

ongoing and pervasive regulatory requirements governing, among other things, the manufacture, marketing, advertising, medical device

reporting, sale, promotion, import, export, registration and listing of devices.

For example, we must submit periodic reports to

the FDA as a condition of receiving 510(k) clearances and other marketing authorizations.

These reports include information about

failures and certain adverse events associated with the device after its clearance.

Failure to submit such reports, or failure

to submit the reports in a timely manner, could result in enforcement action by the FDA.

Following its review of the periodic reports,

the FDA might ask for additional information or initiate further investigation.

The regulations to

which we are subject are complex and have become more stringent over time.

Regulatory changes could result in restrictions on our

ability to continue or expand our operations, and higher than anticipated costs or lower than anticipated sales.

Even after we

have obtained the proper regulatory clearance to market a device, we have ongoing responsibilities under FDA regulations and applicable

foreign laws and regulations.

We may make modifications or add features to any of our product candidates that are cleared under the 510(k) clearance process in the future that we believe do not require a new 510(k) clearance or approval of a PMA.

If the FDA disagrees with our determination and requires us to submit new 510(k) notifications or PMA applications for modifications to our products for which we have concluded that new clearances or approvals are unnecessary, we may be required to cease marketing or to recall the modified product until we obtain clearance or approval, and we may be subject to significant regulatory fines or penalties.

In addition, the FDA may not approve or clear our products for the indications that are necessary or desirable for successful commercialization or could require clinical studies to support any modifications.

Any delay or failure in obtaining required clearances or approvals for such changes would adversely affect our ability to introduce new or enhanced products in a timely manner, which in turn would harm our future growth.

Any of these actions would harm our operating results.

In the EU, we must inform the notified body that carried out the conformity assessment of the medical devices that we market or sell in the EU and EEA of any planned substantial changes to our quality system or substantial changes to our medical devices that could affect compliance with the general safety and performance requirements laid down in Annex I to the Medical Devices Regulation or cause a substantial change to the intended use for which the device has been CE marked.

The notified body will then assess the planned changes and verify whether they affect the products’ ongoing conformity with the Medical Devices Regulation.

If the assessment is favorable, the notified body will issue a new certificate of conformity or an addendum to the existing certificate attesting compliance with the general safety and performance requirements and quality system requirements laid down in the Annexes to the Medical Devices Regulation.

The misuse or off-label use of our products may harm our reputation in the marketplace, result in injuries that lead to product liability suits or result in costly investigations, fines or sanctions by regulatory bodies if we are deemed to have engaged in the promotion of these uses, any of which could be costly to our business.

Our currently marketed products have been cleared by the FDA for specific indications.

For example, our SimpliDerm product has been labeled for use to repair or replace damaged or inadequate integumental tissue, our CanGaroo Envelope is intended to securely hold an implantable electronic device to create a stable environment when implanted in the body and, in January 2021, we received CE certification for updated labeling of our CanGaroo envelope to allow for the addition of the antibiotic gentamicin in EU markets.

We train our marketing personnel and direct sales force to not promote our devices for uses outside of the FDA-approved indications for use, known as “off-label uses.” We cannot, however, prevent a physician from using our products off-label, when in the physician’s independent professional medical judgment, he or she deems it appropriate.

There may be increased risk of injury to patients if physicians attempt to use our products off-label.

Furthermore, the use of our products for indications other than those authorized or certified by the FDA or by any foreign regulatory body or notified body may not effectively treat such conditions, which could harm our reputation in the marketplace among physicians and patients.

If the FDA or any foreign regulatory body determines that our promotional materials or training constitute promotion of an off-label use, it could request that we modify our training or promotional materials or subject us to regulatory or enforcement actions, including the issuance or imposition of an untitled letter, which is used for violators that do not necessitate a warning letter, injunction, seizure, civil fine or criminal penalties.

It is also possible that other federal, state or foreign enforcement authorities might take action under other regulatory authority, such as false claims laws, if they consider our business activities to constitute promotion of an off-label use, which could result in significant

penalties, including, but not limited to, criminal, civil and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs and the curtailment of our operations.

In addition, physicians may misuse our products or use improper techniques if they are not adequately trained, potentially leading to injury and an increased risk of product liability.

If our devices are misused or used with improper technique, we may become subject to costly litigation by our customers or their patients.

As described above, product liability claims could divert management’s attention from our core business, harm our reputation, be expensive to defend and result in sizeable damage awards against us that may not be covered by insurance.

Failure to comply with post-marketing regulatory requirements could subject us to enforcement actions, including substantial penalties, and might require us to recall or withdraw a product from the market.

We are subject to ongoing and pervasive regulatory requirements governing, among other things, the manufacture, marketing, advertising, medical device reporting, sale, promotion, import, export, registration and listing of devices.

For example, we must submit periodic reports to the FDA as a condition of receiving 510(k) clearances and other marketing authorizations.

These reports include information about failures and certain adverse events associated with the device after its clearance.

Failure to submit such reports, or failure to submit the reports in a timely manner, could result in enforcement action by the FDA.

Following its review of the periodic reports, the FDA might ask for additional information or initiate further investigation.

The regulations to which we are subject are complex and have become more stringent over time.

Regulatory changes could result in restrictions on our ability to continue or expand our operations, and higher than anticipated costs or lower than anticipated sales.

Even after we have obtained the proper regulatory clearance to market a device, we have ongoing responsibilities under FDA regulations and applicable foreign laws and regulations.

The FDA, state and foreign regulatory authorities have broad enforcement powers.

Our failure to comply

with applicable regulatory requirements could result in enforcement action by the FDA, state or foreign regulatory authorities,

which may include any of the following sanctions:

Our failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements could result in enforcement action by the FDA, state or foreign regulatory authorities, which may include any of the following sanctions:

● untitled letters or warning letters;

3 unchanged sentences

● operating restrictions or partial suspension or total shutdown of production;

delays in or refusal to grant our requests for future clearances or approvals or foreign marketing

authorizations of new products, new intended uses or modifications to existing products;

withdrawals or suspensions of our current 510(k) clearances, resulting in prohibitions on sales

of our products;

FDA refusal to issue certificates to foreign governments needed to export products for sale in

other countries;

● delays in or refusal to grant our requests for future clearances or approvals or foreign marketing authorizations or certification of new products, new intended uses or modifications to existing products;

● withdrawals or suspensions of our current 510(k) clearances, resulting in prohibitions on sales of our products;

● FDA refusal to issue certificates to foreign governments needed to export products for sale in other countries;

● criminal prosecution.

Any of these sanctions

could result in higher than anticipated costs or lower than anticipated sales and have a material adverse effect on our reputation,

business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, the FDA

may change its clearance policies, adopt additional regulations or revise existing regulations, or take other actions, which may

prevent or delay clearance or approval of our future products under development or impact our ability to modify our currently cleared

products on a timely basis.

Such policy or regulatory changes could impose additional requirements upon us that could delay our

ability to obtain new clearances or approvals, increase the costs of compliance or restrict our ability to maintain our clearances

of our current products.

Over the last several years, the FDA has proposed reforms to its 510(k) clearance process, and such proposals

could include increased requirements for clinical data and a longer review period, or could make it more difficult for manufacturers

to utilize the 510(k) clearance process for their products.

For example, in November 2018, FDA officials announced steps that the

FDA intends to take to modernize the premarket notification pathway under Section 510(k) of the FDCA.

Among other things, the FDA

announced that it planned to develop proposals to drive manufacturers utilizing the 510(k) pathway toward the use of newer predicates.

These proposals included plans to potentially sunset certain older devices that were used as predicates under the 510(k) clearance

pathway, and to potentially publish a list of devices that have been cleared on the basis of demonstrated substantial equivalence

to predicate devices that are more than 10 years old.

These proposals have not yet been finalized or adopted, and the FDA may work

with Congress to implement such proposals through legislation.

Accordingly, it is unclear the extent to which any proposals, if

adopted, could impose additional regulatory requirements on us that could delay our ability to obtain new 510(k) clearances, increase

the costs of compliance or restrict our ability to maintain our current clearances, or otherwise create competition that may negatively

affect our business.

More recently, in

September 2019, the FDA finalized guidance describing an optional “safety and performance based”

premarket review pathway

for manufacturers of “certain, well-understood device types”

to demonstrate substantial equivalence under the

510(k) clearance pathway by showing that such device meets objective safety and performance criteria established by the FDA, thereby

obviating the need for manufacturers to compare the safety and performance of their medical devices to specific predicate devices

in the clearance process.

The FDA is developing a list of device types appropriate for the “safety and performance based”

pathway and will continue to develop product-specific guidance documents that identify the performance criteria for each such device

type, as well as the testing methods recommended in the guidance documents, where feasible.

The FDA may establish performance criteria

for classes of devices for which we or our competitors seek or currently have received clearance, and it is unclear the extent

to which such performance standards, if established, could impact our ability to obtain new 510(k) clearances or otherwise create

competition that may negatively affect our business.

In addition, FDA regulations

and guidance are often revised or reinterpreted by the FDA in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products.

Any new statutes, regulations or revisions or reinterpretations of existing regulations may impose additional costs or lengthen

review times of any future products or make it more difficult to obtain clearance or approval for, manufacture, market or distribute

our products.

We cannot determine what effect changes in regulations, statutes, legal interpretation or policies, when and if promulgated,

enacted or adopted may have on our business in the future.

Any of these sanctions could result in higher than anticipated costs or lower than anticipated sales and have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, the FDA may change its clearance policies, adopt additional regulations or revise existing regulations, or take other actions, which may prevent or delay clearance or approval of our future products under development or impact our ability to modify our currently cleared products on a timely basis.

Such policy or regulatory changes could impose additional requirements upon us that could delay our ability to obtain new clearances or approvals, increase the costs of compliance or restrict our ability to maintain our clearances of our current products.

Over the last several years, the FDA has proposed reforms to its 510(k) clearance process, and such proposals could include increased requirements for clinical data and a longer review period, or could make it more difficult for manufacturers to utilize the 510(k) clearance process for their products.

For example, in November 2018, FDA officials announced steps that the FDA intended to take to modernize the premarket notification pathway under Section 510(k) of the FDCA.

Among other things, the FDA announced that it planned to develop proposals to drive manufacturers utilizing the 510(k) pathway toward the use of newer predicates.

These proposals included plans to potentially sunset certain older devices that were used as predicates under the 510(k) clearance pathway, and to potentially publish a list of devices that have been cleared on the basis of demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicate devices that are more than 10 years old.

These proposals have not yet been finalized or adopted, and the FDA may work with Congress to implement such proposals through legislation.

Accordingly, it is unclear the extent to which any proposals, if adopted, could impose additional regulatory requirements on us that could delay our ability to obtain new 510(k) clearances, increase the costs of compliance or restrict our ability to maintain our current clearances, or otherwise create competition that may negatively affect our business.

More recently, in September 2019, the FDA finalized guidance describing an optional “safety and performance based” premarket review pathway for manufacturers of “certain, well-understood device types” to demonstrate substantial equivalence under the 510(k) clearance pathway by showing that such device meets objective safety and performance criteria established by the FDA, thereby obviating the need for manufacturers to compare the safety and performance of their medical devices to specific predicate devices in the clearance process.

The FDA is developing a list of device types appropriate for the “safety and performance based” pathway and will continue to develop product-specific guidance documents that identify the performance criteria for each such device type, as well as the testing methods recommended in the guidance documents, where feasible.

The FDA may establish performance criteria for classes of devices for which we or our competitors seek or currently have received clearance, and it is unclear the extent to which such performance standards, if established, could impact our ability to obtain new 510(k) clearances or otherwise create competition that may negatively affect our business.

In addition, FDA regulations and guidance are often revised or reinterpreted by the FDA in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products.

Any new statutes, regulations or revisions or reinterpretations of existing regulations may impose additional costs or lengthen review times of any future products or make it more difficult to obtain clearance or approval for, manufacture, market or distribute our products.

We cannot determine what effect changes in regulations, statutes, legal interpretation or policies, when and if promulgated, enacted or adopted may have on our business in the future.

Such changes could, among other things, require:

additional testing

prior to obtaining clearance or approval;

additional testing prior to obtaining clearance or approval;

changes to manufacturing methods;

1 unchanged sentence

or additional record keeping.

The FDA’s and

other regulatory authorities’

policies may change and additional government regulations may be promulgated that could prevent,

limit or delay regulatory clearance or approval of our product candidates.

We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of

government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad.

we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are

not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained and we may not achieve

or sustain profitability.

products are subject to extensive government regulation, and our failure to comply with these requirements could cause our business

In the United States,

we sell human tissue-derived bone allografts, such as ViBone, FiberCel and OsteGro V, which are referred to by the FDA as HCT/Ps.

Certain HCT/Ps are regulated by the FDA solely under Section 361 of the PHSA and are referred to as “Section 361 HCT/Ps,”

while other HCT/Ps are subject to FDA’s regulatory requirements applicable to medical devices or biologics.

Section 361 HCT/Ps

do not require 510(k) clearance, PMA approval, BLAs, or other premarket authorization from FDA before marketing.

We believe our

HCT/Ps are regulated solely under Section 361 of the PHSA and, therefore, we have not sought or obtained 510(k) clearance, PMA

approval, or licensure through a BLA.

The FDA could disagree with our determination that our human tissue products are Section

361 HCT/Ps and could determine that these products are biologics requiring a BLA or medical devices requiring 510(k) clearance

or PMA approval, and could require that we cease marketing such products and/or recall them pending appropriate clearance, approval

or license from the FDA.

For example, in public comments, the FDA has suggested that the use of human-derived acellular dermal

matrices, such as SimpliDerm, may not be considered HCT/Ps when utilized in breast reconstruction procedures.

As a result, we may

be required to conduct clinical studies and/or seek approval of a PMA before we are able to market SimpliDerm for use in breast

reconstruction.

Even though we believe

that our HCT/Ps are not subject to premarket approval or review, HCT/Ps are subject to donor eligibility and screening, Good Tissue

Practices, product labeling and post-market reporting requirements.

If we or our suppliers fail to comply with these requirements,

we could be subject to FDA enforcement action, including, for example, warning letters, fines, injunctions, product recalls or

seizures and, in the most serious cases, criminal penalties.

trial process is lengthy and expensive with uncertain outcomes.

We have limited data and experience regarding the safety and efficacy

of our products.

Results of earlier studies may not be predictive of future clinical trial results, or the safety or efficacy profile

for such products.

Clinical testing is

difficult to design and implement, can take many years, can be expensive and carries uncertain outcomes.

The long-term effects

of using our products in a large number of patients have not been studied, and the results of short-term clinical use of such products

do not necessarily predict long-term clinical benefits or reveal long-term adverse effects.

The results of pre-clinical

studies and clinical trials of our products conducted to date and ongoing or future studies and trials of our current, planned

or future products may not be predictive of the results of later clinical trials, and interim results of a clinical trial do not

necessarily predict final results.

Our interpretation of data and results from our clinical trials do not ensure that we will achieve

similar results in future clinical trials.

In addition, pre-clinical and clinical data are often susceptible to various interpretations

and analyses, and many companies that have believed their products performed satisfactorily in pre-clinical studies and earlier

clinical trials have, nonetheless, failed to replicate results in later clinical trials.

Products in later stages of clinical trials

may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy despite having progressed through nonclinical studies and earlier clinical trials.

The FDA’s and other regulatory authorities’ and notified bodies’ policies may change and additional government regulations may be promulgated that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory clearance or approval of our product candidates.

We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad.

If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability.

Our HCT/P products are subject to extensive government regulation, and our failure to comply with these requirements could cause our business to suffer.

In the United States, we sell human tissue-derived bone allografts, such as ViBone, Fiber VBM, and OsteGro V, which are referred to by the FDA as HCT/Ps.

Certain HCT/Ps are regulated by the FDA solely under Section 361 of the PHSA and are referred to as “Section 361 HCT/Ps,” while other HCT/Ps are subject to FDA’s regulatory requirements applicable to medical devices or biologics.

Section 361 HCT/Ps do not require 510(k) clearance, PMA approval, BLAs,

or other premarket authorization from FDA before marketing.

To be regulated as Section 361 HCT/Ps, these products must meet FDA’s criteria to be considered “minimally manipulated” and intended for “homologous use,” among other requirements.

HCT/Ps that do not meet the criteria of Section 361 are regulated under Section 351 of the PHSA.

HCT/Ps regulated as “351” HCT/Ps are subject to premarket review and approval by the FDA.

We believe our HCT/Ps are regulated solely under Section 361 of the PHSA and, therefore, we have not sought or obtained 510(k) clearance, PMA approval, or licensure through a BLA.

The FDA could disagree with our determination that our human tissue products are Section 361 HCT/Ps and could determine that these products are biologics requiring a BLA or medical devices requiring 510(k) clearance or PMA approval, and could require that we cease marketing such products and/or recall them pending appropriate clearance, approval or license from the FDA.

For example, in public comments, the FDA has suggested that the use of human-derived acellular dermal matrices, such as SimpliDerm, may not be considered HCT/Ps when utilized in breast reconstruction procedures.

As a result, we may be required to conduct clinical studies and/or seek approval of a PMA or BLA before we are able to market SimpliDerm for use in breast reconstruction.

Even though we believe that our HCT/Ps are not subject to premarket approval or review, HCT/Ps are subject to donor eligibility and screening, Good Tissue Practices, product labeling and post-market reporting requirements.

If we or our suppliers fail to comply with these requirements, we could be subject to FDA enforcement action, including, for example, warning letters, fines, injunctions, product recalls or seizures and, in the most serious cases, criminal penalties.

The clinical study process is lengthy and expensive with uncertain outcomes.

We have limited data and experience regarding the safety and efficacy of our products.

Results of earlier studies may not be predictive of future clinical study results, or the safety or efficacy profile for such products.

Clinical testing is difficult to design and implement, can take many years, can be expensive and carries uncertain outcomes.

The long-term effects of using our products in a large number of patients have not been studied, and the results of short-term clinical use of such products do not necessarily predict long-term clinical benefits or reveal long-term adverse effects.

The results of pre-clinical and clinical studies of our products conducted to date and ongoing or future studies of our current, planned or future products may not be predictive of the results of later clinical studies, and interim results of a clinical study do not necessarily predict final results.

Our interpretation of data and results from our clinical studies do not ensure that we will achieve similar results in future clinical studies.

In addition, pre-clinical and clinical data are often susceptible to various interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their products performed satisfactorily in pre-clinical studies and earlier clinical studies have, nonetheless, failed to replicate results in later clinical studies.

Products in later stages of clinical studies may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy despite having progressed through nonclinical studies and earlier clinical studies.

Failure can occur at any stage of clinical testing.

Our clinical studies may produce negative or inconclusive results, and we may

decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional clinical and non-clinical testing in addition to those we have planned.

The initiation and

completion of any of clinical studies may be prevented, delayed or halted for numerous reasons.

We may experience delays in our

ongoing clinical trials for a number of reasons, which could adversely affect the costs, timing or successful completion of our

clinical trials, including related to the following:

we may be required to submit an investigational device exemption, or IDE, application to the FDA,

which must become effective prior to commencing certain human clinical trials of medical devices, and the FDA may reject our IDE

application and notify us that we may not begin clinical trials;

regulators and other comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree as to the design or

implementation of our clinical trials;

regulators and/or IRBs, or other reviewing bodies may not authorize us or our investigators to

commence a clinical trial or to conduct or continue a clinical trial at a prospective or specific trial site;

we may not reach agreement on acceptable terms with prospective CROs and clinical trial sites,

the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites;

clinical trials may produce negative or inconclusive results, and we may decide, or regulators

may require us, to conduct additional clinical trials or abandon product development programs;

the number of subjects or patients required for clinical trials may be larger than we anticipate,

enrollment in these clinical trials may be insufficient or slower than we anticipate, and the number of clinical trials being conducted

at any given time may be high and result in fewer available patients for any given clinical trial, or patients may drop out of

these clinical trials at a higher rate than we anticipate;

our third-party contractors, including those manufacturing products or conducting clinical trials

on our behalf, may fail to comply with regulatory requirements or meet their contractual obligations to us in a timely manner or

we might have to suspend or terminate clinical trials for various reasons, including a finding

that the subjects are being exposed to unacceptable health risks;

we may have to amend clinical trial protocols or conduct additional studies to reflect changes

in regulatory requirements or guidance, which we may be required to submit to an IRB and/or regulatory authorities for re-examination;

regulators, IRBs or other parties may require or recommend that we or our investigators suspend

or terminate clinical research for various reasons, including safety signals or noncompliance with regulatory requirements;

the cost of clinical trials may be greater than we anticipate;

clinical sites may not adhere to the clinical protocol or may drop out of a clinical trial;

we may be unable to recruit a sufficient number of clinical trial sites;

regulators, IRBs or other reviewing bodies may fail to approve or subsequently find fault with

our manufacturing processes or facilities of third-party manufacturers with which we enter into agreement for clinical and commercial

supplies, the supply of devices or other materials necessary to conduct clinical trials may be insufficient, inadequate or not

available at an acceptable cost, or we may experience interruptions in supply;

approval policies or regulations of the FDA, the European Union or applicable foreign regulatory

agencies may change in a manner rendering our clinical data insufficient for approval;

Our clinical studies may produce negative or inconclusive results, and we may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional clinical and non-clinical testing in addition to those we have planned.

The initiation and completion of any of clinical studies may be prevented, delayed or halted for numerous reasons.

We may experience delays in our ongoing clinical studies for a number of reasons, which could adversely affect the costs, timing or successful completion of our clinical studies, including related to the following:

● we may be required to submit an investigational device exemption, or IDE, application to the FDA, which must become effective prior to commencing certain human clinical studies of medical devices, and the FDA may reject our IDE application and notify us that we may not begin clinical studies;

● regulators and other comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree as to the design or implementation of our clinical studies;

● regulators and/or IRBs, or other reviewing bodies may not authorize us or our investigators to commence a clinical study or to conduct or continue a clinical study at a prospective or specific study site;

● we may not reach agreement on acceptable terms with prospective CROs and clinical study sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and study sites;

● clinical studies may produce negative or inconclusive results, and we may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional clinical studies or abandon product development programs;

● the number of subjects or patients required for clinical studies may be larger than we anticipate, enrollment in these clinical studies may be insufficient or slower than we anticipate, and the number of clinical studies being conducted at any given time may be high and result in fewer available patients for any given clinical study, or patients may drop out of these clinical studies at a higher rate than we anticipate;

● our third-party contractors, including those manufacturing products or conducting clinical studies on our behalf, may fail to comply with regulatory requirements or meet their contractual obligations to us in a timely manner or at all;

● we might have to suspend or terminate clinical studies for various reasons, including a finding that the subjects are being exposed to unacceptable health risks;

● we may have to amend clinical study protocols or conduct additional studies to reflect changes in regulatory requirements or guidance, which we may be required to submit to an IRB and/or regulatory authorities for re-examination;

● regulators, IRBs or other parties may require or recommend that we or our investigators suspend or terminate clinical research for various reasons, including safety signals or noncompliance with regulatory requirements;

● the cost of clinical studies may be greater than we anticipate;

● clinical sites may not adhere to the clinical protocol or may drop out of a clinical study;

● we may be unable to recruit a sufficient number of clinical study sites;

● regulators, IRBs or other reviewing bodies may fail to approve or subsequently find fault with our manufacturing processes or facilities of third-party manufacturers with which we enter into agreement for clinical and commercial supplies, the supply of devices or other materials necessary to conduct clinical studies may be insufficient, inadequate or not available at an acceptable cost, or we may experience interruptions in supply;

● approval policies or regulations of the FDA, the European Union or applicable foreign regulatory agencies may change in a manner rendering our clinical data insufficient for approval;

● our current or future products may have undesirable side effects or other unexpected characteristics.

In addition, disruptions

caused by the COVID-19 pandemic may increase the likelihood that we encounter such difficulties or delays in initiating, enrolling,

conducting or completing our planned and ongoing clinical trials.

Any of these occurrences may significantly harm our business,

financial condition and prospects.

In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion

of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates.

Patient enrollment

in clinical trials and completion of patient follow-up depend on many factors, including the size of the patient population, the

nature of the trial protocol, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for the clinical trial, patient

compliance, competing clinical trials and clinicians’

and patients’

perceptions as to the potential advantages of the

product being studied in relation to other available therapies, including any new treatments that may be approved for the indications

we are investigating.

For example, patients may be discouraged from enrolling in our clinical trials if the trial protocol requires

them to undergo extensive post-treatment procedures or follow-up to assess the safety and efficacy of a product candidate, or they

may be persuaded to participate in contemporaneous clinical trials of a competitor’s product candidate.

In addition, patients

participating in our clinical trials may drop out before completion of the trial or experience adverse medical events unrelated

to our products.

Delays in patient enrollment or failure of patients to continue to participate in a clinical trial may delay commencement

or completion of the clinical trial, cause an increase in the costs of the clinical trial and delays, or result in the failure

of the clinical trial.

Even if our future

products are cleared or approved in the United States, commercialization of our products in foreign countries would require clearance

or approval by regulatory authorities in those countries.

Clearance or approval procedures vary among jurisdictions and can involve

requirements and administrative review periods different from, and greater than, those in the United States, including additional

pre-clinical studies or clinical trials.

Any of these occurrences could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition

and results of operations.

at the FDA and other government agencies caused by funding shortages or global health concerns could hinder their ability to hire,

retain or deploy key leadership and other personnel, or otherwise prevent new or modified products from being developed, cleared

or approved or commercialized in a timely manner or at all, which could negatively impact our business.

The ability of the

FDA to review and clear or approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding

levels, statutory, regulatory and policy changes, the FDA’s ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment

of user fees and other events that may otherwise affect the FDA’s ability to perform routine functions.

Average review times

at the FDA have fluctuated in recent years as a result.

In addition, government funding of other government agencies that fund

research and development activities is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.

at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for medical devices and biologics or modifications to cleared or

for approved medical devices and biologics to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely

affect our business.

For example, over the last several years, including for 35 days beginning on December 22, 2018, the U.S.

has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, have had to furlough critical FDA employees and stop

critical activities.

Separately, in response

to the COVID-19 pandemic, on March 10, 2020, the FDA announced its intention to postpone most foreign inspections of manufacturing

facilities and products, and, on March 18, 2020, the FDA temporarily postponed routine surveillance inspections of domestic manufacturing

Subsequently, on July 10, 2020, the FDA announced its intention to resume certain on-site inspections of domestic manufacturing

facilities subject to a risk-based prioritization system.

The FDA intends to use this risk-based assessment system to identify

the categories of regulatory activity that can occur within a given geographic area, ranging from mission critical inspections

to resumption of all regulatory activities.

Regulatory authorities outside the United States may adopt similar restrictions or

other policy measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, or if global health concerns

continue to prevent the FDA, the European Union or other regulatory authorities from conducting their regular inspections, reviews,

or other regulatory activities, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA, the European Union or other regulatory authorities

to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are subject

to certain federal, state and foreign fraud and abuse laws, health information privacy and security laws and physician payment

transparency laws, which, if violated, could subject us to substantial penalties.

Additionally, any challenge to or investigation

into our practices under these laws could cause adverse publicity and be costly to respond to, and thus could harm our business.

There are numerous

federal and state, as well as foreign, laws pertaining to healthcare fraud and abuse, including anti-kickback, false claims

and physician transparency laws.

Our business practices and relationships with providers and hospitals are subject to scrutiny

under these laws.

We may also be subject to patient information privacy and security regulation by both the federal government

and the states and foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct our business.

The healthcare laws and regulations that may affect

our ability to operate include:

the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons and entities from

knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind,

to induce either the referral of an individual or furnishing or arranging for a good or service, for which payment may be made,

in whole or in part, under federal healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid.

A person or entity does not need to have

actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it to have committed a violation;

the federal civil and criminal false claims laws, including the federal civil False Claims Act,

which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment

from Medicare, Medicaid or other federal healthcare programs that are false or fraudulent.

Moreover, the government may assert

that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or

fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal civil False Claims Act.

Private individuals can bring False Claims Act “qui

actions, on behalf of the government and such individuals, commonly known as “whistleblowers,”

in amounts paid by the entity to the government in fines or settlement.

When an entity is determined to have violated the federal

civil False Claims Act, the government may impose civil penalties, including treble damages, and exclude the entity from participation

in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs;

the federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which prohibits, among other things, offering or transferring

remuneration to a federal healthcare beneficiary that a person knows or should know is likely to influence the beneficiary’s

decision to order or receive items or services reimbursable by the government from a particular provider or supplier;

the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), which created

additional federal criminal statutes that prohibit, among other things, executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program

and making false statements relating to healthcare matters.

Similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does

not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it to have committed a violation;

the federal Physician Sunshine Act, which requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics

and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or CHIP, to report annually to CMS, information related

to payments and other transfers of value to physicians, which is defined broadly to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists

and chiropractors, and teaching hospitals, and applicable manufacturers and group purchasing organizations, to report annually

ownership and investment interests held by such physicians and their immediate family members.

Manufacturers are required to submit

annual reports to CMS and failure to do so may result in civil monetary penalties for all payments, transfers of value or ownership

or investment interests not reported in an annual submission, and may result in liability under other federal laws or regulations.

Effective January 1, 2022, these reporting obligations will extend to include payments and transfers of value made to certain nonphysician

providers such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners;

analogous state and foreign law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback

and false claims laws, which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial insurers

state laws that require device companies to comply with the industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the

applicable compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare

providers and other potential referral sources;

state laws that require device manufacturers to report information related to payments

and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures;

and state laws related to

insurance fraud in the case of claims involving private insurers.

These laws and regulations,

among other things, constrain our business, marketing and other promotional activities by limiting the kinds of financial arrangements

we may have with hospitals, physicians or other potential purchasers of our products, as well as independent sales agents and distributors.

Due to the breadth of these laws, the narrowness of statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors available, and the range of

interpretations to which they are subject, it is possible that some of our current or future practices might be challenged under

one or more of these laws.

To enforce compliance

with the healthcare regulatory laws, certain enforcement bodies have recently increased their scrutiny of interactions between

healthcare companies and healthcare providers, which has led to a number of investigations, prosecutions, convictions and settlements

in the healthcare industry.

Responding to investigations can be time-and resource-consuming and can divert management’s attention

from the business.

Additionally, as a result of these investigations, healthcare providers and entities may have to agree to additional

compliance and reporting requirements as part of a consent decree or corporate integrity agreement.

Any such investigation or settlement

could increase our costs or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business.

Even an unsuccessful challenge or investigation into

our practices could cause adverse publicity, and be costly to respond to.

If our operations are found to be in violation of any

of the healthcare laws or regulations described above or any other healthcare regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to

penalties, including administrative, civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from participation in government healthcare

programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, imprisonment, contractual damages, reputational harm, disgorgement and the curtailment

or restructuring of our operations.

In addition, members

of our management and companies with which they are affiliated or have been affiliated with in the past, have been, and may in

the future be, involved in investigations, prosecutions, convictions or settlements in the healthcare industry.

For example, Kevin

Rakin, the chairman of our board of directors, was named as a defendant in United States ex rel.

In addition, disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic may increase the likelihood that we encounter such difficulties or delays in initiating, enrolling, conducting or completing our planned and ongoing clinical studies.

Any of these occurrences may significantly harm our business, financial condition and prospects.

In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical studies may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates.

Patient enrollment in clinical studies and completion of patient follow-up depend on many factors, including the size of the patient population, the nature of the study protocol, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for the clinical study, patient compliance, competing clinical studies and clinicians’ and patients’ perceptions as to

the potential advantages of the product being studied in relation to other available therapies, including any new treatments that may be approved for the indications we are investigating.

For example, patients may be discouraged from enrolling in our clinical studies if the study protocol requires them to undergo extensive post-treatment procedures or follow-up to assess the safety and efficacy of a product candidate, or they may be persuaded to participate in contemporaneous clinical studies of a competitor’s product candidate.

In addition, patients participating in our clinical studies may drop out before completion of the study or experience adverse medical events unrelated to our products.

Delays in patient enrollment or failure of patients to continue to participate in a clinical study may delay commencement or completion of the clinical study, cause an increase in the costs of the clinical study and delays, or result in the failure of the clinical study.

Even if our future products are cleared or approved in the United States, commercialization of our products in foreign countries would require clearance or approval by regulatory authorities in those countries.

Clearance or approval procedures vary among jurisdictions and can involve requirements and administrative review periods different from, and greater than, those in the United States, including additional pre-clinical studies or clinical studies.

Any of these occurrences could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Disruptions at the FDA and other government agencies or notified bodies caused by funding shortages or global health concerns could hinder their ability to hire, retain or deploy key leadership and other personnel, or otherwise prevent new or modified products from being developed, cleared, certified or approved or commercialized in a timely manner or at all, which could negatively impact our business.

The ability of the FDA, foreign regulatory authorities and notified bodies to review and clear, certify or approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, statutory, regulatory and policy changes, the FDA’s ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees and other events that may otherwise affect the FDA’s ability to perform routine functions.

Average review times at the FDA have fluctuated in recent years as a result.

In addition, government funding of other government agencies that fund research and development activities is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.

Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for medical devices and biologics or modifications to be cleared or for approved medical devices and biologics to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business.

For example, over the last several years, the U.S.

government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, have had to furlough critical FDA employees and stop critical activities.

Subsequently, in July 2020, the FDA resumed certain on-site inspections of domestic manufacturing facilities subject to a risk-based prioritization system.

The FDA utilized this risk-based assessment system to assist in determining when and where it was safest to conduct prioritized domestic inspections.

Additionally, on April 15, 2021, the FDA issued a guidance document in which the FDA described its plans to conduct voluntary remote interactive evaluations of certain drug manufacturing facilities and clinical research sites, among other facilities.

According to the guidance, the FDA may request such remote interactive evaluations where the FDA determines that remote evaluation would be appropriate based on mission needs and travel limitations.

In May 2021, the FDA outlined a detailed plan to move toward a more consistent state of inspectional operations, and in July 2021, the FDA resumed standard inspectional operations of domestic facilities and was continuing to maintain this level of operation as of September 2021.

More recently, the FDA has continued to monitor and implement changes to its inspectional activities to ensure the safety of its employees and those of the firms it regulates as it adapts to the evolving COVID-19 pandemic.

Regulatory authorities outside the United States may adopt similar restrictions or other policy measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, or if global health concerns continue to prevent the FDA, the EMA or other regulatory authorities from conducting their regular inspections, reviews, or other regulatory activities, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA, the EMA or other regulatory authorities to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

For instance, in the EU, notified bodies must be officially designated to certify products and services in accordance with the Medical Devices Regulation.

While several notified bodies have been designated the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly slowed down their designation process and the current designated notified bodies are facing a large amount of requests for (re)certification under the new regulation as a consequence of which notified body review times have lengthened significantly.

This situation could impact our ability to grow our business in the EU and EEA.

We are subject to certain federal, state and foreign fraud and abuse laws, which, if violated, could subject us to substantial penalties.

Additionally, any challenge to or investigation into our practices under these laws could cause adverse publicity and be costly to respond to, and thus could harm our business.

There are numerous U.S.

federal and state, as well as foreign, laws pertaining to healthcare fraud and abuse, including anti-kickback, false claims and physician transparency laws.

Our business practices and relationships with providers and hospitals are subject to scrutiny under these laws.

The healthcare laws and regulations that may affect our ability to operate include:

● the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons and entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce either the referral of an individual or furnishing or arranging for a good or service, for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under federal healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid.

A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it to have committed a violation;

● the federal civil and criminal false claims laws, including the federal civil False Claims Act, which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment from Medicare, Medicaid or other federal healthcare programs that are false or fraudulent.

Moreover, the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal civil False Claims Act.

Private individuals can bring False Claims Act “qui tam” actions, on behalf of the government and such individuals, commonly known as “whistleblowers,” may share in amounts paid by the entity to the government in fines or settlement.

When an entity is determined to have violated the federal civil False Claims Act, the government may impose civil penalties, including treble damages, and exclude the entity from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs;

● the federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which prohibits, among other things, offering or transferring remuneration to a federal healthcare beneficiary that a person knows or should know is likely to influence the beneficiary’s decision to order or receive items or services reimbursable by the government from a particular provider or supplier;

● the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), which created additional federal criminal statutes that prohibit, among other things, executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program and making false statements relating to healthcare matters.

Similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it to have committed a violation;

● the federal Physician Sunshine Act, which requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or CHIP, to report annually to CMS, information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians, which is defined broadly to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors, certain non-physician providers such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners, and teaching hospitals, and applicable manufacturers and GPOs, to report annually ownership and investment interests held by such physicians and their immediate family members.

Manufacturers are required to submit annual reports to CMS and failure to do so may result in civil monetary penalties for all payments, transfers of value or ownership or investment interests not reported in an annual submission, and may result in liability under other federal laws or regulations.

● analogous state and foreign law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial insurers or patients;

state laws that require device companies to comply with the industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the applicable compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential

referral sources;

state laws that require device manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures;

and state laws related to insurance fraud in the case of claims involving private insurers.

These laws and regulations, among other things, constrain our business, marketing and other promotional activities by limiting the kinds of financial arrangements we may have with hospitals, physicians or other potential purchasers of our products, as well as independent sales agents and distributors.

Due to the breadth of these laws, the narrowness of statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors available, and the range of interpretations to which they are subject, it is possible that some of our current or future practices might be challenged under one or more of these laws.

To enforce compliance with the healthcare regulatory laws, certain enforcement bodies have recently increased their scrutiny of interactions between healthcare companies and healthcare providers, which has led to a number of investigations, prosecutions, convictions and settlements in the healthcare industry.

Responding to investigations can be time-and resource-consuming and can divert management’s attention from the business.

Additionally, as a result of these investigations, healthcare providers and entities may have to agree to additional compliance and reporting requirements as part of a consent decree or corporate integrity agreement.

Any such investigation or settlement could increase our costs or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business.

Even an unsuccessful challenge or investigation into our practices could cause adverse publicity, and be costly to respond to.

If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the healthcare laws or regulations described above or any other healthcare regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including administrative, civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, imprisonment, contractual damages, reputational harm, disgorgement and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations.

In addition, members of our management and companies with which they are affiliated or have been affiliated with in the past, have been, and may in the future be, involved in investigations, prosecutions, convictions or settlements in the healthcare industry.

For example, Kevin Rakin, the chairman of our board of directors, was named as a defendant in United States ex rel.

Advanced BioHealing, Inc.

(“ABH”), a whistleblower suit relating to sales methods employed by sales representatives of ABH, a biotechnology company

for which Mr.

(“ABH”), a whistleblower suit relating to sales methods employed by sales representatives of ABH, a biotechnology company for which Mr.

Rakin served as its chief executive officer.

All claims in the lawsuit were dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

a settlement agreement, in which Mr.

All claims in the lawsuit were dismissed with prejudice pursuant to a settlement agreement, in which Mr.

Rakin expressly denied that he engaged in any wrongful conduct, and Mr.

Rakin agreed to pay

to the United States $2.5 million.

Any investigations, prosecutions, convictions or settlements involving members of our management

and companies with which they are or have been affiliated may be detrimental to our reputation and could negatively affect our

business, financial condition and results of operations.

policy changes, including recently enacted legislation reforming the U.S.

healthcare system, could harm our cash flows, financial

condition and results of operations.

In March 2010, the

ACA was enacted in the United States, which made a number of substantial changes in the way healthcare is financed by both governmental

and private insurers.

Among other ways in which it may impact our business, the ACA established a new Patient-Centered Outcomes

Research Institute to oversee and identify priorities in comparative clinical effectiveness research in an effort to coordinate

and develop such research, implemented payment system reforms, including a national pilot program on payment bundling to encourage

hospitals, physicians and other providers to improve the coordination, quality and efficiency of certain healthcare services through

bundled payment models, and expanded the eligibility criteria for Medicaid programs.

Since its enactment,

there have been judicial, U.S.

Congressional and executive branch challenges to certain aspects of the ACA, and we expect there

will be additional challenges and amendments to the ACA in the future.

For example, the TCJA was enacted, which includes a provision

repealing, effective January 1, 2019, the tax-based shared responsibility payment imposed by the ACA on certain individuals who

fail to maintain qualifying health coverage for all or part of a year that is commonly referred to as the “individual mandate”.

On December 14, 2018, a U.S.

District Court judge in the Northern District of Texas ruled that the individual mandate is a critical

and inseverable feature of the ACA and, therefore, because it was repealed as part of the Tax Act, the remaining provisions of

the ACA are invalid as well.

On December 18, 2019, the U.S.

Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit affirmed the District Court’s

decision that the individual mandate was unconstitutional but remanded the case back to the District Court to determine whether

the remaining provisions of the ACA are invalid as well.

On March 2, 2020, the U.S.

Supreme Court granted the petitions for writs

of certiorari to review the case, although it is unclear when a decision will be made or how the Supreme Court will rule.

there may be other efforts to challenge, repeal or replace the ACA.

We are continuing to monitor any changes to the ACA that, in

turn, may potentially impact our business in the future.

In addition, other

legislative changes have been proposed and adopted since the ACA was enacted.

On August 2, 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011

was signed into law, which, among other things, reduced Medicare payments to providers by 2% per fiscal year, effective on April

1, 2013 and, due to subsequent legislative amendments to the statute, was to remain in effect through 2029.

The CARES Act, which

was signed into law on March 27, 2020, temporarily suspended these reductions from May 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, and extended

the sequester by one additional year, through 2030.

In addition, on January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 was

signed into law, which, among other things, reduced Medicare payments to several providers, including hospitals, and increased

the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years.

We expect additional

state and federal healthcare reform measures to be adopted in the future, any of which could limit reimbursement for healthcare

products and services, which could result in reduced demand for our products or additional pricing pressure.

to comply with data protection laws and regulations could lead to government enforcement actions (which could include civil or

criminal penalties), private litigation and/or adverse publicity and could negatively affect our operating results and business.

We and our commercial

partners, independent sales agents, suppliers and other business partners may be subject to federal, state and foreign data protection

laws and regulations (i.e., laws and regulations that address data privacy and security).

In the United States, numerous federal

and state laws and regulations, including state data breach notification laws, state health information privacy laws, and federal

and state consumer protection laws and regulations (e.g., Section 5 of the FTC Act), that govern the collection, use, disclosure

and protection of health-related and other personal information could apply to our operations or the operations of our partners.

Rakin agreed to pay to the United States $2.5 million.

Any investigations, prosecutions, convictions or settlements involving members of our management and companies with which they are or have been affiliated may be detrimental to our reputation and could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Healthcare policy changes, including recently enacted legislation reforming the U.S.

healthcare system, could harm our cash flows, financial condition and results of operations.

In March 2010, the ACA was enacted in the United States, which made a number of substantial changes in the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers.

Among other ways in which it may impact our business, the ACA established a new Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute to oversee and identify priorities in comparative clinical effectiveness research in an effort to coordinate and develop such research, implemented payment system reforms, including a national pilot program on payment bundling to encourage hospitals, physicians and other providers to improve the coordination, quality and efficiency of certain healthcare services through bundled payment models, and expanded the eligibility criteria for Medicaid programs.

Since its enactment, there have been judicial, U.S.

Congressional and executive branch challenges to certain aspects of the ACA.

On June 17, 2021, the U.S.

Supreme Court dismissed the most recent judicial challenge to the ACA brought by several states without specifically ruling on the constitutionality of the ACA.

Thus, the ACA will remain in effect in its current form.

Further, prior to the U.S.

Supreme Court ruling, President Biden issued an executive order that initiated a special enrollment period for purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage through the ACA marketplace from February 15, 2021 through August 15, 2021.

The executive order instructed certain governmental agencies to review and reconsider their existing policies and rules that limit access to healthcare, including among others, reexamining Medicaid demonstration projects and waiver programs that include work requirements, and policies that create unnecessary barriers to obtaining access to health insurance coverage through Medicaid or the ACA.

In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted since the ACA was enacted.

On August 2, 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011 was signed into law, which, among other things, reduced Medicare payments to providers by 2% per fiscal year, effective on April 1, 2013 and, due to subsequent legislative amendments to the statute, was to remain in effect through 2030, with the exception of a temporary suspension from May 1, 2020 through March 31, 2022, unless additional Congressional action is taken.

In addition, on January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 was signed into law, which, among other things, reduced Medicare payments to several providers, including hospitals, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years.

We expect additional state and federal healthcare reform measures to be adopted in the future, any of which could limit reimbursement for healthcare products and services, which could result in reduced demand for our products or additional pricing pressure.

Failure to comply with data protection laws and regulations could lead to government enforcement actions (which could include civil or criminal penalties), private litigation and/or adverse publicity and could negatively affect our operating results and business.

We and our commercial partners, independent sales agents, suppliers and other business partners may be subject to federal, state and foreign data protection laws and regulations (i.e., laws and regulations that address data privacy and security).

In the United States, numerous federal and state laws and regulations, including state data breach notification laws, state health information privacy laws, and federal and state consumer protection laws and regulations (e.g., Section 5 of the FTC Act), that govern the collection, use, disclosure and protection of health-related and other personal information could apply to our operations or the operations of our partners.

We may also be subject to U.S.

federal rules, regulations and guidance concerning data security for medical devices, including

guidance from the FDA.

In addition, we may obtain health information from third parties (including research institutions from which

we obtain clinical trial data) that are subject to privacy and security requirements under HIPAA.

Depending on the facts and circumstances,

we could be subject to criminal penalties if we knowingly obtain, use, or disclose individually identifiable health information

maintained by a HIPAA-covered entity in a manner that is not authorized or permitted by HIPAA.

In addition, the CCPA

became effective on January 1, 2020.

The CCPA gives California residents expanded rights to access and delete their personal information,

opt out of certain personal information sharing and receive detailed information about how their personal information is used by

requiring covered companies to provide new disclosures to California consumers (as that term is broadly defined) and provide such

consumers new ways to opt out of certain sales of personal information.

The CCPA provides for civil penalties for violations, as

well as a private right of action for data breaches that is expected to increase data breach litigation.

Although there are limited

exemptions for certain health-related information, including certain clinical trial data, the CCPA may increase our compliance

costs and potential liability.

Additionally, a new California ballot initiative, the California Privacy Rights Act, appears to

have garnered enough signatures to be included on the November 2020 ballot, and if voted into law by California residents, would

impose additional data protection obligations on companies doing business in California, including additional consumer rights processes

and opt outs for certain uses of sensitive data.

It would also create a new California data protection agency specifically tasked

to enforce the law, which would likely result in increased regulatory scrutiny of California businesses in the areas of data protection

and security.

Similar laws have been proposed in other states and at the federal level, and if passed, such laws may have potentially

conflicting requirements that would make compliance challenging.

Foreign data protection

laws, including the E.U.

General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”), which became effective in May 2018, may also

apply to health-related and other personal information obtained outside of the United States.

The GDPR imposes stringent data protection

requirements for the processing of personal data in the EEA.

The GDPR imposes several stringent requirements for controllers and

processors of personal data, including, for example, higher standards for obtaining consent from individuals to process their personal

data, more robust disclosures to individuals and a strengthened individual data rights regime, shortened timelines for data breach

notifications, limitations on retention and secondary use of information (including for research purposes), increased requirements

pertaining to health data and pseudonymised (i.e., key-coded) data and additional obligations when we contract third party processors

in connection with the processing of the personal data.

The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data out

of the EEA, to the United States and other third countries.

Recent legal developments in Europe have created complexity and uncertainty

regarding transfers of personal data from the EEA to the United States, e.g.

on July 16, 2020, the Court of Justice of the European

Union (the “CJEU”) invalidated the E.U.-U.S.

Privacy Shield Framework, or the Privacy Shield, under which personal

data could be transferred from the EEA to U.S.

federal rules, regulations and guidance concerning data security for medical devices, including guidance from the FDA.

In addition, we may obtain health information from third parties (including research institutions from which we obtain clinical study data) that are subject to privacy and security requirements under HIPAA.

Depending on the facts and circumstances, we could be subject to criminal penalties if we knowingly obtain, use, or disclose individually identifiable health information maintained by a HIPAA-covered entity in a manner that is not authorized or permitted by HIPAA.

In addition, the California Consumer Privacy Act, or the CCPA, became effective on January 1, 2020.

The CCPA gives California residents expanded rights to access and delete their personal information, opt out of certain personal information sharing and receive detailed information about how their personal information is used by requiring covered companies to provide new disclosures to California consumers (as that term is broadly defined) and provide such consumers new ways to opt out of certain sales of personal information.

The CCPA provides for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action for data breaches that is expected to increase data breach litigation.

Although there are limited exemptions for certain health-related information, including certain clinical study data, the CCPA may increase our compliance costs and potential liability.

Further the California Privacy Rights Act, or the CPRA, recently passed in California.

The CPRA significantly amends the CCPA and will impose additional data protection obligations on covered businesses, including additional consumer rights processes, limitations on data uses, new audit requirements for higher risk data, and opt outs for certain uses of sensitive data.

It will also create a new California data protection agency authorized to issue substantive regulations and could result in increased privacy and information security enforcement.

The majority of the provisions will go into effect on January 1, 2023, and additional compliance investment and potential business process changes may be required.

Similar laws have passed in Virginia and Colorado, and have been proposed in other states and at the federal level, reflecting a trend toward more stringent privacy legislation in the United States.

The enactment of such laws could have potentially conflicting requirements that would make compliance challenging.

In the event that we are subject to or affected by HIPAA, the CCPA, the CPRA or other domestic privacy and data protection laws, any liability from failure to comply with the requirements of these laws could adversely affect our financial condition.

Foreign data protection laws, including the EU General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”), which became effective in May 2018, may also apply to health-related and other personal information obtained outside of the United States.

The GDPR imposes stringent data protection requirements for the processing of personal data in the EEA, including, for example, higher standards for obtaining consent from individuals to process their personal data, more robust disclosures to individuals and a strengthened individual data rights regime, shortened timelines for data breach notifications, limitations on retention and secondary use of information (including for research purposes), increased

requirements pertaining to health data and pseudonymised (i.e., key-coded) data and additional obligations when we contract third party processors in connection with the processing of the personal data.

The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data out of the EEA, to the United States and other third countries that have not been found to provide adequate protection to such personal data.

Recent legal developments in Europe have created complexity and uncertainty regarding transfers of personal data from the EEA to the United States, e.g.

on July 16, 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (the “CJEU”) invalidated the EU-U.S.

Privacy Shield Framework, or the Privacy Shield, under which personal data could be transferred from the EEA to U.S.

entities who had self-certified under the Privacy Shield scheme.

While the CJEU

upheld the adequacy of the standard contractual clauses (a standard form of contract approved by the European Commission as an

adequate personal data transfer mechanism, and potential alternative to the Privacy Shield), it made clear that reliance on them

alone may not necessarily be sufficient in all circumstances.

European data protection law provides that E.U.

and EEA member states

may make their own further laws and regulations limiting the processing of health-related data, which could limit our ability to

use and share personal data or could cause our costs to increase, and harm our business and financial condition.

Failure to comply

with the requirements of GDPR and the applicable national data protection and marketing laws may result in fines of up to €20,000,000

or up to 4% of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher, and other administrative

penalties as well as individual claims for compensation.

From January 1,

2021, we are subject to the GDPR and also the UK GDPR, which, together with the amended UK Data Protection Act 2018, retains the

GDPR in UK national law.

While the CJEU upheld the adequacy of the standard contractual clauses (a standard form of contract approved by the European Commission as an adequate personal data transfer mechanism, and potential alternative to the Privacy Shield), it made clear that reliance on them alone may not necessarily be sufficient in all circumstances.

Use of the standard contractual clauses must now be assessed on a case-by-case basis taking into account the legal regime applicable in the destination country, in particular applicable surveillance laws and rights of individuals and additional measures and/or contractual provisions may need to be put in place, however, the nature of these additional measures is currently uncertain.

The CJEU went on to state that if a competent supervisory authority believes that the standard contractual clauses cannot be complied with in the destination country and the required level of protection cannot be secured by other means, such supervisory authority is under an obligation to suspend or prohibit that transfer.

The European Commission issued revised standard contractual clauses on June 4, 2021 to account for the decision of the CJEU and recommendations made by the European Data Protection Board.

The revised standard contractual clauses must be used for relevant new data transfers from September 27, 2021;

existing standard contractual clauses arrangements must be migrated to the revised clauses by December 27, 2022.

There is some uncertainty around whether the revised clauses can be used for all types of data transfers, particularly whether they can be relied on for data transfers to non-EEA entities subject to the GDPR.

The revised standard contractual clauses apply only to the transfer of personal data outside of the EEA and not the United Kingdom;

the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office launched a public consultation on its draft revised data transfers mechanisms in August 2021.

As supervisory authorities issue further guidance on personal data export mechanisms, including circumstances where the standard contractual clauses cannot be used, and/or start taking enforcement action, we could suffer additional costs, complaints and/or regulatory investigations or fines, and/or if we are otherwise unable to transfer personal data between and among countries and regions in which we operate, it could affect the manner in which we provide our services, the geographical location or segregation of our relevant systems and operations, and could adversely affect our financial results.

European data protection law provides that EU and EEA member states may make their own further laws and regulations limiting the processing of health-related data, which could limit our ability to use and share personal data or could cause our costs to increase, and harm our business and financial condition.

Failure to comply with the requirements of GDPR and the applicable national data protection and marketing laws may result in fines of up to €20,000,000 or up to 4% of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher, and other administrative penalties as well as individual claims for compensation.

In addition to the foregoing, a breach of the GDPR could result in regulatory investigations, reputational damage, orders to cease/ change our processing of our data and/or enforcement notices.

We may also face civil claims including representative actions and other class action type litigation (where individuals have suffered harm), potentially amounting to significant compensation or damages liabilities, as well as associated costs, diversion of internal resources, and reputational harm.

From January 1, 2021, we are subject to the GDPR and also the UK GDPR, which, together with the amended UK Data Protection Act 2018, retains the GDPR in UK national law.

The UK GDPR mirrors the fines under the GDPR, e.g.

fines up to the greater of €20 million (£17.5

million) or 4% of global turnover.

The relationship between the UK and the European Union in relation to certain aspects of data

protection law remains unclear, and it is unclear how UK data protection laws and regulations will develop in the medium to longer

term, and how data transfers to and from the UK will be regulated in the long term.

These changes will lead to additional costs

and increase our overall risk exposure.

Currently there is a four to six-month grace period agreed in the TCA, ending June 30,

2021 at the latest, while the parties discuss an adequacy decision.

The European Commission published a draft adequacy decision

on 19 February 2021.

If adopted, the decision will enable data transfers from European Union member states to the UK for a four-year

period, subject to subsequent extensions.

Compliance with

and foreign privacy and security laws, rules and regulations could require us to take on more onerous obligations in our

contracts, require us to engage in costly compliance exercises, restrict our ability to collect, use and disclose data, or in

some cases, impact our ability, or the ability of our commercial partners, independent sales agents, suppliers or other business

partners, to operate in certain jurisdictions.

fines up to the greater of €20 million (£17.5 million) or 4% of global turnover.

The European Commission has adopted an adequacy decision in favor of the UK, enabling data transfers from EU member states to the UK without additional safeguards.

However, the UK adequacy decision will automatically expire in June 2025 unless the European Commission re-assesses and renews/ extends that decision and remains under review by the Commission during this period.

In September 2021, the UK government launched a consultation on its proposals for wide-ranging reform of UK data protection laws following Brexit.

There is a risk that any material changes which are made to the UK data protection regime could result in the European Commission reviewing the UK adequacy decision, and the UK losing its adequacy decision if the European Commission deems the UK to no longer provide adequate protection for personal data.

The relationship between the UK and the European Union in relation to certain aspects of data protection law remains unclear, and it is unclear how UK data protection laws and regulations will develop in the medium to longer term, and how data transfers to and from the UK will be regulated in the long term.

These changes will lead to additional costs and increase our overall risk exposure.

Compliance with U.S.

and foreign privacy and security laws, rules and regulations could require us to take on more onerous obligations in our contracts, require us to engage in costly compliance exercises, restrict our ability to collect, use and disclose data, or in some cases, impact our ability, or the ability of our commercial partners, independent sales agents, suppliers or other business partners, to operate in certain jurisdictions.

Each of these constantly evolving laws can be subject to varying interpretations.

Failure to comply with U.S.

and foreign data protection laws and regulations could result in government investigations and enforcement

actions (which could include civil or criminal penalties), fines, private litigation and/or adverse publicity and could negatively

affect our operating results and business.

Moreover, patients about whom we or our partners obtain information, as well as the

providers who share this information, may contractually limit our ability to use and disclose the information.

Claims that we

have violated individuals’

privacy rights, failed to comply with data protection laws, or breached our contractual obligations,

even if we are not found liable, could be expensive and time-consuming to defend and could result in adverse publicity that could

have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to

Intellectual Property

unable to obtain, maintain and adequately protect our intellectual property rights, our competitive position could be harmed or

we could be required to incur significant expenses to enforce or defend our rights.

Our commercial success

will depend in part on our success in obtaining and maintaining issued patents, trademarks and other intellectual property rights

in the United States and elsewhere and protecting our proprietary technology.

If we do not adequately protect our intellectual

property and proprietary technology, competitors may be able to use our technologies or the goodwill we have acquired in the marketplace

and erode or negate any competitive advantage we may have, which could harm our business and ability to achieve profitability.

Some of our intellectual

property rights depend on licensing agreements with third parties, and our patent coverage includes protection provided by licensed

If in the future we no longer have rights to one or more of these licensed patents, our patent coverage may be compromised,

which in turn could adversely affect our ability to protect our products and defend against competitors.

We have sought to

protect our proprietary position by filing patent applications in the United States and abroad related to our products that we

view as important to our business.

This process is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to file and prosecute all

necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner.

In addition, we cannot provide any assurances

that any of our patents have, or that any of our pending patent applications that mature into issued patents will include, claims

with a scope sufficient to protect our existing products, any enhancements we may develop to our existing products or any new products

we may develop or acquire and introduce in the future.

We, or our licensors, may fail to identify patentable aspects of inventions

made in the course of development and commercialization activities before it is too late to obtain patent protection on them.

we may miss potential opportunities to strengthen our patent position.

Other parties may have developed technologies that may be

related or competitive to our system, may have filed or may file patent applications and may have received or may receive patents

that overlap or conflict with our patent applications, either by claiming the same methods or devices or by claiming subject matter

that could dominate our patent position.

The patent positions

of regenerative medicine companies, including our patent position, may involve complex legal, scientific and factual questions,

and, therefore, the scope, validity, ownership and enforceability of any patent claims that we may obtain cannot be predicted with

and foreign data protection laws and regulations could result in government investigations and enforcement actions (which could include civil or criminal penalties), fines, private litigation and/or adverse publicity and could negatively affect our operating results and business.

Moreover, patients about whom we or our partners obtain information, as well as the providers who share this information, may contractually limit our ability to use and disclose the information.

Claims that we have violated individuals’ privacy rights, failed to comply with data protection laws, or breached our contractual obligations, even if we are not found liable, could be expensive and time-consuming to defend and could result in adverse publicity that could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

If we are unable to obtain, maintain and adequately protect our intellectual property rights, our competitive position could be harmed or we could be required to incur significant expenses to enforce or defend our rights.

Our commercial success will depend in part on our success in obtaining and maintaining issued patents, trademarks and other intellectual property rights in the United States and elsewhere and protecting our proprietary technology.

If we do not adequately protect our intellectual property and proprietary technology, competitors may be able to use our technologies or the goodwill we have acquired in the marketplace and erode or negate any competitive advantage we may have, which could harm our business and ability to achieve profitability.

Some of our intellectual property rights depend on licensing agreements with third parties, and our patent coverage includes protection provided by licensed patents.

If in the future we no longer have rights to one or more of these licensed patents, our patent coverage may be compromised, which in turn could adversely affect our ability to protect our products and defend against competitors.

We have sought to protect our proprietary position by filing patent applications in the United States and abroad related to our products that we view as important to our business.

This process is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner.

In addition, we cannot provide any assurances that any of our patents have, or that any of our pending patent applications that mature into issued patents will include, claims with a scope sufficient to protect our existing products, any enhancements we may develop to our existing products or any new products we may develop or acquire and introduce in the future.

We, or our licensors, may fail to identify patentable aspects of inventions made in the course of development and commercialization activities before it is too late to obtain patent protection on them.

Therefore, we may miss potential opportunities to strengthen our patent position.

Other parties may have developed technologies that may be related or competitive to our system, may have filed or may file patent applications and may have received or may receive patents that overlap or conflict with our patent applications, either by claiming the same methods or devices or by claiming subject matter that could dominate our patent position.

The patent positions of regenerative medicine companies, including our patent position, may involve complex legal, scientific and factual questions, and, therefore, the scope, validity, ownership and enforceability of any patent claims that we may obtain cannot be predicted with certainty.

Patents, if issued, may be challenged, deemed unenforceable, narrowed, invalidated or circumvented.

Proceedings challenging

our patents could result in either loss of the patent or denial of the patent application or loss or reduction in the scope of

one or more of the claims of the patent or patent application.

Proceedings challenging our patents could result in either loss of the patent or denial of the patent application or loss or reduction in the scope of one or more of the claims of the patent or patent application.

In addition, such proceedings may be costly.

Thus, any patents that

we currently own or may own may not provide any protection against competitors.

Furthermore, an adverse decision in an interference

proceeding can result in a third party receiving the patent right sought by us, which in turn could affect our ability to commercialize

our products.

Thus, any patents that we currently own or may own may not provide any protection against competitors.

Furthermore, an adverse decision in an interference proceeding can result in a third party receiving the patent right sought by us, which in turn could affect our ability to commercialize our products.

In recent years, patent rights have been the subject of significant litigation.

Changes in either the patent laws

or interpretation of the patent laws in the United States and other countries may diminish the value of our owned or licensed patents

or narrow the scope of our patent protection.

Though an issued patent

is presumed valid and enforceable, its issuance is not conclusive as to its inventorship, scope, validity or enforceability, and

it may not provide us with adequate proprietary protection or competitive advantages against competitors with similar products.

Competitors could attempt to replicate some or all of the competitive advantages we derive from our development efforts, willfully

infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate our intellectual property rights, design around our patents or develop and obtain

patent protection for more effective technologies, designs or methods.

CanGaroo and SimpliDerm

are the only current products covered by issued patents.

We rely on unpatented trade secrets and know-how for several of our current

products to develop and maintain our competitive position.

However, trade secrets and know-how can be difficult to protect and

enforce against third parties.

Accordingly, we cannot be certain that these intellectual property rights will provide us with adequate

protection or enable us to prevent third parties from developing or commercializing competitive products.

We may be unable to

prevent the unauthorized disclosure or use of our technical knowledge or trade secrets by consultants, suppliers, vendors, current

and former employees, distributors, commercial partners or independent sales agents.

The laws of some foreign countries do not

protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States, and we may encounter significant problems in

protecting our proprietary rights in these countries.

Our ability to enforce

our patent rights depends on our ability to detect infringement.

It may be difficult to detect infringers who do not advertise

the components that are used in their products.

Moreover, it may be difficult or impossible to obtain evidence of infringement

in a competitor’s or potential competitor’s product.

We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate and the damages

or other remedies awarded, if we were to prevail, may not be commercially meaningful.

In addition, proceedings

to enforce or defend our patents could put our patents at risk of being invalidated, held unenforceable or interpreted narrowly,

which could limit our ability to stop or prevent us from stopping others from using or commercializing similar or identical technology

and products, or limit the duration of the patent protection of our technology and products.

Such proceedings could provoke third

parties to assert claims against us, including that some or all of the claims in one or more of our patents are invalid or otherwise

unenforceable.

If any of the patents covering our products are narrowed, invalidated or found unenforceable, or if a court found

that valid, enforceable patents held by third parties covered one or more of our products, our competitive position could be harmed

or we could be required to incur significant expenses to enforce or defend our rights.

The degree of future

protection for our proprietary rights is uncertain, and we cannot ensure that:

any of our patents, or any of our pending patent applications, if issued, will include claims having

a scope sufficient to protect our products;

Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the United States and other countries may diminish the value of our owned or licensed patents or narrow the scope of our patent protection.

Though an issued patent is presumed valid and enforceable, its issuance is not conclusive as to its inventorship, scope, validity or enforceability, and it may not provide us with adequate proprietary protection or competitive advantages against competitors with similar products.

Competitors could attempt to replicate some or all of the competitive advantages we derive from our development efforts, willfully infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate our intellectual property rights, design around our patents or develop and obtain patent protection for more effective technologies, designs or methods.

CanGaroo and SimpliDerm are the only current products covered by issued patents.

We rely on unpatented trade secrets and know-how for several of our current products to develop and maintain our competitive position.

However, trade secrets and know-how can be difficult to protect and enforce against third parties.

Accordingly, we cannot be certain that these intellectual property rights will provide us with adequate protection or enable us to prevent third parties from developing or commercializing competitive products.

We may be unable to prevent the unauthorized disclosure or use of our technical knowledge or trade secrets by consultants, suppliers, vendors, current and former employees, distributors, commercial partners or independent sales agents.

The laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States, and we may encounter significant problems in protecting our proprietary rights in these countries.

Our ability to enforce our patent rights depends on our ability to detect infringement.

It may be difficult to detect infringers who do not advertise the components that are used in their products.

Moreover, it may be difficult or impossible to obtain evidence of infringement in a competitor’s or potential competitor’s product.

We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate and the damages or other remedies awarded, if we were to prevail, may not be commercially meaningful.

In addition, proceedings to enforce or defend our patents could put our patents at risk of being invalidated, held unenforceable or interpreted narrowly, which could limit our ability to stop or prevent us from stopping others from using or commercializing similar or identical technology and products, or limit the duration of the patent protection of our technology and products.

Such proceedings could provoke third parties to assert claims against us, including that some or all of the claims in one or more of our patents are invalid or otherwise unenforceable.

If any of the patents covering our products are narrowed, invalidated or found unenforceable, or if a court found that valid, enforceable patents held by third parties covered one or more of our products, our competitive position could be harmed or we could be required to incur significant expenses to enforce or defend our rights.

The degree of future protection for our proprietary rights is uncertain, and we cannot ensure that:

● any of our patents, or any of our pending patent applications, if issued, will include claims having a scope sufficient to protect our products;

● any of our pending patent applications will issue as patents;

we will be able to successfully commercialize our products on a substantial scale, if approved,

before the relevant patents we currently have, or may have, expire;

we were the first to conceive and reduce to practice the inventions covered by each of our patents

and pending patent applications;

● we will be able to successfully commercialize our products on a substantial scale, if approved, before the relevant patents we currently have, or may have, expire;

● we were the first to conceive and reduce to practice the inventions covered by each of our patents and pending patent applications;

● we were the first to file patent applications for these inventions;

others will not develop similar or alternative technologies that do not infringe, misappropriate

or otherwise violate our owned or licensed patents and other intellectual property rights;

● others will not develop similar or alternative technologies that do not infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate our owned or licensed patents and other intellectual property rights;

● any of our patents will ultimately be found to be valid and enforceable;

● ownership of our patents or patent applications will not be challenged by third parties;

any patents issued to us will provide a basis for an exclusive market for our commercially viable

products, will provide us with any competitive advantages or will not be challenged by third parties;

our competitors will not conduct research and development activities in countries where we do not

have patent rights, or in countries where research and development safe harbor laws exist, and then use the information learned

from such activities to develop competitive products for sale in our major commercial markets;

● any patents issued to us will provide a basis for an exclusive market for our commercially viable products, will provide us with any competitive advantages or will not be challenged by third parties;

● our competitors will not conduct research and development activities in countries where we do not have patent rights, or in countries where research and development safe harbor laws exist, and then use the information learned from such activities to develop competitive products for sale in our major commercial markets;

● we will develop additional proprietary technologies or products that are separately patentable;

our commercial activities or products will not infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate the

patents and other intellectual property rights of others.

Should any of these events occur, they could have a material and adverse effect on our business,

financial condition and results of operations.

enter into invention assignment and confidentiality agreements with all of our employees and contractors and such agreements could

be ineffective or breached.

We rely, in part,

upon unpatented trade secrets, unpatented know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our competitive

position, which we seek to protect, in part, by confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, independent sales agents,

collaborators and third-party vendors.

We also seek to enter agreements with our employees and consultants that obligate them to

assign any inventions created during their work for us to us and have non-compete agreements with some, but not all, of our consultants.

However, we may not obtain these agreements in all circumstances and the assignment of intellectual property under such agreements

may not be self-executing.

If the employees, consultants or collaborators that are parties to these agreements breach or violate

their respective terms, we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach or violation.

It is possible that technology relevant

to our business will be independently developed by a person that is not a party to such an agreement.

Furthermore, if the employees

and consultants who are parties to these agreements breach or violate the terms of these agreements, we may not have adequate remedies

for any such breach or violation, and we could lose our trade secrets through such breaches or violations.

Further, our trade secrets

could otherwise become known or be independently discovered by our competitors.

Any of the foregoing could have a material and

adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

protection we obtain for our products may not be sufficient enough to provide us with any competitive advantage or our patents

may be challenged.

Our owned and licensed

patents and pending patent applications, if issued, may not provide us with any meaningful protection or prevent competitors from

designing around our patent claims to circumvent our patents by developing similar or alternative technologies or products in a

non-infringing manner.

For example, a third party may develop a competitive product that provides benefits similar to one or more

of our products but falls outside the scope of our patent protection or license rights.

If the patent protection provided by the

patents and patent applications we hold or pursue with respect to our products is not sufficiently broad to impede such competition,

our ability to successfully commercialize our products could be negatively affected, which would harm our business.

It is possible that

defects of form in the preparation or filing of our patents or patent applications may exist, or may arise in the future, for example

with respect to proper priority claims, inventorship, claim scope, or requests for patent term adjustments.

If we or our collaborators

or licensors, fail to establish, maintain or protect such patents and other intellectual property rights, such rights may be reduced

or eliminated.

If our collaborators or licensors are not fully cooperative or disagree with us as to the prosecution, maintenance

or enforcement of any patent rights, such patent rights could be compromised.

If there are material defects in the form, preparation,

prosecution or enforcement of our patents or patent applications, such patents may be invalid and/or unenforceable, and such applications

may never result in valid and enforceable patents.

Any of these outcomes could impair our ability to prevent competition from third

parties, which may have an adverse impact on our business.

Pending patent applications

cannot be enforced against third parties practicing the technology claimed in such applications unless and until a patent issues

from such applications.

Assuming the other requirements for patentability are met, currently, the first to file a patent application

is generally entitled to the patent.

However, prior to March 16, 2013, in the United States, the first to invent was entitled to

Publications of discoveries in the scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent applications

in the United States and other jurisdictions are not published until 18 months after filing, or in some cases not at all.

we cannot be certain that we were the first to make the inventions claimed in our patents or pending patent applications, or that

we were the first to file for patent protection of such inventions.

Similarly, we cannot be certain that parties from whom we do

or may license or purchase patent rights were the first to make relevant claimed inventions, or were the first to file for patent

protection for them.

If third parties have filed prior patent applications on inventions claimed in our patents or applications

that were filed on or before March 15, 2013, an interference proceeding in the United States can be initiated by such third parties

to determine who was the first to invent any of the subject matter covered by the patent claims of our applications.

If third parties

have filed such prior applications after March 15, 2013, a derivation proceeding in the United States can be initiated by such

third parties to determine whether our invention was derived from theirs.

Moreover, because

the issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its inventorship, scope, validity or enforceability, our owned and licensed patents

or pending patent applications may be challenged in the courts or patent offices in the United States and abroad.

There is no assurance

that all of the potentially relevant prior art relating to our patents and patent applications has been found.

If such prior art

exists, it may be used to invalidate a patent, or may prevent a patent from issuing from a pending patent application.

such patent filings may be subject to a third-party submission of prior art to the U.S.

Patent and Trademark Office (the “USPTO”)

or to other patent offices around the world.

Alternately or additionally, we may become involved in post-grant review procedures,

oppositions, derivation proceedings, ex parte reexaminations, inter partes review, supplemental examinations or interference proceedings

or challenges in district court, in the United States or in various foreign patent offices, including both national and regional,

challenging patents or patent applications in which we have rights, including patents on which we rely to protect our business.

● our commercial activities or products will not infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate the patents and other intellectual property rights of others.

● Should any of these events occur, they could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may not enter into invention assignment and confidentiality agreements with all of our employees and contractors and such agreements could be ineffective or breached.

We rely, in part, upon unpatented trade secrets, unpatented know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our competitive position, which we seek to protect, in part, by confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, independent sales agents, collaborators and third-party vendors.

We also seek to enter agreements with our employees and consultants that obligate them to assign any inventions created during their work for us to us and have non-compete agreements with some, but not all, of our consultants.

However, we may not obtain these agreements in all circumstances and the assignment of intellectual property under such agreements may not be self-executing.

If the employees, consultants or collaborators that are parties to these agreements breach or violate their respective terms, we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach or violation.

It is possible that technology relevant to our business will be independently developed by a person that is not a party to such an agreement.

Furthermore, if the employees and consultants who are parties to these agreements breach or violate the terms of these agreements, we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach or violation, and we could lose our trade secrets through such breaches or violations.

Further, our trade secrets could otherwise become known or be independently discovered by our competitors.

Any of the foregoing could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The patent protection we obtain for our products may not be sufficient enough to provide us with any competitive advantage or our patents may be challenged.

Our owned and licensed patents and pending patent applications, if issued, may not provide us with any meaningful protection or prevent competitors from designing around our patent claims to circumvent our patents by developing similar or alternative technologies or products in a non-infringing manner.

For example, a third party may develop a competitive product that provides benefits similar to one or more of our products but falls outside the scope of our patent protection or license rights.

If the patent protection provided by the patents and patent applications we hold or pursue with respect to our products is not sufficiently broad to impede such competition, our ability to successfully commercialize our products could be negatively affected, which would harm our business.

It is possible that defects of form in the preparation or filing of our patents or patent applications may exist, or may arise in the future, for example with respect to proper priority claims, inventorship, claim scope, or requests for patent term adjustments.

If we or our collaborators or licensors, fail to establish, maintain or protect such patents and other intellectual property rights, such rights may be reduced or eliminated.

If our collaborators or licensors are not fully cooperative or disagree with us as to the prosecution, maintenance or enforcement of any patent rights, such patent rights could be compromised.

If there are material defects in the form, preparation, prosecution or enforcement of our patents or patent applications, such patents may be invalid and/or unenforceable, and such applications may never result in valid and enforceable patents.

Any of these outcomes could impair our ability to prevent competition from third parties, which may have an adverse impact on our business.

Pending patent applications cannot be enforced against third parties practicing the technology claimed in such applications unless and until a patent issues from such applications.

Assuming the other requirements for patentability are met, currently, the first to file a patent application is generally entitled to the patent.

However, prior to March 16, 2013, in the United States, the first to invent was entitled to the patent.

Publications of discoveries in the scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent applications in the United States and other jurisdictions are not published until 18 months after filing, or in some cases not at all.

Therefore, we cannot be certain that we were the first to make the inventions claimed in our patents or pending patent applications, or that we were the first to file for patent protection of such inventions.

Similarly, we cannot be certain that parties from whom we do or may license or purchase patent rights were the first to make relevant claimed inventions, or were the first to file for patent protection for them.

If third parties have filed prior patent applications on inventions claimed in our patents or applications that were filed on or before March 15, 2013, an interference proceeding in the United States can be initiated by such third parties to determine who was the first to invent any of the subject matter covered by the patent claims of our applications.

If third parties have filed such prior applications after March 15, 2013, a derivation proceeding in the United States can be initiated by such third parties to determine whether our invention was derived from theirs.

Moreover, because the issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its inventorship, scope, validity or enforceability, our owned and licensed patents or pending patent applications may be challenged in the courts or patent offices in the United States and abroad.

There is no assurance that all of the potentially relevant prior art relating to our patents and patent applications has been found.

If such prior art exists, it may be used to invalidate a patent, or may prevent a patent from issuing from a pending patent application.

For example, such patent filings may be subject to a third-party submission of prior art to the U.S.

Patent and Trademark Office (the “USPTO”) or to other patent offices around the world.

Alternately or additionally, we may become involved in post-grant review procedures, oppositions, derivation proceedings, ex parte reexaminations, inter partes review, supplemental examinations or interference proceedings or challenges in district court, in the United States or in various foreign patent offices, including both national and regional, challenging patents or patent applications in which we have rights, including patents on which we rely to protect our business.

In addition, if we seek to enforce our patents against third parties, third parties may initiate such challenges in response.

adverse determination in any such challenges may result in loss of the patent or in patent or patent application claims being narrowed,

invalidated or held unenforceable, in whole or in part, or in denial of the patent application or loss or reduction in the scope

of one or more claims of the patent or patent application, any of which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing

similar or identical technology and products, or limit the duration of the patent protection of our technology and products.

addition, given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents

protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized.

Any of the foregoing could

have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

or other proceedings or third-party claims of intellectual property infringement, misappropriation or other violations could require

us to spend significant time and money, prevent us from selling our products and adversely affect our stock price.

Our commercial success

will depend in part on not infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating the patents or other proprietary rights of third

An adverse determination in any such challenges may result in loss of the patent or in patent or patent application claims being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable, in whole or in part, or in denial of the patent application or loss or reduction in the scope of one or more claims of the patent or patent application, any of which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar or identical technology and products, or limit the duration of the patent protection of our technology and products.

In addition, given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized.

Any of the foregoing could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Litigation or other proceedings or third-party claims of intellectual property infringement, misappropriation or other violations could require us to spend significant time and money, prevent us from selling our products and adversely affect our stock price.

Our commercial success will depend in part on not infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating the patents or other proprietary rights of third parties.

Significant litigation regarding patent rights occurs in our industry.

Our competitors in both the United States and abroad,

many of which have substantially greater resources and have made substantial investments in patent portfolios and competing technologies,

may have applied for or obtained or may in the future apply for and obtain, patents that will prevent, limit or otherwise interfere

with our ability to make, use and sell our products.

Our competitors in both the United States and abroad, many of which have substantially greater resources and have made substantial investments in patent portfolios and competing technologies, may have applied for or obtained or may in the future apply for and obtain, patents that will prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with our ability to make, use and sell our products.

We do not always conduct independent reviews of patents issued to third parties.

In addition, patent applications in the United States and elsewhere can be pending for many years before issuance, or unintentionally

abandoned patents or applications can be revived, so there may be applications of others now pending or recently revived patents

of which we are unaware.

These applications may later result in issued patents, or the revival of previously abandoned patents,

that will prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with our ability to make, use or sell our products.

Third parties may, in the future,

assert claims that we are employing their proprietary technology without authorization, including claims from competitors or from

non-practicing entities that have no relevant product sales and against whom our own patent portfolio may have no deterrent effect.

As we continue to commercialize our products in their current or updated forms, launch new products and enter new markets, we expect

competitors may claim that one or more of our products infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate their intellectual property

rights as part of business strategies designed to impede our successful commercialization and entry into new markets.

number of patents, the rapid rate of new patent applications and issuances, the complexities of the technology involved and the

uncertainty of litigation may increase the risk of business resources and management’s attention being diverted to patent

We may in the future receive letters or other threats or claims from third parties inviting us to take licenses under,

or alleging that we infringe, their patents.

Moreover, we may become

party to future adversarial proceedings regarding our patent portfolio or the patents of third parties.

Such proceedings could

include supplemental examination or contested post-grant proceedings, such as review, reexamination, inter parties review, interference

or derivation proceedings before the USPTO and challenges in U.S.

In addition, patent applications in the United States and elsewhere can be pending for many years before issuance, or unintentionally abandoned patents or applications can be revived, so there may be applications of others now pending or recently revived patents of which we are unaware.

These applications may later result in issued patents, or the revival of previously abandoned patents, that will prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with our ability to make, use or sell our products.

Third parties may, in the future, assert claims that we are employing their proprietary technology without authorization, including claims from competitors or from non-practicing entities that have no relevant product sales and against whom our own patent portfolio may have no deterrent effect.

As we continue to commercialize our products in their current or updated forms, launch new products and enter new markets, we expect competitors may claim that one or more of our products infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate their intellectual property rights as part of business strategies designed to impede our successful

commercialization and entry into new markets.

The large number of patents, the rapid rate of new patent applications and issuances, the complexities of the technology involved and the uncertainty of litigation may increase the risk of business resources and management’s attention being diverted to patent litigation.

We may in the future receive letters or other threats or claims from third parties inviting us to take licenses under, or alleging that we infringe, their patents.

Moreover, we may become party to future adversarial proceedings regarding our patent portfolio or the patents of third parties.

Such proceedings could include supplemental examination or contested post-grant proceedings, such as review, reexamination, inter parties review, interference or derivation proceedings before the USPTO and challenges in U.S.

District Court.

Patents may be subjected to opposition, post-grant

review or comparable proceedings lodged in various foreign, both national and regional, patent offices.

The legal threshold for

initiating litigation or contested proceedings may be low, so that even lawsuits or proceedings with a low probability of success

might be initiated.

Litigation and contested proceedings can also be expensive and time-consuming, and our adversaries in these

proceedings may have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to prosecuting these legal actions than we can.

may also occasionally use these proceedings to challenge the patent rights of others.

We cannot be certain that any particular

challenge will be successful in limiting or eliminating the challenged patent rights of the third party.

Any lawsuits resulting

from such allegations could subject us to significant liability for damages and/or invalidate our proprietary rights.

Any potential

intellectual property litigation also could force us to do one or more of the following:

stop making, selling or using products or technologies that allegedly infringe, misappropriate

or otherwise violate the asserted intellectual property;

lose the opportunity to license our technology to others or to collect royalty payments based upon

successful protection and assertion of our intellectual property rights against others;

Patents may be subjected to opposition, post-grant review or comparable proceedings lodged in various foreign, both national and regional, patent offices.

The legal threshold for initiating litigation or contested proceedings may be low, so that even lawsuits or proceedings with a low probability of success might be initiated.

Litigation and contested proceedings can also be expensive and time-consuming, and our adversaries in these proceedings may have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to prosecuting these legal actions than we can.

We may also occasionally use these proceedings to challenge the patent rights of others.

We cannot be certain that any particular challenge will be successful in limiting or eliminating the challenged patent rights of the third party.

Any lawsuits resulting from such allegations could subject us to significant liability for damages and/or invalidate our proprietary rights.

Any potential intellectual property litigation also could force us to do one or more of the following:

stop making, selling or using products or technologies that allegedly infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate the asserted intellectual property;

● lose the opportunity to license our technology to others or to collect royalty payments based upon successful protection and assertion of our intellectual property rights against others;

● incur significant legal expenses;

pay substantial damages or royalties to the party whose intellectual property rights we may be

found to be infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating;

pay the attorney’s fees and costs of litigation to the party whose intellectual property

rights we may be found to be infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating;

redesign those products that contain the allegedly infringing intellectual property, which could

be costly, disruptive and infeasible;

attempt to obtain a license to the relevant intellectual property from third parties, which may

not be available on reasonable terms or at all, or from third parties who may attempt to license rights that they do not have.

Any litigation or

claim against us, even those without merit, may cause us to incur substantial costs, and could place a significant strain on our

financial resources, divert the attention of management from our core business and harm our reputation.

If we are found to infringe,

misappropriate or otherwise violate the intellectual property rights of third parties, we could be required to pay substantial

damages (possibly treble damages) and/or substantial royalties and could be prevented from selling our products unless we obtain

a license or are able to redesign our products to avoid infringement, misappropriation or violation.

Any such license may not be

available on reasonable terms, if at all, and there can be no assurance that we would be able to redesign our products in a way

that would not infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate the intellectual property rights of others.

We could encounter delays

in product introductions while we attempt to develop alternative methods or products.

If we fail to obtain any required licenses

or make any necessary changes to our products or technologies, we may have to withdraw existing products from the market or may

be unable to commercialize one or more of our products.

In addition, we generally

indemnify our customers with respect to infringement by our products of the proprietary rights of third parties.

Third parties

may assert infringement claims against our customers.

These claims may require us to initiate or defend protracted and costly litigation

on behalf of our customers, regardless of the merits of these claims.

If any of these claims succeed or settle, we may be forced

to pay damages or settlement payments on behalf of our customers or may be required to obtain licenses for the products they use.

● pay substantial damages or royalties to the party whose intellectual property rights we may be found to be infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating;

● pay the attorney’s fees and costs of litigation to the party whose intellectual property rights we may be found to be infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating;

● redesign those products that contain the allegedly infringing intellectual property, which could be costly, disruptive and infeasible;

● attempt to obtain a license to the relevant intellectual property from third parties, which may not be available on reasonable terms or at all, or from third parties who may attempt to license rights that they do not have.

Any litigation or claim against us, even those without merit, may cause us to incur substantial costs, and could place a significant strain on our financial resources, divert the attention of management from our core business and harm our reputation.

If we are found to infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate the intellectual property rights of third parties, we could be required to pay substantial damages (possibly treble damages) and/or substantial royalties and could be prevented from selling our products unless we obtain a license or are able to redesign our products to avoid infringement, misappropriation or violation.

Any such license may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all, and there can be no assurance that we would be able to redesign our products in a way that would not infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate the intellectual property rights of others.

We could encounter delays in product introductions while we attempt to develop alternative methods or products.

If we fail to obtain any required licenses or make any necessary changes to our products or technologies, we may have to withdraw existing products from the market or may be unable to commercialize one or more of our products.

In addition, we generally indemnify our customers with respect to infringement by our products of the proprietary rights of third parties.

Third parties may assert infringement claims against our customers.

These claims may require us to

initiate or defend protracted and costly litigation on behalf of our customers, regardless of the merits of these claims.

If any of these claims succeed or settle, we may be forced to pay damages or settlement payments on behalf of our customers or may be required to obtain licenses for the products they use.

If we cannot obtain all necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms, our customers may be forced to stop using our products.

We may not have sufficient

resources to bring these actions to a successful conclusion.

There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings,

motions or other interim proceedings or developments.

If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative,

it could have a material adverse effect on the market price of shares of our Class A common stock.

Any of the foregoing could have

a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position could be harmed.

In addition to patent

protection, we also rely upon copyright and trade secret protection, as well as non-disclosure agreements and invention assignment

agreements with our employees, consultants, independent sales agents and other third parties, to protect our confidential and proprietary

In addition to contractual measures, we try to protect the confidential nature of our proprietary information using

commonly accepted physical and technological security measures.

Such measures may not, for example, in the case of misappropriation

of a trade secret by an employee or third party with authorized access, provide adequate protection for our proprietary information.

Our security measures may not prevent an employee or consultant from misappropriating our trade secrets and providing them to a

competitor, and recourse we take against such misconduct may not provide an adequate remedy to protect our interests fully.

parties may also attempt to copy or reverse engineer certain aspects of our products that we consider proprietary.

claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret can be difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the

outcome is unpredictable.

Even though we use commonly accepted security measures, trade secret violations are often a matter of

state law, and the criteria for protection of trade secrets can vary among different jurisdictions.

In addition, trade secrets

may be independently developed by others in a manner that could prevent legal recourse by us.

If any of our confidential or proprietary

information, such as our trade secrets, were to be disclosed or misappropriated, or if any such information was independently developed

by a competitor, it could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

unable to enforce our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

Obtaining, maintaining

and enforcing intellectual property rights is expensive and it is cost prohibitive to do so throughout the world.

we may determine not to obtain, maintain or enforce intellectual property rights in certain jurisdictions.

In addition, the laws

of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States.

companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in certain foreign jurisdictions.

This could make it difficult for us to stop infringement of our foreign patents, if obtained, or the misappropriation or other

violation of our other intellectual property rights.

For example, some foreign countries have compulsory licensing laws under which

a patent owner must grant licenses to third parties.

In addition, some countries limit the enforceability of patents against third

parties, including government agencies or government contractors.

We may not have sufficient resources to bring these actions to a successful conclusion.

There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments.

If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a material adverse effect on the market price of shares of our Class A common stock.

Any of the foregoing could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position could be harmed.

In addition to patent protection, we also rely upon copyright and trade secret protection, as well as non-disclosure agreements and invention assignment agreements with our employees, consultants, independent sales agents and other third parties, to protect our confidential and proprietary information.

In addition to contractual measures, we try to protect the confidential nature of our proprietary information using commonly accepted physical and technological security measures.

Such measures may not, for example, in the case of misappropriation of a trade secret by an employee or third party with authorized access, provide adequate protection for our proprietary information.

Our security measures may not prevent an employee or consultant from misappropriating our trade secrets and providing them to a competitor, and recourse we take against such misconduct may not provide an adequate remedy to protect our interests fully.

Unauthorized parties may also attempt to copy or reverse engineer certain aspects of our products that we consider proprietary.

Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret can be difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable.

Even though we use commonly accepted security measures, trade secret violations are often a matter of state law, and the criteria for protection of trade secrets can vary among different jurisdictions.

In addition, trade secrets may be independently developed by others in a manner that could prevent legal recourse by us.

If any of our confidential or proprietary information, such as our trade secrets, were to be disclosed or misappropriated, or if any such information was independently developed by a competitor, it could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be unable to enforce our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

Obtaining, maintaining and enforcing intellectual property rights is expensive and it is cost prohibitive to do so throughout the world.

Accordingly, we may determine not to obtain, maintain or enforce intellectual property rights in certain jurisdictions.

In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States.

Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in certain foreign jurisdictions.

This could make it difficult for us to stop infringement of our foreign patents, if obtained, or the misappropriation or other violation of our other intellectual property rights.

For example, some foreign countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner must grant licenses to third parties.

In addition, some countries limit the enforceability of patents against third parties, including government agencies or government contractors.

In these countries, patents may provide limited or no benefit.

Patent protection must ultimately be sought on a country-by-country basis, which is an expensive and time-consuming process with

uncertain outcomes.

Accordingly, we may choose not to seek patent protection in certain countries, and we will not have the benefit

of patent protection in such countries.

Proceedings to enforce

our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects

of our business.

Patent protection must ultimately be sought on a country-by-country basis, which is an expensive and time-consuming process with uncertain outcomes.

Accordingly, we may choose not to seek patent protection in certain countries, and we will not have the benefit of patent protection in such countries.

Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business.

Accordingly, our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights in such countries may be inadequate.

changes in the law and legal decisions by courts in the United States and foreign countries may affect our ability to obtain adequate

protection for our technology and the enforcement of our intellectual property.

Any of the foregoing could have a material and

adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Third parties

may assert ownership or commercial rights to inventions we develop.

Third parties may

in the future make claims challenging the inventorship or ownership of our intellectual property.

We have written agreements with

collaborators that provide for the ownership of intellectual property arising from our collaborations.

In addition, we may face

claims by third parties that our agreements with employees, contractors or consultants obligating them to assign intellectual property

to us are ineffective or in conflict with prior or competing contractual obligations of assignment, which could result in ownership

disputes regarding intellectual property we have developed or will develop and interfere with our ability to capture the commercial

value of such intellectual property.

Litigation may be necessary to resolve an ownership dispute, and if we are not successful,

we may be precluded from using certain intellectual property or may lose our exclusive rights in such intellectual property.

outcome could harm our business and competitive position.

Any of the foregoing could have a material and adverse effect on our

business, financial condition and results of operations.

Third parties

may assert that our employees or consultants have wrongfully used or disclosed confidential information or misappropriated trade

We employ individuals

who previously worked with other companies, including our competitors or potential competitors.

Although we try to ensure that

our employees and consultants do not use the proprietary information or know-how of others in their work for us, we may be subject

to claims that we or our employees, consultants or independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed intellectual

property or personal data, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of a former employer or other third party.

In addition, changes in the law and legal decisions by courts in the United States and foreign countries may affect our ability to obtain adequate protection for our technology and the enforcement of our intellectual property.

Any of the foregoing could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Third parties may assert ownership or commercial rights to inventions we develop.

Third parties may in the future make claims challenging the inventorship or ownership of our intellectual property.

We have written agreements with collaborators that provide for the ownership of intellectual property arising from our collaborations.

In addition, we may face claims by third parties that our agreements with employees, contractors or consultants obligating them to assign intellectual property to us are ineffective or in conflict with prior or competing contractual obligations of assignment, which could result in ownership disputes regarding intellectual property we have developed or will develop and interfere with our ability to capture the commercial value of such intellectual property.

Litigation may be necessary to resolve an ownership dispute, and if we are not successful, we may be precluded from using certain intellectual property or may lose our exclusive rights in such intellectual property.

Either outcome could harm our business and competitive position.

Any of the foregoing could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Third parties may assert that our employees or consultants have wrongfully used or disclosed confidential information or misappropriated trade secrets.

We employ individuals who previously worked with other companies, including our competitors or potential competitors.

Although we try to ensure that our employees and consultants do not use the proprietary information or know-how of others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or our employees, consultants or independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed intellectual property or personal data, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of a former employer or other third party.

Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims.

If we fail in defending any such claims or settling those claims, in

addition to paying monetary damages or a settlement payment, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel.

if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management

and other employees.

Any of the foregoing could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results

of operations.

Recent changes

If we fail in defending any such claims or settling those claims, in addition to paying monetary damages or a settlement payment, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel.

Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.

Any of the foregoing could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Recent changes in U.S.

patent laws may limit our ability to obtain, defend and/or enforce our patents.

Recent patent reform

legislation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement

or defense of our issued patents.

The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or the Leahy-Smith Act, includes a number of significant

changes to U.S.

These include provisions that affect the way patent applications are prosecuted and also affect patent

The USPTO recently developed new regulations and procedures to govern administration of the Leahy-Smith Act, and many

of the substantive changes to patent law associated with the Leahy-Smith Act, and in particular, the first to file provisions,

which became effective on March 16, 2013, could affect us.

The first to file provisions limit the rights of an inventor to patent

an invention if the inventor was not the first to file an application for patenting that invention, even if such invention was

the first invention.

Recent patent reform legislation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents.

The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or the Leahy-Smith Act, includes a number of significant changes to U.S.

These include provisions that affect the way patent applications are prosecuted and also affect patent litigation.

The USPTO recently developed new regulations and procedures to govern administration of the Leahy-Smith Act, and many of the substantive changes to patent law associated with the Leahy-Smith Act, and in particular, the first to file provisions, which became effective on March 16, 2013, could affect us.

The first to file provisions limit the rights of an inventor to patent an invention if the inventor was not the first to file an application for patenting that invention, even if such invention was the first invention.

Accordingly, it is not clear what, if any, impact the Leahy-Smith Act will have on the operation of our business.

This will require us to be cognizant going forward of the timing from invention to filing of a patent application and be diligent

in filing patent applications, but circumstances could prevent us from promptly filing patent applications on our inventions.

In addition, the Leahy-Smith

Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the enforcement and defense of our issued patents.

For example, the Leahy-Smith Act provides that an administrative tribunal known as the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (the “PTAB”)

provides a venue for challenging the validity of patents at a cost that is much lower than district court litigation and on timelines

that are much faster.

This will require us to be cognizant going forward of the timing from invention to filing of a patent application and be diligent in filing patent applications, but circumstances could prevent us from promptly filing patent applications on our inventions.

In addition, the Leahy-Smith Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the enforcement and defense of our issued patents.

For example, the Leahy-Smith Act provides that an administrative tribunal known as the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (the “PTAB”) provides a venue for challenging the validity of patents at a cost that is much lower than district court litigation and on timelines that are much faster.

This applies to all of our U.S.

patents, even those issued before March 16, 2013.

Furthermore, because of

a lower evidentiary standard in USPTO proceedings compared to the evidentiary standard in U.S.

federal courts necessary to invalidate

a patent claim, a third party could potentially provide evidence in a USPTO proceeding sufficient for the USPTO to hold a claim

invalid even though the same evidence would be insufficient to invalidate the claim if first presented in a district court action.

Although it is not clear what, if any, long-term impact the PTAB proceedings will have on the operation of our business, patent

challenge proceedings before the PTAB since its inception in 2013 have resulted in the invalidation of many U.S.

Furthermore, because of a lower evidentiary standard in USPTO proceedings compared to the evidentiary standard in U.S.

federal courts necessary to invalidate a patent claim, a third party could potentially provide evidence in a USPTO proceeding sufficient for the USPTO to hold a claim invalid even though the same evidence would be insufficient to invalidate the claim if first presented in a district court action.

Although it is not clear what, if any, long-term impact the PTAB proceedings will have on the operation of our business, patent challenge proceedings before the PTAB since its inception in 2013 have resulted in the invalidation of many U.S.

patent claims.

The availability of the PTAB as a lower-cost, faster and potentially more potent tribunal for challenging patents could increase

the likelihood that our own patents will be challenged, thereby increasing the uncertainties and costs of maintaining and enforcing

Any failure by us to adequately address the uncertainties and costs surrounding recent patent legislation could have a material

and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

and maintaining our patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other

requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance

with these requirements.

Periodic maintenance

and annuity fees on any issued patent are due to be paid to the USPTO and European and other patent agencies over the lifetime

In addition, the USPTO and European and other patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary,

fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process.

While an inadvertent failure to make payment of

such fees or to comply with such provisions can in many cases be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance

with the applicable rules, there are situations in which such noncompliance will result in the abandonment or lapse of the patent

or patent application, and the partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction.

Non-compliance events that

could result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application include failure to respond to official actions within prescribed

time limits, non-payment of fees and failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents within prescribed time limits.

we or our licensors fail to maintain the patents and patent applications covering our product candidates or if we or our licensors

otherwise allow our patents or patent applications to be abandoned or lapse, our competitors might be able to enter the market,

which would hurt our competitive position, could impair our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates in any

indication for which they are approved, and could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results

of operations.

In addition, any of

the intellectual property rights that we own or license that are developed through the use of U.S.

government funding will be subject

to additional federal regulations.

Pursuant to the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 (the “Bayh-Dole Act”), the government will

receive a license under inventions developed under a government-funded program and may require us to manufacture products embodying

such inventions in the United States.

Under certain circumstances, the government may also claim ownership in such inventions or

compel us to license them to third parties.

Any failure by us to comply with federal regulations regarding intellectual property

rights that were developed through the use of U.S.

government funding could have a material and adverse effect on our business,

financial condition and results of operations.

not obtain patent term extension in the United States under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments and in foreign countries under similar

legislation, thereby potentially extending the term of marketing exclusivity for our product candidates, our business may be materially

Patents have a limited

In the United States, if all maintenance fees are timely paid, the natural expiration of a patent is generally 20 years

from its earliest U.S.

The availability of the PTAB as a lower-cost, faster and potentially more potent tribunal for challenging patents could increase the likelihood that our own patents will be challenged, thereby increasing the uncertainties and costs of maintaining and enforcing them.

Any failure by us to adequately address the uncertainties and costs surrounding recent patent legislation could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Obtaining and maintaining our patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.

Periodic maintenance and annuity fees on any issued patent are due to be paid to the USPTO and European and other patent agencies over the lifetime of a patent.

In addition, the USPTO and European and other patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process.

While an inadvertent failure to make payment of such fees or to comply with such provisions can in many cases be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations in which such noncompliance will result in the abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, and the partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction.

Non-compliance events that could result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application include failure to respond to official actions within prescribed time limits, non-payment of fees and failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents within prescribed time limits.

If we or our licensors fail to maintain the patents and patent applications covering our product candidates or if we or our licensors otherwise allow our patents or patent applications to be abandoned or lapse, our competitors might be able to enter the market, which would hurt our competitive position, could impair our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates in any indication for which they are approved, and could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, any of the intellectual property rights that we own or license that are developed through the use of U.S.

government funding will be subject to additional federal regulations.

Pursuant to the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 (the “Bayh-Dole Act”), the government will receive a license under inventions developed under a government-funded program and may require us to manufacture products embodying such inventions in the United States.

Under certain circumstances, the government may also claim ownership in such inventions or compel us to license them to third parties.

Any failure by us to comply with federal regulations regarding intellectual property rights that were developed through the use of U.S.

government funding could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we do not obtain patent term extension in the United States under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments and in foreign countries under similar legislation, thereby potentially extending the term of marketing exclusivity for our product candidates, our business may be materially harmed.

Patents have a limited lifespan.

In the United States, if all maintenance fees are timely paid, the natural expiration of a patent is generally 20 years from its earliest U.S.

non-provisional filing date.

Various extensions may be available, but the life of a patent, and the protection

it affords, is limited.

Even if patents covering our product candidates are obtained, once the patent life has expired for a product,

we may be open to competition from competitive products.

Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory

review of new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized.

As a result, our owned and licensed patent portfolio may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing

products similar or identical to ours.

In the United States,

a patent that covers an FDA-approved drug, biologic or medical device may be eligible for a term extension designed to restore

the period of the patent term that is lost during the premarket regulatory review process conducted by the FDA.

Depending upon

the timing, duration and conditions of FDA marketing approval of our product candidates, we may be able to extend the term of a

patent covering each product candidate under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, referred to as

the Hatch-Waxman Amendments and similar legislation in the European Union.

The Hatch-Waxman Amendments permit a patent term extension

of up to five years for a patent covering an approved product as compensation for effective patent term lost during product development

and the FDA regulatory review process.

However, we may not receive an extension if we fail to apply within applicable deadlines,

fail to apply prior to expiration of relevant patents or otherwise fail to satisfy applicable requirements.

Moreover, the length

of the extension could be less than we request.

A patent term extension cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total

of 14 years from the date of product approval, and only claims covering such approved product, a method for using it or a method

for manufacturing it may be extended.

In the European Union, our product candidates may be eligible for term extensions based on

similar legislation.

If we are unable to obtain patent term extension or the term of any such extension is less than we request,

the period during which we can enforce our patent rights for that product will be shortened and our competitors may obtain approval

to market competing products sooner.

Various extensions may be available, but the life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is limited.

Even if patents covering our product candidates are obtained, once the patent life has expired for a product, we may be open to competition from competitive products.

Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized.

As a result, our owned and licensed patent portfolio may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours.

In the United States, a patent that covers an FDA-approved drug, biologic or medical device may be eligible for a term extension designed to restore the period of the patent term that is lost during the premarket regulatory review process conducted by the FDA.

Depending upon the timing, duration and conditions of FDA marketing approval of our product candidates, we may be able to extend the term of a patent covering each product candidate under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, referred to as the Hatch-Waxman Amendments and similar legislation in the European Union.

The Hatch-Waxman Amendments permit a patent term extension of up to five years for a patent covering an approved product as compensation for effective patent term lost during product development and the FDA regulatory review process.

However, we may not receive an extension if we fail to apply within applicable deadlines, fail to apply prior to expiration of relevant patents or otherwise fail to satisfy applicable requirements.

Moreover, the length of the extension could be less than we request.

A patent term extension cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the date of product approval, and only claims covering such approved product, a method for using it or a method for manufacturing it may be extended.

In the European Union, our product candidates may be eligible for term extensions based on similar legislation.

If we are unable to obtain patent term extension or the term of any such extension is less than we request, the period during which we can enforce our patent rights for that product will

be shortened and our competitors may obtain approval to market competing products sooner.

As a result, our revenue from applicable products could be reduced, possibly materially.

Further, under certain

circumstances, patent terms covering our products or product candidates may be extended for time spent during the pendency of the

patent application in the USPTO (referred to as Patent Term Adjustment (“PTA”)).

The laws and regulations underlying

how the USPTO calculates the PTA is subject to change and any such PTA granted by the USPTO could be challenged by a third-party.

If we do not prevail under such a challenge, the PTA may be reduced or eliminated, resulting in a shorter patent term, which may

negatively impact our ability to exclude competitors.

Because PTA added to the term of patents covering products has particular

value, our business may be adversely affected if the PTA is successfully challenged by a third party and our ability to exclude

competitors is reduced or eliminated.

Any of the foregoing could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial

condition and results of operations.

on certain technologies that are licensed to us.

We do not control the intellectual property rights covering these technologies,

and any loss of our rights to these technologies or the rights licensed to us could prevent us from selling our products and adversely

impact our business.

We are a party to

license agreements under which we are granted rights to intellectual property that is important to our business, and we may need

to enter into additional license agreements in the future.

We rely on these licenses in order to be able to use and sell various

proprietary technologies that are material to our business, as well as technologies we intend to use in our future commercial activities.

For example, we expect that we will be dependent on our licensing arrangements with Cook Biotech, relating to CanGaroo and our

cardiovascular products.

Our rights to use these technologies and the inventions claimed in the licensed patents are subject to

the continuation of and our compliance with the terms of those license agreements.

Our existing license agreements impose, and

we expect that future license agreements will also impose on us, various diligence obligations, milestone payments, royalties and

other obligations.

If we fail to comply with our obligations under these agreements, or if we are subject to a bankruptcy proceeding,

the licensor may have the right to terminate the license, in which case we would not be able to market products covered by the

license, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As we have done previously,

we may need to obtain additional licenses from third parties in order to advance our research or allow commercialization of our

products and technologies.

The in-licensing and acquisition of third-party intellectual property is a competitive area, and a number

of more established companies are also pursuing strategies to in-license or acquire third-party intellectual property rights that

we may consider attractive or necessary.

These established companies may have a competitive advantage over us due to their size,

cash resources and greater clinical development and commercialization capabilities.

Furthermore, companies that perceive us to

be a competitor may be unwilling to assign or license rights to us.

Accordingly, we may not be able to obtain any of these licenses

on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Even if we are able to obtain a license, it may be non-exclusive, thereby giving our

competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us.

In the event that we are not able to acquire a license, we may be required

to expend significant time and resources to develop or license replacement technology.

If we are unable to do so, we may be unable

to develop or commercialize the affected products and technologies, which could materially harm our business.

In addition, the

third parties owning such intellectual property rights could seek either an injunction prohibiting our sales, or, with respect

to our sales, an obligation on our part to pay royalties or other forms of compensation and damages.

In some cases, we

may not have the right to control the prosecution, maintenance or filing of the patents that are licensed to us, or the enforcement

of these patents against infringement by third parties.

Some of our patents and patent applications were not filed by us, but were

either acquired by us or are licensed from third parties.

Thus, these patents and patent applications were not drafted by us, and

we did not control or have any input into the prosecution of these patents and patent applications prior to our acquisition of,

or our entry into a license with respect to, such patents and patent applications.

We cannot be certain that the drafting or prosecution

of these patents and patent applications will result or has resulted in valid and enforceable patents.

Further, since we do not

always retain complete control over our ability to enforce our licensed patent rights against third-party infringement, we cannot

be certain that our licensor will elect to enforce these patents to the extent that we would choose to do so, or in a way that

will ensure that we retain the rights we currently have under the applicable license agreement.

If our licensor fails to properly

enforce the patents subject to our license agreement in the event of third-party infringement, our ability to retain our competitive

advantage with respect to the applicable products may be materially and adversely affected.

Licensing of intellectual

property is an important part of our business and involves complex legal, business and scientific issues.

Disputes may arise between

us and our licensors regarding intellectual property that is subject to a license agreement, including, with respect to, among

other things:

Further, under certain circumstances, patent terms covering our products or product candidates may be extended for time spent during the pendency of the patent application in the USPTO (referred to as Patent Term Adjustment (“PTA”)).

The laws and regulations underlying how the USPTO calculates the PTA is subject to change and any such PTA granted by the USPTO could be challenged by a third-party.

If we do not prevail under such a challenge, the PTA may be reduced or eliminated, resulting in a shorter patent term, which may negatively impact our ability to exclude competitors.

Because PTA added to the term of patents covering products has particular value, our business may be adversely affected if the PTA is successfully challenged by a third party and our ability to exclude competitors is reduced or eliminated.

Any of the foregoing could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We depend on certain technologies that are licensed to us.

We do not control the intellectual property rights covering these technologies, and any loss of our rights to these technologies or the rights licensed to us could prevent us from selling our products and adversely impact our business.

We are a party to license agreements under which we are granted rights to intellectual property that is important to our business, and we may need to enter into additional license agreements in the future.

We rely on these licenses in order to be able to use and sell various proprietary technologies that are material to our business, as well as technologies we intend to use in our future commercial activities.

For example, we expect that we will be dependent on our licensing arrangements with Cook Biotech, relating to CanGaroo and our cardiovascular products.

Our rights to use these technologies and the inventions claimed in the licensed patents are subject to the continuation of and our compliance with the terms of those license agreements.

Our existing license agreements impose, and we expect that future license agreements will also impose on us, various diligence obligations, milestone payments, royalties and other obligations.

If we fail to comply with our obligations under these agreements, or if we are subject to a bankruptcy proceeding, the licensor may have the right to terminate the license, in which case we would not be able to market products covered by the license, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As we have done previously, we may need to obtain additional licenses from third parties in order to advance our research or allow commercialization of our products and technologies.

The in-licensing and acquisition of third-party intellectual property is a competitive area, and a number of more established companies are also pursuing strategies to in-license or acquire third-party intellectual property rights that we may consider attractive or necessary.

These established companies may have a competitive advantage over us due to their size, cash resources and greater clinical development and commercialization capabilities.

Furthermore, companies that perceive us to be a competitor may be unwilling to assign or license rights to us.

Accordingly, we may not be able to obtain any of these licenses on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Even if we are able to obtain a license, it may be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us.

In the event that we are not able to acquire a license, we may be required to expend significant time and resources to develop or license replacement technology.

If we are unable to do so, we may be unable to develop or commercialize the affected products and technologies, which could materially harm our business.

In addition, the third parties owning such intellectual property rights could seek either an injunction prohibiting our sales, or, with respect to our sales, an obligation on our part to pay royalties or other forms of compensation and damages.

In some cases, we may not have the right to control the prosecution, maintenance or filing of the patents that are licensed to us, or the enforcement of these patents against infringement by third parties.

Some of our patents and patent applications were not filed by us, but were either acquired by us or are licensed from third parties.

Thus, these patents and patent applications were not drafted by us, and we did not control or have any input into the prosecution of these patents and patent applications prior to our acquisition of, or our entry into a license with respect to, such patents and patent applications.

We cannot be certain that the drafting or prosecution of these patents and patent applications will result or has resulted in valid and enforceable patents.

Further, since we do not always retain complete control over our ability to enforce our licensed patent rights against third-party infringement, we cannot be certain that our licensor will elect to enforce these patents to the extent that we would choose to do so, or in a way that will ensure that we retain the rights we currently have under the applicable license agreement.

If our licensor fails to properly enforce the patents subject to our license agreement in the event of third-party infringement, our ability to retain our competitive advantage with respect to the applicable products may be materially and adversely affected.

Licensing of intellectual property is an important part of our business and involves complex legal, business and scientific issues.

Disputes may arise between us and our licensors regarding intellectual property that is subject to a license agreement, including, with respect to, among other things:

● the scope of rights granted under the license agreement and other interpretation-related issues;

● whether our licensor had the right to grant the rights granted to us under the license agreement;

whether and the extent to which our technology and processes infringe, misappropriate or otherwise

violate intellectual property of the licensor that is not subject to the license agreement;

our right to sublicense patent and other rights to third parties under collaborative development

relationships;

our involvement in the prosecution and enforcement of the licensed patents and our licensor’s

overall patent enforcement strategy;

our diligence obligations with respect to the use of the licensed technology in relation to our

development and commercialization of our products and technologies, and what activities satisfy those diligence obligations;

the ownership of inventions and know-how resulting from the joint creation or use of intellectual

property by our licensors and us and our partners;

● whether and the extent to which our technology and processes infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate intellectual property of the licensor that is not subject to the license agreement;

● our right to sublicense patent and other rights to third parties under collaborative development relationships;

● our involvement in the prosecution and enforcement of the licensed patents and our licensor’s overall patent enforcement strategy;

● our diligence obligations with respect to the use of the licensed technology in relation to our development and commercialization of our products and technologies, and what activities satisfy those diligence obligations;

● the ownership of inventions and know-how resulting from the joint creation or use of intellectual property by our licensors and us and our partners;

● the amounts of royalties, milestones or other payments due under the license agreement.

In addition, we may

become the owner of intellectual property that was obtained through assignments, which may be subject to re-assignment back to

the original assignor upon our failure to prosecute or maintain such intellectual property, upon our breach of the agreement pursuant

to which such intellectual property was assigned, or upon our bankruptcy.

The resolution of

any contract interpretation disagreement that may arise could narrow what we believe to be the scope of our rights to the relevant

intellectual property or technology, or increase what we believe to be our financial or other obligations under the relevant agreement.

If disputes over intellectual property that we have licensed prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current licensing arrangements

on acceptable terms, or if intellectual property is re-assigned back to the original assignor, we may be unable to successfully

develop and commercialize or continue selling products that utilize the affected intellectual property, any of which could impair

our ability to execute our growth strategy and could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and

results of operations.

be able to protect and enforce our trademarks and trade names, or build name recognition in our markets of interest, thereby harming

our competitive position.

We have not yet registered

certain of our trademarks in all of our potential markets.

If we apply to register these and other trademarks in the United States

and other countries, our applications may not be allowed for registration in a timely fashion or at all, and our registered trademarks

may not be maintained or enforced.

In addition, the registered or unregistered trademarks or trade names that we own may be challenged,

infringed, circumvented, declared generic, lapsed or determined to be infringing on or dilutive of other marks.

We may not be able

to protect our rights in these trademarks and trade names, which we need in order to build name recognition.

In addition, third

parties may file for registration of trademarks similar or identical to our trademarks, thereby impeding our ability to build brand

identity and possibly leading to market confusion.

If they succeed in registering or developing common law rights in such trademarks,

and if we are not successful in challenging such rights, we may not be able to use these trademarks to develop brand recognition

of our technologies, products or services.

In addition, there could be potential trade name or trademark infringement claims brought

by owners of other registered trademarks or trademarks that incorporate variations of our registered or unregistered trademarks

or trade names.

Further, we may in the future enter into agreements with owners of such third party trade names or trademarks to

avoid potential trademark litigation which may limit our ability to use our trade names or trademarks in certain fields of business.

In addition, opposition

or cancellation proceedings may in the future be filed against our trademark applications and registrations, and our trademarks

may not survive such proceedings.

In addition, we may become the owner of intellectual property that was obtained through assignments, which may be subject to re-assignment back to the original assignor upon our failure to prosecute or maintain such intellectual property, upon our breach of the agreement pursuant to which such intellectual property was assigned, or upon our bankruptcy.

The resolution of any contract interpretation disagreement that may arise could narrow what we believe to be the scope of our rights to the relevant intellectual property or technology, or increase what we believe to be our financial or other obligations under the relevant agreement.

If disputes over intellectual property that we have licensed prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current licensing arrangements on acceptable terms, or if intellectual property is re-assigned back to the original assignor, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize or continue selling products that utilize the affected intellectual property, any of which could impair our ability to execute our growth strategy and could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be able to protect and enforce our trademarks and trade names, or build name recognition in our markets of interest, thereby harming our competitive position.

We have not yet registered certain of our trademarks in all of our potential markets.

If we apply to register these and other trademarks in the United States and other countries, our applications may not be allowed for registration in a timely fashion or at all, and our registered trademarks may not be maintained or enforced.

In addition, the registered or unregistered trademarks or trade names that we own may be challenged, infringed, circumvented, declared generic, lapsed or determined to be infringing on or dilutive of other marks.

We may not be able to protect our rights in these trademarks and trade names, which we need in order to build name recognition.

In addition, third parties may file for registration of trademarks similar or identical to our trademarks, thereby impeding our ability to build brand identity and possibly leading to market confusion.

If they succeed in registering or developing common law rights in such trademarks, and if we are not successful in challenging such rights, we may not be able to use these trademarks to develop brand recognition of our technologies, products or services.

In addition, there could be potential trade name or trademark infringement claims brought by owners of other registered trademarks or trademarks that incorporate variations of our registered or unregistered trademarks or trade names.

Further, we may in the future enter into agreements with owners of such third party trade names

or trademarks to avoid potential trademark litigation which may limit our ability to use our trade names or trademarks in certain fields of business.

In addition, opposition or cancellation proceedings may in the future be filed against our trademark applications and registrations, and our trademarks may not survive such proceedings.

In addition, third parties may file first for our trademarks in certain countries.

If they succeed

in registering such trademarks, and if we are not successful in challenging such third party rights, we may not be able to use

these trademarks to market our products in those countries.

If we do not secure registrations for our trademarks, we may encounter

more difficulty in enforcing them against third parties than we otherwise would.

If we are unable to establish name recognition

based on our trademarks and trade names, we may not be able to compete effectively, which could have a material adverse effect

on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Risks Related to

Our Common Stock

that the price of our Class A common stock will fluctuate substantially and you may not be able to sell the shares you purchase

at or above the price you paid for such shares.

The market price of

our Class A common stock is likely to be highly volatile and may fluctuate substantially due to a variety of factors, many of which

are outside of our control, including, among other things:

If they succeed in registering such trademarks, and if we are not successful in challenging such third party rights, we may not be able to use these trademarks to market our products in those countries.

If we do not secure registrations for our trademarks, we may encounter more difficulty in enforcing them against third parties than we otherwise would.

If we are unable to establish name recognition based on our trademarks and trade names, we may not be able to compete effectively, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

We expect that the price of our Class A common stock will fluctuate substantially and you may not be able to sell the shares you purchase at or above the price you paid for such shares.

The market price of our Class A common stock is likely to be highly volatile and may fluctuate substantially due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control, including, among other things:

● the volume and timing of sales of our products;

1 unchanged sentence

● developments related to the COVID-19 pandemic;

disputes or other developments with respect to our or others’

intellectual property rights;

our ability to develop, obtain regulatory clearance or approval for, and market new and enhanced

products on a timely basis;

changes or proposed changes in laws or regulations or differing interpretations or enforcement

thereof affecting our business;

● disputes or other developments with respect to our or others’ intellectual property rights;

● our ability to develop, obtain regulatory clearance or approval for, and market new and enhanced products on a timely basis;

● changes or proposed changes in laws or regulations or differing interpretations or enforcement thereof affecting our business;

● product liability claims, other litigation or regulatory investigations;

annual or quarterly variations in our results of operations or those of others in our industry,

or results of operations that otherwise vary from those expected by securities analysts and investors;

publications, reports or other media exposure of our products or those of others in our industry,

or of our industry generally;

announcements by us or others in our industry, or by our or their respective suppliers, distributors

or other business partners, regarding, among other things, significant contracts, price reductions, capital commitments or other

business developments, the entry into or termination of strategic transactions or relationships, securities offerings or other

financing initiatives, and public reaction thereto;

● annual or quarterly variations in our results of operations or those of others in our industry, or results of operations that otherwise vary from those expected by securities analysts and investors;

● publications, reports or other media exposure of our products or those of others in our industry, or of our industry generally;

● announcements by us or others in our industry, or by our or their respective suppliers, distributors or other business partners, regarding, among other things, significant contracts, price reductions, capital commitments or other business developments, the entry into or termination of strategic transactions or relationships, securities offerings or other financing initiatives, and public reaction thereto;

● additions or departures of key management personnel;

● changes in governmental regulations or in reimbursement;

changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts, or other changes in investor

perceptions of the investment opportunity associated with our common stock relative to other investment alternatives;

● changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts, or other changes in investor perceptions of the investment opportunity associated with our common stock relative to other investment alternatives;

● the development and sustainability of an active trading market for our Class A common stock;

general market conditions and other factors, including factors unrelated to our operating performance

or the operating performance of our competitors;

● general market conditions and other factors, including factors unrelated to our operating performance or the operating performance of our competitors;

● other factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A.

“Risk Factors”

of this Annual Report.

In recent years, the

stock markets generally have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate

to the operating performance of those companies, including, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Broad market and industry factors

may significantly affect the market price of our Class A common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance.

If the market

price of shares of our Class A common stock does not ever exceed the price you paid for your shares, you may not realize any return

on your investment in us and may lose some or all of your investment.

In addition, in the

past, class action litigation has often been instituted against companies whose securities have experienced periods of volatility

in market price.

Securities litigation brought against us following volatility in our stock price, regardless of the merit or ultimate

results of such litigation, could result in substantial costs, which would hurt our financial condition and operating results and

divert management’s attention and resources away from our business.

Our principal

stockholders have significant voting power and may take actions that may not be in the best interests of our other stockholders.

As of December 31,

2020, our principal stockholders each holding more than 5% of our Class A common stock collectively control approximately 56.5%

of our outstanding Class A common stock.

As a result, these stockholders, if they act together, will be able to control the management

and affairs of our company and most matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of

significant corporate transactions.

“Risk Factors” of this Annual Report.

In recent years, the stock markets generally have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies, including, as a result of the pandemic related to COVID-19 and variants such as Delta.

Broad market and industry factors may significantly affect the market price of our Class A common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance.

If the market price of shares of our Class A common stock does not ever exceed the price you paid for your shares, you may not realize any return on your investment in us and may lose some or all of your investment.

In addition, in the past, class action litigation has often been instituted against companies whose securities have experienced periods of volatility in market price.

Securities litigation brought against us following volatility in our stock price, regardless of the merit or ultimate results of such litigation, could result in substantial costs, which would hurt our financial condition and operating results and divert management’s attention and resources away from our business.

Our principal stockholders have significant voting power and may take actions that may not be in the best interests of our other stockholders.

As of December 31, 2021, our principal stockholders each holding more than 5% of our Class A common stock collectively control approximately 65.3% of our outstanding Class A common stock.

As a result, these stockholders, if they act together, will be able to control the management and affairs of our company and most matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions.

The interests of these stockholders may not be the same as or may even conflict with your interests.

For example, these stockholders could attempt to delay or prevent a change in control of the company, even if such change in control

would benefit our other stockholders, thereby depriving our other stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their

common stock as part of a sale of the company or our assets.

Conversely, these stockholders may pursue acquisitions, divestitures

and other transactions that, in their judgment, could enhance the value of their investment, even though such transactions might

involve risks to you.

Even in the absence of any actual conflict of interest, the degree of control possessed by these stockholders

may affect the prevailing market price of our Class A common stock due to investors’

perceptions that such conflicts of interest

may exist or arise.

As a result, this concentration of ownership may not be in the best interests of our other stockholders and

may impair your ability to realize any return on your investment in us and may impair your ability to avoid losing some or all

of your investment.

A significant

portion of our total outstanding shares are eligible to be sold into the market in the near future, which could cause the market

price of our Class A common stock to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.

Sales of a substantial

number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of

shares intend to sell their shares, could reduce the market price of our Class A common stock.

As of December 31, 2020, we had

outstanding 10,226,122 shares of Class A and Class B, collectively.

This includes the 2,941,176 shares that we sold in our IPO,

which may be resold in the public market immediately without restriction.

As a holder of our Class B common stock, Deerfield only

has the right to convert each share of our Class B common stock into one share of Class A common stock at its election to the extent

that as a result of such conversion, it would not beneficially own in excess of 4.9% of any class of our securities registered

under the Exchange Act.

As a result, Deerfield may not be deemed an “affiliate”

for purposes of Rule 144 and, as a

result, any securities it purchases may be freely tradable.

Approximately 7.1 million of the remaining shares are restricted as

a result of securities laws or lock-up agreements (which may be waived, with or without notice, by Piper Sandler & Co.

Cowen and Company, LLC) but will become eligible to be sold at various times beginning 180 days after the date of the prospectus

filed with the SEC on October 8, 2020 (the “Prospectus”), unless held by one of our affiliates, in which case the resale

of those securities will be subject to volume limitations under Rule 144 of the Securities Act.

Because Deerfield may not be deemed

an “affiliate”

for purposes of Rule 144, up to approximately 2.4 million shares of Class B common stock that Deerfield

holds may become freely tradable and not subject to volume limitations following the 180-day lock-up period.

Moreover, as of the

date of this Annual Report, holders of an aggregate of up to approximately 7.1 million shares of our common stock have rights,

subject to certain conditions and limitations, to require us to file registration statements covering their shares or to include

their shares in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or other stockholders, until such rights terminate pursuant

to the terms of our Investor Rights Agreement.

We also intend to register all shares of Class A common stock that we may issue

under our equity compensation plans.

Once we register these shares, they can be freely sold in the public market upon issuance,

subject to volume limitations applicable to affiliates and the lock-up agreements.

The market price of

our common stock may drop significantly when the restrictions on resale by our existing stockholders lapse or when we are required

to register the sale of our stockholders’

remaining shares of our common stock.

A decline in the trading price of our common

stock might impede our ability to raise capital through the issuance of additional shares of our Class A common stock or other

equity securities and may impair your ability to sell shares of our common stock at a price higher than the price you paid for

them or at all.

class structure of our common stock and the option of the holders of shares of our Class B common stock to convert into shares

of our Class A common stock may limit your ability to influence corporate matters.

Our Class A common

stock has one vote per share, while our Class B common stock is non-voting.

Nonetheless, each share of our Class B common stock

may be converted at any time into one share of Class A common stock at the option of its holder, subject to the limitations provided

for in our certificate of incorporation that prohibit the conversion of our Class B common stock into shares of Class A common

stock to the extent that, upon such conversion, such holder would beneficially own in excess of 4.9% of any class of our securities

registered under the Exchange Act.

Consequently, if holders of Class B common stock exercise their option to make this conversion,

such exercise will have the effect of increasing the relative voting power of those prior holders of our Class B common stock (subject

to the ownership limitation described in the previous sentence) and increasing the number of outstanding shares of our voting common

stock, and correspondingly decreasing the relative voting power of the current holders of our Class A common stock, which may limit

your ability to influence corporate matters.

Because our Class B common stock is generally non-voting, stockholders who own more

than 10% of our common stock overall but 10% or less of our Class A common stock will not be required to report changes in their

ownership from transactions in our Class B common stock pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and would not be subject

to the short-swing profit provisions of Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.

be diluted by the future issuance of additional common stock in connection with our incentive plans, acquisitions or otherwise.

As of December 31,

2020, we had 192,908,040 shares of Class A common stock authorized but unissued and 16,865,838 shares of Class B common stock authorized

but unissued.

We are authorized under our certificate of incorporation to issue these shares of common stock and other securities

convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of our common stock for the consideration and on the terms and conditions

established by our board of directors in its sole discretion, whether in connection with acquisitions or otherwise.

As of December

31, 2020, we had a total of 917,437 shares of our Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options under

our 2015 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan, as amended (the “2015 Plan”) and our 2020 Incentive Award Plan (the “2020

Plan”) at a weighted average exercise price of $13.68 per share, 178,297 of which were vested as of such date, 147,833

shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the settlement of RSUs granted under our 2020 Plan to several of our executive officers,

employees and consultants, 908,103 additional shares of our Class A common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2020 Plan,

not including the additional shares of Class A common stock that will be reserved for future issuance under our 2020 Plan pursuant

to provisions in the 2020 Plan that automatically increase the number of shares of our Class A common stock reserved for future

issuance thereunder, and 143,150 shares of our Class A common stock that will become available for future issuance under our 2020

Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2020 ESPP”), not including the additional shares of Class A common stock that will

be reserved for future issuance under our 2020 ESPP pursuant to provisions in the 2020 ESPP that automatically increase the number

of shares of our Class A common stock reserved for future issuance thereunder.

Any additional shares of common stock that we issue,

including under our 2020 Plan, 2020 ESPP or other equity incentive plans that we may adopt in the future, would dilute the percentage

ownership and voting power held by investors who purchase our common stock.

In the future, we may also issue additional securities

if we need to raise capital, including, but not limited to, in connection with acquisitions, which could constitute a material

portion of our then-outstanding shares of our common stock.

“emerging growth company”

and a “smaller reporting company,”

and the reduced disclosure requirements applicable

to emerging growth companies and smaller reporting companies may make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging

growth company,”

as defined in the JOBS Act, and a “smaller reporting company,”

as defined in Rule 12b-2 under

the Exchange Act.

Emerging growth companies and smaller reporting companies may take advantage of certain exemptions from various

reporting requirements that are applicable to other publicly-traded entities that are not emerging growth companies or smaller

reporting companies.

With respect to emerging

growth companies, these exemptions include:

the option to present only two years of audited financial statements , in addition to any required

unaudited interim financial statements, with a correspondingly reduced Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial

Condition and Results of Operations;

not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

not being required to comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting

Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information

about the audit and the financial statements (i.e., an auditor discussion and analysis);

not being required to submit certain executive compensation matters to stockholder advisory votes,

such as “say-on-pay,”

“say-on-frequency”

and “say-on-golden parachutes”;

not being required to disclose certain executive compensation related items such as the correlation

between executive compensation and performance and comparisons of the chief executive officer’s compensation to median employee

compensation.

We have elected to

take advantage of certain of these reduced disclosure obligations and may elect to take advantage of other reduced reporting requirements

in the future.

As a result, the information that we provide to our stockholders may be different than the information you might

receive from other public reporting companies in which you hold equity interests.

In addition, the JOBS Act permits emerging growth

companies to delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies.

We have elected to use this extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards until the earlier

of the date we (i) are no longer an emerging growth company or (ii) affirmatively and irrevocably opt out of the extended transition

period provided in the JOBS Act.

As a result, our consolidated financial statements and the reported results of operations contained

therein may not be directly comparable to those of other public companies.

We cannot predict whether investors will find our common

stock less attractive because of our reliance on these exemptions.

If some investors do find our common stock less attractive,

there may be a less active trading market for our Class A common stock and our stock price may be reduced or more volatile.

We will remain an

emerging growth company, and will be able to take advantage of the foregoing exemptions, until the earliest of:

(i) the last day

of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenues are $1.07 billion or more;

For example, these stockholders could attempt to delay or prevent a change in control of the company, even if such change in control would benefit our other stockholders, thereby depriving our other stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as part of a sale of the company or our assets.

Conversely, these stockholders may pursue acquisitions, divestitures and other transactions that, in their judgment, could enhance the value of their investment, even though such transactions might involve risks to you.

Even in the absence of any actual conflict of interest, the degree of control possessed by these stockholders may affect the prevailing market price of our Class A common stock due to investors’ perceptions that such conflicts of interest may exist or arise.

As a result, this concentration of ownership may not be in the best interests of our other stockholders and may impair your ability to realize any return on your investment in us and may impair your ability to avoid losing some or all of your investment.

A significant portion of our total outstanding shares are eligible to be sold into the market in the near future, which could cause the market price of our Class A common stock to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell their shares, could reduce the market price of our Class A common stock.

As of December 31, 2021, we had outstanding 13,558,552 shares of Class A and Class B, collectively.

This includes the 2,941,176 shares that we sold in our IPO and the 3,301,881 shares that we sold in our December 2021 private placement, which may be resold in the public market immediately without restriction.

As a holder of our Class B common stock, Deerfield only has the right to convert each share of our Class B common stock into one share of Class A common stock at its election to the extent that as a result of such conversion, it would not beneficially own in excess of 4.9% of any class of our securities registered under the Exchange Act.

As a result, Deerfield may not be deemed an “affiliate” for purposes of Rule 144 and, as a result, any securities it purchases may be freely tradable.

Approximately 7.1 million of the remaining shares are restricted as a result of securities laws or lock-up agreements (which may be waived, with or without

notice, by Piper Sandler & Co.

and Cowen and Company, LLC) but will become eligible to be sold at various times beginning 180 days after the date of the prospectus filed with the SEC on October 8, 2020 (the “Prospectus”), unless held by one of our affiliates, in which case the resale of those securities will be subject to volume limitations under Rule 144 of the Securities Act.

Because Deerfield may not be deemed an “affiliate” for purposes of Rule 144, up to approximately 2.4 million shares of Class B common stock that Deerfield holds may become freely tradable and not subject to volume limitations following the 180-day lock-up period.

Moreover, as of the date of this Annual Report, holders of an aggregate of up to approximately 7.1 million shares of our common stock have rights, subject to certain conditions and limitations, to require us to file registration statements covering their shares or to include their shares in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or other stockholders, until such rights terminate pursuant to the terms of our Investor Rights Agreement.

We also intend to register all shares of Class A common stock that we may issue under our equity compensation plans.

Once we register these shares, they can be freely sold in the public market upon issuance, subject to volume limitations applicable to affiliates and the lock-up agreements.

The market price of our common stock may drop significantly when the restrictions on resale by our existing stockholders lapse or when we are required to register the sale of our stockholders’ remaining shares of our common stock.

A decline in the trading price of our common stock might impede our ability to raise capital through the issuance of additional shares of our Class A common stock or other equity securities and may impair your ability to sell shares of our common stock at a price higher than the price you paid for them or at all.

The dual class structure of our common stock and the option of the holders of shares of our Class B common stock to convert into shares of our Class A common stock may limit your ability to influence corporate matters.

Our Class A common stock has one vote per share, while our Class B common stock is non-voting.

Nonetheless, each share of our Class B common stock may be converted at any time into one share of Class A common stock at the option of its holder, subject to the limitations provided for in our certificate of incorporation that prohibit the conversion of our Class B common stock into shares of Class A common stock to the extent that, upon such conversion, such holder would beneficially own in excess of 4.9% of any class of our securities registered under the Exchange Act.

Consequently, if holders of Class B common stock exercise their option to make this conversion, such exercise will have the effect of increasing the relative voting power of those prior holders of our Class B common stock (subject to the ownership limitation described in the previous sentence) and increasing the number of outstanding shares of our voting common stock, and correspondingly decreasing the relative voting power of the current holders of our Class A common stock, which may limit your ability to influence corporate matters.

Because our Class B common stock is generally non-voting, stockholders who own more than 10% of our common stock overall but 10% or less of our Class A common stock will not be required to report changes in their ownership from transactions in our Class B common stock pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and would not be subject to the short-swing profit provisions of Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.

You may be diluted by the future issuance of additional common stock in connection with our incentive plans, acquisitions or otherwise.

As of December 31, 2021, we had 190,754,854 shares of Class A common stock authorized but unissued and 15,686,594 shares of Class B common stock authorized but unissued.

We are authorized under our certificate of incorporation to issue these shares of common stock and other securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of our common stock for the consideration and on the terms and conditions established by our board of directors in its sole discretion, whether in connection with acquisitions or otherwise.

As of December 31, 2021, we had a total of 1,386,811 shares of our Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options under our 2015 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan, as amended (the “2015 Plan”) and our 2020 Incentive Award Plan (the “2020 Plan”) at a weighted average exercise price of $13.28 per share, 394,437 of which were vested as of such date, 235,855 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the settlement of RSUs granted under our 2020 Plan to several of our executive officers, employees and consultants, 756,554 additional shares of our Class A common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2020 Plan, not including the additional shares of Class A common stock that will be reserved for future issuance under our 2020 Plan pursuant to provisions in the 2020 Plan that automatically increase the number of shares of our Class A common stock reserved for future issuance thereunder, and 186,826 shares of our Class A common stock that will become available for future issuance under our 2020 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2020 ESPP”), not including the

additional shares of Class A common stock that will be reserved for future issuance under our 2020 ESPP pursuant to provisions in the 2020 ESPP that automatically increase the number of shares of our Class A common stock reserved for future issuance thereunder.

Any additional shares of common stock that we issue, including under our 2020 Plan, 2020 ESPP or other equity incentive plans that we may adopt in the future, would dilute the percentage ownership and voting power held by investors who purchase our common stock.

In the future, we may also issue additional securities if we need to raise capital, including, but not limited to, in connection with acquisitions, which could constitute a material portion of our then-outstanding shares of our common stock.

We are an “emerging growth company” and a “smaller reporting company,” and the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies and smaller reporting companies may make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and a “smaller reporting company,” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act.

Emerging growth companies and smaller reporting companies may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other publicly-traded entities that are not emerging growth companies or smaller reporting companies.

With respect to emerging growth companies, these exemptions include:

● the option to present only two years of audited financial statements , in addition to any required unaudited interim financial statements, with a correspondingly reduced Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations;

● not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;

● not being required to comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements (i.e., an auditor discussion and analysis);

● not being required to submit certain executive compensation matters to stockholder advisory votes, such as “say-on-pay,” “say-on-frequency” and “say-on-golden parachutes”;

● not being required to disclose certain executive compensation related items such as the correlation between executive compensation and performance and comparisons of the chief executive officer’s compensation to median employee compensation.

We have elected to take advantage of certain of these reduced disclosure obligations and may elect to take advantage of other reduced reporting requirements in the future.

As a result, the information that we provide to our stockholders may be different than the information you might receive from other public reporting companies in which you hold equity interests.

In addition, the JOBS Act permits emerging growth companies to delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies.

We have elected to use this extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards until the earlier of the date we (i) are no longer an emerging growth company or (ii) affirmatively and irrevocably opt out of the extended transition period provided in the JOBS Act.

As a result, our consolidated financial statements and the reported results of operations contained therein may not be directly comparable to those of other public companies.

We cannot predict whether investors will find our common stock less attractive because of our reliance on these exemptions.

If some investors do find our common stock less attractive, there may be a less active trading market for our Class A common stock and our stock price may be reduced or more volatile.

We will remain an emerging growth company, and will be able to take advantage of the foregoing exemptions, until the earliest of:

(i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenues are $1.07 billion or more;

(ii) the last day of 2025;

(iii) the date

that we become a “large accelerated filer”

as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, which would occur if the

market value of our common equity held by non-affiliates is $700 million or more as of the last business day of our most recently

completed second fiscal quarter;

or (iv) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities

during the previous three years.

Even after we cease

to be an emerging growth company, we will still be a smaller reporting company until such time as (i) we determine that the market

value of the voting and non-voting shares held by non-affiliates is $250 million or more but less than $700 million as of the last

business day of our second fiscal quarter and our annual revenues are $100 million or more during our most recently completed fiscal

year, or (ii) the market value of the voting and non-voting shares held by non-affiliates is $700 million or more measured on the

last business day of our second fiscal quarter.

If we are a smaller reporting company at the time we cease to be an emerging growth

company, we may continue to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are available to smaller reporting companies,

including reduced financial and executive compensation disclosure.

In addition, even if we cease to be an emerging growth company,

we will remain exempt from the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act provided we do not qualify

as an “accelerated filer”

as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, which would occur if our annual revenue

was $100 million or more during our most recently completed fiscal year and the market value of our common equity held by non-affiliates

is $75 million or more as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, and only after we have

been subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for a period of at least 12 calendar months.

incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time

to new compliance initiatives and corporate governance practices.

As a public company,

and particularly after we are no longer an emerging growth company, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses

that we did not incur as a private company.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act,

the listing requirements of The Nasdaq Global Market and other applicable securities rules and regulations impose various requirements

on public companies, including establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance

Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives,

which will divert their attention away from our core business operations and revenue-producing activities.

Moreover, these rules

and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly.

For example, we expect that these rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director

and officer liability insurance, which in turn could require us to incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar

coverage or accept reduced policy limits and coverage, which in turn could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain

qualified individuals to serve on our board of directors and as our executive officers.

We cannot predict

or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.

These rules and regulations are often subject

to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may

evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies.

This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding

compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices.

In addition, if we

fail to comply with these rules and regulations, we could be subject to a number of penalties, including the delisting of our Class

A common stock, fines, sanctions or other regulatory action or civil litigation.

to comply with requirements to design, implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could have a

material adverse effect on our business and stock price.

As a public company,

we are required to evaluate our internal control over financial reporting in a manner that meets the standards of publicly traded

companies required by Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or Section 404.

As a public company,

we have significant requirements for enhanced financial reporting and internal controls.

The process of designing, implementing

and maintaining effective internal controls is a continuous effort that will require us to anticipate and react to changes in our

business and the economic and regulatory environments.

In this regard, we will need to continue to dedicate internal resources,

potentially engage outside consultants, adopt a detailed work plan to assess and document the adequacy of internal control over

financial reporting, continue steps to improve control processes as appropriate, validate through testing whether such controls

are functioning as documented, and implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for internal control over financial

If we are unable to establish or maintain appropriate internal financial reporting controls and procedures, it could

cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations on a timely basis, result in material misstatements in our consolidated financial

statements and adversely affect our operating results.

In addition, we will be required, pursuant to Section 404, to furnish a

report by our management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in the second

annual report following the closing of our IPO.

This assessment will need to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified

by our management in our internal control over financial reporting.

The rules governing the standards that must be met for our

management to assess our internal control over financial reporting are complex and require significant documentation and testing.

Testing and maintaining internal controls may divert our management’s attention from other matters that are important to

our business.

In addition, once we are no longer an emerging growth company, provided we then qualify as an “accelerated

as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, we will be required to include in the annual reports that we file

with the SEC an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting issued by our independent registered public

accounting firm.

In connection with

the implementation of the necessary procedures and practices related to internal control over financial reporting, we may identify

deficiencies that we may not be able to remediate in time to meet the deadline imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for compliance

with the requirements of Section 404.

In addition, we may encounter problems or delays in completing the remediation of any deficiencies

identified by our independent registered public accounting firm in connection with the issuance of their attestation report.

testing, or the subsequent testing by our independent registered public accounting firm, may reveal deficiencies in our internal

controls over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses.

Any material weaknesses could result in a material

misstatement of our annual or quarterly consolidated financial statements or disclosures that may not be prevented or detected.

Furthermore, we may

not be able to conclude, on an ongoing basis, that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with

Section 404, or our independent registered public accounting firm may not be able to issue an unqualified attestation report once

we become subject to the corresponding requirement under Section 404.

If either we are unable to conclude that we have effective

internal control over financial reporting or our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to provide us with an

unqualified report, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a material adverse

effect on the trading price of our Class A common stock.

in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of our company, which may be beneficial

to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.

Provisions in our

certificate of incorporation and our bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control of

our company that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for

These provisions could also limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our

common stock, thereby depressing the market price of our Class A common stock.

In addition, because our board of directors is responsible

for appointing the members of our management team, these provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to

replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors.

(iii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange

Act, which would occur if the market value of our common equity held by non-affiliates is $700 million or more as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter;

or (iv) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the previous three years.

Even after we cease to be an emerging growth company, we will still be a smaller reporting company until such time as (i) we determine that the market value of the voting and non-voting shares held by non-affiliates is $250 million or more but less than $700 million as of the last business day of our second fiscal quarter and our annual revenues are $100 million or more during our most recently completed fiscal year, or (ii) the market value of the voting and non-voting shares held by non-affiliates is $700 million or more measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter.

If we are a smaller reporting company at the time we cease to be an emerging growth company, we may continue to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are available to smaller reporting companies, including reduced financial and executive compensation disclosure.

In addition, even if we cease to be an emerging growth company, we will remain exempt from the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act provided we do not qualify as an “accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, which would occur if our annual revenue was $100 million or more during our most recently completed fiscal year and the market value of our common equity held by non-affiliates is $75 million or more as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, and only after we have been subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for a period of at least 12 calendar months.

We will incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives and corporate governance practices.

As a public company, and particularly after we are no longer an emerging growth company, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the listing requirements of The Nasdaq Global Market and other applicable securities rules and regulations impose various requirements on public companies, including establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance practices.

Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives, which will divert their attention away from our core business operations and revenue-producing activities.

Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly.

For example, we expect that these rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, which in turn could require us to incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage or accept reduced policy limits and coverage, which in turn could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on our board of directors and as our executive officers.

We cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.

These rules and regulations are often subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies.

This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices.

In addition, if we fail to comply with these rules and regulations, we could be subject to a number of penalties, including the delisting of our Class A common stock, fines, sanctions or other regulatory action or civil litigation.

Failure to comply with requirements to design, implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on our business and stock price.

As a public company, we are required to evaluate our internal control over financial reporting in a manner that meets the standards of publicly traded companies required by Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or Section 404.

As a public company, we have significant requirements for enhanced financial reporting and internal controls.

The process of designing, implementing and maintaining effective internal controls is a continuous effort that will require us to anticipate and react to changes in our business and the economic and regulatory environments.

In this regard, we will need to continue to dedicate internal resources, potentially engage outside consultants, adopt a detailed work plan to assess and document the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting, continue steps to improve control processes as

appropriate, validate through testing whether such controls are functioning as documented, and implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for internal control over financial reporting.

If we are unable to establish or maintain appropriate internal financial reporting controls and procedures, it could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations on a timely basis, result in material misstatements in our consolidated financial statements and adversely affect our operating results.

In addition, we are required, pursuant to Section 404, to furnish a report by our management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

This assessment must include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control over financial reporting.

The rules governing the standards that must be met for our management to assess our internal control over financial reporting are complex and require significant documentation and testing.

Testing and maintaining internal controls may divert our management’s attention from other matters that are important to our business.

In addition, once we are no longer an emerging growth company, provided we then qualify as an “accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, we will be required to include in the annual reports that we file with the SEC an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting issued by our independent registered public accounting firm.

In connection with the implementation of the necessary procedures and practices related to internal control over financial reporting, we may identify deficiencies that we may not be able to remediate in time to meet the deadline imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for compliance with the requirements of Section 404.

In addition, we may encounter problems or delays in completing the remediation of any deficiencies identified by our independent registered public accounting firm in connection with the issuance of their attestation report.

Our testing, or the subsequent testing by our independent registered public accounting firm, may reveal deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses.

Any material weaknesses could result in a material misstatement of our annual or quarterly consolidated financial statements or disclosures that may not be prevented or detected.

Furthermore, we may not be able to conclude, on an ongoing basis, that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404, or our independent registered public accounting firm may not be able to issue an unqualified attestation report once we become subject to the corresponding requirement under Section 404.

If either we are unable to conclude that we have effective internal control over financial reporting or our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to provide us with an unqualified report, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a material adverse effect on the trading price of our Class A common stock.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of our company, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control of our company that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for your shares.

These provisions could also limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock, thereby depressing the market price of our Class A common stock.

In addition, because our board of directors is responsible for appointing the members of our management team, these provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors.

Among other things, these provisions include those establishing:

a classified board of directors with three-year staggered terms, which may delay the ability of

stockholders to change the membership of a majority of our board of directors;

no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which limits the ability of minority stockholders

to elect director candidates;

the exclusive right of our board of directors to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by

the expansion of the board of directors or the resignation, death or removal of a director, which prevents stockholders from filling

vacancies on our board of directors;

the ability of our board of directors to authorize the issuance of shares of preferred stock and

to determine the terms of those shares, including preferences and voting rights, without stockholder approval, which could be used

to significantly dilute the ownership of a hostile acquirer;

● a classified board of directors with three-year staggered terms, which may delay the ability of stockholders to change the membership of a majority of our board of directors;

● no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect director candidates;

● the exclusive right of our board of directors to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors or the resignation, death or removal of a director, which prevents stockholders from filling vacancies on our board of directors;

● the ability of our board of directors to authorize the issuance of shares of preferred stock and to determine the terms of those shares, including preferences and voting rights, without stockholder approval, which could be used to significantly dilute the ownership of a hostile acquirer;

● the ability of our board of directors to alter our bylaws without obtaining stockholder approval;

the required approval of the holders of at least two-thirds of the shares entitled to vote at an

election of directors to adopt, amend or repeal our bylaws or repeal the provisions of our certificate of incorporation regarding

the election and removal of directors;

a prohibition on stockholder action by written consent, which forces stockholder action to be taken

at an annual or special meeting of our stockholders;

the requirement that a special meeting of stockholders may be called only by the chairman of the

board of directors, the chief executive officer, the president or the board of directors, which may delay the ability of our stockholders

to force consideration of a proposal or to take action, including the removal of directors;

advance notice procedures that stockholders must comply with in order to nominate candidates to

our board of directors or to propose matters to be acted upon at a stockholders’

meeting, which may discourage or deter a

potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirer’s own slate of directors or otherwise

attempting to obtain control of us.

Moreover, because

we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State of

Delaware (the “DGCL”), which prohibits a person who owns in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock from merging

or combining with us for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person acquired in excess of 15%

of our outstanding voting stock, unless the merger or combination is approved in a prescribed manner.

Our certificate

of incorporation designates specific courts as the exclusive forum for certain litigation that may be initiated by our stockholders,

which could limit our stockholders’

ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers

or employees.

Our certificate of

incorporation provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the

State of Delaware will be the exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action

asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty or other wrongdoing by any of our directors, officers, employees or agents to us

or our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or our certificate of incorporation

or bylaws, (iv) any action to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of our certificate of incorporation or bylaws

or (v) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine;

provided that, the exclusive forum provision will

not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations

thereunder or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction;

and provided further that, if and only

if the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware dismisses any such action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, such action

may be brought in another state or federal court sitting in the State of Delaware.

Our certificate of incorporation further provides

that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of

America shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting

a cause of action arising under the Securities Act.

Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares

of our capital stock shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the provisions of our certificate of incorporation

described above.

We believe these provisions

benefits us by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law by chancellors particularly experienced in resolving

corporate disputes and in the application of the Securities Act by federal judges, as applicable, efficient administration of cases

on a more expedited schedule relative to other forums and protection against the burdens of multi-forum litigation.

However, these

provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with

us or our directors, officers or other employees or agents, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers

and other employees and agents.

we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, would

be your sole source of gain.

We have never declared

or paid any cash dividends on our common stock.

We currently anticipate that we will retain future earnings for the development,

operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends for the foreseeable future.

As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock would be your sole source of gain on an investment in our common

stock for the foreseeable future.

be subject to securities class action litigation.

In the past, securities

class action litigation has often been brought against a company following a decline in the market price of its securities.

risk is especially relevant for us because medical device companies have experienced significant stock price volatility in recent

If we face such litigation, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources,

which could harm our business.

● the required approval of the holders of at least two-thirds of the shares entitled to vote at an election of directors to adopt, amend or repeal our bylaws or repeal the provisions of our certificate of incorporation regarding the election and removal of directors;

● a prohibition on stockholder action by written consent, which forces stockholder action to be taken at an annual or special meeting of our stockholders;

● the requirement that a special meeting of stockholders may be called only by the chairman of the board of directors, the chief executive officer, the president or the board of directors, which may delay the ability of our stockholders to force consideration of a proposal or to take action, including the removal of directors;

● advance notice procedures that stockholders must comply with in order to nominate candidates to our board of directors or to propose matters to be acted upon at a stockholders’ meeting, which may discourage or deter a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirer’s own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.

Moreover, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”), which prohibits a person who owns in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock from merging or combining with us for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person acquired in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock, unless the merger or combination is approved in a prescribed manner.

Our certificate of incorporation designates specific courts as the exclusive forum for certain litigation that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.

Our certificate of incorporation provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty or other wrongdoing by any of our directors, officers, employees or agents to us or our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or our certificate of incorporation or bylaws, (iv) any action to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of our certificate of incorporation or bylaws or (v) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine;

provided that, the exclusive forum provision will not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction;

and provided further that, if and only if the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware dismisses any such action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, such action may be brought in another state or federal court sitting in the State of Delaware.

Our certificate of incorporation further provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act.

Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our capital stock shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the provisions of our certificate of incorporation described above.

We believe these provisions benefits us by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law by chancellors particularly experienced in resolving corporate disputes and in the application of the Securities Act by federal judges, as applicable, efficient administration of cases on a more expedited schedule relative to other forums and

protection against the burdens of multi-forum litigation.

However, these provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees or agents, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees and agents.

Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, would be your sole source of gain.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock.

We currently anticipate that we will retain future earnings for the development, operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends for the foreseeable future.

As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock would be your sole source of gain on an investment in our common stock for the foreseeable future.

We could be subject to securities class action litigation.

In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company following a decline in the market price of its securities.

This risk is especially relevant for us because medical device companies have experienced significant stock price volatility in recent years.

If we face such litigation, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could harm our business.

We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) and, as a result, qualify for, and may rely on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements.

Affiliates of HighCape Partners control a majority of our outstanding Class A common stock.

As a result, we qualify as a “controlled company” within the meaning of Nasdaq’s corporate governance standards.

A company of which more than 50% of the voting power for the election of directors is held by an individual, a group or another company is a “controlled company” within the meaning of Nasdaq’s rules and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements of Nasdaq, including, among others:

● the requirement that a majority of our board of directors consist of independent directors;

● the requirement that we have a nominating and corporate governance committee that is comprised entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities;

● the requirement that we have a compensation committee that is comprised entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities;

● the requirement for an annual performance evaluation of the nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees.

For so long as we remain a controlled company, we may at any time and from time to time, utilize any or all of these exemptions.

As a result, our board of directors and those committees may have more directors who do not meet Nasdaq’s independence standards than they would if those standards were to apply.

The independence standards are intended to ensure that directors who meet those standards are free of any conflicting interest that could influence their actions as directors.

Accordingly, you may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of Nasdaq.

General Risk Factors

relating to the LIBOR calculation process and potential phasing out of LIBOR after 2021 may adversely affect the market value of

our current or future debt obligations.

The London Inter-bank

Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and certain other interest “benchmarks”

may be subject to regulatory guidance and/or

reform that could cause interest rates under our current or future debt agreements to perform differently than in the past or cause

other unanticipated consequences.

The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, has announced

that it intends to stop encouraging or requiring banks to submit LIBOR rates after 2021 or, in certain cases, 2023, and it is unclear

if LIBOR will cease to exist or if new methods of calculating LIBOR will evolve.

If LIBOR ceases to exist or if the methods of

calculating LIBOR change from their current form, there may be adverse impacts on the financial markets generally and interest

rates on borrowings under our Term Loan Facility and Revolving Credit Facility may be adversely affected.

in accounting standards and subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments by management related to complex accounting matters

could significantly affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

GAAP, and related

accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines and interpretations with regard to a wide range of matters that are relevant

to our business are highly complex.

These matters include, but are not limited to, revenue recognition, leases, income taxes, impairment

of goodwill and long-lived assets and equity-based compensation.

Changes in these rules, guidelines or interpretations could significantly

change our reported or expected financial performance or financial condition.

In addition, the preparation

of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make assumptions, estimates and judgments that affect the

amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.

We base our estimates and judgments on historical

experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.

The results of these estimates

form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets, liabilities and equity, and the amount of net sales and

expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Our operating results may be adversely affected if our assumptions change

or if actual circumstances differ from those in our assumptions, which could cause our operating results to fall below the expectations

of securities analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in our stock price.

Our disclosure

controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.

We have designed our

disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance that information we must disclose in reports we file or submit

under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, and recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the

time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC.

We believe that any disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how

well-conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are

These inherent limitations

include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or

Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people

or by an unauthorized override of the controls.

Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in our control system, misstatements

due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

If our operating

and financial performance in any given period does not meet the guidance we provide to the public, the market price of our Class

A common stock may decline.

We may, but are not

obligated to, provide public guidance on our expected operating and financial results for future periods.

Any such guidance will

be comprised of forward-looking statements subject to certain risks and uncertainties similar to those described in this Annual

Report and any additional risks and uncertainties described from time to time in our public filings or other public statements.

Uncertainty relating to the LIBOR calculation process and potential phasing out of LIBOR after 2021 may adversely affect the market value of our current or future debt obligations.

The London Inter-bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and certain other interest “benchmarks” may be subject to regulatory guidance and/or reform that could cause interest rates under our current or future debt agreements to perform

differently than in the past or cause other unanticipated consequences.

The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, has announced that it intends to stop encouraging or requiring banks to submit LIBOR rates after 2021 or, in certain cases, 2023, and it is unclear if LIBOR will cease to exist or if new methods of calculating LIBOR will evolve.

If LIBOR ceases to exist or if the methods of calculating LIBOR change from their current form, there may be adverse impacts on the financial markets generally and interest rates on borrowings under our Term Loan Facility and Revolving Credit Facility may be adversely affected.

Changes in accounting standards and subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments by management related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

GAAP, and related accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines and interpretations with regard to a wide range of matters that are relevant to our business are highly complex.

These matters include, but are not limited to, revenue recognition, leases, income taxes, impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets and stock-based compensation.

Changes in these rules, guidelines or interpretations could significantly change our reported or expected financial performance or financial condition.

In addition, the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make assumptions, estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.

We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.

The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets, liabilities and equity, and the amount of net sales and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Our operating results may be adversely affected if our assumptions change or if actual circumstances differ from those in our assumptions, which could cause our operating results to fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in our stock price.

Our disclosure controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.

We have designed our disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance that information we must disclose in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, and recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC.

We believe that any disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well-conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.

These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.

Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by an unauthorized override of the controls.

Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in our control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

If our operating and financial performance in any given period does not meet the guidance we provide to the public, the market price of our Class A common stock may decline.

We may, but are not obligated to, continue to provide public guidance on our expected operating and financial results for future periods.

Any such guidance will be comprised of forward-looking statements subject to certain risks and uncertainties similar to those described in this Annual Report and any additional risks and uncertainties described from time to time in our public filings or other public statements.

Our actual results may not always be in line with or exceed any guidance we have provided, especially in times of economic uncertainty.

Even if we do issue public guidance, there can be no assurance that we will continue to do so in the future.

If, in the future,

we provide guidance, and our operating and/or financial results for a particular period do not meet such guidance or the expectations

of investment analysts, or if we reduce, withdraw or otherwise change our guidance for future periods, or stop providing guidance,

the market price of our Class A common stock will likely decline.

If securities

or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they issue an adverse or misleading opinion regarding

our Class A common stock, our stock price and trading volume would likely decline.

The trading market

for our Class A common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about

us and our business.

There can be no assurance that we will continue to issue public guidance in the future.

If, in the future, we provide guidance, and our operating and/or financial results for a particular period do not meet such guidance or the expectations of investment analysts, or if we reduce, withdraw or otherwise change our guidance for future periods, or stop providing guidance, the market price of our Class A common stock will likely decline.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they issue an adverse or misleading opinion regarding our Class A common stock, our stock price and trading volume would likely decline.

The trading market for our Class A common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us and our business.

We do not control these analysts.

As a newly public company, we may be slow to attract research coverage and

the analysts, who publish information about our Class A common stock, will have had relatively little experience with us or our

industry, which could affect their ability to accurately forecast our results and could make it more likely that we fail to meet

their estimates.

If no or few securities or industry analysts commence coverage of us, the trading price for our stock would be

negatively impacted.

In the event we obtain securities or industry analyst coverage, if any of the analysts who cover us issue

an adverse or misleading opinion regarding us, our business model, our financial performance, our stock price or otherwise, our

stock price would likely decline.

If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly,

we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline and result

in the loss of all or a part of your investment in us.

We may be slow to attract research coverage and the analysts, who publish information about our Class A common stock, may have had relatively little experience with us or our industry, which could affect their ability to accurately forecast our results and could make it more likely that we fail to meet their estimates.

If no or few securities or industry analysts commence coverage of us, the trading price for our stock would be negatively impacted.

In the event we obtain securities or industry analyst coverage, if any of the analysts who cover us issue an adverse or misleading opinion regarding us, our business model, our financial performance, our stock price or otherwise, our stock price would likely decline.

If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline and result in the loss of all or a part of your investment in us.

Unresolved Staff Comments.

Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.

What changed 10-K

Item 1A. Risk Factors