Risk Factors.
−Removed: We have disclosed under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2023 risk factors which materially affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
+Added: We have disclosed under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2023 and June 30, 2023 risk factors which materially affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Other than revisions to the risk factor below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in such reports.
−Removed: Healthcare reform legislation impacts cannot accurately be predicted and could adversely affect our results of operations.
−Removed: We and the healthcare operators leasing our properties depend on the healthcare industry and are susceptible to risks associated with healthcare reform.
−Removed: Legislative proposals are introduced each year that would introduce major changes in the healthcare system, both nationally and at the state level.
−Removed: For example, we believe that efforts may be made to, among other things, transition Federal payment programs further in the direction of value based care, but we cannot predict whether or in what form any of these measures may be enacted, or what effect they would have on our business or the businesses of our tenants if enacted.
−Removed: Efforts may also be made to reduce the age at which individuals become eligible for Medicare, which could have an adverse impact on our tenants because Medicare sometimes reimburses long term care providers at rates lower than those paid by commercial payors.
−Removed: In addition, the Biden Administration announced a focus on implementing minimum staffing requirements and increased inspections as part of nursing home reforms announced in the 2022 State of the Union Address, and in July 2022, CMS announced it was evaluating a proposed federal staffing mandate for SNFs.
−Removed: Specifically, CMS sought input on establishing minimum staffing requirements for long-term care facilities and issued updates to guidance on minimum health and safety standards that long-term care facilities must meet to participate in Medicare and Medicaid and updated and developed new guidance in the State Operations Manual to address issues that significantly affect residents of long-term care facilities.
−Removed: CMS has announced that it is continuing to review the comments it received in response to its request for information on establishing minimum staffing requirements for long-term care facilities, and that it remains committed to proposing a minimum staffing standard.
−Removed: It is uncertain whether such a mandate will be implemented and, if it is, whether it will be accompanied by additional funding to offset any increased staffing requirements for our operators.
−Removed: If additional funding is unavailable at sufficient levels or at all, a mandate to increase staffing levels in SNFs may have a material adverse effect on the operating results and financial condition of our tenants.
−Removed: Our tenants are subject to extensive federal, state and local laws and regulations affecting the healthcare industry that include those relating to, among other things, licensure, conduct of operations, ownership of facilities, addition of facilities and equipment, allowable costs, services, prices for services, qualified beneficiaries, quality of care, patient rights and insurance, fraudulent or abusive behavior, and financial and other arrangements that may be entered into by healthcare providers.
−Removed: See “Government Regulation, Licensing and Enforcement” in Item 1 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 for more information.
−Removed: If our tenants or operators fail to comply with the laws, regulations and other requirements applicable to their businesses and the operation of our properties, they could become ineligible to receive reimbursement from governmental and private third-party payor programs, face bans on admissions of new patients or residents, suffer civil or criminal penalties or be required to make significant operational changes.
−Removed: We believe that additional resources may be dedicated to regulatory enforcement, which could increase our tenants’ costs of doing business and negatively impact their ability to pay their rent obligations to us.
−Removed: Changes in enforcement policies by federal and state governments have also resulted in a significant increase in inspection rates, citations of regulatory deficiencies and sanctions, including terminations from Medicare and Medicaid programs, bars on Medicare and Medicaid payments for new admissions, civil monetary penalties and criminal penalties.
−Removed: Our tenants and operators could be forced to expend considerable resources responding to an investigation, lawsuit or other enforcement action under applicable laws or regulations.
−Removed: Additionally, if our tenants’ residents do not have insurance, it could adversely impact the tenants’ ability to satisfy their obligation to us.
−Removed: We cannot predict whether any future legislative proposals will be adopted or, if adopted, the impact these proposals would have on our tenants or our business.
+Added: Investments through joint ventures involve risks not present in investments in which we are the sole investor.
+Added: We have invested, and may continue to invest, as a joint venture partner in joint ventures.
+Added: Such investments may involve risks not otherwise present when acquiring real estate directly, including for example:
+Added: • the joint venture partner(s) may at any time have economic or business interests or goals which are or which may become inconsistent with our business interests or goals, including inconsistent goals relating to the sale of properties held in the joint venture or the timing of termination or liquidation of the joint venture;
+Added: • the possibility that the joint venture partner(s) might become insolvent or bankrupt;
+Added: • the possibility that we may incur liabilities as a result of an action taken by the joint venture partner(s);
+Added: • joint ventures may share certain approval rights over major decisions;
+Added: • a joint venture partner may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions or requests or contrary to our policies or objectives, including our policy with respect to qualifying and maintaining our qualification as a REIT;
+Added: • our ability to sell or transfer our interest in the joint ventures on advantageous terms when we so desire may be limited or restricted under the terms of our agreements with the counterparties in the joint ventures;
+Added: • we may be required to contribute additional capital if the counterparties in the joint ventures fail to fund their share of required capital contributions;
+Added: • disputes between us and a joint venture partner may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and distract our officers and directors from focusing their time and effort on our business and result in subjecting the properties owned by the applicable joint venture to additional risk;
+Added: • under certain joint venture arrangements, neither joint venture partner may have the power to control the venture, and an impasse could be reached which might have a negative influence on the joint venture.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.