3 unchanged sentences
and certain of its executive officers in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Corredor v.
−Removed: ASP Isotopes Inc., et al.
+Added: ASP Isotopes Inc., et al., Case No.
1:24-cv-09253 (S.D.N.Y.)) (the “Securities Class Action”).
1 unchanged sentence
The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory damages, attorney’s fees and costs.
−Removed: Defendants intend to vigorously defend against the Securities Class Action;
−Removed: however, we cannot be certain of the outcome and, if decided adversely to us, our business and financial condition may be adversely affected.
+Added: On May 2, 2025, the Court appointed Mark Leone (“Leone”) as lead plaintiff and directed the Clerk of court to amend the caption to substitute Leone for Alexander Corredor as plaintiff.
+Added: On May 2, 2025, the Court also appointed lead counsel and set deadlines for filing an amended consolidated class action complaint and briefing schedules for a motion to dismiss, if any, and class certification.
+Added: On May 27, 2025, Leone and two additional named plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”) filed the amended class action complaint
+Added: (“Amended Complaint”), that asserts the same causes of action and seeks the same relief as the initial complaint and is based upon substantially similar factual allegations as the initial complaint.
+Added: On June 27, 2025, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint.
+Added: Also on June 27, 2025, Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification.
+Added: On December 4, 2025, the Court denied in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss and granted Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification.
+Added: On April 3, 2026, following a mediation in which the parties reached an agreement-in-principle to resolve all claims in the Securities Class Action, subject to the Court’s approval, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation agreeing to stay the Securities Class Action (the “Stipulation”).
+Added: The Stipulation requires the parties to file a stipulation of settlement and for the Plaintiffs to file a motion for preliminary approval of the stipulation of settlement within 60 days of the Court’s approval of the Stipulation.
+Added: On April 6, 2026, the Court approved the Stipulation.
+Added: The Company cannot be certain of the outcome of the Securities Class Action and, if decided adversely to us, our business and financial condition may be adversely affected.
+Added: On January 30, 2026, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a derivative action against certain members of the Company’s board of directors in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas asserting claims for, among others, breach of fiduciary duty, violation of § 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and a claim for contribution pursuant to § 21D thereof (Jenis v.
+Added: Mann, et al., Case No.
+Added: 3:26-cv-251 (N.D.
+Added: Tex.)) (the “Jenis Action”).
+Added: The Company is named as a Nominal Defendant.
+Added: On March 2, 2026, a different purported stockholder of the Company filed a derivative action against certain members of the Company’s board of directors in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York asserting claims for, among others, breach of fiduciary duty, violations of §§ 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and a claim for contribution pursuant to § 21D thereof (Stewart v.
+Added: Mann, et al., Case No.
+Added: 1:26-cv-1712 (S.D.N.Y.)) (the “Stewart Action”) (together with the Jenis Action, the “Derivative Actions”)).
+Added: The Company is named as a Nominal Defendant.
+Added: The Derivative Actions arise out of similar allegations as those made in the Securities Class Action.
+Added: The plaintiffs in the Derivative Actions seek unspecified damages, disgorgement of compensation, corporate governance reforms, fees, interests, and costs.
+Added: The defendants have not yet responded to the complaints in the Derivative Actions.
+Added: The Company cannot be certain of the outcome of the Derivative Actions and, if decided adversely to us, our business and financial condition may be adversely affected.
In addition to the matters described above, from time to time, we may become subject to arbitration, litigation or claims arising in the ordinary course of business.
The results of any current or future claims or proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, and regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and litigation costs, diversion of management resources, reputational harm and other factors.
+Added: Please also see the section captioned “Legal Proceedings” in Part I, Item 1 above.
Mine Safety Disclosures
1 unchanged sentence
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.