−Removed: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
−Removed: were engaged in an arbitration proceeding with REGENXBIO regarding the former license agreement between the parties relating to use of
−Removed: the AAV9 capsid in our MPS IIIA, MPS IIIB, CLN1 (which has now been sold to Taysha Gene Therapies), and CLN3 programs.
−Removed: The license terminated
−Removed: on May 2, 2020, and on May 25, 2020, we filed an arbitration claim with the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) alleging
−Removed: that REGENXBIO materially breached the license agreement prior to termination and seeking, among other things, a declaration that as
−Removed: a result of REGENXBIO’s material breach, we were not responsible for payments totaling $28 million (which would otherwise have
−Removed: been due in 2020) plus accrued interest ($6.4 million as of June 30, 2021 based on invoices received from REGENXBIO).
−Removed: disputed our arbitration claim and filed a counterclaim seeking payment of the $28 million plus interest, which REGENXBIO argued remained
−Removed: An arbitration hearing before a tribunal of three AAA arbitrators was held on March 8 and March 9, 2021.
−Removed: On July 13, 2021, the tribunal
−Removed: found in favor of REGENXBIO Inc.
−Removed: in connection with the parties’ arbitration claims and counterclaims.
−Removed: Although the tribunal awarded
−Removed: REGENXBIO $28.0 million plus interest, we believe that prior to the arbitration decision, the two companies had entered into a binding
−Removed: settlement agreement, including $18.0 million payable to REGENXBIO over a two-year period.
−Removed: We intend to seek enforcement of the settlement
+Added: were engaged in an arbitration proceeding with REGENXBIO regarding the former license agreement between us and REGENXBIO relating to
+Added: use of the AAV9 capsid in our MPS IIIA, MPS IIIB, CLN1 (which has now been sold to Taysha Gene Therapies), and CLN3 programs.
+Added: license terminated on May 2, 2020, and on May 25, 2020, we filed an arbitration claim with the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”)
+Added: alleging that REGENXBIO materially breached the license agreement prior to termination and seeking, among other things, a declaration
+Added: that as a result of REGENXBIO’s material breach, we were not responsible for payments totaling $28 million (which would otherwise
+Added: have been due in 2020) plus accrued interest.
+Added: REGENXBIO disputed our arbitration claim and filed a counterclaim seeking payment of the
+Added: $28 million plus interest, which REGENXBIO argued remained due.
+Added: An arbitration hearing before a tribunal of three AAA arbitrators was
+Added: held on March 8 and March 9, 2021.
+Added: On July 13, 2021, the tribunal found in favor of REGENXBIO in connection with the parties’ arbitration
+Added: claims and counterclaims.
+Added: The tribunal awarded REGENXBIO $28.0 million plus interest.
+Added: 2021, we filed a second arbitration claim with the AAA asserting that a settlement had been reached before the tribunal’s award
+Added: in the first arbitration was issued.
+Added: On September 14, 2021, REGENXBIO filed its answer, a counterclaim seeking attorney fees and costs,
+Added: and a request for permission to file a case dispositive motion.
+Added: A preliminary hearing was held on November 1, 2021, during which the
+Added: AAA Tribunal set timetables for discovery and for REGENXBIO’s filing of its case dispositive motion.
+Added: Those timetables were formalized
+Added: in a procedural order issued by the Tribunal on November 8, 2021.
+Added: Under the schedule set by the Tribunal, REGENXBIO’s opening brief
+Added: in support of its case dispositive motion was filed on November 8, 2021, briefing was scheduled to be completed on December 29, 2021,
+Added: and oral argument was scheduled for January 14, 2022.
+Added: REGENXBIO had also filed suit in the New York State Supreme Court Commercial Division
+Added: seeking enforcement of the original arbitration award, and we had requested that the Court stay that proceeding until the second arbitration
+Added: Oral argument on our request for a stay was set for March 10, 2022.
+Added: 12, 2021, we entered into a settlement agreement (“Settlement Agreement”) with REGENXBIO to resolve all current disputes
+Added: between the parties including the aforementioned AAA arbitration and New York State Court action.
+Added: In accordance with the Settlement Agreement,
+Added: we agreed to pay REGENXBIO a total of $30 million, payable as follows:
+Added: (1) $20 million payable within one business day of the execution
+Added: of the Settlement Agreement, (2) $5 million on the first anniversary of the effective date of the Settlement Agreement, and (3) $5 million
+Added: upon the earlier of:
+Added: (i) the third anniversary of the effective date of the Settlement Agreement or (ii) the closing of a Strategic Transaction,
+Added: as defined in the Settlement Agreement.
+Added: Under the Settlement Agreement’s terms, the prior license agreement between the parties
+Added: was not reinstituted, and any future license agreement would need to be negotiated separately and require consideration in addition to
+Added: the consideration set forth in the Settlement Agreement.
+Added: As of September 30, 2021, we have recorded the payable to licensor in the balance
+Added: sheet based on the present value of the payments due to REGENXBIO under the Settlement Agreement.
+Added: The accounting for the Settlement Agreement
+Added: resulted in a $6.7 million gain on settlement with licensor in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss during the three and
+Added: nine months ended September 30, 2021 and a $6.7 million non-cash gain on settlement with licensor in the statement of cash flows during
+Added: the nine months ended September 30, 2021.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.