quant research // summarizing the paperLOADING
Gbenga Ibikunle, Ben Moews, Dmitriy Muravyev, Khaladdin Rzayev · 2026-08-01
A plain-English AI summary of what this paper means for investors — generated on demand from the abstract.
We introduce data-driven measures of high-frequency trading (HFT) that distinguish between liquidity-supplying and liquidity-demanding strategies. We train machine learning models on a proprietary dataset with observed HFT activity, then apply these models to public intraday data to generate HFT measures across all U.S. stocks during 2010-2023. Our measures outperform conventional proxies, which struggle to capture the temporal dynamics of HFT. Consistent with theory, our measures respond to a quasi-exogenous speed bump introduction and a data feed upgrade. The measures help uncover the differential impact of HFT on information acquisition. Liquidity-supplying HFT improves price informativeness around earnings announcements, while liquidity-demanding HFT impedes it.
Go deeper: a full research-committee breakdown of this paper, its assumptions and failure modes, and how its method would apply to a specific ticker or your watchlist. See StockTools AI →
AI summary generated from the paper’s public abstract via arXiv; it may miss nuance — read the source before relying on it. Thank you to arXiv for its open-access interoperability; StockTools is not affiliated with arXiv, and all rights remain with the authors. Educational only, not financial advice.