Shantanu Awasthi, Minglian Lin, Blair Faber, Michael Roberts, Hassan Butt · 2026-06-22
The paper extends the classic Black-Scholes option-pricing model by adding stochastic volatility and price jumps modeled with a Lévy process, using advanced math (Itô and Malliavin calculus) to derive a European call pricing formula and an exact expression for at-the-money implied volatility. The authors argue this richer model better reproduces real market features like volatility smiles and matches observed VIX behavior.
Why it matters: For anyone working with options pricing or volatility modeling, this offers a more realistic framework than plain Black-Scholes for capturing jumps and the volatility smile. It could, in principle, improve fair-value estimates and implied-volatility calibration, though the authors themselves flag that broader empirical testing is still needed.
⚠ It is a theoretical model with limited empirical validation — the authors explicitly say more testing across market conditions and option types is required before relying on it.
The Black-Scholes model has been extensively used for option pricing, but exhibits limitations in its reliance on geometric Brownian motion and fixed volatility assumptions. This paper proposes an enhanced model incorporating stochastic volatility with jumps modeled by a Lévy process. Leveraging multidimensional Itô calculus, we derive a pricing formula for European call options under the new framework. Additionally, Malliavin calculus enables the derivation of an exact expression for at-the-money implied volatility. The proposed model is shown to better capture empirical features like volatility smiles. Analysis of VIX data demonstrates the model's ability to match observed market volatility. The integration of Lévy processes and Malliavin calculus represents a valuable advancement in addressing deficiencies in the classic Black-Scholes model. Further empirical testing is warranted to validate the approach across varying market conditions and option types.
Go deeper: a full research-committee breakdown of this paper, its assumptions and failure modes, and how its method would apply to a specific ticker or your watchlist. See StockTools AI →
AI summary generated from the paper’s public abstract via arXiv; it may miss nuance — read the source before relying on it. Thank you to arXiv for its open-access interoperability; StockTools is not affiliated with arXiv, and all rights remain with the authors. Educational only, not financial advice.